Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2020/09/02

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q98826715

Château-musée Henri IV (Q98826715): museum in France: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The itame already exists here : Q27652836 --Le Paragone (talk) 23:20, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done Redirect created by User:Hasley, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98804624

Q98804624: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Hasley 01:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by DannyS712 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 01:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Lexeme:L311258

invalid ID (L311258): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam. Hasley 01:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by DannyS712 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 01:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98791681

Q98791681: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable. No links Dr.üsenfieber (talk) 01:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Wiki13 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q54595346

Melodie Gore (Q54595346): retired cosplayer and alternative model: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

First of all, she's not an adult actress as stated in the item. She made appearances in two alt porn films in non-sex roles and there are some nude photos can be found but this fact doesn't make her 'pornographic actress' in the general sense, so the item misleads the users. Among a minimal number of Google search results there are nothing that proves her notability in the sense of WD:N #2, all I can find on her is that she's just a alternative cosplay model, in short a next-door tattooed girl with ~4K subscribers at Facebook. The Commons category is the only thing that's justifying the existance of the item but everybody can upload there anything and categorize it. Wolverène (talk) 21:22, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Can be deleted if the Commonscat was deleted as well. Otherwise "structural need" due to the Commons infobox. —MisterSynergy (talk) 20:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Should this mean that items can be created about literally everyone who distinguished with Commons category with a Wikidata infobox? Such a fragile privilege, sounds like the infobox is a sort of 'indulgentia' for items for non-notable persons. --Wolverène (talk) 05:57, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
That has been discussed several times in the past two years roughly, and lots of Commons users have strongly lobbied for such an approach. I do not like it as well, as I think that the Commons project has a serious problem with promotional content and unsourced content which in turn spills to Wikidata as well, but this is how it is usually done currently.
As a Wikidata admin, I am usually not going to file deletion requests for categories or files at Commons. However, if I think this should be done, I leave a note as above as a hint that someone else please does this. —MisterSynergy (talk) 20:10, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
There are on-going deletion processes for her images on Commons. If they're deleted, the category will be too. Esteban16 (talk) 17:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
As far as commons is concerned, I nominated a photo from a cross-wiki promotional campaign for someone trying to be an "entrepreneur/influencer". Article gone. Quote page gone. Item gone. The image nomination looks like it may fail because "Oh, look, she is wearing bunny ears. Let's add it to the bunny ears category." We really should work out some of these "rules", particularly how they cross projects. Quakewoody (talk) 20:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted; they keep this content at Commons. —11:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q86247107

Mehdi Rajabi (Q86247107): Iranian cyclist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Seeking 2nd opinion. please verify information. everything mh6ti edits is questionable. Quakewoody (talk) 17:00, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:14, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
The item was created based on the Cycling Archives cyclist ID (P1409), for a statement in 2016 Asian Road Cycling Championships Men U23 RR (Q83284386). There is also a Russian Wikipedia article. Possibly the most recent edit [1] should be reverted. Peter James (talk) 18:48, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
I reverted; similar IPs have been adding a combination of correct information and incorrect, such as date of birth, which seems to be of another person (based on en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/مهیار_مهرنیا/Archive#Comments by other users 2). Peter James (talk) 19:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
In Latin letters, his name is found in the following variations - Name - Mehdi or Mahdi, Surname - Rajabi Kaboodcheshmeh or Rajabikaboodches Hmeh. Competition Sources page 36 (here is his ID - it matches the one indicated on the CQ) and page 3 on Cycling Federation of Iran (here is his UCI-code - which represents the date of birth). His results at the World Cup on site UCI 1 and 2 — GAN (talk) 21:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted per identifiers —MisterSynergy (talk) 11:23, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98806533

Q98806533: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Hasley 00:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98803980

Q98803980: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Hasley 01:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98793527

Q98793527: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Hasley 01:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98801192

Q98801192: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Hasley 01:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98791728

Q98791728: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, previously deleted. Hasley 01:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98793263

Q98793263: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Hasley 01:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98786648

Q98786648: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Hasley 01:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98786100

Q98786100: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, previously deleted (Q98749074) Hasley 01:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q86791462

Q86791462: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted category page Vargenau (talk) 08:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q65627599

Q65627599: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted category page Vargenau (talk) 08:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q55922114

Q55922114: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted category page Vargenau (talk) 08:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q30790544

Q30790544: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted category page Vargenau (talk) 08:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q15284952

Q15284952: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted category page Vargenau (talk) 08:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q8922399

Q8922399: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted category page Vargenau (talk) 08:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q15375561

Q15375561: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted category page Vargenau (talk) 08:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q25346850

Q25346850: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted category page Vargenau (talk) 08:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q65637447

Q65637447: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted category page Vargenau (talk) 08:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q49811704

Q49811704: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted category page Vargenau (talk) 08:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q15105233

Q15105233: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted category page Vargenau (talk) 08:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98830378

Q98830378: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability displayed Dr.üsenfieber (talk) 08:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98831335

Q98831335: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Reveals IP address --WallaceBill (talk) 10:12, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98831350

Q98831350: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Accidental duplicate of Författaren (Q79015547) --Förbätterlig (talk) 10:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98831291

Q98831291: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by mistake Trade (talk) 11:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98464540

Q98464540: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 22:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98819711

Q98819711: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Pestilence Lane (talk) 15:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98819430

Q98819430: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Pestilence Lane (talk) 15:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98819454

Q98819454: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Pestilence Lane (talk) 15:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98819680

Q98819680: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Pestilence Lane (talk) 15:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98819711

Q98819711: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Pestilence Lane (talk) 15:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q41446502

Q41446502: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Almost empty; Russian label translates to "fruit processing", and the only incoming link was as "used for" on a sort of apple. Which is tautologically true, but of limited utility Matthias Winkelmann (talk) 18:26, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q41446476

Q41446476: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This doesn't seem to rise to the level where it would be considered a distinct concept. almost empty as well. Matthias Winkelmann (talk) 18:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97066071

Q97066071: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Recreation, Advertising, not notable Baby come (talk) 19:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97704327

Q97704327: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Recreation, Advertising, not notable Baby come (talk) 19:50, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98806405

Q98806405: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Test. Hasley 00:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98807492

Q98807492: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Test. Hasley 00:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98806733

Q98806733: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Test. Hasley 00:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Bulk request

Spam --Trade (talk) 07:25, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done, except for the one with a sitelink —MisterSynergy (talk) 11:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98767121

Q98767121: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 11:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q51886105

Q51886105: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable (only known because of his wife) --Belteshassar (talk) 15:42, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:51, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q95467753

Q95467753: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable individual, using Wikidata for SEO --27.100.13.142 19:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:31, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97693078

Q97693078: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wait for local deletion Quakewoody (talk) 21:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97724641

Q97724641: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wait for local deletion Quakewoody (talk) 21:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98684563

Q98684563: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability - linked item(s) also nominated Quakewoody (talk) 22:07, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98684540

Q98684540: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notabiltity - linked item(s) also nominated Quakewoody (talk) 22:07, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98807674

Q98807674: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable, promotional, repeat re-creation Jamie7687 (talk) 13:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Wiki13 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98185663

Q98185663: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 14:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Wiki13 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q56147311

Q56147311: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

ATT guide level, combines concepts, NA for wikidata PKM (talk) 22:21, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Wiki13 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q47545188

Q47545188: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty Kiran Gopi (talk) 22:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Wiki13 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97958507

