Jump to content

Wikidata:Requests for deletions

Shortcut: WD:RFD
From Wikidata


Pages tagged with {{Delete}}

[edit]

None at the moment

Click here to purge if this list is out of date.

Requests

[edit]

Please add a new request at the bottom of this section, using {{subst:Rfd |1=PAGENAME |2=REASON FOR DELETION }}.


Bulk deletion request regarding Tech SEO Summit

[edit]

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:22, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I spend quite some time adding popular online marketing podcasts (see my contribution list) that are all in talk show format, episodes, hosts, prominent talk show guests and background information and multiple of them now show inbound links from this deletion request. Seeing this is quite frustrating. I am quite new to wikidata and don't fully understand why you would want to delete this information. From what I understand some of my entries miss sitelinks to match the notability guidelines and I need to connect them e.g. add the podcasts e.g to the list of german podcasts (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:German_podcasts) so they fullfill the notability guideline. I am willing to work on that.
I also want to make some points about the notability of some items of your deletion list:
Q127775949 - Michael King is the person that exposed one of the biggest leaks about the Google Algorithm from the last years, together with Rand Fishkin (https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Michael+King%22+google+leak)
Q127790498 - Roxana Stingu is quite a public figure in the women in tech movement.
Q125523927 - Audisto and it's CTO / CEO are quite known for their work regarding tech SEO with citation of work published by Audisto in the Wikipedia (https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Awikipedia.org+audisto) going back to 2015. They are especially known for their detailed guides (https://audisto.com/guides/)
-- Q125397892 - This is the german version of an article originally published by Audisto and written by Tobias Schwarz (Q124868557) and Christian Müller (https://audisto.com/guides/canonical/), that is also cited in the English Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_link_element#cite_note-Audisto_GmbH-3)
Most of the other speakers listed at the Tech SEO Summit entry could also be connected to popular podcasts. I would also be willing to work on that. PodcastMage (talk) 05:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I added multiple contributions and references from and to entities of the two batches indicating the affiliation with already existing entities within Wikidata and Wikipedia. For some of the entities there are citations of their work within Wikipedia, however I do not know if the citations should be changed to use the Cite_Q-Template (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_Q) in this case. PodcastMage (talk) 13:52, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Popularity on its own is not relevant for judging the notability of an item in the Wikidata sense. Linking items together that are not notable without these links is also not a good way to prove notability. Also, self published sources are usually not considered serious as demanded by WD:N #2. Can you add independent coverage from serious sources, e. g. from mainstream media etc.? --Dorades (talk) 19:55, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Got the point. So with independent coverage from serious sources you mean this (https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q127775949&diff=2222443545&oldid=2222044321), right? Is this the right spot to add these references and is this amount of references adequate (there are plenty more out there, but I only added the ones I considered most relevant to prove the point) or should there be more? Is this enough in terms of notability for you to keep Michael King and how about the fact that he talks about exactly the topic he got the news coverage for at the Tech SEO Summit? If this changes your opinion about some of the items, please update your batches to reflect that and I will see if similar references can be found for the remaining items. Note: First I was only interested in the podcasts and the corresponding items I added, but now you got me hooked to prove the point for more items of your deletion request because to me they are relevant background, but I totally get that they need to be considered relevant by other people e.g. you as well. PodcastMage (talk) 05:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I added references (that are in my opinion serious sources) regarding the notability of Audisto (https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q125523927&diff=2222723884&oldid=2212511540) and also it's CEO (https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q125187894&diff=2222541861&oldid=2222008770). PodcastMage (talk) 16:52, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Generally speaking, references should support a specific claim, e. g. when someone is called "SEO expert" the respective source should be used for the statement that someone has the occupation (P106): SEO specialist (Q4048723). There is no limit on how many sources can be added (as far as I know), but some contributors think that a handful of references is enough to support one single claim. Only considering the most relevant ones is a good approach in my opinion.
The notability for Michael King (Q127775949) seems borderline to me, based on the references you added. But for me it's enough to mark my RFD for Michael King (Q127775949) as  Withdrawn. I can't judge the reliability of Website Boosting (Q120468799), thus I am also marking Audisto (Q125523927) as  Withdrawn. I am not convinced by the references for Sören Bendig (Q125187894). In the end, it's not up to me to decide to keep or to delete these items, but to the admins. --Dorades (talk) 15:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification, this helps me a lot! From my understanding adding the founders and the CEO of a company would be considered "structural need", as it completes important information about a company and therefore makes it more useful, right? With the same intention I added individual episodes to podcasts where persons that I consider important or that already had Wikidata entries appeared. Regarding Sören Bendig (Q125187894): I also added the information that he was deputy chairman and later chairman of one of the committies of the German Association for the Digital Economy (Q1008864), a association where large companies like Deutsche Telekom, ProSiebenSat.1 Media and RTL Deutschland are members (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Q1008864). Regarding Michael King (Q127775949): I will try to add more references about him in the future to address your doubts. Regarding Website Boosting (Q120468799): It is a well known magazine in the German online marketing szene since 2010 and with 17,500 copies printed every two months. In addition the editor in chief is a well known professor who founded two degree programs at the FH Würzburg - University of Applied Sciences. I will also try to add more references about him in the future. Hopefully I find some time at the weekend. PodcastMage (talk) 18:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When working on the references for Michael King (Q127775949): I discovered that he is also known as a rapper and there is another Wikidata entry for him Mic King (Q112819455). I think those two entries should be merged. I added some of his music profiles to the first entity. PodcastMage (talk) 11:18, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I merged the two entities of Michael King. In addition I added references for both, René Dhemant (Q127776614) and Tobias Schwarz (Q124868557). René Dhemant is a lecturer at the AFS Academy, which was launched in 2012 as the first state-approved training course for search engine optimization (https://www.websiteboosting.com/fileadmin/user_upload/2013/_19/PDF/028-029_afs_website_boosting_019.pdf) in Germany. Tobias Schwarz was also a lecturer there in the early days of the academy, as the article shows. I have added the relevant references. I have also added further references for René Dhermant, such as his participation in podcasts, and also some for Tobias Schwarz. I will work on the remaining profiles as soon as I find a little more time, as this is all quite time consuming. PodcastMage (talk) 11:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I finished my work adding references and background to the main entries of this deletion request and my opinion is to keep the entries as most of them refer to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references. I consider the rest of the entries to fulfill a structural need as they are all clearly connected to other entries that are not marked for deletion and make these entries more valuable. All statements I found in the entries were valid and understandable to me. Most of the persons within this deletion request are well known conference speakers, have appearances as experts in their field of work in multiple podcasts (all listed within the linked podchaser profiles; not all of them are present at Wikidata), are lecturers or have demonstrably held positions in organizations that are already present on Wikidata. If individual entries are still considered not notable, I would welcome separate deletion requests being made for these entries instead of continuing to pursue this bulk deletion request. My work is done here and I'll move on to work on other things now. I consider the state of this ready for a decision by the admins. PodcastMage (talk) 08:10, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Someone added a hashtag to the entry, which allowed me to add 4 more references that show that the event actually took place. A follow up event seems to be planned for 2025. PodcastMage (talk) 17:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Notability alone shouldn't be abused for verifiable data objects. WD:N clearly says: "2. It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references." Inspecting a random number of Q's referred by the requester:
I don't like any motivation to delete or clean other users' good-faith contributions. Wikidata is designed for the future and will always rely on users' contributions. We should welcome verifiable data of clearly identifiable entities, and people who contribute time and effort in sharing public-domain data to the world. XsLiDian (talk) 01:13, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you should consider good faith yourself before calling an objective discussion an abuse of the notability criteria. If you think that our notability criteria as they are written down are problematic I recommend seeking consensus to change them. --Dorades (talk) 19:39, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
FYI: I'm well-behaved by myself and totally agrees with the current Project guidelines. The notability criteria are totally non-controversial for me. Also good for these two batches contributed by good-faith users. XsLiDian (talk) 16:07, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not entering about the matter of the question, I can read any accusation of lack of good faith in "Notability alone shouldn't be abused for verifiable data objects", but just the statement of a disagreement about the reach of the argument - that is, when "notability alone" should be used and when using it is to stretch it to far (to abuse that argument).
Anyway, this discussion should be less about good faith and more about wheter thoses items are useful in Wikidada accordording to Wikidata policies. Pere prlpz (talk) 15:05, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q105698122

[edit]

International Cost Conference (Q105698122): conference series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wild mixture of various irrelevant events without clear contunitiy MGChecker (talk) 12:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:01, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q27987555

[edit]

Q27987555: church building in Gorla Minore, Italy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-existent building Yiyi .... (talk!) 08:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yiyi Are you saying this is a made-up building? It's in heritage registers... Ping @Nvitucci the creator of this item. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 08:25, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Vojtěch Dostál It could be a church with a different name, but in Gorla Minore there aren't buildings with this name AND all the other churches in Gorla Minore are yet on Wikidata. I live nearby and I also did some research: definitely it doesn't exist. Yiyi .... (talk!) 12:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What if it existed but was demolished? Then it would still deserve to have an item... Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 14:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Vojtěch Dostál I think Q116943131 could be the same church. I have no informations about churches demolished in Gorla Minore. Yiyi .... (talk!) 08:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like an erroneous duplicate of the preceeding QID Q27987554 Uschoen (talk) 20:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If it's a duplicate it should be merged instead of deleted, and instead of deleting all its properties. Pere prlpz (talk) 15:07, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q111243654

[edit]

Voorhees (Q111243654): male given name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a real given name. --StarTrekker (talk) 10:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:11, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I was able to find 16 people on Wikidata with this given name (though admittedly, none with it as the first or primary given name). --Quesotiotyo (talk) 14:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Quesotiotyo: Are you sure these are actual given names, not just someone having two or more surnames?StarTrekker (talk) 14:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@StarTrekker Yes, as the family names for these people were all clearly evident (and only one was a married woman, otherwise they likely would not have more than one surname).
--Quesotiotyo (talk) 14:47, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Quesotiotyo: That is very untrue, it's not unusual at all for people to have more than one surname, in several cultures it's even the standard. Even among English speakers it's not unusul for persons to have both a paternal and a maternal family name before marriage.StarTrekker (talk) 16:05, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Quesotiotyo: you labeled Abram Voorhees Stout (Q116933137) who was born to Jacob VanDoren Stout and Helen (Voorhees) Stout as having the given name Voorhees.
Richard Voorhees Risley (Q56702133) was born to Mary Coraline Voorhees Risley and John Ewing Risley and you also labeled him as having it as a given name. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 13:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Correct, as those are middle names (second given names). The family names come from their fathers, not their mothers. --Quesotiotyo (talk) 18:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, they seem very obviously to be cases of family name inherited from mother (Q25918333).StarTrekker (talk) 01:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: 277 Systematic internaliser (SI) items

[edit]

query

Se background below for what a Systematic internaliser is.

These are the reasons:

  • 1) These SIs can change over time and I have not seen anyone interested in keeping this information updated since the import was done.
  • 2) they are a role on an existing firm and should never have been imported as separate items IMO. This import was probably not sufficiently discussed before it was done.
  • 3) The level of detail in the SI system is not relevant for Wikidata or the WMF projects. It is similar to importing every bench in every protected area in Sweden into Wikidata as an item. That does not make much sense to keep in Wikidata.

If anyone would like to keep this data I suggest they create a financial Wikibase and model the whole thing there based on the companies/markets in Wikidata.

I understand a lot of time and work has gone into this import. I suggest to the importer that they discuss imports more before forging ahead to avoid deletions in the future.

Here is the background: "[...] investment firms can choose to become an SI in a given financial instrument or group of financial instruments. As of 1 September 2018, investment firms will be mandatorily classified as an SI in those financial instruments which they have traded frequently, systematically and substantially. The SI status will be evaluated continuously in terms of business needs and regulatory requirements." source

So SI is a status of a company in a certain market. It was introduced by regulatory bodies in 2018 AFAIK.

It would be a lot of work to to keep this information up to date. Take a look at the products the SI-status apply, see [1] for an example (there are a total of 24 products listed there)

Notifying users which have discussed the import before @BrokenSegue, @Vladimir Alexiev @User:Nataliya Keberle --So9q (talk) 12:01, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The number of possible items with MIC market code (P7534) is unlikely to be close to "every bench in every protected area in Sweden" (unless Sweden has very few benches). There is also an identifier for them, which is why the items were created; benches are unlikely to be registered with a central authority. I agree they should probably not be separate items, but the identifiers should be moved to existing items or new items. Peter James (talk) 21:49, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am firmly against deletion. If MIC found them important enough to issue a MIC ID, then they should be important enough for WD as well.
  • "they are a role on an existing firm and should never have been imported as separate items"
  • "not seen anyone interested in keeping this information updated": We've updated MIC import 3x. And can you point to any WD subset of over 1k entities that is completely up to date with its source data?
  • "SI is a status of a company in a certain market": That's not true. SIs are a specific sort of stock exchange or market. Many financial institutions perform various services, including specific kinds of exchanges and markets. "SI" is an important role to warrant its own type, just like "stock exchange" or "pension fund"
  • "The level of detail in the SI system is not relevant for Wikidata": Do you also argue that "there are too many exchanges", thus they are not interesting?
  • "I suggest they create a financial Wikibase": this is just discrimination! Why would you be the person to decide how much financial info is appropriate for WD?
Cheers! -- Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 12:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
  1. even if they are different companies, they still don't seem relevant to have in WD (from my perspective).
  2. the first example you mention is interesting. I found the scope of the BBVA when acting as a SI. Reading that it is clear that SI is a role that is chosen by the entity:
BBVA has voluntarily decided to act as SI for certain bonds and other forms of securitised debt and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts, in accordance with article 18 of MiFIR.
So a SI is not a company per se. It is a role and that role ONLY applies to certain products and services. They differ between SIs.
IF we were to keep this information a data consumer would DEFINITELY want to know which type of products this entity acts as SI for. In the case of Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria Bank (Q806189) the import was done from a database that did not contain links between the bank and the SI role (voluntarily chosen by the bank). Without this information I would consider this a good example of a bad import. That is an import that inflates the number of items in Wikidata but fails to connect them to other items in a way that makes good sense to keep over time.
I invite others to judge whether these role-items are worth having or if they could be better reduced to a single statement like so on the entity that takes on that role according to some source like the one I provided above:
role -> systematic interalizer -> start time = x, applies to = product x, applies to = service y, MIC market code = BBVA, etc.
Please note that it is much easier to polute a database with half-ass imports than it is to find a good source and add statements like the above for each SI in the database. IMO this should have been discussed in a WikiProject Finance (does not exist yet) or WikiProject Economics, but I assume it has not, please correct me if I'm wrong and provide a link to the discussion about modeling in that case.
I suggest we delete these garbage items and use this an example of how not to do an import. So9q (talk) 09:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q50375445

[edit]

Ago Endre (Q50375445): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Bot-created Estopedist1 (talk) 21:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:41, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
May be mentioned in Kes on kes? Eesti 2000 (an Estonian biographical dictionary? see the reference for P31), I am not sure I am able to check if he was mentioned, but if there is an article about him he has to be notable. --Wolverène (talk) 06:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Notable as linked to Sirje Endre (Q12375095) and sourced per above (in Sirje Endre (Q12375095) item father (P22) statement). 178.37.233.37 00:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q123951730

[edit]

Iztochna tangenta blvd. (Q123951730): street in Sofia, Bulgaria: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability - this is a proposed reorganization of Q123951730 Nk (talk) 16:31, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notability - this is a proposed reorganization of Q123946927 Nk --Nk (talk) 16:53, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The reason is unclear. Is Iztochna tangenta blvd. (Q123951730) a duplicate of Iztochna tangenta (Q123946927)? Or the former is just a part of the later? Pere prlpz (talk) 15:10, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q130234847

[edit]

Jenan Younis (Q130234847): British comedian and physician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Someone claiming to be Dr Younis requested this entry's deletion, but didn't do it properly. This is just a procedural correction; I'll add her reasoning in a moment. DS (talk) 15:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I would be grateful if this page could be removed about me (see above)
I was alerted that it was just added.
I am no longer a comedian and no longer a surgeon either and would be grateful if the page could be deleted. I am working full time in the NHS and such pages existing will be considered a breach of professionalism and may result in NHS disciplinary action against me. I don’t know who added the page but would be grateful if it could be taken down as soon as possible. Many thanks
Jenan Younis <email deleted>" DS (talk) 15:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per this interview, Dr. Younis is "a BBC New Voices Competition winner and Funny Women finalist", and a search of Google News shows enough media coverage that she might even meet notability criteria for enwiki. I also note the apparent contradiction between "no longer a surgeon" and "working full time in the NHS". If there is indeed a "breach in professionalism" such that it could result in "disciplinary action", surely it was when she began performing standup, or when she organized and launched a MENA-themed comedy festival; our documentation is only a minimal component thereof. DS (talk) 15:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the contradiction you stated - there are many other professions other than surgeon within the nhs. It’s not unheard of to change specialties/departments. Therefore it’s possible to work full time in the nhs and no longer be a surgeon. I’m sure you can appreciate that I’d rather not share private documentation that would be prove the issue with professionalism/potential disciplinary action that would be lodged against me. If you search online you can see I have no future gigs planned and haven’t had any scheduled for quite some time. I would be most grateful if the entry on me would be deleted. 2.26.231.49 00:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do not see anything that would "be considered a breach of professionalism". --RAN (talk) 18:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It’s also very presumptuous if you to assume you know what consists of a breach of professionalism. This entry is about me and I have asked politely if you could remove it as it poses a risk to my current employment and income on grounds of professionalism. As I explained I am no longer a surgeon nor a comedian so the content of the page itself is also inaccurate. I would be grateful if you would delete it please. I do not want to have to escalate the matter to a legal team. 2.26.231.49 08:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The sources are out there. Are you going to ask the BBC and the Guardian to take down their coverage of you? DS (talk) 17:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Some IP address just posted a comment at Talk:Q130234847. Samoasambia ✎ 19:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep While we should certainly remove any information that is private or unverifiable, it seems like this person is notable. Jamie7687 (talk) 20:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep If there are sources about this person available on the internet, we should keep this one, unless the aforementioned sources have been taken down. David Osipov (talk) 07:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Remove everything private and keep, although I can see any private information here. Interestingly, the fact that Dr Younis was a comedian or a surgeon is information based in publicly available references but the fact that she no longer is a comedian or a surgeon is not. Pere prlpz (talk) 18:22, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per David Raayaan9911 (talk) 19:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q130262936

