Shortcut: WD:RFD

Wikidata:Requests for deletions

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Requests for deletions
Items that do not meet Wikidata's notability policy can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions on this page under the "Requests" section below. If it is obvious vandalism, just add the page here (gadget available), or ping an administrator to delete it. Contact can also be made with an administrator in #wikidataconnect.

Please use {{Q+}} the first time you mention an item. Unless you use the gadget, please also ping the item's creator in your request (or ping the bot operator, when appropriate) if 1) the user is still active on Wikidata and 2) the user has contributed the majority of information in that item.

Please use Wikidata:Properties for deletion if you want to nominate a property for deletion.

Duplicate items should be merged, not deleted: see Help:Merge.

Do not blank items in anticipation of deletion. In particular, do not remove sitelinks, even if you have requested deletion of the underlying project page or if you think that sitelinks of this type should not have Wikidata items.

This is not the place to request undeletion. Please read Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion and either contact the deleting admin or use Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard instead.

More information

On this page, old requests are archived, if they are marked with {{Deleted}}. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at November 29.

Requests for deletions

very high

~234 open requests for deletions.

Pages tagged with {{Delete}}[edit]

None at the moment

Click here to purge if this list is out of date.


Please add a new request at the bottom of this section, using {{subst:Rfd |1=PAGENAME |2=REASON FOR DELETION }}.

Walt Disney Animation Studios film universes (Q101099318): fictional universes of the eponymous film series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not really an established universe. There are some cameos, but not much interaction between properties (barring some specific, separate universes like Q7894222. --(Oinkers42) (talk) 00:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:00, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Keep This is a category of other universes. --RAN (talk) 12:19, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Yes, but the universe itself does not exist, and it being used as a universe in itself. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:38, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Trade We could use your input as creator. Is there outside coverage of this being a shared universe? --Emu (talk) 13:33, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I made this item specifically to connect different Walt Disney Animation Sutiods film universes to each other through P361. Trade (talk) 15:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Trade Yeah, I understand that, but is there a connection apart from those universes all being produced by Disney? And if so, is there a source that says so? --Emu (talk) 10:50, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No Trade (talk) 13:20, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep: per reasons provided by RAN Jack4576 (talk) 12:56, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Delete For sure there's Disney movies that contain fictional universes, but calling them "universe of Disney movie X" or whatever is kind of nonsensical. Like item lists "Aladdin universe", but the movie takes place in the fictional Arabian city of Agrabah. Sure, it's a fictional city, but "universe"? No. Whereas the Great Mouse Detective, which is also on the list, takes place in late 1800s London. Again, that's not a "universe." Really, this whole thing is an exercise in taking the titles of random Disney movies, putting the word "universe" at the end, and calling it a "Disney universe." Which is clearly just non-sensical, unverifiable, and not what Wikidata exits for. What's next, a list of "Walt Disney Animation Studios film universe foods" that lists spaghetti, among other real world dishes, because of that one scene in Lady and the Tramp? Come on. It's at least an exercise in pointless minutia if nothing else. Although again, I don't think its in line with the purpose of Wikidata. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep - not going to supervote by closing this as not done, but I think this should qualify as filling a structural need under WD:N #3. As I've noted in the past, we should air on the side of inclusion so long as it doesn't violate BLP and isn't blatant advertizing. Someone might find this useful. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 14:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jarry Falls (Q109376609): A waterfall attraction centre in Borno state.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? --Dorades (talk) 17:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On the other hand, I've been improving some hundreds of thousands of items I don't want others to delete and my plan is to keep doing so, so I've put your suggestions in practice for years.--Pere prlpz (talk) 22:23, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I looked to see if I could find any other information on this waterfall. Instead what I found were lots of references to Jhari Falls (Q114712215) (aka Jerry Falls) in India. Looking at the photo for Jarry Falls, Nigeria [1], it looks very similar to those for Jhari Falls, India (e.g. file:Jhari_Falls_2k22.jpg, [2], [3]). Am I crazy? Bovlb (talk) 00:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You are definitely right about the picture. I think this could be a mistake by the person who created the website but I don't see how we should find out about the correct name and location of the waterfall in Borno. --Dorades (talk) 08:48, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I found coordinates for Jaffi Waterfalls in a scientific publication ( However, the coordinates given in the article (10°30'11" N 11°50'36" E from p. 4) show a place directly beside a road in the middle of a town. Is my interpretation of the coordinates correct? --Dorades (talk) 09:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Your interpretation appears correct. You'd expect coordinates given to the arc-second to be within about 100 feet. The source omits the arc-second symbol but, even if these were actually decimal arc-minutes, it wouldn't be far away. Bovlb (talk) 15:29, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding PharmaSalud[edit]

  1. Q109425927 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q108627317 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q108634536 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q108653732 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q108444753 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q108655176 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 08:38, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bulk deletion request[edit]

  1. Q110877624 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q110665657 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q110934978 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

