Shortcut: WD:RFD

Wikidata:Requests for deletions

From Wikidata
(Redirected from Wikidata:RFD)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Requests for deletions
Items that do not meet Wikidata's notability policy can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions on this page under the "Requests" section below. If it is obvious vandalism, just add the page here (gadget available), or ping an administrator to delete it. Contact can also be made with an administrator in #wikidataconnect.

Please use {{Q+}} the first time you mention an item. Unless you use the gadget, please also ping the item's creator in your request (or ping the bot operator, when appropriate) if 1) the user is still active on Wikidata and 2) the user has contributed the majority of information in that item.

Please use Wikidata:Properties for deletion if you want to nominate a property for deletion.

Duplicate items should be merged, not deleted: see Help:Merge.

Do not blank items in anticipation of deletion. In particular, do not remove sitelinks, even if you have requested deletion of the underlying project page or if you think that sitelinks of this type should not have Wikidata items.

This is not the place to request undeletion. Please read Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion and either contact the deleting admin or use Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard instead.

More information

On this page, old requests are archived, if they are marked with {{Deleted}}. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at April 16.

Requests for deletions

high

~112 open requests for deletions.

Pages tagged with {{Delete}}[edit]

None at the moment

Click here to purge if this list is out of date.

Requests[edit]

Please add a new request at the bottom of this section, using {{subst:Rfd |1=PAGENAME |2=REASON FOR DELETION }}.


Walt Disney Animation Studios film universes (Q101099318): fictional universes of the eponymous film series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not really an established universe. There are some cameos, but not much interaction between properties (barring some specific, separate universes like Q7894222. --(Oinkers42) (talk) 00:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:00, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Trade We could use your input as creator. Is there outside coverage of this being a shared universe? --Emu (talk) 13:33, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I made this item specifically to connect different Walt Disney Animation Sutiods film universes to each other through P361. Trade (talk) 15:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Trade Yeah, I understand that, but is there a connection apart from those universes all being produced by Disney? And if so, is there a source that says so? --Emu (talk) 10:50, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No Trade (talk) 13:20, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: per reasons provided by RAN Jack4576 (talk) 12:56, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete For sure there's Disney movies that contain fictional universes, but calling them "universe of Disney movie X" or whatever is kind of nonsensical. Like item lists "Aladdin universe", but the movie takes place in the fictional Arabian city of Agrabah. Sure, it's a fictional city, but "universe"? No. Whereas the Great Mouse Detective, which is also on the list, takes place in late 1800s London. Again, that's not a "universe." Really, this whole thing is an exercise in taking the titles of random Disney movies, putting the word "universe" at the end, and calling it a "Disney universe." Which is clearly just non-sensical, unverifiable, and not what Wikidata exits for. What's next, a list of "Walt Disney Animation Studios film universe foods" that lists spaghetti, among other real world dishes, because of that one scene in Lady and the Tramp? Come on. It's at least an exercise in pointless minutia if nothing else. Although again, I don't think its in line with the purpose of Wikidata. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - not going to supervote by closing this as not done, but I think this should qualify as filling a structural need under WD:N #3. As I've noted in the past, we should air on the side of inclusion so long as it doesn't violate BLP and isn't blatant advertizing. Someone might find this useful. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 14:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think it can qualify as fulfilling a structural need if it's not actually necessary to store the data. Omphalographer already pointed out that we have other properties for data like this. If there is actually a structural need, someone should be able to explain what data this allows us to store that we otherwise can't. - Nikki (talk) 11:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    What do you think about all the one-movie fictional universes that are being created? Bovlb (talk) 18:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I think those are pretty unnecessary. Also, fair point Nikki (and Omphalographer) - on reconsideration I think I'm comfortable deleting this. No objections to fictional universe articles in general, but there should be some reason for them. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 04:41, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
81.233.91.76 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))
This IP has created many fictional universes over the last few days which I think are all or mostly Disney. I don't know how this relates to Trade's item, but it seems like something that should be considered together. Bovlb (talk) 20:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This has been open for almost eight months, and there are three votes for keep, and three for delete, thus no consensus. Therefore, maybe this could be closed as not deleted, considering there isn't a consensus to delete nor to keep? EPIC (talk) 00:01, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
RfD discussion aren’t elections, they are only meant to bring forward new arguments. Therefore, deciding them isn’t tallying the vote but rather weighing the arguments, i. e. deciding if any of the notability criteria is met. --Emu (talk) 09:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I'm leaning towards delete as some of the deletion arguments are quite strong, but also unsure as it might go under WD:N #3. EPIC (talk) 10:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Like Ajraddatz I don't want to supervote by closing without clear consensus, but I think this should be a delete - no sources listed that talk about this being a thing and I don't think it actually fulfills a structural need --DannyS712 (talk) 20:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also a little unsure about the actual structural need of this. However, it seems like a whopping 54 items link here - those will have to be cleaned up if deleted, but if it's not an actual established thing I don't see a problem with deleting. EPIC (talk) 00:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scooby-Doo location (Q111908433): location appearing in the Scooby-Doo universe: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merge with Q3895768 Trade (talk) 20:49, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We can’t merge because this is clearly a different concept. But I somehow doubt that this item is notable. --Emu (talk) 10:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
how about i switch it's uses out with Q3895768. Would you support deletion then? @Emu: --Trade (talk) 23:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Trade I guess? Those type of items are often problematic, see our discussion at #Q101099318. Might be a good idea to come up with some clarification of WD:N for similar artwork-related “in universe items”. --Emu (talk) 07:08, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Those type of items are often problematic" Please elaborate? Unsure what you are refering to Trade (talk) 22:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, for starters they are often under-sourced and thus relying heavily on the structural need clause which is arguably open to interpretation. --Emu (talk) 11:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dunno, they seem to be doing fine with sourcing to me Trade (talk) 15:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Years ago, items like this were needed to connect items of works and fictional objects to their respective media franchise. But ever since the creation of media franchise (P8345) (used in combination with from narrative universe (P1080), takes place in fictional universe (P1434) and/or present in work (P1441)), there isn't really any structural need for these individual "fictional X from franchise Y" items anymore. --2A02:810B:580:11D4:85C0:E878:CD68:A4A7 03:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q13668357: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Per [1], no such township-level division similar to townships (Q12809484) exists --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:23, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:31, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If it's something that used to exist there is no reason to delete the item. The located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) and China administrative division code (P442) of items in Q13668357#P150 would also have to be updated. Peter James (talk) 10:28, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Peter James Re-checked source for at least 3 times, there's no "12 01 11 402" entry, might be Zhemao's behavior afaik. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A possible source: https://web.archive.org/web/20151021230625/http://www.stats.gov.cn:80/tjsj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2013/12/01/120111.html Peter James (talk) 00:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
visited, and didn't exist too. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

London Buses route 409 (Q62018913): UK bus route: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This bus route doesn't exist, and never did. It's the exact same as w:Surrey bus route 409. It's just that it used to go to w:Fairfield Halls and Purley, before being cut back to Selsdon Library due to w:London low emission zone and other reasons. It was never owned by London Buses, only Metrobus/Southdown. Hence delete this to avoid confusion. Also, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/12/Category:London Buses route 409 Matrix (talk) 20:10, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's a Commons category but it will probably be redirected; the items can then be merged. It was not operated by London Buses, but seems to have been operated by London Transport. Peter James (talk) 17:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On hold pending result of CFD on Commons. EPIC (talk) 01:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge if categories are merged in Commons.--Pere prlpz (talk) 20:57, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

entertainment centre (Q5380480): entertainment venue (this item is conceptually vague and is proposed for merger into Q6770467 - see the talk page): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

This item was created by Sk!dbot to match a Wikipedia article, but Sk!dbot had also created entertainment center (Q5380479) for the same en.wiki article. The original sitelink in Q5380480 was changed to a sitelink to redirect. Q5380480 therefore no longer serves any structural need. In addition, the label for Q5380480 has been confused by a few Wikimedians with venue-related concepts. This has notably resulted into an unfortunate merger by JAn Dudík that has now been undone (details). Deleting Q5380480 would prevent further confusion with place/venue-related concepts.