Agathe Selb (Q97958507): faith healer in Vorarlberg, Austria: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Haansn08 (talk) 19:13, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

It is used in the WMAT-project RAT. --K@rl (talk) 07:11, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
NS: She is noted in the regional literature. --K@rl (talk) 07:21, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
@K@rl: RegiowikiAT ID (P6228)instance of (P31)Wikidata property for an identifier that suggests notability (Q62589316)? --Haansn08 (talk) 21:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Please hold. Agathe Selb (Q97958507) is described in Müller, Siegfried.: Drei "Wunderheiler" aus dem Vorarlberger Oberland which should match the Wikidata-Notability citreria #2 and is the underlaying source of the RegiowikiAT-article. Thanks for the hint of Wikidata property for an identifier that suggests notability (Q62589316), i think we should add this value on RegiowikiAT ID (P6228). --Mfchris84 (talk) 21:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted per identifier —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q16207924

Sacro Cuore di Gesù agonizzante a Vitinia (Q16207924): church building in Rome, Italy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicated of Sacro Cuore di Gesù agonizzante a Vitinia (Q3668614). Cannot merge because also wikipedia is dup --Francians (talk) 13:28, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

On hold - should be fixed on the enwiki first. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 21:09, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted; not a case for a deletion anyways. Once the enwiki situation is fixed, the items can be merged without admin involvement. —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q8297169

Q8297169: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I've created an item for the topic of the category. This item only contains a Commons category (it initially did contain one from enwiki) which can be moved to the new item. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 09:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q30279549

Q30279549: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It doesn’t seem to exist! It could be the head of some unit of the “Istituto Superiore di Sanità” cited in some pubblication, but I can’t find anything worth online. Ferdi2005[Mail] 21:55, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
I've removed the link (from parent organization). Fine with me if this is deleted. ArthurPSmith (talk) 15:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Bulk request (7/7)

Batch 1
  1. Q97043961 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q97042556 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q97041385 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q97039876 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q97039448 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q97035133 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q97019666 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q97019546 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q97013397 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q97012915 (delete | history | links | logs)
  11. Q97011451 (delete | history | links | logs)
  12. Q96924400 (delete | history | links | logs)
  13. Q76400028 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)
Batch 2
  1. Q16212731 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q96189014 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q96464065 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q61000000 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q47496153 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q63348213 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q27070233 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q96035029 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q26922248 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q66808318 (delete | history | links | logs)
  11. Q67009703 (delete | history | links | logs)
  12. Q91437034 (delete | history | links | logs)
  13. Q63645138 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)
  14. Q81943175 (delete | history | links | logs)
  15. Q73496499 (delete | history | links | logs)

spam Hazard-Bot (talk) 16:22, 10 July 2020 (UTC) Spam--Trade (talk) 22:52, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

@Trade: I will address this request after you have acknowledged the note that I attached to a prior request of yours, and which I am reposting here: A few things you could do to speed things up and make things slightly easier: 1) Use the {{Rfd links}} template, just as the rest of the requests on this page do, so that the link to delete the items is quickly visible to administrators. 2) If a number of items are created by the same accounts or are edited by related entities, then specifically grouping them would help in case Special:Nuke becomes useful. 3) The spam accounts creating/editing these items should be reported as a group (perhaps with reference to this deletion request) to the Administrators' noticeboard so that administrators can directly check them out. Mahir256 (talk) 03:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
I believe your last note was archived before i could see it. "edited by related entities" It's not always clear which accounts belongs to what person "The spam accounts creating/editing these items should be reported as a group (perhaps with reference to this deletion request) to the Administrators' noticeboard so that administrators can directly check them out" Last time i had a disagreement with Esteban16. He declined to block them because the edits/item creations were too old. I don't wish to run into this problem again. @Esteban16:--Trade (talk) 03:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
@Mahir256:--Trade (talk) 13:01, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
@Nomen ad hoc: regarding Q50125758. Also @Dereckson: regarding Q24357579. Mahir256 (talk) 15:24, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Please ignore those two. They were added by mistake. --Trade (talk) 01:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Mahir!
Obviously  Keep Q50125758, as it clearly passes WD:N (and as I can't see any reason for requesting its deletion)... No opinion regarding the other items. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 15:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC).
At least one item, Mahesh Gupta (Q16186352), was recently kept because of the identifiers (Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2020/05/24#Q16186352) - there is no new reason for deletion. Peter James (talk) 21:54, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 Keep both Maganbhai Karamchand (Q19325961) and Mahesh Gupta (Q16186352): external IDs which suggest notability. --Haansn08 (talk) 01:16, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
@Deansfa: regarding Q26922248. Also @Dhx1, Crazy1880: regarding Q61000000. Mahir256 (talk) 20:16, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 Delete Q61000000 as the pt.wikipedia article was deleted, and I can't find any other source other than copy/paste sites of pt.wikipedia that prove this person is real and can be described using reasonable sources. --Dhx1 (talk) 03:30, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
@Trade: As you can see, most of the items above have been deleted. Some, however, have not:
  • Q96924400 has a sitelink, and on the surface the accompanying enwiki article does not reek of spam like others might. If you disagree, I would suggest reporting the enwiki article as well.
  • Q76400028 is part of a network of items linked to Jayanta Nath (Q63790106), created by the same user and which has aswiki and enwiki sitelinks. While I tend to support deleting this particular item on spam grounds, if you find the other items and the links to them to be spammy, report these and knock HitomiAkane about arz as well.
  • I fear that addressing Q16212731 to its creator will bring forth torrents of complaints about the suppression of topics about minorities and other streams of disparate thought for which sanctions were once imposed on wikimedia-l, so either you can take the matter up with that creator or ping @Jklamo, Thierry Caro: who have also edited it.
  • Q47496153 is connected to a number of items pertaining to some Haitian radio network (some of the connected items having htwiki articles), so it would do you good to assess those as well. (Note that the creator of the prior item on this list might object to such probing.)
  • Alessandro Passoni (Q66808318) is linked to at least two other items, one of which has an enwiki sitelink. If you think those should be deleted, please report the linked pages as well.
  • Q63645138 is linked to two Greek tennis players. While having an item to more directly link multiple otherwise notable people within a family with specific properties is fine in my view (e.g. Khujastha Akhtar Banu (Q83818990), which connected a grandfather and his grandchildren through her), I don't know whether the specific relation being filled in in this case could be excised without causing issues with the otherwise notable (albeit small) family tree formed by these items.
The great variation in the items noted here, combined with the number of items related to the items noted in this request that could have been reported at the same time, have made this request take longer than I'm sure you would have liked, for which I offer my apologies. Mahir256 (talk) 20:19, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
"I fear that addressing Q16212731 to its creator will bring forth torrents of complaints about the suppression of topics about minorities and other streams of disparate thought for which sanctions were once imposed on wikimedia-l" Could you eleborate on this? What is Wikimedia-1?--Trade (talk) 21:00, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
@Trade: The creator of that item is also the writer of this post and is the subject of this sanction (both of which are on the mailing list wikimedia-l). After taking this into consideration with regard to that bullet point, please also take some course of action one way or another with regard to the other five bullet points in that list. Mahir256 (talk) 01:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done were appropriate, rest should either be kept or nominated individually. —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q96959440

Montagne russe (Q96959440): 2020 EP by Random: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks of WD:N Eihel (talk) 07:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Link to it.wiki w:it:Montagne russe (EP). --GryffindorD (talk) 09:01, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted per sitelink —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q1167167

atmospheric electricity (Q1167167): electricity in planetary atmospheres: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