The latter two are not notable. Q110877624 demonstrates a strange variety of expertise: a studied psychologist (Orcid), working as a technician (Loop), publishing papers on geology (Loop), being an "OTC Export Order Specialist" (LinkedIn) and baking pizza (Instagram). Dorades (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re Tommaso Colonna (Q110877624) I think the external links conflate two people called Tommaso Colonna: (1) a psychologist (Orcid) and OTC Export Order Specialist" (LinkedIn); (2) a technician, geologist (Loop) and pizza baker (Instagram) who would have LinkedIn id tommaso-colonna-a470498 and who is an author on e.g. Multivariate Analysis Applied to Aquifer Hydrogeochemical Evaluation: A Case Study in the Coastal Significant Subterranean Water Body between “Cecina River and San Vincenzo”, Tuscany (Italy) (Q110541814). The second and perhaps the first look notable once the item is split. Dsp13 (talk) 13:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
What exactly makes the later two non-notable?StarTrekker (talk) 21:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No sitelinks (WD:N #1); no serious and publicly available references (WD:N #2), all the IDs are user-generated content. They are linked together with Tommaso Colonna (Q110877624) and Peter Lizzaro (Q110934978)/Lucía Morales Villa (Q110665657) respectively, therefore I have nominated all three together. In case you are asking because of the stated IDs for Loop, ORCID or Publons: there are zero publications listed on the profiles for both of them. --Dorades (talk) 16:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I see, thank you for the explanation.StarTrekker (talk) 11:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

anti-jewish (Q120439954): person who for various reasons is or acts against Jews for the mere fact of being: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I don’t understand the meaning of this item. How is this an occupation? Why do the labels seem to be adjectives when the item is supposed to describe people (i.e. nouns)? How is an “anti-jewish” the opposite of (P461) of Jewish people (Q7325)? It’s unclear to me how this item could be used in a meaningful way. --Emu (talk) 14:06, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:10, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Comment Compare with antisemite (Q15954665) and antisemitism (Q22649). CC @Cruzate1492 . Bovlb (talk) 16:09, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weird. At least we only have 11 items with occupation (P106)antisemite (Q15954665). The opposite of (P461) statement and a lot of the further modeling doesn’t make a lot of sense there either. --Emu (talk) 22:16, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Delete Bunch of nonsense--Trade (talk) 16:45, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Keep well-established concept Jack4576 (talk) 04:03, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Delete or  Merge as reduntant to antisemite (Q15954665). --Wolverène (talk) 06:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Not necessarily – at least in the German language, Antijudaismus refers to hate against Jews for religious reasons, Antisemitismus refers to hate against Jews on the grounds of some notion of ethnicity. --Emu (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Delete or  Merge per Wolverène. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:24, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Keep - I think this is appropriate to keep as the individual identifier of the concept Anti-Judaism (Q575970). A very technical difference, but semite can refer to a group broader than just ethnic Jewish people. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 21:52, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 DeleteOursana (talk) 01:30, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bee Bee Automotive (Q120484081): French car manufacturer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Bogus item created by known vandal Special:Permalink/1932557235. Gikü (talk) 16:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Same issue:
Gikü (talk) 16:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The link comes from another item in the same list. Gikü (talk) 18:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Adding Q120484304 – same shtick, different IP address. Gikü (talk) 18:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tonggong seems to exist ( but I'm unsure of the reliability of those sources or if they are useful for notability) Bee-Bee Automotive and the Bee-Bee XS exist and the Commons category is not empty but the company is French, not British ( Dida (Q120484237) is a given name (and could be linked from other Wikidata items for people with this given name), not sure the others are. Peter James (talk) 13:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bulk deletion request of part of Orsanmichele Church[edit]

Part of Orsanmichele (Q860816) created by @Westmorelandk24. No source, not notable feature. Fralambert (talk) 15:46, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Oursana, since they made me discover the first part. Fralambert (talk) 15:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
{{withdrawn}} Thank you and will try to make it notable--Oursana (talk) 16:13, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Are you sure? You are the one who first ask the deletion of Central Pier of Orsanmichele (Q116844675). I think that Tabernacle of Orsanmichele (Q116844464) could be nobable, but the other seem empty at best. Fralambert (talk) 16:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Glat Entertainment[edit]