Beat Estermann (talk) 22:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC) Beireke1 (talk) Beireke1 (talk) 12:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC) - collaborating with Romaine on Belgian data on performing arts venues. Affom (talk) 15:26, 12 May 2017 (UTC) Anvilaquarius (talk) 11:41, 15 September 2017 (UTC) PEAk99(talk) PEAK99 (talk) 20:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC) Boxomi (talk) 22:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC) Antoine2711 (talk) 00:19, 5 December 2019 (UTC) Fjjulien (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2020 (UTC) Vero Marino (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2020 (UTC) Bello Na'im (talk) 08:34, 24 September 2021 (UTC) Titanboo (talk) 17:23, 8 July 2022 (UTC) dlh28 (talk)18:21, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Cultural venues

--Fjjulien (talk) 16:21, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fjjulien: do you plan to remove the links, too? Over 50 items have links to this one. EPIC (talk) 17:19, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@EPIC The edit group by KrBot is in the process of being undone by @Vojtěch Dostál. Once this process is complete, I can take a last pass to manually edit links that were made since the merger and the edit group. Fjjulien (talk) 17:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@EPIC The edit group removal is now complete. I manually removed inaccurate P279 statements and reclassified P31 to more precise values. There remains three P31 statements as well as several categories. Fjjulien (talk) 20:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, great! Unsure about the deletion though, per Vojtěch Dostál. EPIC (talk) 21:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fjjulien Hmm, I am in favor of keeping this item because it is useful on items such as Category:Entertainment venues in the United States (Q7155494). Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 18:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Vojtěch Dostál I agree that these categories need to be linked with a Wikidata item. But this item should be a clearly defined concept, which Q5380480 is not: it lacks a clear definition as well as external links to authority files. I looked for a Wikidata item that could potentially act as a superclass for all the kinds of facilities (arenas, casinos, amusement parks, theatres, zoos, etc.) that are represented under this category and I initially found none. I then looked for closely matching concepts in external authority files and I found aat:300122263 "recreation structures", which is a parent class for all the kinds of venues described in Category:Entertainment venues in the United States (Q7155494). aat:300122263 already has a matching Wikidata item: recreation structure (Q85661503). The obvious and simplest solution would be to merge Q5380480 into Q85661503, wouldn't you agree? We can discuss the merit of this alternative in the talk page for Q5380480 Fjjulien (talk) 21:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kamal A La Prod (Q50338003): Kamal A La Prod is a French Music Producer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 00:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. Bit unsure about this one. Looking at his Spotify and Youtube pages he does seem to have a reasonable amount of listens/views. Still a bit unsure about the notability though as there are no site links and a lack of references (even though there are good identifiers) EPIC (talk) 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This one leans towards  Keep for me - page does not appear overly promotional, clearly a person that can be meaningfully described by available sources. Only issue is a lack of statement references, but that can be remedied. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 01:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Barman (Q109335259): Indian photographer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability --2804:14D:BAA0:93EC:35A9:F4FE:BF04:F2C9 20:17, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since he's a photographer for National Geographic and has a good amount of followers on social medias I would say that's enough for notability. Only thing I would want is more references, as the item has good identifiers but lacks references. EPIC (talk) 20:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added some references, it's from a wiki, but it's better that nothing. I don't thing it's company Q110477297 is notable. Fralambert (talk) 21:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Audiovisual documentary of Efik language (Q117749885): The audiovisual documentary of Efik language by its native speaker: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Posting for discussion, not immediate action. This is an item for a video that, so far as I can tell, has only been published on Wikimedia Commons. The video is not otherwise identified, and there are no external references. The video itself appears to be a well-intentioned effort to document a traditionally under-documented part of world culture. Does this meet any of our notability criteria? The same user has created many items of similar type. CC @ Olaniyan Olushola Bovlb (talk) 19:08, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I came across these a while ago and decided not to nominate them here. While I still think they are well-meant and also a representation of a relevant topic, which is traditionally under-documented, as you said, I am also unsure how these could meet our notability criteria. I guess linking them with the respective language is not enough for WD:N #3? --Dorades (talk) 19:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi@Bovlb, thank you for your observation and continuous contribution to improving Wikidata. Please note that we're currently working on a Nigeria Language Oral History documentation project aimed at producing audiovisual documentaries of Nigeria's indigenous languages by its native speakers to narrate their stories and using the audiovisual files to improve Wikipedia pages where such languages exist and donation for research purposes. Also, the project helps to salvage a collection of endangered knowledge with limited coverage in the media. So, each audiovisual describes an indigenous language in terms of history, culture, tradition, etc.; naturally, language is a notable subject and most times with an existing Wikipedia page in this case ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abi,_Cross_River) and Wikidata (Q3510527), however, instead of merging the audiovisual documentary information with each indigenous language they represented. We have considered creating a Wiki data item for each file to describe the metadata related to each audiovisual production.
Also, I have created a URL link to substantiate the notability of the subject referred to in the documentary. More importantly, i will like to know how best to incorporate this item in a way to create more visibility for this class of knowledge. Thanks for your understanding Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 09:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Does not meet WD:N --Ameisenigel (talk) 12:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

concert tours of Taylor Swift (Q104254982): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unneeded in-between step, making queries and labels harder. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 09:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It's useful indeed because it regroups in an unique instance all the subsets "concert" and "of Taylor Swift", plus it's not the only item of this class, there are other "concert tour of". It also has a related Wikicommons category. -- Blackcat 11:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sjoerddebruin:, if you've problems with queries seek for items which have 'Q1573906' as subclass. -- Blackcat 12:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a lot of other subclasses, the Wikimedia Commons category is already connected with Category:Taylor Swift concert tours (Q8832490). We don't have to make subclasses this detailed and complicated. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 12:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Absurd. Defeats the whole point of Wikidata. You could make a subclass out of any two properties. Imagine a subclass of literary work (Q7725634) "works by" for every author, or a subclass of film (Q11424) "movie directed/produced/acted by" every director/etc. Taylor Swift concerts are not distinct entities from concert of any other musician. Ignacio Rodríguez (talk) 13:27, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