According to this discussion this item ist redundant to Q427085. Both are exactly the same thing. --87.163.123.161 12:01, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done Redirect created by User:MisterSynergy, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q60197612

Q60197612: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The subject is not an actor/celebrity/person of importance. He is two years old, and is subject to privacy restrictions I'mfeistyincognito (talk) 16:09, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:11, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98607299

Q98607299: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable person, no links or entries, no significant coverage Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 16:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98607121

Q98607121: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is not an identifier Trade (talk) 17:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

 Delete --Haansn08 (talk) 14:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
@MonFrontieres: per Help:Properties#Creating properties, new properties must first be discussed in a property proposal. Hazard-SJ (talk) 06:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98607568

Q98607568: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a identifier Trade (talk) 17:27, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:31, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q87135335

Hiroyuki Takaoka (Q87135335): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No useful info Estopedist1 (talk) 18:06, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:15, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
I see some structural need here. Rafael (stanglavine) msg 02:27, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted per backlinks —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98605531

Q98605531: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Rockpeterson (talk) 12:15, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98710444

Q98710444: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable company Alexhuff13 (talk) 07:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Please give the item ID. --Bapnadev (talk) 08:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

it is a notable company trade mark registered

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98730387

Q98730387: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability ElliotPadfield (talk) 12:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98831940

Q98831940: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty Redaktor (talk) 13:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Wiki13 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98831881

Q98831881: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Almost empty, not notable Pyfisch (talk) 13:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Wiki13 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98829605

Q98829605: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Test edit Pyfisch (talk) 14:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Wiki13 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98832075

Q98832075: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable item. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 14:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Wiki13 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q9018005

Q9018005: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only entry deleted from the nlwiki --- сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 14:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Wiki13 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98821743

Q98821743: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Rockpeterson (talk) 13:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Wiki13 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98821602

Q98821602: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam , advertising , commons image is on deletion Rockpeterson (talk) 13:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Wiki13 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98828262

Chandralekha Kangali (Q98828262): Indian author: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable entity Alexhuff13 (talk) 13:03, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Alexhuff13:  Not done, fulfills structural need. Motiravan Kangali (Q98201920) was her husband. Esteban16 (talk) 14:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98828627

Q98828627: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Alexhuff13 (talk) 13:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98786650

Q98786650: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. – Aranya (talk) 13:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98828225

Q98828225: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty Alexhuff13 (talk) 13:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98827469

Q98827469: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam Alexhuff13 (talk) 13:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98826898

Q98826898: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable with no sitelinks Alexhuff13 (talk) 13:06, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98825390

Q98825390: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable with no sitelinks Alexhuff13 (talk) 13:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98825226

Q98825226: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion Alexhuff13 (talk) 13:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98824946

Q98824946: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not Notable , promotional Rockpeterson (talk) 13:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98824098

Q98824098: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Alexhuff13 (talk) 13:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98822435

Q98822435: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional Alexhuff13 (talk) 13:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98833243

Q98833243: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

What is this? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 14:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98681633

Q98681633: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet notability guidelines Alexhuff13 (talk) 13:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97310625

Q97310625: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97344588

Q97344588: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98381212

Q98381212: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability - deleted multiple times Quakewoody (talk) 13:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98455767

Q98455767: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98807383

Q98807383: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam, no independent sources Jklamo (talk) 12:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98791694

Q98791694: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam, no independent sources Jklamo (talk) 12:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98831471

Q98831471: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Alexhuff13 (talk) 13:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98141308

Q98141308: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I have a doubt of notability of this person , the user who created this page has just made 1 contribution which is created this page . This is some sort of spam . Rockpeterson (talk) 07:12, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

@Rockpeterson: He have to deleted on mrwiki first before here. --Fralambert (talk) 14:12, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by Bencemac (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98582004

Q98582004: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Baby come (talk) 18:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Bencemac (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request Where's my coffee!

  1. Q98821936 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q98822339 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q98822257 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q98822442 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

fails notability Quakewoody (talk) 15:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done Mahir256 (talk) 16:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98808145

Q98808145: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Hasley 16:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98812170

Q98812170: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Hasley 16:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98815052

Q98815052: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doubtful notability. Hasley 16:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98815153

Q98815153: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Hasley 16:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98815396

Q98815396: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Hasley 16:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98831917

Q98831917: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

LTA spam Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 16:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy. --Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 17:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98817288

Q98817288: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Hasley 16:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)


✓ Deleted by Mahir256. --Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 16:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98817137

Q98817137: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Hasley 16:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Mahir256. --Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 16:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98807223

Q98807223: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Test. Hasley 16:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Mahir256. --Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 17:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98807700

Q98807700: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Hasley 16:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Mahir256. --Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 17:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q24196061

Q24196061: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merged with Q11260161 --95.249.12.188 16:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy. --Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 17:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98810667

Q98810667: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Hasley 16:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy. --Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 17:03, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98817449

Q98817449: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Hasley 16:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)\

✓ Deleted by Mahir256. --Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 17:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98822575

Q98822575: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, spam. Hasley 17:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98821931

Q98821931: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Hasley 17:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q28085380

Andrea Volpini (Q28085380): Co-Founder of InSideOut10 and WordLift: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable Trade (talk) 17:43, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:54, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted per backlink —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q11511253

Q11511253: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted on jawiki. Not notable. 本日晴天 (talk) 09:53, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

 Comment I have added external identifiers which are currently not instance of (P31)Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320). --Haansn08 (talk) 01:05, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted per identifiers —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q96694585

Q96694585: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

conflation, split into Q96756341 and Q96749270 --Maria zaos (talk) 13:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

@Maria zaos: I have merged the conflation one. But I am not sure whether Q96694585 and Q96749270 are same. Mainly due to the reason that both have different VIAF ID. I am leaving it to admins for response. Adithyak1997 (talk) 16:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
And I just unmerged the two. We already know they aren't the same people, that is why they were separated. Quakewoody (talk) 16:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q90196090

Q90196090: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a notable person Flixwito^(•‿•)^ 07:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

@Veracious: Before this one is addressed, how many other items by this item's creator (who has been globally locked) should be deleted as well? Mahir256 (talk) 21:34, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
@Mahir256: I haven't checked the yet. Maybe 10+ . Flixwito^(•‿•)^ 13:16, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97516521

Harsh Beniwal (Q97516521): Indian YouTuber: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notablity Rockpeterson (talk) 06:41, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:01, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted per appearances in TV series —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97601349

Q97601349: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This seems to be targeting Zita Ursula Zage, who was born in the 1990s, not in the 1950s. The item is completely fake. It's purpose seem to be to mock her, so please delete this item. --Gereon K. (talk) 20:08, 22 July 2020 (UTC) --Gereon K. (talk) 20:08, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:44, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97671940

Mankirt Aulakh (Q97671940): Punjabi singer and actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks notability Rockpeterson (talk) 07:52, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted per sitelink —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q76294200