All of these entries were made to promote the work of the Tavera family; a family of so-called entrepreneurs and writers that get help from acquaintances that include politicians and actors in Mexico to make their vanity projects. Regardless of this dubious way to succeed, they used the Wikimedia projects to upload multiple production photos of their movies, articles in various Wikipedias for those movies and their actors and linking to web pages so that people would know their work, which is mostly unknown even in Mexico, especially one of the books they tried to promote up to the point of creating out of the blue an English title for it in the entry even though there's no proof that such book has ever been published in English (see Q115952341). The notability was challenged and all of their eswiki pages were deleted; the main account, Pedro Renteria, was globally blocked after being found that they used sockpuppets in other projects. All of these entries have the names of various members of the Tavera family and their production company, Glat Entertainment. Unfortunately, there are some entries that are part of this promotional campaign which I cannot include in this request due to being linked to pages in the Welsh Wikipedia, which they also used to promote their work (entries Q64863450, Q64996086, Q64996103, Q89678678).. MexTDT (talk) 05:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Emilio Wolf-Ferrari (Q102288846): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non existing person Feraspe (talk) 12:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Feraspe There is an external identifier. Is there any reason to doubt the Archivio Storico Ricordi (Q3621644)? --Emu (talk) 10:11, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I collaborate with Archivio Storico Ricordi and am working on their database. We are in the process of fixing errors on both our local db and Wikidata. Feraspe (talk) 10:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If you prefer, we can hold on cancelling the entry on Wikidata until we do the same on our website (it might take a while). Feraspe (talk) 10:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Feraspe I think that would be the better order of events. But even without the Archivio Storico Ricordi, the person in question might still be notable, as there are other sources about him – is he maybe one of the five sons of August Wolf (Q27505171) and Emilia Ferrari (Q120864889)? --Emu (talk) 13:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I really don't think so, because in that publication (which was published by Ricordi, by the way) he's called the "ben noto maestro" (well-known maestro), something that would never be the case for an otherwise unknown Emilio Wolf-Ferrari. It's clearly a typo (I don't see any other document quoting such a person). Feraspe (talk) 17:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I see, thanks for your explanation. Yeah, then we should probably  Delete this item once Ricordi revokes the external identifier. --Emu (talk) 17:30, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
He did exist, the Archivio Storico ricordi preserves one of his letters: [4] LutiV (talk) 14:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Johann Schranz (Q21459945): American painter (1794-1882): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unclear meaning. Created for a now retracted Art UK artist ID (P1367) identifier. Maybe originally a bad duplicate of Johann Schranz (Q43136629) but now completely conflated with the description “American painter”. Delete as conflation. --Emu (talk) 19:59, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Getty/ULAN knows three people:
The three may be the same person, Schranz seemingly had a German name, was born in Spain (well, Menorca anyway) and worked in Malta so Italian and English first names seem to fit. No idea where “American” fits in here. But I’m not an expert for the arts. --Emu (talk) 20:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • We should probably keep until the other two Identifiers are withdrawn. My contact at VIAF retired, and there have been no corrections via Wiki since then. Perhaps we should make it an instance of "permanent conflation" until the other Identifiers are withdrawn. --RAN (talk) 14:52, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I remember similar items being deleted because it isn’t a really good idea to keep conflated items just because some other project creates them. --Emu (talk) 11:14, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 9 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Scooby-Doo location (Q111908433): location appearing in the Scooby-Doo universe: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merge with Q3895768 Trade (talk) 20:49, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
We can’t merge because this is clearly a different concept. But I somehow doubt that this item is notable. --Emu (talk) 10:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
how about i switch it's uses out with Q3895768. Would you support deletion then? @Emu: --Trade (talk) 23:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Trade I guess? Those type of items are often problematic, see our discussion at #Q101099318. Might be a good idea to come up with some clarification of WD:N for similar artwork-related “in universe items”. --Emu (talk) 07:08, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
"Those type of items are often problematic" Please elaborate? Unsure what you are refering to Trade (talk) 22:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, for starters they are often under-sourced and thus relying heavily on the structural need clause which is arguably open to interpretation. --Emu (talk) 11:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dunno, they seem to be doing fine with sourcing to me Trade (talk) 15:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Christine Sandler (Q115947559): Former Head of Sales & Digital Marketing - Fidelity Digital Assets: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 23:39, 27 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep Germartin1 (talk) 05:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Any specific reasons to keep this (and Crypto Bahamas 2022 (Q115947158) as well)? --Wolverène (talk) 11:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
She fulfills notability, and the conference was attended by many well-known people such as SBF, Tony Blair and Bill Clinton Germartin1 (talk) 03:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

George Nellist (Q115493671): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 23:41, 27 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep Germartin1 (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Chess (Q114832719): Reversi video game: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A Reversi game named Chess with no sources other than Wikidata derived ones. Matthias M. (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In a way, this is original research: I personally observed that Q114832719 is #18 on Q114810654, that it had no wikidata entry and so I created it. The "source" would be the Q114810654 console itself, which I do understand might not be acceptable enough. But how to act in those cases? I'll be happy to follow whichever guidelines you might point me at in order to avoid this deletion. Mind Booster Noori (talk) 16:36, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Freelance Media (Q121337666): production company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 22:58, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep ACMI ID (P7003) seems to be a serious source. Pxxlhxslxn has pledged on their talk page that their items will be improved upon in the future. --Emu (talk) 09:36, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Daka Hill Kano (Q110753143): A hill in Kano: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 19:27, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

According to the description of the picture on Commons, this is a duplicate of Dalla Hill (Q5211094) --Emu (talk) 12:57, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Do we assume that "Daka" is just a typo then? Or could it also be a spelling variant or an alternative name? --Dorades (talk) 18:47, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, the description of the image reads The children are climbing the Dala hill without any further comment so I would assume a typo. But then again, I have no idea. Ideally, somebody fron Nigeria would weigh in. --Emu (talk) 19:21, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

