User talk:Ymblanter

If you leave a message here, I will answer it here. So check back later.
If I left a message on your talk page, please reply there. I will watch your page and reply as soon as I can.

Archive 2012-2020

Reminder

Hello Ymblanter!

Please remember to update Wikidata:List of administrators, Wikidata:Administrators by language/Table (if possible), Template:CurrentAdmins, Template:AdminsChart and MediaWiki:Gadget-markAdmins.js every time you promote a new admin. Thank you very much. Vogone talk 13:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I actually remember this, but not always have time to fill in the info right after the promotion. Thanks for reminding anyway.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:22, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Deletion Of Q104822142.

Hello Dear Admin, I Created (Zeyan Shafiq) page on wikipedia. i had started exploring wikidata, so i found a wikidata article for the same(Q104822142) which was deleted by you. it was requested by a Disruptive editing user(Autobot312), it seems like a fake account made to vandalise the articles as you can check he has done it multiple times, he has deleted, blanked the page many times which was reverted back by another editor. i have written all the data myself there, you have completely deleted the page, you should have moved it to draft page so that i can make more improvements if it was incorrect. i request you to kindly restore the page, all the notability references are on wikipedia(Zeyan Shafiq).Hums4r (talk) 20:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

We have a policy, Wikidata:Notability. Could you please explain which criterion the deleted item satisfies.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:39, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ymblanter: thanks for the reply admin, as mentioned, wikidata has its two main goals for notability, should have a page to any other wiki project

(Zeyan Shafiq) has a article on wikipedia. and this data can be described using serious and publicly available references which are all mentioned on the wikipedia page in references, dear admin i am new to wikidata so i don't have enough knowledge but this wikidata item was automatically created and i just added information and data to improve it further, i work on kashmir topics, you can check i research about all the items, if i find anything not notable i post it for deletion, but everything i added to this data was completely sourced, i have put references of each thing, i request you to kindly undelete the page so as it may serve as information. even you can check the data that i have put in this(Q104822142), if there is anything incorrect give me a chance to improve but deleting it directly just spoils my hard work. thanks admin Hums4r (talk) 21:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Could you please give a reference to the Wikipedia article.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ymblanter:, Surely admin, (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeyan_Shafiq) this article was created by me on wiki,later i was suggested by admins to not work on creating articles since i was new, so i started exploring other wiki projects like wiki media and wiki data to improve kashmir's topics on wiki projects.Hums4r (talk) 21:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

I restored the item and added the sitelink.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ymblanter:, Extremely grateful dear admin, thanks for helping out. also a request to you, while i was researching on wiki data pages, i found out many kashmiri with wikidata pages, i tried to research on them but i found out nothing at all, no notable source, also looks like promotional to me. also checked that they have done it multiple times in past and also they are making the pages everyday, kind of spamming i guess. kindly have a look if you feel like something is wrong,(I might be wrong,forgive me for that, but i just think they are not notable).

1.Q104884091 2.Q104882564 Old deleted page: Q104832010. Hums4r (talk) 22:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Два элемента по одной теме

Здравствуйте, Ymblanter. В Викиданных есть форум, на который можно обращаться с подобной проблемой? Пока решил обратиться к Вам. Элементы Q48834311 и Q99693681 на одну тематику. Вот только первый создан раньше, но практически пустой, кроме одного идентификатора, а второй создан позже, но имеет больше утверждений и идентификаторов. Я перенёс ссылку итальянской Википедии из первого элемента во второй, и первый теперь, по сути, не имеет смысла. Ещё у меня также вопрос: почему я не могу добавить итальянское название и описание, я должен обладать какими-то правами на это, или должен поменять язык в настройках? — Владлен Манилов (talk) 12:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Я объединил два элемента. Подходящий форум - Wikidata:Project Chat. Да, Вы видите только те языки, которые у Вас прописаны в meta:babel. Я установел себе гаджет label lister, он позволяет добавлять описания на любых языках.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Links to redirects (again)

Hi, I found your close of the Wikidata links to redirects RFC from a few years ago and would like to discuss if anything has progressed since then. I'm not sure if you're aware, but there is currently a big push to delete many (possibly thousands) articles on borderline notable sportspeople who meet a NSPORTS SNG notability requirement (attended an Olympic Games, played professional football, cricket etc) but who don't meet the GNG. I am against this, but it seems like it is a lost battle.

This week one of those articles was deleted. I recreated it as a redirect to the team's historical list of players, but couldn't recreate the Wikidata link. Q22280175 to be specific, but there will soon be a lot more of these.

In 2018 when the links discussion was held, was there widespread use of the redirect templates, like R from member or R from shortname? Could it be possible to create a list of which of these templates allows for a Wikidata link (like member of group), and which don't (like spelling errors, capitalisation etc). Ping User:Lydia_Pintscher_(WMDE). The-Pope (talk) 04:11, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

I am sorry but I do not have any specific knowledge of the issue. Asking at Project Chat would be more efficient.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:49, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

User page

Hello Ymblanter, can you delete thes pages:

• User:OvalThunder9

OvalThunder9 (talk) 19:15, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Why I can't Create item with Brandon See Name?

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4769-4383 2401:4900:4638:BB7C:C441:26E4:B983:820B 18:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

I do not know. May be the item does not meet our notability criteria?--Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

(This action has been automatically identified as harmful, and therefore disallowed. If you believe your action was constructive, please inform an administrator of what you were trying to do. A brief description of the abuse rule which your action matched is: LTA M4

Language:) This message show when we create item with this title, please check this and solve2401:4900:4638:BB7C:C441:26E4:B983:820B 19:03, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I really do not know. You may want to ask at Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Peter Brandt

For some reason Q106533335 which was deleted by you april 18, keeps showing up in my queries for danes without Danish labels. Any idea how to fix that? --Hjart (talk) 10:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

No, sorry, I do not know. It should not be happening.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Call for participation in the interview study with Wikidata editors

Dear Ymblanter,

I hope you are doing good,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at the King’s College London, and I work on a project as part of my PhD research that develops a personalized recommendation system to suggest Wikidata items for the editors based on their interests and preferences. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.

I would love to talk with you to know about your current ways to choose the items you work on in Wikidata and understand the factors that might influence such a decision. Your cooperation will give us valuable insights into building a recommender system that can help improve your editing experience.

Participation is completely voluntary. You have the option to withdraw at any time. Your data will be processed under the terms of UK data protection law (including the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018). The information and data that you provide will remain confidential; it will only be stored on the password-protected computer of the researchers. We will use the results anonymized (?) to provide insights into the practices of the editors in item selection processes for editing and publish the results of the study to a research venue. If you decide to take part, we will ask you to sign a consent form, and you will be given a copy of this consent form to keep.

If you’re interested in participating and have 15-20 minutes to chat (I promise to keep the time!), please either contact me on kholoudsaa@gmail.com or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdmmFHaiB20nK14wrQJgfrA18PtmdagyeRib3xGtvzkdn3Lgw/viewform?usp=sf_link with your choice of the times that work for you.

I’ll follow up with you to figure out what method is the best way for us to connect.

Please contact me using the email mentioned above if you have any questions or require more information about this project.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.

Regards

Kholoud

assorted abuses

there were new pages, even very PSYCHO-tic, see this Category:Wikidata:Deletion all caught myself, DEL'EM'ALL!!!

НТЗ для крымских объектов

Добрый день. Не знаю к кому обращаться по поводу проблем на ВикиДанных, поэтому напишу Вам. Участник Infovarius сделал у крымских объектов приоритет России выше Украины. Тем самым нарушив НТЗ в статьях различных вики-проектов. Я написал ему на странице обсуждения, но проблему он, видимо, исправлять не собирается. Что делать в таком случае? --Mitte27 (talk) 09:38, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Надо с ним разбираться, он обычно отвечает.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:42, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

TA request

Hi. I have an open TA request here. If you can, could you check it out? Thanks! ━ ALBERTOLEONCIO Who, me? 14:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 18:12, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata:Project_chat#Subway_modelling_on_P197

Ярослав, добрый день. Прошу вас оценить тему на форуме. Возможно, я слишком нахраписто стал возражать товарищу и отменять его правки, а здесь так не принято? Michgrig (talk) 22:14, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Ну, я ничего особенного там не вижу, к сожалению, пока приняли участие только три человека. Можно попробовать на Wikidata:WikiProject Railways дать объявление, но, вообще, эти темы тут мало кого интересуют.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Да ладно, вроде они меня убедили. Я, скорее, зацепился за формулировки в стартовом сообщении. Michgrig (talk) 21:08, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Тонкий вопрос.

Добое время суток. Тонкий вопрос

Вот у него Q84514 указано место рождения Q51367625, но когда он родился, Бельгии-то еще не было, а вот в информации об этом городе указано государство Бельгия. А потом это автоматом транслируется на рувики в статью про персону. Но в в люом сдучае, гос принадлежность города была не всегда Бельгия. Как бы это указать в Q51367625.Longbowman (talk) 17:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

По-моему, надо в Q84514 какой-то квалификатор поставить. Но, вообще, я в луа не очень.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:41, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

@Longbowman, с этим вопросом можно обратиться на форум Викиданных в рувики, там такие вопросы чаще всего решают.

Ярослав, вы правы, это решается проставлением квалификаторов дат начала и окончания у административно-территориальных единиц верхнего уровня. Michgrig (talk) 05:22, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Bot requests

Hi, I'm mentoring a couple of new bot editors via Outreachy, if you could have a look at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/AmmarBot 2 and Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/NiraliBot (also Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/AmmarBot - but that's more complicated) to make sure they're not hanging around for too long, that would be really great please. :-) Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I have all active requests for bot permission on my watchlist.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Encouraging good summaries

Hi. I saw you approved https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Bot/AmmarBot_2 which currently uploads without any summary at all. I contacted the author and opened and issue here https://github.com/Ammarpad/OutreachyProject/issues/6 --So9q (talk) 09:14, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

@Ammarpad, Mike Peel:--Ymblanter (talk) 18:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. I responded to the issue on GitHub. I will provide a link to the approval page in edit summary for the edits. Ammarpad (talk) 15:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Гидра

Добрый день. Мы в рувики заблокировали статью о незаконном ресурсе от неавтоподтвержденных, чтобы не добавляли ссылки на наркосайты. Но теперь они подтягиваются из викиданных, где идет война правок между двумя наркоторговцами. Пожалуйста, заблокируйте обоих и статью от неавтоподтвержденных или что-то такое. --Springbok (talk) 19:34, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:38, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Спасибо. --Springbok (talk) 19:38, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

OpenCitations Bot

I thank you for your efforts. We have reached a consensus about my OpenCitations Bot. Please refer to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Bot/OpenCitations_Bot. Now, the source code is tested and verified and we restricted its function to the addition of cites work relations so that Wikidata would not be overwhelmed. I ask if it can be currently granted a bot flag to begin working. --Csisc (talk) 12:43, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

I will grant the flag in a few days provided no objections have been raised.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:12, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Who can I contact to revoke your administrator rights?--Zubryckiy (talk) 01:56, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

You have to contact the community. Open a new request here, following instructions on the top of that page.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

And be quick, because it will be more difficult to do after I block you indef.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:38, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Q107746660 deletion

Hi Ymblanter, thanks for taking action on my deletion request for Q107746660 yesterday. Ironically, I now found that this particular page by User:Sibinia was actually not a hoax after all – the item is a notable manuscript codex and actually known under the name of "Псалтирь Ивана Грозного" [1] or "Ivan the Terrible Psalter" [2]. Unfortunately I've still not found the true source of the full-text digitized file that was uploaded on Commons, but other than that, the entry seems legit now. Would you like to restore it? Thanks, – Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk) 10:04, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

 Done, though the images look very strange to me - I have a bit of understanding of Russian art, and they do not look to me like 16th century Russia.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. You're quite right, of course – the manuscript is 14th century, not 16th, and of course it wasn't authored by Ivan, but it's conventionally named after him, apparently because it was in his possession at some point. An interesting and high-quality book in any case; I might even end up writing an article about it. Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk) 10:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. Will be looking forward to see the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:21, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Q16983413 Ayasdi please undelete

I have reliable external sources on this, please undelete. ArthurPSmith (talk) 15:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 15:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Квалификатор "по направлению к" для соседних жд станций

Ярослав, добрый день!
Я как-то вас спрашивал, исходя из чего вы указываете значения квалификатора towards (P5051) для свойства adjacent station (P197), и вы сказали, что основываетесь на границах участков, которые приведены в перечне станций "Тарифные расстояния" (видимо, имея в виду "Тарифное руководство №4").
И вот теперь я больше погрузился в тему, и возник дополнительный вопрос. Для станций Киевского направления МЖД вы указали участки "Москва - Солнечная" и "Солнечная - Лесной Городок" (например, для Переделкина). Но в ТР №4 я виду участок Москва-Сортировочная-Киевская - Бекасово-I (здесь или здесь в Книге 2). Вы пользовались каким-то другим источником или ошиблись? Michgrig (talk) 17:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Да, я сейчас посмотрел, в моём файле Москва-Сортировочная-Киевская - Бекасово-I, но там нет станций Новопеределкино и аэропорт Внуково. Думаю, они там в какой-то момент появятся, и участки станут до Солнечной и Лесного Городка (так как тарифные участки они ставят между пересадочными станциями), но, в принципе, пока можно везде поставить Бекасово и Киевский вокзал (кроме самих ответвлений).--Ymblanter (talk) 17:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Понял, спасибо! Michgrig (talk) 16:09, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Q24699193

Hello,

could you please restore this item? It has been recreated: Q108804436. Hence both should be merged.

