User talk:Hasley

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Statistics
Action Count
Edits
11,584
Pages deleted
5,191
Pages protected
117
Protections modified
0
Users blocked
467
Users reblocked
12
User rights modified
1

User talk:Hasley

This is Hasley's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Hasley.

  • Use the "Add topic" button (located in the upper right hand corner) to begin a new discussion, or reply to one listed below.
  • If you leave a message here, expect here an answer.
  • If you are going to reply to a message from this user, please reply on your talk page.
  • Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
  • If you require help from an administrator, please leave a message at the administrators' noticeboard — you will likely get a faster response.
  • If you have any questions, feel free to ask me here. Or, you can leave a message at the Wikidata project chat.

Vandalism[edit]

Hello! Vandal having fun here. Please block and hide his creations 46.211.80.83 (talkcontribslogs) --Mykola7 (talk) 23:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done. —Hasley+ 23:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you very much!) --Mykola7 (talk) 23:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

حذف اشتباه[edit]

سلام، صفحه من بی دلیل حذف شده است، یا من دلیل حذف را نمی دانم، من خراب کار نیستم، لطفا من را فعال کنید، سپاس Sadeqmokhtari (talk) 11:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please activate my page, I'm not broken Sadeqmokhtari (talk) 11:42, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

user complain[edit]

hi, I don't know where to report users on Wikidata. I request you to hide the abusive change in the following revision and block the user. https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q55695988&diff=prev&oldid=1422978528 Dicayes (talk) 16:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User has not edited in several days, though I revdeleted that obscenity. Next time, you can report vandals at WD:AN. Best, —Hasley+ 16:39, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
thanks, good work!Dicayes (talk) 16:52, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Restore my page please Onesmatic (talk) 23:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WikiSP Newsletter #1 (2021-06)[edit]

02:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Range block is needed[edit]

Hi. This kid (IP 37.130.100.117) will not stop. Thanx. --E4024 (talk) 15:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have blocked the range 37.130.100.0/24 for a month. Thanks for letting me know. —Hasley+ 16:01, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Many thanks. Now aka 37.130.120.155 --E4024 (talk) 14:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done. —Hasley+ 14:38, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Now 37.130.122.136 and God knows what other IPs... --E4024 (talk) 14:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Done. —Hasley+ 14:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Protection needed[edit]

For Mesut Özil (Q83488), there is another vandal there. --E4024 (talk) 14:33, 7 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done, 6 months. —Hasley+ 14:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please have a look[edit]

At User talk:193.146.93.29 and their edits. thx. --E4024 (talk) 15:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Blocked for another year. —Hasley+ 15:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Vandalism and hate speech[edit]

User:Orhan kaymak diyarbakır

Thx. --E4024 (talk) 00:55, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done. —Hasley+ 10:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

LTA[edit]

37.130.121.142 Thx. --E4024 (talk) 02:37, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done. —Hasley+ 11:43, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Appeared again at Gözde Kansu (Q6086624). --E4024 (talk) 13:10, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done /24 for three months. —Hasley+ 13:30, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FYI[edit]

Just to keep an eye, prophet in a cell. --E4024 (talk) 02:07, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi[edit]

The IP 213.167.198.24 has made so many changes on an item I follow, I have a difficulty in patrolling them. Can you have a look please? Thanks in advance. --E4024 (talk) 14:19, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. It seems to be related to Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive/2021/06#Report concerning User:31.28.204.17; I have blocked them for three days for now. —Hasley+ 14:37, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Vandal of the day[edit]

Hi there. Redlink user Egeutku0, stopped now, but if he sees that vandalism is tolerated he may continue. Please give him a short warning block. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 19:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, thanks for your report. Usually, vandal accounts will not get blocked if they stop editing after being warned. If they edit again, then a block is needed to prevent further disruption. I will be watching this. —Hasley+ 20:46, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Justo la respuesta que esperaba de Vd; parece que es un buen admin. :) --E4024 (talk) 21:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Gracias, y muy buen español tiene Face-smile.svg. —Hasley+ 22:22, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hola[edit]