John Broughton (Q15080841): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Became a conflation between John Broughton (Q121411533): English clergyman and philosopher (1670s-1720) and John Broughton (Q121411387): author of 'Wikipedia: The Missing Manual' some time around 2015. I split the entries, please have another look and then delete. Thank you! --Emu (talk) 14:19, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Support as properly split and otherwise not easily disentangled. Huntster (t @ c) 14:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Network Of Civil Society Organizations Of Nigeria (Q106640882): Non Governmental Organization: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? The organisation is not referred to in the linked article ( Dorades (talk) 19:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:50, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Emma Cots Segú (Q113817212): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Dorades I created this item when I made the cawiki article for Guim Costa i Calsamiglia (Q93071828), her unmarried partner (P451). I disagree with deletion because it will poored Guim Costa infobox article in cawiki. I don't know how much notable she is, but her number of claims are greater than thousands of notable people's spouses or childs have. So, may be someday, an editor starts an article about Emma Cots and upgrade the present information. Thanks Amadalvarez (talk) 21:23, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The number of claims does not really say a lot, can you provide references for them? --Dorades (talk) 21:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'll find references. In any case, I'm not defending her notability, I'm defending the consistency of the information in the database. If someone else item (in this case, Guim Costa) has one information that must be an entity, we must to create it, doesn't matter notability of third person. If you only accept notable people, we only will have in WD notable person married with notable person and with notable childs. It make no sense ! Amadalvarez (talk) 21:31, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, it does not matter what or who I think should have an item in Wikidata, but what the guidelines say. As far as I know, being the wife/husband, child or relative of a notable person usually does not make those notable themselves. According to the guidelines, it's not a problem if there are serious and publicly available references (WD:N). --Dorades (talk) 21:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, the immediate family, especially the spouse, generally is needed to make statements made in other items more useful. Infobox usage is another concern.
However and that’s a reason to  Delete in the current state: The connection is completely unsourced which is very worrying, both because of the constraints of unmarried partner (P451) and because of WD:BLP. All statements about ECS are unsourced too. Amadalvarez you might want to fix this ASAP – if possible. A Google search indicates that this might not be that easy. --Emu (talk) 22:12, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK. I'll look for references. Thanks, Amadalvarez (talk) 22:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Rester jeune (Q115669196): Personalized Rester Jeune program, based on movement, nutrition and well-being after 50.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bulk deletion request: video games owned by Stanford University Libraries[edit]

These entities all represent specific copies of video games held in a research collection at Stanford, not the video games in the abstract. While Historical game collection, circa 1982-2009 (Q61055165) certainly exists and I'm not disputing its notability, the specific objects in that collection aren't individually notable, and having them around makes it more difficult to find entities for the actual games. Omphalographer (talk) 21:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Actual situation of the indigenous population (Q93986663): article published in 1979: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item is a whole journal, not the articles inside that volume and number of the journal. --Romano1920 (talk) 23:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There are two links in the item, the first one is bloken, and the second one shows some article in Spanish (Situación actual de la población indigena). Could you please explain more detailedly? --Wolverène (talk) 09:57, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If the page numbers there are correct (, it seems to be an issue of a journal, not one article. Page numbers are 211-418, so it would include Q121529787 (217-337) Q121529788 (339-369), Q121529789 (371-380), Q121529790 (381-400), Q121529791 (401-418), although there is also Q121529792 (419-423) in the same issue. Peter James (talk) 15:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Q21809313: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted on eswiki and cawiki per notability Brunnaiz (talk) 02:33, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Julfikar Ali Manik (Q121769774): Bangladeshi journalist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N Rockpeterson (talk) 08:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep seems notable to me. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 18:43, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mars Ray (Q121761997): music group: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N Rockpeterson (talk) 08:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fais Umer (Q27244475): Indian film screenwriter: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability --2804:14D:BAA0:93EC:4015:D5E4:EB01:A35D 14:28, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Q11076908: Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q7940934 is for an identical subject and already has most of the same information, except for the Spanish and Catalan wikilinks. I tried merging, but it's too complicated and time-consuming for me to figure out on my own. --Andrew Sheedy (talk) 17:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Andrew Sheedy That would contradict Wikidata:Project chat/Archive/2013/03#Survey_for_generating_rules_regarding_items_with_disambiguation_pages, wouldn’t it? --Emu (talk) 11:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Emu: Sorry, it's not obvious to me how so... Wikidata isn't my thing, so you'll have to excuse my extreme ignorance. Both items I mentioned are for the "Voluntarism" disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. Why wouldn't they be considered the same thing? I initially thought there was no equivalent page on English Wikipedia, until I found it independently. I tried to add an interwiki link and found myself embroiled in Wikidata complexity, which is a bit beyond me and I don't have time to figure out right now. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 19:57, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Andrew Sheedy I’m not an expert either but as a general rule, Wikimedia disambiguation page are only identical in Wikidata if their name are the same character by character, see Wikidata:WikiProject Disambiguation pages/guidelines. --Emu (talk) 21:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Both pages are for "Voluntarism". Both pages list "Volontarisme" as the French equivalent. They're identical, except that one page has translations for Spanish and Catalan, and the other has translations for other languages. So they don't link to each other in Wikipedia, but they are for the exact same thing: "Voluntarism". No difference in spelling whatsoever. One page is called "Voluntarism" and the other just lists "Voluntarism" under the title. Currently, it's impossible to identify the English label at Q11076908, because it's already used at Q7940934, which means neither page can ever be complete. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 08:14, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tristan Simmonds (Q56234897): British comedian: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails the notability criteria. No sitelinks, internal links or references. External IDs are website accounts. --2A02:810B:580:11D4:2F4:6FFF:FE72:D65F 19:45, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Comment I think this is Tristan Simmonds, whose transition has been covered by E! News [5] and Daily Mail [6]. Verified accounts on Instagram and TikTok, the latter with 1.3M followers [7] Jamie7687 (talk) 21:47, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Keep the added references are enough to pass Wikidata notabilty Piecesofuk (talk) 17:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

