Shortcut: WD:RFD

Wikidata:Requests for deletions

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Requests for deletions
Items which do not meet Wikidata's notability policy can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions on this page under the "Requests" section below. If it is obvious vandalism, just add the page here (gadget available), or ping an administrator to delete it. Contact can also be made with an administrator in #wikidata connect.

Before deleting items, check to ensure that they are not in use. This can be easily done with the "links" link below the header of each request.

Do not try to pre-emptively delete an item because its page is up for deletion on a Wikimedia project. The link will be removed by bots and reported here in the future if a deletion takes place.

Please use {{Q}} the first time you mention an item. Unless you use the gadget, please also ping the item's creator in your request (or ping the bot operator, when appropriate) if 1) the user is still active on Wikidata and 2) the user has contributed the majority of information in that item.

Please use Wikidata:Properties for deletion if you want to nominate a property for deletion.

This is not the place to request undeletion. Please use Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard instead. If help is needed with the merging of items, see the instructions at Help:Merge.

Add a new request


On this page, old requests are archived, if they are marked with {{Deleted}}. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at November 19.

Project
chat

Lexicographical
data

Administrators'
noticeboard

Development
team

Translators'
noticeboard

Request
a query

Requests
for deletions

Requests
for comment

Bot
requests

Requests
for permissions

Property
proposal

Properties
for deletion

Partnerships
and imports

Interwiki
conflicts

Bureaucrats'
noticeboard

Requests for deletions

medium

61 open requests for deletions.

Contents

Pages tagged with {{Delete}}[edit]

None at the moment

Click here to purge if this list is out of date.

Requests[edit]

Please add a new request at the bottom of this section, using {{subst:Rfd |1=PAGENAME |2=REASON FOR DELETION }}.



Example biographies[edit]

Q29962164[edit]

Example biography (Q29962164): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I would just delete it but there seems to be some external (mis)use. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 07:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
@Kjetil r: You should use Wikidata Sandbox (Q4115189), Second Wikidata sandbox (Q13406268) or test.wikidata.org for this purpose or take advantage of arbitrary access and create a real-world example. --Pasleim (talk) 13:02, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
I suppose Wikidata Sandbox (Q4115189) and/or Second Wikidata sandbox (Q13406268) could be used in some cases, but we also have a legitimate need for having a semi-stable dummy item that could be used for documentation purposes. I don't know test.wikidata.org very well, but is it really suitable for such use cases? For example, the birth date and death date of [1] do not appear in the infobox at [2]. Regards, Kjetil_r (talk) 15:25, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Q30049473[edit]

Example biography 2 (Q30049473): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I would just delete it but there seems to be some external (mis)use. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 07:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
It is being used for test, development, and documentation purposes on no.wikipedia. Isn't that within scope for what we can do? Regards, Kjetil_r (talk) 13:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

@Matěj Suchánek, Kjetil_r: I am not sure, but wouldn't Douglas Adams (Q42) (or something else) be better as an example? Bencemac (talk) 14:07, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

I need an example item where I can add or remove data at will when I work on making changes to infoboxes. I can't really do that to Douglas Adams (Q42). Regards, Kjetil_r (talk) 14:39, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Q47465141[edit]

Ishwor (Q47465141): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is nothing. -- MovieFex (talk) 04:55, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep it's about a film
    --- Jura 05:31, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Still no sources. -- MovieFex (talk) 05:37, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete Jura1, this film doesn't really exist, it's just a HOAX of IMDB. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:48, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
    • How did you arrive at this conclusion? Do you have anything to support it?
      --- Jura 07:08, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
      • @Jura1: Before such comments, can you please just Google this name to find senseful references? If that even can't show at Google, then how do you think that such hoax items are just allowable because "it's a film" lucky reason? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:49, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
        • Well, being indexed by whoever isn't a requirement. Please don't misquote me. How is Amazon's IMDB relevant to your explanation?
          --- Jura 06:32, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. I've reviewed the discussion above and lean towards the conclusion that this film didn't actually exist. If another editor can show me external evidence (IMDB or elsewhere) that shows this film exists, I'm happy to change my vote. Deryck Chan (talk) 16:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Deryck Chan, Jura1: What do you think of this page? I don't know how much of it is true... --Okkn (talk) 15:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
      • Looks legit but the year is different from that on the item. Changing to Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral. I have left a message to the item creator. Deryck Chan (talk) 15:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
      • I think MovieFex attempted to have the list at enwiki deleted, but failed.
        I can understand that it may be difficult for some to conceive that are films that aren't available at Amazon's, but be reassured, it exists and that's when Wikidata starts getting helpful.
        Obviously, it's sub-optimal when films lack their original title. Isn't this the film where an excerpt is available on U-tube? Maybe @Bipin Sapkota: can help us.
        --- Jura 15:37, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete per liuxinyu970226, there's no film called this name existing, thus this item is rather like an original research. --218.68.229.42 01:27, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
    • Maybe you can answer the question liuxinyu left open? What do you make of the link provided?
      --- Jura 06:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
      • @Jura1: While I don't know who is this IP user, should I consider your question as "hey, we should create 65535 billion items, and should never delete them because 'they are films'!"? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:51, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
        • In case you missed it. The questions I think remained open: "Do you have anything to support it? " and "How is Amazon's IMDB relevant to your explanation?". Maybe you can answer the additional question to the IP too. Btw, I think you confused film and item about a film.
          --- Jura 15:11, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Perhaps any of @Biplab Anand, BRPever, Nabin K. Sapkota, Nirmal Dulal, Bijay chaurasia, Pitambar Bhattarai: can help us resolve this case or find someone else who can resolve this case once and for all. We definitely need better references regarding this film's existence and its characteristics than just film database entries and questionable snippets from YouTube. To those I have pinged, the sorts of references I am looking for are similar to those I added to Chhori Buhari (Q47465325), excluding those references to a Wikipedia list page (which I will remove soon). Also to those I have pinged, this is a standing request to you and other Wikimedians from Nepal that if any other Wikidata-related event in Nepal is to occur of a similar scale to what happened on January 20th/21st, you must inform me or Jura about it so we can potentially monitor what is going on as it happens and so we can prevent a further deluge of deletion requests due to the incompleteness of items. Mahir256 (talk) 15:23, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Maybe a note on WikiProject Movies would be helpful. I don't think I want to have to monitor every editathon. After some re-factoring, I think the one in January did give some interesting entries. Obviously, it's more difficult if there aren't plenty of sources. I'd rather fix a few entries than have people wait till they think they get it perfect.
--- Jura 06:08, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep seems to exist, there's even a movie poster Germartin1 (talk) 15:11, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Q28824100[edit]

Part of Your World (Q28824100): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Blank Shizhao (talk) 02:11, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

@Valentina.Anitnelav: Thoughts on this and the two below requests by @Shizhao:? Mahir256 (talk) 23:46, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
I created these while cleaning up song-items with multiple performer (P175)-statements indicating performers of different versions. I just checked if a version by this performer exists and can't say anything about their relevance beyond that, but they seem notable by being clearly identifiable and helpful to name different performers without messing up the item about the work/original version. - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 13:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
@Mbch331:, so that you are aware of @Valentina.Anitnelav:'s comment and can decide whether to undelete the appropriate items. Mahir256 (talk) 00:09, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
I'm not entirely sure a cover on YouTube is enough to make an item notable, so I restored the item and added it here so the notability can be discussed. Mbch331 (talk) 16:27, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Q23010193[edit]

Fairfax Asia (Q23010193): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No wikipedia article linked, no source in the entry (discovered the entry from Alltrust Insurance Company Limited (Q23010725) which listed Fairfax Asia (Q23010193) as shareholder without source; end up only find out the shareholder was cited as Fairfax Financial (Q1393210) (or its branch or its China-incorporated subsidiary and namesake) I am not sure we should have every non-notable division and subsidiary of every notable mega-conglomerate, but such item may be more effective to merge with Fairfax Financial (Q1393210), rather than over preciously list out the most accurate corporate structure that list out every legal person in en:Matryoshka-like line of ownership, unless have external source and the intermediate holding company had potential content as least as part of a section of wikipedia article. --Matthew hk (talk) 02:06, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:10, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Q55236988[edit]

