Property talk:P451

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

partner
someone in a relationship without being married. Use "spouse" for married couples.
Descriptionpartner of the subject (i.e. someone with whom the subject was closely related but not married, as befits today's modern "partnership" as opposed to marriage trend).
Representssignificant other (Q841509)
Associated item
Data typeItem
Template parameter"partner" in en:Template:Infobox person
Domain
According to this template: person
According to statements in the property:
human (Q5), fictional character (Q95074), legendary figure (Q13002315), mythical character (Q4271324), giant panda (Q33602), deity (Q178885), mythical creature (Q2239243) and doll (Q168658)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed valuesperson (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
ExampleSimone de Beauvoir (Q7197)Jean-Paul Sartre (Q9364)
George Sand (Q3816)Frédéric Chopin (Q1268)
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P451 (Q23036836)
See alsospouse (P26)
Lists
Proposal discussionProperty proposal/Archive/6#P451
Current uses6,424
Search for values
[create] Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here
Symmetric property: if [item A] has this property linked to [item B], then [item B] should also have this property linked to [item A]. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P451#Symmetric, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
Value type “human (Q5), fictional character (Q95074), legendary figure (Q13002315), mythical character (Q4271324), giant panda (Q33602), deity (Q178885), mythical creature (Q2239243): This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value human (Q5), fictional character (Q95074), legendary figure (Q13002315), mythical character (Q4271324), giant panda (Q33602), deity (Q178885), mythical creature (Q2239243) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P451#Value type Q5, Q95074, Q13002315, Q4271324, Q33602, Q178885, Q2239243, hourly updated report, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
Property “sex or gender (P21)” declared by target items of “partner (P451): If [item A] has this property with value [item B], [item B] is required to have property “sex or gender (P21)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P451#Target required claim P21, SPARQL, SPARQL (by value), SPARQL (new)
Type “human (Q5), fictional character (Q95074), legendary figure (Q13002315), mythical character (Q4271324), giant panda (Q33602), deity (Q178885), mythical creature (Q2239243), doll (Q168658): element must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “human (Q5), fictional character (Q95074), legendary figure (Q13002315), mythical character (Q4271324), giant panda (Q33602), deity (Q178885), mythical creature (Q2239243), doll (Q168658)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P451#Type Q5, Q95074, Q13002315, Q4271324, Q33602, Q178885, Q2239243, Q168658, hourly updated report, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
Item “sex or gender (P21): Items with this property should also have “sex or gender (P21)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P451#Item P21, search, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
Item “place of birth (P19): Items with this property should also have “place of birth (P19)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P451#Item P19, search, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
Item “date of birth (P569): Items with this property should also have “date of birth (P569)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P451#Item P569, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
Citation needed: the property must have at least one reference (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P451#citation needed, SPARQL (new)
Contemporaries:
if [item A] has this property (partner (P451)) linked to [item B],
then [item A] and [item B] have to coincide or coexist at some point of history. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P451#Contemporary, SPARQL (new)
This property is being used by:

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Contemporaries:
if [item A] has this property (P451) linked to [item B],
then [item A] and [item B] have to coincide or coexist at some point of history.
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P451#Contemporary, SPARQL
Pictogram voting comment.svg Partner didn't live during the same time as subject
death date of person A is before birth date of person B (Help)
Violations query: SELECT * { {SELECT ?item WHERE { ?item wdt:P451 ?item2 . ?item p:P569/psv:P569 ?birth1_node . ?birth1_node wikibase:timeValue ?birth1 . ?birth1_node wikibase:timePrecision "11"^^xsd:integer . ?item2 p:P570/psv:P570 ?death2_node . ?death2_node wikibase:timeValue ?death2 . ?death2_node wikibase:timePrecision "11"^^xsd:integer . FILTER (?birth1 > ?death2) } } UNION {SELECT ?item WHERE { ?item wdt:P451 ?item2 . ?item p:P570/psv:P570 ?death1_node . ?death1_node wikibase:timeValue ?death1 . ?death1_node wikibase:timePrecision "11"^^xsd:integer . ?item2 p:P569/psv:P569 ?birth2_node . ?birth2_node wikibase:timeValue ?birth2 . ?birth2_node wikibase:timePrecision "11"^^xsd:integer . FILTER (?birth2 > ?death1)} } }
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/P451#Partner didn't live during the same time as subject

Clarify the scope of this property[edit]

I'm a bit confused by the scope of this property. Is it meant for cohabitants in

  1. the sense of "common-law spouse" (that is, a status the law automatically grants to two people who have lived together under marriage-like relationship for a certain amount of time without ever having been married, registered as cohabitants or undergone any kind of matrimony-like ceremony - for example the relationship between Q3020859 and Q34969),
  2. the sense of "registered partner" (as in a marriage-like status available to same-sex couples in some jurisdictions where the legislature is reluctant to recognize same-sex marriages - for example the relationship between Q1174489 and Q2808), or
  3. a more generic sense of "life partner" (meaning that there isn't necessarily any kind of judicial recognition of the relationship whatsoever)

Because for some languages it can be quite tricky to translate the title of this property without choosing one of the above interpretations. Gabbe (talk) 18:12, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Moreover: does it necessarily include sexual relationship? See use for Harry Potter friends. --Infovarius (talk) 11:51, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Belarusian alias and greek description[edit]

I failed to revert this edit (removal of a Belarusian alias) because the greek description is too long, and you can't edit anything if there is such a length violation. However, the greek description exists for quite a while now (inserted by User:Vchorozopoulos in April) and the property has been edited a lot since, so maybe others don't have that problem (?). I can't change the Greek description, as I don't understand it. (I also don't understand Belarusian, but User:Wizardist, who inserted that alias once, does, and Google Translate tells me that it's a correct alias, while the IP is from the United States and therefore probably more likely to randomly remove the alias than actually correcting things. If you think I'm wrong, just tell me.) --YMS (talk) 16:06, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Update: I was able to revert using the revert button, and therefore without any comment, which I would have added otherwise. Then again, I commented here excessively. --YMS (talk) 16:08, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

P19 constraint[edit]

I don't see why this item needs a constraint requiring place of birth (P19), it doesn't seem relevant. spouse (P26) doesn't have it. Ghouston (talk) 04:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Evidence requirement[edit]

The description says this item applies when a "person is in a relationship without being married". It's a good idea to require a reference to confirm that the relationship exists, but how do we know for sure that two people aren't married? The information isn't necessarily public. Perhaps the description should just say "not known to be married"? Ghouston (talk) 04:58, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

How can someone express that someone have a continued "affair" with the item?[edit]

Should we use a qualifier? Which? --93.41.235.15 02:39, 26 June 2018 (UTC)