allstarsinternational (Q121913638): church congregation: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Lymantria (talk) 05:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete Non-notable, promotional, and a mess of bad statements. References are all English Wikipedia (Q328), but I doubt enwiki refers to this church at all. Jamie7687 (talk) 23:05, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep I've found a reference that suggests this passes WD:N
Promotional / bad statement issues should be resolved through fixing the entry Jack4576 (talk) 13:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That page is by its own admission “platform which helps small businesses grow by allowing our members to promote themselves using effective tools and features on the Chamber website”. That’s not a serious source per WD:N. --Emu (talk) 13:22, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Perhaps not. Although I think its arguable. This source doesn't appear to be joke, and appears to be genuine evidence that this subject is an entity per WD:N. In my view it is therefore sufficiently serious.
Additionally, there is this reference to suggest the same:
Do we have additional guidance as to what 'serious' means? Otherwise I'm happy to stick with my intuition as to what the word 'serious' means within the guideline. Jack4576 (talk) 14:16, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think that elaboration of what "serious" means is a potential idea for improvement of WD:N, and it has been discussed on the talk page there. In the absence of such clarification, I agree with @Emu regarding the entry, and also doubt Zaubee as a source establishing notability. Jamie7687 (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In the absence of such clarification I maintain that the ordinary and plain meaning of 'serious' encompasses and includes the sources above, although I acknowledge that reasonable minds may differ. Jack4576 (talk) Jack4576 (talk) 10:24, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree with Emu that the link does not imply notability. So I still stand with my request. --Lymantria (talk) 11:47, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Myriad Sun (Q119044055): Music band formed in Perth, Western Australia: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 11:32, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep per WD:N #2
Subject identifiable as an independent entity within the RTRFM reference present on the page
Specifically, the subject are identifiable as a band on the event poster on the page
RTRFM is a serious and publicly accessible source of information
The nominator makes a serious error
(this is Jack4576 on an IP edit) 11:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: I have now added this additional source, from ABC News: Jack4576 (talk) 12:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note #2: I have now added this additional source, from the music review magazine Tonedeaf Jack4576 (talk) 12:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note #3: I have now added this additional source, a music review in XPRESS mag: Jack4576 (talk) 12:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