Open Educational Resources (Indian River State College) (Q55236988): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No incoming links, no references, only a website. Not notable. Randykitty (talk) 14:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

@Oa01: Thoughts? Mahir256 (talk) 23:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
@Mahir256: The webpage is a bibliographic entity. Traditional bibliographic databases such as WorldCat include metadata records for this type of information resource. See, for instance, series of pathfinders from Cornell University or Greenville, South Carolina represented in WorldCat:
Perhaps people involved in the WikiCite initiative would be interested in this question too? -- Oa01 (talk) 11:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Q50822451[edit]

list of Doctor Who serials (Q50822451): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unused wikimedia list without wikipedia articles CENNOXX (talk) 09:10, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:20, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
WTF. If the wikiproject subpage exists as a local maintenance page, there should be no item about it in the main space. If its purpose is encyclopedic content, then it falls out of project scope and should be deleted (along with the item about it). In both case, I think this item should be deleted. -Ash Crow (talk) 00:55, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep I restored the sitelink to a reference list at Wikidata.
    --- Jura 06:28, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Symbol delete vote.svg Delete I took another look at Wikidata:Notability and still don't think this item should exist, the added Wikidata list is more or less a portal subpage, which is explicitly excluded in Wikidata:Notability, so without any valid sitelink it still should be deleted.--CENNOXX (talk) 12:17, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Q29053991[edit]

Totur (Q29053991): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Не нашёл. I don't found this river. Мастер теней (master of shadows), 15:39, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:40, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Toturite (mineral): "The mineral name is given after the Totur River situated in Eltyubyu village, also Totur is the name of a Balkarian god".
  • Galuskina I O, Galuskin E V, Dzierzanowski P, Gazeev V M, Prusik K, Pertsev N N, Winiarski A, Zadov A E, Wrzalik R (2010) Toturite Ca3Sn2Fe2SiO12 - A new mineral species of the garnet group. American Mineralogist 95, 1305-1311 [3]
  • Some mineral species from the Upper Chegem volcanic caldera have names form exotic geographical locations. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 02:21, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Chris.urs-o: Totur River is mistake or bad identification. See map neer Eltyubyu village. Мастер теней (master of shadows), 19:52, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Мастер теней. It could be an old name, more than two references should be ok. Creeks in mountaineous region become a river every 3 years. These people are very careful with their publications. How do you write this Bakarian god? Maybe type locality: реки Тотур, крепости Батикли (Кабардино-Балкария, Сев. Кавказ, Россия)? [4] [5] --Chris.urs-o (talk) 02:11, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Chris.urs-o: In oldmaps I found only Тотур (1926) and Дотуръ (1877), but not river. Where крепость Батикли I didn't know. Мастер теней (master of shadows), 12:24, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Мастер теней. Baksan valley or Baksan ruins? Lakargi Mt. (43° 16' 60 North , 43° 6' 0 East)? 43°N 43°E seems fine. These names have a tendency to difuse after hundred years: settler, farmhouse, village, mount, creek, outcrop etc. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 15:23, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Chris.urs-o: maybe, maybe. But we don't have iron source: map or citate «Totur is tributary of Джылгысу». Russin oficial catalog not have river Totur, only ruins (Тотур, развалины: near 43°15' с.ш. 43°19' в.д.). Мастер теней (master of shadows), 00:09, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Oki doki, I will write an email to Galuskina. If the situation is not clarified, I'll change Тотур from river to ruins. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 01:27, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Citation: The name is given after the Totur River situated in Eltyubyu village, the starting point for the climb to Lakargi Mountain where the mineral is found. In addition, Totur is the name of a Balkarian god, and an ancient warrior, after whom the local Totur fortress near Tyrny-Auz and the clan tower, Totur-Kale, at Eltyubyu are named.
Galuskina's answer: "...In the first one I put a red target in the google map fragment showing an area of Eltybyu vilage. Locals call the tributary of Dzhylgysu as Tothur. Here are coordinates (43°16'20.1"N 43°08'07.2"E), which I took from google map..." --Chris.urs-o (talk) 16:37, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Q55139155[edit]

no label (Q55139155): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wrong item Yiyi .... (talk!) 22:34, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

I didn't found any other sources for this. But the MIBACT source claims that there is a church with this name in that Cusio city. How can we proceed in these cases? --AlessioMela (talk) 10:05, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Contested items about Wikimedians[edit]

These were nominated before all the others below them. Mahir256 (talk) 18:43, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Q4818445[edit]

Attila Szervác (Q4818445): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotional item with the main contributor being the subject of the item, and all/most sources beeing self created. The main source is the photo of ID card. --Jarekt (talk) 18:43, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:50, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Has a Commons sitelink. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 06:49, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete Agree. As a Wikipedian, creating a Commons category for my works does not make me notable. Bencemac (talk) 19:09, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Q28469412[edit]

Subhashish Panigrahi (Q28469412): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Disputed notability. Item was previously deleted but undeletion was requested at Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard --Pasleim (talk) 21:01, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep at least until we can establish whether or not this was linked to other items, similarly deleted with no discussion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:04, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Has a commons category, so is notable per the first line of WP:N. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 13:33, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
    • @Mike Peel, WD:N line 1.4 explicitly excludes Commons categories without other interwiki links from granting notability. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 16:24, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
@Taketa: It does, but a) that's disputed, and b) that only applies for category items, while this is a topic item. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:00, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete Wikimedian with a job. Multichill (talk) 16:44, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per Benoit Soubeyran case, please let @Psubhashish: send an against email to OTRS instead, if you as an admin really wanna delete. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
    • @Liuxinyu970226: First of all, you guys are making me feel important. On a serious note, I wasn't aware of these discussions and thought the entry was deleted. I can send a mail to OTRS but can you please let me know what I need to mention there? --Psubhashish (talk) 04:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Q46108408[edit]

Nurunnaby Chowdhury (Hasive) (Q46108408): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Disputed notability. Item was previously deleted but undeletion was requested at Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard --Pasleim (talk) 21:03, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep at least until we can establish whether or not this was linked to other items, similarly deleted with no discussion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Has a commons category, so is notable per the first line of WP:N. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 13:31, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
    • @Mike Peel, WD:N line 1.4 explicitly excludes Commons categories without other interwiki links from granting notability. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 16:24, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
@Taketa: It does, but a) that's disputed, and b) that only applies for category items, while this is a topic item. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:59, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Q29918442[edit]

Jared Zimmerman (Q29918442): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Disputed notability. Item was previously deleted but undeletion was requested at Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard --Pasleim (talk) 21:14, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep at least until we can establish whether or not this was linked to other items, similarly deleted with no discussion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Now has a Commons category, so meets the first line of WP:N. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 13:29, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
    • @Mike Peel, WD:N line 1.4 explicitly excludes Commons categories without other interwiki links from granting notability. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 16:24, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Is the anonymous contributor to Jared's item Jared himself? Mahir256 (talk) 03:16, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
    @Jaredzimmerman: only you can answer this question. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:41, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
    @Jaredzimmerman: (that's right, you no longer work for the WMF) Mahir256 (talk) 21:12, 2 August 2018 (UTC) oh, hi, It's been a while since I logged in, no the IP user creator/editor wasn't me, I don't really have a desire to have an article, or in this case item about me, but when i saw that it existed, I did add a few dry factual details, my unofficial vote is Delete, but I don't really have much of opinion one way or another.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg neutral It's a bit unfortunate and inconsistent if items about people who possibly edit it themselves get deleted or kept depending on the country they participate from, their past or present employer, or the topic of the workshop they happen to assist. Other than that, I think items about photographers whose images are available at Commons are useful, e.g. Q20167198, at least if they don't mind.
    --- Jura 20:29, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete Wikimedian with a job. Multichill (talk) 16:46, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per Benoit Soubeyran case, please let @Jaredzimmerman (WMF): send an against email to OTRS instead, if you as an admin really wanna delete. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:56, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Q55416440[edit]