David Isserman (Q122057327): American entrepreneur, investor, and philanthropist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears non-notable and promotional Jamie7687 (talk) 04:58, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominated one of these items for deletion below. As for The Explorers Club (Q2411202), the name is present in their list of officials, roughly the 30th name out of 50 listed — is that enough to establish notability? Because otherwise Isserman looks like a self-promoter without any substantial coverage in reliable sources, using sneaky tactics like abuse of ORCID and FilmFreeway identifiers (which have both been deleted/locked). Jamie7687 (talk) 07:22, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One linking item deleted; is the The Explorers Club (Q2411202) connection or something else enough for notability? Jamie7687 (talk) 05:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I have made a few changes to the item in case it is not deleted soon. I have fit the description to guidelines, removed an entirely incorrect identifier, and deprecated the previously-mentioned deleted/locked identifiers. Jamie7687 (talk) 19:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Sir David Isserman" no less — really? Ennobled by a pretender to a defunct Portuguese throne who bestows "Knighthoods" on American ecommerce entrepreneurs. Hmmm... -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 12:03, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Tomaszewski (Q120749475): Author: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. The "papers" listed on Google Scholar author ID (P1960) are only blog posts. Dorades (talk) 18:37, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:40, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Andrei (Q122923814): Entrepreneur, CEO and Co-founder of Big Interview: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 18:45, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep notable as co-founder of Big Interview (Q122916541) Piecesofuk (talk) 19:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Big Interview (Q122916541): Tech company offering an online job interview training tool and a library of free online resources.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 18:47, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Notable. Searching Google for "Big Interview" you'll find it's used by a number of US Universities and also Coursera https://www.coursera.org/biginterview Piecesofuk (talk) 19:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That a business or university uses a piece of software or webapp doesn't make it notable. The Coursera page looks like two courses on their platform. Not sure that any of that is a reliable source to establish notibility. -- William Graham (talk) 19:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Passes Wikidata notability #2 "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."
Other references:
https://careers.northeastern.edu/article/big-interview/
https://careerservices.upenn.edu/resources/big-interview/
https://eu.jacksonville.com/story/business/2017/05/16/work-wanted-big-interview-great-practice-tool/15755120007/
https://career.ucsb.edu/digital-resources-toolkit/big-interview
https://careers.usc.edu/resources/big-interview/
https://careers.umbc.edu/tools/big-interview/ Piecesofuk (talk) 20:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These read pretty much like written by the company, I think. Thus not serious, in my opinion. --Dorades (talk) 22:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the review in the Florida Times-Union (Q3520924) was written by the company. Anyway, they all show that the platform exists and is widely used and therefore enough to pass Wikidata notability. Piecesofuk (talk) 08:09, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Florida Times Union link seems to be a pretty uncritical listing of product features from a person in that industry. I'm not sure it's especially serious. -- William Graham (talk) 16:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
... they all show that the platform exists and is widely used and therefore enough to pass Wikidata notability. Where do you find this in WD:N? --Dorades (talk) 18:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikidata notability #2 "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references." Piecesofuk (talk) 18:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This very paragraph says that "serious and publicly available references" are needed to desribe such an entity. So just existing and being used is not enough. --Dorades (talk) 18:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've given plenty of serious and publicly available references above. Here's some more
https://www.vogue.com/article/job-interview-tips-dos-donts-advice
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/careers/career-advice/mastering-the-online-job-interview/article19626191/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jacquelynsmith/2012/09/14/the-top-75-websites-for-your-career/ Piecesofuk (talk) 19:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1 and 2: Not about the company, just quoting the founder. 3: A forbes list article of 75 items. None of them are serious sources about Big Interview. -- William Graham (talk) 19:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They all describe what the company is, they're all mainstream sources. I really don't understand what your definition of "serious" is then. Since Pamela Skillings (Q122923841) is notable and she co-founded the company then it also passes N3: "It fulfills a structural need, for example: it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful." Piecesofuk (talk) 20:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to argue criteria 3 for structural need. But in regards to what is serious source for a business, I would want to see either academic/scholarly works or journalistic coverage.
  • I would not accept things that are published by the item's subject or their employees. I.e. blogs and social media
  • Paid content, press releases, and routine financial reporting in the same category as self published works and aren't sufficiently journalism
  • Business directories and telephone directories aren't especially serious.
  • Similarly having search results (on Google, Bing, etc) is probably not enough.
  • For journalistic works, I think there should be some kind of reporting and not simple quoting of the business's marketing materials or attributing a quoted person by identifying their employer. Being mentioned in passing is probably not sufficient serious coverage of the subject. If the article is entirely about the business, I usually want to see some investigation or confirming of facts from sources that are not the subject or their employees. Journalism probably should include a manner of selectivity or editorial, i.e. an large or indiscriminate list of things is probably not sufficient (list article).
This is just my point of view and there have been other discussions in the past where the community has discussed what serious means and declined to try to create some kind of exhaustive list. A serious source can vary due to the nature of the item. See Wikidata talk:Notability.
Edit to add User:Emu/Notability#“serious_and_publicly_available_references” I think this user page, while not policy also has some links to how the community has considered things in the past.

-- William Graham (talk) 21:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your detailed response. I've always treated Wikidata's notability far looser than Wikipedia hence I would regard a source citing an entity's existence, as in for example the .edu sites and the Vogue etc. articles, as enough for Wikidata notability. But ultimately it's up to the Administrators what to keep and delete and hopefully they'll perhaps clarify in more detail what notability and serious references mean. Piecesofuk (talk) 21:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As an aside, I think a lot of Wikidata editors myself included, are sensitive to Wikidata accumulating tons of items on entrepreneurs and businesses (digital startups especially) that feel nearly entirely promotional. Businesses and their advertising agencies/SEO people create items with the hopes that Google will import those items into Google Knowledge Graph. Being in Google Knowledge Graph usually leads to an info box on Google Search results and they hope having one will increase their visibility to customers/investors. So when dealing with those kinds of items there can be an elevated level of skepticism regarding notability. -- William Graham (talk) 22:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kings of the Internet (Q121140391): TV series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Non notable internet series. All the identifiers are directories and most of the references are algorithmic articles. William Graham (talk) 19:34, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, I did not find any special sources to confirm the notability of the subject. --Wolverène (talk) 11:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Jayvee Enaguas[edit]

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 00:00, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the founder and creator here, but why are you jeopardizing me? - THV | | U | T - 00:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi The Harvett Vault, I have nominated these items for deletion because I think they do not demonstrate notability (WD:N) in the Wikidata sense. Regards, --Dorades (talk) 00:41, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I admit that they're partially redundant while letting them unlink. Man, for personal reasons, I'm getting out of my sanity. THV | | U | T - 01:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC); edited: 03:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Jayvee Enaguas (Q104434391) does not have any notable identifiers or references. The same seems to apply to the other items listed. --Haansn08 (talk) 01:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, The Harvett Vault (Q116372700) too. I'll see what happens when anyone gets them all vanished. - THV | | U | T - 13:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Janover (Q122522934): B2B fintech marketplace: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable company. William Graham (talk) 15:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should be notable, a quick search shows it's noted on Nasdaq as well. EPIC (talk) 16:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request Inyor4mr[edit]

@ Inyor4mr

 Keep Flashback (Q118869014) Autobiography of a Nigerian judge with Wikipedia articles should be notable enough for Wikidata Piecesofuk (talk) 17:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I had a look through the five Wikipedia articles for the judge. My hope was that I could find a section that I could make the target of a redirect so that we could add a sitelink to this item. What I found that none of them seem to mention any biography or any publication. Bovlb (talk) 19:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't find anything either. I added a Trove external Id and there's a couple of Library of Congress entries https://id.loc.gov/resources/works/2003050.html https://id.loc.gov/resources/instances/2003050.html that confirm it but not sure if there's an external ID I can add for LOC. I've just added them as references Piecesofuk (talk) 19:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Kabiru Ibrahim Getso (Q118396219) Looks like a Nigerian State Commission who has authored works stored on Wikidata so should be notable for Wikidata Piecesofuk (talk) 17:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I found Open inguinal herniotomy: Analysis of variations (Q37113597), Burden of congenital inguinal hernia and hydrocele in northern and southern Nigeria: an opportunity for awareness creation. (Q50188469), Assessment of blood lead levels among children aged ≤ 5 years--Zamfara State, Nigeria, June-July 2012. (Q34415506), and Prevalence and Risk Factors of Elevated Blood Lead in Children in Gold Ore Processing Communities, Zamfara, Nigeria, 2012. (Q51808861), but I cannot determine if the author of these medical publications is the same person as this "young politician in Nigeria". That's the problem in working with items that have no indications of notability: We simply can't tell what the item creator intended. Bovlb (talk) 19:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree the item's description wasn't helpful. This article https://thenationonlineng.net/335-tb-deaths-recorded-in-kano-last-year/ confirms that he's a doctor and a State Health Commissioner, so I assumed those journal entries were by him. Piecesofuk (talk) 19:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Katamba Abubakar Saka (Q115914660) Looks like he's a Nigerian University librarian who is co-author of works stored on Wikidata Piecesofuk (talk) 17:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Again, it's hard to be sure, but I'm moderately confident that they may be the author of Knowledge Acquisition System of Traditional Crafts in Bida and Gusau Towns in Northern Nigeria (Q106701951), so have linked them. I was not confident about Enhancing Research Activities of Library and Information Science Educators in Nigerian Universities through Utilization of Academic Social Media (Q106701949). Bovlb (talk) 19:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Northern Regional Library (Q115789016) Looks to be a public library in Nigeria listed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_libraries_in_Nigeria Piecesofuk (talk) 17:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a solid source, but I was able to add the underlying source. It doesn't really say much, and there is still no identifier. Can we find an official website? Bovlb (talk) 19:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Alache Ada Abah (Q115700036) Nigerian Librarian. Looks like she's the author of Availability of learning resources and students’ academic performance in Senior Secondary Schools in Kaduna State (Q106993737) Piecesofuk (talk) 18:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Ishaya Dauda Marama (Q115683790) Nigerian Librarian. Bio at https://blerf.org/index.php/biography/marama-ishaya-dauda/ and listed on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abubakar_Tafawa_Balewa_University_Library and author of Use of the Technological University Library by International Students (Q58574762) Piecesofuk (talk) 18:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Q111489203 is probably I. N. C. Aniebo (Q5557265) but the month of birth is different Piecesofuk (talk) 18:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A number of the others are Nigerian Academic Librarians who seem to have published works but I couldn't find them on Wikidata Piecesofuk (talk) 18:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Piecesofuk Thanks for your diligent research. If you're confident about associating these entities with the publications and the external bios, please go ahead and add them on the items. Bovlb (talk) 19:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Bravo Savings Network[edit]