radical feminist (Q122067061): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No use, created as pure POV --Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 12:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:20, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
By the same POV-user, that invented is for that purpose. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 12:27, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete: I agree, the creator seems a POV-user, original research, owner-like behavior. Just uses this item to label living people: ¿sabotage? I apologize, I just opened the same request some hours later. PedroAcero76 (talk) 00:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No sources, no notability, no sense since there is an entry for radical feminism. POV-purpose item, just take a look to the latest edits on Feminazi and "radical feminism" itself by the creator/self-proclaimed owner of this item. ¿Possible sabotage? I think he/she deserves a warning by an administrator, since Wikidata should not be any POV warrior's battlefield. --PedroAcero76 (talk) 22:52, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep: Radical feminism is different in concept to a particular person being a 'radical feminist'. I disagree that this is amounts to problematic POV warrior-ing. The lack of sources however is an issue, although this is such a manifestly obvious subject/entity that I'm comfortable keeping it in this case. Jack4576 (talk) 00:28, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, it's a pure POV-pushing invention of one user, with complete and utter nonsensicl edits to it. To include a only derogatory rightwing smearword (Feminazi has no real world meaning besides bullying the non-manosphere by the toxic manospherists) as part of its definition says it all imho. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 09:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
To say that word has no meaning IMO is quite revealing. I respectfully disagree. Jack4576 (talk) 19:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, it has a "meaning", and if someone uses it, it's quite revealing. It's an ideological swearword for any women opposing misogynists. It's just nothing besides being an ideological swearword. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 19:48, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Stephen Yao Mawunyo (Q112289782): Ghanaian actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:29, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete: lack of references Jack4576 (talk) 00:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
According to [8], he was interviewed on the w:en:The Delay Show. That could be a sign of notability. --Emu (talk) 09:52, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Indeed, I change my vote to  Keep on that basis. Thank you User:Emu. Jack4576 (talk) 20:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ryan Engh Jr. (Q106428229): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears non-notable and promotional Jamie7687 (talk) 18:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Info previously kept by @Ameisenigel at Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2022/02/19#Bulk_deletion_request. Articles do seem to be paid-for though. --Emu (talk) 20:58, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply] (Q120197814): Italian online herbal store and thematic portal for health, beauty and wellness.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears non-notable and promotional Jamie7687 (talk) 20:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This item is notable as reference for another item: it's an archive of the educational content produced by its author, one of the most known italian herbalist and phytotherapy educators, Dr.ssa Marina Multineddu (, in fact the website has been awarded for this, as you can see in the item page.
If the description appears promotional, I can modify it. Kaisersouse72Gmail (talk) 08:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Okay, I think I see that it was 2nd place for one subcategory in that ranking. I could be missing something. I'm not sure if that is enough to establish notability. Regarding descriptions, see Help:Description; a main idea is that they should be short, e.g. "online herbal store" for this item's English description. Jamie7687 (talk) 16:39, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok, I modified the description as requested.
It won that award for 2 years in its category, so it's considered the 2nd italian best website for its main topic, I think it's enough to be notable. Kaisersouse72Gmail (talk) 18:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Renel Kiriakos (Q122208720): actor and singer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability; just a self-promotional registration. ——Chalk19 (talk) 04:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete not notable, promotion only account. Even tried to write a promotional article in a user page edit summary; can that be deleted too? Jamie7687 (talk) 04:57, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hidden. What's for the item - the subject may be notable if she really played in two episodes of I zoi tis allis (Q16332572) (WD:N criterion 3). --Wolverène (talk) 05:38, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's thin, but I was able to find some identifiers and sources. Bovlb (talk) 17:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Delete that emonthlynews source looks spam and a paid article (see: [9][10]), other two are obviously not things to add a value (one is a personal profile, other is one of those user contributed sites which is abused heavily by these pr guys)
About the "I zoi tis allis" argument, it may be true that she played in two episodes of that series but I don't think playing a most likely uncredited a few seconds background role in a daily soap opera really makes a difference. She's not listed among characters or actors in the Greek Wikipedia page of the show. I was even unable to verify a background role as well, I'm unable to see an "Ice Skater" on this episode for example: Tehonk (talk) 22:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Terraria mod (Q122219012): modification for the video game Terraria: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Redundant. Use video game mod (Q865493) instead Trade (talk) 02:36, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have no particular opinion on this - I saw that items for Minecraft mods were using instance of Minecraft mod (Q111369260) so I did the same for Terraria mods. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 10:25, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Tomodachi94 (talk) -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 02:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC) SWinxy (talk) 17:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC) BEANS X2 (talk) Serilly (talk) Notified participants of WikiProject Minecraft as this is within their scope. —Tomodachi94 (he/him · talk) 02:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Apologies, this was the wrong RFD. —Tomodachi94 (he/him · talk) 02:16, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Minecraft mod (Q111369260): modification for the video game Minecraft: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Redundant. Use video game mod Q865493 instead Trade (talk) 14:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Question: Trade how will we relate it to Minecraft modding (Q22906953)? Minecraft mod has the facet of (P1269) set to Minecraft modding (Q22906953), but replacing it with video game mod (Q865493) seems to mean sacrificing that link (please ping on reply). SWinxy (talk) 03:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Comment None of this matters if the item is deleted @SWinxy:--Trade (talk) 15:03, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes it does, because there aught to be a link to Minecraft modding (Q22906953), no? SWinxy (talk) 15:08, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Erisa Beygi (Q112823426): Iranian actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability --HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:48, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:50, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Franck Kayombo (Q122228268): Congolese entrepreneur, digital communication specialist and wikimedian DRC: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 22:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Eva Mpitha (Q120790610): Greek journalist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 10:26, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ink Blot Media Group (Q122050488): company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Fralambert (talk) 23:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Action Aid Nigeria (Q106591492): A non-governmental organization to Help Nigerians Defeat Poverty: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 12:41, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Comment added a reference, not sure it make this item more notable. Fralambert (talk) 19:40, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding African Development Foundation[edit]

  1. Q106584358 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q106591744 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 12:44, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Merge with Q4689748 Jack4576 (talk) 07:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No, this is not the same --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Developing Effective Private Education Nigeria (DEEPEN) (Q109049632): A non-governmental organization for improving Education in Nigeria: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 13:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep Seem notable [11], [12]. Fralambert (talk) 20:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Child Aid, Community-Care & Development Intiative (Q109104611): A Non-governmental organization for Eradication of poverty in Nigeria: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep seem notable [13] . Fralambert (talk) 20:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