[edit]

Erik Laurentz Hogh Pihl (Q130262936): (1925-1998): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Only reference is his memorial service in a local newspaper. A search using the name or his alias doesn't give anything relevant. Dying doesn't make a person notable. Günther Frager (talk) 09:05, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep While English Wikipedia may only be for people that have achieved some sort of fame, Wikidata allows anyone that can be described by serious and public sources to have an entry, so long as they are not involved in self-promotion. A "local newspaper" is both serious and public, and dead people are not involved in self-promotion, because they are dead. There is also a structural need as a descendant of Sophus Pihl, who does have a biography in Wikipedia. See for example: w:Lincoln family where people can use our resources to educate themselves about family relationships. --RAN (talk) 16:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Just in the US more than 3,000,000 people die per year. There is no point in having every single person that die or all graduates from Harvard or all the descendants of Gengis Khan.None of them are notable just because they belong to one of these groups. Günther Frager (talk) 18:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • And Findagrave is able to manage 226 million human entries and 564,000 cemetery entries that I can search in a few seconds and find the one I am looking for. Wikidata:Notability: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." Is your argument that an obituary is not "serious" or not "publicly available"? Just because 3,000,000 die each year that doesn't mean that someone will take the time to create those entries. It would take 5.7 years to create 3,000,000 entries at one a minute, working 24 hours a day. Please stick to Wikidata rules on notability. The entry also has a Findagrave identifier which shows the person's grave marker that confirms the data in the entry. The entry also has a Familysearch identifier which links to 13 documents that confirm the data in the entry. The FamilySearch database has over 1 billion unique human entries, and again I was able to find the entry for Pihl in a few seconds. --RAN (talk) 19:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The necrology section of a newspaper is not journalism. The family or the funeral service writes it and pays for its publication. It is the same as someone that pays for a classified advertisement, or someone that writes a blog post about their deceased grandmother. I'm not arguing that we just include all of them before include this particular entry, I'm arguing that we should not add random entries of entities that have no relevance. It is the same as adding an entry about a random company just because it appears in https://annuaire-entreprises.data.gouv.fr/ or because they appeared in a public notice indexed by https://www.masspublicnotices.org/. Günther Frager (talk) 20:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    You mentioned "relevance", since you can't read people's minds or predict what people will be searching for in the future, how do you know what people find relevant? Wikidata does not care what type of "journalism" is involved, it just must be a "serious" and "publicly available" reference. It doesn't matter whether it was written by a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, or the funeral director, or the person's child. Even if it contains an error, we still use that fact and deprecate it. A public notice or a telephone directory would only give one or two data points. We have a dozen facts about this dead person. If you want to lobby for changing the Notability rules for Wikidata, the way to do that is at Village Pump, not deleting one entry that you do not like. You are also using the strawman argument about companies, this is not about companies. Companies are deleted if they are self promotion or paid promotion. Companies are also registered that may never exist, they are just shell companies. People actually exist and are referenced in "serious" and "publicly available" media. --RAN (talk) 21:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Please stop being rude claiming that I'm nominating something because "I don't like it". The example with companies is not strawman it is a "clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity". Now you are assuming that people are more "notable" than companies even though they are referenced in the same (or more if we consider the French government) "serious" and "publicly available" media. Günther Frager (talk) 22:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, you have completely demolished any argument for keeping all entries on every possible company. Yet, we are talking about an entry on a person, not a company, which is what makes it a strawman argument. --RAN (talk) 23:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't see the distinction between them in WD:N, could you quote the place where there is different treatment between people and companies in the policy? Günther Frager (talk) 00:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    A directory, whether of companies or of people is not information dense, it gives just two data points, not enough for a full entry. This entry up for deletion is information dense, not just a name and a telephone number. I think most people would agree that an entry for any human where we only have a name and telephone number or only a company name and a street address would be deleted. --RAN (talk) 04:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I asked for the policy, not for your opinions or conjetures. Günther Frager (talk) 06:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Wikidata is for collecting databases, this person has links to databases (which are not social media) so I'm inclined to think they pass WD notability.StarTrekker (talk) 21:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Wikidata is not Wikipedia. I'd support @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) and @StarTrekker arguments here David Osipov (talk) 07:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q129005532

[edit]

Mario Kleff: Without Fear (Q129005532): Biography of Mario Kleff, authored by Colin Roberts.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Self promotional items created by User:Designer Mario Kleff

[edit]
Batch 2
  1. Q129730298 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q129676896 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q129627806 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q129626995 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q129621950 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q129616741 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q129572070 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q129552644 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q129551858 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q129188115 (delete | history | links | logs)
  11. Q129180514 (delete | history | links | logs)
  12. Q129179398 (delete | history | links | logs)
  13. Q129177120 (delete | history | links | logs)
  14. Q129176858 (delete | history | links | logs)
  15. Q129176664 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)
  16. Q129176376 (delete | history | links | logs)
  17. Q129175899 (delete | history | links | logs)
  18. Q129175697 (delete | history | links | logs)

Dubiously notable architect. Created a huge number of items of dubiously notable builds and other personal projects (art writing etc). Related items Q129005532 Q130260444 nominated separately by another user. William Graham (talk) 23:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Q130238815 that was created by the same user prior to registration. William Graham (talk) 23:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q25583573

[edit]

Nematollah Akbar (Q25583573): Tajikistani journalist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam/promotional Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q19342429

[edit]

14th-century Sienese Painting, room 3 (Q19342429): exhibition hall in the Uffizi, Florence: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability, now unused, new organisation, now Q117113015 --Oursana (talk) 14:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
only because the kist is not updated--Oursana (talk) 20:03, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601678

[edit]

Elisheva Jakobovits (Q75601678): (born 1966): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. This goes for all those nominated below by the same person. --RAN (talk) 23:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC) --RAN (talk) 23:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Obviously this is a promotion, a bored kid created items on all his family members, none of the items are needed. אייל (talk) 06:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • @אייל: No. These are the descendents of en:Immanuel Jakobovits, Baron Jakobovits, former chief rabbi of the UK, admired by Margaret Thatcher, and made a peer in the House of Lords of the UK Government -- an extremely significant figure.
The items are not the creation of a "bored kid" importing "all his family members". The items were created as part of a systematic import of entries from The Peerage (Q21401824), populating property The Peerage person ID (P4638). The information here is in turn sourced to Burke's Peerage (Q1016410), a standard UK reference work, part of the reference collection in every UK main public library. The view was taken that because significant people in public life are so often connected to people listed in this book, it made sense to import the whole website, to make it possible to analyse that connectedness at scale.
As the stats at Property_talk:P4638#Progress indicate, all but about 500 items from that import are still in the system, so it has indeed tended to be kept by the community (and of the 500 items out of 700,000 that have disappeared from the total count, that is largely due to mergers, rather than deletions).
Therefore  Keep for all of them., unless there are specific reasons to delete any of these individuals.
(Note that, given their listing in Burke's Peerage, WD:LP is probably not at issue here, at least as regards existence, names, and family relationship). Jheald (talk) 18:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete for all of these items per Peter James since they all seem to referenced to a personal genealogical website and Wikidata isn't a personal database of someone's non-notable family members. I don't buy the idea that these items should be kept simply because they created as part of an import either. Imports don't get a special pass from the notability guidelines. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The items here are sourced to a personal website but a better source is cited there and that could probably be used. I agree some items from this import should be deleted, but not the items listed here. Peter James (talk) 00:13, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Further Jakobovits descendents

[edit]

The following should all probably be considered together, unless there are particular issues relevant to any particular single entry. Jheald (talk) 18:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] 

Q75601683

Isaac Aryeh Homburger (Q75601683): (born 1992): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601680

Pinchos Jacob Homburger (Q75601680): (born 1988): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601685

Avigail Esther Homburger (Q75601685): (born 1987): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601679

Meir Homburger (Q75601679): (born 1986): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601677

Sam Eli Homburger (Q75601677): Peerage person ID=237165: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601682

Yehoshua Homburger (Q75601682): (born 1990): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601664

Aviva Jakobovits (Q75601664): (born 1958): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601663

Joseph Samuel Adler (Q75601663): Peerage person ID=237156: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601667

Pierre Adler (Q75601667): (born 1979): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601668

Nathan Adler (Q75601668): (born 1980): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601672

Ann Adler (Q75601672): (born 1982): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601673

Tzippora Adler (Q75601673): (born 1983): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601675

Gila Adler (Q75601675): (born 1985): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601669

Abraham Adler (Q75601669): (born 1989): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601671

Tobi Adler (Q75601671): (born 1992): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601652

Jeanette Jakobovits (Q75601652): (born 1956): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601654

Norman David Turner (Q75601654): Peerage person ID=237149: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601656

Ezriel Turner (Q75601656): (born 1978): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601660

Hadassa Turner (Q75601660): (born 1979): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601657

Yehuda Turner (Q75601657): (born 1981): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601658

Elie Turner (Q75601658): (born 1983): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601661

Ayala Turner (Q75601661): (born 1987): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75632216

Raphael Turner (Q75632216): (born 1995): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601660

Hadassa Turner (Q75601660): (born 1979): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601662

Simcha Turner (Q75601662): (born 1994): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601640

Esther Jakobovits (Q75601640): (born 1953): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601641

Chaim Zundel Pearlman (Q75601641): Rabbi: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 9 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601643

Eliezer Pearlman (Q75601643): (born 1974): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601645

Ephraim Pearlman (Q75601645): (born 1978): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601646

Eliyohu Pearlman (Q75601646): (born 1982): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601651

Sarah Pearlman (Q75601651): (born 1988): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601642

Yehuda Pearlman (Q75601642): (born 1972): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601650

Adina Pearlman (Q75601650): (born 1980): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601647

Daniel Pearlman (Q75601647): (born 1985): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601648

Zipporah Pearlman (Q75601648): (born 1976): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601632

Samuel Jakobovits (Q75601632): (born 1951): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601636

Shraga Feitel Jakobovits (Q75601636): (born 1975): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601635

Yaacov Jakobovits (Q75601635): (born 1979): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601639

Yehudit Jakobovits (Q75601639): (born 1988): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601639

Yehudit Jakobovits (Q75601639): (born 1988): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601634

Ester Gitel Kahana (Q75601634): Peerage person ID=237133: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601638

Zipora Jakobovits (Q75601638): (born 1977): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601620

Julian Jakobovits (Q75601620): (born 1950): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601621

Michelle Tauber (Q75601621): Peerage person ID=237123: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 9 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601622

Nechemya Jakobovits (Q75601622): (born 1974): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601624

Nathan Jakobovits (Q75601624): (born 1977): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601625

Elie Jakobovits (Q75601625): (born 1982): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601631

Sima Jakobovits (Q75601631): (born 1988): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601629

Penina Jakobovits (Q75601629): (born 1979): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601630

Tzippora Jakobovits (Q75601630): (born 1981): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601626

Jeremy Jakobovits (Q75601626): (born 1985): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. This goes for all those nominated above by the same person. --RAN (talk) 23:20, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q75601623

David Jakobovits (Q75601623): (born 1975): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. This goes for all those nominated above by the same person. --RAN (talk) 19:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q116455411

[edit]

International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature (Q116455411): code of scientific nomenclature (plant communities): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of "International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature" Q64152139 --JSoos (talk) 19:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Edition and series are distinct. William Graham (talk) 20:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Editions are different because the problem described in the next section ("4th edition" vs "4th ed. Russian translation", see next section "Q116454942") Please look after the topic. There could be only one legal "Code" exist, no more! The latest was accepted by the 4th edition. It is like the "International Code of Zoological Nomenclature" Q13011. there is only one. The difference is that this is part of the botanical (algae, fungi, plants) code Q693148. JSoos (talk) 18:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q116454942

[edit]

International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 4th ed. (Russian translation) (Q116454942): Russian translation of the original English article, published on 5 december 2022: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of "International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 4th edition" Q116454846 --JSoos (talk) 19:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See previous section (Q116455411), if that is deleted, no link! JSoos (talk) 22:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Edition and series are distinct. William Graham (talk) 20:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, that is true, it is the Russian translation of the original. I tried to link it to Q116454846, but I am not sure I made it properly. Anyhow, 4th edition became vakid since 1 January 2021, so this Russian article should not be listed the same way as the 3rd and 4th editions. That is why element in previous sections has distinct edition list, JSoos (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q38240542

[edit]

Austin Pool (Q38240542): Canadian actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 21:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you consider user-generated content serious? --Dorades (talk) 22:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is Wikidata and Wikipedia and Wikisource and Wikiquote serious? They are all user-generated, yet Wikidata itself is used by the Library of Congress and the Virtual International Authority File people as an Identifier. User-generated is not a synonym for unreliable or not-serious. Wikipedia is user-generated and had fewer errors than Encyclopedia Britannica. --RAN (talk) 23:14, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, neither Wikidata nor any other Wikimedia project is "serious". That's why we remove references to Wikipedia if there are other references present. That Wikidata is used by other institutions that we consider serious is nice for us. We also link to user-generated content, e.g. social media accounts, which does not mean that this content is "serious".
On a side note: The investigation of error rates in Wikipedia vs. Britannica (got the link from your user page) says otherwise: "The result: 2.9 errors per article for Encyclopaedia Britannica versus 3.9 errors per article in Wikipedia.". --Dorades (talk) 17:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q38240324

[edit]

Jared Cook (Q38240324): American actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you consider user-generated content serious? --Dorades (talk) 22:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Or even bot-generated, in cases of Film.ru and Kinobox which are often take data from IMDb. These are online catalogues which just mention everyone who worked on a film. They do not normally imply notability. They are not enough. --Wolverène (talk) 06:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is Wikidata serious? It is user-generated and used by the Library of Congress and the Virtual International Authority File people. User-generated is not a synonym for unreliable or not-serious. Wikipedia is user-generated and had fewer errors than Encyclopedia Britannica. --RAN (talk) 23:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For my answer, please see above on the RfD for Q38240542. --Dorades (talk) 17:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Played a role in Billy Madison (Q372299), so notable by the criterion 3. We only need to connect the item from Q372299. --Wolverène (talk) 06:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have not watched this movie, but are roles like this ("Ernie (Grade 3)") enough for WD:N #3? His other two roles read similar. --Dorades (talk) 17:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have not either. There are no contradictions with the policy, especially if it was not a non-credited appearance (which may have a chance to be faked in the catalogues). The criteron 3 does not imply the estimation of a value number in properties, or an importance of values for the subject. Of course, I just would not like the mass creation of items about minor role performers but that is another story. --Wolverène (talk) 02:30, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are right, WD:N #3 does not weigh the importance of an item. But in my reading of this criterion, and I may be wrong in this, "structural need" means that the item linking to a item in question benefits from this link. Now I wonder: is it useful (and how?) to have the actor of "Ernie (Grade 3)" listed there? Is this link indeed "needed" and makes "statements made in other items more useful"? --Dorades (talk) 09:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:31, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q97477564

[edit]

Category:French horn players (Q97477564): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could be easily merged into Q7645843, but the Wikimedia Commons has the duplication: m:commons:Category:Horn players from France & m:commons:Category:French horn players. --Wolverène (talk) 04:08, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wolverène c:Category:French horn players is for people (from any country) who play the w:en:French horn. c:Category:Horn players from France is for people who are French and play a horn. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q110918424

[edit]

CSI universe (Q110918424): narrative universe of the CSI televesion shows and media franchise: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no "CSI universe." The franchise takes place in the United States and there's already Q264198 which this seems to be a duplicate of. So this item should be deleted as an unsourced, made up concept. Adamant1 (talk) 20:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q110940895

[edit]

NCIS universe (Q110940895): narrative universe of the NCIS television shows and media franchise: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no "NCIS universe." The franchise takes place in the United States and there's already Q17182743 which this seems to be a duplicate of. So this item should be deleted as an unsourced, made up concept. Adamant1 (talk) 20:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q64861227

[edit]