Nomen ad hoc (talk) 11:31, 5 October 2021 (UTC).

I do not see the notability bin the recreated item, may be it should be deleted?--Ymblanter (talk) 11:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

It fulfils a structural need, as the item's subject has authored a cited (and mentioned on French WP) article. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 13:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC).

Sorry, I see that you already tried to discuss with the administrator who deleted the item, Nikki, but they did not agree. Given that the item had serious issues, you should continue discussing with them and not involve other admins (and certainly not without telling them about this discussion).--Ymblanter (talk) 13:09, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Well, I thought you remembered that it was you to ask me to recreate an item about this person. The logical consequence sounded me to restore the deleted item and to merge it with the other.

Furthermore, Nikki didn't answered my last messages.

Nomen ad hoc (talk) 14:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC).

This is quite possible, but if I see the item which was deleted with the comment that it was retargeted, made a complete mess, and the notability is not obvious, it is much safer to add needed information to the recreated item.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

OK, which information is needed please? Nomen ad hoc (talk) 08:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC).

Sorry, may be I was not clear enough: I am not going to restore the item. Ymblanter (talk) 09:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

If Q24699193 in its original form represents the same person as Q108804436, then it should be recreated, rolled back to its stable state, and the items merged into the older version. If the contention is that the subject of Q108804436 is not notable, then that should be nominated for deletion and discussed accordingly.

There is no logical basis for keeping Q108804436 and not Q24699193, if the subjects are the same. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

I believe Q108804436 is not notable, but in any case the same person who created Q24699193 also retargeted it. Ymblanter (talk) 14:48, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Good morning. (i) Q108804436 is notable per N, 3, as it "fulfills a structural need" on Q108432832. (ii) The original subject of Q24699193 is the same: hence IMHO we should restore it, and revert / mask all private / unrelated datas. Regards, Nomen ad hoc (talk) 09:48, 23 November 2022 (UTC).

I am afraid at this point you would need to go to the Administrator's Noticeboard. Ymblanter (talk) 10:45, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Globally-locked user

Hi, Ymblanter, sorry to bother you – you're the only person I know to be an admin here. Just wanted to give a heads-up that all of this is block evasion by a globally-locked LTA (see here), as is all of this and this. I've no idea how you handle these things here, so just dumping this in your lap in case any action is needed. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. The user is already blocked indef, and the IPs are dynamic and a week old, so there is probably nothing else to do here right now, but I will have this in mind if new socks show up. Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

И снова Гидра

Привет, после окончания защиты там опять стали проталкивать левые ссылки без источников. На данный момент я вернул версию с источником, но нужно снова защитить от анонимов. 5.167.100.4 19:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Защитил на год.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:55, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Спасибо! Кстати, на мете идёт вялое обсуждение того, допустимы ли ссылки на даркнет-маркеты в проектах Фонда (т.е. в Викиданных тоже), возможно, вы захотите высказать аргументы против или за. 5.167.100.4 19:59, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Request to check out long-standing deletion request

Hi, I was wondering if you might be able to check out this deletion request, which I have contested. It's been open for the past few weeks, and I'd really like a resolution on it at some point. No worries if you can't get to it, but I would appreciate it if you have the time. Yitzilitt (talk) 00:28, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

I am sorry but I agree this is promotional and not notable.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Разблокировка бота

Добрый день!

Разрешение получено. Нужно ещё что-то для разблокировки бота? Игорь Темиров (talk) 13:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

А, прошу прощения, я просто забыл. Сейчас разблокирую.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:38, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Спасибо. Игорь Темиров (talk) 13:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Железнодорожная станция vs. остановочный пункт

Ярослав, добрый день!
Когда я создаю или редактирую элементы, посвященные российским ЖД объектам, то я выбираю значение свойства instance of (P31) так, как это обычно принято: если у объекта есть путевое развитие, то это railway station (Q55488), а если путевого развития нет, то это railway stop (Q55678) (да вы и сами недавно то же самое писали). Valishchevo (Q97446829) на схеме линии показывается как о.п.; в названии статьи (несуществующей) об этом объекте написано "платформа"; Яндекс карта показывает его тоже как о.п. Поэтому мне не очень понятно, почему вы заменили значение свойства instance of (P31) с "о.п." на "станция", причем только здесь. Michgrig (talk) 08:27, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Добрый день. Если я иду в элемент Q55488 и оттуда в статью английской Википедии, я ничего такого не вижу. Там написано "A train station, railway station, railroad station or depot is a railway facility or area where trains regularly stop to load or unload passengers, freight or both". Под это подходят все наши станции. Я понимаю, что в России есть различия между станцией, платформой, разъездом и остановочным пунктом, но я не думаю, что у нас есть достаточно данных, чтобы эти различия фиксировать самим и добавлять в Викиданные. Вы же видели, как иностранные коллеги давеча отреагировали на сам факт наличия того, что railway stop может быть добавлен как P31.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

С другой стороны, в англовики есть такая статья, в которой написано "A station stop usually does not have any tracks other than the main tracks, and may or may not have switches (points, crossovers).", что как раз подходит под русское понимание о.п.

Разницу между платформой и остановочным пунктом я, честно говоря, не уверен, что понимаю. На мой взгляд, платформа - это исключительно бетонная плита, на которой пассажиры ожидают поезда, но, возможно, это не единственное значение этого слова.

Вы же видели, как иностранные коллеги давеча отреагировали на сам факт наличия того, что railway stop может быть добавлен как P31.

Эта фраза звучит прямо как из уст Путина или Лаврова :)))

Насколько я понял, основная проблема была не в факте использования двух вариантов значения р31, а в том, что для обоих этих значений нет общего верхнеуровневого значения, поэтому приходится в запросах использовать ИЛИ.

Но в целом, если вы считаете, что лучше для всех объектов использовать railway station (Q55488), я так и буду делать для дальнейших станций. Michgrig (talk) 09:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Да, я бы, честно говоря, использовал railway station для всех такого типа объектов. Мне кажется, мы решаем имеющиеся проблемы и ничего не теряем. Если потом кому-то захочется взять тарифное руководство и пройти по всем станциям, можно будет придумать для этого какой-нибудь квалификатор. Ymblanter (talk) 09:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Хорошо, договорились. Michgrig (talk) 09:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Замечательно, спасибо. Ymblanter (talk) 09:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Сейчас прохожусь по существующим российским объектам с railway stop (Q55678), удаляю его и потом добавлю туда railway station (Q55488).

Какая все-таки хорошая штука https://quickstatements.toolforge.org :))) Michgrig (talk) 12:53, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/IngeniousBot 2

Hi! Regarding the following bot request, Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/IngeniousBot 2, I never got an answer whether the request also could be valid for when the 2022 population data is available. - Premeditated (talk) 11:32, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes, please go ahead (assuming the workflow is the same as for 2021).--Ymblanter (talk) 11:34, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello

Hello Ymblabter, I saw you in wikidata admin list and have a request for you. Can you please delete my Userpage here in Wikidata? Thankyou. Zoglophie (talk) 12:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Sure,  Done Ymblanter (talk) 12:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Скрыть правки

Добрый день! Есть участник с мягко говоря неоднозначным вкладом в виде описаний элементов, его глобальный вклад аналогичен. Хотелось бы скрыть эти правки, а не просто отменить, ну и возможно глобально заблокировать учетку. Пишу к Вам, а не на Форум, так как врядли смогу все это объяснить по-английски, да и для понимания правок тоже нужно знание русского языка. --Ksc~ruwiki (talk) 16:53, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Спасибо! --Ksc~ruwiki (talk) 15:49, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Q6310797 / Jumapao (surname)

Hello Ymblanter, item Q6310797 is strange: you deleted it a few months ago, but it's still available with SPARQL (Q6310797 (query)). Could you have a look please ? Thank you --- Caméléon Diaphane (talk) 23:22, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

I am sorry I am not the right person to answer this.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:17, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Question about updating markAdmins

Доброе утро Ymblanter,

I saw that you updated the macAdmins gadget. You entered the new stewards. But why did you remove user Melos? He's still active as a steward. Can you please check that again? Спасибо и наилучшими пожеланиями --Funkruf (talk) 00:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

He is retiring, see the talk page of the gadget.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:21, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. --Funkruf (talk) 01:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Request rollback

I would like to request for rollback rights to bring back the vandalism and test edits. I hope there will be many more vandalisms here in the future. I already have rollback rights on bnwiki.my information Thank you.Prince ovy (talk) 06:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

You only started actively editing here three days ago. Please continue your work and in a few months apply at the request permission page. Ymblanter (talk) 06:24, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

@Ymblanter can you see [3] Almost a day has passed.thank you Prince ovy (talk) 15:29, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Блокировка

@Ymblanter, будьте добры, заблокируйте этого вандала. Calvinn1 (talk) 15:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

 Done Ymblanter (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Спасибо! Calvinn1 (talk) 16:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

@Ymblanter, не могли бы ещё, пожалуйста, это заблокировать. Или лучше предупреждения выдать, мол не нужно указывать свой личный фан-аккаунт в ВД? calvin (talk) 18:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

А в чём проблемы с этими правками?--Ymblanter (talk) 18:58, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Ну я как понимаю аноним добавляет фанатский Telegram-аккаунт в элемент, когда там уже имеется официальная ссылка. calvin (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

При двух правках нект смысла блокировать, скорее всего, он тут больше не появится.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

¿Por qué revierten ediciones y bloquean?

Si no se aporto fuentes que corrobore que tenia exactamente 50 y CERO años de edad. En TLoU2 Joel según el Fandom esta a principios de sus 50s (o sea que puede tener cualquier edad entre 50 y 53 años) no directamente 50... Ven que ustedes son bravucones vándalos! Que asco me dan! Bloquean el artículo y me banean, creando además discusiones absurdas ¿cuantos años tienen? Su comportamiento parece el de un niño fanboy que quiere que las cosas sean como el quiere porque si. Impresionante que tengan más de 30 AÑOS y actuen así, hombres grandes, maldita sea. Impresionante 171.6.5.159 01:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

This makes it pretty clear you should not be here. Ymblanter (talk) 07:02, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Al menos te fijaste en la fuente Fandom, si lo hubieras hecho sabrías que me da la razón a mi y no a ustedes. En ningún lado dice que nació en 1984! Dice que nació a principios o mediados de los 80s (Principios = 80 a 83 / Mediados = 84 a 86). Y si, tienes razón, con gente como ustedes es imposible, sorprende que ustedes estén a cargo. 46.166.163.178 13:50, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Vete. Ymblanter (talk) 15:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Pi bot task advice

Hi Ymblanter. Yesterday I coded up Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/Pi bot 25 (properties for deletion page management), which was working fine when testing with my account. However, I've since realised that one of the pages it updates, Template:Watchlist summary/PFD, is a protected page and only admins can edit it. I'm not too sure how to resolve this - either reducing the page protection, or getting admin status for Pi bot (or Pi admin bot?) I guess. Would appreciate your thoughts on the best way forward here. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 05:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

I think both are in principle possible, but it is better to discuss the issue on a broader noticeboard, either Project chat or the Administrators Noticeboard. Ymblanter (talk) 05:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I've followed up at Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard#Bot-maintaining_protected_page?. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:49, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Now at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Pi admin bot. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:08, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Why did you delete my page. Y'all are always messing with people! I filled out all that info just for you to delete it the next day man thats crazy

Y'all are always messing with people! I filled out all that info just for you to delete it the next day man thats crazy. Smoove Diego (talk) 20:30, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Because you are not notable and the page was in fact spam. Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Rakvere baptist church

The issue is that Rakvere Karmel congregation (Q61393123) is about congregation (organization) while Commons category appears to about the (old) building of this congregation. I was about to clear this up. If you truely believe that this building is not notable (as indicated in deletion log) then I suppose Commons category shouldn't be linked with Wikidata as matching item doesn't exist. 2001:7D0:81E6:EF80:699E:427:895B:45CB 06:55, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

The Wikipedia article is about the building. Ymblanter (talk) 06:59, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

No, actually it is not. I will restore the item now but please make sure that from thew Commons category there is a way to get to the article and vice versa. Ymblanter (talk) 07:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112415608

Bonjour, vous avez supprimé la page Q112415608 et son contenu a été recrée sur Q112892755, pourriez-vous rediriger la nouvelle page vers l'ancienne page. Merci d'avance, Méphisto38 (talk) 6 juillet 2022 à 07:00 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 07:08, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/ADSBot English Paper

Hi Ymblanter. I've registered a bot User:ADSEnglishBot, instead of User:ADSBot since there's a similar username ads-bot already existed on wiki.