5by5 at the Movies (Q99767525): Podcast: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 20:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Back to Work (Q99767527): Podcast: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 20:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perspica (Q48675114): San Jose based information technology based company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 12:11, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Joseph Rocha[edit]

  1. Q114861113 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q114785426 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 12:57, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep He's the creator/producer/presenter of Cala-A-Boca (Q114785426). I created the items for him and the other two presenters to add depth to the data for that podcast. I didn't think there would be a question of legitimacy since it was in consistent production for many years and I'd seen the same done for podcasts with barely a couple dozen episodes. Was that a poor conclusion to draw on my part? 🐈⚞ogueScholar⚟🗨₨UserTalk 22:54, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I could not see that these two items demonstrated notability in the Wikidata sense – maybe you could add references or identifiers from serious sources to dispel doubts about notability? --Dorades (talk) 18:46, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Stephens, Thomas Blackett (Q56722577): article in 1892 ed. of The Dictionary of Australasian Biography: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted at source  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Q106986482 is the same article. The different page number is because Q56722577 uses the page number in the file; Q106986482 uses the page number from the Dictionary of Australasian Biography. Peter James (talk) 15:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That seems a reason to merge, not to delete.--Pere prlpz (talk) 13:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Minecraft modder (Q117461124): person who authors Minecraft mods: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merge with Q107636670 Trade (talk) 15:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, we just can use occupation = modder, with field of work (P101) = Minecraft (Q49740). Nothing makes MC modders more special comparing to those who are modding The Sims/GTA/Assassin's Creed/etc. --Wolverène (talk) 06:27, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sonia Cassiani (Q119430605): Italian social media manager: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 20:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:00, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ali Asgari Lemjiri (Q112654388): Aircraft pilot: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Lymantria (talk) 05:26, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Caleb Denecour (Q98726781): American ultimate player and social media manager: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 21:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just added his IMDb and a link to his AUDL profile. He was a semi-regular member of the cast of Achievement Hunter and Rooster Teeth for many years, and he also played three seasons in the AUDL. Seems like enough to have an item. IagoQnsi (talk) 23:12, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

NewDeez (Q122803120): Marketing agency company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 14:01, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How do i improve the item to be notable? Daremize (talk) 18:23, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Daremize Like all wikis, add sources from reliable and independant medias. Fralambert (talk) 02:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
i added some url but seems they are not reliable enough and also i don't know company item has a notability they need to fulfill. i will work on it tho Daremize (talk) 10:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Delete All sources I could find are self publications, press releases, or slightly rewritten press releases. -- William Graham (talk) 15:32, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
what of the forbes article? if it's not enough, you can help improving it Daremize (talk) 12:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The Forbes Mexico article has a note at the end that it is sponsored content. To me that's not a serious source. -- William Graham (talk) 16:49, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
These are all the article URL i can find for the entity and i don't know if there is any reliable source among them, you can check them out Daremize (talk) 12:12, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I don't have the time to read every link in an indiscriminate list, but from looking at a handful they look like sponsored content/paid advertisements. -- William Graham (talk) 15:58, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
oops i see
i think checking an item and reviewing all the info and content related to the item is the normal procedure before concluding that the item is not notable and requesting it for deletion, isn't?
Also, how will you arrive at the conclusion of notability if you didn't review an item properly?
i may be wrong tho, hoping to learn more Daremize (talk) 14:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Delete Spam Tehonk (talk) 05:36, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
how is the item spam because spam is creating a item repeatedly after be deleted. so i don't get how it is spam Daremize (talk) 05:46, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's spam because you're trying to cross-wiki spam it, you're even banned in Commons. All the links are just promo, pr, paid pieces. Tehonk (talk) 06:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Argyro Aggelopoulou (Q122830180): Greek actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable - no sitelinks or structural need —Tom Morris (talk) 11:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep She seem to have written books. [14] Fralambert (talk) 12:43, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

class that shouldn't be used as class (Q104093226): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Unused Swpb (talk) 16:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Did you remove it's uses? ChristianKl❫ 08:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Is there a way to check where was it used? An example of where it could be used would settle de proposal.--Pere prlpz (talk) 13:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yehia Waleed (Q120907667): Video Game Developer / Publisher: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Madamebiblio (talk) 02:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:30, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bulk deletion request “Braehart”[edit]

spam Gymnicus (talk) 14:54, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is the article covering the same party as Q117192856. In the German, French, English and Polish Wikipedias (others too probably) the article had already been moved under the new lemma, so I relocated the remaining wikilinks to the current record. Bogorm (talk) 09:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:10, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If they are actually the same party, both items should be merged, not deleted. However, I wonder wheter just the name changed or if they can be seen as different entities - but I'm not familiar with Slovak political parties.--Pere prlpz (talk) 13:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Origan (Q122830595): male given name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Bogus item by known vandal Gikü (talk) 20:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just in theory, this male given name exists. --Wolverène (talk) 11:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Shaahin Cheyene (Q7459914): American businessman and filmmaker: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability --HeminKurdistan (talk) 09:35, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Keep As structural need for his movie Serpent and the Sun:Tales of an Aztec Apprentice (Q7455102), who seem notable. Fralambert (talk) 11:47, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jack Henderson (Q122931853): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Madamebiblio (talk) 14:04, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:11, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In my view, It meets WD:N#3, i's providing structural support for Extension:Livelets (Q21677339). P858snake (talk) 19:13, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lumens Dental Corp. (Q115652529): Software Company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Fralambert (talk) 22:57, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Kyero[edit]