MacFarlane animated universe (Q64861227): fictional universe of the animated television show Family Guy, American Dad!, and the Cleveland Show: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Family Guy takes place in Quahog, Rhode Island and there is no "Family Guy universe" which is why this item is unreferenced. Plus the franchise is already being covered by Q55012102. So this item should be deleted as an unreferenced, made up concept. Adamant1 (talk) 21:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Family Guy, American Dad and The Cleveland Show all take place in the same shared universe. Maybe it shoulnd't be called the "Family Guy universe", but a shared universe between these franchises certainly exists.StarTrekker (talk) 18:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@StarTrekker: If there is a fictional universe here I'd say it's the "fictional universe of Quahog, Rhode Island as featured in cartoons created by Seth MacFarlane." Otherwise the whole thing is just circular and makes zero sense. Like what makes The Cleveland Show or American Dad take place in the "Family Guy universe" to begin with and not the other way around? For all we know the universe is "American Dad universe" and Family Guy actually takes place in it or they both take place in "The Cleveland Show universe." Or maybe their separate fictional universes that take place in the fictional universe of each other and it's all just fictional universe inception? --Adamant1 (talk) 20:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Adamant1: Unless given a unique name fictional universes are generally named after it's initial media, but as I said it probably doesn't need to be named the "Family Guy universe", maybe Seth McFarlene universe or something similar.StarTrekker (talk) 20:58, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@StarTrekker: At that point your just talking about the Family Guy franchise. Which again there's already Q55012102 for. Per Family Guy (franchise) "Family Guy is an American animated comedy franchise created by Seth MacFarlane and originally developed for Fox. Consisting of two television series: Family Guy (1999–present) and The Cleveland Show." I'd also include American Dad in that, but regardless your just coming up with random synonyms for the Family Guy franchise at this point. "Seth Macfarlane universe" wouldn't work anyway because it insinuates anything and everything created by him takes place in the same universe and he also wrote The Orville, which obviously doesn't take place in the fictional town of Quahog, Rhode Island as depicted in the Family Guy franchise. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, a franchise is not identical to a fictional universe. That's an idea that you're trying to push but I don't think the majority agree on.StarTrekker (talk) 21:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@StarTrekker: I don't see how I'm trying to push anything when I literally quoted Wikipedia and that's what it says. Regardless, if I look up "Family Guy universe" there's literally no results for it on Google Search. There are a few results for "Seth MacFarlane Universe" but both of them are from Fandom. So if anything your the one trying to push their opinion, at least in this case.
Regardless, I don't think I've said anywhere that "fictional universes" don't exist as a concept. All I've said is that there has to be evidence that there's a fictional universe separate from the franchise for specific media franchises and there clearly isn't any in this case. Otherwise be my guest and provide some evidence that there's a Seth MacFarlane or whatever "universe" separate from the Family Guy franchise. The last time I checked Fandom isn't a valid reference and that's all I could find though. "Universes exist so everything's a universe as long as I say it is!!" Right. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I posted a link above that already confirms that the shared universe exists for McFarlanes animated shows. And you don't need to keep going on about how the name isn't "Family Guy universe", I already talked about that. I'm not pushing any idea, it provably does exist.StarTrekker (talk) 10:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@StarTrekker: Yeah well, and to quote the article "The Cleveland Show is the first true spinoff of Family Guy. The creators have dropped hints that American Dad! and Family Guy exist in the same universe. But 'crossovers have been limited to the hypothetical scenario played out in the Stewie Kills Lois” episode. I don't think that proves anything. You have to admit that a hypothetical scenario in a single episode of a show is pretty spurious evidence. At that point you could justify creating a "fictional universe" item for just about anything. You clearly have zero standards though. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article is over 10 years old, there has been further crossovers since then.StarTrekker (talk) 15:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Clearly ten year old references are only valid when they support your argument. I'd ask for more recent ones but I'm sure you'd find an excuse to dismiss them to when it turns out they aren't any better. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:40, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You've been making nonsensical and uncivil claims this whole discussion. The article can not possibly mention something that had not happened yet, your claim that that shows that there isn't a universe does not hold, nor that I'm "dismissing" the source.StarTrekker (talk) 20:33, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article can not possibly mention something that had not happened yet Yeah sure, but then your the one who provided that source as evidence that there's a "fictional universe" for Family Guy. So....Anyway, I'm just asking for a source saying there's a fictional universe for Family Guy. That's it and I don't really see why you can't provide one if it's really a thing. Apparently it's nonsensical and uncivil to ask for sources though and you clearly aren't going to provide any. So I think I'm done here. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea what your problem is, the source does say that a shared universe exists, you have just decided that it's not good enough because it operated under the assumptions of it's time.StarTrekker (talk) 20:36, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Horcrux The problem is that whatever label we go with can't be made up and so far no one has proposed one that doesn't purely come from user generated websites. I guess the label could just be empty, but that kind of defeats the purpose of the whole thing. And BTW, just because "fictional universes" are a distinct concept that doesn't mean everything is a fictional universe or that it has anything to do with if that thing warrants an item on Wikidata. Otherwise your just making a totally baseless, circular argument for keeping the item. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:06, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Fictional Universe and Media Franchise are distinct concepts, the latter more to do with the business than where the fiction takes place. The Family Guy wikipedia article refers to the "Family Guy universe" but it's referred to as the "MacFarlane Universe" in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fictional_universes_in_animation_and_comics Piecesofuk (talk) 12:30, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q101199114

[edit]

South Park universe (Q101199114): fictional universe of the animated television series South Park: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no "South Park universe." Although the show takes place in the fictional town of fictional town of South Park, Colorado. But that's already covered by Q650733 and the South Park franchise as a whole is covered by Q54622175. So this item should be deleted as an unreferenced, made up duplicate of exiting items. Adamant1 (talk) 21:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q91628201

[edit]

Neon Genesis Evangelion universe (Q91628201): fictional universe of the anime television series and media franchise: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no "Neon Genesis Evangelion universe" and the media franchise in general is already covered by Q66834583. So this item should be deleted as a pointless duplicate of Q66834583. Adamant1 (talk) 21:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Do you have a reason to keep making seperate DRs if the reasoning is going to be an exact copy anyways? Otherwise it's kind of cluttering up the page--Trade (talk) 02:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Trade: I guess there's no technical reason they can't be combined. Except maybe that they have different links to the items for the franchises. But whatever. I just not sure how to create a bulk deletion request and there's no option for it in the "more options" drop down menu. I have no problem with you or anyone else combining them into a single request though. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions&action=edit&section=new&preload=Wikidata:Requests%20for%20deletions/Preload_2&editintro=Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Editintro_2&nosummary=1 Trade (talk) 03:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q55201066

[edit]

Got Funk (Q55201066): song by Kevin MacLeod: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merge with Q66661018 Prototyperspective (talk) 21:46, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why are you requesting a merge on Wikidata:Requests for deletions? Multichill (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q57521465

[edit]

New Friendly (Q57521465): song by Kevin MacLeod: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merge with Q66804652 Prototyperspective (talk) 21:47, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why are you requesting a merge on Wikidata:Requests for deletions? Multichill (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q111697679

[edit]

SMDOT/Contemporary Art (Q111697679): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy --Gmidun (talk) 14:30, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:41, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Required by Marco Cadioli (Q116472553) it seems. It looks like that would need to go for this one to go. ·addshore· talk to me! 20:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Zafer (talk) 10:55, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q130358048

[edit]

first cousin once removed (Q130358048): type of kinship: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It shall never be used. One of these two shall be used instead: "first cousin once removed ascending" (Q19901274) or "first cousin once removed descending" (Q19901611). --Svensson1 (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could first cousin once removed descending (Q19901611) and first cousin once removed ascending (Q19901274) be subclasses of Q130358048? Peter James (talk) 01:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, Q130358048 is wrong and shall never be used to anything. Svensson1 (talk) 14:34, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If a user writes "first cousin once removed" in the search box, six valid types of kinships are shown and the user can read more about each of them. They are "first cousin once removed ascending" and the sub types "second uncle" and "second aunt". And also "first cousin once removed descending" and the sub types "second nephew" and "second niece". To also show an invalid type of kinship in that search result list, that doesn't tell how one person is related to another, will not help anyone. It will result in a mess if we start adding invalid types of kinships in addition to all the very many valid ones. This invalid item, Q130358048, was created by misstake a few days ago. DeltaBot says the item is linked, but there are no links beside from a list that is periodically updated by a bot, so there is no reason to put this delete request on hold. Svensson1 (talk) 23:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q97070029

[edit]

Célestin Soucy (Q97070029): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lucie Paradis was boorn 2000 - its impossible to have grandchildren at this age Bahnmoeller (talk) 16:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lucie Paradis (Q97070031) was probably born in the 19th century, but a sitelink had been added which was an article about another person with the same name born in 2000. I removed everything that was added based on that link. I'm not sure of the notability of the family, but I would have to check the links between the items, and deletion of individual items would make this more difficult. If the information is correct they are related to at least one notable person Roch Voisine (Q1600132). genealogics.org person ID (P1819) says it does not imply notability, so I'm not sure how it was decided which should be imported. Peter James (talk) 15:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I went at least 15 items through the tree without finding a notable one, and without reaching Roch Voisine (Q1600132).
Starting at Roch Voisine (Q1600132) that is certainly notable, and I imagine mother and father should remain then, and likely the rest should be deleted? (At least that seems to be the general consnsus around family trees etc) ·addshore· talk to me! 21:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q1600132#P22 links to Q97070029 via Q97070006#P22, Q97070008#P25 and Q97070028#P22. Others in the same tree link to Jack Kerouac (Q160534) and Céline Dion (Q5105) via other families. I don't know if they should be deleted, but there are many more and the imports continue. Peter James (talk) 20:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130339596

[edit]

Paul Kekai Manansala (Q130339596): Author and blogger: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Clearly self-promotional, same name as main editor. Is it notable? -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 23:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:21, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Q130339596 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q130538697 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q130526815 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q130491476 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q130479894 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q130476238 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q130427691 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q130418991 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q130397648 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q130396641 (delete | history | links | logs)
  11. Q130396463 (delete | history | links | logs)
  12. Q130393859 (delete | history | links | logs)
  13. Q130393814 (delete | history | links | logs)
  14. Q130388104 (delete | history | links | logs)
  15. Q130387937 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB) -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 16:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They're all created by the same account, except for Paul Kekai Manansala (Q130339596) which wasn't registered. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 16:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The external identifiers suggest that he's notable, eg items with a Library of Congress identifier are usually kept https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n89298057.html Piecesofuk (talk) 18:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q94369459

[edit]

Răḣman Mustafai̐ev (Q94369459): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The same as Q30605051. --Yousiphh (talk) 16:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicate items are merged, not deleted. The nominated item appears to be a conflation of two separate individuals. Deletion of the item is not the solution, neither is the removal of sourced statements and external identifiers. The item was previously nominated for deletion and not done. Please see Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2024/10/09#Q94369459. — Dcflyer (talk) 01:40, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that there is two Rahman Mustfayevs - one is a historian and diplomat (the author of the book Azerbaĭdzhan mezhdu velikimi derzhavami (1918-1921)), and the second one is a writer-memoirist and police general (the author of the book Duz i̐ashadym, i̐ashadym...). The Library of Congress merged them together. In my opnion Q94369459 should merge to Q30605051 because both have the same year of birth and the same occupation. I already sent a letter to the Library of Congress about this misunderstanding. Yousiphh (talk) 13:22, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q96657596

[edit]

William Little Brown (Q96657596): Bank note “plate” printer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable. The person has a family member for whom a en.wiki entry exists, which was created by another distant extended family member. --Graywalls (talk) 17:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:41, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q2413616

[edit]

(R)-penam (Q2413616): chemical compound: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It makes no sense to have an item called (R)-penam, since (S)-penam by definition does not exist. I corrected the human-edited item Q82329450 to contain only data about Penam and not anymore about other substances, that are not to be namen Penam according to SciFinder. Kreuz Elf (talk) 14:00, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q2413616 was originally "Penam", I don't know why the label was changed. If they are the same they should be merged. Peter James (talk) 14:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q80579024

[edit]

Carl Zeiss jena camera lens (Q80579024): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 19:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently there's a lot of coverage about the Jena model of camera lens from Carl Zeiss, so...? DS (talk) 04:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That may be the case, right now this item seems to be modeled to represent the Commons category which would not be notable according to WD:N. --Dorades (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
AFAIK, "Jena" is not a model, it's part of the company name: Carl Zeiss Jena GmbH (Q13521884). So the Commons category should be renamed for proper capitalization. --2A02:810B:581:C300:551D:5078:3FD3:855 09:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q102217072

[edit]

Q102217072: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not existing object JAn Dudík (talk) 20:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is https://en.mapy.cz/zakladni?source=base&id=2286529&gallery=1&sourcep=foto&idp=3298798&x=14.3957198&y=48.9785816&z=19 from 2021, or is that somewhere else? Google street view from 2011, 2012, 2019 and 2023 shows what appears to be the base without a cross attached, so it could be a temporary structure on the same base. Peter James (talk) 13:12, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JAn Dudík Ping Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 11:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, some object exists here, so we can kepp it - but dont know how to remove RFD from item. MAybe I will find some sources in future... JAn Dudík (talk) 14:33, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JAn Dudík: If you want to withdraw the proposal, you can vote keep with {{Vk}} or state in bold that you want to withdraw it, so a sysop can close the RFD. Pere prlpz (talk) 21:17, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q106957769

[edit]

Jeh Cyrus Vandrevala (Q106957769): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only reference geni, where it is marked as private profile, no given name Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454 (talk) 04:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
this item and Cyrus Vandrevala (Q106957771) are notable by criteria 3 (spouse and son of Priya Niranjan Hiranandani (Q106957770)) - yona b (talk) 08:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no evidence provided that it is about a son of "Priya Niranjan Hiranandani" and that the person in Geni has the name stored in the label in Wikidata. Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454 (talk) 17:50, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note that "Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454" is now globally locked. Bovlb (talk) 05:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q106619290

[edit]

Kuok Meng Jun (Q106619290): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only reference geni, where it is marked as private profile, no given name Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454 (talk) 04:37, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75253495

[edit]

Isabella Tennant (Q75253495): born 1964; elder sister of model Stella Tennant: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

For personal reasons Isabella Tennant would like the names of her children and spouse removed from the entry --86.24.224.165 12:48, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If it is present on The Peerage website, it is impossible. I can't find it on source websites, but there is archived wersion, which clearly states this data: https://web.archive.org/web/20100719121735/http://www.thepeerage.com/p42972.htm#i429720 94.40.72.241 17:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131341947

[edit]

paternal niece (Q131341947): daughter of one's brother: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This seems a more specific concept than we really need, and the description doesn't seem to reflect the actual concept. Am I missing something? Bovlb (talk) 17:43, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By clicking on "edit" I managed to change the description and changed it to "daughter of a sibling of the father". Since when is a wrong description a reason for deletion? Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454 (talk) 17:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The new description is a cousin, not a niece. Bovlb (talk) 18:05, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bovlb These are terms used in Spanish, the opposite of maternal uncle or aunt (Q12446468) and paternal uncle or aunt (Q28017566). Madamebiblio (talk) 20:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So should it be "daughter of a brother"? That would make more sense than either of the offered descriptions. Bovlb (talk) 20:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The usage here is on relative (P1038) with the kinship to subject (P1039) qualifier as a more specific variant of niece (Q3403377). If we can decide what the meaning actually is, then I guess that makes sense, although I can't see a useful application of that sort of specificity. Why not just reify the sibling?
Since when is a wrong description a reason for deletion? Not being able to determine what underlying concept an item refers to is definitely a reason for deletion. Bovlb (talk) 20:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you not able? Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454 (talk) 00:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The original creator gave the description "daughter of one's sister", which sounds more like a maternal niece.
  • You changed the description to "daughter of a sibling of the father" which is a type of cousin.
  • Madamebiblio suggested "daughter of father's brother", which is a more specific type of cousin.
  • You later changed the description to "daughter of one's brother", which matches my guess of what the term might mean.
So there doesn't seem to be a clear consensus on what the team means, even according to you. And no-one has addressed my other point. Bovlb (talk) 18:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Both points in your first sentence of the request have been addressed. Rahul Varun Q113589827 (talk) 02:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
daughter of father's brother Madamebiblio (talk) 20:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So a cousin and (in most families) not a niece at all. I don't see any agreement here on what this term refers to. Bovlb (talk) 20:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
maternal niece (Q131923726): daughter of a sibling of the mother: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Here's another example. The description is "daughter of a sibling of the mother", which appears to describe a cousin. Bovlb (talk) 18:34, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The item had a clear original meaning - although it can be clarified or explained better. However, the reason given is "This seems a more specific concept than we really need" but it's a (maybe involuntarily) ethnocentric reason. Please see en:Kinship_terminology#Six_basic_patterns_of_kinship. In a lot of languages and cultures "daughter of one's father" daughter of one's father's brother is a different concept from "daughter of one's mother" daughter of one's mother's brother, although in English both are just female cousins (and "daughter of one's brother" and "daughter of one's sister" are also different concepts for what in English would just be "nieces"). Therefore, this item should be keep and cleaned as needed to clarify its meaning (and settle in one meaning) unless the same meaning already exists in other item and they could be merged.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:10, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Yes, @Bovlb:, it was a typo although it took a couple of months to me to notice it).--Pere prlpz (talk) 19:04, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps this was just a typo, but I reject the idea that either "daughter of one's father" or "daughter of one's mother" would be considered to be cousins (in most families).
I originally said that "This seems a more specific concept than we really need", and it seems that I need to clarify what I mean by that. This item appears to be intended for use as a qualifier value on relative (P1038)/kinship to subject (P1039), While is is useful to provide meaningful distinctions, there is literally no limit to the number of possible relationships that could be reified, both in distance from the subject and in qualities of the intermediate individuals. This means that we have to draw the line somewhere.
It was suggested above that this term is commonly used in Spanish (and perhaps elsewhere). That's certainly a consideration, but it is not determinative. We should not be reifying every phrase that is commonly used in some language or culture. Such linguistic or ethnocentric bias is not a useful ontological principle. In particular, we should be asking questions like: Will using this representation help us to answer useful questions that we could otherwise not answer? Will using this representation made it harder to write common queries correctly? To what extent is it possible to represent the meaning of this concept ontologically, distinguishing it from its peers?
Looking at the talk page for P1039, there is a long discussion of how specific the qualifiers should be, considering age- and gender-specificity. Interestingly the discussion there seems to favour concepts like maternal cousin (Q42301620) and paternal cousin (Q42301631). Indeed we currently have 9 sub-types of first cousin, and 5 sub-types of niece. This seems to favour retaining this term, but I note that the meaning of "paternal" in "paternal cousin" and "paternal niece" is very different, a point which is reflected in some of the confused definitions that have been offered. Bovlb (talk) 18:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that precise and well defined concepts should be used, and this one has room for improvement.
However, if we want to avoid ethnocentrism we should aim for the maximum possible granularity. Some cultures use the same word for children of one's brother and children of one's sister while other cultures have the same word for children of one's siblings and for one's own children. Saying that the former distinction is unimportant (so we don't need distinct elements "one's brothers child" and "one's sister's child") but we need different elements for niece and child (son/daughter) is an (undestandable and involuntary) ethnocentric bias. Pere prlpz (talk) 19:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm assuming that you mean the finest possible granularity here.
I don't think that's a reasonable goal, as there is no end to the potential qualification. The discussion I linked to supports the idea of coarser granularity. Personally I would be happy to merge "niece" and "nephew"; not all languages make that distinction, and there is a nascent effort to eliminate it in English (see niece or nephew (Q76477)). It's a cultural assumption that you need to verify everyone's gender just to describe a familial relation. Bovlb (talk) 19:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note that "Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454", whom I suspect may have been the original IP who created this item, has now been globally locked. Bovlb (talk) 05:14, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This item has gone through several mutually exclusive descriptions, and now seems to be a duplicate of fraternal niece (Q23045278). Should we merge? Or is its meaning hopelessly confused and we should delete? Bovlb (talk) 20:03, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q130736822

