Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive/2015/12

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Q151892

Persistent vandalism. [Semi-]protection needed. Sealle (talk) 06:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Delete new user experiments

Q17339402 and Q16943273. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 19:43, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

 Not done These items are a part of Wikidata:Tours --Pasleim (talk) 19:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Adding en:User:UBX/wine enwiki sitelink to Userbox: wine drinker (Q21666157) was failed due to edit filter. DrSauron (talk) 05:56, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

I added it. I do not know why you did not manage to do it yourself. Pamputt (talk) 08:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
@Pamputt: As DrSauron said, there is an edit filter, preventing ordinary users from adding userpages as sitelinks. - Innocent bystander (talk) 09:02, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation. I was not ware of such filter for ordinary users. Pamputt (talk) 14:59, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

double tap

Je veux ajouter une definition en francais

@CoalhouseJr: : pourrais-tu préciser ce que tu veux faire ? Je ne suis pas sûr de bien comprendre. Merci d'avance. Pamputt (talk) 08:29, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

User:Sic19

I noticed this user mass creating Photographs by John Thomas. The Notability is a bit unclear so I asked the user to please discus this first. Instead of doing that the mass addition continued so I blocked the user to prevent any more damage. If the user agrees to not create any new items pending discussion any admin can unblock (if I don't beat you to it). I'll open a topic at Wikidata:Project chat#Notability of photographs. Multichill (talk) 13:23, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Unblocked. I would appreciate input at Wikidata:Project chat#Notability of photographs. Multichill (talk) 14:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Q20530417, Q18626583

Hi,
In Estonian Wikipedia, the following articles are marked good articles. Can you update these pages and add the good article sign? The articles are: Tuuru–Puise tee (Q18626583) and Tapa vallutamine (Q20530417).
Also there is another problem: The page https://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eri:PagesWithBadges?badge=Q17437798 shows incorrect information: it shows, that in Estonian Wikipedia there are 96 articles marked as good article, but actually there are 125. In Wikidata pages this information is true, but it doesn't show it correctly on the page https://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eri:PagesWithBadges?badge=Q17437798.
Best,
Postituvi (talk) 17:02, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Marked as good ones. About the incompletion, if all of those articles really have the badge here in Wikidata, they might require purging on etwiki and/or even on Wikidata. If this doesn't help, this should be reported to the developers. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 18:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, now it shows correct information. Postituvi (talk) 16:42, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Q15613810

Add "good article" in the article doge (meme) in English. --186.84.46.227 18:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Epìdosis 18:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Q21686563

Hello! Is it possible to rename it into 'The Elder Scrolls:Oblivion' Iniquity (talk) 07:52, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

You can just edit the labels. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 07:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Oh, you just did a bad merge. Fixed it for you. Please know what you are doing in the future. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 07:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, I see. I thought it will rename the article Iniquity (talk) 07:57, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Oh man, thx:) I did it! May u delete Q21686563 Iniquity (talk) 08:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Yup, since it's not older than 24 hour: done. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Thx:) Iniquity (talk) 08:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Q701241

persistent vandalism , semi-protection needed-- Hakan·IST 20:57, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done - 1 week. Mbch331 (talk) 21:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Q133957

Q133957 is subject to fairly frequent vandalism because, amazingly, the people who care about "the Illuminati" have lots of time to vandalise Wikipedia and/or Wikidata. Protection might be useful. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

That's not so frequent. I don't think protection is needed. Mbch331 (talk) 20:24, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Q969810

Bonjour, est-il possible de protéger temporairement la date de naissance indiquée et sourcée sur la notice WD de Fethi Benslama : une IP l'enlève en affirmant qu'il est Fethi Benslama ! Merci, bonne journée, --Pierrette13 (talk) 10:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done for 1 day. Please start a discussion on the talk page about the (disputed) statement. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 10:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Jainism

en:Jainism (item Q9232) is no longer a good article nor a featured one on the english wikipedia. The current status is Delisted good article as it says in the talk page. Please, correct. Thanks--Wikiléptico (talk) 15:40, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Stryn (talk) 15:44, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata:Requests_for_comment/Improve_bot_policy_for_data_import_and_data_modification may be ready for an admin?