Christopher Cumberbatch (Q76294200): Peerage person ID=669068: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability and privacy Iamthecheese44 (talk) 05:14, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:20, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete not notable minor, not anywhere near in the line of succession to QE2. --- Jura 17:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  • We should discuss what "notable" means (even for a recently-born child of celebrity, there may be numerous coverage, though they are usually not significant). As long as this may be useful in infoboxes I will oppose to deletion.--GZWDer (talk) 17:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Worth noting that quite a number of people in the table above have their own Wikipedia articles, or entries in major biographical dictionaries/encyclopedias. The relationships are useful. Even beyond those: in general, the kind of people in TP are exactly the kind of people that it is useful to have in Wikidata and be able to match to, because they are the kind of people who eg turn up again and again in county histories, that one wants to be able to find and record that they founded a school, endowed a church, ran a great estate, became a leading churchman, had a significant military career, had a son who became an MP, etc, etc. It is incredibly useful to have these people in WD (with the biographical/family information to identify them), so that one can find them, match them, and easily record these kinds of statements. Jheald (talk) 18:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted here, but this does explicitly not mean that this item meets the notability criteria. There have been multiple discussions regarding content based on ThePeerage entries which makes it pretty difficult to keep an overview, thus there should be a general discussion at a central place, ideally in an RfC that defines which sort of content from pages like ThePeerage should be considered notable and which not. This discussion also needs to consider the value of family relationship backlinks. —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q96202811

John Paul Ferguson (Q96202811): 1875: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Iamthecheese44 (talk) 07:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:10, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted; reason same as in Special:Diff/1270025102 —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Emmet family members

All  Not deleted; reason same as in Special:Diff/1270025102 —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q75891084

William Emmet (Q75891084): American lawyer (1869-1918): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Iamthecheese44 (talk) 12:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
RAN, the only structural link is with Corneliy Zabriskie (Q75891085) which is also in RFD. So your argument is not valid. See details on Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q75891095. Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 01:58, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Nominating for deletion is not deletion. So long as they exist as a pair, they have a structural need. Also please explain why something is not notable, instead of just saying it is not notable. --RAN (talk) 02:26, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
No, it's up to you to explain why this item is notable and not the other way around. If you can't, the item doesn't respect WD:N. Otherwise everyone can create any item and link it all up by repeating "structural need". And I repeat: all external sites, Peerage included, aren't criteria for deciding the content of WD. The primary purpose is on the home page: Wikidata acts as central storage for the structured data of its Wikimedia sister projects… The goal is not therefore to list the whole World and say everything is notable since it is linked. Tell me why is this notable? —Eihel (talk) 04:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Q75891085

Corneliy Zabriskie (Q75891085): (9 Feb 1871 - certain 11 Jan 1958): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Iamthecheese44 (talk) 07:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:20, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Those structural links were deleted with: this edit --RAN (talk) 22:59, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
No, it is not a structural link in the sense of WD:N, RAN (in addition an Item which is also here). I am convinced by Bovlb through Richard S. Emmet (Q75891081) (more direct link added). —Eihel (talk) 19:33, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep This item formerly had two more inter-item links that the OP removed before requesting deletion. As the links were apparently correct, I have restored them and warned the OP. Bovlb (talk) 17:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Q75891089

Robert Emmet II (Q75891089): Peerage person ID=384414: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Iamthecheese44 (talk) 07:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:10, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep Iamthecheese44 keeps deleting the links between family members, Iamthecheese44 has not indicated that the links are incorrect. I suspect they are being delinked to avoid the auto-save notice for Q-items that are linked to each other. I think we should have a fuller explanation of why they are nominating people, instead of just saying "not notable". --RAN (talk) 03:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Q75891091

Richard Emmet (Q75891091): Peerage person ID=384415: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Iamthecheese44 (talk) 08:00, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:10, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep Iamthecheese44 keeps deleting the links between family members, Iamthecheese44 has not indicated that the links are incorrect. I suspect they are being delinked to avoid the auto-save notice for Q-items that are linked to each other. I think we should have a fuller explanation of why they are nominating people, instead of just saying "not notable". --RAN (talk) 03:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Q75891092

William Emmet (Q75891092): Peerage person ID=384416: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Notability Iamthecheese44 (talk) 08:03, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:06, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep Iamthecheese44 keep deleting the links between family members, Iamthecheese44 has not indicated that the links are incorrect. I suspect they are being delinked to avoid the auto-save notice for Q-items that are linked to each other. I think we should have a fuller explanation of why they are nominating people, instead of just saying "not notable". --RAN (talk) 03:12, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Removing links before nominating is definitely uncool and probably bad faith. We should explicitly ban that practice. Keep just on that ground for this and all other nominations by this nominator. BrokenSegue (talk) 13:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Q75891098

Grenville Temple Emmet III (Q75891098): Peerage person ID=384420: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Iamthecheese44 (talk) 07:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)


Q75891095

Grenville Temple Emmet Jr. (Q75891095): American lawyer (1909-1989): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Iamthecheese44 (talk) 08:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:06, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep structural need via Peerage. If you don't like Peerage entries, take it up at Project Chat instead of diving right into deletion. --RAN (talk) 20:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello RAN, "structural need", it's in relation to WD only (internal links or sitelinks). External sites have no editorial right over WD. The Peerage person ID (P4638) is a property like any other. It's the same for Spotify or IMDb (as I have seen on other RFDs): Items can be deleted even if they are present. WD is not a genealogy, movie, or socializing site. Only the criteria cited in my first sentence are valid criteria. Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 01:54, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 Keep @Eihel: That's factually false. We also need to consider the structural needs of Wikiprojects that may want to use our data to feed their infoboxes and other templates -- that is one of the fundamental raisons d'etre of Wikidata.
In the case of this item, this person is the son of Grenville Temple Emmet I (Q5607533), who has articles on three wikis and a category on Commons. The item is needed so that the person can be named as his child in the corresponding infoboxes for Grenville Temple Emmet I (Q5607533), such as eg the one on WikiCommons. So what we have here is in fact a classic example of structural need. Jheald (talk) 17:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello first of all Jheald, I am only responding to RAN, because - and I stand by what I wrote before and on all similar reviews that I have been able to respond to in this page - the reason is not valid. Instead of your first sentence, what you wanted to write had to be more like "You are right, but you have to keep it because… (the rest of what you write)". What you write is the same as what I write, then you give the correct answer. So if you think you're right, I'm right too. It may be the terms external-internal links that are confusing you. However, they don't want to pretend to express anything else: w: en: Grenville_T._Emmet is an internal link and /www.thepeerage.com/&id=p38442.htm%23i384417 p38442.htm # i384417 is an external link. Only when it is proposed for deletion for the reason "Notability", the internal link is suitable, but the other not. "structural need via Peerage" will never be a sufficient reason to keep an Item. For the reason you mention,  Keep is my opinion on this Item only. (Wait for the next response) Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 18:00, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Wikidata is whatever we collectively choose it to be, and contains the information from whatever database we collectively choose to import. --RAN (talk) 02:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
@Eihel: don't you mean [[user:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|RAN]] over [[ping:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|RAN]]. Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 02:30, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
RAN No, if there is a link to ORCID, it is valid. But WD is not a catch-all. If you want to take things from any site, those objects have to be notable. You cannot decide that everything on Peerage is valid. Linked data is only done internally and what you call structural link is not done outwards. You can put whatever you want on WD, I wouldn't stop you, but it has to respect WD:N. The community has just edited these conventions: this Item does not allow you to link two Items as a "structural link" and the only item to which it's linked is also in RFD. So, wrong, you don't put what you decide on your own if it doesn't respect conventions. I advise you to read WD:N more carefully. Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 03:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
To expand on what I wrote above, the inclusion of at least one degree of separation in each direction (ie father / mother / child / spouse, and at least spouses's parents too) of someone with a Wikipedia article or encyclopedia article or article in a detailed biographical source or of intrinsic notability must be considered to satisfy structural need, because we need those items in order to identify the individuals and make relevant statements on the central item. The peripheral items make those statements possible, otherwise they are not. That is the very essence of structural need. Jheald (talk) 17:44, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello again Jheald, I am even more permissive (inclusive) than you on ascendants and descendants. Lineage has an encyclopedic meaning for me, if only from a cultural point of view. A property of the Identifiers part is not a sufficient reason to keep an Item. Identifiers implies external identifier / link (such as the type of a property for example). If the applicant expresses the reason "Notability" in their request, the requestor should be answered with a reason arising from WD:N. Again The Peerage person ID (P4638) is not a sufficient reason because this reason is not found in WD:N. I can imagine that I no longer looked until the end of each Item present in this page after the nth request with the nth identical reason, but a deletion request that has no valid reason to be kept risks a deletion. RAN needs to keep this in mind. Anyone who gives the reason IMDb or Spotify, it has the same consequence. Spammers will employ the same technique. I have started to pinpoint the problem and it is confirmed in my own request for #Q76302537. RAN writes "We agreed to import The Peerage". No, not everything in Peerage should be included in WD just because The Peerage person ID (P4638) exists. Kind regards. —Eihel (talk) 18:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
A by-the-way example of the usefulness of systematically adding spouse and child information: a query for MPs whose sons/daughters-in-law were also MPs: https://w.wiki/a2A These rather interesting relationships can only be extracted because we have those properties populated with items, almost all of which have come via The Peerage import. Jheald (talk) 19:29, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
I asked very specifically at Project Chat if we had a limit on the degrees of separation from a notable person in Wikidata and the answer was no. Also note that Commons and Wikisource have projects loading and transcribing whole tranches of newspaper and magazines. If people can be identified and are information dense, we should have a entry for them in Wikidata. For instance look at this proto-project to identify WWI military casualties: Commons:File:New Jersey War Dead 1726747 Box1 Folder 29-027.jpg We are veering into the concept of Notability in English Wikipedia, where people need to be famous. Here we just need to people to actually exist with some external reference, to weed out fake entries. --RAN (talk) 18:47, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Not sure I quite go as far as the latter, but yes I think the point about the import or group overall being sufficiently "information dense" as an aggregate was indeed the ultimate prevailing view at Project Chat immediately after ThePeerage import, when the import was allowed to stand. Jheald (talk) 19:29, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Every entry in a phone book, if the notability guidelines are taken literally, absolutely "refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." It doesn't matter if the phone number or address changes, because we can depreciate data. The only that that matters is, a phone book is a serious reference available to the public which identifies a subject (person, business, or government agency). Quakewoody (talk) 06:49, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  • I agree that in theory a phone book is eligible, but we prioritize what we upload, based on the amount of work, and how information dense the data file is. That would be the work to information ratio. All bulk uploads need to be approved by consensus, and we prioritize those uploads. We also have to have a way to disambiguate entries and match entries, and merge duplicates, I am not sure how we would handle 100 or 1,000 John Smiths, based on an outdated now disconnected landline telephone numbers. But you are correct in the that a phone book would be eligible. I say, just not a priority. --RAN (talk) 15:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