[edit]

Still Heroes (Q130736822): Interactive fiction by Exaheva: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable software/game/digital comic book. William Graham (talk) 16:09, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can it be merged with Still Heroes (Q111726552)? Piecesofuk (talk) 19:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q20088085

[edit]

dictionary page in Wikipedia (Q20088085): MediaWiki page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A) Wikipedia articles cannot be dictionary pages, otherwise they violate the w:en:Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a dictionary rule. b) Subclass wiki page (Q111279923) explicitly define "different from (P1889) = encyclopedia article (Q13433827)", that are not compatible with "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia" rule. Vladis13 (talk) 22:12, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Most instances of this are dictionary pages in the Haitian Creole Wikipedia. Peter James (talk) 10:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q68419912

[edit]

??? (Q68419912): 1959 journal article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 21:30, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:41, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably notable, but requires further research: The SIMBAD reference indicates the item is an article in a 1959 issue of Mitteilungen ueber Veraenderliche Sterne (Q106466689). Possibly the original title has been lost in translation or database maintenance, or the ADS record was corrupted. Someone who reads German and has access to a library holding the journal should be able to investigate and clarify the reference. And note there are similar enigmatic/incomplete bibliographic items such as ??? (Q68666745). -Animalparty (talk) 03:05, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

??? (Q68666745) has the same volume and page number as An objective-prism spectral survey of early-type stars in a region of Cassiopeia (Q68461151), and the articles linking to it have the description "star in the constellation Cassiopeia" or no description, so it's probably a duplicate and one of the years is wrong - other articles in volume 66 are said to have been published in 1989. I couldn't find anything that looked like a duplicate of ??? (Q68419912). Peter James (talk) 03:08, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q7456546

[edit]

Seth MacFarlane's Cavalcade of Cartoon Comedy, season 1 (Q7456546): season of television series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This webseries never had anything more than one "season". There is no need for this item. --StarTrekker (talk) 19:05, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, seems like there kinda was a first and second season, the first being released online, and the second released on home video.StarTrekker (talk) 20:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:41, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131448763

[edit]

J. Sam Williams (Q131448763): American pop artist with R&B: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

LTA-created item Chó Vàng Hài Hước (talk) 03:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete once the Wikipedia articles are deleted. This is identical with Joseph Williams (Q131137970) and an ongoing spam attempt by numerous sockpuppets (cf. Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Quotewiki223). --Dorades (talk) 16:31, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are now three Wikipedia links. Bovlb (talk) 16:05, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One left, TEWIKI, still with a deletion notice. Bovlb (talk) 18:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noting that the tewiki article has not been deleted yet. –FlyingAce✈hello 23:14, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q7722807

[edit]

The Chronicles of Amber (Q7722807): book by Roger Zelazny: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Conflation. Item was originally created for en:The Chronicles of Amber (omnibus), an overview article covering various omnibus and collected editions of the novel series. The article was later turned into a redirect, here's the last proper version. The item's currently modeled like an item for a single novel, with imported data only from the first infobox of the article. The identifiers are for different omnibus/anthology editions. Since each of these books/editions would need it's own separate item, and the redirect doesn't refer to a specific topic that would warrant an item, there's little use in remodeling or keeping this one. --2A02:810B:581:C300:893E:901B:2BAF:72BC 00:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130518954

[edit]

Lechitic culture (Q130518954): culture of Medieval Pomerania: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Orphaned, unnecessary and poorly defined item, no incoming links, no notability. Created by banned User:Kriestovo Nysian socks. Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk) 09:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's sitelinked to commons:Category:Lechitic culture - which has quite a bit of content. Seems notable? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The wikidata and commons entries are all created by the same accounts to 'prove' the notability of each other. They are nevertheless completely fringe and should be deleted in both wikidata and commons. I strongly support deletion as well. Cplakidas (talk) 16:37, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For reference on the extent of the disruption, see the sock investigation at Commons Cplakidas (talk) 16:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q60447364

[edit]

Always Hungry (Q60447364): musical artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is an interesting case. Duplicate of Q59600601, deleted this last year for lack of notability, but has existed since 2019 and has an in-link. I established that the two items represent the same entity because of the shared Instagram and Twitter handles, and also by examination of photos (check the neck tattoo). Either we should delete this, or undelete and merge. Bovlb (talk) 01:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fralambert Bovlb (talk) 01:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete together with YesBabyLisa (Q60445051) and Don't Be Shy (Q60447338). They are only linked to each other --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:02, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q124032127

[edit]

UCSD Tritons softball scrimmage, November 9, 2019 (Q124032127): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable as an event or a category Quesotiotyo (talk) 22:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It has a well-populated Commons category. Bovlb (talk) 00:16, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also used by most of the images of this category [3]. Probably not a good use of description, but it need to be deleted in the images first. Fralambert (talk) 23:35, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q68466327

[edit]

SCP (Q68466327): video game series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a video game series Trade (talk) 07:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Max Nester

[edit]
  1. Q120474865 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q120474462 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. The claim that NPT Label (Q120474462) is one of the record labels of Bizyulka (Q120474324) is supported by a reference in ru.wp, but the given spotify page in this reference does not name that record label. It is also implausible that a label that was founded in 2021 (like stated in the item) should have released an album from 2006. Dorades (talk) 19:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q131698950

[edit]

Jeff Radwell (Q131698950): American author, entrepreneur, and scientist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Recreation of Q130946534, but now with better identifiers and sourcing; see en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Radwell Bovlb (talk) 17:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bovlb (talk) 17:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding LocationIQ map styles

[edit]
  1. Q121746460 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q124748380 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q124746368 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q126113580 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q126113613 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q126113091 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q126113813 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q126113892 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 18:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DaxServer, WiK14ot0g, Ms040got:. --Dorades (talk) 19:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dorades, first you mixed up something in your request. Secondly, I understand your focus on deleting stuff you don't find notable or don't understand, but could you please ask/inform myself before you always do a RfD. Third, it is not nice if someone just deletes all your work before talking about it (and more important before I could grab a json of the work, especially often I don't know what you request if it's already deleted, because 12h are to less to react. And wikidata is community work. Without nice communication it's not great to support and improve the project. And I like learning and contributing to the project, but you make it disappointing.
Let us discuss and let me learn.
Thanks Ms040got (talk) 08:43, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I correct myself, because I did not know and I did not add the Indian people from 4.-8. , but why would you delete the companies? There are so many companies inside wikidata.
So where is the level of notability in them? Maybe the level of notability has to adapt to that de facto fact of that? Is there a discussion about it somewhere? Ms040got (talk) 08:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ms040got, thank you for your message. I understand that it can be discouraging to invest time and work in something which gets deleted afterwards, especially when you have the feeling of being left out of a discussion.
I think it is important to distinguish two things here:
  1. the specific items in question,
  2. the deletion process in general.
For the second aspect, the right venue would be WD:PC (like I already said last year). I personally can't change this process and I assume that not many people will read this here. I can also not affect how fast requests here are handled. Since this is the page for deletion requests I think this is the right venue to discuss whether specific items are notable or not or should be deleted for another reason. I don't think it is useful to spread these discussions to user talk pages. To inform you about this discussion I pinged you. All items should comply with WD:N and the people who create the respective items are responsible to demonstrate the notability in the items themselves.
The items in this deletion requests are linking to each other, this is why I nominated them here together. Apart from that, I don't see anything that makes any of these items notable according to our notability criteria. Of course I can be wrong or it turns out that these items are notable, but it's not demonstrated yet. If you think any or all of them are indeed notable, you can present your arguments here. Regards, --Dorades (talk) 23:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I understand the thing with WD:N, but why are you so active in RfD with not having knowledge about the items you request?
Is the "notability not depending of the knowledge of the user? Is that not better to ask the person to correct the items instead of deleting. I mean In OpenStreetMap, you give a hint whats wrong and not delete the item.
First there was wikipedia, than wikidata started. Sure there are not always wikipedia articles for that in the beginning, but I guess there are millions of wikidata entities without wikipedia pages. So how you define "your" notability reasons for RfD?
In my consens, it is notable, because the field of work of the businesses and people is like Mapbox (Q17068357) or Google Maps (Q12013)
They play an important role for switch2OSM (Q122189289) as a contribution to OpenSource, like Wikimedia activities also do.
I understand that wikidata has their goals, but geolocation is part of that. Ms040got (talk) 08:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Which knowledge on my side do you miss? I see LocationIQ map styles (Q121746460) which is a "collection of osm map styles" according to its description (series of creative works (Q7725310) is probably the wrong item to use as instance of (P31) btw as it is applicable only to creative works) which is linked to the respective companies by using authority (P797) which is also not applicable here. The companies are linked to their directors/founders/CEOs and these are linked to more companies and these again to their directors/founders/CEOs.
What is important here is that none of these items meet any of the criteria described on WD:N on its own. You are right that most of the Wikidata items do not have a sitelink, but ideally they fulfill WD:N #2 or #3 then. I don't see this demonstrated for the items in question. Now it might be the case that these items are notable, then please add relevant statements/links/references to the items. It's not about my personal idea of notability but about the criteria accepted by the Wikidata community. Contrary, the notability of items must be apparent for everyone and items should be modeled in a manner that anyone can understand what the entity is about and what it describes.
Please also note that not every entity (be it companies, be it people, be it abstract concepts) is notable for Wikidata. We also don't model every detail about Wikidata or Wikipedia. Even if Wikimedians should have their own items is controversial. --Dorades (talk) 21:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
but maps and all cartographic work is creative work, so also map styles in every derivative version.
a question because of „authority“ because I added it. Is that wrong and how to improve the entry? Thanks. WiK14ot0g (talk) 09:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, I don't think so, since. If it is indeed a series, I'd use sequence (Q20937557). Not that series is characterised by being an "ordered set". Maybe group (Q16887380) or collection (Q2668072) is more applicable here?
As for authority (P797): I don't know exactly what you are trying to model here, but I think owned by (P127) could be used. If you just want to say that LocationIQ map styles (Q121746460) is product of LocationIQ (Q124746368), it's enough to have it modeled there.
I'd like to note though that all of this doesn't contribute to demonstrate the notability of these items. --Dorades (talk) 15:45, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for the answers. I read WD-N again, what does the 2nd criteria ("
It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references.")
exactly mean?
I always refer to another instance which is valid or identify it as an material entity. And if there are public sources (websites, scientific papers, lexixa) it should be fine? Ms040got (talk) 20:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The key point in this sentence is that these references must be "serious". Scientific papers or entries in encyclopedias are for sure serious in this meaning. For websites, it depends; if it is a website by e.g. a state government or major media, it can be considered serious and reliable, too. Not so much if that website is controlled by the entity itself or a social media profiles or other self-published resources. Also state registers of companies, where every company is listed, are not considered serious (cf. Wikidata:What Wikidata is not: "White or Yellow Pages"). --Dorades (talk) 07:45, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q126394863

[edit]

clicker game (Q126394863): subtype of incremental games that focus on rapid and repetitive clicking to earn resources, with upgrades to automate and enhance the clicking process: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable on its own. Same as incremental game (Q18351283) --Kim Kelting (talk) 00:29, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:31, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The genres are different, as evidenced by both reliable sources and many user sources explicitly pointing out the difference between the terms. We've discussed this extensively on my talk page, but the nominator continues to be stubborn, ignoring most of the arguments, insisting that since they are sometimes listed via ‘also known as’ there is no difference. But I've added scholarly articles that explicitly state that one is a sub-genre of the other. Solidest (talk) 07:11, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q106642728

[edit]

S. TIMOSHENKO, 69, CHURCH ARCHITECT; Exiled Ukrainian Leader Dies --Had Designed Edifices for Greek Orthodox Faith (Q106642728): obituary of Sergius Timoshenko in the New York Times: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No structural need (entirety of item can be represented in the references at Q9335552) Quesotiotyo (talk) 01:45, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:51, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would vote to  Keep but I'd be interested to know the official policy on these obituaries. When I've come across them they're usually instance of (P31) scholarly article (Q13442814) and I would add instance of (P31) obituary (Q309481) and I would link to them using stated in (P248)
But re the above item, running a SPARQL query for obituary (Q309481) in The New York Times (Q9684) there seems to be over 20000 of them see https://w.wiki/Ck9V would they all be deleted? Piecesofuk (talk) 18:30, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q131139947

[edit]

Love between animal conspecifics (Q131139947): type of affection between animals of the same kind: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item was created by user:Prototyperspective as an excuse to make File:DALL·E 2023-04-24 21.48.18 - two pigs, hearts, valentine's day.png in use, after the file was listed for deletion on Commons. Fails Wikidata:Notability. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:07, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't made as an "excuse" for anything. This is an incredibly notable major concept and that is why I made the Wikidata item. I may create a Wikipedia article about it at a later point once I have some time for that. It's clearly notable and I wonder why you can't see that. Also some sources about it are included in the item. Also see w:WP:AGF. Prototyperspective (talk) 21:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The academic publications provided are clearly "serious and publicly available references" in the sense of WD:N #2. (I also just added another one myself as reference for the statement that this is different from Q2431958.) As for "excuse", that accusation could equally be leveled against the act of nominating a Wikidata item for deletion with the motivation of "winning" a deletion discussion on Commons. But in any case this should be decided on the merits (i.e. applicable Wikidata content policies) rather than based on speculations about editors' motivations. Regards, HaeB (talk) 13:52, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Which academic publications are you referring to? I see 2 sciencedirect links provided but neither uses the word "love". whym (talk) 12:11, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  1. If that is the wrong term one could edit the label, it's about the concept and I think this term is the most fitting one in the language repertoire and evolutionarily linked to human love (one could also name it "deeply affective feelings that are evolutionary antecedents of human love in animals for conspecifics" but what's the rationale for that except maybe your gut feeling that this would somehow be better?
  2. Here are some studies that use that term one two three.
  3. That a Wikidata item exists does not mean the subject necessarily exists, it could also be a 'subject of research' or a disputed (qualifier) instance of: xyz.
Prototyperspective (talk) 16:53, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you are not being strict with the term/conccept "love", how do you decide when to use this and when to use Affection to conspecifics in animals (Q131139934)? whym (talk) 11:42, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In equivalent ways to how human affection is distinguished from human love. Friendships are usually more considered affection, see the WP article As a less sexual and more emotionally intimate form of romantic attachment, love is commonly contrasted with lust. As an interpersonal relationship with romantic overtones, love is sometimes contrasted with friendship, although the word love is often applied to close friendships or platonic love. There may be no super clear cut line, in part because the definitions vary or are blurry. Love encompasses a range of strong and positive emotional and mental states, from the most sublime virtue or good habit, or the deepest interpersonal affection, to the simplest pleasure. An example of this range of meanings is that the love of a mother differs from the love of a spouse […] (and I don't know if exclusively "states" is the right phrasing here) – here the love of animal parents to offspring differs from romantic animal couples etc for animals where these things exist. Prototyperspective (talk) 13:22, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Whym: Sorry, I didn't see your question until now. As mentioned, I was also referring to [4] (Blumenthal and Young, "The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives"), which I had added as a reference for the "different from Q2431958" statement. I have now also added it as an additional value under "described at URL" in case there are remaining concerns about the validity of the other publications listed there. Regards, HaeB (talk) 18:18, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What is the use case? Are there papers described on Wikidata to be tagged with this (and not love (Q316))? whym (talk) 12:12, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just to understand the relevance of this question: Am I correct to assume that you are asking because that would consist an additional "keep" argument under WD:N #3, separate/additional to the discussion regarding WD:N #2 above? Regards, HaeB (talk) 18:18, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe. But I don't think the two are completely separate. If external organizations have this in a classification system they might have (academic societies often have their own controlled vocabulary for papers), that would be a good signal - it will prove that the concept is stably defined outside of Wikidata, and we can just borrow it. In general, I think tagging can be done in a composite way on Wikidata, as I alluded above, using a more generic entity like love (Q316), and some qualifiers to describe something like "of animal", so I don't know if the need for tagging alone is enough to justify an entity, but I guess justification could come from the two aspects additively. whym (talk) 06:03, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:01, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q131318709

