User talk:Jklamo

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

city with millions of inhabitants[edit]

Why is this getting removed? - Bossanoven (talk) 19:16, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

As we already have population (P1082). See Wikidata:Project_chat#Item for cities. --Jklamo (talk) 19:20, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Please be careful when removing this assertion. It was removed from Kolkata (Q1348) which had no other instance statement. - Njohnson7 (talk) 17:28, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

multi-billion dollar company (Q55221379)[edit]

Thank you for removing the "instance-of billionaire" claims from the ~26 instances of large organizations. I would have done so directly myself, rather than creating the questionable Q55221379 item, were it not for the fact that the editor who originally asserted the erroneous "billionaire" claim back on June 16th has a reputation for being rather prickly, and the Q55221379 replacement claim was my way of forestalling a time-consuming edit war. Billdesmedt (talk) 17:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

World heritage site Prague[edit]

Hi Jklamo,

you reverted my removal of the "world heritage site id property" from the Prague article. I know that it might have looked like vandalism. However, there's a unique constraint on that property P757, so each WHS id can only be used with one entity. That entity should be Historic Centre of Prague (Q11335521). UNESCO has declared only part of Prague as a world heritage site, therefore the entity for the entire city Q1085 is not the right one for that property.

-- 11:42, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for clarification. But still there are more WHS related statements at Prague (Q1085) that needs to be moved to Historic Centre of Prague (Q11335521). I am also considering how to connect Prague (Q1085) with Historic Centre of Prague (Q11335521).--Jklamo (talk) 12:56, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
You're right, I should have removed those as well. I'm trying to get the list of all "main" world heritage sites (so no WHS locations with a dash "-" in the ID) down to the correct number of 1092. Right now it's at 1118 because of duplicates. Unfortunately, there are quite a few cases left where I find it hard to decide on how to merge them.-- 17:20, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
I appreciate your effort. For a "duplicates" I think in most cases it is not a good idea to merge them, but rather keep ID only at the appropriate item, remove it from second and connect them (as it was done for Prague (Q1085) and Historic Centre of Prague (Q11335521)). Wikidata have larger granularity than other WMF projects (like Wikipedia), so there is the place to record everything properly and not confuse two similar concepts in one item.--Jklamo (talk) 17:55, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

ČEPS a.s. split[edit]

Hi, what's the difference between ČEPS (Q11089927) and CEPS (Q54957184) in reality? Could the items be linked to each other, or merged? --Te750iv (talk) 10:07, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi, these are two different unrelated companies. But industry (P452) claim at CEPS (Q54957184) is wrong, you can delete it. Also, you can "connect" both items using different from (P1889). Unfortunately, I am unable to edit items right now.--Jklamo (talk) 14:09, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
done. At CEPS (Q54957184), I also replaced some references to, the ČEPS website. When you have time again, you could check [1] and see if further improvements are possible. Thanks. --Te750iv (talk) 01:10, 7 August 2018 (UTC)