Advertising. Doesn't seem notable. All I've found are press releases and sponsored posts/content. Italian company and the Itwiki page was deleted in 2021, see it:Bravo Savings Network. Creators User:8ShFr8 and User:Laurachi85 don't have edits on any other items but these. William Graham (talk) 21:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Murad Islamov (Q76368896): Soccer Player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability --2804:14D:BAA0:93EC:C190:C659:A82F:4EDA 21:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request related to geospatial neologisms[edit]

  1. Q122289565 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q121775261 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q122289565 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

The first two items are neologisms with not much if any scholarly or news coverage. Any users would be better off modeling as instance of Q580148 with statements describing the focus. The last item is a mess whose statements make little sense. William Graham (talk) 04:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Saif Eddine Regragui[edit]

  1. Q122389792 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q122416362 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q122416737 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q123363909 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Non notable solo film maker, his movie and his production company. No media coverage found. William Graham (talk) 04:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to add screenwriter for the movie that does not appear notable. --William Graham (talk) 04:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124311410: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notably WT20 (talk) 17:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If they are a sibling of Tadeusz Rydzyk (Q737540) I think it should be notable, but who the item is about is unclear. EPIC (talk) 14:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request Bamouzou[edit]

@ Bamouzou

I would  Keep those that are instance of (P31) canton of Togo (Q21020546) as they would pass WDN3. I checked the first few and they're all listed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantons_of_Togo Piecesofuk (talk) 18:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ibrahim Kumpulan (Q79460869): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doesn't meet the notability policy. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 17:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

123fleurs (Q26703844): French ecommerce company, specialising in flower delivery: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:35, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sari Yoshida Setyoastri (Q124366517): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet notability guidelines WT20 (talk) 08:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q119702477: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A couple of other websites mention it https://bougetonq.com/reussir-etudes-blog-aide-etudiants/ and 100K+ followers on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/rmetudes/ Exilexi (talk) 09:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q119702478: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought a registered national association, organizer of notable events (eg. Melee tournament at Cannes Winter Clash) and the topic of a radio interview, would be notable for Wikidata. I am not fully in the clear of what the notability criteria are and will comply with any decision, of course! Exilexi (talk) 09:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Exilexi It help adding references to the statements, such as reference URL (P854). Fralambert (talk) 18:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rédaction d'articles web dans une stratégie de netlinking (Q71143144): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, this was not published in any journal. Dorades (talk) 22:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipédia:1Lib1Ref/Univ. Eiffel/2022 (Q112180809): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 23:21, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SPINA-DI (Q124395025): static disposition index, estimate for the loop gain of insulin-glucose homeostasis: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? WT20 (talk) 18:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sterling Industries (USA) (Q124394788): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? WT20 (talk) 18:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The parent organization is notable, might be okay. EPIC (talk) 13:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They both are the same company! it's a duplicated entity! Sammysonic (talk) 21:26, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stratégie de référencement 2016 (Q71135987): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. This was not published in any journal. Dorades (talk) 20:58, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Record Union (Q7302845): Swedish record label: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rahm Khat (Q124395843): composer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? WT20 (talk) 05:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per IMDb he has composed music for multiple notable movies, so probably notable. EPIC (talk) 13:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Bagley (Q124395960): Australian Businessman: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? WT20 (talk) 05:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lucie d'Auvergne (Q124400156): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty WT20 (talk) 18:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Her spouse is notable. Might be okay as long as references are provided EPIC (talk) 20:14, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marcel de Monfreid (Q124400070): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty WT20 (talk) 18:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
His father is notable. Might be okay as long as references are provided EPIC (talk) 20:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See my comment here, I may have found usable references. –FlyingAce✈hello 17:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lucien de Monfreid (Q124400067): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty WT20 (talk) 18:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
His father is notable. Might be okay as long as references are provided EPIC (talk) 20:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He may be a hoax, as he is not mentionaled in fr:Henry de Monfreid. Fralambert (talk) 14:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fralambert: I've found the sons mentioned here and here, but I'd rather not rely on Google Translate – can you check if these are good sources? –FlyingAce✈hello 17:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

arrears annuity (Q122915697): cash flows over periods where the first payment comes at the end of the first period (as opposed to at the start of the first period): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 23:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notable in my opinion. Type of payment arrangement for an annuity loan, which is helpful for understanding the structure of annuity loans in general, as well as annuity loans versus other loan types. Some mentions: investopedia accountingtools Sauer202 (talk) 08:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Rumblesushi[edit]

  1. Q116816877 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q117313328 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q117765840 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q116816383 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q117843947 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q117075917 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q117813175 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q117313551 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q116948952 (delete | history | links | logs)
  10. Q117470272 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 10:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notable per WD:N. If you ask/aren't sure, write on Wikidata:Bar, not here. 178.37.205.142 20:57, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clever Gretel (Q19042715): English translation of Grimm fairy tale: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a specific edition of the work, it was just an unsourced text copypasted to Wikisource from somewhere. After it was deleted there, it can be delete here, too. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 16:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed, link removed. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 21:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brainware Analytics (Q124423758): Swiss IT company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotion WT20 (talk) 02:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yves Pernet (Q124426403): Flemish student leader: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet notability guidelines WT20 (talk) 06:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mátyás Bizzer (Q111704289): (2003-) game designer; amateur filmmaker: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability --2804:14D:BAA0:93EC:1D8D:FA75:8BB:6FFC 14:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MC Marks (Q124473243): Brazilian musician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N. Kacamata (talk) 19:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Three million followers/subscribers on both Instagram and Youtube, as well as 1 billion Youtube views, seems to suggest some kind of notability. But, I don't know how strong the notability is in this case, however. EPIC (talk) 22:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Preface and acknowledgements (Q73389562): scientific article published on 01 November 2000: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There's a genuine question as to whether this entry should exist: it's about a scientific article which does not, properly, have a separate existence. It's just the 'preface and acknowledgments' section that somehow got classed as a separate article. Note that the DOI is in use in two entries. DS (talk) 16:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Polish noble family (Q115867377): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. No links. --Heroldicas (talk) 09:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see an editwar between you and @Чаховіч Уладзіслаў:. Why do not you both discuss it here instead of turning it into a potential conflict? And please do not blank pages. --Wolverène (talk) 10:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing to discuss about. The user you mentioned baselessly tries to split one article into two. That's why I'm writing here to ask you to remove it and settle the dispute. Heroldicas (talk) 12:01, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have to protect the item for a month, because of the continuous edit warring. Heroldicas, it is hard to 'settle the dispute' if you are just emptying the content. In this case, only the sysops will decide if the item and its statements are really useless or vice versa. Could you kindly explain us which item may have a contradiction with the nominated one? Also, in this edition the page meets the notability criterion #1. --Wolverène (talk) 06:35, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Gurney (Q110439253): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted from all other Wikipedia projects Ravensfire (talk) 02:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Chapitre 7. La gloire du Petit[edit]