General questions about Emmet family members

 Question Is any one of them notable beyond being in TP? --- Jura 07:21, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

@Jura1: Yes.
If we look at the descendents of Robert Emett (Q75891071), see Talk:Q75891071, that is arguably the most meaningful family tree for this discussion, though note that it omits wives of his descendents and also any other ancesty lines of those descendents.
Searching ODNB and DIB in Mix'n'match gives the following https://mix-n-match.toolforge.org/?#/search/emmet?include=1,3347
Beyond these, the entries also record in passing further spouses, parents, children etc that having items here allows us to be able to record.
So those are some of the more notable people in this tree; but I can't exclude that there may be further people who are notable in other ways, published papers or books that we record, may have been closely related to other such people, etc. Jheald (talk) 07:57, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
@Jura1: One thing from these queries that is striking to me is that even though above I thought only six members of the family had bios, it turns out the number is much larger -- and this for a family who were descended from Irish nationalists, rather than the Peerage's typically much more "establishment" figures. (And of course the queries above can only reflect links and matches we know about so far). I think this does support RAN's point that ultimately the community allowed The Peerage import to stand because of the density of people of interest within it, and the value of recording their network. This works for TP because of its specific focus. The same justification would IMO not apply to a broad import for as site like WikiTree person ID (P2949), which has 30x the number of individuals, or FamilySearch person ID (P2889) with perhaps a factor of 50x again -- those would be more like importing the phone book, in a way that TP was not. (However, even for those sites, targeted inclusions of family networks close to people we already have items for might indeed be appropriate; and matching is of course very very welcom). IMO we definitely do not' set out to be a general genealogical site like the latter two. But I do think ThePeerage has a sufficient density of useful items overall, that now it is in it is worth keeping. IMO there are things to do (improving our data, resolving anomalies, identifying and combining more duplicates, matching more external sites, ...) that are far more valuable and productive uses of our time than putting effort into snipping around the edges of the TP import. Jheald (talk) 07:52, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
I don't really recall many arguments from the discussion around TP. The dataset wasn't complete so no detailed analysis was done. I can understand from a British point of view, TP can be interesting to have, but I think one would have a hard time to explain to Charlemagne's descendants why they aren't notable. --- Jura 08:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Do you mean English Wikipedia notable, or Wikidata notable? By definition being in The Peerage makes them Wikidata notable because they are "described using serious and publicly available references". --RAN (talk) 04:56, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
    • I think TP says itself that some of their stuff isn't serious (as just came from some database merge). Besides, in some countries, phone books are a serious business and publicly available. --- Jura 06:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Eligible for upload based on our rules, but not a priority. As for "I think TP says itself that some of their stuff isn't serious", can you please link to that quote from their website. By [not] "serious", do you/they mean fraudulent or whimsical? --RAN (talk) 15:27, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
If I recall it correctly, they couldn't confirm the imported data with actual references. --- Jura 09:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Q97925333

Debrah Ann (Q97925333): American porn star and webcam model: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

First of all, NSFW detected, so those who's editing Wikidata during the work like me, just be careful. :) If in short, it's just a promotion page of a webcam/home porn star, her representative probably confused Wikidata with her own Twitter or Xtube account. It same to the case of Melodie Gore (see above), it seems to fail notability criteria except the point of having the valid sitelink to WM Commons. The Commons pictures were uploaded by a bot (surprising to know that Flickr now accepting obvious NSFW), unclear if they're aligned with the local licensing policy. Your thoughts? --Wolverène (talk) 08:55, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted per Commons sitelink —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q76302535

Count Marc de Lannoy (Q76302535): Peerage person ID=674521: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Notability Iamthecheese44 (talk) 06:55, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted; reason same as in Special:Diff/1270025102 —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q76302539

Victoria de Lannoy (Q76302539): Peerage person ID=674524: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Iamthecheese44 (talk) 06:58, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep structural need. She currently is not linked to the other family members in Wikidata.
I restored the links between family members:

 Not deleted; reason same as in Special:Diff/1270025102 —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q75375926

Comtesse Dorothee de Lannoy (Q75375926): (1956-1956): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability; subject died within a year of birth. Iamthecheese44 (talk) 07:07, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
I have restored the links to other family members, see below:

 Not deleted; reason same as in Special:Diff/1270025102 —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Bulk deletion requests for The Peerage entries