At least the item Wikidata:Requests_for_comment/Improve_bot_policy_for_data_import_and_data_modification#Bots_importing_from_wikipedia_should_add_reference_URL_to_page_imported_from seems to have a clear consensus - what needs to happen next? If it's really a consensus do we just need to communicate it widely somehow, post it prominently among policies? I'm not sure how this is supposed to work! ArthurPSmith (talk) 21:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

vandalism on Q3828269

Protection and possible banning the vandal is necessity Hakan·IST 09:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

WD:Rfd

Hi, could somebody have a look on WD:Rfd and complete the requests? I can see a lot of waiting requests. Thank you, --Urbanecm (talk) 18:39, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Q83

persistent ip vandalism on Q83, protection or ban on specific ip may be useful-- Hakan·IST 22:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

I chose to block the user and at the same time collegue User:Hazard-SJ chose to warn the user. If Hazard-SJ or another admin thought the block was premature, please feel free to revert it. Mbch331 (talk) 22:28, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Heavy vandalism

Please restrain editing on Q234651 "Danielle Campbell" - at least 4 IPs keep vadalising it. -- LaddΩ chat ;) 07:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Clear target of anonymous vandalism. Protected the item for a week. If vandalism restarts after that time, come back for a longer protection. Mbch331 (talk) 07:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Yugo (Q21205906) and Zastava Yugo (Q15781)

Please, could someone protect these items as User:Milicevic01 keeps on merging them saying just «same car!!!!!!» while I keep on explaining why they shouldn't be merged in his talk page? Otherwise could some admins say who's wrong and who's right? Sincerely I'm fed up with keeping on rollbacking his merges. Thank you very much! --★ → Airon 90 21:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Fot the last time its a same car, just because they changed the name and added more plastic on it dosent make it different! --Milicevic01 (talk) 21:21, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Again, for the last time, the items are about two different object with different data (#2 of WD:Notability) and different wikilinks (#1 of WD:Notability). Instead of rollbacking, as I'm really fed up of you and your rollbacks, I wait for an answer from other users. --★ → Airon 90 21:39, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Moreover, it:Zastava Koral doesn't have an item on Wikidata as you merge Yugo (Q21205906) in Zastava Yugo (Q15781), which has it:Zastava Yugo. I keep on rollbacking. --★ → Airon 90 08:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

I protected both items for a week which should be sufficient for you to come to an agreement. Csigabi (talk) 09:07, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thank you. Now I write the same post into WD:RFC as we need comments from other users. --★ → Airon 90 18:25, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

We discovered that he has an eye problem so i urge everyone to find concrete differences for (according to user Arion90) different cars 1990 Yugo Koral and 2006 Zastava Koral if needed i will provide more detailed images --Milicevic01 (talk) 16:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

VladimirZhV

I blocked indefinitely VladimirZhV (talk • contribs • logs) for unjustified removal of sitelinks from items. He basically fixed the links to bg.wp, and then just removed all other sitelinks with no apparent reason: this is an example of an item fixed by Ato 01, who didn't wrote to the user by the way. He's been active since three weeks at least doing this. EDIT: he did this basically always, forcing other users to fix his behaviour since months (see this. I'll probably need a help in checking his contribs. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 21:57, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

I would not choose indef. blocking as their work is indeed valuable (like here), however those removals should not happen. Could someone break the language barrier and explain them what they did wrong and then unblock them? Matěj Suchánek (talk) 13:07, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
It seems odd that the talk page of VladimirZhV (talk • contribs • logs) prior to the block is empty. --- Jura 13:34, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
On it.wp we're particularly strong-handed with these cases. However, since this is not it.wp and that there are some good edits, I'm willing to remodulate the block to only three days, two of which already spent, on the condition that unjustified removals will not be tolerated any more. If he does this again, I'll go for another sensitive block (more like three months or so), reserving indefinite as the last occurrence. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 18:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

2003:66:8F2A:1AF6:C557:135:FB9A:7BDC

What to do with 2003:66:8F2A:1AF6:C557:135:FB9A:7BDC (talk • contribs • logs)? Users like this really makes patrolling changes harder. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 11:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

I've been marking a lot of these edits as patrolled because they are factually right. They really ought to be done from an account with a bot flag though. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
I think this is the same person I spoke to at a different IP some months ago. We had a bit of a discussion, with me telling him about the benefits of being logged in, and he wished to remain anonymous. That's his good right, too! Annoying, yes; but we just have to respect his decision. Jared Preston (talk) 15:59, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
24x7 editing for days and days without the need to eat, sleep or go to the toilet? No mistakes at all? That's the mark of a bot, not a human. They are adding a lot of value, but the bot policy suggests they ought to have a bot account and it go through the approval process. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:07, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Actually, I'll take that back. The addition of the links to the various databases are suggested by WD:PST. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Ehmmm. PST isn't enabled by default and anonymous users don't have a preferences section to activate PST. Mbch331 (talk) 17:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Also, edits done with PST should be appended with a edit summary indicating that. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 17:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
A logged-in pseudonymous account is more anonymous than an IP address. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:37, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Per Tom, block the user for running an unauthorized bot and advise the IP that he is required to register an account for a bot. --Izno (talk) 19:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
And if I read the bot policy in its intent and not its present verbiage, he is also required to register an account for his primary user if he intends to operate a bot. --Izno (talk) 19:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Q16335075