Richard Breckenridge Wagner (Q55416440): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Disputed notability. Item was previously deleted but undeletion was requested at Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard --Pasleim (talk) 21:17, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. This person has a FISA rower ID (P2091), which is an authoritative database, not a self-published source. So it marginally meets the "notable" inclusion criterion. This item also makes Narragansett Boat Club (Q55415215) and 2012 World Rowing Junior Championships – Junior men's double scull (Q47604947) more useful and provides authority control information about some of this rower's self-published usernames, but I would argue that these do not confer additional notability. Deryck Chan (talk) 10:08, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per evidence provided by Deryck Chan. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:57, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per the above. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 13:26, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak vote Symbol delete vote.svg Delete, although I edited this page as a member of Wikidata:WikiProject Rowing. Just for his junior rowing we typically wouldn’t create an item about him at this point, although he is listed in the World Rowing database (Q21008628). His FISA rower ID (P2091) is part of a database containing ~50k profiles, of which around 15k are considered relevant for Wikidata at this point (~10k already existing; criterion is: open age international rowing, following notability criteria in Wikipedias). It is also worth to mention here that the item has apparently been repurposed by the subject himself, see this diff. —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
    • @MisterSynergy: 50k is a small dataset in the context of Wikidata. There is no harm in creating individual Wikidata entries for everybody in this authoritative international competitive rowing database in order to link to other databases and items as a means of authority control. Deryck Chan (talk) 16:53, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
      • I'm sure the NYC marathon has an authoritative database on its participants too, but would we create items for each?
        --- Jura 10:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
        • A similar argument applies for FIDE chess players. Mahir256 (talk) 13:19, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
          • I think they only add people above a threshold, not anyone who ever played chess.
            --- Jura 11:12, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete seems to consistent mainly of a list of social media accounts and an identifier not considered sufficient to confer notably by the independent specialist editors.
    --- Jura 12:47, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
    • Neither the inclusion of social media accounts (all properties for the use of which have all been approved by the Wikidata community), nor the lack of approval from "specialist" editors, whatever you might mean by that, are valid reasons for deletion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:20, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep - per above, now referenced by authoritative database, making it fit with WD:N. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 21:05, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete Wikimedian with a job. Multichill (talk) 16:47, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per Benoit Soubeyran case, please let @breckwagner: send an against email to OTRS instead, if you as an admin really wanna delete. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete An entry in a huge database without further notability signs should not automatically imply a wikidata item. Steak (talk) 12:36, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

More contested items about Wikimedians[edit]

It has been requested that more items about Wikimedians deleted by Maarten the week of July 15th be more thoroughly assessed for notability. The subjects of the seven below items did not have a hand (or had a minor hand) in the addition of content to their items. There are six other items that do not fit this aforementioned criteria which I have opted to exclude from the below list; another admin may augment this list with those if they consider a subject's own positive assessment of his or her own notability, by virtue of creating and expanding upon an item, enough to warrant such contestation. Mahir256 (talk) 03:34, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Q45966592[edit]

Nithish P Byndoor (Q45966592): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q41093906[edit]

Tito Dutta (Q41093906): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q28879087[edit]

Dumisani Ndubane (Q28879087): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q28051212[edit]

Abigail Ripstra (Q28051212): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Q23041480[edit]

Rich Farmbrough (Q23041480): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q23041474[edit]

Max McBride (Q23041474): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q42921754[edit]

Sylvain Boissel‎ (Q42921754): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Even more contested items about Wikimedians[edit]

There have been constant protests on the Administrators' noticeboard for the review of every topic item deletion by Maarten from the week of July 14th. These six items, plus a seventh added by yours truly, were all entirely created and expanded (or at least the majority of edits to these items were contributed) by their subjects.

I had previously opted to leave the first six items here deleted, because those items above which I did undelete (and those undeleted items on this subject which I kept when renominated by Pasleim) were not majority or wholly edited by their subjects. I had interpreted this characteristic to mean that someone else had considered them notable enough for Wikidata (at the bare minimum under criterion 2 of WD:N) and thus that their conception of this notability is worthy of being challenged in a forum such as this, as opposed to cases of clear self-promo items created and expanded by their subjects (that conceivably could also be kept under this same criterion) which when nominated are generally promptly deleted by an admin. The question here that should be answered once and for all is whether we should consider a Wikimedian's own assessment of their own notability, such that they decide to create and expand their own items, enough to satisfy WD:N, bearing in mind that we have deleted items by clear self-promoters who have assessed themselves to be notable enough to warrant creation and expansion of their own items. Mahir256 (talk) 01:09, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Q28608893[edit]

Prateek Pattanaik (Q28608893): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q47513628[edit]

Nasir Khan Saikat (Q47513628): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q50310712[edit]

no label (Q50310712): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q53982551[edit]

Benjamín Skála (Q53982551): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q55082210[edit]

no label (Q55082210): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q55413369[edit]

Loizza Aquino (Q55413369): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q55396255[edit]

Shani Evenstein Sigalov (Q55396255): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Yet even more contested items about Wikimedians[edit]

These requests might have something in common, or they might not; in any case they are grouped here since they are related to the above two sections in some way. Mahir256 (talk) 16:24, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Q55818712[edit]

no label (Q55818712): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty David (talk) 08:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

  • Seems to lack refs. Other than that: Pictogram voting comment.svg neutral see my comment above #Q29918442
    --- Jura 22:32, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per Benoit Soubeyran case, please let @Jiv arshu: send an against email to OTRS instead, if you as an admin really wanna delete. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:03, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete Wikimedians are not notable by themselves. --Infovarius (talk) 10:50, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Q56161411[edit]

Rajeeb Dutta (Q56161411): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable peson, no wikilink, no external identifier Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:42, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Has Commons sitelink. Mike Peel (talk) 15:44, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per Benoit Soubeyran case, please let @Marajozkee: send an against email to OTRS instead, if you as an admin really wanna delete. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:50, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete per nom. no external identifier. ~Moheen (keep talking) 04:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Q55818665[edit]

Nirmal Dulal (Q55818665): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable person, no wikilinks, no external identifier Bodhisattwa (talk) 15:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Has Commons sitelink. Mike Peel (talk) 15:43, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment self-created commons sitelink. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 16:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hi Bodhisattwa, I found the same case in these Amir, Bijay Wikidata contents too since a long time, please let me know the updates on the aforementioned discussion and comments. -Nirmal Dulal (talk) 16:50, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
      • @Nirmal Dulal: Please suspend your RFDism to these Wikimedian items, Amire80 does have Russian Wikinews page. --117.14.250.180 02:30, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per Benoit Soubeyran case, please let @Nirmal Dulal: send an against email to OTRS instead, if you as an admin really wanna delete. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:14, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per Mike Peel. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:33, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Q45185239[edit]

Bijay Chaurasia (Q45185239): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable person, self-created commons sitelink, no external identifier Bodhisattwa (talk) 17:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Q56173187[edit]

Indrajit Das (Q56173187): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Queryzo (talk) 06:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Q55686524[edit]

no label (Q55686524): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wikimedian autobio?
--- Jura 04:19, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi! Jura1, just saw this notification, not sure what to do, and yes its my bio ~~ Menashe 12:42, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep unless if Exploter send an email to OTRS that they don't want an item here, the item is valid. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:06, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Where do you see notability? Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 21:29, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Symbol delete vote.svg Delete does not meet notability criteria --Pasleim (talk) 16:48, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Q610491[edit]

parricide (Q610491): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Ill defined item. Split between Q51159758 and Q25425428, can be deleted once identifier moved
--- Jura 14:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

I've restored the labels to this item, that match the name used on the BNCF Thesaurus entry. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:01, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

  • I restored everything. Otherwise it can't be assessed correctly. --- Jura 02:20, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
    • I'm not clear why you have restored labels that clearly refer to a different concept than the linked 'BNCF Thesaurus ID' item. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:35, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
      • At least we agree on my statement at the beginning of this deletion request. --- Jura 18:42, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Q26860142[edit]