All  Not deleted; reason same as in Special:Diff/1270025102 —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Batch 1
  1. Q76142722 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q75291210 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q75351709 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q76058102 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q76058100 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q75276195 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q76011923 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q75335966 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q76058201 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q75953360 (delete | history | links | logs)
  11. Q75953358 (delete | history | links | logs)
  12. Q75952568 (delete | history | links | logs)
  13. Q76058214 (delete | history | links | logs)
  14. Q76058210 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)
Batch 2
  1. Q76058209 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q75335981 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q76058212 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q76058213 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q75335983 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q75335975 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q76192237 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q76192239 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q75335973 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q75335955 (delete | history | links | logs)
  11. Q75335953 (delete | history | links | logs)
  12. Q75335952 (delete | history | links | logs)
  13. Q75335956 (delete | history | links | logs)
  14. Q75335976 (delete | history | links | logs)
  15. Q76159279 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)
Batch 3
  1. Q76192254 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q76192251 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q76192252 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q75335957 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q75936172 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q75936171 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q75336004 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q75936170 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q75936166 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q75936168 (delete | history | links | logs)
  11. Q75936165 (delete | history | links | logs)
  12. Q75936161 (delete | history | links | logs)
  13. Q75936163 (delete | history | links | logs)
  14. Q75936164 (delete | history | links | logs)
  15. Q75936155 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)
Batch 4
  1. Q75336009 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q75936157 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q75936158 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q75936150 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q75936153 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q75936152 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q75936148 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q75936146 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q75986719 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q75773387 (delete | history | links | logs)
  11. Q75336020 (delete | history | links | logs)
  12. Q75336016 (delete | history | links | logs)
  13. Q75935877 (delete | history | links | logs)
  14. Q75566706 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB) {{cob}}{{cot|Batch 5}} {{rfd links|1=Q76304495|2=Notability}}<nowiki>

Questionable notability. Wikidata/wikipedia is not a genealogy site. Simply having a page on The Peerage does not make a person notable. Iamthecheese44 (talk) 07:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Batch 6
  1. Q75891099 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q75891096 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q76002858 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q75587832 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q75723263 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q76022497 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q75723264 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q75982135 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q75982642 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Fails notability; some violate privacy. Iamthecheese44 (talk) 06:33, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Q76011923

unknown daughter Lyle (Q76011923): Peerage person ID=466229: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Some users seem to be mistaking Wikidata for a genealogy site. Iamthecheese44 (talk) 06:57, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Q76011922

unknown son Lyle (Q76011922): Peerage person ID=466228: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Some users seem to be mistaking Wikidata for a genealogy site. Iamthecheese44 (talk) 06:58, 11 August 2020 (UTC)


@Iamthecheese44: Keep. The time for complaining about these was when the whole site got mass-imported. Whatever the rights and wrongs of how it was done, there was extensive discussion on Project Chat afterwards, and the community took the view that the upload should stand. So it's not appropriate to chip away at it by odds and sods now.
But even on the narrowest reading of WD:N, I don't think you've done your due diligence. Take an item like Ian Lyle (Q75276195) that you have nominated. Father a baronet. Son a baronet. So the item is necessary, at minimum, if one wants to trace how that baronetcy descended, and how the present holder is related to the first holder. In general, IMO at minimum anyone holding a hereditary title in the UK should be considered notable, as should all relatives within one degree of separation.
  • I specifically asked if there was a minimal or maximal degree of separation from one person with Wikidata notability to others, and the answer was "no", so long as they can be defined using external identifiers, to exclude prank entries. Clearly based on the number of Google searches on Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr living relatives alone. It is a common question people ask, on whoever they are interested in, from history. --RAN (talk) 21:04, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Regardless, as I said, the TP items were considered by the community as a whole when they were imported. Now is not the appropriate place to re-litigate that.
One further point: Cutting away family information from this set is also exceedingly unhelpful to ongoing attempts to properly merge and de-duplicate this set. JhealdBatch (talk) 12:48, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
  • "Child born and died the same day" (eg: this deletion) is also not grounds for deletion, because losing a child like that is significant information in respect of the parent, if the parent is notable. Creating such a child item is where that gets recorded on WD. JhealdBatch (talk) 13:24, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
  • [edit conflict] @Iamthecheese44 If you want to nominate something, nominate it. But it makes it really hard to track down who some of these people are when you delete parts of the data from the item. Some of these people are a valid 'structural need', but they look blank because you removed that piece of information. Quakewoody (talk) 12:50, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep Clear structural need for completing family trees. As pointed out above, the time to question was when the project was proposed for upload. And as I pointed out previously, English Wikipedia notability rules about genealogy are not Wikidata notability rules about genealogy. It would have been better to pose this as a question at Project Chat rather than dive into deletion. See Commons:Queen_Elizabeth_II as an example of an extended family tree. Wikidata is more interested that something actually exists, rather than how famous it is. --RAN (talk) 19:56, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
  • I wasn't around when this all got imported but I have no idea how it meets the notability standards. I'd be ok with deleting them all or revising the notability standards. Clearly not all of these serve a legit structural need. Maybe some do but the mass import was a bad idea and just creates confusion. BrokenSegue (talk) 11:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete Q76011923 and Q76011922, not notable. --- Jura 02:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep. per RAN. The import was a mess, but now that it's here many of us have done significant work in adding to these entries, linking them to other items or images, and creating trees which depend on many minor links in the form of "non-notable" items. Gamaliel (talk) 17:25, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep The import of Peerage predates my time working on Wikidata and I have occasionally been annoyed by these entries, but they clearly serve a structural purpose. For that reason alone they should be kept. William Graham (talk) 19:16, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think they should be look at in detail. It's clear that items related to people with hereditary functions in the UK and elsewhere are different from items about people born long after such functions existed. Merely basing notability for living people on an identifier in one or the other genealogical databases can be seen as a systematic bias in Wikidata. --- Jura 19:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Classic reductio ad absurdum, Phone books are not information dense, they contain a name and a telephone number and an address. Telephone numbers and addresses are not permanent identifiers, so we just have a name. We also need to disambiguate people of the same name, there would be no way to match people in a phone book to existing entries. However a school yearbook would have one additional piece of information. It would have an approximate birth year and an education= entry. Even then it would not be information dense, just having two properties. I believe at one point we considered uploading the Callum database of West Point graduates, but went with a mix-and-match to existing records. --RAN (talk) 18:21, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Summary If we don't want some TP entries, come up with some objective criteria for deletion and get consensus for it, and we can have a bot delete them. What is going on here is subjective deletion with all the inherent biases that come with a single person deleting what they do not find interesting. If everyone got to delete what did not interest them, there would be nothing left in Wikidata. --RAN (talk) 05:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
    • We have notability rules that are objective already. This fails notability since it has no serious external reference and isn't needed for structural reasons. BrokenSegue (talk) 13:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
      • (mostly)  Keep Isn't the site itself an external reference? Considering there is an identifier property for it would make it seem so. That being said, I seem to remember some items from TP that I found lacking, although I don't quite remember why. Is it them that sometimes include questionable data marked with a "(?)"? If individual items are of low quality, they should be deleted. And if anyone wants to make a case that there are systemic quality problems with the data, more extensive deletion would be plausible. But only for quality reasons, not notability. --Matthias Winkelmann (talk) 17:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Q66023260

Maryland Insurance Administration (Q66023260): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability issues in the current form MisterSynergy (talk) 19:35, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

I don't think this should be deleted. The subject meets WP:N on English Wikipedia, it's just a red link. I added some identifiers. TJMSmith (talk) 11:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted; thanks for the improvements —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q64639286

baseline water stress (Q64639286): the ratio of total water withdrawals relative to the annual available renewable surface water supplies: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability issues in the current form MisterSynergy (talk) 19:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