Persistent edit warring. Sealle (talk) 18:55, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Too late, it stopped four days ago.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
@Ymblanter: four days ago? Sealle (talk) 19:31, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Oh, I see, I though only Moscow Connection and RGloucester were involved. Fully protected for two weeks.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps the issue would be at least partly eased by the addition of citations of reliable sources? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:33, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

I am amazed there is no discussion on the talk page there yet... But yes, it looks like references would help everything here. ·addshore· talk to me! 21:30, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
I guess the parties are just continuing what they are used to in the English Wikipedia.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:36, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Yugo (Q21205906) and Zastava Yugo (Q15781), part 2

Please, could someone protect these items as User:Milicevic01 uncollaboratively keeps on merging them even if nothing has been decided in the RfC (more precisely: 2 out of 3 users want to keep the items separated)? Thank you very much! --★ → Airon 90 00:02, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Since there is no separate protection against merging item, I placed a full protection until the end of the RfC. Please come back here when the RfC is closed and the protection can be lifted. Mbch331 (talk) 08:41, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

And again i urge everyone to find concrete differences for (according to user Arion90) different cars 1990 Yugo Koral and 2006 Zastava Koral if needed i will provide more detailed images; also see en:Rebadging. Far is my uncollaboratively, well i am true believer in this policy --Milicevic01 (talk) 10:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

@Milicevic01: First off, that page (DNFTT) doesn't apply here, because there aren't any grounds to call Airon90 a troll. Secondly, you and Airon90 should be aware that further edit warring by either or both of you is grounds for a block of whoever does it. No exceptions. We should not have to protect the items from other potentially legitimate edits because of edit warring by only a few users. Please get to a consensus with arguments based on reliable sources (pictures alone do not suffice). As for whether a rebadge of a car should be considered to be different from the original, that should be discussed at the RfC.--Jasper Deng (talk) 10:14, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Yes it does, but you need to look at his comments. Far i'm concerned life is too short to waste my time on persons like him, i guess asking him to use commons sens is a bit to much. Over and out --Milicevic01 (talk) 10:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
@Milicevic01: Such statements constitute personal attacks and assumption of bad faith. It doesn't matter how "wrong" you think Airon90 is. This is a collaborative project. If they are working in good faith, which I can see here, then you have to work with them.--Jasper Deng (talk) 18:29, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

converted disambig. and duplicate

Former disambig. page Cooney (Q1129762) appears to have became duplicate of Cooney (Q21492966) resulting creation of Cooney (Q21842515) which is duplicate of former disambig. Likely a restore and merge is necessary but is enwiki:Cooney a disambig. page? A third eye would be nice. Hakan·IST 08:45, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

All done, en.wiki isn't a disambig page <spam on>Disambiguator_tool_request<spam off> *<|:-) --ValterVB (talk) 09:24, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Jelena Jankovic

The article about Jelena Jankovic is good on Serbian Wikipedia, but there is no badges on Wikidata. Please, could someone add it? --Uw17 (talk) 00:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done. You can add it yourself next time, see Help:Sitelinks#Badges. Lakokat 04:37, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
No, s/he can't because users must be autoconfirmed (or manually confirmed). Stryn (talk) 08:11, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, I have already tried to add it, but I can't. --Uw17 (talk) 12:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Q6078886

Could Q6078886 be redirected to Q20793137? Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 02:17, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done in Special:Diff/286662804, thanks for your help. P.S. for future reference, there's Special:RedirectEntity.  Hazard SJ  02:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Help topics are hard to find, thanks. 117Avenue (talk) 02:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

I can't update

Hello, I can't update the status of:

Q15644223 (Accidentul aviatic din Munții Apuseni din 2014)
Q3967411 (Escadrila Albă)
Q397123 (Ștefan Luchian)
Q788822 (Ea (film))
Q20433042 (Euroregiunea Prutul de Sus)
Q180581 (Milan Baroš)
Q977932 (Friedrich Mieß)
Q827212 (Achiziția Gadsden)
Q12721019 (Arthur Coulin)

On ro.wikipedia.org there are good articles. Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 21:46, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

It's done. It seems that you figured out how to do it yourself as well. --- Jura 22:27, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Yes, but still I' m not a trusted user, so that some of you still give me revert. Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 22:37, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Item delete

Could you delete Q21877579 (Drumul Talienilor), because it is already in use (look at Q18539849) ? Thanks ! Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 18:26, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done --ValterVB (talk) 18:30, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
For future reference, please use Wikidata:RFD. eurodyne (talk) 18:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive/2015/12&oldid=291859520"