Category:User:Mazuritz (Q26860142): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Userpage category Infovarius (talk) 09:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
@Pasleim: Any thoughts on this (as a separate matter from deleting the item about Benoit himself)? Mahir256 (talk) 16:26, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
I don't have an opinion on this item in particular. It would just be nice to have a consistent rule, i.e. either keep all userpage categories or delete them all. --Pasleim (talk) 18:33, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Q55832654[edit]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Meleshoui (Q55832654): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

User specific subpage
--- Jura 04:22, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Was there somewhere a discussion about the notability of user specific subpages?
Should we distinguish between items with one and more sitelinks? --Pasleim (talk) 13:29, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Q56151045[edit]

no label (Q56151045): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. Probably it was intended to be a property? Infovarius (talk) 03:03, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for not deleting, I have a question, how can I classify if it is a property or qualifier, I would like the element premio rechazado (Q56151045) to show that the prize was rejected, for example the case of the Nobel Prize for Literature Boris Pasternak that was rejected. Thank you! (Xlsb (talk) 14:59, 30 August 2018 (UTC))

Q56228301[edit]

surname prefixed with Ó or O (Q56228301) Hi! I deleted this item because it could totally be replaced by this query SELECT ?item ?label WHERE { ?item wdt:P31/wdt:P279* wd:Q101352 ; wdt:P1705 ?label ; FILTER regex (?label, "^(O|Ó)"). }

and seemed then totally out of scope. Jura1 (talkcontribslogs) disagree with me but did not provide any explanation for his need of this item. So since the case is not as obvious as I thought, I ask for fellow advice. Should we restaure this item? Thank you, --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 14:19, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Looks like it's not equivalent: [7]. Some bug in your query?
    --- Jura 15:22, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
    • @Jura1: It is equivalent, if you look at the results it is names with O or O’ instead of O', so just remove the ' and this is exactly equivalent. The query is way better since it give you more results and without the need to add more data into Wikidata. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 13:10, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete per Harmonia Amanda, un-useful complication and no need for this item (so fail even the 3 point of WD:N). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 13:10, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As both statements are incorrect ("it could totally be replaced by this query", "it give you more results and without the need to add more data into Wikidata"), I think we can close this as not done: I count 180 items with the item compared to 178 with the query. Furthermore, the query can't find Q36861066, Q37323459, Q37502370, Q37506527, Q42717190, possibly due incorrect query design or a misunderstanding of the Irish prefix in some surnames. The three others are likely items I started fixing since I created the item. Eventually, we might have a better way to include the same information in a better way, but the approach seems reasonable for now. --- Jura 06:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete unhelpful and needless --Pasleim (talk) 17:06, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. No it's not equivalent. This item is intended to capture surnames that got the O from the Irish prefix. There are plenty of other surnames from other languages that begin with O (using the original query) but didn't get the O from the Irish prefix. Deryck Chan (talk) 10:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Added: same problem surname prefixed with Mac or Mc (Q56219051) --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 14:15, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Q55167519[edit]

no label (Q55167519): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It seems to be wrong: in Luino it does not exist a place called Bosco and I can't identify this church. Yiyi .... (talk!) 21:55, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Pinging @AlessioMela:, whose bot created this. - Nikki (talk) 10:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
I found something in this news. Not much but seems it exists. --AlessioMela (talk) 10:08, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Q36883935[edit]

Edinger (Q36883935): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item, merged with Q243507 Taivo (talk) 16:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:40, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
@Jura1, Harmonia Amanda: Thoughts? Mahir256 (talk) 18:30, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Nope, should be kept separated, one is about a name and the other one is a disambiguation page. Two different things, so two items needed. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 18:33, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Actually I do not understand, what means LUA (Q15184295? How it is relevant here?) and why Harmonia reverted my edits. They are both about the same family name (I checked orthography). Taivo (talk) 07:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
I think the page in German is a disambiguation page. This is not true for w:Erdinger. Accordingly, the items at Wikidata have different statements. --- Jura 07:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
First sentence "Edinger ist der Familienname folgender Personen" means "Edinger is family name of these persons". That means: German article is about family name. All three other articles (French, Polish, Portuguese) are also about family name. Taivo (talk) 17:31, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
I think you would need to remove the notice at the bottom of the page. Otherwise, German Wikipedia sees it as a disambiguation page. --- Jura 17:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Q28605450[edit]

no label (Q28605450): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty. Мастер теней (master of shadows), 18:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:40, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Q56514370[edit]

Hunagrian College of Fine Arts (Q56514370): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is one earlier name the Q844153 (Magyar Képzőmüvészeti Egyetem, not a independent item. (Has no own article) Texaner (talk) 11:04, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:10, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
So, can they be merged, @Texaner:? - cycŋ - (talkcontribslogs) 14:39, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Q55437933[edit]

Havana Reds (Q55437933): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No source given. Steak (talk) 21:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

I think this should be redirected to Habana (Q1264787). Please check (and do). Lymantria (talk) 06:10, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Q56525307[edit]

Gustaf Wilhelm (Q56525307): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Removed from Q4457034, currently unused. It's unclear why this should be a single given name. --- Jura 07:21, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

I restored that, because thats required to get correct categories for the corresponding commons category via commons:Template:Wikidata Infobox. --JuTa (talk) 08:25, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
@JuTa: can provide some reference for this given name and its applicability to this person? If Commons uses some broken algorithm for categories, you need to fix this locally. Please don't merge items or make up names just to match Commons needs. --- Jura 08:47, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Jura, you wanna have a ref that the given name of this person is Gustaf Wilhelm?? Just look to its wikipedia articles, not just Gustaf and not just Wilhelm. PS: The af is an Nobiliary particle that should not be taken into account for family or surnames. Its the swedish pendent of the english 'of'. regards --JuTa (talk) 17:34, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Not sure what article you are looking at. If I get the Swedish one correctly, it just lists two given names and seems to contradict you explicitly on the last name (at least after 1805). --- Jura 18:49, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
You doubt that his name isnt Gustaf Wilhelm but Gustaf and Wilhelm seperatly, and he normaly not get called Gustaf Wilhelm but only either Gustaf or Wilhelm? Strange... --JuTa (talk) 18:56, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
We had Swedish editors complaining about this type of combination: Talk:Q20936782. --- Jura 19:07, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Quote from there: Unless the plan is to create items for all possible name combinations ...
But yes, it is the plan to create all those combinations, or as complete as possible. --JuTa (talk) 22:45, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
We probably understand the unquoted part differently. Maybe it's that the item they mention doesn't have an English label. BTW, there is no such plan. If a person has several names, please add several values to P735. Please stop making up names. We already deleted too many of your creations: Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2018/09/10#Q56545891, Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2018/09/10#Q56528921, Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2018/09/09#Q56529001. --- Jura 05:29, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── In this case, its absolutely two names, Gustaf and Wilhelm, contrary to, especially in the past, when some names were a mix of two original names, like Tor and Björn, which sometimes became Torbjörn. But in those cases the two names were written together, or at least with a dash, like Bengt-Olof. Dan Koehl (talk) 15:04, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Q55594100[edit]

dictionary of the French language (Q55594100): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicates info on dictionary items --- Jura 16:08, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:10, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
@KaMan: Thoughts? Mahir256 (talk) 21:09, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
@Mahir256: I created whole system of concepts starting from dictionary of a specific language (Q55594385) so they should be considered as a whole: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AWhatLinksHere&target=Q55594385&namespace=0 I'm still newbie in how Wikidata works so perhaps I did it wrong by creating these items, but I suppose they can't be just deleted but they first have to be replaced by other equivalent statements. OTOH if we delete them then where we assign their wikipedia sites (like [8]) and commons categories (like [9]? KaMan (talk) 06:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Yes, if missing, data should be added to the items, but [10] clearly needed another fix. There is no sitelink on the above item and commons categories don't need it. --- Jura 08:45, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Q39917302[edit]

suicide by firearm (Q39917302): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No links, and no foreseeable links, to wikipedia for this topic. Also, this will only serve to create confusion, as suicide by firearm is a suicide method, and neither a manner, nor cause of death - it would be liable to be wrongly applied to the properties manner of death and cause of death. Bossanoven (talk) 18:25, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
I'm formally abstaining on this, because I'm the creator of the item. I just point out that the only link to this is Category:Suicides by firearm (Q7190219), which links 15 (fifteen) categories on Wikipedia of people who shot themselves as a form of suicide. Before cancelling the item, I'd suggest to really think about it. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 18:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
@Sannita: The Category:Suicides by firearm (Q7190219) should suffice for that. What is the relevance of bringing that up? - Bossanoven (talk) 21:01, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Q13231082[edit]