@MisterSynergy:, I've added several other sources establishing notability. my main issue with this item is I don't know how to model this concept in Wikidata, any ideas? --John Cummings (talk) 21:18, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted; thanks for the improvements —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q76302537

Jessica Home (Q76302537): (died 2015): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks of WD:N: no structural need (links are too in RFD); Peerage is not a sufficient reason to keep this item. Eihel (talk) 03:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep We agreed to import The Peerage, I am not sure why we are deleting some, and not others. Rather than deleting them on an ad hoc basis, why don't we get consensus as to why some should be deleted, and some kept at Project chat. --RAN (talk) 04:47, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
RAN, I don't think there is any need for Chat anymore with your last intervention. In your sentence: We agreed to import The Peerage, could you tell me where it's written precisely "import the Peerage" ? Then if you want to talk to me, you can notify me, because I can't be everywhere. Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 05:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
I think it is potentially quite useful to be able to use {{Wikidata/FamilyTree}} on any wiki, to show immediately how Jessica Home fits in to that famlly, because now that we have the data here we can immediately do that
⛭
Jacques-François Adrien Graaf de Lannoy[d]
Gustave de Lannoy[d]
Louise Marie Charlotte Gravin van Ursel[d]
Count Charles de Lannoy[d]
M.L. markies van der Noot van Assche[d]
Countess Marie van der Noot d'Assche[d]
Albertine Josèphe Claire Roose de Baisy[d]
Count Maurice de Lannoy[d]
Louis Marie du Parc, Seigneur de Keramelin[d] Count Marc de Lannoy[d]
Alain, Vicomte du Parc[d] Louise, Viscountess of Spoelberch[d]
Victoria de Lannoy[d]
Marie Gabrielle Le Rouge de Guerdavid[d]
Countess Marie du Parc[d] Douglas Home[d] Jessica Home[d]
Pierre Alexandre van Volden de Santberg[d]
Zenaïde van Volden[d]
Pauline Marie Therese d'Hannosset[d]
Link: Snapshot image of the above as of 2020-08-20
This means that if, for example, we get photos of any of these people on Commons, we can add a family tree to the page to show how they are.
The other point I would make is that it may be quite early to judge whether particular people from The Peerage import are significant, or have close ties to people who were significant. In the last three months, after the bulk upload, we have matched 25,000 TP items to non-TP items that had been pre-existing before that date, almost doubling the number; and that process is still going on at pace - in the last week, a further 3000 items have been matched. And having started looking at eg English baronets last week, I know there are still a huge number of matches to be made. So, in general, just because a TP item doesn't appear to be closely connected to anyone with lots of external links right now, that does not mean that that item will never have such links: often it may turn out to have such potential connnections, it's just that the necessary merges haven't yet been identified and made to bring them out yet. (Also, the more family links that are left in, the more chance there is of finding and tracking down these crucial merges).
Secondly, it's worth noting that the identification and linking of people depicted on Commons is still only at quite an early stage. So at the moment it is hard to be really sure whether any item here may or may not still turn out to be useful, eg for Commons SDC.
Would I have prioritised importing the whole of TP when User:GZWDer did, back at the start of the year? Maybe not. But now that the items do exist, I see no value to be gained by deleting them. At the very least, let's leave them in place for at least another few months, rather than destroy potentially useful information, until have done more linking, and can get a more certain idea of which items really may or may not be close to other items of interest. Jheald (talk) 11:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  • (I wasn't here for the Peerage discussion) - Having been disconnected from my lineage, I only recently found out that I am a descendant of Q3044 (illegitimate/bastard child), we have a town named after us, and at least 2 of our family castles have WP articles. Quakewoody (talk) 12:57, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  • I was told that just about everyone in The Netherlands can claim to be his family. So, that part is not a big deal to me. But not everyone can say they have town named after them or that their castles are featured on WP. Quakewoody (talk) 16:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
    • A town is generally not named after a living person (unless one is incredibly old or totalitarian). There are plenty of family names that somehow relate to place names. Wikidata allows to do quite a lot in that field. Still, I don't think we need to create an item for everyone with such a name. Statements can be made on items for the names. --- Jura 17:23, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Ultimate reply Jheald, We are all sons and daughters of 2 people, but the last answers make you understand that we don't all have a place in WD. The unknown great granddaughter of someone with a WP page, is that your reply? It's a bit light. We will not go back to Methuselah (Q156290) either!
    • So if an item respects WD:N, it can be kept.
    • If someone can't find notoriety for an item, they place it here. If another contributor wants to counter this deletion, a valid argument must be given. Peerage is not one, RAN. And it is the one who wants to keep the Item who must express that he respects WD:N : the requester has already hypothesized that notoriety is not respected. Show him he's wrong, it's more rewarding.
    • Just like "Peerage person ID = XXXXX" are not valid descriptions, User:GZWDer.
    • It is better to make pages on other projects (which can be given as a pledge within the meaning of WD:N) before risking having his work destroyed here.
    • Here, a contrario the previous request, WD:N is still not respected.
    • I was waiting for a response from RAN. There is no discussing what can be taken from Peerage, WD:N already does. The great cousin of an unknown person has no place in the project. If you want an Item to have its place, WD:N must be changed. Afterwards, you will reply me that WD:N is respected by point X through the fact that we have the right to put "the great cousin of an unknown person".
    • IMDb, Spotify, Youtube still don't have editorial rights here and that will never change. So avoid giving this opinion to keep an Item, because it is inadmissible, RAN, here and on all other requests. If I find an reply like this, I would tend to vote for deletion, without even looking to see if the request is valid.
    • Reply me in the respect of conventions and I would bow, quite simply. Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 18:37, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
You constantly say an entry violates Wikidata:Notability but never express exactly how it is in violation. It is similar to holding up a bible and telling me the answer is in here, without specifying a chapter or a verse. Everything at Wikidata:Notability is numbered to make it easier to refer to. Rule 2: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." --RAN (talk) 18:48, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
First of all, I was not the one who asked the majority of these requests on these families (in fact I made only one, this one). Those who filed these requests mostly write "Notoriety", so go to those. When rules dictate WHAT to respect and you ask what is not being respected, I question myself strongly and I return the question to you. Where is it not being respected, you ask? Everywhere, since someone writes to you that it is not respected! You took as an explanation "structural need via Peerage" until now, that doesn't mean anything and "structural need" is not in n° 2. Your example is even more confusing. An exact example would be: they tell you it's not in the Bible and you answer "structural need via Torah" !? Which means that you have consulted them (at least partially) and you have been able to give me a more convincing reply. For rule 2, we hit another problem: "I put it in my sauce" with "described using serious and publicly available references", even if it doesn't suit everyone. Because not all conventions are "up to date". So that WD is not a garbage can. Because in all properties with "authority record" I don't necessarily include everything. GZWDer, this is what I am designing here, right now: if you find me a
  • ascendants to the third level or
  • descendants to the second level or
  • first cousins,
which is notable in the Wikipedian sense, I bow down. I can't do better. Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 01:15, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
GZWDer —Eihel (talk) 01:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
The issue is: Are there sources describing the relationship? If yes, this person belongs to Wikidata. On one hand, vital records described almost everyone (this does not mean it is now the time to create items for all people, as scalibility is an issue - see Wikidata:Requests_for_comment/Handle_genealogical_information), but some are described in additional sources; on the other hand, there are no modern people with documented descent from any of (suggested) common ancestors of all humans such as Adam and Eve.--GZWDer (talk) 22:12, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted; reason same as in Special:Diff/1270025102 —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q47525336

