User talk:ChristianKl

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:ChristianKl/Structured Discussions Archive 1 on 2023-11-30.

Logo of Wikidata

Welcome to Wikidata, ChristianKl!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

  • Introduction – An introduction to the project.
  • Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
  • Community portal – The portal for community members.
  • User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
  • Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
  • Project chat – Discussions about the project.
  • Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:46, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have removed the constraints from this property. So, now we have no error reports for this. This is probably not such a good idea. Danrok (talk) 00:45, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I removed them after having a discussion at the project chat about widening the scope so that the property can be used with any physical entity that connects to another physical entity. That means that the old constraints aren't relevant anymore. How do you think the new constraint should look like? ChristianKl (talk) 07:09, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Property proposals


Hi ChristianKl. Today I found a few old property proposals that weren't transcluded in one of the pages at Wikidata:Property proposal, including several of yours (e.g. Wikidata:Property proposal/what3words address). It's unlikely people will comment on them if they are not transcluded. You might want to double check these and withdraw the ones that are no longer needed. --- Jura 08:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I think I made them before fully understanding how the process works. ChristianKl (talk) 09:25, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
NP. In the meantime, the template attempts to generate an error message if the proposal isn't transcluded.
--- Jura 09:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in the WQT UI requirements elicitation online workshop


Dear ChristianKl,

I hope you are doing well,

We are a group of researchers from King’s College London working on developing WQT (Wikidata Quality Toolkit), which will support a diverse set of editors in curating and validating Wikidata content.

We are inviting you to participate in an online workshop aimed at understanding the requirements for designing effective and easy-to-use user interfaces (UI) for three tools within WQT that can support the daily activities of Wikidata editors: recommending items to edit based on their personal preferences, finding items that need better references, and generating entity schemas automatically for better item quality.

The main activity during this workshop will be UI mockup sketching. To facilitate this, we encourage you to attend the workshop using a tablet or laptop with PowerPoint installed or any other drawing tools you prefer. This will allow for a more interactive and productive session as we delve into the UI mockup sketching activities.

Participation is completely voluntary. You should only take part if you want to and choosing not to take part will not disadvantage you in any way. However, your cooperation will be valuable for the WQT design. Please note that all data and responses collected during the workshop will be used solely for the purpose of improving the WQT and understanding editor requirements. We will analyze the results in an anonymized form, ensuring your privacy is protected. Personal information will be kept confidential and will be deleted once it has served its purpose in this research.

The online workshop, which will be held on April 5th, should take no more than 3 hours.

If you agree to participate in this workshop, please either contact me at or use this form to register your interest Then, I will contact you with all the instructions for the workshop.

For more information about my project, please read this page:

If you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me at the email address mentioned above.

Thank you for considering taking part in this project.

Regards Kholoudsaa (talk) 03:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New property for deletion


Hello, I wanted to inform you that I've just nominated for deletion the property:P3717 that you created.

P.S. I'm contacting you here because in the top banner you're not providing any link for the "current talk page". Horcrux (talk) 11:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Film Museum (Q1922726)



I'm sorry, I don't speak German or English (I use an automatic translation tool). You have blocked this version:

However, my modification was not "vandalism". I have explained it several times on the discussion page here:

Consequently, I do not understand your intervention. Do you have an explanation?

Thanks in advance 11:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't make a judgement on the content. Edit-warring is not a way to solve disputes, so I see no need for you to edit the page directly. If you want to discuss with another editor on the page, it makes sense to ping them so that they see the message.
Registering an account is also generally helpful when it comes to have debates about content. ChristianKl11:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was your friend who introduced the error and repeats it every time I correct it.
The problem is that you are polluting the French version with text that is not correct, whether in its meaning or its respect for the French language. -- 14:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover " l'ancien musée du cinéma de Bruxelles fusionne avec CINEMATEK" in French it doesn't mean anything! The Cinematheque established the Cinema Museum in 1962. In 2009, the Cinematheque decided to use the brand "Cinematek", but there was no change.

Possible mistake?


I think when you wrote "The main reason against it being used as a qualifier" here, you may have mean to say "The main reason against it being used as a main statement property", or equivalently, "The main reason for it being used solely as a qualifier". Cheers. Swpb (talk) 13:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks I corrected it. ChristianKl09:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]