Aeolidiopsis ransoni (Q13231082): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Synoniem van Baeolidia ransoni Joopwiki (talk) 11:00, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

So why not just merge these items, @Joopwiki:? - cycŋ - (talkcontribslogs) 06:57, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Genes[edit]

Q18973804[edit]

PF3D7_1404600.1 (Q18973804): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate Magnus Manske (talk) 12:05, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

@Magnus Manske: What is this (and what are the other two below) a duplicate of? I see a couple of things which this could be a duplicate of, and I want to be sure that I merge this item into the right one. Mahir256 (talk) 20:35, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
@Magnus Manske, Mahir256: Doing a quick SPARQL query on genomic start (P644) = 154855, it seeems this is a duplicate of ACalpha (Q18973821)? -- Fuzheado (talk) 16:34, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Q19049452[edit]

PF3D7_0613000.1 (Q19049452): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate Magnus Manske (talk) 12:07, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

@Magnus Manske: Can you confirm this is a duplicate of PF3D7_0613000 (Q19049541)? -- Fuzheado (talk) 16:37, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Q19033865[edit]

PF3D7_0408900.1 (Q19033865): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate Magnus Manske (talk) 12:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

@Magnus Manske: Can you confirm this is a duplicate of KAE1 (Q19034002)? -- Fuzheado (talk) 16:39, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Creations by a blocked user[edit]

Bulk deletion request[edit]

  1. Q56723326 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q56706495 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q56706118 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q56705982 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q56705818 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q56705690 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q56705567 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

likely creations/edits only by blocked user --- Jura 23:35, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Q56871248[edit]

Karl Samuel Anders (Q56871248): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Creation/edits likely mainly by blocked user --- Jura 23:29, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

 Not done - Valid authority control records that establish notability. -- Fuzheado (talk) 16:43, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
  • @Fuzheado: can you clarify your view of the role of a user block? Can they continue to edit Wikidata as IP? --- Jura 17:56, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
    • Even if your unsubstantiated claim that this was created by a blocked user were true, your nomination for deletion came after edits by other users, in good standing. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:58, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
      • And even a blocked user can edit here if they weren't blocked here. A globally blocked user is different than a locally blocked user.Lazypub (talk)
        • @Jura1: This is a request for deletions board - we can only judge things on merits of the item. I'd suggest taking any concerns beyond this to Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard. -- Fuzheado (talk) 13:40, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
        • @Fuzheado: This doesn't answer my question: What is your point of view on blocked users? Can they continue editing Wikidata? Where do you think deletions should be requested if not on Requests for deletion? Is there information you are missing about this user? I understand that this may be your first admin action and you haven't actually been active much on the project admin side of Wikidata. --- Jura 17:12, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
          • @Jura1: It seems you have a greater point to make, so it would be clearer if you just made it rather than posting a series of questions peripheral to it. Multiple folks, not just me, have noted the item has verified authority control records that establish notability by Wikidata guidelines. You are welcome to add more information or recommendations as warranted, but I'm not sure how you are concluding that these are "likely mainly" from a blocked user. @Pigsonthewing, Lymantria, Mahir256, Ash Crow: for more opinions. -- Fuzheado (talk) 18:54, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
            • @Fuzheado: The title of this section, "Creations by a blocked user", links to a successful global ban request on Meta against the blocked user to whom Jura refers (note that we try not to refer to him by name directly on this wiki if possible). There is a large body of evidence that has allowed us to identify this person, including IP geolocations and behavioral patterns on Wikidata, which you may not be aware of; now is a great time for you to identify such things in the archives of this page or Project chat. @MisterSynergy, Multichill, Kam Solusar: as others who have dealt with this user in the past or recently. Mahir256 (talk) 19:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
              • I am getting more convinced that indeed these items are created by a user that is evading a block. In that case I agree that the items should be deleted. Lymantria (talk) 20:42, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
                • So we can waste the time of another volunteer, to recreate the items, with the exact same data? How would that help us? And did you not see my comment pointing out that the "nomination for deletion came after edits by other users, in good standing". Why should their work be discarded? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:41, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
                • @Lymantria: - I have no objections if another admin (or user with higher privileges) acts on this with better information about the identity of the editor which links them to the longstanding block. There was simply no adequate justification and proof provided in the initial request. Cheers. -- Fuzheado (talk) 00:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
                  • @Fuzheado: so you think it's ok to continue editing as IP after a block? --- Jura 03:52, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
                    • As I've written to you already: "If there is strong evidence to show that an IP editor is the banned user, then any standing ban should be enforced. However, the deletion request was not of that nature and did not establish that link." Admin/crat Lymantria (talkcontribslogs) noted the uncertainty of this connection at Q57076143. And as noted above, if someone with checkuser privileges or knowledge discovers that link, they may act on it. -- Fuzheado (talk) 08:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
                      • @Fuzheado: So the item should be deleted if it was created by a blocked user? --- Jura 03:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
                        • As mentioned before, if you're referring to specific policies this would be the right time to point to them. -- Fuzheado (talk) 12:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
                • I don't agree that items should be deleted based on who created them. The items should be evaluated according to our notability policy and deleted if they don't meet it or kept if they do. If someone thinks a user is evading a block, it would be more appropriate to bring it up on WD:AN so their latest incarnation can be blocked. - Nikki (talk) 10:40, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
        • @Fuzheado: I think the question what a blocked user may do after they were blocked isn't really peripheral to question what to do with items they created after the block. --- Jura 18:59, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
        • I agreee with @Pigsonthewing: here: if the items meet the notability policy and their content is correct, there is no reason to delete them only to have them recreated recreated verbatim by someone else. -Ash Crow (talk) 11:49, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
          • @Ash Crow, Nikki: Would you like to propose that the global ban on this user be lifted, then? If not, then what is your view as regards the purpose and the effects of a global ban across Wikimedia projects? @GVarnum-WMF: on this topic as m:SN has not been too much help, I remember him showing up in at least one discussion on WD:AN, and he might know who else within the WMF to get in touch with on this issue. Mahir256 (talk) 00:31, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
            • @Mahir256: No, I don't think it should be lifted. That's why I said that people should let administrators know if they suspect that someone is evading a block. This user is banned mainly because of their inability to cooperate with other people. I see the ban as a way of making it much easier to block them, since we can block on sight based on the fact they are not allowed here, rather than based on any particular bad edits or bad behaviour. I just don't agree that that means we have to undo good edits and delete notable items the user makes while evading the ban. Doing that doesn't help Wikidata and is highly unlikely to deter this particular user, given their long history. - Nikki (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
  • So blocked users can continue to edit? Is this a special Nikki type of block? Why should we be bothered to second guess their block on every new edit? --- Jura 20:12, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Q56872312[edit]

Gustav Friedrich von Adlerberg (Q56872312): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs) Egla Antonie von Wrangell (Q56885511): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Creation/edits likely mainly by blocked user --- Jura 16:19, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

 Not done - Valid authority control records that establish notability. -- Fuzheado (talk) 16:43, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Q57076143[edit]

Vera von Sass (Q57076143): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Creation/edits mainly by likely blocked user --- Jura 15:01, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