[edit]

Danbert Nobacon and The Bad Things (Q131318709): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not much information available, besides Spotify id, they are verified, but only 6 listeners per month. Not sure what makes this band notable. Mbch331 (talk) 12:39, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a project by Nigel "Danbert Nobacon" Hunter (formerly of Chumbawamba). Does that make a difference, I couldn't say. DS (talk) 15:25, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:21, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q121354166

[edit]

Digital Marketing Tools in the Conditions of Transformation of Communications of the Modern Organization (Q121354166): scientific article published in 2020: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unclear notability as the DOI doesn't resolve. Dorades (talk) 20:25, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It's a real verifiable article in Scientific Journal of Yuriy Fedkovich Chernivtsi National University. Economics (Q131820349). As you know, linkrot and unresolved DOIs are issues unrelated to notability. The article starts on page 32. It's in Ukrainian with an English summary at the end. -Animalparty (talk) 21:47, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q131814713

[edit]

Tree 1 (Q131814713): Tree in Park Merwestein, Dordrecht: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A non-notable individual tree Multichill (talk) 20:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep If you'd taken a few more seconds to look at this item you would've seen it commemorates the founder of the foundation behind this park. Spughetti (talk) 14:40, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How does that make the tree notable? Multichill (talk) 17:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's a memorial. Spughetti (talk) 17:32, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q131611851

[edit]

Tree 23 (Q131611851): Tree in Park Merwestein, Dordrecht: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A non-notable individual tree Multichill (talk) 20:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Trees in parks are notable, adding each tree in the Merwestein Park to Wikidata preserves the history of this park's nature. Spughetti (talk) 14:38, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How does that make the tree notable? This item might help the park, but doesn't help Wikidata at all. Multichill (talk) 17:23, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q99312

[edit]

Claudia Udenta (Q99312): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Verletzung Persönlichkeitsrechte, right to be forgotten Conny (talk) 20:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking reverted. Users warned.
Previous discussions: Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2025/01/05#Q99312, Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2025/01/20#Q99312
Bovlb (talk) 20:13, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have given OP a 1 week partial block from this item for blanking again after warning. There's no previous discussion in the two prior requests about removing any information from this item. If some information needs to be excluded, we can discuss that here. Bovlb (talk) 20:28, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relevant discussions:
Bovlb (talk) 21:12, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bovlb: I just reverted edits by an IP on the item. Samoasambia ✎ 00:21, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I was afraid that might happen. I've applied a week of semi-protection. Bovlb (talk) 00:29, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I reviewed the sources on the (deleted) ENWIKI article. Most of the references are now dead links. This interview is very thin. There's some bibliography/filmography, but all red-link or no-link. I can provide more details if required.
From some of the previous discussions, it seems that there's a long history of (someone claiming to be) the subject seeking deletion of articles about them. They don't seem highly notable, but they do have many identifiers. I'm sympathetic to the privacy concerns, but recreation here at Wikidata seems likely while they remain in the other databases. Bovlb (talk) 00:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't look like the OP has any interest either in explaining why this item should be deleted (specifically what has changed since the last two keeps), or what specific claims should be excluded. Shall we close this as "keep"? If so, we should probably apply some longer semi-protection given the history here. Bovlb (talk) 17:08, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The information given is mainly incorrect, based on false sources and subjective suggestions. The person of this data entry has not given permission to publish any information relating. There have been several deletion requests this year already for a reason. Please delete this data entry completely as it violates the person's privacy rights and the right to be forgotten. Please respect the rules of the GDPR, LED, and EUDPR. The Wikimedia office in Berlin was informed about it as well. You can verify with them. This entry does not relate to a relevant person. One DNB entry does not create relevance. Thanks. 2A01:599:141:3EE:9C57:3767:1E54:3568 22:53, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just out of curiosity: How is this page and entry valuable, when "Most of the references are now dead links." (as per your statement on 24 Jan 2025).
What is the use to be transmitting a name (even falsely) into 20 languages. Who is interested in knowing the name of this person in Arabic, Egptian Arabic, Bavarian, Asturian, Welsh, Divehi, Irish, Papiemento or Albanic?
The contents are based on non-existing sources. Without sources, there is no content allowed. This was cleaned up for a reason that does not need to be spread publicly.
You put "protecting" or "archiving" given data before actually seeing the issue at hand.
This Wikidata was derived from Wikipedia which was deleted, because it was violating the given data protection laws.
All details about occupations: director, translator, writer, publisher, etc are false.
And how was the citizenship information produced? Did you see the passport? Is Wikidata a governmental entity now?
Please delete this content. It is illegal and an infringement on personal and privacy rights. You may contact your SV at oversight-de-wp@wikimedia.org to get the confirmation about deleting this data entry. Thanks for understanding. Please delete this entry. 80.187.87.211 23:32, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This comment appears to be a response to me, and it reflects a confusion about the role I am playing here. I am not taking a position either way, but acting in an administrative and fact-finding capacity. In my responses above, I have attempt to dig up all relevant evidence related to this item, regardless of whether it suggests we should keep or delete it. My suggestion that we might have to close it as "keep" was based on the fact that we have already reached that conclusion twice, and no new arguments had been offered. We're happy to entertain a third discussion, but you should concentrate on actually making new arguments, not on attacking people who are trying to help you. Bovlb (talk) 00:51, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Bovlb.
(1) As per regulations, users are allowed to edit without registering an account.
However, I noticed that anonymous editing is (often) blocked despite this rule of equal access.
Source: [5]https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Policy:Privacy_policy#surveys-feedback
(2) You stated earlier that you just wanted to help. This is much appreciated.
However, when false data are published over and over again, it is not helping at all.
There is a reason why all Wikipedia articles were removed.
Wikidata needs to be removed as well.
(3) The person is NOT a director.
A director has done at least one movie for cinema or TV. This is not the case.
The alleged IMDb credit for ZDS (which was a Web-Soap with 3.5 minutes short episodes for manual individual download by MP4 or AVI files) was entered anonymously decades ago and has never been verified.
The true/correct director title goes to Ute Hilgefort (cf. proof: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zwischen_den_Stunden).
Please remove the director title from this Wikidata entry.
(4) What is the proof for this person having a Germany citizenship?
Why is this listed without any verification?
(5) Why is the name listed in 20 languages? What is the purpose of translation for a name without public relevance?
Most translations are carrying false information, such as "Turkish author":
Papiamento
Akdemir Udenta
outor turko
(6) Again, please delete this entry and all connected red list listings. This person is not a public person.
Having this profile published is a violation of personal rights.
It is illegal to spread false information about a person.
Maintaining this profile and data set is a violation of human rights. This is a person, a living being, not a plain data set.
Why is the Wikidata community not sensitive to protection of privacy?
Please delete this entry and make sure that bots are not publishing these data over and over again.
(7) Please also remove these incorrect entries:
A
Thanks. 2A01:599:640:8212:A03F:BC2F:243C:BA30 14:25, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
2
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Frankfurter_Buchmesse_2017/Deutschsprachige_Autoren/1965
3
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_writers/Redlinks_from_Wikidata
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red) 2A01:599:640:8212:A03F:BC2F:243C:BA30 14:26, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The identifiers link to the sources. Some have been removed but there are still the Library of Congress and the French and German libraries. GND ID (P227) and Library of Congress authority ID (P244) say they suggest notability but are not expected to be complete; IdRef ID (P269) does not specify but is probably the same. I think that means it's unnecessary to have all records from them, just those that are likely to be useful, and this item in Wikidata is not being used anywhere. Peter James (talk) 19:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

please delete: The entry on Claudia Udenta should be deleted from Wikidata due to legal and ethical concerns regarding personal data protection. Under the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation, Article 17) and the EUDPR (European Union Data Protection Regulation), individuals have the right to request the removal of personal information that is no longer relevant or necessary for public interest. Keeping an entry with unverified or outdated data violates the principle of data minimization, which is a key requirement in European data protection laws. Additionally, the Law Enforcement Directive (LED) emphasizes the need to protect individuals from unauthorized or unnecessary data exposure, particularly when no legal or journalistic justification exists. Given that Wikipedia has already deleted the corresponding article due to a lack of notability, maintaining the entry in Wikidata contradicts established deletion decisions and could expose Wikimedia to legal challenges under European privacy regulations.

The DNB entry alone does not establish lasting notability, as it primarily serves as a cataloging tool rather than a definitive measure of public relevance. Conny (talk) 17:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]

 Delete I see no reason to doubt that the person requesting its deletion acts in the interest of the person this item represents and I see no need to keep this item against the will of this person - it is currently not used in Wikidata at all. A GND entry may suggest notability, but it does not make an item obligatory. - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 12:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I second the two previous writers. Even before the final deletion, we should remove citizenship and gender from the item immediately (as well as all identifiers leading nowhere, like FID performing arts ID (P10608)) because they are unsourced while being disputed. --Rießler (talk) 16:51, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bobvlb, given that this deletion request is open over a month, with three voting delete, one comment I'd read as supporting deletion and no opposes, do you think that this item may be deleted? I'm not sure what else to do about it. Thanks a lot, - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 18:03, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Valentina.Anitnelav Seems to be a clear-cut case for WD:N #2 notability per external identifiers. I don’t really see any privacy concerns with the two remaining statements. --Emu (talk) 19:22, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Emu The two remaining statements (i.e.human and 20th century) are not creating any notability.
Furthermore, there are still confusions and mixing of two nameswith inconsistent sources. This data entry was created decades ago with no real proof for any of it. 80.187.84.246 12:57, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Statements don’t create notability. I understand that this matter is close to your heart but there seems to be no conceivable reason why this item could infringe on legitimate privacy concerns in any way. --Emu (talk) 13:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wikidata is supposed to be of value with listed items or persons. Just listing names without any real references or liable sources is like preserving any given name of any given person on this planet, hence diluting the reason why wikidata is actually existing. 2A01:599:142:7257:9881:EFB5:89C8:D599 13:12, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Emu, @Bovlb, @Valentina.Anitnelav
Inconsistencies are as follows:
(1) How does the first name "Claudia" translate to "Akdemir" in Asturian/Welsh/Irish/Italian/Paiamento/Polish/Slovenbian/Albanian, while it stays as "Claudia" in the remaining languages?
(2) Most Identifiers and their references are not existing, for example, the Freebase ID.
(3) IdRef ID is an outdated VIAF file from 2018, plus, the record has been deleted.
Also, merely being a film crew member does not create any special value in terms of notability. 80.187.84.246 13:06, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
1) Fixed.
2) I deleted the ISNI. The Freebase entry does exist.
3) Why would an outdated link in another database be relevant in this case?
GND, LCCN, IdRef ID indicate notability per WD:N #2. --Emu (talk) 13:15, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WD:N #2 says "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references." It does not say "There exists at least one external identifier". So, using only GND, LCAuth, IdRef please provide a (meaningful) description of this person. "Film crew member" is obviously not a meaningful description (what did the person do, exactly?), "human born in the 20th century" is not, either, as is a list of ids. What other value does this item provide in your opinion, apart from having a list of ids attached to it?
GND and LCAuth are identifiers that suggest notability (they indicate that an item is probably notable, see Wikidata property for an identifier that suggests notability (Q62589316)) but they do not make an item obligatory. I see no project claiming interest in or responsibility for this item (and taking care that no personal information is added) and this item is not used to describe any other item in Wikidata. It is currently useless, can be easily recreated if a project should need it in the future and the person this item represents disagrees with its existence.
I understand the appeal to WD:N #2 in cases where it belongs into the scope of a (Wiki)project but there is currently nobody to whom this item is interesting enough that they would improve it. So in this case the appeal seems to me rather weak. - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 12:54, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t share your intuition that the item in its current state is devoid of any meaning. Stating that certain external identifiers refer to the same person is a value in and of itself. You might not find the information useful but that doesn’t mean that there isn’t a use case for it.
On a more general note re do not make an item obligatory: Well yeah, no item on Wikidata is obligatory. That doesn’t mean that an item isn’t notable. --Emu (talk) 18:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So, let's not speak about an item being obligatory but about having a good reason to keep an item even if the person it represents disagrees with its existence.
Appealing to WD:N #2 because there are external identifiers may be reasonable in many cases, e.g. if the item is about a village garden or about a long deceased woman who was burned as a witch.
But if the item is about a living person who disagrees with its inclusion I'd expect a bit more: why can't we just fullfil this person's demand? What do we need this item for? Stating that certain external identifiers refer to the same person may be a value "in and of itself" to you (not my opinion), but so is self-determination. And in this particular instance the latter's weigh is higher, in my opinion. - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 13:05, 26 April 2025
Privacy concerns are of course important. However, as I have said, there seems to be no conceivable reason why this item could infringe on legitimate privacy concerns in any way. --Emu (talk) 16:54, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Bluerasberry (talk) 20:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC) HappyBear5000 Tjg6ph manspacetar Daniel Mietchen (talk) 19:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC) BeLucky Jura Marsupium Skim (talk) 07:19, 6 November 2018 (UTC) Satpal Dandiwal (talk) 05:31, 22 July 2019 (UTC) --Epìdosis 14:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC) Soufiyouns[reply]
Notified participants of WikiProject Biography: What do you think about this (just to get more opinions). - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 13:43, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding José Rafael Cordero Sánchez

[edit]
  1. Q107341677 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q19756574 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q104450790 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q104450820 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q108294362 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q110113397 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Fail WP:N, not relevant and not linked to any projects outside Wikidata. The items were created and are related to the cross-wiki LTA José Rafael Cordero Sánchez, who has persistently created autopromotional articles for almost 14 years now (nl:Wikipedia:Checklijst langdurig structureel vandalisme/Josercs1).
See also the previous discussions Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2019/10/11#Q56653802 and User talk:LadyInGrey#Pedido. NoonIcarus (talk) 12:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Roxana Chacón (Q19756574) and Pollito Tropical (Q107341677) were repurposed, now reverted, but the original entities did not establish strong notability. Bovlb (talk) 18:15, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q118732565

[edit]

Gold (Q118732565): 16th upcoming open movie by the Blender Animation Studio: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I created this item for an announced short film by the Blender Studio. New information from the Blender Studio is that the project is cancelled. This item is thereby no longer usefull --D-Kuru (talk) 10:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"No longer useful" - we list projects that were announced but then cancelled, yes? DS (talk) 19:50, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
First time in two decades they cancelled a project. It's easier to collect content on commons if you can include an item right away. But don't worry, next time I'll blank it and just say I created this by accident. --D-Kuru (talk) 09:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also to delete (redirect): Gold (Q123046403) --D-Kuru (talk) 19:08, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Is there anything I need to do here for this item to be deleted? --D-Kuru (talk) 05:20, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@D-Kuru: probably don't suggest you plan to lie to the admins in the future. why do you want it deleted? we generally keep even canceled projects. BrokenSegue (talk) 08:46, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"probably don't suggest you plan to lie to the admins in the future": How do I have to understand that now? Where do you think I have lied?
It is a problem that is cancelled and is not worth keeping as there is no major outcome like an open source movie (as there was for every other project before).
If we keep canceled projects, we can nuke this page as there is not a single reason to delete any item. Even an item only created for self promotion can be kept with P31 "unimportant person" D-Kuru (talk) 12:23, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, notable per WD:N criterion 2. Wikidata has no usefulness criteria, information for any notable subject may be useful one way or another. --Wolverène (talk) 12:05, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Freifunk Bodensee

[edit]
  1. Q66089535 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q64008116 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q64008049 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:22, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Along with see-base (Q63729340). --Dorades (talk) 16:39, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q131904651

[edit]

Open Government Data License - Bangladesh (Q131904651): OGD Bangladesh: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty. doesn't meet WD:N. Borhan (talk) 07:19, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Q131904751, another one with same reason. Borhan (talk) 07:24, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Template:OGDL-Bangladesh (Q131904751) has a Commons sitelink; Q131904622 has none, and both link to Open Government Data License - Bangladesh (Q131904651). Wikidata:Notability contradicts itself on templates with one sitelink: "item must contain at least two such sitelinks", "Items for non-subpages can be created with only one sitelink, but shouldn't be created in great numbers". Peter James (talk) 14:18, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Dj 4Rain

[edit]
  1. Q38260664 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q42294829 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q42295010 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q98060320 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q98060556 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q100160439 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q100160794 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q102111953 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q104831576 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q110476415 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Does not meet WD:N? Nutshinou (talk) 16:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q130772344

[edit]

Diesel Medina (Q130772344): Colombian Actor, Producer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability. fake data on imdb. --47.38.138.157 05:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:01, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Mahathir Mohamad in ... commons categories