  1. Q75027719 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q75032109 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 13:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oliver Murphy (Q61716328): Founder & Managing Director at WeFix, a smartphone & tablet repair business in the United Kingdom.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails Wikidata notability  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Notable entrepreneur. He was one of the youngest contestants to receive investment on Dragons' Den. Plenty of UK local and national media coverage eg https://www.chelmsfordweeklynews.co.uk/news/10965969.dragon-invests-in-olivers-phone-repair-kit/ and https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/businessclub/10514549/Entrepreneur-finds-remedy-for-water-damaged-phones.html Piecesofuk (talk) 11:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L’assurance, moteur stratégique du Crédit mutuel (Q124607692): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 17:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yuriho Omine (Q123684569): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 20:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Kasper Nordkvist[edit]

  1. Q124208142 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q124451836 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q124209839 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q123524363 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 10:05, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fonts items are notable. 178.37.205.142 21:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marcel Terme (Q124666348): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, test Nastoshka (talk) 21:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Author of Le cinéma à Aimargues (Q124666307), but then all these were created by IP and have no sources. Fralambert (talk) 01:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

economy of Vestfold og Telemark (Q100868406): economy of the region: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Vestfold og Telemark county only existed 2020-2023 4ing (talk) 14:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When it existed it had economy. Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marcelo Wilkorwsky (Q124286548): Uruguayan entrepreneur, digital marketing expert: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

SEO person spamming for his SEO services DS (talk) 22:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This individual is a recognized figure, extensively referenced by a plethora of highly reputable and globally recognized institutions and media outlets, including but not limited to Forbes, MIT, the U.S. Embassy, and the U.S. Department of State. The presence of such authoritative references underscores the notability and significance of the person in question, firmly establishing their relevance and importance. There is absolutely no valid ground for deletion; on the contrary, the wealth of reliable and esteemed sources advocating for their notability only reinforces the argument for the page's retention. 186.54.239.184 13:29, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep

Dear @DragonflySixtyseven,
I believe the deletion of Marcelo Wilkorwsky's Wikidata item may overlook his significant contributions and notability. As an acclaimed Uruguayan entrepreneur and digital marketing expert, his achievements include the "Innovators Under 35 - Latin America" award, with coverage in esteemed publications such as MIT Technology Review and the IDB. His startup, Oincs, is a notable application in Latin America. The references provided confirm his impact and notoriety, meeting Wikidata's notability requirements. I kindly ask for reevaluation of this deletion request, considering the verifiable evidence of Marcelo's professional significance.
Thank you for your consideration. suwiki (talk) 23:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep notable 178.37.205.142 21:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lognoné museum (Q124623346): digital museum dedicated to old watchmaking and jewelry: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which ones? Could not find any by searching on Commons and by querying for SDC. --Dorades (talk) 08:16, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please, check the references : https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q124623346
https://www.wiki-rennes.fr/Claude_Lognon%C3%A9
https://www.leparisien.fr/etudiant/sortir/li-lognone-museum/
https://www.leparisien.fr/etudiant/sortir/rennes/eve-famille-lognone-de-la-course-a-l-innovation-aux-objets-d-art-de-haute-precision/
https://patrimoine.bzh/gertrude-diffusion/dossier/horloge/d119c787-f73c-4b34-b39e-560c74d6ac56
http://www.collections.musee-bretagne.fr/ark:/83011/FLMjo206889
https://www.pop.culture.gouv.fr/notice/merimee/IA35003135
https://assoce.fr/waldec/W354007784/LOGNON-MUSEUM
https://www.temoignages.re/chroniques/di-sak-na-pou-di/bourse-horlogere-du-pays-du-mont-saint-michel,107536
https://www.lesinfosdupaysgallo.com/2023/08/11/ploermel-appel-a-temoignages-il-veut-faite-revivre-le-passe-horloger-de-la-ville/ Kevlo007007 (talk) 21:55, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Most of them don't even mention a museum. Please limit yourself to the ones actually dealing with the item's topic. --Dorades (talk) 08:16, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The ones dealing with the item topic : https://www.leparisien.fr/etudiant/sortir/li-lognone-museum/
https://www.net1901.org/annuaire-association/ville/Dol-de-Bretagne,35095/theme/PRESERVATION-DU-PATRIMOINE,81.html
https://assoce.fr/waldec/W354007784/LOGNON-MUSEUM Kevlo007007 (talk) 10:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beshir Imanov (Q16819136): Azerbaijani colonel: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The article about subject has been deleted in Azerbaijani and English language Wikipedia due the discussion. Sura Shukurlu (talk) 14:22, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wang's News Talk (Q124527956): Internet News Commentary Group: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 16:38, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Demonstration after the murder of Alexey Navalny (2024-02-16, Vilnius) (Q124735501): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I don't think it's relevant for a separate WD item. A.Savin (talk) 11:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It`s separate demonstration. So it should have separate WD. PMG (talk) 11:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge it with Demonstration after the murder of Alexey Navalny (2024-02-16, Berlin) (Q124735497). They seem to be only one event. Fralambert (talk) 23:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Demonstration after the murder of Alexey Navalny (2024-02-17, Bremen) (Q124735500): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I don't think it's relevant for a separate WD item. A.Savin (talk) 11:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It`s separate demonstration. So it should have separate WD. PMG (talk) 11:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge it with Demonstration after the murder of Alexey Navalny (2024-02-16, Berlin) (Q124735497). They seem to be only one event. Fralambert (talk) 23:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boats on the beach at Venice (Q108176371): painting by Francesco Filippini: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item created by Lake Como LTA; there doesn't seem to exist a painting with this title Horcrux (talk) 14:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ping @Bovlb who deleted it and recreated it. Fralambert (talk) 02:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The afternoon landscape (Q108184575): painting by Carlo Bazzi: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I did not found any reliable source about the existence of this painting; the item was created by the Lake Como LTA Horcrux (talk) 15:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ping @Bovlb who deleted it and recreated it. Fralambert (talk) 02:42, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Najmeddin Shariati (Q124537966): Television presenter: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability and fake data --2804:14D:BAA0:93EC:F0A3:2F5D:8133:4384 15:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Habil Humbatov (Q95428917): International master of sports, honored coach: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N, created by promotion-only account Nemoralis (talk) 18:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:41, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete. --Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 04:50, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment A sitelink (nominated for deletion) exists. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 19:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vinness A. Ollervides (Q104211529): Political activist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promoting. The dewiki(deleted), jawiki, zhwiki(deleted) and wikidata item are all created by same user IDERJEN. --Akishima Yuka (talk) 01:42, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, the person is a completely hoax. His birth name is Wu Dizhao, later changed to some Manchuria imperial surname Yi, and contacted as many as possible medium to report, and cover himself. All is fake. Akishima Yuka (talk) 01:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold A sitelink exists there. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

region of Western Sahara (Q123689937): A region of Western Sahara: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is not a real administrative entity (established by a State or a recognized institution). There are no recognized entities that should have this instance, except the ones established by the Moroccan State, which should have region of Morocco (Q845643). The disputed nature of the entities where region of Western Sahara (Q123689937) is used (Laâyoune-Sakia El Hamra (Q19951088) and Dakhla-Oued Ed-Dahab (Q21235104)), can be expressed through other properties. --Ideophagous (talk) 00:43, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:51, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep it's both a geographic region of Western Sahara (this is a fact) and a claimed "administrative entity" that covers what is claimed and occupied by Morocco as well as the liberated territories that are under the control of another state. The OP is aware that this has been discussed at length on the admin's board, so this nomination makes no sense. I will ping Koavf who is familiar with the mentioned discussion. M.Bitton (talk) 03:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Leaning to keep as there is no reason why this has to be regions of Morocco's occupation in Western Sahara, but regions of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic in Western Sahara. —Justin (koavf)TCM 03:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf In which database or administrative system is this concept used or defined? If it's not formally defined in such a system, then it's not an administrative territorial entity (Q56061). Note the description: territorial entity for administration purposes, with or without its own local government, as well as the property part of (P361) => hierarchy of administrative territorial entities (Q4057633). You could argue for "geographic region of Western Sahara", but it's pointless to have this item only for two entities, when the same idea can be captured by simply using location properties and such. Furthermore, the two aformentioned regions are only defined with their names and borders within the Moroccan administrative system. Is SADR officially dividing Western Sahara in the exact same way with the same borders and names? Ideophagous (talk) 09:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They are not. —Justin (koavf)TCM 09:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see no point in repeating what was discussed ad nauseam, including on the admin's board. M.Bitton (talk) 00:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander D. Henderson, III (Q93303092): American business leader, financier, and Air Force officer (1924-2020): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