What is the problem with the fact that the user is blocked? The item matches its external links. -Ash Crow (talk) 16:29, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
    • w:wp:deny is not a policy here, so do you have another rationale? or do you want to establish consensus to adopt deny? Slowking4 (talk) 18:11, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request[edit]

  1. Q57616561 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q57618151 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q57618484 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

creation/edit mostly by likely block evading user --- Jura 17:28, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

DJs/musical producers[edit]

Q18719084[edit]

Au5 (Q18719084): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No entry exists in the project Jd22292 (talk) 17:04, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

  • Oppose. I do not think Jd22292 understands wikidata notability. This item has authority control refs satisfying WD:N criteria 2. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Q36558205[edit]

Stonebank (Q36558205): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No entry exists in the project. Jd22292 (talk) 17:05, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

  • Oppose. I do not think Jd22292 understands wikidata notability. This item has authority control refs satisfying WD:N criteria 2. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Musical instruments[edit]

Q55738821[edit]

reedpipes with retreating reeds or reeds with lateral/middle cut (Q55738821): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wrong item BohemianRhapsody (talk) 21:39, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

It's not a wrong item, but one item belonging to one of the many revisions of the Hornbostel-Sachs classification. This one has been worked out by the ethnomusicologist Febo Guizzi, and we're are using these entities (we're querying the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint) for the project "Sound Archives and Musical Instruments Collections", held by the University of Turin and by some researchers of the MIMO project (http://www.mimo-international.com/MIMO/). The relevance and publicity of the item has also been referenced, so I ask to not delete the item. --GiorgioBevilacqua (talk) 11:02, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Q55738822[edit]

reedpipes with retreating reeds without lateral holes (Q55738822): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wrong item BohemianRhapsody (talk) 21:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

It's not a wrong item, but one item belonging to one of the many revisions of the Hornbostel-Sachs classification. This one has been worked out by the ethnomusicologist Febo Guizzi, and we're are using these entities (we're querying the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint) for the project "Sound Archives and Musical Instruments Collections", held by the University of Turin and by some researchers of the MIMO project (http://www.mimo-international.com/MIMO/). The relevance and publicity of the item has also been referenced, so I ask to not delete the item. --GiorgioBevilacqua (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Q55738825[edit]

reedpipes with retreating reeds with lateral holes (Q55738825): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wrong item BohemianRhapsody (talk) 21:44, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

It's not a wrong item, but one item belonging to one of the many revisions of the Hornbostel-Sachs classification. This one has been worked out by the ethnomusicologist Febo Guizzi, and we're are using these entities (we're querying the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint) for the project "Sound Archives and Musical Instruments Collections", held by the University of Turin and by some researchers of the MIMO project (http://www.mimo-international.com/MIMO/). The relevance and publicity of the item has also been referenced, so I ask to not delete the item. --GiorgioBevilacqua (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Q55738823[edit]

reedpipes with retreating reeds without lateral holes with fixed tube (Q55738823): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wrong item BohemianRhapsody (talk) 21:55, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

It's not a wrong item, but one item belonging to one of the many revisions of the Hornbostel-Sachs classification. This one has been worked out by the ethnomusicologist Febo Guizzi, and we're are using these entities (we're querying the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint) for the project "Sound Archives and Musical Instruments Collections", held by the University of Turin and by some researchers of the MIMO project (http://www.mimo-international.com/MIMO/). The relevance and publicity of the item has also been referenced, so I ask to not delete the item. --GiorgioBevilacqua (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Q55738824[edit]

reedpipes with retreating reeds without lateral holes with changeable tube (Q55738824): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wrong item BohemianRhapsody (talk) 21:57, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

It's not a wrong item, but one item belonging to one of the many revisions of the Hornbostel-Sachs classification. This one has been worked out by the ethnomusicologist Febo Guizzi, and we're are using these entities (we're querying the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint) for the project "Sound Archives and Musical Instruments Collections", held by the University of Turin and by some researchers of the MIMO project (http://www.mimo-international.com/MIMO/). The relevance and publicity of the item has also been referenced, so I ask to not delete the item. --GiorgioBevilacqua (talk) 11:04, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Q55738530[edit]

edge-tone instruments that are not flutes, or wind instruments orthogonally blown (Q55738530): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wrong item BohemianRhapsody (talk) 22:05, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

It's not a wrong item, but one item belonging to one of the many revisions of the Hornbostel-Sachs classification. This one has been worked out by the ethnomusicologist Febo Guizzi, and we're are using these entities (we're querying the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint) for the project "Sound Archives and Musical Instruments Collections", held by the University of Turin and by some researchers of the MIMO project (http://www.mimo-international.com/MIMO/). The relevance and publicity of the item has also been referenced, so I ask to not delete the item. --GiorgioBevilacqua (talk) 11:04, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Q55738534[edit]

edge instruments not orthogonally blown (Q55738534): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wrong item BohemianRhapsody (talk) 22:05, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

It's not a wrong item, but one item belonging to one of the many revisions of the Hornbostel-Sachs classification. This one has been worked out by the ethnomusicologist Febo Guizzi, and we're are using these entities (we're querying the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint) for the project "Sound Archives and Musical Instruments Collections", held by the University of Turin and by some researchers of the MIMO project (http://www.mimo-international.com/MIMO/). The relevance and publicity of the item has also been referenced, so I ask to not delete the item. --GiorgioBevilacqua (talk) 11:04, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Q55738532[edit]

edge-tone instruments that are not flutes with open and variable chamber (Q55738532): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wrong item BohemianRhapsody (talk) 09:12, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

It's not a wrong item, but one item belonging to one of the many revisions of the Hornbostel-Sachs classification. This one has been worked out by the ethnomusicologist Febo Guizzi, and we're are using these entities (we're querying the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint) for the project "Sound Archives and Musical Instruments Collections", held by the University of Turin and by some researchers of the MIMO project (http://www.mimo-international.com/MIMO/). The relevance and publicity of the item has also been referenced, so I ask to not delete the item. --GiorgioBevilacqua (talk) 11:05, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Q56034651[edit]

no label (Q56034651): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wrong item BohemianRhapsody (talk) 09:40, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

It's not a wrong item, but one item belonging to one of the many revisions of the Hornbostel-Sachs classification. This one has been worked out by the ethnomusicologist Febo Guizzi, and we're are using these entities (we're querying the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint) for the project "Sound Archives and Musical Instruments Collections", held by the University of Turin and by some researchers of the MIMO project (http://www.mimo-international.com/MIMO/). The relevance and publicity of the item has also been referenced, so I ask to not delete the item. --GiorgioBevilacqua (talk) 11:05, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

@Wikizummo: The two classes being proposed here for deletion don't appear in the source given. In general, it would help a lot if you could integrate the items you've created into Wikidata better, for example, by using subclass of (P279) to link items together. Right now there are lots of items which aren't being used in Wikidata for anything, so it's not obvious why they should be kept, which will lead to people proposing them for deletion. - Nikki (talk) 15:34, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
@Nikki: My fault: actually this entity and the following (Q55719474) are not in the source given, since they were added by the cataloguer who is working at the "Sound Archives and Music Collections" project. In this project we developed a cataloguing system based on Collective Access, but since we wanted to make our data accessible and reusable by the online community, we decided to use Wikidata for the management of controlled vocabularies. So we created all Hornbostel-Sachs WD entities (MIMO and Guizzi's version), and developed a plugin (https://github.com/collectiveaccess/providence/commit/eb63850303169fa2f03703db3c5dd62b1e8541e3) that we use to query the Wikidata Sparql Endpoint from the Collective Access back end. But sometimes the cataloguer needs to extend the classification, as for Q56034651 and Q55719474. So I ask you how can I correctly reference them, since we still don't have produced any paper about it (I suppose we'll do it soon, at the end of the project). Maybe I can create an entity for the University project (https://www.slideshare.net/synapta/sound-archives-and-musical-instrument-collections) and use it for referencing?