Michel Belin (Q47525336): French magistrate: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Part of a series of non-notable items, not very good coverage Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 16:10, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q25374128

Q25374128: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Redundant, Correa (disambiguation) is correct Estopedist1 (talk) 08:34, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98520228

Q98520228: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not Notable , promotional Rockpeterson (talk) 14:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q65322392

Q65322392: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty, linked artice in ml wiki got deleted. Kiran Gopi (talk) 18:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q65323684

Q65323684: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty, linked article deleted from ml wiki. Kiran Gopi (talk) 18:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98515962

Q98515962: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 01:24, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97577463

Vincent Le Pannerer (Q97577463): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item, non-notable Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 02:04, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97577469

Stéphane Chassard (Q97577469): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item, non-notable Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 02:10, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97577687

GVAOT (Q97577687): winery: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 02:17, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97578322

Kadma (Q97578322): winery: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 02:35, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97574246

Louis Marie Emmery (Q97574246): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 00:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97575537

Q97575537: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 00:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:30, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97575532

Q97575532: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 00:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98502580

Q98502580: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 00:30, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

I dont find sources that make this entity notable also the user 103.211.18.77 who created this item has only created one wikidata item that is of this entity . So I think it is a promotion Rockpeterson (talk) 06:57, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Most 'entrepreneurs' on WD are going to be promotional items unless they have an enWP article. It's SEO 101, promote yourself on WD. Also, an IP editor having one edit is not a big deal to me.Quakewoody (talk) 21:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97575573

Q97575573: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 00:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:50, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97575860

Q97575860: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 00:32, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97577060

Q97577060: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 00:38, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97577262

Q97577262: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 00:39, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97577273

Q97577273: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 00:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

  •  Delete All references cited are paid articles . How ORCID id is used as an identifier for an entity who is a musician . I also have a doubt that the item is created by a sock and I have reported for checkuser [1] .Rockpeterson (talk) 05:48, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

References

  1. ↑ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser#Prestigepopli
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97577309

Q97577309: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Half-empty, no notability Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 00:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97577327

Q97577327: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 00:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98515354

Q98515354: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 01:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98515331

Q98515331: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 01:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:30, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97584337

Q97584337: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 02:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97584382

Q97584382: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 02:10, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q62066266

Sibylle Braungardt (Q62066266): researcher: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No information at all Bahnmoeller (talk) 12:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
I see some structural need here ^. Rafael (stanglavine) msg 00:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted per backlinks —MisterSynergy (talk) 22:06, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98442782

Q98442782: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears to not be notable, but linked from eswiki Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 15:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

  • The eswp article was hijacked. I've restored it. Now I need to track where the original item is so that I can re-point the article to it. Quakewoody (talk) 15:54, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
  • WOW. I tried looking at this. The people who messed with the eswp article messed with many articles/items. I can't even pretend to follow it. Quakewoody (talk) 16:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
  • (Let me sum this up) The es article is for a legitimate person (Person A), but the article had been hijacked a few months ago (Person B). The item was created for Person B.
I restored the article. But I did not remove the link to the article so that other fixers can have it as an easy reference for their attempts to fix the situation. Quakewoody (talk) 16:57, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Restored entirely upon request at the administrators' noticeboard. —Hasley 17:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97842536

Q97842536: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks of WD:N. See also Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q97515903 and Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q97516324 by the same contributor. Thanks in advance. --Eihel (talk) 05:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 Delete The links don't matter, as both were created by the same person and one of them is in the "delete" section. —Eihel (talk) 13:22, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
  • They both should be in the delete section. If the 2nd one isn't, it is because the category obviously doesn't need to exist if the person doesn't exist.
I have mentioned on another item discussion, so I will say it here - instead of looking at the nominations, we should simply delete everything he created to make sure we didn't miss nominating anything. Quakewoody (talk) 13:49, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Spotify and IMDb aren't a sufficient reason to keep this item (they have no editorial rights on WD, otherwise any Youtuber with 10 subscribers would be on WD). —Eihel (talk) 04:02, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Do we know that, as example, if Andy Johnson appears on a album, he will be given an entry on Spotify if the album gets added. AND, if a different Andy Johnson appears on another album, he will be added to that same listing. Thus, Andy Johnson will look like he has two albums.
I have even seen 'verified artists' that have messed up entries. And IMDb is nothing more than a wiki. In fact, you can get IMDb for YouTube videos. Quakewoody (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
That's an example, RAN, and it's not against you. This is to say that outward links have no weight in the decision. I wrote this to you multiple times before you added your line. Again, Properties related to IMDb, Spotify, Youtube, Peerage and most of the other properties of the external identifier part have no decision-making power in this page, and in our pages. You really need to review WD:N: "structural link" doesn't mean "external link". And external link means completely external to WM. So stop using that argument. The contributor adds a lot of irrelevant Item (read his talk page). I would also like you to add a {{Vd}}, please Quakewoody, to avoid ending up with this useless item. Best regards. —Eihel (talk) 20:11, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  • That Youtube videos get entries should not surprise you, there is YouTube Premium where Youtube produces their own movies. If you think any/every Youtube entry gets a IMDB entry, I challenge you to upload a video to Youtube and then get an IMDB entry for it and post it below. --RAN (talk) 23:57, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98459278

Q98459278: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 23:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98468790

Protestant church Klebitz (Q98468790): church building in Klebitz, part of municipality and township Zahna-Elster, in Saxony-Anhalt, Germany: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 23:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:20, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 Keep Seem notable. At least there is a church at this point in OSM. --Fralambert (talk) 01:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 22:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98457785

Q98457785: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 23:36, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q93977481

Q93977481: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wait for local deletion Quakewoody (talk) 09:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q91131812

DripReport (Q91131812): Pakistani American singer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wait for local deletion Quakewoody (talk) 09:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted per sitelink —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98497317

Hank Smith (Q98497317): American professional musician, university teacher, and recording artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 17:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98512629

Q98512629: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 22:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
@Prahlad balaji: The username of the user who created this wikidata item is same as the entity name . This is a clear self Promotion . Rockpeterson (talk) 14:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

@Rockpeterson: Right. And he's probably part of a sockfarm of about a dozen others. Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 14:42, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q98270879

Jan Zbigniew Potocki (Q98270879): Polish businessperson and YouTuber: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fake data, it is not president of Poland and never was (self proclaiming is not value for encyclopedia) IOIOI (talk) 22:47, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:50, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted; meets notability requirements per identifiers, but a verification of the data would be necessary —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q75720989

Mary Alice Guinness (Q75720989): (1863-1949): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 23:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not deleted here per backlinks; a general discussion about such content is necessary —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q97574920

Q97574920: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 00:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q50621835

Q50621835: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty, linked templates were deleted because club was dissolved. Alex (talk) 22:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q88458787

Q88458787: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, social media promoting, Spam Baby come (talk) 18:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q31703079

Q31703079: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty Kiran Gopi (talk) 18:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q25587396

Q25587396: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty, linked article is deleted from mlwiki. Kiran Gopi (talk) 19:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q25588559

Q25588559: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty, linked article deleted from mlwiki as lack of notability Kiran Gopi (talk) 19:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Q76824325

Q76824325: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Obvious vandalism. Only edited by anons and vandals (and me), only one Wikilink to a nonsense page on eswp. Partially a copy of Q4468673 --Sabelöga (talk) 20:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

The only wikilink has now been deleted on eswp, btw. --Sabelöga (talk) 22:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2020/09/02&oldid=1270177634"