An entry that originated from a non-notable subject on enWiki that has since been deleted https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alexander_D._Henderson_III --Graywalls (talk) 00:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They're all linked from entries created by one user who created a walled garden of things about his family tree. Graywalls (talk) 01:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia Ford Crass (Q91949506): American artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted specifically for failing notability on en.wiki. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Patricia_Ford_Crass --Graywalls (talk) 00:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They're all linked from entries created by one user who created a walled garden of things about his family tree. Graywalls (talk) 01:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This item is also part of the metadata of a number of images on Wikimedia Commons:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/entity/M89038881, https://commons.wikimedia.org/entity/M89487501, https://commons.wikimedia.org/entity/M89507260, https://commons.wikimedia.org/entity/M90553347, https://commons.wikimedia.org/entity/M109289544 Piecesofuk (talk) 07:31, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alice Dawson-Damer (Q76236360): (born 2004): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This page is about me. I did not give permission for it. I have removed the properties, but would like the page removed. --203.153.206.214 02:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:51, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't blank the item. If you think that this item violate our Living people policy, you should proably contact a oversight. Fralambert (talk) 22:08, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The issue is that this person is apparently a member of the British peerage, such that a very detailed and exhaustive listing would include her name. If this entry were to be deleted, I find it plausible that it would be created again, by some completionist who decided "oh, she's in the peerage, we should have an entry on her". As long as "is a member of the peerage" is sufficient to justify an entry, it doesn't matter whether this entry is deleted, because someone will eventually write it again. DS (talk) 01:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Her father is the heir apparent of the current w:Earl of Portarlington. She is not mentioned on that page.--Auric (talk) 23:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless, she's in ThePeerage.com. If this entry is deleted, I won't be the one to re-create it, but will someone else? DS (talk) 17:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are links from two items, but no Wikipedia article for either (or for the current Earl of Portarlington, only a redirect to the title). A member of the peerage would be notable, but ThePeerage.com includes many other people, usually related to members of the peerage. It is also not a reliable source (it is deprecated in Wikipedia, and at least one hoax article in Wikipedia had a second Wikidata item based on an entry there). Missing entries from some databases should be added again, but this is expected to be always incomplete (Q21873886) and is not a Wikidata property for an identifier that suggests notability (Q62589316). I noticed DoBIH Number (P6515) is a Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320) as it's a self-published source - should The Peerage person ID (P4638) have the same, for the reasons we have a Wikidata:Living people policy, whereas the DoBIH is a database of hills, almost all of which will be notable? Peter James (talk) 23:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a self-published source, we should at least add Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320) to the property. This is not as important as a biographical dictionary (Q1787111) who all entries have the possibility to be a article on Wikipedia. Fralambert (talk) 01:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just a reminder that we have a warning template for editors who blank items. Bovlb (talk) 21:33, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yuka Estrada (Q120229700): American illustration editor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This individual is one of the named contributors to Climate Change 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change (Q60451191), though as there the author is given as Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Q171183) I'm not sure how to add the individual authors. I'll ask at Wikidata:WikiProject Climate Change how this should be done. Dsp13 (talk) 12:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Friends with the Weather[edit]

  1. Q110400029 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q110399544 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Fellly[edit]

  1. Q124327233 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q124328366 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q124328061 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q124328282 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q124328559 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q124691082 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 10:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tanzir Islam Britto (Q117840901): Bangladeshi physician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable person, previously deleted item Bodhisattwa (talk) 08:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2024/02/20#Q117840901

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2024/01/28#Q124269284
You can read both discussions. One Hundred Years of Solitude (talk) 22:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC) Sock of Tanzir Islam Britto, see Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tanzir Islam Britto.[reply]

*:It's very confusing because facts and sources have now become invalid. I am writing a research article on Wikipedia and its management process. I discussed banning and blocking. In more than 60% of cases, a user loses his/her access just because of a guess. And there are no standard criteria for credibility. If an admin says something is not credible, it gets deleted. its just facts; do not get angry with me. I do not have any financial gain from wikis. I am doing research, and as a PhD student, I found this sector interesting. And Google heavily depends on this foundation. So, few people regulate, which will come first on the Google pages. One Hundred Years of Solitude (talk) 18:10, 16 March 2024 (UTC) Sock of Tanzir Islam Britto, see Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tanzir Islam Britto.[reply]

 Keep
Speculation and suspicion..... Why? Why complicate things, life by doing these...... I said I took his photo. He is my Brother. We now have no communication due to some legal issues. Our inlaws are fighting with each other and my parents. I am feeling so ashamed that I had to disclose so many private things about my and my brother's life.
My brother is a fighter. He wrote books, got the job he loved, he became a physician, trained outside, worked with various castes and religions of people. In Fought with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. If is is not the hero, notable, i do not know who is.
He survived cancer, he fought, got chemotherapy, bone marrow transplant. He survived. He picked up his book, he vomited, then again picked up text books, kept doing that, cause in his CV line, chemo was running.
He passed the Secondary and Higher secondary school certificate exam, without any coaching, tutour, nothing. He just kept reading. The goal was fixed, to be a Doctor.
He became one. I know he is not credible, because his work is not published in the Guardian, Times. He is not a rich youtuber or ambani. He just saves lives everyday, that's all.
My brother is a cheerful man, he got married, and now he is facing divorce. so, during this time, he thought, let's get busy with something purposeful.
He only wanted to write. He created wikidata entry, he thought its like Facebook or linkedin. He created multiple accounts because he thought it was ISP's problem. That id is gone. And few he opened because of fun.
Yeah, he is now a sock. I am not defending him. But as a human being, after watching all these, anyone wants that the story should be heard. Millions of children who hasCancer will get the strength.
No, we will not talk about that. we will talk about duck, sock, ban, block.
I am ready, harsh words, block, ban..... but truth will always be the truth.
I live on the 4th floor.
My brother is on the 2nd floor.
We have the same router.
I apologize for this tone. He is an introvert, very shy. He will accept anything. He is a positive person. I am sorry that he messed up your site.
P:S: By Court, my parents separated everything between us, with one condition. My inlaws and I must not have any contact with my brother…… and yeah, it's Bangladesh, we value our marriage and society, we even give up our brother to save those.
But he did not. He got separated, Got accepted for MRCP part-1, he lives with my parents, i come and go….. He goes to hospital at 6:00 am, sometimes at 1:00am at night he comes back, sometimes after 1-2 days. We have 0 connection between us.
Except the router and some ids which are now I do not know where. We used to edit,create pages like back 2009-10, my brother became so interested that he went insane. He sat with a dictionary, and tried to find which words has no article.
But he relapsed…..again he fought.
Anyways, I am a trainee in Dhaka Medical College. Yeah, I am also….. But please, do not speculate, suspect. It's so sad…..
Now decide guys, erase him? The bad person he is…..or let people know, you can be anything, you can fight like hell, like this man…..
P:S: My brother is in the hospital right now. He has no idea about these. I know you will prove ip, tools etc….. But yes, he is a fighter. Thats all. History will tell his tale….. Omadacycline (talk) 12:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC) Sock of Tanzir Islam Britto, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/সিডাটিভ হিপনোটিক্স/Archive, Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tanzir Islam Britto[reply]
 Keep
Published Author
1.A Systematic Review on Childhood Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: An Overlooked Phenomenon in the Health and Research Sector of Bangladesh.[1]
2.A Systematic Review of Pediatric Dialysis in Asia: Unveiling Demographic Trends, Clinical Representation, and Outcomes.[2]
3. Association of Ventricular Extension and Short Term Outcome in Primary Intracerebral Haemorrhage. [3]
He is pretty famous in Bangladesh. One Hundred Years of Solitude (talk) 23:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC) Sock of Tanzir Islam Britto, see Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tanzir Islam Britto.[reply]