Qué tal? Cree que algun bibliotecario debe congelar Q106715007 en algun momento para que las partes discutan con cabeza fresca en vez de seguir tirando y empujando? A mí aquello me es un tema que ni había oído antes, pero molesta ver tanto ir y venir sobre una tontería... No? --E4024 (talk) 01:45, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@E4024 I emailed James himself yesterday about the item and from his response it sounds like he's contacted Wikimedia Privacy regarding certain statements, particularly the unsourced date of birth and place of birth statements. So from that correspondence I hope something will be done to Q106715007 soon.
(es) Ayer le envié un correo electrónico al propio James sobre el artículo y, por su respuesta, parece que se ha puesto en contacto con Wikimedia Privacy con respecto a ciertas declaraciones, en particular las declaraciones de fecha de nacimiento y lugar de nacimiento sin fuente. Entonces, a partir de esa correspondencia, espero que pronto se haga algo con Q106715007. Sputnik12 (talk) 10:56, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hola, gracias por contactar conmigo. El lugar idóneo para discutir esto es el tablón de administradores. Estoy al tanto del caso, pero preferiría no intervenir, pues, primeramente, estoy involucrado al haber borrado su enlace de sitio en otro wiki, y también tengo mis dudas sobre la relevancia del personaje, por lo que estoy considerando proponer el borrado del elemento y de la propiedad P9395 (P9395), así como también de su respectivo ítem. —Hasley+ 13:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
P. D.: el elemento ya está semiprotegido. —Hasley+ 14:33, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Gracias por las respuestas. Como ya he dicho el tema de ese joven como tal no me interesa y por eso tampoco tenía idea de las cosas que Hasley acaba de compartir. Francamente estoy muy convencid@ que tenemos que separar las aguas entre diferencias de opinión (aunque se presenten en forma de una competición o pelea de cambios) y lo que es vandalismo. Recientemente estuve de visita en el tablón de administradores. Me ha molestado muchísimo aunque nadie ni siquiera opinó algo. Si no sabemos usar Project chat o añoramos tener otra plataforma para discutir diferencias de opinión sobre contenido, hagamos un "tablón de administradores contra el vandalismo" donde se pueden discutir contribuciones consideradas vandalismo por el/la proponente. Pienso que diferencias de opinión no es un tema de administración. Los administradores -o bibliotecarios como me gusta más- tienen que discutir esos temas en igualdad de condiciones con el resto y no con un botón nuclear en la manga. Hagamos el "tablón de administradores contra el vandalismo" y si alguién trae un tema de diferencias de opinión a dicho tablón, que el administrador que lo vea lo traslade a la página "project chat" o alguna nueva plataforma por este tipo de (non-vandal) conflictos. Saludos cordiales. --E4024 (talk) 14:43, 2 July 2021 (UTC) P.S. Yo no quise decir a Hasley que use los botones nucleares cuando escribí mi mensaje inicial; solo quise decir "proteger" la página para que ésta quedara estable mientrás la discusión se realizara en otra parte.Reply[reply]

Same kid?[edit]

Please see: User contributions for 95.173.248.15 Thx. --E4024 (talk) 15:12, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Blocked for one week. —Hasley+ 15:49, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Non-admin help request[edit]

Hi. Asiye Nurten (Q101232142) is co-author of a series of academic articles we have got. I want to create the necessary links between the items of the author(s) of these articles with the items of the relative texts, such as Scopolamine-induced convulsions in food given fasted mice: effects of physostigmine and MK-801. (Q42548060). Can you show me how to do that? (I guess for texts written by several people we need to have a "co-author" thingy, but we do not.)

OTOH, all these academic article items are made by bots and of course they cannot decipher the exact names of the co-authors, as in this case, because the text just says "Nurten A" instead of "Asiye Nurten". Also, the bot (why?) adds a full stop dot at the end of article names, which seems wrong to me. Is it not?