[edit]
  1. Q131938984 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q131939098 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q131939157 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q131939039 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q131977875 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q131977574 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q131977289 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q131938928 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

These items for categories @commons with photographs of Mahathir Mohamad (Q181383) in various countries are not notable. Lymantria (talk) 06:29, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q66480449

[edit]

Wikimedia surname disambiguation page (Q66480449): type of Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Old RFD (Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2020/01/21#Wikimedia_disambiguation_page_subclasses) ended due to "withdrawn". For me this surname disambiguation page seems to be existing because of solo project of svwiki sv:Kategori:Efternamnsförgreningssidor. Surnames are different from DAB stuff and shouldn't be messed with each other Estopedist1 (talk) 08:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also courtesy ping for the creator: user:Moebeus--Estopedist1 (talk) 08:02, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the courtesy and won't be protesting your request:) Moebeus (talk) 12:38, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I like having separate items that are (in most cases) conceptually distinct but I also see the disadvantages. I'd still slightly vote for keep. And what about Wikimedia human name disambiguation page (Q22808320)? As MisterSynergy wrote at the preceding RFD, "Whatever we do to Q22808320 should be done to those ones as well." (i.e. to Wikimedia surname disambiguation page (Q66480449) and municipality name disambiguation page (Q61996773)). Adam78 (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Items created by User:Ezzex

[edit]
  1. Q131938096 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q131938231 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q131938275 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q131938321 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q131938796 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q131939051 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q131939118 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q131939351 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q131939783 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q131987590 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Adding "animated" in front of an already existing television genre item does not make a new genre. These items should either be deleted or merged with the TV genres they are based on Trade (talk) 23:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced animated action, animated fantasy, animated comedy etc. with comedy, action, fantasy etc. So you can delete. Ezzex (talk) 14:50, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete (or merge). These were not created to improve the quality of data on television series items, instead they were made to force infoboxes on the Norwegian Wikipedia to display information differently. They have also replaced the existing genres, and not in a 1:1 fashion; valid genres are now lost across potentially dozens of items so merging the genres won't completely fix them. —Xezbeth (talk) 04:48, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

is it okay with you if we keep Q77253697 Trade (talk) 06:23, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Trade@Xezbeth On English wikipedia we have following categories:
Category:Animated action television series
Category:Animated adventure television series
Category:Animated fantasy television series
Category:Animated comedy television series
Category:Animated crime television series
Category:Animated drama television series
Category:Animated horror television series
Category:Animated musical television series
Category:Animated romance television series
Category:Animated science fiction television series
Category:Children's animated television series by genre
Category:Adult animated television series by genre
... + more
I suggest som kind of redirects to an article (or a chapter of an article) on English wikipedia. Ezzex (talk) 12:41, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aimation is in my opinion way to special to just label them as actionseries, fantasyseries, comedy series, musicals etc. This is also one of the reasons why movieprodusers specifically calls some of their movies (often superhero-movies) "Live-Action movies". The producers wish to inform the audience that this is not an animation - event if it's based on animation or comics.--Ezzex (talk) 12:26, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete or merge. It's unnecessary detailing with the overlap between different types of shows and genres. Comedy in animation is no different than comedy in non-animation. And the context of ‘television’ also doesn't make animated comedy different from other animated comedy. I've long had in my mind the question of how to combine genres (of fiction) films, TV programmes and TV series into a single hierarchy, since the actual cinematic genres of fiction use the same methods and narrative - the genre conditions do not change due to the form of the work. And such items only worsen the situation, not improve it. In categories this is normally resolved with "category combines topics" property, the most amount of categories crossing concepts on enwiki should certainly not be created as separate concepts on WD. I can also assume that if we start allowing things like these, at some point we'll eventually end up with the items like "midnight comedy adult animated stop-motion television series". Solidest (talk) 09:52, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to agree. I think perhaps that we should have a common category for television and film when it comes to animation. Insted of animated action film and animated action television series we could have animated action, animated fantasy, animated drama etc.. Ezzex (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure these things have enough of their own notability in isolation from the shared genre. For example, how would an animated fantasy differ from a live-action fantasy? My guess is nothing, since any 'cinematic' (incl. animated) fantasy is mostly just about setting and story, the genre being drawn/3d-animated doesn't bring anything new to change the core genre. Yes, we have ‘genre x format/type’ classes, but this has always only caused problems rather than helped (and was rather forced due to the existence of wikipedia articles). And besides, 'animated x' itself is not that clear thing in the hierarchy now - it's a type, it keeps getting reverted to genre, but actually it's just a film by production technique. And then this brings us to "stop-motion animation fantasy" and so on, which would be needless. Solidest (talk) 23:46, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Would a RfC be useful for this subject? Trade (talk) 01:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q108701811

[edit]

Q108701811: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not sure if this person existed at all. Author didn't leave any links but information seems to be taken from rodovid. The person said to be a daughter of Yakov Sheremetev and mother of Fiodor Kern. But according to The Peerage and Geni Yakov didn't have children and Fiodor's mother was another woman Q132151229. Pegas24 (talk) 21:33, 5 February 2025 (UTC) --Pegas24 (talk) 21:33, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"according to The Peerage and Geni Yakov didn't have children" - they don't specify, and are incomplete. Q108701811 and Q132151229 are probably intended to be the same person but it's unclear whether The Peerage and Geni are any more reliable than Rodovid. A better source is needed - this is part of the reason I oppose addition of items based on self-published and user-generated genealogy sites (or in this case, without any source). Peter James (talk) 23:44, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q131727392

[edit]

Bardia Rahmany (Q131727392): Persian- Swedish Entrepreneur, owner of My Parking in Sweden AB, owner of QR Management Group, and MMA fighter: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self written, lack of notability. Self promotional. --Notthedot (talk) 22:06, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:11, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q17270000

[edit]

football club (Q17270000): organization which fields teams in a sport known as football, such as association football, rugby, American football and Australian rules football: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

This item is based on the polysemy of the word “football” in the English language. Lepticed7 (talk) 15:59, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:01, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not just the word, the sports are related, with origins in Medieval football (Q3293439) (see also football codes (Q1081491)) but mostly based on association football or rugby. All of the items I looked at that link to it are futsal clubs, a form of football based on association football (Q2736) that does not have the word "football" as part of its name in English. Peter James (talk) 18:17, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
heh, probably one of the first items I created a long time ago. tbh, I don't know that much about "polysemy" and the rules for it on Wikidata. So opinions from others welcome :) Bthfan (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q29129893

[edit]

Q29129893: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of Label Q29129890 --Karldupart (talk) 14:50, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:41, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Identifier is the same (PM14000203), but it says it's in the sacristy, whereas Q29129890 is in the refectory. I think the identifier is wrong - when created it had PM14000202 in the description, the same as Q29129892. Does https://pop.culture.gouv.fr/notice/palissy/PM14000202 describe two distinct objects (Q29129892 and Q29129893), forming the group Q29129891, or is it one object? And if it is more than one, are the components notable, or only the group? And should the identifier be on the group, or the components? Peter James (talk) 23:55, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q125200987

[edit]

Libya El-Amin (Q125200987): Film/TV editor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, very unclear why this item was created. Multichill (talk) 18:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Looks notable to me, the three references on the item should be enough and according to Wikipedia she's an award winning editor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Reel_Awards_of_2024#Technical_categories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genius_(American_TV_series)#Accolades see also https://www.instagram.com/blackreelawards/p/C-oSfzMOmV1/ Piecesofuk (talk) 19:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q110088878

[edit]

Untitled (Q110088878): 2017 mural in Jamaica Plain, Boston, by Fernando Ayala: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No reference, possible duplicate Dsgdataengineer (talk) 20:56, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly the same as Untitled (Q117034948), but that is from 2016; is there another from 2017? Possibly not enough here to identify it. Peter James (talk) 23:08, 16 February 2025 (UTC) Could be the "Untitled" mural at https://www.trending-in.com/mass-murals-jamaica-plain/ - https://theartwalkproject.com/jamaica-plain-art-walk describes it as "Tribal Geometric Mural". Coordinates approximately 42.319381,-71.111514. Although that is also from 2015 or 2016. Peter James (talk) 23:38, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q132399301

[edit]

SALT.agency (Q132399301): search marketing agency: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable Trade (talk) 16:54, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Winner of the Queen’s Awards for Enterprise (UK’s most prestigious business awards); added references... 2001:BF7:830:BC03:1492:F6EE:5216:8595 06:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q131983373

[edit]

Dan Taylor (Q131983373): podcaster and marketer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 16:58, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q131845082

[edit]

Giuseppe Galvagna (Q131845082): Expert dentist and specialized surgeon: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Is being dentist already noteworthy? There are some scholarly articles mentioned in Wikidata but their co-author is Salvatore Galvagna, not Giuseppe Galvagna. --2001:9E8:D48F:D800:ED2:92FF:FED1:D909 18:29, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I find a single scholarly article and it's not authored by him, it's by Salvatore Galvagna and two different Giuseppes. Also, it's about HIV, not something a dentist would research. Samoasambia ✎ 18:00, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q1759284

[edit]

Q1759284: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Ambiguous item. I've stripped most of it into deductible (Q25416267), straight deductible (Q132560103), out-of-pocket costs (Q132560207), franchise deductible (Q5010281). I put any concept that includes both straight deductible (Q132560103) and co-insurance (Q132560916) into out-of-pocket costs (Q132560207). Daask (talk) 03:25, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:31, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Daask: what about identifiers? and uses? --Infovarius (talk) 19:17, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q29168504

[edit]

Farid Alizade (Q29168504): Azerbaijani entrepreneur and public figure: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion Nemoralis (talk) 23:04, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:11, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q132677119

[edit]

AfS (Q132677119): Academy for distance learning in the field of SEO: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 15:23, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:31, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q132725658

[edit]

Magnus Garde (Q132725658): CEO of Athreon, a speech-to-text and cybersecurity company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 15:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:31, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q125208144

[edit]

Kendall Martin (Q125208144): Catalan basketball player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No linked, probably autopromotion --Patrickpedia (talk) 09:05, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've found news coverage of how this basketball player has been banned from playing professionally because she's a trans woman. Is that enough for notability here? DS (talk) 22:35, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 17:46, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q76124772

[edit]

Alex Parker (Q76124772): (born 1990): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only genealogy, not notable. --Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 14:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:51, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought "is listed in The Peerage" is enough? DS (talk) 22:24, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's a self-published source with many entries only citing "e-mail message to Darryl Roger Lundy" (but in this case, Burke's Peerage is cited as a source, so possibly notable). Peter James (talk) 12:45, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q50375131

[edit]

Rein Alaküla (Q50375131): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Bot-generated. Not notable Estopedist1 (talk) 20:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
From what I can tell, this was a possibly notable Estonian agronomist. He was married to someone who Google Translate seems to indicate was "brigadier of pollination?" (if you can do better with this Estonian news article from 1963, go ahead) , and the parent of a notable Estonian journalist. There may also have been some government role; it's hard for me to tell. I wouldn't be surprised to find that Rein Alaküla had authorship credit on an academic article, but I wouldn't know where to look. I can find biodata for him. Is that worth adding? DS (talk) 22:16, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q50375133

[edit]

Laine Alaküla (Q50375133): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Bot-generated. Not notable Estopedist1 (talk) 20:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
From what I can tell, this was a Estonian... scientist? Possibly with a government role? Google Translate seems to indicate "brigadier of pollination"? (If you can do better with this Estonian news article from 1963, go ahead). Also she was the mother of a notable Estonian journalist, and married to a possibly notable Estonian scientist. I wouldn't be surprised to find that Laine Alaküla had authorship credit on an academic article, but I wouldn't know where to look. I can find biodata for her. Is that worth adding? DS (talk) 22:18, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q110771888

[edit]

Handbook of German Art Monuments, 1. Edition (Q110771888): edition of the Handbook of German Art Monuments by Georg Dehio: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

There is no first edition of the Dehio book series because each volume is updated independently, so an edition number can only be assigned to a volume. See also de:Dehio-Handbuch. --Bruno413 (talk) 13:25, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:31, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q132830176

[edit]

Marcel Byttebier (Q132830176): Flemish Contractor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable person --DovaModaal (talk) 20:14, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:21, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q2986550

[edit]

Archives Commission (Q2986550): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I found no authoritative source within French government, historical or otherwise, mentioning a "Commission Des Archives" solely. Thadguidry (talk) 10:28, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, there was an article on frwiki (fr:Commission des archives) but it was deleted in June 2020. Samoasambia ✎ 16:26, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
From en:Armand-Gaston Camus: "Camus is considered the founder of the Archives Nationales, as in 1789 he was appointed as archivist of its predecessor, the Commission des archives of the Assembly (Estates-General). He served in this role until his death." Also mentioned in https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/term/BIOG222677 and other sources. Peter James (talk) 18:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:17, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q19816325

[edit]

Bob Rosen (Q19816325): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears to ne non notable, no sitelinks, no properties nor identifiers other than the instance of and sex qualifiers. ToadetteEdit (talk) 10:47, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:51, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
IMDb identifier added. (t) Josve05a (c) 15:16, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133163106

[edit]

Jon Stojan (Q133163106): American digital marketer (1982-): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 19:09, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:11, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just created this item while investigating what I suspect is a ring of advertising on Wikidata performed by Q133163152. More comments to come. Daask (talk) 19:19, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Further information at Wikidata talk:WikiProject Counter-Vandalism § Ascend Agency and Corgilover365. Daask (talk) 20:42, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lexeme:L1407516

[edit]

الله يلعن زمن المشي الكلب من قدام/Allah yil'an zaman el-mashi el-kalb min qiddam (L1407516): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A slang expression for complaining, not a lexeme Mohanad (talk) 06:29, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mohanad, thanks for reviewing my entry. A slang expression for complaining is a lexeme, by definition. Am I wrong? TheJoyfulTentmaker (talk) 07:59, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @TheJoyfulTentmaker, please read lexeme article on Wikipedia --Mohanad (talk) 08:05, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: This is an idiomatic Levantine Arabic expression that clearly satisfies the Lexeme property. Levantine Arabic is mostly a spoken language, so I am scanning the social media to document end record idiomatic expressions in this language. You can find other similar lexemes I have added here. TheJoyfulTentmaker (talk) 19:17, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I searched the idiom above in multi-search engines and got only one result, the user's page on incubator --Mohanad (talk) 21:01, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for looking it up. Levantine Arabic does not have a standardized writing. If you go to the social media post, it is written using the Turkish/Latin Alphabet as: "Allah yilğen zemen meşşe ilkelp minkiddem". The comment has 14 likes, and someone commented that: this phrase continues as: "vil kağed ilhiddami şamğa den". So at we have dozens of native speakers of this language confirming the existence of this phrase. If this was a well-established language, I would have accepted the criticism about using social media posts to document phrases. But this is a developing, indigenous language. Especially, the local dialect spoken in Cukurova is considered an endangered language. So this evidence is sufficient, in my view, to include this phrase on WikiData. TheJoyfulTentmaker (talk) 21:13, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@TheJoyfulTentmaker: I am prepared to close this as not done, since proverbs in different languages are fine to add as lexemes (languages like Bengali, Hindustani, and Italian have multiple such lexemes), but note the following:
  • I can accept that sourcing information about this language may be difficult, but for whatever sources you do find (be these on social media or elsewhere) please add them to the lexeme itself, rather than merely tracking them on a different site entirely. Should a source happen to be on social media, you may wish to find a way to archive what's on a post, ensure that the information you are trying to refer to actually appears in the archive (given that a Wayback Machine of a Facebook post may not preserve all comments), and link to that archive as well. I added an example of a way to do this to the lexeme: while it currently excludes an archive URL, it uses a URL pointing to a specific comment, and it includes the Turkish spelling used in the original post.
  • Given that the Incubator page to which Mohanad refers also cites a Wikiquote page, please also remember that "pages on [...] other Wikimedia sites[...] are not appropriate as sources for Wikidata statements", so as part of your sourcing efforts you should not cite that Wikiquote page on the lexeme.
  • If there are in fact 'dozens of native speakers' confirming the existence of the phrase on that post, please also cite other comments with the spellings used of that proverb (assuming they naturally may differ) in the way that the first spelling has been noted.
  • Note also the slight changes I made to the glosses on that lexeme, which future contributions of yours should try to resemble.
  • If an explanation of that proverb exists somewhere (either on that post or elsewhere) please similarly cite it on the lexeme sense. (How do I know that the frustration expressed by that proverb isn't directed at something completely different?)
Please go back and address these issues on this and the other lexemes you have created first, and once those issues have been addressed I will close this as not done. Mahir256 (talk) 22:02, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Mahir256 hope you fine, just for your information, the above idiom is considered an insult in Islam, and as you know the majority of the Levant are Muslims, my meaning can be made clearer from this link --Mohanad (talk) 00:33, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Mohanad Creating a lexeme for an insulting or offensive word or phrase does not mean we support or agree with it's usage, and statements can be added to clarify that a meaning is offensive. Most languages spoken by Muslims also have a large number of insults directed at followers of other religions and the fact that for example, the Punjabi lexeme for "Hindu" includes a number of insult meanings like ਹਿੰਦੂ/ہِندُو (L1073048-S6) is not intended to offend Hindus or highlight the prejudices of Muslims, but to inform people that these offensive uses exist. عُثمان (talk) 16:13, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@عُثمان believe me, it's worthless, just a shallow meaning starting with a curse of time, and the curse itself is not part of the meaning, it's sometimes used by some people to express sarcasm and frustration (even it's prohibited) Mohanad (talk) 17:58, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Mahir256, this feedback was very helpful! I added the archive links for the present item, and I will fix the others whenever I get a chance. I hadn't realized there were two separate instances of this idiom in the comment thread by two separate Facebook users, thanks for adding both! And Mohanad also seems to acknowledge the existence of this phrase. (Regarding other concerns, as عُثمان pointed out, documenting these expressions, by no means, implies that we are using them or encouraging their usage. Once we document them, it would be easier for anyone to reference them and share these kinds of concerns, however they feel appropriate.) TheJoyfulTentmaker (talk) 01:49, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don't. To be honest, it's my first time, but I know other slang expressions that use the same syntax. In my opinion, social media posts are not always a reliable source and the number of likes is not a reliable indicator for sure. --Mohanad (talk) 02:07, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q107092313

