Property talk:P355

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

subsidiary
subsidiary of a company or organization, opposite of parent organization (P749)
DescriptionSubsidiaries of a company. Opposite of parent organization (P749).
Representssubsidiary company (Q658255)
Data typeItem
Domain
According to this template: organisations, specifically company (Q783794)
According to statements in the property:
organization (Q43229) and fictional organization (Q14623646)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed valuesorganisations, specifically company (Q783794) (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
ExampleThe Walt Disney Company (Q7414)Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures (Q1323594) and Walt Disney Animation Studios (Q1047410)
Microsoft (Q2283)Skype Technologies (Q246125)
Tracking: sameno label (Q42533285)
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P355 (Q23909080)
See alsobusiness division (P199), has part (P527)
Lists
Proposal discussion[not applicable Proposal discussion]
Current uses15,305
Search for values
[create] Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here
Type “organization (Q43229), fictional organization (Q14623646): element must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “organization (Q43229), fictional organization (Q14623646)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P355#type Q43229, Q14623646, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
Value type “organization (Q43229), fictional organization (Q14623646): This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value organization (Q43229), fictional organization (Q14623646) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P355#Value type Q43229, Q14623646, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
Inverse property of “parent organization (P749):
if [item A] has this property (subsidiary (P355)) linked to [item B],
then [item B] should also have property “parent organization (P749)” linked to [item A]. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P355#Inverse, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)


Contemporaries:
if [item A] has this property (P355) linked to [item B],
then [item A] and [item B] have to coincide or coexist at some point of history.
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P355#Contemporary, SPARQL
This property is being used by:

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Possible rename[edit]

I suggest we change subsidiary (P355) which does not seem grammatically correct and is therefore confusing, if I add the property subsidiary (P355) it appears that the parent item is a subsidiary of the items listed in that property, I'd recommend we change the label to "subsidiaries," "subsidiary entities," or "Parent company of" with the aka, "subsidiaries"
✓ Done Jared Zimmerman (talk) 22:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Usage[edit]


The inverse property exists, parent organization (P749) but it doesn't have the actual inverse property logic associating them together, or the script to check for violations.
Jared Zimmerman (talk) 23:01, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

The description does not fit the property (in English) and the inverse property is needed as well[edit]

Given that some organisations like "the art institute" have many subsidiaries, it makes sense to be able to indicate "subsidiary of".

The current text describes exactly this but uses it where it is actually a list. Thanks, GerardM (talk) 12:04, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Type: company (Q783794) or business (Q4830453)?[edit]

I notice that Whirlpool Corporation (Q1471346) has conflicts involving this property because the subsidiaries are not instances of company (Q783794) but business (Q4830453). Should business (Q4830453) be a subclass of company (Q783794)? Or the converse, and we should therefore change this constraint? I am not familiar enough with companies to understand the difference between the two notions. − Pintoch (talk) 18:30, 8 May 2017 (UTC) Kopiersperre Jklamo ArthurPSmith S.K. Givegivetake fnielsen rjlabs ChristianKl Vladimir Alexiev User:Pintoch Parikan User:Cardinha00 User:zuphilip MB-one User:Simonmarch User:Jneubert Mathieudu68 User:Kippelboy User:Datawiki30 User:PKM User:RollTide882071 Kristbaum Andber08 Sidpark


Pictogram voting comment.svg Notified participants of WikiProject Companies

I have just set business (Q4830453) to be a subclass of company (Q783794). Feel free to change if you see a better solution! − Pintoch (talk) 20:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Title ID Data type Description Examples Inverse
subsidiaryP355Itemsubsidiary company: subsidiaries of a company[[d:The Walt Disney Company|The Walt Disney Company]] <subsidiary> [[d:Walt Disney Pictures>
<Walt Disney Animation Studios>
<Walt Disney Theatrical>
<Pixar Animation Studios>
<Marvel Entertainment>
<Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC>
<The Muppets Holding Company>
<others|Walt Disney Pictures>
<Walt Disney Animation Studios>
<Walt Disney Theatrical>
<Pixar Animation Studios>
<Marvel Entertainment>
<Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC>
<The Muppets Holding Company>
<others]]
parent organization