Thanks in advance for your possible help. --E4024 (talk) 20:07, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. There are two types of author properties. These are author (P50) (used when the item for the author exists) and author name string (P2093) (used when the item does not exist). I did a search for the authors using Author Disambiguator (Nurhan Enginar, Asiye Nurten, Pınar Yamantürk, and Hikmet Koyuncuoǧlu), and only two have items—Nurhan Enginar (Q17046216) and Asiye Nurten (Q101232142). Both properties can be used, keeping the same series ordinal (P1545) to denote order; see for example Q21521425.
Regarding your last question, I am not really sure, but suspect that it was a bot error. Hope it helps.
Best, —Hasley+ 22:24, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hasley, amig@, many thanks. From what you say I understand we have to have items of all the authors to do what I want to do. I already made Pınar Yamantürk (Q107449659), the item of her surname, and developed the items of people with that surname etc. I think Wikidata should pay me, at least the gafas/lentes! (Since I began surfing in the WM universe, trying to write everything with two fingers, I think I have both of them shorter and fatter than the others... :) Best. --E4024 (talk) 23:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WikiSP Newsletter #2 (2021-06)[edit]

16:10, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Category:Airlines established in 2021 (Q107465995)[edit]

Hola. Although I am autoconfirmed, when I try to develop Category:Airlines established in 2021 (Q107465995) I am stopped by the system from using what was wrongly in the "definition" as "label", and I had to use the letter "i" instead of the preposition "in" to surpass the problem. It takes time for my edits to become "accepted, confirmed", something strange after so many contributions... Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 15:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The label cannot be the same as the description (and vice versa), as in the previous revision of the item; removing the wrong value should fix it. Best, —Hasley+ 16:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No me está diciendo nada que yo no sepa; lo que pasa es que para el sistema yo no soy tan confiable como Vd, que sea así... --E4024 (talk) 17:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WikiSP Newsletter #3 (2021-08)[edit]

20:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

LTA[edit]

Hi Hasley, I just noticed that you blocked Special:Contributions/2001:8004:C82:D673:F1D4:97DB:9AA5:890B. It's an LTA vandal from New South Wales who keeps us busy for many months. In sum it took me some hours cleaning up their crap on Commons and here as well. Just FYI: Today I was fed up once again and blocked all of their IP ranges for 6 months: Special:Contributions/2001:8003:2000::/36, Special:Contributions/2001:8003:365a:7500::/64, Special:Contributions/2001:8004::/32, and Special:Contributions/101.190.0.0/17. The last one had collateral damage here on wikidata, where they used Special:Contributions/101.190.73.162 only. I tried to collect their IPs but I've given up now. Regards, Achim (talk) 21:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Achim, thank you for the notice. I have blocked both of the 2001:8003:2000::/36 and 2001:8003:365a:7500::/64 ranges for three months (the third one is already blocked [/33]), and added a ton of items to my watchlist. I will monitor them over the next few months to see what happens. Best, —Hasley+ 21:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

LTA vandal[edit]

Hi. This kid began again... Thx. --E4024 (talk) 14:31, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done. —Hasley+ 15:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please delete[edit]

Q108679676. --E4024 (talk) 13:07, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted. —Hasley+ 13:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there[edit]

Hola hola. Please give me a hand to make visible -or whatever needed- at Wikidata:Property proposal/TMOK ID. Muchas gracias de antemano. --E4024 (talk) 01:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Transcluded. Please address the concerns brought up in the discussion section. I do not work with property proposals, so there is not much I can do. Best, —Hasley+ 02:35, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pink note[edit]

Hi. Would it not be appropriate to add here another pink note? Thx. --E4024 (talk) 02:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Also have a look at User talk:User318373 please. Thx. --E4024 (talk) 02:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I have blocked the IP address for 6 months. The account was warned, and has been inactive since then; if they edit again, they will get blocked. Best, —Hasley+ 13:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thank you very much. Please also do something about the IP 37.130.120.233... Thanks in advance. --E4024 (talk) 14:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Done. —Hasley+ 14:34, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

LTA or LTAs[edit]

User contributions for 37.130.121.29 Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 18:43, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done. —Hasley+ 18:46, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Known vandal back again. Please see User contributions for 82.222.11.63. Thx. --E4024 (talk) 18:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done. —Hasley+ 18:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sabiha Sertel (Q1396133)[edit]

Sabiha Sertel (Q1396133) was born Sabiha Nazmi and with marriage became Sabiha Zekeriya. Later -with the Surname Law- Sabiha Sertel. ES:WP makes a mistake in her previous names such as "Sabiha Nazmi Zekeriya Sertel" (sic) and a bot adds that invented name to her item here. I am not sure why I care for that version of WP (maybe I only care for "knowledge") and I guess you are active there. Maybe you can do something to prevent the bot from doing this again. Gracias. --E4024 (talk) 23:54, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I do not know how the bot works. I did some clean-up of this page, and removed “Sabiha Nazmi Zekeriya Serte” as there are no reliable sources that confirm that. Hope it helps. Best, —Hasley+ 03:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WikiSP Newsletter #04[edit]

03:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Un vándalo encontrado...[edit]

...aquí. Hola, Hasley. Te agradecería si fueras tan amable de bloquear esta CCV, por favor. No ha vuelto a editar, pero ya sabes, por si las moscas, o tú me dices. Un saludo. csq dime... 17:45, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hola, 88 csq. A efectos prácticos, aplicar sanciones a cuentas que tienen bastante tiempo sin editar no tiene mayor utilidad. Por lo demás, lo he puesto en seguimiento; creo que es suficiente con dejarlo así, aunque dudo que vuelva a vandalizar. Saludos, —Hasley+ 21:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WikiSP Newsletter #05 (2021-11)[edit]

00:48, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Condecoración de la 1º entrega de los Premios Allie[edit]

Wikisp-logo-icon-white.svg

Allie Adamas

Los individuos extraordinarios son aquellos voluntarios que durante mucho tiempo han contribuido a mejorar la comunidad pese a sus dificultades. El aprecio de distintos voluntarios dirigido hacia ellos es muestra suficiente de que su labor, sin retribución, es bien agradecida. Este trofeo es para ustedes.

Academia de los Premios Allie
14:29, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

WikiSP-Allie-Adamas-Trophy.png

You deleted my page[edit]

Hello @hasley I beg you kindly to restore my page that was deleted in a few minutes back.... Please help me out my sister Onesmatic (talk) 23:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What was your page about? Was it within the notability guidelines? If it was about yourself or someone with whom you are closely associated, then it probably is not notable. Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 00:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please avoid editing or creating items about yourself; this is usually frowned upon and can be considered spamming. Anyway, that page was clearly outside of Wikidata's inclusion standards, which state that “It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity”. There were zero reliable, independent sources, verifiable identifiers, or even sitelinks out there that would indicate any notability. —Hasley+ 02:31, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How we will see unregistered users[edit]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in the Ratification vote of UCoC Enforcement guideline[edit]

This message has been sent because you are administrator in this project. If you voted, Thank you and please ignore this message 🙂

Hello Hasley,

The Ratification vote of Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelinein currently taking place until March 21. If you didn't vote yet, please take a few minutes to participate the ratification vote! Your voice is important.

Best, —YKo (WMF) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Duplicate Conflict[edit]

Dear, Hasley.

I'm seeing this multiple data from List of The Owl House episodes with following Wikidata ID Q97188435 and Q111622109 because the data is duplicate and can't save the progress..

Can you please fix the Wikidata ID Duplicate issue?

Please Procced my Request!

AF1011 (talk) 15:33, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done. —Hasley+ 16:23, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Vandalismo ip 193.144.97.124[edit]

Ola Hasley, penso que habería que tomar algunha mediada coa ip 193.144.97.124 , pois non atende ás advertencias e continúa a facer edicións non constructivas. --Dodro (talk) 14:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Feito, xa o bloqueei por 5 anos por vandalismo. Grazas por avisar! —Hasley+ 15:15, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nuevas cuentas[edit]