Tarkhan Pashazade (Q50415866): Photographer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. --Gadir (talk) 04:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Larvor (Q61943628): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Hopala! (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nieuwendijk (Q86819658): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No identifying data, this could be about anyone with the last-name Nieuwendijk, and there are many. I am sorry, that some organization in my country dumped a lot of shit on Wikidata, this is clearly not according to wikidara rules. Paulbe (talk) 01:07, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ Paulbe: please do not modify items before nominating for deletion. we need to look at the item in its original state BrokenSegue (talk) 03:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The property proposal says "eventually complete" and deleting items conflicts with that. Peter James (talk) 12:20, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is the author of the slide show 'DE NEDERLANDSE MUSEA EN HUN ONTSTAAN.' created in 1950. According to the museum of world cultures Nieuwendijk is the photographer of the slides and the publisher. This work is in the collection of Museum of Worls Cultures and has an persistent identifier https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11840/pi63487 with a backlink to Wikidata. More information about this person is unfortunately not known yet online but could be available in the future. Hannolans (talk) 23:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bijan Alizadehfard (Q124987813): Entrepreneur and Business Magnet on Blockchain Ecosystem. CEO of Phoenix Group: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Lymantria (talk) 06:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a reaction by the item creator at my user talk. --Lymantria (talk) 07:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coinbase Pro (Q125054329): sunset cryptocurrency trading platform operated by Coinbase: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:17, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a notable product of Coinbase, described at various points in the Coinbase article.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coinbase#:~:text=cryptocurrencies%5B38%5D-,Coinbase%20Pro,-%2C%20a%20professional%20asset Iamcarbon (talk) 19:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Iamcarbon Just because it’s a product of something it cannot stand on its own for an article. Especially with crypto as it’s only an algorithm that will be replaced within days or weeks. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 01:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This was a cryptocurrency trading platform operated continuously by a Fortune 500 company (Coinbase) under various names (GDAX, Coinbase Pro, and now Coinbase Advanced Trade) since 2015 -- and responsible for a notable percentage of cryptocurrency trading volume. I think this gives it more notability than an algorithm. Iamcarbon (talk) 02:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for adding references. Unfortunately I can't really judge their seriousness. --Dorades (talk) 13:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've added an one additional reference to the Wall Street Journal, which covers a lawsuit alleging that Coinbase Pro trading platform illegally inflated trading volumes. This received quite a bit of press coverage.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/coinbase-to-pay-6-5-million-to-settle-cftc-investigation-over-trading-11616192411
--
This item was added to import a Google Knowledge Graph entity, and looked notable (given the mention in Wikipedia), but will leave it to the community from here to decide. Iamcarbon (talk) 06:47, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I see a lot of coverage of coinbase pro on the Internet. I'll grant you that most of them aren't very reputable but there are just so many of them. E.g. mentioned in [2] BrokenSegue (talk) 14:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Preston Oliver III (Q110149010): (born 2006): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet notability requirements for Wikipedia Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 01:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Been delete before and is only a sibling to a celebrity and was created for non-sense. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 01:53, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tetsuya Sadō (Q17159061): Japanese association football player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. jawiki article has been deleted. Kokage si (talk) 04:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Savanna Sunrise (Q125121569): Digital marketing company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 13:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nedap Healthcare (Q109611399): Connecting people, knowledge and technology to improve the healthcare sector: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 15:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q121010197: Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Was merged into Q116811 --Virant (talk) 10:29, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I see, 'אורוויל' may be a translation of a variety of words, not just Oroville, but also Auroville, Orville, Orvil, (?..). So there is no strict equality between אורוויל & Oroville, thus I am not sure we need to merge the items. --Wolverène (talk) 12:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding blogs[edit]

Recai Karagöz (Q116919859): Turkish director: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Wooze 18:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

eofis (Q114906286): Company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable + promo Wooze 18:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

merhaba hayırdır moderatör benimle şahsi bi meselen mi var? eskiden bugüne girdiğim tüm verileri silme talebi acıyorsun derdin nedir? Orveka (talk) 18:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Natalia Guerrero (Q86993242): journalist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 19:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yukinori Gotō (Q11372651): Japanese association football player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. jawiki article has been deleted. Kokage si (talk) 12:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Played one match (all 90 minutes) at Emperor's Cup tournament. I can not totally exclude the notability for Wikidata. --Wolverène (talk) 05:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Juliano Teruel (Q111418326): Athlete: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 11:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unnamed Kojima Productions project (Q100715831): upcoming video game developed by Kojima Productions: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Impossible to identify what it is supposed to be. It can either be Death Stranding 2: On the Beach (Q115641709) or Physint (Q124396054). Solidest (talk) 16:51, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's been "upcoming" since 2020; the publisher is not the same as either of those games, and a search doesn't find anything relevant, so it could be something that was cancelled or never existed. Peter James (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to these two items, it may well be also OD (Q123699004), but I would agree that unfortunately it is difficult to say exactly which item this project belongs to. Deletion here is more than justified and the right decision than merging with one of the listed items. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 22:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's less likely as both the engine and publisher are stated and are different. Although the property is expected to be eventually complete (Q21873974) and the page there links to Wikidata, that page is almost empty with no source cited and I could find no other source of information, so I suggest changing Property:P8351#P2429 if the site has potentially unidentifiable entries such as this. Peter James (talk) 00:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding eatswithanthony[edit]

  1. Q125251740 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q125251665 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 16:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Q125251665 is definitely notable, considering they have pages on famous birthdays, fandom.com, and personality database, as well as having mentions in 4 pages of news results on google, on several of which they are named in the title. I would additionally conclude Q125251740 is notable via the relationship between the two (unmarried partners), although not as notable on their own through the lens of news coverage. Falsernet (talk) 17:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Websites like Famous Birthdays, Fandom or Personality Database are usually not considered serious since the entries there could be self-published. All of these three are also marked as Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320). I don't get any Google News results for iGumdrop, but that may be related to the search language. Maybe you can add some as references on the item? --Dorades (talk) 19:17, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
From what I can tell that doesn't apply to Famous Birthdays, as getting a page added is on a request-only basis. That aside, I've tried my best upping the number of references to various news articles. I've added significant persons, affiliations, and expanded the occupations, all referenced with news articles. Falsernet (talk) 00:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you,  Withdrawn for iGumdrop (Q125251665). --Dorades (talk) 08:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Summary #quickstatements; Author SSoster (WMB)
Number of edits 439 (more statistics) Example edit Q125214904

Sorry. Reference didn't run.


SSoster (WMB) (talk) 17:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Summary #quickstatements; Author SSoster (WMB)
Number of edits 169 (more statistics) Example edit Q125216249

Sorry. Reference didn't run.


SSoster (WMB) (talk) 17:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Summary #quickstatements; Author SSoster (WMB)
Number of edits 1 (more statistics) Example edit Q125215022

Sorry. Reference didn't run.


SSoster (WMB) (talk) 17:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Summary #quickstatements; Author SSoster (WMB)
Number of edits 5 (more statistics) Example edit Q125215042

Sorry. Reference didn't run.