For the integration in Wikidata: I'll link items with subclass of (P279), but it's a bit complicagted and will take a while. --GiorgioBevilacqua (talk) 13:27, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Q56034788[edit]

no label (Q56034788): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wrong item BohemianRhapsody (talk) 09:40, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

It's not a wrong item, but one item belonging to one of the many revisions of the Hornbostel-Sachs classification. This one has been worked out by the ethnomusicologist Febo Guizzi, and we're are using these entities (we're querying the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint) for the project "Sound Archives and Musical Instruments Collections", held by the University of Turin and by some researchers of the MIMO project (http://www.mimo-international.com/MIMO/). The relevance and publicity of the item has also been referenced, so I ask to not delete the item. --GiorgioBevilacqua (talk) 11:06, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Q7378348[edit]

Rugby union equipment (Q7378348): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merged with no label (Q57418030) --Blackcat (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

@Blackcat: This item doesn't look right to me, it looks like you're mixing equipment with uniform on a single item. - Nikki (talk) 16:32, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
@Nikki: If it's that no problem. Anyway the English article on Wikipedia linked that Commons category, I found already that situation. -- Blackcat (talk) 16:43, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Q57540827[edit]

Lagriamide (Q57540827): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty David (talk) 13:59, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

@David: No more empty. To be kept? — Ayack (talk) 14:36, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Q57628332[edit]

Asen Vladimirov (Q57628332): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sources. -- MovieFex (talk) 18:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:40, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Q57628344[edit]

no label (Q57628344): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sources. -- MovieFex (talk) 18:33, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

I added some information and sources to this item and the one above (Asen Vladimirov (Q57628332)). - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 19:07, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Q12452921[edit]

Inheritance (Q12452921): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 20:12, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

@संजीव कुमार: Is this not a real story collection? Mahir256 (talk) 13:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
@Mahir256: There were many pages about the books of a writer. That writer is notable as we can write an article about him and it is there. But all books are not notable and this wiki data item was also attached with one of the book named "Virasat". Since, we have deleted this article on wikipedia and now I think this item is not connected with any wikipedia page.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 13:44, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
@संजीव कुमार: If it is an actual book by a writer and the item is not otherwise part of a network of spam or self-promotion, then the item may stay on Wikidata. It would of course be helpful if more information was added to it. Mahir256 (talk) 05:25, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
@Mahir256: Author doens't have much credibility, but it is ok to make a wiki-page about the author. Book is not notable et al. If you will search "virasat ramdarash mishra" at google, you will not find anything on google. I searched on different online shopping sites and couldn't find the book. After that we have deleted the page on hiwiki. Since, I don't think this item is useful for us but even if wikidata find them useful, I don't have any problem in keeping them. I don't know much about deletion policy of wikidata about books.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 06:56, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Q7979418[edit]

Weekend Breakfast (Q7979418): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only link is a Wikipedia redirect to an article about the network this program is broadcast on - not sure this is notable enough for its own page. -- numbermaniac (talk) 13:21, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Q57748957[edit]

no label (Q57748957): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable? Jc86035 (talk) 11:13, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Other items by this user might also not be notable (criterion 2 needs independent secondary sources). Commons' structured data would be useful for the pictures, though. Jc86035 (talk) 11:15, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

@Jc86035: What if I create an item called "vandalism in Trento" and put in item Q57748957 and all the others a property that connects to "vandalism in Trento"? Then I would connect with a property the item for the city "Trento" to the item "vandalism in Trento". This way criterion 3 would be met properly, because this would make Trento Q3376 - which already meets the criteria - more meaningful. Thus the items I created would comply with the notability policy. Please correct me if I am wrong, because I have many more pictures coming :) GiordanoArman (talk) 11:37, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

@GiordanoArman: Maybe, but it just seems like the wrong sort of thing to put in Wikidata to me. Imagine if I were to do the same with a million blades of grass: yes, the letter of the notability policy might technically allow it depending on how criterion 3 is interpreted, but the spirit wouldn't. I think right now, without structured data (imagine a Wikidata item for every file on Commons), you would be better off adding these to OpenStreetMap (Q936), with the tag artwork_type=graffiti and a link to the Commons image using wikimedia_commons=*. Jc86035 (talk) 15:32, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
@Jc86035: Thanks, I think there a problem though, defining art those scribbles on OpenStreetMap would be misleading... also because "artwork_type" requires the "tourism" flag, which I think would not be appropriate, those scribbles are definitely not something tourists want to see. My goal is to keep a record of the location and timeline of graffiti and other vandalic acts, in order to be able to observe useful information in the future. If I were a biologist I might be interested in big collections of grass pictures from a certain region, if I could extract valid information through artificial intelligence, for example... so maybe a sociologist might be interested in this kind of data. --GiordanoArman (talk) 21:05, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
@GiordanoArman: If it's not suitable for OSM I still think you should wait until Commons structured data comes out in a few months to a year. For now it's still possible to store the data on Commons. Jc86035 (talk) 04:55, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Agree, Commons:Structured data seems to be a better place for that, even though it needs some time still. --Marsupium (talk) 23:07, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Q29169659[edit]

interpreter (Q29169659): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Original research Infovarius (talk) 15:43, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:50, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Q21874161[edit]

Sidi Ali Osaid (Q21874161): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable, was deleted from all wikis. Adelsheim (talk) 09:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

There are some translation issues with this, but it may help:
Ali ben Said ben M'hamed, known locally under the honorary title of Sidi Ali ben Saïd (in Arabic: سيدي علي بن سعيد ), or Sidi Ali Oussaïd (in Arabic: سيدي علي اوسعيد ) is a saint of the tribe of idrisside souf Beni Ouriemech who lived in the XV th century. He had three sons: Ahmed, Bouazza and Boutaïeb. Lazypub (talk)

Q21555536[edit]

Kissami family (Q21555536): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable, all wiki pages were deleted. Adelsheim (talk) 09:34, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Q56573067[edit]

Superhero Landing (Q56573067): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

At this point this seems promotional rather than notable. Maybe if the article gets accepted at enWP then this could change  — billinghurst sDrewth 20:25, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Q6666553[edit]

Loel Guinness (Q6666553): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The subject of this wikidata page is not a famous or notable person. He is a descendant from a family with several well known ancestors. He is a very private person and desires to remain so. He made the same request to wikipedia and the wikipedia editors decided to delete their page about him. see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Loel_Guinness for a discussion of their decision to delete. --Truthseeker12345 (talk) 23:43, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:50, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Q58025365[edit]

no label (Q58025365): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty David (talk) 07:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
David, It's not empty. it is about a writer Lourdes Guàrdia. she write no label (Q58041689) (Os materiais de apredizaxe en contextos educativos virtuais). I don't know if those 2 item are notable or not. - yona b (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Q9625238[edit]

Category:Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Russian Empire) (Q9625238): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Please see page Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Russian Empire) (Q3251811) --Niklitov (talk) 17:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:30, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This is an item about the category. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Russian Empire) (Q3251811) is about a list. - yona b (talk) 12:01, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Q5466499[edit]

Foothills Alliance Church (Q5466499): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted on enwiki, I am not sure if this is a church or a christian denomination Fralambert (talk) 02:06, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

It is a local congregation, and part of a larger denomination. Senator2029 (talk) 17:42, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Q56265127[edit]

Rodivan'z (Q56265127): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable individual Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:50, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
I added a few items, but I find no reason to keep. They are all self-published items. And I believe the only Wikipedia-related pages that it has been linked to have been deleted. His name is not mentioned on any Wikipedia page that I found. Lazypub (talk)
If we decide to delete this, we also need to remove his two albums which are Wikidata items but linked no where else. Q56451342 and Q56451174. Lazypub (talk)

Bulk deletion request[edit]

  1. Q58010405 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q58177872 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q58188311 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q58191334 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q58193485 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q58193618 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Empty David (talk) 08:19, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

These articles were part of my master classes to teach my students to create elements on Wikidata about scientific articles and books that I am correcting right now. Thanks. --Vanbasten 23 (talk) 10:00, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Q58231425[edit]

no label (Q58231425): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Was testing something, sorry for testing in prod. environment Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:43, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