Can you give me the bot User:ADSEnglishBot status? Feliciss (talk) 10:49, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

 Done Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Bot request

Hi, any chance you could have a look at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/PangolinBot 1 soon please? Would be good if the student could make progress with running it soon, and it doesn't look like there are objections? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

 Done Ymblanter (talk) 21:18, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Просьба о блокировке вандала

Добрый день! Вы бы не могли заблокировать участника Karasikpro228. Вклад однодневный (неделю назад) содержит только оскорбления в описаниях элементов. Ksc~ruwiki (talk) 19:54, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

 Done Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Smartmuses

Добрый день. У меня ощущение, что участник или сознательно вандалит или не понимает что делает. Разбираю иллюстрации и нашёл уже четыре ложных привязки за его авторством: фото реки Куйчук подсунуто в Караайры, фото озера Аккем подсунуто реке Аккем, фото одной Чайи подсунуто другой, [4]. Причём все три файла уже были привязаны к нужным элементам. 185.16.137.166 10:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Он не правил с июня, и в июне ему уже на это указывали. Нет смысла сейчас что-то делать, но если такое поведение повторится, возможно, придётся блокировать. Ymblanter (talk) 10:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

А есть ли возможность найти все его добавления с учётом типов объектов? 185.16.137.166 12:32, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Наверное, можно всякими инструментами, но я не умею. Средствами движка, по-моему, нет. Ymblanter (talk) 12:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Возможно есть смысл отменить все его правки по иллюстрациям, брака уже очень много. 185.16.137.166 12:40, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Это может сделать кто угодно, тут права администратора не нужны. Ymblanter (talk) 12:52, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Γεράσιμος Λυκιαρδόπουλος

== Γεράσιμος Λυκιαρδόπουλος[επεξεργασία | Προσθήκη θέματος] ==

ημερομηνία θανάτου 2013 αναφέρεται στο

ΜΑΚ

ΑΝΑΓΝΩΡΙΣΤΙΚΌ PLWABN

9810614189705606

θέμα που ονομάζεται ως

Γεράσιμος Λυκιαρδόπουλος ΛΑΘΟΣ ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q17401792&oldid=1752518563 ΛΑΘΟΣ https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q17401792&oldid=1752621663 Ενόη89 (talk) 06:07, 17 Οκτωβρίου 2022

Ενόη89 (talk) 06:10, 17 Οκτωβρίου 2022 (UTC) Ενόη89 (talk) 06:45, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Sorry I do not speak Greek. Ymblanter (talk) 06:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

= Γεράσιμος Λυκιαρδόπουλος[επεξεργασία | Προσθήκη θέματος] ==

ημερομηνία θανάτου 2013 αναφέρεται στο

ΜΑΚ

ΑΝΑΓΝΩΡΙΣΤΙΚΌ PLWABN

9810614189705606

θέμα που ονομάζεται ως

Γεράσιμος Λυκιαρδόπουλος ΛΑΘΟΣ ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q17401792&oldid=1752518563 ΛΑΘΟΣ https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q17401792&oldid=1752621663 Ενόη89 (talk) 06:07, 17 Οκτωβρίου 2022

Ενόη89 (talk) 06:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

ΛΑΘΟΣ ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη Ενόη89 (talk) 06:49, 17 Οκτωβρίου 2022 Ενόη89 (talk) 06:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Γεράσιμος Λυκιαρδόπουλο

ΛΑΘΟΣ ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη Ενόη89 (talk) 06:49, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Solman9 bijdragen

Hoi, ik zag dat je Solman9 hebt geblokkeerd. De nieuw aangemaakte items zien er allemaal wat twijfelachtig uit. Had jij daar toevallig al naar gekeken? Iemand die de taal begrijpt kan het waarschijnlijk beter inschatten, maar geen idee wie te vragen. Multichill (talk) 10:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Nee, ik heb daar niet gekeken, maar ik zie dat sommige een sitelink hebben, dus dat zou inderdaad beter zijn als iemand die Persisch spreekt daar kijkt. Ymblanter (talk) 13:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Вопрос

Вопрос можно уточнить. Пример, в викидате есть такой пункт с кодом P1449 - прозвище. Если прописывать его в рабочем шаблоне |викиданные1 = p1449 и он будет заполнен, то в статье о человеке если прозвище заполнено в викидате он будет срабатывать оттуда. Тоже самое с другими кодами p1477 - имя при рождении, P1813 - краткое имя/название ну и так далее. Теперь вопрос такой. Допустим в кодом P1813 - краткое имя/название, можно просто написать фамилию и имя без отчества, или если двойные имена или фамилии то тоже сократить. Краткое описание. А есть ли какой-нибудь код PXXX c полным именем? Я что то полазил и нашёл только этот код Q1071027, но он не с P начинается и прописывается в других местах. 94.243.59.138 11:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

По-моему, надо просто в элементе Викиданных прописывать полное имя. Ymblanter (talk) 11:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Это то всё понятно. Я к чему, очень явный пример у женщин. До замужества какая не будь Иванова Анна Ивановна, после Петрова Анна Ивановна. Как правило в шапке таблицы преамбулы принято писать краткое имя просто Анна Петрова. А вот уже в пунктах прописывать детали имя при рождении Иванова Анна Ивановна, полное имя Петрова Анна Ивановна. И вот тут у пункта полное имя нет кода в викидате, есть такие два пункта P1448 и P1559 но что то мне кажется они не совсем тут подходит, или один из них? Просто если полазить по рабочим шаблонам персон, нигде у пункта полное имя нет дополнения с этим кодом |викиданные1 = P1448. 94.243.59.138 14:54, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Я не знаю, мне точно так же надо искать, но, кажется, конкретно девичья фамилия у нас была отдельным свойтвом. Проще всего, видимо, пройти по тематическому списку свойств. Ymblanter (talk) 16:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

There are reliable sources for Joseph!

There are references and citations for the Joseph such as 2601:642:4C02:236B:4953:BDF4:DBFC:DF64 21:05, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Try to make a Wikipedia article, then we are not going to have questions here. Ymblanter (talk) 21:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Deletion of Q65588801

Why did you delete the data object Ajax Talententeam (Q65588801) on December 25, 2022. There was no prior discussion of deletion and the data object continues to be linked from other data objects. That's why I ask you to undo the deletion as soon as possible, not that another bot removes all the links. --Gymnicus (talk) 12:38, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, this is clearly a mistake, I am sure I wanted to delete smth else. Ymblanter (talk) 12:45, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Блокировка вандала и сокрытие правок

Добрый день! Если можно заблокируйте, пожалуйста, участника ZejMAX Special:Contributions/ZejMAX, весь вклад - это вандализм в описаниях элементов. Если есть возможность, скройте также его правки. Ksc~ruwiki (talk) 15:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

 Done Ymblanter (talk) 15:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Q56313749: Просьба

Привет, У меня просьба удалить Q12292366 и связать статью из болгарской Википедии с русской. Это название „плантаж“ по моему имеет смисл как изпользваемое чужое слово „риголване“ в болгарском языке. Происхождение слова от французского языка через румынский язык. Статья в Wikidata Q56313749 для „Плантаж“, а для „Риголване“ – Q12292366. Zelenkroki (talk) 03:54, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

 Done. Michgrig (talk) 20:30, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Спасибо. Ymblanter (talk) 00:29, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Тоже спасибо, Michgrig, спасибо, Ymblanter. --Zelenkroki (talk) 03:53, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Paraview main developers

Dear Ymblanter,

I am working (with a colleague) to add items for the main developers of ParaView (Q474635) and Visualization Toolkit (Q2307285), which are the base of many CAD and 3D applications.

Sorry that I needed a few days to add all the people before adding them as developers.

Please restore Utkarsh Ayachit (Q116465441) since he is the main developer with 3,186,591 ++ 4,154,906 -- loc – in the same league as main Linux kernel developers.

Kind regards Türkischer Cempion (talk) 14:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

I undeleted it, but the item is essentially empty. If sourced statements would not be added reasonably soon, it will likely be deleted again. Ymblanter (talk) 14:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Call for participation in a task-based online experiment

Dear Ymblanter

I hope you are doing good,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at King's College London, and I work on a project as part of my PhD research, in which I have developed a personalised recommender model that suggests Wikidata items for the editors based on their past edits.

I am inviting you to a task-based study that will ask you to provide your judgments about the relevance of the items suggested by our model based on your previous edits.

Participation is completely voluntary, and your cooperation will enable us to evaluate the accuracy of the recommender system in suggesting relevant items to you. We will analyse the results anonymised, and they will be published to a research venue.

The study should take no more than 20 minutes.

If you agree to participate in this study, please either contact me at kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSees9WzFXR0Vl3mHLkZCaByeFHRrBy51kBca53euq9nt3XWog/viewform?usp=sf_link

Then, I will contact you with the link to start the study.

In case you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me through my mentioned email.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.

Regards Kholoudsaa (talk) 19:52, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Редирект

Сделайте перенаправление с Q91099488 на Q14936781. Я вроде все конфликты мешающие для редиректа устранил, но все рано не срабатывает. 94.243.57.178 16:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done. На будущее хотелось бы видеть прямые ссылки на элементы, о которых вы просите. Michgrig (talk) 20:07, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Спасибо! По поводу прямых ссылок учту. 94.243.57.178 08:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Page Natalia Gavrilița

I wanted to inform you that you left the page https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q105193792#P172 , with a small mistake, firstly Gavrilița said numerously times that People from Moldova are ethnic Romanians : https://radiochisinau.md/natalia-gavrilita-am-cetatenie-dubla-si-sunt-si-romanca-si-moldoveanca-nu-vad-o-contradictie-in-termenii---145949.html .

Also I really hope that Russian Wikipedia will delete information propaganda about Moldova, because on all pages about our country you strongly affirm that we speak a non-existing language (moldovan) when we speak Romanian and it's official, furthermore there are a lot of historical lies for example that Romania occupied Bessarabia in 1918 even if there is a reunification pact which isnt even mentioned 1 single time in whole Russian Wikipedia..

Also every time when someone tries to change that he's instantly banned by different propagandists(Лобачев Владимир, Михаил Рус)

Thanks you and I really hope that message will change something 188.208.122.93 21:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

I have no relation to the Russian Wikipedia, but I will not let you vandalize Wikidata. Ymblanter (talk) 21:58, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

I understood,now ban me for trying to change disinformation from Wikipedia.. sorry for thinking that there are normal russians 188.208.122.93 22:09, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

I am Dutch, for the record. Not that I am so much interested in your opinion. I generally do not care what vandals think. Ymblanter (talk) 22:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Where did I vandalized something? 188.208.122.93 22:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

I am afraid if at this point you do not understand, you are not going to understand this. Ymblanter (talk) 22:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Редирект

Сделайте перенаправление с Q108793651 на Q110095605. А по хорошему наоборот, в обратную сторону. В данной ситуации, пустой слот создан немного раньше чем активный. Я не могу там много надо переставлять и удалять, не срабатывает. 94.243.58.221 20:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Крымские объекты

Здравствуйте. Один из участников регулярно с год удаляет Страна=Россия из случайных объектов Крыма. Отменять поднадоело, это как-то решается административно? Машъал (talk) 13:27, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Нет, но, так как Крым принадлежит Украине, такое только с квалификаторами. Ymblanter (talk) 16:23, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Теперь и коды удаляет. Машъал (talk) 09:36, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Заблокировал на две недели. Ymblanter (talk) 09:49, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Крым спорная территория, на этом даже в рувики сошлись. Michgrig (talk) 14:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

В смысле? Крым - Украина, а по мнению России - Россия. Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Ну вот поэтому и спорная, что Россия считает, что это ее территория, а Украина - что ее.
Например, в рувики есть специальный шаблон для населенных пунктов на территории Крыма с примечанием об этой спорности, Michgrig (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Ну, вот поэтому мнение России о Крыме либо с квлификаторами, либо с более низким приоритетом. Ymblanter (talk) 15:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

• Полагаю участник решил обходить блокировку и продолжать удаления. Чистка проходит ровно по тем же статьям. Машъал (talk) 08:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

   Done Ymblanter (talk) 08:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

• Полагаю, это стоит передать глобальным админам: массовые переименования также в каталанском. Машъал (talk) 10:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

  Да, передайте. Вчера я в крымско-татарском разделе откатил два переименования. Если человек не говорит по крымско-татарски, то не его дело, какие названия в этом языке. Пора глобально блокировать. Ymblanter (talk) 10:53, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Я просто не знаю, куда передать… И грамотно на английском не сформулирую. Машъал (talk) 11:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

• Здравствуйте. К сожалению опять то же самое, участник продолжает идеологический вандализм: Донецк, Луганск. Машъал (talk) 19:44, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

• User:Машъал changes the rank in the geographic objects of Ukraine to "Deprecated rank". Russian he changes them as Russian Deprecated rank to Preferred rank. Here is one example. He has been waging an edit war on these articles for a long time. --Yakudza (talk) 14:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

  It should be another way round. Ymblanter (talk) 14:06, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

  Actually, it should be normal rank for Ukraine and deprecated rank for Russia (I also added a qualifyer "claimed by" Russia, and ideally references should be added). Ymblanter (talk) 14:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Trigonal Tower (Thessaloniki)

Hallo Ymblanter,

ich hoffe, Du kommst mit einem Beitrag auf deutsch klar.