  1. Q121996071 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q122013791 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q122020215 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q122010973 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q122011110 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q122010306 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q122010527 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q122009866 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q122010075 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q122008503 (delete | history | links | logs)
  11. Q122008918 (delete | history | links | logs)
  12. Q122009426 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 16:17, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding NavInfo[edit]

  1. Q121493819 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q121494216 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q121494118 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 16:33, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Q10353103: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N. Last sitelink deleted and all the references comes from there. Kacamata (talk) 23:01, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep seem to be a notable beach [15], [16]. Fralambert (talk) 00:41, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Natu.Care[edit]

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 16:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Golden Recursion Inc. (Q71017011): owner of Golden knowledge base: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 16:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Q122950623: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It seems to fail WD:N. Kacamata (talk) 00:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I learned a lot from this subject Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion, before creating this page for a Public School in Angola. And according to the article itself, I made sure to include strong sources, from newspapers of unquestionable reputation in Angola and Portugal. The article in the link partly says the following to prove that the article has enough references to remain on wikidata.
1. Having both strong identifiers and strong references. (O jornal de Angola, Rádio Nacional de Angola, RTP Portugal Expresso Jornal de Portugal, I believe they are strong references and they are all attached)
2. Having a useful in-link from another item that has unquestionable notability.
3. Coverage in a major newspaper or magazine is generally strong, but only where there is substantial content about the entity and they are not, say, just an interviewee.
Note: It is a school that dates back to the colonial era of Angola, which was under the empire of Portugal, and the first name was given by the Empire of Portugal in 1960 according to the references
Thanks Nelson Capitia (talk) 14:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

D>E>A>T>H>M>E>T>A>L (Q122967230): 2020 compilation album by Panchiko: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty Trade (talk) 17:58, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Comment Why has this item been made empty? I understand the creation of the new 'release' items, but why null out this release group? OmegaFallon (talk) 18:51, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I just made it a redirect to the new one, that seems easier. OmegaFallon (talk) 21:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I am still new to the whole album release/release group thing Trade (talk) 19:34, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Coding Academy Paris (Q114900750): private institution of higher education in computer science: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Same as Q27906603 which is the good one --2A01:CB00:D00:E900:E963:7289:E3BB:CBFA 12:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Stian Giskeødegård (Q59780827): Marketing person from Norway: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by me by mistake 1Veertje (talk) 11:18, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Comment Has a non-empty Commons category and was created nearly five years ago. Bovlb (talk) 16:28, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

House of Orange-Nassau-Vollenhoven (Q115212042): Cadet Branch of the House of Orange-Nassau: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Nonsense; see c:Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/09/Category:House of Orange-Nassau-Vollenhoven --JopkeB (talk) 12:24, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Should I remove those links? JopkeB (talk) 14:40, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@JopkeB In general no. You should not blank or disconnect items in anticipation of deletion. Removing links to an items makes it harder for us to assess it and causes problems if we do decide to keep it. If we decide to delete despite links, they will be tidied up later. An exception to this is if you have a better item to change those links to. Bovlb (talk) 16:25, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks! JopkeB (talk) 01:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bulk deletion request of Leave It to Beaver items[edit]

  1. Q117689016 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q117687410 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q117690660 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q117697612 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q117705099 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable fictional location and single episode of Leave It to Beaver. William Graham (talk) 22:56, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Rikke Brewer (Q115645656): British traceur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 07:11, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Longdendale (Q24640814): human settlement in the United Kingdom: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no settlement with this name, only a valley at Longdendale (Q11762529). Lucywood (talk) 09:49, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • It several identifiers that probably belong somewhere - possibly the unparished area (currently the same item as the valley) or the urban district that existed 1936-1974. Peter James (talk) 18:19, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:History of Monterey, California (Q116272394): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Commons-only category Quesotiotyo (talk) 18:58, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You did not explain why you want this category deleted. Please explain?
This is for the History of Monterey, California (Q116272394), which has is tied to Category:History of Monterey, California. The category has 48 files associated with it. Greghenderson2006 (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Greghenderson2006 This not not about the number of files, but more WD:N as stated by . Commons categories are not notable alone as stated in #1.4, to be notable, it have to fulfill a other criteria. Fralambert (talk) 20:52, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I do not want this category deleted. It is simply a subcategory under Category:Monterey, California to help place images related to the history of monterey, much like the Category:History of Carmel, California, Category:History of San Francisco, etc. Greghenderson2006 (talk) 22:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)