[edit]

pier (Q107092313): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not appear to be notable Quesotiotyo (talk) 22:49, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at this entry, and I thought "that feels like it's by Roger Nice Eyes", and indeed, it's by one of his socks.
That said, is "a specific pier in Ireland" a "clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references"? DS (talk) 03:51, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Surprisingly, this might actually be notable, if only marginally. This is known as Knockaphort Pier, and is the landing for ferries to Inishcaltra (Q1625333). It was the subject of a local news story in 2017 when a car rolled off the pier with a baby inside. Omphalographer (talk) 02:35, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q63035132

[edit]

Q63035132: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Completely unclear what this is; the statements variously suggest a character, a human, or a nonhuman (“female organism”); the place of birth actually points to a fictional work; the Behind The Voice Actors character ID (P5107) looks completely unrelated; the YouTube video ID (P1651)’s meaning is unclear TweetsFactsAndQueries (talk) 17:06, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:11, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently it’s linked from Los Lunnis (Q3790329) as characters (P674), along with the much more bare-bones item Q63035128. TweetsFactsAndQueries (talk) 18:50, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q116506331

[edit]

Thomas Stinco (Q116506331): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability not demonstrated. I deleted statements that are obviously or most likely wrong before deciding to request deletion. Dorades (talk) 20:24, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:32, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Lewis family

[edit]
  1. Q123457269 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q123437797 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Notability not demonstrated. Including the usual wrong statements regarding P106, P737 etc. on the child's item. Dorades (talk) 20:31, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q111670040

[edit]

AC4400CW (Q111670040): fictional diesel-electric locomotive from the 2009 video game Train Simulator: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is a duplicate of Q1097466, and falsely claims that it is fictional locomotive in a train simulator game (it is a real locomotive). --4300streetcar (talk) 20:30, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:42, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q105421675

[edit]

Transworld Tutorial College (Q105421675): distance learning institution of higher learning in the United Kingdom: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Clearly not notable enough per WD:N: almost no statements and no references (I search quickly online with no success). VIGNERON (talk) 08:32, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: A correspondence school (Q11962263) that appears in printed educational directories from the 1970s and 1980, e.g. British Qualifications (1977), Never too Late to Learn (1982), and Education Year Book (1985). Variously spelled "Transworld", "Trans-World", and "Trans World". -Animalparty (talk) 16:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133267631

[edit]

USA Priority Security (Q133267631): facility services company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No evidence of notability Omphalographer (talk) 21:41, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:50, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q30108329

[edit]

Olaf Kosinsky (Q30108329): German photographer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Missing relevance. This person (Olaf Kosinsyk) was blocked by a steward on all Wikipedia sites due violation of basic rules, paid writing and misuse of sockpuppet accounts. Raised a scandal in German media on discovery of his "wikipedia consultance" activities. --RIMOLA (talk) 00:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The item fulfills the structural need (linked from many other pages), and it also contains some external link describing the subject. So technically, two of three notability/relevance criteria are met.
I am not sure if WMF has a kind of... 'cancel policy'? or something. There were ex-Wikimedians who caused even more harm to the wiki-movement and seems there were no challenging discussions whether the Wikidata items about them should be deleted or not -- I mean, ignoring the notability policy. --Wolverène (talk) 07:33, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment It did fulfil structural need just because of it's use on Commons. We should probably do a clean up on its use on Wikidata. Not sure on all the use on image (P18) like for Eva Menasse (Q431884) is really necessary. Fralambert (talk) 23:07, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q13485189

[edit]

Euchrysops osoris (Q13485189): species of insect: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Obvious error: Euchrysops osiris (Q5406033) --Christian Pirkl (talk) 18:26, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both names have multiple distinct identifiers, so it's not super obvious. From a cursory search, osiris seems to have been the original spelling (as Lycaena osiris, Hopffer 1855; note there is also a junior homonym, Lycaena osiris Otto Bang-Haas, 1927). Basionyms and replacement names are generally kept as separate wikidata items, with linkages, but I'm not certain how typographic errors are best handled. -Animalparty (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133733760

[edit]

Q133733760: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Same as Q113640722 Thieu1972 (talk) 20:35, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment They seem different, one is a monastery, the other a congregation. Fralambert (talk) 20:39, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q60464321

[edit]

Inception Automotive Detailing (Q60464321): company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not appear to be notable; connected item Q60511355 may not be notable either despite a stub in arzwiki Jamie7687 (talk) 01:36, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:41, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133803652

[edit]

Behnam Bagherzadeh-Rahmani (Q133803652): Researcher, lecturer and athlete: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

WD:N Arian (talk) 09:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Page was deleted on Farsi Wikipedia due to lack of notability. See fa:بهنام_باقرزاده_رحمانی and fa:بحث:بهنام_باقرزاده_رحمانی. — Chrisahn (talk) 14:18, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Probably meets notability based on authorship of The effect of aerobic training and consumption of L-carnitine supplements on Gen expression of HMG-CoA reductase and LDL receptor in the liver of male Wistar rats Injected by Boldenone (Q129579401). William Graham (talk) 20:09, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Have you checked to see if he's the actual author? Trade (talk) 17:25, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Trade You should be able to check he's the same author by comparing articles listed on his website with those stored on PubMed, for example https://hamishefit.com/iron-dependent-programmed-cell-death-ferroptosis-aerobic-exercise-in-the-elderly/ and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38306027/ Piecesofuk (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:11, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q130270891

[edit]

Tidal Flow (Q130270891): Bangladeshi hard rock and heavy metal band: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? — Haseeb (talk) 09:31, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:42, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133256737

[edit]

Rémi Morin (Q133256737): Search marketer strategist and dj producer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 17:08, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rémi Morin (Q133256737) Q133256737
Two Notable releases musics from musicbrainz database (source) added :
- Q133809613
- Q133809590
Will add the rest of musics releases after review. MisterTopical (talk) 19:15, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:51, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q132239758

[edit]

Oleksandr Tunyk (Q132239758): ukrainian marketer and tourism specialist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 17:09, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:11, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
https://knute.edu.ua/blog/read/?pid=12299&uk Tunyk (talk) 18:48, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong reply

Bulk deletion request “Michael Bauer Group”

[edit]
  1. Q122293401 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q122293488 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q122293892 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q122294876 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q122294992 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q122296419 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q122295749 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q122294904 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q122294897 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q122299313 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

notability not shown and only links between each other Gymnicus (talk) 21:12, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q89790727

[edit]

Q89790727: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unsourced purely promotional item. Adamant1 (talk) 04:31, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:41, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I unlinked it. Things were linked wrong anyway. Can someone delete it now? --Adamant1 (talk) 00:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133365244

[edit]

Hirohiko Suzuki (Q133365244): Japanese businessowner (1981-): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, ja:Wikipedia‐ノート:削除依頼/鈴木博彦, for LTA promoting an individual that has been deleted in jawiki for many times. Aqurs1 (talk) 09:02, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There's a sitelink to Wikiquote and thus meets WD:N. Needs to be deleted on jawikiquote first. Mbch331 (talk) 09:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Currently at rfd process in jawikiquote and I'm disscusing with local admin there, please place this as on hold. Aqurs1 (talk) 10:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't set {{Notdone}} on purpose. So the issue of the existing sitelink could be solved locally. Mbch331 (talk) 10:58, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133806489

[edit]

Suzukoh Corporation (Q133806489): Japanese　wholesalebusiness: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, ja:Wikipedia‐ノート:削除依頼/鈴興, for LTA promoting a companmy that has been deleted in jawiki. Aqurs1 (talk) 09:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Has 1 incoming link from an item that currently meets WD:N. Mbch331 (talk) 09:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q111470050

[edit]

Shiksha (Q111470050): nonprofit organization from India: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Purely promotional item. The only thing it's referenced to is the Indian governments company database ID, which applies to every company in India. Adamant1 (talk) 18:26, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is literally no reference from the indian governments company database you mention. All references are from GuideStar.org (Q5615419). And this is not Wikipedia with promotional items, but Wikidata. So, "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references." see Wikidata:Notability. Best NGOgo (WikiProject Nonprofits!) 19:22, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@NGOgo: Fair enough. I thought Goldstar was a government database for some reason. Regardless, I don't think it confers notability anyway since it has no other inclusion criteria then something being a company. As you point out, the item has to be "described using serious and publicly available references" and the link is dead anyway. A single dead reference isn't "serious references." --Adamant1 (talk) 21:43, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The link was not dead at the time of creation and the data is still valid. It can be used to create an overview of NGOs in India, i.e. here.
Why would you delete information like this? Unlike Wikipedia there's no overhead or maintenance work connected to it. NGOgo (WikiProject Nonprofits!) 10:25, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133808567

[edit]

Otto Schmidt (Aschersleben) (Q133808567): Entrepreneur and paper merchant in Aschersleben: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable - identifiable? Lymantria (talk) 19:08, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, you did not have a look, User:Lymantria. Just have a look in the Commons category: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Otto_Schmidt_(Aschersleben)
And there will come more (I have more). Best regards. --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 19:34, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are right, that makes the subject identifiable. --Lymantria (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contributions by Capsfiz

[edit]

non-notable, self promotion Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:45, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
I am the subject of some of these entries, and the creator of others. My name is Serdar Özen, a professional wedding organizer based in Turkey, with over 25 years of experience. I am the founder of Serdar Özen Organizasyon, which has organized many celebrity weddings covered in national media. Each wedding listed here has verifiable news coverage, and I am gradually adding references and interlinks.
I understand that some items may currently lack descriptions or external references. I am actively working to improve and complete the items with:
Descriptions in multiple languages
Reliable sources (national press, TV coverage, etc.)
Connections to existing Wikidata items
Please do not delete them prematurely — I kindly request time to finish updating them. I’m happy to provide additional verification if needed.
Thank you for your understanding,
Serdar Özen (Capsfiz) Capsfiz (talk) 02:47, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q66828762

[edit]

Robyn Ward (Q66828762): Businessperson from the United States: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This person is a paid speaker as a startup coach. The only independent sources I could find were podcasts she did <1k YouTube channels. I made this item years ago but now think it should be deleted. 1Veertje (talk) 10:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@1Veertje I have no problem to delete this item, but it is used by Commons [10]. So she actually fulfil WD:N #3. Fralambert (talk) 21:57, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I xreated this and the other items I nominated recently back in 2019 because I'd taken it upon myself to catalogue the photos of the The Next Web conference. The WD:N I had in my head expressly made Commons not one of the significant links that would make it not enough of a reason for the creation of an item here on Wikidata, which would make sense since there isn't much of a filter for who can be included there. I guess this woman is a bit of an edge case. She does try to get publicity, but so far, like I said, the interviews she's had were with small time YouTube channels, and speaking at this conference. I guess we can be favorable to her and keep it, I was going through all the items I made in 2019 that weren't also linked to WP because a fair few are of people that were entirely without any reporting. 1Veertje (talk) 11:33, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Ok, it don't seem to be use as structural data, so ok for deletion. Fralambert (talk) 18:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Fralambert Commons categories confer notability per WD:N #2. This is surprising but generally a settled matter. --Emu (talk) 19:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Emu I don't agree with this but the use of structural data on Commons do give a structural need to the item. Fralambert (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q66828761

[edit]

Peter Sorgenfrei (Q66828761): Businessperson from Denmark: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only indebendent source I found was a podcast with 16 reviews on Spotify. I made this item ages ago but now think I shouldn't have 1Veertje (talk) 11:45, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q64629306

[edit]

Johan Schaap (Q64629306): Entrepreneur from the Netherlands: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The photo in this item says they won the "Next Web Award" 2007, but there isn't much to find about this person on the internet atm. I made this item ages ago, but now think there's not enough info for an item 1Veertje (talk) 12:10, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q67202282

[edit]

Vicenç Martí (Q67202282): Entrepreneur from Spain: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No independent sources, I shouldn't have made this item 1Veertje (talk) 13:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133260240

[edit]

Fahaduzzaman Omi (Q133260240): Musician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable person. clear advertisement. Borhan (talk) 15:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:41, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133280896

[edit]

Abdul Momin (Q133280896): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable for wikidata. User created his own page. Nahid Hossain (talk) 11:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q66783449

[edit]

web design company (Q66783449): company that designs websites: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Repurposed item. Dorades (talk) 18:50, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:51, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133838694

[edit]

Carri Degenhardt Burke (Q133838694): American businesswoman and fluid artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Seems to be closely connected to "City Swipes", for which items were deleted two times (Q126996470 -- created by Daremize, Q129331593). Since I can't see the contents of the item, I can't judge for sure if it's a recreation or not. Dorades (talk) 17:59, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It's not a recreation as I see, the two other items are artist studios. Fralambert (talk) 17:02, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder if it is an attempt to deceive us since at least one ID (Instagram) and one url used in described at URL (P973) are the same as in the deleted items. Not sure if this behaviour means someone wants to circumvent undeletion process since recreation didn't work out. --Dorades (talk) 20:14, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's clearly related. It also has two references and a bunch of (largely social) identifiers, so we can assess it on its own merits. Bovlb (talk) 16:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133802133

[edit]

Heart Sutra. Narthang version. (Q133802133): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 15:04, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133865693

[edit]

Q133865693: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Existe déjà Chirocca77 (talk) 17:34, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is probably different from Q11321186 -- that one is for the taxon, Q133865693 is for Caridina typus used as seafood. However, I do not mind if the items will be merged. --Wolverène (talk) 19:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q12848241

[edit]

Zakir Kərimov (Q12848241): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable person. --Yousiphh (talk) 18:49, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this helps escalate deletion, I found the link to the Azerbaijani wikipedia deletion page: https://az.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipediya:Silinm%C9%99y%C9%99_namiz%C9%99d_s%C9%99hif%C9%99l%C9%99r/Zakir_K%C9%99rimov Tæppa (talk) 21:46, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q115913821

[edit]

Dubit (Q115913821): video game development company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 18:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:01, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Company mentioned in en:Jean-Charles Capelli. Fralambert (talk) 01:44, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q62089827

[edit]

Farhad Garashov (Q62089827): politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. All Wikipedia articles got deleted due COM:ADVERT. --Yousiphh (talk) 14:36, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:41, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No evidence - nor even any attempt to make a case - that this is an advert. Appears to be a notable politician. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
He is not a politician. Not even a notable person. Yousiphh (talk) 07:00, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There does appear to be some Azeri-language coverage via Google News... is it enough, I couldn't say (especially without translating it all). DS (talk) 17:39, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
'Coverage in the news' by Azerbaijani local media? Come on, this can't be the reason for this person's notability. Yousiphh (talk) 20:35, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q76230916

[edit]

Mervyn Smith (Q76230916): Peerage person ID=622580: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable person, simple genealogy. --Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 16:18, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:21, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request of items created by User:XsLiDian

[edit]

May not be "clearly identifiable conceptual or material entities that can be described using serious and publicly available references" (Wikidata:Notability). The misuse of subclass of (P279) makes Q133820253 a government agency (Q327333), a document (Q49848) and a controversy (Q1255828) at the same time, which is clearly wrong. dringsim 18:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep They are subclasses to create instances from. For example, for the document :File:湖南省通信管理局不予受理告知书 (2025年1月17日).pdf, I create 湖南省通信管理局不予受理告知书 (2025年1月17日) (document instance) from 湖南省通信管理局不予受理告知书 (subclass), which is subclass of other appropriate subclasses.
All subclasses I used for documents can be verifable with a legit document already uploaded to Commons, which can then be verified in-person with respective authorities (government, court etc). If you suspect I uploaded false documents, you have a chance to put me in jail, because forging them is forbidden by the criminal law of my residence. XsLiDian (talk) 18:41, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
See also the tree of the classes of Q133820253, which is currently messy. dringsim 05:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q106147872

[edit]

Mauro Rosero (Q106147872): Colombian Artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unsourced purely promotional item for a non-notable person. Adamant1 (talk) 04:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:51, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete and Mauricio Rosero (Q110875025) and Lina Rose (Q110998930) probably too. --Hannes Röst (talk) 20:29, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q116958048

[edit]

prescription dog food (Q116958048): animal or pet supply: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability not demonstrated. Dorades (talk) 06:33, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think we can assume notability when there is Google Product Taxonomy ID (P11302). Samoasambia ✎ 10:33, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so; how is it useful to have this specific item that apparently doesn't match any other concept present on Wikidata? We're not a commercial site, so I doubt it's useful to have an item for "prescrption dog food" as long as it doesn't fulfill WD:N #2 or #3 (which is not the case over 2 years after creation). --Dorades (talk) 19:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth, I can personally confirm that this is a thing. I'm somewhat surprised that the English Wikipedia doesn't discuss it in detail, but it's hinted at by some other articles, e.g. w:en:Hill's Pet Nutrition#Prescription Diet, w:en:Diabetes in dogs#Diet, etc. Omphalographer (talk) 02:43, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133974956