So, wie es aussieht, hast Du den falschen Turm erwischt. Was Du mit »Trigonal tower« angelegt hat, ist der runde Pýrgos Alýseos aus der osmanischen Ära. Zur Bezeichnung »Trigonal tower« passt das wirklich dreieckige Torbauwerk Pyle Annas Palaiologinas mit dem davorstehenden Turm Pýrgos Trigoníou etwa fünfzig Meter nordwestlich deutlich besser. Ich nehme an, dass Google Maps hier einen Fehler enthält. Bei Mapy.cz sieht es anders aus, siehe hier: https://de.mapy.cz/turisticka?source=osm&id=1082921039&x=22.9596401&y=40.6410517&z=19, bei Openstreetmap ebenso. –Falk2 (talk) 15:18, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Ich dachte Pýrgos Alýseos sei dasselbe wie Trigonal tower, aber die wirlkich nich dreieckig ist, Du hast recht. Ich werde das corrigieren. Ymblanter (talk) 15:22, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Danke! –Falk2 (talk) 15:44, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Schon gut, vielen Dank Ymblanter (talk) 15:58, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Request for deletion: Q110968865

Hi, this item is nonsense. It contains only random characters (except for the He label and a wikisource link, which were mistakenly added by a bot).

The item was created from the IP range 212.179.174.0/24, which you have blocked for a year several years ago.

Regretfully they keep vandalizing extensively, both here and in the Hebrew wikipedia. In the last day I reverted about 20 vandalizing edits from this IP range (and from others), some over a year old that have somehow gone unnoticed (and there were hundreds more, just from last year, which were already reverted by other editors).

If it is possible to block this IP range again, even for a longer period, it would be great. Let me know if I should request this in WD:AN. I'm in touch with hewiki administrators about this issue as well.

Thanks a lot! E L Yekutiel (talk) 06:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

I prefer not to do range blocks, it is safer to ask at WD:AN. Concerning the item, I removed the junk, now it only contains the Wikisource link. Ymblanter (talk) 17:22, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much!

But - is there any point to keep the item with only the link? (And the matching label that was added by a bot?)

I looked in the history of this item again, and saw that the link was there from the beginning, meaning that it was created by the vandal that created this item; should it be kept?

There is nothing interesting about the link's target; it's just the text of some random chapter in the bible (specifically, 1 Samuel 16).

Let me know if you prefer me to ask about this in WD:AN as well.

Regarding the blocking - no problem, I'll ask in WD:AN. I'll wait a bit though, to see what they will decide about this range in the Hebrew wiki. They are repeatedly vandalizing there as well.

Thanks again for all your help! E L Yekutiel (talk) 21:18, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

I have no opinion on whether the link is legitimate or not; if not the page probably should be nominated for deletion on its home wiki. But as soon as it exists and has not been deleted the item is legitimate. (It might also be that it should be merged to some other item containing the same links but in different language; I think the English Wikipedia has articles about every chapter of every book of the Bible, but I did not check this in detail). Ymblanter (talk) 21:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks again for your answer!

I guess it's my misunderstanding then...

The link's target page (in the hebrew wikisource) is definitely important and legitimate - there are such pages, as far as I know, for every chapter and also for every verse in the bible.

I just thought that there are no wikidata items corresponding to them, unless there is a special reason for them to exist (e.g., if some verse is the origin of the name of a city or something like that, and the city's item links to an item corresponding to this verse).

Since this page (with the link) was created apparently at random, I assumed that the right thing to do is to remove it. But if you say that even under these circumstances the item should still exist, then I take back the deletion request.

I will try to find out if there is another page with the same link, with which this one can be merged; and also, out of curiosity, I'll try to find if there are other similar items (for other chapters etc.) and what do they look like.

Many thanks again for all your help! E L Yekutiel (talk) 22:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

No, indeed, if a page exists on any project and satisfies our notability criteria, the item is notable and should not be deleted. We even keep the items where sitelinks have been nominated for speedy deletion and only delete the items when the sitelinks have been deleted. Ymblanter (talk) 05:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much!

Here are my conclusions regarding these bible items:

1. I didn't mention it earlier for simplicity, but the link's target page is actually a commentary page on the chapter I mentioned; it's not the chapter text itself.
2. In wikisource (hebrew), as far as I know, for every chapter in the bible there is a text page (let's call these "t-pages" for simplicity), and in addition there is a commentary page ("c-pages"). Both t-pages and c-pages are notable on wikisource.
3. In wikidata, there is an item for every t-page, and it contains more than just the wikisource link: it contains internal wikidata links, such as prev and next chapters, instance of, part of, and also labels in multiple languages.
4. For most c-pages, there is no corresponding wikidata item. There are a few, and for now I've visited three. One of them is the one I've reported to you, from which you've removed the nonsense labels. Another one was cleaned by others in the past, and I have cleaned the third. All three were created in the same manner by vandals.

So, I think that I know how to proceed from now on when I encounter more of these. With your permission, if I will have additional queries in this issue, I will refer them to yona b, who has been starting to deal with this vandalist IP range in the hebrew wikipedia.

Many thanks again for all your help! E L Yekutiel (talk) 15:04, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. Ymblanter (talk) 15:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Request

Hi dear. Please help me. Mohamadreza sadeghi item deleted. Please help me and re create this. This item Q117749810 and Q117744150.

Please fix this. It's person famous and have more reference Jack bros (talk) 08:05, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

I do not think you are notable for Wikidata. Ymblanter (talk) 08:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Разная культура

Доброго времени суток. Просьба объяснить лексическую разницу в оборотах "Culture of city" и "Culture in city", потому что к обоим вариантам прикрепляют русские статьи "Культура города" -- а вдруг это неверно и имеются существенные различия? 1а) Правильно ли оба варианта относить к метаклассу "культура территории" (Q19958368)? 2) Посоветуйте участника Викиданных, к кому можно обращаться по трудностям русско-английского перевода. Ыфь77 (talk) 13:22, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Честно говоря, я не вижу существенной разницы. По-моему, и то, и другое относится ко всяким культурным учреждениям в городе, culture of кажется правильнее. Ymblanter (talk) 13:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Спасибо за быстрый ответ, буду переделывать по единому образцу. Ыфь77 (talk) 13:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Need your input on a policy impacting gadgets and UserJS

Dear interface administrator,

This is Samuel from the Security team and I hope my message finds you well.

There is an ongoing discussion on a proposed policy governing the use of external resources in gadgets and UserJS. The proposed Third-party resources policy aims at making the UserJS and Gadgets landscape a bit safer by encouraging best practices around external resources. After an initial non-public conversation with a small number of interface admins and staff, we've launched a much larger, public consultation to get a wider pool of feedback for improving the policy proposal. Based on the ideas received so far, the proposed policy now includes some of the risks related to user scripts and gadgets loading third-party resources, best practices for gadgets and UserJS developers, and exemptions requirements such as code transparency and inspectability.

As an interface administrator, your feedback and suggestions are warmly welcome until July 17, 2023 on the policy talk page.

Have a great day!

Samuel (WMF), on behalf of the Foundation's Security team 23:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello Ymblanter

Hello Ymblanter,

First of all, I wish you a healthy and beautiful day.

I saw that you removed item Q113378606 because it did not meet the Notability policy. I am a long time contributor to the Wikidata Platform. I created the item. I was continuing to develop the article, but the article was deleted.

I respect your decision, but I need your help to improve the Article. If you can restore the content I will add Noteworthy contributions.

If you still think that it should be deleted after the contributions I will add to the item, I will respect you.

Thank you for your support and kindness to the Wikidata platform.

I expect courtesy and attention from you.

I will be waiting for your feedback.

Kind regards, 159.146.57.80 02:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

I am sorry but I do not see how this item potentially can become notable. May be you can create a Wikipedia article and make sure it does not get deleted, then the Wikidata item becomes automatically notable. Ymblanter (talk) 06:09, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello,

I respectfully appreciate your contributions to the Wikipedia Foundation. Thank you for your hard work and efforts.

While it doesn't matter if this article was deleted, I think CNN and its links are recognized by local country-affiliated media outlets.

Unlike many businesses on Wikidata it has higher quality links, Yes, there is no Wikipedia Article as it is a Local Business. If it turns into a brand known for its International services in the future, maybe someone can create a Wikipedia article in the future.

I respect your decision, but if you can restore the article I will try to add a contribution. If your decision is still the same, I will thank you for your time.

I wish you a healthy and beautiful day with your loved ones.

Kind regards, 178.240.5.240 22:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, but I am not going to restore the article. You are welcome to take the issue at the Administrators Noticeboards to look for a third opinion. Ymblanter (talk) 04:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Q117210288

Hello Ymblanter, I'm not sure why you deleted Q117210288. I was building a list of BRIT Award trophy designers (see w:Category:BRIT Award trophy designers) and had also planned to create the corresponding page on en:wp at some point too. (This is a yearly event that is roughly equivalent to the Grammy Awards, and the people who are trapped to design the award trophy itself are usually quote notable.) Did I get something wrong on the Wikidata side? Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 05:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

I deleted an item which was labeled a Wikimedia category. A category is an entity which can only exist in Wikimedia projects, and this one did nit. A list would not have been a problem (again, assuming it exists somewhere). Ymblanter (talk) 05:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

I see, the category exists but it was not added to the item. I will fix this now. Ymblanter (talk) 05:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

I restored the item and merged it to the category item, see Q116786653 Ymblanter (talk) 05:40, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm still fairly new on Wikidata. Appreciate your help. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 05:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Q89127676

Hi Ymblanter, could you please restore this item? IMHO it clearly fulfills WD:N #3 --Ameisenigel (talk) 20:21, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

I am sorry but if I restore it and she commits suicide like she already started to hint at the mailing list I do not really want to be responsible. You may restore it yourself, you are an admin. Ymblanter (talk) 20:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Ферран Жуджла

Здравствуйте. В том то и дело, что он родился в Каталонии, играет за сборную Каталонии, есть источники на украинском языке (и на русском тоже) с таким написанием фамилии, поэтому так и надо писать его фамилию на украинком языке. А как альтернативные - "испанские" варианты - Хутгла, и Хутґла. Но Jphwra кроме того не любит букву ґ (если исходить из его правок в элементе об этом футболисте)... PS. Если вы не в курсе - он в 2018 году без всяких оснований заблокировал меня бессрочно в укрвики... Блокировку отменили, его лишили прав администратора... Дифф с его невообразимо грубыми выражениями в адрес некоторых украинских википедистов, в т. и меня, вам и другим участникам я уже предоставил. Никаких извинений от него — Jphwra — не было... От того, что меня заблокировали в англвики - причём сразу бессрочно, без оснований - кто выиграл? Насколько я понял, вы написали, что это вы заблокировали меня в англвики. Но ведь меня блокировал администратор-нидерландец... Бучач-Львів (talk) 07:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

лишили прав меня совсем по другим вопросам, которые можна почитать здесь: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Вікіпедія:Заявки_на_позбавлення_прав_адміністратора/Архів/2018#Jphwra, не скрою был излишен прям с такими как вы и вам подобным, большая часть из них или блокирована вовсе или имеют ПО как и Бучач-Львів (это если начистоту). А не читать очередные манипуляции от участника, который преследует всех и вся как в жизни, так и в соцсетях и по Википеди. Плюс Бучач-Львів очень удачно обходит персональное ограничение украинской википедии продолжая войны здесь, проталкивая сугубо свои названия в противовес официальным. Я думаю время его блокировать уже настало. К тому на Мети его за такие выходки блокировали на год, в 4 википедиях он блокирован навсегда, сейчасв украинской википедии блокирован до января 2024 года. Хотя у нас в украинской википедии он давно заработал бессрочную блокировку, которую отменил администратор Якудза и которого сейчас за это пытаются лишисть прав администратора. Как-то вот так получается, не очень красиво, но думаю хозяину сей странички уже достаточно дали доказательств да и он сам видел вашу деятельность в подмене терминов здесь на викиданых. Jphwra (talk) 10:57, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

On hold

Hi Ymblanter, I have requested two Wikidatas for deletion who have made by the sock puppets itself for himself. He has added his personal information in all 4 Wikidatas and someone else Wikipedia with similar names to get fame. It's on hold but so kindly check it out.

https://wikidata.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Q114905590?namespace=0 39.34.176.134 04:09, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

https://wikidata.org/wiki/Q114905590

https://wikidata.org/wiki/Q119331657 39.34.176.134 04:10, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