@Martin Urbanec: Someone co-opted the item; @Yahya Kuadzhe, ჰერცოგ: do you want to keep this item? Mahir256 (talk) 23:47, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Q58231018[edit]

Martin Kraft (Q58231018): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No indication that the subject meets Wikipedia or Wikidata notability criteria. There are no sources to support any of the statement and the whole item seems to be autobiographical. Jarekt (talk) 12:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

I agree, in the current state, the page obviously shows nothing that meets notability requirements. But it was created 10 minutes ago. I would like to see some time given to see what the page looks like in an hour or two. Lazypub (talk)
He has had plenty of time. IMO, it should be deleted. And, in addition, after 4 years of editing and adding photos, for him to self-create an article, we should investigate his other edits. Lazypub (talk)
I created this WikiData item (not an article!) only because somebody complained about a missing WikiData entry on Commons. And before doing so, I checked for other items of Wikimedia contributers and I found quite some of them. Even though I am certainly not an expert on WikiData guidelines, that doesn't seem to be that unusual...
Anyhow, feel free to delete this this entry, if it really violates any rules I wasn't aware of.
@Lazypub: With regard to "Assume good faith", do you really think it's okay, to directly mistrust and insinuate another long-standing wikipedian because of this? I have no idea what insights and dark secrets you hope to gain from this investigation, but if feel like but if you feel like controlling other wikipedians, go ahead investigate! // Martin Kraft (talk) 17:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
  • It seems useful as an item about a relatively active photographer on Commons. --- Jura 20:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Q27909557[edit]

Christopher Brown (Q27909557): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only name and date of birth; no information about occupation, achievements or events, nor any internal or external links, so I have no way to know which Christopher Brown this is Andre Engels (talk) 10:25, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

The edit history shows - 17:38, 24 September 2018‎ Jura1 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (2,982 bytes) (-112)‎ . . (‎Removed link to [enwiki]: Christopher Brown (water polo), #quickstatements; cleanup interwiki that no longer exist - w:Christopher Brown (water polo)) (undo | thank) (Tag: QuickStatements [1.1])
So, at one point, he was linked to something. Lazypub (talk)

Q28040556[edit]

Takhtabad (Q28040556): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

As per Database of Iranian Govt There is no city with this name in Kerman Province Hariva (talk) 06:19, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as there is an article on the frwiki. You may want to make your argument there. - cycŋ - (talkcontribslogs) 09:53, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
I asked for deletion there. -Ash Crow (talk) 22:51, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Q28792126[edit]

Gli (Q28792126): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet WD:N --U+1F360 (talk) 16:35, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Q28779281[edit]

Kristiina Hämäläinen (Q28779281): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty. Deleted from fi-wiki as not notable MiPe (talk) 11:22, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Created on Wikidata as part of Wikidata:WikiProject Finnish Elections. There is wikidata page for all municipality councillor in Finland (Q18694248)'s from 2012 and 2017 elections. They are notable in Wikidata context as part of the election result and as a public representative. --Zache (talk) 12:07, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Q19885657[edit]

Ducati Scrambler 800 (Q19885657): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The item contains no data, obsolte, all links at Ducati Scrambler (2015) (Q24286026) --San Andreas (talk) 18:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Q16416694[edit]

Günah (Q16416694): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Is this film notable? it is mentioned here: https://az.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oqtay_Mirqasımov but not in imdb: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0591926/ Queryzo (talk) 20:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

All that means is that somebody didn't add it to IMDb yet, which happens often.Lazypub (talk)
  • Eventually, I hope we'd be better than imdb. Obviously, this wont happen if we delete anything that isn't there. --- Jura 10:13, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Q5889585[edit]

Homeless (Q5889585): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability given? article was deleted in enwiki due to not indicating notability for this 30-minute Iranian video

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Homeless_(film)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Homeless_(film)&oldid=577496884

Queryzo (talk) 20:42, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

I would keep it (unless there is a rule that says otherwise). The film exists. It's wikipedia entry was redirected, not deleted. Lazypub (talk)

Q58779662[edit]

Unikaryon (Q58779662): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Page exist Jeanloujustine (talk) 11:14, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:20, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
@Jeanloujustine: What's wrong with this item? Do you also want to delete Unikaryon matteii (Q58778909)? --Okkn (talk) 03:50, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, there was a bug somewere, now it's OK. Please do not delete.Jeanloujustine (talk) 18:04, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Q30026110[edit]

Giovo (Q30026110): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty; furthrmore, such a place doesn't exist Syrio posso aiutare? 22:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

@Syrio: This item has a GeoNames ID (P1566) claim. Is it wrong? --Okkn (talk) 04:00, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi! Yes, the municipality seat of Giovo (Q288775) is Verla; an actual village named "Giovo" doesn't exist, and the one highlighted in the geonames website is actually Verla itself. --Syrio posso aiutare? 19:57, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Q58822483[edit]

Chrome Korleone (Q58822483): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable rapper. Out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 18:00, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

I agree that he is non-notable. But I filled in some preliminary information. And he is mentioned on a few Wikipedia articles. So he may meet WD standards. Lazypub (talk) 20:24, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Q12878100[edit]

no label (Q12878100): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Same as Q16328200 FocalPoint (talk) 14:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Q12965594[edit]

Junko Onodera (Q12965594): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability, tl:Junko_Onodera is deleted Ghuron (talk) 14:25, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Q11257092[edit]

Ageha (Q11257092): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability, ja:あげは (AV女優) is deleted Ghuron (talk) 14:29, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Q11608240[edit]

Mana Oda (Q11608240): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability, ja:織田まな is deleted Ghuron (talk) 14:31, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Q12969857[edit]

Reiko Azechi (Q12969857): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability, tl:Reiko_Azechi is deleted -- Ghuron (talk) 14:33, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Q17213213[edit]

Chihiro Mitsuba (Q17213213): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability, see ja:みつばちひろ Ghuron (talk) 16:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

{{subst:Request for MERGE

| itemid = Q54822357 and Q56354967
| reason = the same subject

}} --GualdimG (talk) 19:53, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Q43392179[edit]

no label (Q43392179): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No items link to this. It's an entry for an unknown woman accused of being a witch in the Survey of Scottish Witchcraft database, but no cases or trials in the db refer to this accused person, so it is effectively a perpetual orphan item. --Infomuse (talk) 02:35, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Q43394608[edit]

no label (Q43394608): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No items link to this. It's an entry for an unknown person accused of being a witch in the Survey of Scottish Witchcraft database, but no cases or trials in the db refer to this accused person, so it is effectively a perpetual orphan item. The accused person ID leads to a blank page in the Survey of Scottish Witchcraft database. Creator of item is no longer an active user. --Infomuse (talk) 02:41, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Q43395930[edit]

no label (Q43395930): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No items link to this. It's an entry for an unknown person accused of being a witch in the Survey of Scottish Witchcraft database, but no cases or trials in the db refer to this accused person, so it is effectively a perpetual orphan item. The accused person ID leads to a blank page in the Survey of Scottish Witchcraft database. Creator of item is no longer an active user. --Infomuse (talk) 02:48, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Q58853038[edit]

Corean Menace Society (Q58853038): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty David (talk) 07:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Template:Creator, Template:Institution and subpages[edit]

(delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Template:Creator, Template:Institution and their subpages were very important for development of Commons c:Template:Creator, c:Module:Creatorc:Template:Institution and c:Module:Institution, before Commons had access to Wikidata. Now that it does, we no longer need to experiment here. If there is ever a need for creator or institution templates here we could just import them from Commons. Template:Creator, Template:Institution and their subpages show up in Category:Pages with script errors and use several broken and abandoned templates, so we should either fix them or delete them, and I am voting for deletion. --Jarekt (talk) 13:51, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Q12051182[edit]

no label (Q12051182): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no organisation of that name to be found, only sitelink is redirect Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 15:36, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:40, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Q12051172[edit]

no label (Q12051172): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no entity of that name existing, no information available Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 15:37, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:40, 19 November 2018 (UTC)