[edit]

Mass graves in Pryvitne (Q133974956): Mass graves of Soviet soldiers in Pryvitne (Swiniuchy): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wikidata item Q133974956 has no claims. Please add some. --.taras-fedora-syn (talk) 19:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@.taras-fedora-syn: Umm, that is an item you created. Currenly it doesn't pass notability. Samoasambia ✎ 19:23, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Goldsmith family

[edit]
  1. Q111303568 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q98158691 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q98157720 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q98156846 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q56615169 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q46975806 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q98155518 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q113712132 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q133974987 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q133973833 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for example Sharon Hennagin Goldsmith (Q98155518) passes WDN3 as she was the wife of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Goldsmith, the mother of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Goldsmith and the sister of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Hennagin Piecesofuk (talk) 06:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Are you suggesting to keep all of these items? Because Ryanne Asher (Q111303568) for example is herself not notable, as far as I can tell from the item, and has no parent, sibling, husband or children that is obviously notable. --Dorades (talk) 06:43, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Dorades Not necessarily, but I checked a few of the lower numbered items and they seem to pass WDN3 as they are the immediate family of Jerry Goldsmith (Q235077). Not sure about Ryanne Asher (Q111303568), probably borderline as there is no direct link to Jerry Goldsmith (Q235077) only via her mother Carrie Goldsmith (Q56615169) who would pass WDN3. I expect it's only worth considering the two most recently added items which possibly could by deleted. Piecesofuk (talk) 09:04, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like also to note that most of these items are completely unsourced, some have empty IMDB IDs and some have a Facebook profile which I doubt represent the persons in question (typical for the creator of these items). --Dorades (talk) 09:12, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete unless a reliable reference can be provided. --Hannes Röst (talk) 20:25, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Always & Forever

[edit]
  1. Q124452335 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q131196826 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q124727245 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q124452245 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 17:38, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q130546451

[edit]

Incredibox - Sprunki (Q130546451): 2024 music video game developed by NyankoBfLol: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Clearly promotional material Chó Vàng Hài Hước (talk) 08:56, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:01, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I do not think it is "promotional material" (AKA made for advertising). This item was created 7 months ago when the mod first started getting attention by millions of people online. As such, it was probably not made by the creator of the mod to promote their Scratch game. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 02:44, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q108386221

[edit]

Eugen Apostol (Q108386221): former director of the State Jewish Theater of Bucharest: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unclear who this is, no inlinks and only a defunct pdf as description Sabelöga (talk) 10:10, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

At a guess it's a Romanian actor. There are a number of similar items that were created about the same time that refer to that pdf, see https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?search=opus4-ubp%2Ffrontdoor%2Fdeliver%2Findex%2FdocId%2F1061%2Ffile%2Fbercovici.pdf&title=Special%3ASearch&ns0=1&ns120=1 and they seem to have some connection to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israil_Bercovici Piecesofuk (talk) 13:25, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I remember that I tried to rescue those items back in 2021. I dig a little deeper and added a few statements, notability should be clear now. --Emu (talk) 17:19, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134029841

[edit]

Muhammed İnci (Q134029841): Turkish actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? 0x0a (talk) 16:54, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q118646171

[edit]

Divine Mercy (Faustina Kowalska) (Q118646171): Catholic devotion: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Repeated item --Anjo-sozinho (talk) 07:50, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:01, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q116769117

[edit]

Ashiq Nabi (Q116769117): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable person. --Yousiphh (talk) 21:57, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q124007668

[edit]

Alakbar Alakbarov (Q124007668): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable person. --Yousiphh (talk) 21:57, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q48136350

[edit]

New Mexico—Japan Liaison Office (Q48136350): U.S. State Government Office: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability not demonstrated. Dorades (talk) 21:34, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:41, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q128833295

[edit]

PREDETERMINED TIME STUDY APPLICATION AS A MEASUREMENT TIME STUDY CALCULATION TOOL (Q128833295): scholarly article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Apparently, this article is not listed in either of the 2018 issues; the DOI only resolves to the main page of the journal. Dorades (talk) 22:42, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I found it on ResearchGate... sort of. DS (talk) 18:33, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the link; I am not sure if that does make a difference. It seems strange that the journal that apparently published this article originally, does not list the article anymore and there is no retraction notice or anything. I wonder if that's because of an intentional removal on their behalf or maybe because of the quality of the journal in general which seems a bit unreliable. --Dorades (talk) 12:59, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133248894

[edit]

Meiji Jingu Gaien Ice Skating Rink (Q133248894): skating rink in Tokyo: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability not demonstrated. Dorades (talk) 22:56, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be an Olympic-sized rink? Does that make a difference?
DS (talk) 18:36, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The item does satisfy this criteria of notability: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references." And as stated in WD:N, satisfying one criteria is enough. Thanks!
I am not convinced by the listing on the TimeOut website which only contains very basic characteristics of the rink. Do you have other references? --Dorades (talk) 11:01, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Gulf of America

[edit]
  1. Q132215363 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q132215708 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q132215460 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB) They were specifically created to separate intentional redirects.

--LIrala (talk) 03:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133976416

[edit]

Filmhouse Cinemas Ventura Mall (Q133976416): cinema house Ibadan: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N King ChristLike (talk) 15:40, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I added a ID. Fralambert (talk) 15:14, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q128211686

[edit]

Borhan Uddin (Q128211686): Bangladeshi Wikimedian: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self publicity, no proper reference --103.239.253.17 07:43, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment @Emu Already have a Rfd: Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2024/10/05#Q128211686 It was keep because he was a prolific user on Commons. Fralambert (talk) 14:48, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Fralambert To be precise: It was kept because of the Commons category (WD:N #1). Personally, I think that Commons categories shouldn’t be grounds for notability but WD:N #1.4 ex negativo implies automatic notabibility. I’m very much against items for Wikimedia contributors (see also User:Emu/Notability#Wikimedia-related_stuff). --Emu (talk) 17:04, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q131721913

[edit]

Category:Ukrainian pronunciation (Q131721913): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Just a Commons category Midleading (talk) 09:25, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:31, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q123695069

[edit]

Rome et ses renaissances (Q123695069): organization in Paris, France: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doublon avec Q51780242 --Vicartbsu (talk) 12:23, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q119731130

[edit]

Laura Grüb-Geschwindt (Q119731130): Latin American composer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Item for a composer that I’ve found referenced only in a single source, Q119730716. A user claiming to be the composer based on their username (@Lauragrub:) keeps changing the date of birth but has yet to provide a source or respond to messages. The date of birth may very well be wrong in that one source, and given that this composer doesn’t appear to have any other sources or identifiers regarding them, perhaps the best path forward is simply to delete this item. Gamaliel (talk) 13:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't look like anyone's left any messages on her talk page. If someone is brand new (which this user apparently is), messages in edit summaries are not an optimal way to communicate with them. DS (talk) 15:50, 5 May 2025 (UTC)'[reply]
I have done so. This user has not responded to pings and messages from multiple editors, but they are going on Wikidata to alter the birthdate on a daily basis. It seems like they are unable or unwilling to communicate. Gamaliel (talk) 15:48, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep There are several other sources on Google Books. We certainly can’t delete the item on notability grounds. Although judging from Ancestry, the birth date given in the source seems to be correct, we might want to treat this as a potential WD:LP issue and remove the date of birth (P569). Except there isn’t really any real evidence that this might be a legitimate privacy issue. --Emu (talk) 17:33, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Could you add those sources to the item please? I did an extensive search and was unable to find anything beyond the one book already cited that established notability. Gamaliel (talk) 19:01, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q100869599

[edit]

Jan Chmelař (Q100869599): Czech visual artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion only. CatherineSyevyerskaya (talk) 07:45, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134283273

[edit]

Jagatjot Singh (Q134283273): Indian engineer, researcher, and lifestyle content creator: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, self promo --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:31, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134394464

[edit]

Faramarz Tabesh (Q134394464): Faramarz Tabesh is the founder of Research Institute Andishe Online Germany (AOG), specializing in cognitive science, biology, physics, psychology, and more.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 14:24, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:31, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q64867099

[edit]

Q64867099: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, Japanese label & description only. --Tæppa (talk) 21:30, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:43, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced claim on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q64867093#P180 along with Q64867154 (used also on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q60441905#P180 ). Could be made notable if a Japanese speaker can clarify. Tæppa (talk) 21:54, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q60211989

[edit]

Q60211989: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, Japanese label & description & "kana" only --Tæppa (talk) 21:31, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:43, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced reference on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q60175430#P180 . Could be made notable if a Japanese speaker can clarify. Tæppa (talk) 21:52, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q131935368

[edit]

Samuel Kocanda (Q131935368): Czech jurist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lack of notability, deleted elsewhere - notably on the Czech Wikipedia, only surviving link is a collection of pictures at Commons. --Hieremias (talk) 08:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also on ORCID - does that make a difference? (Genuine question.) DS (talk) 12:14, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Anyone can register an ORCID. Having one doesn't imply notability. Omphalographer (talk) 22:43, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q131839048

[edit]

Gulf of America (Q131839048): Wikimedia redirect: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, only redirects Ameisenigel (talk) 14:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request of items created by User:Dongshin

[edit]

Wikidata is not used to store a sentence and each of its characters with separate items. Midleading (talk) 12:15, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q108624316

[edit]

UA1 (Q108624316): an analytical resource dedicated to reviews of online casinos, bookmakers and poker rooms: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:42, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134406315

[edit]

Sujit Kumar Mishra (Q134406315): Indian Actor, Author and Software Engineer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, spam Bodhisattwa (talk) 07:47, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:57, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q28970130

[edit]

Elnur Elturk (Q28970130): journalist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. --Yousiphh (talk) 14:45, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q111474168

[edit]

İbrahim Nuri Bülbül (Q111474168): director: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Lymantria (talk) 19:31, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q110872984

[edit]

Seyed Mohyeddin (Q110872984): male given name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam Trade (talk) 22:41, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:31, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q102407628

[edit]

Markus Rosellen (Q102407628): Dr. rer. nat. Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn 2002: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unclear relevance --131.220.249.43 08:02, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q123818782

[edit]

Gárdos (Q123818782): given name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No source, no reference, no link, no instance, no occurrence: nothing whatsoever to support its existence Adam78 (talk) 10:04, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:11, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is an issue of someone misunderstanding Hungarian name order (Q110475755 is a valid entry, but it's a surname, not a given name). DS (talk) 22:20, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q133934426

[edit]

Shamim Hossen (Q133934426): Bangladeshi journalist and lyricist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, cross-wiki spam, all sidelink pending delete. Aqurs1 (talk) 20:31, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134086071

[edit]

Nikita Singh Yadav (Q134086071): Indian athlete: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promo -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 21:12, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q112183359

[edit]

Diego Caverzasi (Q112183359): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A sitelink exists in the item, and it is currently not nominated for deletion. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 18:08, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134454378

[edit]

Q134454378: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N King ChristLike (talk) 18:32, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134454361

[edit]

Q134454361: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N King ChristLike (talk) 18:33, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:51, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134454361

[edit]

Q134454361: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N King ChristLike (talk) 18:36, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:51, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134453412

[edit]

Q134453412: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N King ChristLike (talk) 18:39, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:51, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134452544

[edit]

Land Route (Q134452544): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N King ChristLike (talk) 18:40, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is a book created of a exposition, seem notable [11]. I added some data and references. Fralambert (talk) 23:34, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134359797

[edit]

Hitesh Laxmichand Patel (Q134359797): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N King ChristLike (talk) 19:00, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134385489

[edit]

Prison (Q134385489): 2025 movie by Ekrem Engizek: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N King ChristLike (talk) 19:01, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134414157

[edit]

Lydia Georgantzi (Q134414157): international actress active in Germany, Greece, and the USA: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N King ChristLike (talk) 19:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q19724400

[edit]

Budhi Achmadi (Q19724400): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I am proposing the deletion of this Wikidata item because I have changed the title to Ahmedu Augustine Obiabo (Q16201415) and it is a different person Badak Jawa (talk) 08:54, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q4217972

[edit]

Cacheuta Spa (Q4217972): human settlement in Argentina: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Title is "Cacheuta Spa" and defined as "settlement". False. There is a "settlement", in human terms a village, called Cacheuta - not "Cacheuta Spa". Administratively, it's acknowledged with a district: Cacheuta district on openstreetmap. Note that it's not "Cacheuta Spa district" or Cacheuta Hot Spring District" or whatever else.
I've got enough trouble with merging Cacheuta Spa (Q89614118) and Cacheuta Hot Springs (Q5015987), i don't need that parasite. It's got to be either renamed "Cacheuta" without further qualificatives, or deleted altogether. Thanks. --Pueblo89 (talk) 12:28, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw that there are articles on Cacheuta village as administrative entity : https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cacheuta and equivalents, links in that page. So better rename Q4217972 if possible (else someone is gonna recreate the damn page wrong again). Pueblo89 (talk) 12:41, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:31, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q131935368

[edit]

Samuel Kocanda (Q131935368): Czech jurist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Irrelevant, vandalism, mobbing, breach of rights --Jáchymeček (talk) 17:39, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:41, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jáchymeček Please don't blank the item, it don't help us. Fralambert (talk) 20:02, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q131941527

[edit]

area vasta of Aosta (Q131941527): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The dubject of the item does not exist Ysogo (talk) 20:35, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:41, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ciao, l'argomento in effetti è stato oggetto di discussione con altri contributori. Sono arrivato alla definizione dell'Area Vasta di Aosta nel mio lavoro di correzione sulle province italiane. La valle d'Aosta non ha Province ma sul sito del Governo ho trovato questa definizione che ho trovato opportuna:
https://presidenza.governo.it/governoinforma/documenti/province_cittametropolitane.pdf
"‐ Le province italiane oggi esistenti sono 110, includendo l’area vasta di Aosta". Dato lo statuto speciale comprendo tutti i limiti con cui possiamo definire l'item.
Se l'item non viene comunque ritenuto opportuno, ringrazio in anticipo per la motivazione che userò per aggiornare le informazioni sul "Wikidata:WikiProject Italy/Administrative divisions"
Saluti FabC (talk) 04:47, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q127512137

[edit]

Policy:Universal Code of Conduct (Q127512137): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Vandalism Midleading (talk) 03:18, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134456423

[edit]

Tomás Cassule Ganga (Q134456423): Criador de conteúdo digital angolano: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, self promo --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134530800

[edit]

Mirro (Q134530800): SaaS HRIS platform with performance management, employee engagement and talent retention features: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I created this item but on second thought I think it's quite redundant with another item created by me, Q134530272. --White-rabbit-beer (talk) 15:15, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q18627523

[edit]

This page should be merged into Q5877486, as it serves the same purpose but in different languages. However, due to ValterVBot's extensive multilingual descriptions, the "Merge two Items" option doesn't work. Additionally, raid protection makes the process of deleting entries individually very tedious.

Furthermore, the Afrikaans language links currently direct to multiple separate pages that should ideally be merged as well. For example, Sjabloon:Styg redirects to Sjabloon:Wins, while Sjabloon:Daal should redirect to Sjabloon:Verlies to maintain consistency. While I have a sufficient understanding of Afrikaans to recognize this issue, I'm not be able to articulate that clearly for an editor proficient in the language.

If anyone is able to assist with this matter, your support would be greatly appreciated. 84.87.111.104 16:24, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134530718

[edit]

Circle Line (Milano) (Q134530718): Milano upground trains line: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No Circle Line in Milan exists. Sources come from an unrelyable website ★ → Airon 90 16:39, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:41, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Kurt Fischman

[edit]
  1. Q134480000 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q133456965 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 17:46, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134470803

[edit]

UnitedDataHub (Q134470803): Structure-driven engineering system for transforming websites into machine-readable, index-prioritized, and semantically linked data environments. Semantic Web.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:16, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q134455917

[edit]

Damien Oulagnon (Q134455917): Consultant SEO: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:19, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q3743575

[edit]

Portomaggiore-Bando railway (Q3743575): railway line in Italy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

As discussed in it.wiki there are no source to confirm the presence of this railway. Moliva (talk) 20:20, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q100275325

[edit]

Roig-Juñent (Q100275325): family name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not actually a double barreled family name but two Spanish family names in hyphenated form Monster Iestyn (talk) 21:31, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:41, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh right, whoops, fixed, it was just Sergio Roig-Juñent (Q21338291) as mentioned below. Monster Iestyn (talk) 21:43, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For extra clarification: This item was created only for Sergio Roig-Juñent (Q21338291), but the Argentine nationality and aliases of this person suggest to me they are likely two separate family names in the Spanish tradition, paternal and maternal (see e.g. en:Spanish naming customs). Monster Iestyn (talk) 21:41, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q58459423

[edit]

Anna Hafþórsdóttir (Q58459423): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a clearly defined concept nor used anywhere Sabelöga (talk) 22:01, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit group QSv2/246752

[edit]
Summary {{{summary}}} Author Bpasseri
Number of edits 348 (more statistics) Example edit Q134536677


empty items created with no label

Bpasseri (talk) 23:36, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions&oldid=2351029895"