I am on holiday now, and I unfortunately can not properly see Wikidata items from my ipad. It is safer to ask another administrator. Ymblanter (talk) 11:43, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Бучач-Львів

Участник продовлжает на собственный вкус менять названия статей в украинском варианте подменяя текущий на собственный, как яркий пример: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q10520, редактирование от 07:46, 27 March 2023‎. Прошу таки вас принять необюходимые меры административного характера для прекращения обхода персонального ограничения этого участника которое он имеет в украинской википедии (где он сейчас блокирован через такие действия до января 2024 года). Спасибо за внимание и надеюсь на реакцию. Jphwra (talk) 08:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

ˈbɛkəm [5]. [6] [7] [8] --Бучач-Львів (talk) 07:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

matronym, patronym

А в чём разница этих кодов P2976 и P5056? Ведь одно и тоже, зачем их два? Есть смысл объединить, или я чего то не догоняю? Оба кода: отчество и матчество. 94.243.56.217 14:43, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Первый относится к имени (то есть у имени Иосиф будет Иосифович), второй к персоне (у Иосифа Сталина будет Виссарионович). Ymblanter (talk) 14:58, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Special:Diff/1970600908

Hello, please explain why you revert my edits. Q4115189 is a sandbox which I was just clearing the sandbox. 132.234.228.187 00:21, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Sure, but anyone can introduce non-offensive edits to a sandbox, right? Ymblanter (talk) 06:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

User talk:Zubryckiy

I see you have already blocked him, I want you to pay additional attention to this user's compliance with the rules regarding edit wars that he transfers from the local Wikipedia to Wikidata. Jphwra (talk) 18:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Yes, I have their talk page on my watchlist. Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

in fact, he creates the conditions for a war of edits:https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q112464685&action=history, so react. Jphwra (talk) 18:23, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

No. Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Why? Jphwra (talk) 18:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

I am not qualified to solve the issue. My Ukrainian is uk-0, and I am not willing to go to the Ukrainian Wikipedia and to read long discussions to understand the issue I have zero interest in. Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Q123201062

Hi there,

Could you explain to me what the problem is? I think I've sent everything correctly. If not, could you explain how to do it to maintain the page?

Thanks in advance, D. De Oliveira SCR (talk) 21:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Have you read our notability criteria? Ymblanter (talk) 21:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Sci-Hub

Добрый день. Отмените, пожалуйста, последние две правки (от 3 ноября) в Sci-Hub (Q21980377). Для этого придётся временно добавить sci-hub.org в MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. colt_browning (talk) 14:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Я не могу подобрать формат, в котором добавить его в whitelist. Если Вы знаете, напишите, пожалуйста, тут. Ymblanter (talk) 15:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

По-моему, какая-то одна из Ваших попыток должна была сработать, а не сработала из-за того, что там было ww вместо www. colt_browning (talk) 20:29, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Спасибо, всё получилось. Ymblanter (talk) 20:34, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Добрый день. Добавьте, пожалуйста, в Sci-Hub (Q21980377) утверждения official website (P856)https://sci-hub.red и official website (P856)https://sci-hub.box. У обоих start time (P580)2025-02-14language of work or name (P407)multiple languages (Q20923490) (кстати, у трёх других действующих адресов на самом деле тоже multiple languages (Q20923490)). Для этого снова понадобятся манипуляции с MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. --colt_browning (talk) 16:13, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Кажется, я всё сделал. Ymblanter (talk) 17:04, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Спасибо! Почти всё: ещё поставьте этим утверждениям рекомендованный ранг, пожалуйста. colt_browning (talk) 16:41, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Я вчера пытался, система выдаёт ошибку, говорит, что не может быть более одного утверждения с рекомендованным рангом (хотя их там сейчас два). Ymblanter (talk) 16:57, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Хм. У official website (P856) действительно есть ограничение single-best-value constraint (Q52060874). Я думаю, оно не срабатывает на другие утверждения про сайт с рекомендованным рангом, потому что у них разные start time (P580), а у этих двух одинаковые. Но это различие чисто случайное, три старых домена ничем не лучше двух новых. Мне кажется, в данном случае надо сделать два новых домена тоже рекомендованными и игнорировать эту «ошибку»: такой вот редкий случай, сайт с несколькими равноправными зеркалами. Альтернатива — как-то выбрать один домен из пяти действующих и оставить рекомендованным его; тогда по-прежнему можно будет понять, какие из доменов действующие, но это будет сложнее (это те, у которых отсутствует end time (P582)). colt_browning (talk) 17:16, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Я бы, честно говоря, оставил, как есть, тем более, что эти домены блокируются очень быстро. Какие работают, можно, действительно, определить по отсутствию даты закрытия. Впрочем, почему нет предупреждений на имеющихся трёх сайтах, я не понимаю. Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Policies here about characterizing people?

Hi Ymblanter: What are Wikidata's policies concerning descriptions and claims about people, particularly living people? Is there anything corresponding to the English Wikipedia's BLP policy? A fast search didn't turn it up. Wikipediocracy flagged the edits here (and at English Wikipedia) of User:Tataral, from which I became aware that they had added "anti-transgender activist" as an occupation at J. K. Rowling, "handmaid" as an occupation at Amy Coney Barrett (that one in 2021, and it turns out to have been a title previously used by her church), and "fugitive" as an occupation at Vladimir Putin, and "conspiracy theorist" at Elon Musk. All of these seem to be politically biased additions—except that the Barrett might be replaceable by the current term—and I have reverted at Rowling, Putin, and Musk; someone else had already reverted at Barrett. Tataral re-reverted at Musk and we subsequently reverted each other another time. The second time, I noticed the English description also uniquely included "conspiracy theorist" and reverted there too. That turns out to have also been a change by Tataral, and they reverted me on that also; someone else has re-reverted, and there is the beginnings of a discussion on the talk page. I don't know of a way to get around the special interface here in order to leave edit summaries, and I don't know what the policy is concerning addition of such characterizations as occupations, so I thought I'd better ask an administrator and chose you as an admin with whom I am also acquainted on English Wikipedia. Yngvadottir (talk) 01:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. I believe BLP is a policy which applies to any project (I am not sure it is specifically codified here), in any case the edits you mention are not acceptable, and if the user continues they are probably in need of a block. Ymblanter (talk) 06:27, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Also warned the user. Ymblanter (talk) 06:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Кентуцкі

Здравствуйте. Зачем вы сразу откатили ? не понимаю. с. 3 Бучач-Львів (talk) 07:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

This is not a valid alias. Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Q123578911

Hello, I was about to add a source to this item that i created but i found out that you have deleted it.

What am i supposed to do? do i create it again 102.90.46.29 12:16, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

I do not think the person is notable according to our criteria. The easiest is if you make a Wikipedia article in any language and it sticks, we will get the item automatically here. Ymblanter (talk) 12:29, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

oh okay i understand what you said but there are item here that doesn't have a wikipedia page. An item don't need a wikipedia page to be here as long as it has a source and meet WD:N Dunjhoye (talk) 13:10, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Sure, just in my opinion it does not meet WD:N. Ymblanter (talk) 17:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

yes i understand that and i am not disputing that which i want to add source to it to make it meet WD:N but it has been deleted Dunjhoye (talk) 10:41, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

it need to be undelete before i can add the source to it, i am waiting for your response Dunjhoye (talk) 10:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

I do not believe the item can be notable. You are welcome to ask a second opinion at the noticeboard. Ymblanter (talk) 11:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

i don't understand what you mean by you do not believe the item can be notable Dunjhoye (talk) 11:55, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Let me put it differently. I believe we deal with spam, and your refusal to provide Wikipedia notability only convinces me in that. Ymblanter (talk) 12:45, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

First, the item is not spam because spam means creating an item that has been deleted repeatedly but that's not the issue here.

Secondly, the fact that you are asking for a Wikipedia notability instead of WD:N means you have another meaning attached to this because there are three option in WD:N and i don't think that has change Dunjhoye (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

I am not going to undelete the item. Is this clear enough, or should I somehow make myself more clear? Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

at least there should be a reason for it because i am ready to provide a reason to undelete which the item fulfill WD:N 2 Dunjhoye (talk) 19:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

I provided you with the reason, but you were not interested in listening. This is spam, and i do not see any way it can be notable. Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

i am not saying i am not interested but i don't get what you are saying and i am trying to understand your point here because i don't get how it is spam and why it can't be notable Dunjhoye (talk) 07:34, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

why you delette Q123784880

plesase can you check on this link https://www.wenaklabs.org/ or on facebook page also https://www.facebook.com/WenakLabs

The fact that an organization does have a webpage or a facebook page does not yet create the notability.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Deleted Item: Q123258850

Hi @Ymblanter! I trust you are doing well. Thanks for your work here. I noticed you deleted an item (Q123258850) I created last year. The virtue of being an elected representative of the Kwami-East Constituency in the Gombe State House of Assembly is WD:Notability. I can't remember if I added a reference immediately after creating the item. I have already created an item for the book that will serve as a source of reference if information about these elected members is not readily available online. I humbly request its undeletion for improvement by adding more statements and references. Kindly ping me when you undeleted the item. Regards! Atibrarian (talk) 13:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

 Done. No, the information is not there, please add it. Ymblanter (talk) 15:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Kind regards! Atibrarian (talk) 17:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. Ymblanter (talk) 17:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

@Atibrarian:--Ymblanter (talk) 15:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Ukrainian male given name

Здравствуйте. Наличие Q104868059 нужно для упрощения навигации для редактирования здесь, поэтому прошу не препятствовать. Надеюсь на ваше понимание. Спасибо. PS. Прошло более 8 лет после моей блокировки в англвики, к которой, как вы сами сказали, имеете непосредственное отношение. Понимаю, что я тогда нарушал правила, как я об этом и писал. Но... Поскольку эта блокировка - первая и единственная, я бы хотел добиться разблокирования. Поэтому прошу вашей помощи. Спасибо. Бучач-Львів (talk) 07:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

What you are doing is logically incorrect. A is an instance of B means every occurance of A belongs to B. What you want to do is that some occurrances of A belong to B, for which you need a different property (I am not sure which one, may be ask at a Project Chat). Ymblanter (talk) 08:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

For the English Wikipedia, just post an unblock request there, explain what the problem was and why it is not going to occur again. Ymblanter (talk) 08:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Если вы подкажете мне иной способ, как при помощи "одного клика" можна "иметь под рукой" все украинские мужские имена, буду благодарен. Что касается моей разблокировки, то я уже раз пробовал. Всё окончилось фактически тем, что меня "отчитали" [9]. --Бучач-Львів (talk) 10:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

I do not know, may be try asking at the Village pump. Ymblanter (talk) 11:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q3379038&diff=prev&oldid=2070293410???? Jphwra (talk) 16:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

I think Russian would be Юхансен, so it does not strike me as obviously incorrect (though the best practice is to keep another one as an alias). Ymblanter (talk) 23:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Recreation of deleted item

Hello and hope you're doing well. I created Q124325889 last night and tried to add anything it needed and follow the policies, and Bovlb said these Items Q123124297, Q123116207, Q124054830, Q124078367, Q124084973 deleted by Saroj and ymblanter which are related to the entity. And that was because of notability. I don't want to spam and create more pages, and I want to follow the rules and policies. on my last page ( Q124325889 ) I followed the First Notability criteria in this page which says : (It contains at least one valid sitelink to a page on ... Wikimedia Commons). also i read this one , but the only thing i dont have is Press Article. Which is mentioned in a APN press release, but not on any other Press. also have All social Media ( Instagram , Tiktok, Facebook, Linkedin, ...) and some of them have +1-5 K followers. This company has multiple offices accross the world ( Sydney, Dubai, London, Toronto )and their GBP. Crunchbase also available. as i see all notability criteria followed and these deletions are very strict and changeable. So i'm here to request to undelete one of the entity page, Thanks Faridzain491 (talk) 05:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

For the avoidance of doubt, Q124325889 had no sitelink. It did have a logo image (P154), which the OP may be confusing with sitelinks. Bovlb (talk) 06:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Indeed. I do not see any notability. Ymblanter (talk) 06:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

As i Remember i added the official website Chamagency.com Faridzain491 (talk) 06:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

@Bovlb@Ymblanter maybe i'm wrong, and confused with the "Site Link". but the fact i want to repeat it again, is that i just want to follow the guidelines, and please correct me,so i can fix the issue so can have the page on the wikidata.

As what i see, in the Wikidata:Notability it says if it meets at least one of the three criteria below and the first one says It contains at least one valid sitelink to a page on ...Wikimedia Commons.