Hola Hasley, últimamente en Wikidata he patrullado Cambios recientes y he detectado varias cuentas CPP o spambots que solo tienen ediciones en Wikidata, y que son creadas específicamente para spamear o autopromocionarse aquí a través de sus PU's; sin embargo, si los reporto en Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard‎, se borran las páginas de usuario pero no se bloquean este tipo de cuentas, cuando mucho solo se les coloca una advertencia y a veces tampoco se hace eso, incluso aunque sean CPP's corporativas (ya otro administrador me avisó que no existe el concepto de "cuenta corporativa" en Wikidata) o claros spambots. Mi pregunta es: ¿existen políticas en Wikidata que normen a este tipo de cuentas (algo como WP:CPP o WP:SPAM)? En caso de no haberlas, de todos modos creo necesario reiterar de que existen cuentas creadas específicamente para hacer spam y autopromoción en este proyecto a través de sus páginas de usuario. Saludos Ruy (talk) 06:05, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hola, Ruy. En primer lugar, respecto a «no existe el concepto de "cuenta corporativa"», quiero comentar que en Wikidata no hay una política de nombres de usuario; al igual que en Wikimedia Commons, las cuentas corporativas no están estrictamente prohibidas, siempre y cuando no violen ninguna normativa aplicable, pues esto no es un pase libre para el autobombo.
Respondiendo a tu pregunta, en estos casos prima el sentido común, ya que, aparte de WD:BLOCK, no tenemos una política específica que los regule. Incluso Wikidata:Conflict of interest no es más que una desambiguación. La práctica habitual, recomendada por la política de bloqueos, es dejarle al usuario una advertencia y, si reincide en su conducta improcedente, aplicar las debidas sanciones. En lo personal, yo tiendo a bloquear esa clase de cuentas, aunque eso queda en manos del administrador de turno.
Espero que mi respuesta haya sido satisfactoria. Un saludo, —Hasley + 17:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ediciones disruptivas[edit]

Hola Hasley, quizás te comentaron por IRC que trataba de encontrar un biblio/administrador que entienda de la comunidad de eswiki. Hace rato que vengo encontrando ediciones disruptivas sobre biografías de políticos cubanos por parte de un editor. Justamente hoy lo bloquearon en eswiki por CCP aunque sigue editando por aquí con los mismos procedimientos. Si pudieras darle una mirada sus ediciones, te lo agradecería. Cualquier otra cosa en la que pueda colaborar, a tu disposición. Un saludo. Madamebiblio (talk) 23:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hola, Madamebiblio. He revertido y expulsado al usuario por tratarse de un vándalo evidente. Me encontré, además, con esta otra cuenta: Erick D Bolsonaro 1 —también sancionada en otro proyecto—. Así que he vuelto a bloquearle, esta vez globalmente. Gracias por aviso. Un saludo, —Hasley + 05:15, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Gracias a tí por la pronta resolución de la situación. Saludos. Madamebiblio (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hola, Hasley, nuevamente por aquí y en eswiki el mismo susodicho. Ya puedes comprobar que edita en los mismos art. y elementos, usando el mismo mensaje para las ediciones. La cuenta actual es esta. Gracias desde ya por tu intervención, un saludo. Madamebiblio (talk) 23:11, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done. Saludos, —Hasley + 23:42, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deshacer fusiones[edit]

Hola Hasley. te estoy molestando nuevamente porque desearía una explicación clara (por ello en español, no sea cuestión de liarla más...) sobre cómo colaborar en deshacer fusiones. He encontrado fusiones de elementos de biografías con otro elemento que corresponde al artículo de una enciclopedia. Por ahora lo he visto en artistas donde su elemento (biográfico) lo fusionaron con el elemento que describe su entrada en el diccionario especializado Benezit. ¿Existe una forma sencilla, especialmente cuando hay ediciones posteriores por lo cual no se debería restaurar antes de esa edición? Puedes ver en mis contribuciones que ya deshice uno, el embrollo que quisiera deshacer es Q2901913 y quedan otros tres (creo...). Te agradezco desde ya tu ayuda para contribuir con mejor calidad en WD. Cordialmente. Madamebiblio (talk) 19:54, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hola, Madamebiblio. Atendiendo a aspectos técnicos, el elemento en particular que mencionas no debería ser difícil de arreglar: simplemente hay que deshacer las ediciones erróneas, ir a las entradas que ahora son redirecciones y restaurarlas antes de la fusión. Exactamente lo que hiciste en Q12259628. Pero en los casos especiales que nombras, me temo que no hay una forma sencilla
La alternativa que existe es ir cambio por cambio; es decir, hacerlo todo «a mano». Sé que puede llevar bastante tiempo, pero, lamentablemente, es lo único que se puede hacer. Un saludo, —Hasley + 14:37, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Gracias Harley por tus amables indicaciones, creí que había algún método menos artesanal que desconocía. Por lo menos en estos detectados, ya deshechas las fusiones que no correspondían. Si alguna vez puedo ayudar en algún tema, por favor, cuenta con mi colaboración. Un cordial saludo. Madamebiblio (talk) 22:11, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]