I'm trying to follow the notability rule using this guideline. This is my Wikimedia https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cham_logo.png in the file mentioned the entity's Website. and i used that image on my Entity's wikidata page. also i mentioned all the entity's links, Website, Social,Crunchbase,... Faridzain491 (talk) 06:42, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Zubryckiy

привет. Обращаюсь на прямую через действия даного редактора, который проталкивет литеру Ґ, создавая конфликты в украиноязычном разделе. Убедительно прошу заблокировать его как минимум на год за такую деструктивную деятельность (в частности в очередной раз была изменена литера Г на литеру Ґ тут на викиданых в статье Силькеборг и таких дествий к сожалению скорее всего больше), которая проиворечит правилам даного проэкта. Спасибо. Jphwra (talk) 19:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Reminder

Hello Ymblanter,

Please remember Requests for permissions/Bot/GergesBot. Thank you very much-- Gerges (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Not even two days passed. Ymblanter (talk) 14:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

@Ymblanter, Last edited 2 days ago by Ymblanter on Requests for permissions/Bot/GergesBot.

I don't talk English well, I may have understood you wrongly, Didn't you say that you would approve the robot within two days, it has been two days (the time zone may be different from mine, So a misunderstanding occurred between you and me)? -- Gerges (talk) 14:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

No, it was less than two days ago. Ymblanter (talk) 15:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

P12540

Hello! Thank you very much for your help in creating P12540. I've noticed that I made a mistake in property proposal and I can't correct it on my own. The data type is string and it should be external identifier, so that the property is displayed in the lower part of an item page, together with other identifiers. If you could change it, that would be great. Thank you in advance. Powerek38 (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

No, once created it can not be changed anymore. I would need to create another one. I can create it now but do not have time to fill it in, possibly for a week. Ymblanter (talk) 07:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

No, I am sorry, I can not create another one easily. You would have to ask somebody else, I will really not have time in the coming days. Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Undelete request re Tani Dulay (Q125417714)

Hi, I believe Tani Dulay passes WDN2: "refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references." For example the Forbes reference which was "part of a series featuring underrepresented people making a difference." He won Entrepreneur of the Year at the Asian Achievers Awards: https://asianachieversawards.com/singer-kanika-kapoor-boxer-hamzah-sheeraz-and-nhs-heroes-win-big-at-for-the-21st-asian-achievers-awards/ . He is the CEO of a company involved in major regeneration projects, eg https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1546602/brexit-news-net-zero-green-britain-Tani-Dulay-Woodbourne-Group https://www.asian-voice.com/Community/Young-Entrepreneur-Tani-Dulay-leads-on-%C2%A313m-Midland-regeneration-scheme and https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-65418596 Piecesofuk (talk) 19:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, I undeleted, but this info must be added to the item. Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, I've updated and added references. Piecesofuk (talk) 20:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Great, thanks Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Q125302779

Hey, could you explain what was wrong with the page and how can I improve it to make it visible? I think that the article could contain promotional language, is that the case? Miczello (talk) 14:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

This is not an article, this is a database element. It does not satisfy our notability policies, and, to be honest, I do not see what can be done to it so that it could be kept. We are just a wrong platform for it. Ymblanter (talk) 15:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

I get it, however I do not agree with your point. It's a serious agency. They handle top, worldwide clients, have a lot of PR articles, and their founder (Christien Bouc, from whom the agency's name originated) is a well-known entrepreneur who has his own Knowledge Panel. I'm pretty sure it might satisfy the notability policies but what needs to be done? I'll be happy to provide more info Miczello (talk) 17:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

I am sorry but I do not see how it could be notable according to our standards. Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Q125421538

Hi, I created a WikiData for A7FL Cincinnati, one of the 8 divisions of the American 7s Football League. The goal was to trigger the knowledge panel to increase the visibility of the division and to encourage youth to take an interest in the subject. Do you know what else I can improve to make the panel appear? Thank you Miczello (talk) 08:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

The panel for the entire league is visible (Q26836804), I wanted to add its regional divisions to that. Miczello (talk) 08:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

I am sorry but it looks to me that you consider Wikidata to be a free advertisement platform. I am not going to assist with any goals associated with this vision. Ymblanter (talk) 11:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

I think you misunderstood my purpose. It's not my goal to do that. I want to create a page because I believe it deserves one. I'm quite new to Wikidata and I don't know how I could improve its quality, hence the question. Miczello (talk) 16:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Deletion of SillyTavern (Q126922503)

Could you undelete this? I dunno what the person who made the deletion request was thinking, but they seem to have mistaken the item as describing a website, which it clearly isn't. It's a piece of software, and a fairly popular one, considering how new the entire field it inhabits is. Its website is the least notable thing about it (they barely even have one, the most relevant resources of the project are their GitHub and their documentation site).

The item didn't contain references yet, though I just created it yesterday and intended to continue working on it today. Since it's one piece of software in a field that's mostly unknown to the general public, there aren't that many references to it, but this paper mentions SillyTavern as belonging to the same general category as services like Character.ai (Q115517493) and AI Dungeon (Q85738917). The difference being that SillyTavern isn't a subscription service or a game, but a piece of software that runs on a user's own device and facilitates the creation and use of LLM chatbot characters.

There's also helpful concepts that aren't on Wikidata yet, like the concept of an AI chatbot character/persona, that could help to describe SillyTavern and related items. I intend to work on that as well. --Veikk0.ma (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

I undeleted the item, but please make sure to edit it so that it satisfies our notability criteria, otherwise it will be deleted again. Ymblanter (talk) 21:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Anthony Taylor (Q4453759)

Hi Ymblanter, could you please also rev delete this edit which just occurred a minute before your protection? Thanks. Morneo06 (talk) 19:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

A quesition

Hello, fellow editor! I need your assistance with a question. Could you recommend a script or a similar tool that would allow me to add the same description to multiple articles within a specific category? For instance, I'd like to add the description "settlement in Banja Luka" to articles within this template on SWP. And there's a lot more work to be done. Thank you in advance. — Sadko (words are wind) 17:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

No, I do not know. Please ask at the Village Pump. Ymblanter (talk) 18:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Ty. — Sadko (words are wind) 23:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Q125191253 (aka. Benoftheweek)

Hello there, please restore this item Q125191253, this was a Canadian American tiktok influencer who gained millions of followers and founded out that this deletion was a mistake because that person meets the criteria of notability over social media, he also mentioned on various news outlets including Newsweek. hope this helps. Telex80 (talk) 02:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

I do not see how this person meets our notability criteria. Not everyone who is mentioned on the news outlets is notable. Ymblanter (talk) 05:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Here’s the article from JustJared Jr about him https://www.justjaredjr.com/2023/03/29/get-to-know-tiktok-youtube-star-benoftheweek-with-10-fun-facts-exclusive/ but it seem kinda notable but seems pass to the criteria Telex80 (talk) 13:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Another one mentioned him on this American website:

https://spectrumnews1.com/ca/southern-california/news/2019/12/02/tiktok-takeover--why-hollywood-is-taking-notice- Telex80 (talk) 13:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

I do not think this raises to the notability level. You can try Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard (giving a reference to this discussion) and see what others say, may be they disagree with me. Ymblanter (talk) 17:32, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Important question, please answer

Hello dear @Ymblanter

Please explain why you removed this item Q130365677 under the heading of not being noticeable? This person is an Iranian pop singer and has a page on international platforms such as Google, YouTube, Spotify, Apple Music, Instagram, isni, imdb, etc., and has an acceptable reputation. That's why I made this item with the utmost care. Please review and return it if possible. I am waiting for your reply. Thanks 4ipid (talk) 12:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

I am sorry but what you mention does not create notability. These platforms are all user-generated. Ymblanter (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Q131840106

Hello, i hope this message meets you well

you deleted the item because it doesn't meet the WD:N but the both founder of the item has an item here and one of them also has a wikipedia page which was linked with this item. doesn't that make this particular item notable?

incase i am wrong, i would appreciate your explanation Daremize (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

No, it does not automatically make the company notable, pls check our notability criteria. Ymblanter (talk) 06:25, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Upon checking the criteria again and my past knowledge and interpretation of the criteria, i still don't see how it didn't meet the criteria, i'd appreciate your interpretation and while at it, i want to add some properties like P973, P8060 and others Daremize (talk) 16:07, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

I am sorry but I do not see here a notable item. For the time being, I see spam. The mere fact that the item is mentioned somewhere on the Internet does not create notability, otherwise every single person and every single company would be notable. Ymblanter (talk) 17:28, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

spam? I did not see how this item is a spam.

the WD:N criteria 2 says (It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references.) Since there is a criteria that says this, i see no reason for your statement. Also, from my POV and understanding, it pass criteria 3 but you said NO which maybe right and you are also avoiding my question, do you have something else against this particular item?

just a question, No offence!!! Daremize (talk) 13:17, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

No, I do not have anything against this item except for it being spam and having zero notability. You are welcome to ask for a second opinion of course, for example at WD:AN. Ymblanter (talk) 13:30, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

okay, thanks for your response.

about taking it to WD:AN, i don't see a reason to take it there yet, the item was just created for the first time not that it has been created multiple times and i am asking for restoration to improve it and check it for the second time as the item didn't shows notability during the time it was deleted Daremize (talk) 20:03, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

I do not see how it potentially can be notable, but you can ask at AN for a second opinion. Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

okay, kindly help in doing that because of adding the discussion here and probably ask few administrator to chip in here Daremize (talk) 20:13, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Just open a topic there and give a reference to my talk page. Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

okay, will do that Daremize (talk) 13:36, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

hello.

as said on WD:AN, the item currently meet WD:N 3. so i believe the item can be undeleted now? although, i am unable to drop comment as the topic has been archived Daremize (talk) 12:28, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Let me understand this better. You took the matter to AN, got consensus that the item is not notable and should not be undeleted, and now come to me asking for an undeletion? Ymblanter (talk) 12:43, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

there was no conclusion about that it should not be undeleted, and there wasn't a saying that it wasn't notable Daremize (talk) 13:57, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Then we probably read it differently. In any case I am not going to undelete it, you would need to find another administrator. Ymblanter (talk) 16:33, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

okay, no problem Daremize (talk) 12:47, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your help with my bot

Here is a fake award: 🏆 David!! (talk) 21:04, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. Ymblanter (talk) 21:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Q132147203

Hey @Ymblanter The deletion of Mohammad Owais Khan's Wikidata page as "not notable" is a mistake. With a strong social media presence, a Google Knowledge Graph Entity I'd: /g/11wv0jn0wdl, and years of content creation, his impact in gaming and editing is undeniable. If Wikidata values digital creators, why was his page deleted? This decision must be reconsidered—undeletion is the only fair outcome. https://imdb.me/mohammadowaiskhan

I disagree, I do not see there even a remote trace of notability.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:52, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Deletion of Benjamin Maxson amft

This entry - Q131792135, Special:WhatLinksHere/Q131792135:

• https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Q131792135
• Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2025/02/14#Q131792135

You deleted it because you said it lacked notability. I disagree. Along with digital sources, he is also described in a physical magazine if I remember correctly. He is a marriage and family therapist in Dana Point, California. He never made national news or whatever is needed to make a Wikipedia article on him, but Wikidata isn't Wikipedia.

The Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions page says

Probably created for a promotional purpose. I am not sure that the databases listing him as a registered professional are enough to show the subject's notability. -- Wolverène (talk) 19:38, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Untrue, I have no relation to him and am not him. I created that entry because I was reading a magazine and that person stood out to me for some reason, so I looked him and and made that article/entry.

Looking above on this talk page I see someone making a similar argument:

User_talk:Ymblanter#Q131840106: "an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."

Benjamin Allan Maxson AMFT (Associate Marriage and Family Therapist) meets this criteria:

• Described by a popular magazine
• Databases listing him as a registered professional
• Official website of a group of therapists or just him (forgot which) describing him

Until now, I was unaware of Wikidata operating so closely to Wikipedia's notability standards. Wikidata's notability guidelines say they are intentionally left vague, but they should give more details like "not all serious databases for people mean it's notable" or "should be the focus of or detailed in a news publication" or "like Wikipedia's notability guidelines but a bit less intense."

I am annoyed by or don't feel good about this deletion. I wish I had downloaded a copy of that webpage before it was deleted. I remember working on that entry and not finishing it. If I had finished it I would have downloaded it. Since you are an admin, please give me a copy of that entry (JSON or whatever), I would very much so appreciate you doing that! I certainly won't recreate that page in Wikidata if your mind I still made up; in that case, I just want a copy of the document that I worked on! --2601:281:D87E:84F0:F9B9:8E99:FDC0:67B 06:39, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

I have temporarily undeleted the item; you can take the info. I will delete it again in about a week. Ymblanter (talk) 06:43, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks so much! I will be more careful or cautious with my actions on WD going forward. I am now more aware of what might get deleted and what is or isn't notable. (I never created entries expecting they would get deleted.) Maxson also apparently published scientific papers if that matters in regards to notability. Anyways, preliminary WARC files of that page:

• ipfs://bafybeicmcucpwn6y3cblyxcxmq6uv2lzm3zbjbzuot7efw275kdwejre2a/memento/20250218064809/www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q131792135
• ipfs://bafkreigtqelncenxcdqtn7gr7xyh5rri6m4x6xwqp7zugvnbg777gniq3a

--2601:281:D87E:84F0:F9B9:8E99:FDC0:67B 06:57, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

I am sorry but at this point I do not see any notability. Ymblanter (talk) 09:23, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Q31230

The page has been protected. Please add th:ชาวเชเชน--Sry85 (talk) 12:14, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

 Done Ymblanter (talk) 12:59, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Help needed for Q132201167

Hello,  

I am trying to add the description "2024 book by Chiman Maru" to the entity Q132201167, but I am unable to do so. Could you please help me with this?  

Thank you! 2409:40C1:500E:C16:C953:FED6:44B0:9D7B 11:14, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

 Done Ymblanter (talk) 18:32, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Deletion of Kendall Martin

Hi, I wanted to ask if it would be possible to restore the element Q125208144. It was deleted because it apparently didn't meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria, but I want to argue it does meet the 2nd requirement, which is "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references". Particularly, it refers to a Catalan basketball player who plays in the FC Barcelona Bàsquet B team, and is covered in many reputed sources: Marca, El Mundo, 20Minutos, El País, El Periódico, MundoDeportivo, 3Cat, Ara, Público, etc. Because of this, I believe said element should be restored, since she is notable enough with this coverage and, besides, it is quite likely that someone created her article on Wikipedia or her element again in Wikidata because of the already stated. -- Brunnaiz (talk) 20:27, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

I do not believe the item is notable, but at least it is not spam, and I restored it for possible additional discussion. Ymblanter (talk) 20:39, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey Ymblanter, Just wanted to say thanks so much for deleting both of those "Brand" items, I certainly wasn't expecting the main Brand one to be deleted yet, Thanks for killing two birds with one stone :), Your help is always greatly appreciated, Many Thanks, Warm Regards, Davey2010 (talk) 21:04, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Sure, though it seems it is not over yet. Ymblanter (talk) 21:14, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Deletion of Q130604728

Hello i just noticed that you deleted the page Q130604728 saying it doesn’t meet notability. I contributed to the page about a month ago being the person is an actor with Credits on IMDb and other sources. Just inquiring to find out why you deleted the page thanks. 伊丽莎白大声 (talk) 21:06, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

IMDb is a self-published source. I believe the person does not satisfy our notability requirements. Ymblanter (talk) 21:14, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying 伊丽莎白大声 (talk) 21:15, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Deletion of Q110408643

Hello there, I noticed that you deleted the Wikidata for Hermanos Colombian Coffee Roasters (Q110408643). The deletion request by @Davey2010, stated it wasn't used anywhere, but this is incorrect, as it is used and required by the OpenStreetMap Name Suggestion Index.

Whatisbetter (talk) 09:34, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Whatisbetter, My apologies I won't use that comment anymore, I meant it wasn't linked to/from any Wikipedia articles, I didn't realise it could be linked to other websites in this way,

I can't remember the creators name but there's a huge spamming sockfarm that are spamming random links to articles and one of these links were to the Hermanos Colombian Coffee Roasters website. As no Wikipedia articles were linked (and the URLs all seemed spammy) I therefore assumed this was another sockfarm creation,

Either way I believe the creation was to further advertise the company and wasn't created for the benefit of readers/WikiData users and ofcourse I believe it should be removed from that website too but yeah I have no objections to undeletion if that's what has to happen, Thanks, Davey2010 (talk) 11:24, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick reply and understanding. The entry was created specifically for the Name Suggestion Index, as it's a notable London coffee shop brand. Whatisbetter (talk) 12:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

I have no idea about the Open Street Map name suggestion index, but based on this discussion I will undelete the item. Ymblanter (talk) 17:47, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Whatisbetter, Many thanks for your reply, Ah okay I didn't know that, Thank you for spotting the deletion of this and for coming here, In future I'll check for this sort of thing before nominating and will stop saying "not linked anywhere" as genuinely had no idea Wikidata stuff could be linked via websites, Every day's a school day! :), Anyway thanks, Warm Regards, Davey2010 (talk) 18:16, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

You’ve got mail

Hi Ymblanter, could you check? Look forward to here from you! Wüstenspringmaus _talk 06:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Request for Undeletion of Wikidata Item Q133890000 and Removal of Unauthorized Entries

Dear @Ymblanter

I hope you're doing well. I'm reaching out to request the undeletion of Wikidata item Q133890000, which was deleted due to concerns over a few improperly created and unauthorized entries that do not accurately reflect Mohammad Owais Khan's true identity and professional background. The entries in question are:

Q133717746

Q132454858

Q132147203

These entries were created without consent and contain misleading information that does not align with verified and reliable sources. Mohammad Owais Khan is the founder of Vengstrong, a creative agency, and an active content creator on YouTube. It is important that his professional identity and public profile be accurately represented on Wikidata, with sources that properly reflect his achievements.

To ensure the integrity of the information on Wikidata, I kindly request that you consider undeleting item Q133890000, allowing me time to add notable sources and remove the unauthorized entries listed above. I am more than happy to provide any additional documentation or references to support the accuracy of the information.

I understand the importance of keeping data on Wikidata accurate and reliable, and I truly appreciate your understanding and support in this matter.

Thank you for your time and attention.

Best regards, VS0GT

VST0GT (talk) 16:05, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Probably a sock of V39G3/VS0GT who was blocked by User:Bovlb. I also blocked this one. Multichill (talk) 16:52, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. Ymblanter (talk) 17:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Talk

Can you give a reason for refusing to delete pages created by 151.21.86.164? Henrydat (talk) 21:12, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Could you please hive me more context? I do not remember this particular case, but usually if I do not want to delete something I just pass it by without making any statement. Ymblanter (talk) 07:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. I know. Henrydat (talk) 07:27, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Can you please restore deleted item Q134608865 ("ChasPik")

Hello. On 30 May 2025 you deleted the item Q134608865 ("ChasPik") with the reason "Does not meet the notability policy."

However, the item included valid structured data and references such as: - official website (https://www.chaspik.ua/) - Clarity-project.org profile - Opendatabot.ua registry - Facebook and YouTube official accounts - legal form, inception date, and headquarters

This company is notable in Ukraine, has wholesale/retail business across regions, and independent business registry entries.

Could you please restore the item so that it can be improved further?

Thank you in advance! ChasPik Official (talk) 08:20, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

I am sorry but I do not see how it satisfies our notability criteria. There are many thousands of companies all over the world which are in the official registers, most of them are not notable. Ymblanter (talk) 08:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Can you please restore deleted item Q134727536

Hello. Please can you explain me how it is not meet with the notability policy? I make a item about Bangladeshi Musical Artist Yasir Arafat Rahim. In item has media source, all valid links that proved the parson. How it is not meet? Zaliamvenue (talk) 19:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

You may want to read Wikidata:Notability Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Request to restore Q131387135 (Mickey Visit)

Hello Ymblanter,

I’m requesting the undeletion of item Q131387135, which represented Mickey Visit, a well-established Disney theme park news and planning website. You deleted this item in December 2024 for not meeting notability policy, but I would like to present updated evidence that better clearly establishes its notability according to Wikidata guidelines listed in the guide to undeletion.

I appreciate all of the hard work that you do so I wanted to give you all of the information for your consideration in one place below. I believe that the links and features by Disney, the City Anaheim, and highly notable industry and general publications listed below demonstrate the notability of Mickey Visit.

Evidence of Notability

Anaheim Tourism Bureau Press Announcement

Visit Anaheim, the official tourism authority for the city of Anaheim Q49247 that is home to Disneyland and the management of the Anaheim Convention Center Q4750878 and key partner of the Anaheim Ducks Hockey Team Q192751, called Mickey Visit the “premier Disneyland news and planning publication” and announced a wide-ranging media partnership. This is the official government funded bureau that is closely partnered with Disney saying that Mickey Visit is notable. This is a “useful in-link from another item that has unquestionable notability”. The announcement also includes this about information for Mickey Visit - “Founded in 2011, Mickey Visit reaches millions of Disney enthusiasts each month through its website, newsletter, and social media channels with the latest Disney news and tips. The publication has been cited by top media outlets, including The New York Times, CNN, The Wall Street Journal, ABC, FOX News, the Los Angeles Times, and Orange County Register, as an expert on Disneyland, Disney World, Universal, and cruising.”

https://www.visitanaheim.org/articles/post/visit-anaheim-taps-mickey-visit-to-be-chief-imaginagent-officer-for-imaginagency/

USA Today shares Mickey Visit Crowd Calendar as top resource

Top US media website shares the Mickey Visit crowd calendar resource is one of the top trip planning crowd calendars for visiting Disney. https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/experience/theme-parks/2025/01/09/disney-world-crowd-calendar-cheapest-tickets/77572609007/

Similar feature in Florida Today - https://www.floridatoday.com/story/entertainment/2025/02/06/spring-break-florida-theme-parks-disney-world-universal-legoland-seaworld/78080392007/

Mickey Visit Study on Disney Price Increases Featured by WSJ, Forbes, CNN, CNBC, Fortune, Fox News, LA Times, Skift, Variety, SFGate, and More

Mickey Visit is frequently called upon as a source of original data and insights for reporters covering Disney. Late last year a study was used in over 250 different stories about Disney price increases. As the notability policy for Wikidata states, this goes way beyond just being interviewed for an article. The article is partially about Mickey Visit as the subject of the pieces. The Skift mention is particuarly notable as it is one of the most notable travel industry publications and it owns industry research.

Here are links to all of these different pieces:

https://www.wsj.com/lifestyle/travel/disneyland-ticket-prices-increase-california-ec88084a https://fortune.com/2024/10/09/disneyland-raises-ticket-prices-2024/ https://variety.com/vip/disneyland-price-hikes-2024-1236177454/ https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/09/travel/disneyland-price-increases-finding-savings/index.html https://skift.com/2024/10/10/disneyland-increases-theme-park-ticket-prices/

Disney Experiences Q1431781 Website Featured Mickey Visit

The Disney Parks website featured links to Mickey Visit news coverage in their sidebar before they redesigned their “Disney Parks Blog”. You can see one news item listed on their sidebar as an example in this wayback machine capture. See it listed under “More News” in screenshot below. This fulfills having a “useful in-link from another item that has unquestionable notability”

https://web.archive.org/web/20230702055401/https://disneyparks.disney.go.com/blog/

Travel+Leisure and Over Hundred Other Outlets Featured Mickey Visit Wordle Game

After the success of Wordle, Mickey Visit created a Wordle game clone that was played over 1.5 million times. It was covered broadly. Here’s the Travel+Leisure story on the Mickey Visit game.

https://web.archive.org/web/20230605111151/https://www.travelandleisure.com/trip-ideas/disney-wordle-mickeyrdle-game

Google for Publishers Listing

Google publicly showcases Mickey Visit as a media partner, describing it as a trusted news and planning resource with over 500,000 readers per month and coverage across Disney, Universal, and travel topics:

https://www.google.com/intl/en/ads/publishers/success-stories/mickey-visit/

General News Coverage

Mickey Visit has been featured in many notable news pieces as a Disney news and planning website providing context for the news. See some of the notable features below -

New York Times - https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/30/business/media/disney-shareholders-proxy-battle.html Business Insider - https://www.businessinsider.com/theme-parks-not-accessible-larger-bodies-2023-7 Washington Post - https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/2024/07/20/disneyland-vote-strike-unions-california/ CNBC - https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/02/how-disney-turns-over-its-parks-between-halloween-and-winter-holidays.html ABC - https://abc30.com/disney-parks-world-disneyland-fantasmic/11849276/

Please also note that Mickey Visit is similarly or even more notable than another Disney news website with a WikiData profile here - https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q124659871

Conflict of Interest Note

I am affiliated with the subject of this item, but I am committed to a neutral and verifiable entry. I welcome community members to help maintain the item and will refrain from promotional language or unsupported claims.

Proposed Labels and Properties Label: Mickey Visit

Description: Disney theme parks news and planning website
Official website (P856): https://www.mickeyvisit.com

Thank you for considering the restoration. I’m happy to provide additional citations if needed and will follow whatever next steps are recommended by the admins.

Best regards,

Mickeyvisit

Mickeyvisit (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

I am afraid I am not really convinced, because these sources incidentally mention the website, not describe it in depth. You however are welcome to request restoration at the Wikidata:Administrators Noticeboard, either copying this discussion there and mentioning me, or providing a link to this page. I will not object against restoration if consensus develops that the item is notable. Ymblanter (talk) 17:54, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Understood. Thank you for the link and quick reply. Mickeyvisit (talk) 17:57, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

About the deleted item Q128131800

Hello Ymblanter,

I am Cenab Ulvi. While searching my name on Google, I noticed that the knowledge panel that previously appeared is now gone, and I realized this is because my Wikidata item Q128131800 has been deleted.

I understand that it's not appropriate for someone to create an item about themselves, so I am not attempting to recreate it. However, I do believe I meet the notability criteria, as there are multiple independent and reliable sources that have published interviews, news coverage, and profiles about me.

I also have a valid [IMDb profile]. Below are several examples of publicly available coverage:

• BakuPlus.az – Interview
• Lent.az – Interview
• BakuES.az – News article
• Manset.az – Coverage
• Habere Guven
• Denizli Yeni Olay
• Karamandan.com
• Murekkephaber
• Beyaz Gündem
• Marmara Gazetesi

If you believe it is appropriate, I kindly request you to reconsider the deletion or possibly initiate a new discussion regarding the item's notability.

Thank you very much for your time and attention.

Kind regards, Cenab Ulvi 94.20.98.64 22:23, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

This is quite possible, but none of this was in the item which did not show any traces of notability. The most direct route would be to create a Wikipedia article and may sure it is not deleted. This would automatically create notability for us. Ymblanter (talk) 05:54, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi Ymblanter,

Thanks for your response.

I understand that having an article on a Wikipedia project would be the easiest way to establish notability, but I'm not sure if I am notable in Wikipedia terms. However, per Wikidata’s notability policy, an item doesn't need a Wikipedia article to be notable. Criterion 2 allows notability if the subject is described using serious and publicly available references.

I now have several reliable sources, interviews, news articles, and an IMDb profile, that meet this standard. These were not present at the time of deletion.

Per Wikidata:Undeletion, new evidence is grounds for restoring an item. Could you undelete it so I can properly add the references?

Best,

Cenab Ulvi 94.20.98.64 21:56, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

We use the same notability criterion as Wikipedia. (We also use the structural need as another criterion, but it is irrelevant). I can undelete, but I think the item will be quickly deleted again as non-notable. Ymblanter (talk) 22:04, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

The links I provided are, I believe, evidence enough for my notability. As far as I understood, the notability criteria I had mentioned in my previous post is only for Wikidata, and not for Wikipedias, but it doesn't necessarily matter here.

I plan to add the links I sent you to the item after you bring it back, to show that there has been sufficient coverage in journalism. I would appreciate it if you brought the item back, I hope with all the necessary things added, it won't be deleted again. Thanks for your help. 94.20.98.64 11:53, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done Ymblanter (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Deletion page Q135426605

Hi @Ymblanter I saw that you deleted the DIGITALIA 21 page while I was creating it. Perhaps I published it instead of leaving it as a draft, but I was just finishing setting it up; I didn't expect it to be deleted so quickly. Forgive me, I may still be gaining experience, but I'm wondering if there's anything I can do to recover it and complete it. Thank you for your understanding. Gio Talente (talk) 20:52, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

I am sorry but I do no see how it potentially could satisfy our notability criteria even if fully completed. Ymblanter (talk) 20:57, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Well, Digitalia 21 has been mentioned frequently by Italian national newspapers. It owns a cybersecurity format that will be broadcast on Skytg24 under the patronage of ACN (Italian National Cybersecurity Agency) and has already contributed to the communication of the UN, the Ministry of Tourism, the Piedmont Region, MSC Cruises, etc. Gio Talente (talk) 22:23, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

I do not think this is enough but you can of course ask at the Administrator's Noticeboard for undeletion (mentioning this discussion). Ymblanter (talk) 05:24, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Reverted edit on Academia das Artes dos Açores

Hello. Could you please explain why you reverted my edit that removed the image from the Wikidata item for Academia das Artes dos Açores (Q62523026) without any prior discussion? Please note that the image in question does not illustrate the academy as an institution (the subject of Q62523026), but rather depicts the Convento da Graça building, which corresponds to item Q25420536. I would appreciate a clear explanation and justification for this reversion. Thank you. DiogoBaptista (talk) 21:36, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

well, you first remove the image which was there for five years without any discussion, and left the item without any image at all. (Note that you also removed all the files from the Commons category leaving it empty and thus amenable for a speedy deletion). The image does illustrate the academy, and having it there is better than having no image. Well, may be there are better images which can replace this one or go alongside it, but having no image is not the way to go. Ymblanter (talk) 05:37, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Request for undeletion for Q134466386

Hi @Ymblanter, it looks like you make the original decision to delete the wikidata for Josh Amundson on the grounds that he was not relevant enough. I believe he is relevant enough, what can we do to fix? 2605:AD80:B0:A170:D41E:4E76:DDEE:9572 16:47, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

I am sorry to say this but the item I deleted was spam and did not show any traces of notability as of Wikidata:Notability. Ymblanter (talk) 17:34, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

I am of the opinion that the page does align with the Wikidata requirement that it refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references.

The subject of the page is Josh Amundson who has a very large social media following, presence in news, and on Google.

Is there anything specific that was done or needs to be done to fix the situation? 2600:1011:B35C:BAA7:350A:C0F9:B445:1DE0 17:38, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

I obviously disagree. One most certain way is to create a Wikipedia article, if it sticks, the subject will be automatically notable for Wikidata. Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Request for undeletion of Q136350290 / merge Q136357020

Hello @Ymblanter, I believe you made the decision to delete topic Soundwave Art Q136350290 and I understand why as I was called away in the middle of creating it and had not included sources yet. When I came back it was gone. I created a new account (the one I'm on now because my other user name was associated with the topic) and I realize that was a mistake. I created a new topic Q136357020 with what I believe included the necessary sources and information but it was removed by @Bovlb because it was a recreation. Which it was as I was new to this and made the mistake of creating a new one. My hope is that my second one had the proper sources and could be merged with the first one and undeleted. Thank you for your time. Tram9980 (talk) 11:08, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

I do not think the item is notable, even with the new references. I do not see how even potentially it can satisfy Wikidata:Notability. You can of course request undeletion at Wikidata:Administrators Noticeboard, but the chances are not that great. Ymblanter (talk) 11:21, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Okay, thank you for your time. Tram9980 (talk) 11:50, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Q136433639 - Who can contribute if not just me?

Hi,

Regarding "Does not meet the notability policy", content was "x" and the only contributor was "x".

Who can contribute if I am the only one who can contribute regarding that subject? No one will wake up and contribute randomly on my project.

It's like organizing a event but you as the event organizer can't contribute to your own event. What rule is that? Myboostpal (talk) 20:43, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Wikidata:Notability Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Yeah, ok, I read the page, where is stated that rule? Please tell me the rule number.

The only thing that I could possible identify are the links added as described at URL (P973), as references where the project is mentioned externally but not content was "x" and the only contributor was "x".

If those references links are the problem, there is no issue from my part to remove them. Myboostpal (talk) 21:08, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

I am not sure what you want. I believe the item is not notable, and this is why I deleted it. The rest is a technical message which is substituted automatically. Ymblanter (talk) 21:10, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Mini Wikimedia Hackathon

Hi, we’re organizing another Mini Wikimedia Hackathon in Utrecht (NL) on October 25. Maybe something for you? It’s small-scale, technically oriented, and in-person. If this suits you, you can sign up via the event page Daanvr (talk) 17:58, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, probably not, but I will have a look. Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Ujawal Jha

Dear Ymbanter,

I noticed that the page for Ujawal Jha has been nominated for speedy deletion. I believe his page is notable and should be kept according to Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

His work has been widely recognized in various major media platforms, and his contributions to social welfare are well-documented. Here are some sources that support his notability:

1. Leadership.ng :- https://leadership.ng/ujawal-jha-a-story-of-dedication-and-leadership/

2. PM News Nigeria:- https://pmnewsnigeria.com/2023/01/07/young-nepal-social-worker-expanding-his-initiative-in-over-20-countries/

3. The Hans India:- https://www.thehansindia.com/news/international/ujawal-jha-a-young-leader-shaping-the-future-of-rural-nepal-971686

4. Space Coast Daily :- https://spacecoastdaily.com/2023/06/ujawal-jha-a-compassionate-social-worker-dedicated-to-transforming-lives/

5. BizzBuzz :- https://www.bizzbuzz.news/national/ujawal-jha-provided-free-medicines-to-the-devotees-who-came-to-mithila-madhyamik-parikrama-fair-1297994

These sources demonstrate that his work is significant both socially and politically. I kindly request that you reconsider the deletion of his page and restore it.

Thank you! Xooheemishra (talk) 23:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

is a notable social worker and progressive politician from Nepal, whose efforts in social work and community development have been widely recognized across national and international platforms. He has received multiple accolades for his contribution to society and has expanded his social initiatives in over 20 countries.

His work has been documented in credible sources such as Leadership.ng and PM News Nigeria, both of which detail his leadership in various humanitarian causes. Ujawal Jha's commitment to transforming communities through education, healthcare, and rural development has been acknowledged in articles like The Hans India and Space Coast Daily.

These articles, along with others such as those from One World News and Bizz Buzz, highlight his pivotal role in both social and political arenas, further establishing his notability in the field.

I believe that these reliable sources meet the notability guidelines of Wikipedia/Wikidata and would like to request the restoration of the page. Xooheemishra (talk) 23:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

I am sorry but I do not think these sources create sufficient notability. Why do not you create a Wikipedia article, make sure it sticks, and this will automatically justify having a Wikidata item.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. I understand that the page was deleted, and I will work on improving it by adding more relevant information and references. If there are any additional sources or information that you think might help, please feel free to share. Xooheemishra (talk) 07:06, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Deletion of Q134692940

Hello, This entity was deleted due to not being notable enough. I believe that it is notable on the grounds of the following:

This entity is the producer of a show listed on here: Show: Q136419496 Producer evidence: https://www.fuchsfinancial.com/fuchs-around/ I believe per Notability criterion 3, that having this entity makes the show entity stronger/more useful.

The entity is also big in the community with multiple postings of community involvement in social media and such where I can add those references with the restoration of it.

Thanks! SpiceDigitalCo (talk) 16:08, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

I do not really agree that this creates notability according to Criterion 3. However, you are welcome to either ask for a third opinion at Wikidata:Administrators Noticeboard, or, even better, create a Wikipedia article, and, if it sticks, the item will be automatically notable for Wikidata. Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Q136447136

Moved from Wikidata:Requests for deletions

Hello administrators, I kindly request the restoration of item Q136447136, which referred to the company AIDA-RD S.R.L, also known as Posiciona tu Negocio, deleted on 6 October 2025 by user Ymblanter for not meeting the notability policy. Since that time, I have gathered reliable and verifiable sources that demonstrate the public existence and relevance of this registered company in the Dominican Republic. These include:

• Official website: https://www.posicionotunegocio.com
• Verified business presence on Google My Business
• Mentions and listings in Dominican business directories and professional profiles
• Active online presence in digital marketing and AI consultancy services

The purpose of restoring this item is to ensure that the company’s verified digital identity can be accurately represented and linked within the Wikimedia ecosystem (e.g., Wikidata, Wikipedia, LinkedIn, and other open knowledge sources). All content will comply with Wikidata’s neutrality and notability policies, including reliable references and non-promotional information. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. Best regards, AidaPosiciono  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by AidaRD (talk • contribs) at 15:45, 28 October 2025 (UTC).

Moved here from Wikidata:Requests for deletions by me as undeletion requests should be addressed to the admin who made the deletion. Samoasambia ✎ 17:21, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Please read Wikidata:Notability. None of the things you mention work towards the notability according to our standards, they merely demonstrate that the company exists. Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Request for Undeletion of Item Q136374423 (get:traction GmbH)

Dear Ymbanter,

I am requesting the undeletion of the deleted Wikidata Item Q136374423 (get:traction GmbH).

I am aware of the deletion reason from 5th October 2025: "Does not meet the notability policy: content was: "get:traction GmbH", and the only contributor was "GettractionWikiInfo".

The core issue was the failure to provide reliable, independent sources to establish notability. I have now gathered the necessary references which demonstrate that get:traction GmbH meets the notability requirements.

Regarding the single contributor (GettractionWikiInfo): I acknowledge the conflict of interest implied by the sole contributor account. However, the notability of the entity can now be demonstrably established through the independent, secondary sources listed below. Therefore the deletion reason related to insufficient sourcing should now be remedied.

I guarantee that these sources will be immediately added as neutral references upon restoration:

Independent Sources Establishing Notability:

1. Meedia (Major feature article/Quote): https://meedia.de/news/beitrag/19483-quot-das-apokalyptische-bild-koennen-wir-nicht-nachvollziehen-quot.html - Independent coverage in the German media industry journal, quoting or featuring managing director Stefan Keil on a relevant industry topic.

2. BVDW Search Award (Industry Leadership): https://www.bvdw.org/events/search-award/ - Proof of leadership role through the managing director, Jens Fauldrath, serving as a patron/jury member for the BVDW (Federal Association for Digital Economy) Search Award.

3. webinale (Expert Acknowledgment): https://webinale.de/speaker/jens-fauldrath/ - Acknowledgment as an industry expert through the managing director, Jens Fauldrath, being featured as a speaker at a major industry conference (webinale).

Thank you for reviewing this evidence and restoring the item Q136374423 so that the references can be added.

Sincerely,

GettractionWikiInfo GettractionWikiInfo (talk) 10:00, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you but I do not think it is enough. You can try asking a second opinion at Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard or creating a Wikipedia article, if it sticks the item will be automatically notable. Ymblanter (talk) 11:22, 30 October 2025 (UTC)