SSoster (WMB) (talk) 17:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

QuickStatements can be used to add the same statements with references to the existing items. The existing item IDs can be used instead of "NEW", or if using CSV commands, before the first comma. (The same applies to other batches above, and group QSv2T/1711761278180). Peter James (talk) 13:17, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Dr. Peter Chee[edit]

  1. Q111077342 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q111086347 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q111077449 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:14, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Scott D. Clary and their podcast[edit]

  1. Q106809786 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q106834356 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

All sources I could find are self-published works, business and podcast directories, and some amount of sponsored content. Doesn't appear notable. William Graham (talk) 00:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding John J. Leppler and their law firm[edit]

  1. Q113311647 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q113325063 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Lawyer and their boutique law firm. External identifiers are business/law firm directories and social media. Search results are similar. Not notable. William Graham (talk) 00:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request lawyer Glen Lerner and their law firm[edit]

  1. Q108219233 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q108219644 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Lawyer and their law firm. Seems to have a couple branches, but all the identifiers and search results are business/lawyer directories and similar. Not any serious reporting. William Graham (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request related to AdsumPR[edit]

  1. Q116480539 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q116544953 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q121345019 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q118175483 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Multiple items on the same internet firm. Can't find anything other than business directories and what looks like sponsored content. Doesn't appear notable. All 3 touched by the same account, self promotion? William Graham (talk) 01:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding internet company and founder[edit]

  1. Q98362661 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q98362190 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Doesn't seem notable. All identifiers social media or business directories. William Graham (talk) 01:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request (atomization of Android versions)[edit]

  1. Q15621504 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q15621510 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q15621512 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

unused items, apparently atomizing different versions of the Android operating system, with unclear relation between them (Gingerbread (Q15621510) vs. Gingerbread (Q15621512) vs. their common superclass Android Gingerbread (Q2846916)) -- Data Consolidation Officer (talk) 13:58, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Merge Eclair (Q15621504) with Android Eclair (Q16348624).
For the other two, I think the creator was probably trying to document that Android Gingerbread has two API revision levels. I think this is worth modelling, but I don't think this is the right way to do it. Since they're not used, I lean toward delete. -- William Graham (talk) 19:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dames, Special Class of the Order of the Starry Cross (Q32113012): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Viz. above, help for the spanish wikipedia category required --Socius sociologicus (talk) 10:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dames, 1st Class of the Order of the Starry Cross (Q32113054): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Viz. above, help for the spanish wikipedia category required --Socius sociologicus (talk) 11:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Last Tango (Q124504863): Exhibition space in Zurich, Switzerland: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 09:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Notable, passes at least WDN3 as a number of Wikipedia articles refer to it, for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marlene_McCarty#Can_I_Borrow_Your_Hole_at_Last_Tango,_Zurich,_Switzerland,_11_Sep_%E2%80%93_19_Dec_2020 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfredo_Aceto and passes WDN2, for example https://www.on-curating.org/issue-48-reader/hidden-spaces-and-heavy-satin-last-tango.html and https://contemporarylynx.co.uk/independent-art-stage-in-switzerland Piecesofuk (talk) 14:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Broughton, Proposed Village Hall (Q114167887): village hall in Scottish Borders, Scotland, UK: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not really any point in having this on wikidata, it was proposed and never built, and isn't notable. RedAuburn (talk) 11:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Shouldn't Canmore ID (P718) made it notable? Fralambert (talk) 00:47, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request[edit]

  1. Q125313049 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q125313082 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable parent and child. Barely identifiable. William Graham (talk) 15:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: advertising items created by Jminot92[edit]

  1. Q61727605 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q61786999 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q81275496 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q61787600 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q82240740 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q112116303 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Advertisement items, don't seem notable. William Graham (talk) 16:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Buyagift (Q61727605) Notable business, plenty of coverage online eg, https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2006/aug/09/shopping.consumerpages https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/moonpig-splashes-out-14m-on-gift-experience-firms-7q0mgmvwn https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-click-cbwhrws5q8p https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1478745/How-to-lord-it-over-your-friends-for-only-29.99.html/1000 Piecesofuk (talk) 17:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: website items created by Mikel1090[edit]

  1. Q64564952 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q62056779 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q63390024 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Businesses that aren't notable. William Graham (talk) 16:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fuad Al-Qrize (Q125125596): Musician, Writer, Screenwriter, Author, Producer.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This entry has already been removed. The individual appears to be attempting self-promotion, and their primary account on Arabic Wikipedia has been banned. They seem to be trying to create additional accounts to circumvent this ban and promote the entry. — Osama Eid (talk) 23:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is Wikidata, not Wikipedia, the item was created for data collection about this person, not for self-promotion, as Mr. Osama Eid suggested, and I'll use the same, and we'll use the same argument he made when he was trying to prove other person's notability on Arabic Wikipedia:
1- GND (P227): https://d-nb.info/gnd/1262564190
2- LCNAF (P244): https://id.loc.gov/authorities/no2022130005
Those are Wikidata properties for an identifier that suggests notability, alongside other respectful and can't be self-created such as VIAF (P214), ISNI (P213), NLA (P409), NTA (P1006), IdRef (P269), ULAN (P245), NLA Trove (P1315), if all those libraries trusted who is he, and Mr. Osama thinks that he is trying to promote himself, then something is wrong.
By the way, I added the item not him and he has nothing to do with it. ~~ Mohammed Al-Sanaani (talk) 05:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This particular item has been removed multiple times in the past. Its previous owner, who used to be an administrator on Arabic Wikipedia, was banned for misusing Wikidata and Wikipedia to promote individuals who did not meet the required standards in return for financial gain and recognition. Interestingly, you hail from the same country as him and are connected with him on Facebook! — Osama Eid (talk) 19:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like Mr. Osama fully misunderstands the meaning of (Wikidata properties for an identifier that suggests notability) if an item was deleted for not meeting the notability in the past (which is not true because it did) or for other mysterious reasons!, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be created if it does gain the notability as the Identifiers says! Again, this is Wikidata, you shouldn't use those incorrect claims about (financial gain and recognition) and other strange reasons everywhere you can to fulfill your desires to punish him, could you make room for admins to check the identifiers of the Item, or even his website which contains more IDs and accomplishments, to make their final decisions? and me being from the same country as him or even know him as a public figure and has a big followers base on social media, doesn't prevent me from adding Item as I know, otherwise you, yourself, should stop adding Wikipedia pages about people you know and work for Wikipedia, right? this is gone so far by you, and I'll stop here and let the decisions to the admins. Mohammed Al-Sanaani (talk) 22:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your intentions are clear! When I requested the deletion of his previous item and it became evident that he was misusing Wikidata for fame and profit, he offered the same justification with the same tone and arguments. Wikidata is not a platform for seeking attention or recognition; it has strict policies that must be followed. — Osama Eid (talk) 21:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Felisberto Araújo (Q121484559): musical artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N+Spam Kacamata (talk) 23:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Patel (Q125418773): Online marketer and co-founder of Neil Patel Digital: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, possibly recreation of Q118612591. Lymantria (talk) 05:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Clearly notably, eg demonstrated by the Times of India reference. Piecesofuk (talk) 07:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Times of India link is clearly an "advertorial". --Lymantria (talk) 11:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
quote from the article "a New York Times bestselling author", eg https://www.nytimes.com/books/best-sellers/2016/10/09/business-books/ I've also added a number of external IDs that demonstrate notability Piecesofuk (talk) 12:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Claudia Bavel (Q113512938): Spanish pornographic actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Burch (Q113556524): Canadian Internet influencer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2MM followers on instagram seems reasonable? BrokenSegue (talk) 17:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elkhan Bashirov (Q116821085): Azerbaijan businessman: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The articles on this subject have been deleted on Azerbaijani and English Wikipedia. The subject isn't notable. Sura Shukurlu (Talk) 20:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Russian split jumps in figure skating (Q123594184): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Commons category too specific for Wikidata Harmonia Amanda (talk) 22:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

same as Biellmann spin (Q857418), and I-spins (Q123593417) Russian split jump is just one of element (Q47450979) PMG (talk) 07:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the Wikidata info is in use on Commons in the Infobox. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Yuck! (Q96484377): animated television series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Nothing notable to be included. Out of project scope. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 04:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Modjaji Books, South Africa (Q125454177): a publishing company in south Africa: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails notability / promo Rockpeterson (talk) 10:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shayan Safe (Q125162101): Iranian Rapper, Audio Engineer , Producer, Manager: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Arian (talk) 14:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This person is an Iranian rapper and producer and the deletion request is not correct and the entered information is completely correct
https://shayansafe.com/
https://isni.org/isni/000000051430247X
https://g.co/kgs/syDhqNm PersianRapGenius (talk) 07:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This person is an Iranian rapper and producer and the deletion request is not correct and the entered information is completely correct PersianRapGenius (talk) 07:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flemish Republic (Q125374827): proposed state in Flanders: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is a non-existent concept. RVA2869 (talk) 19:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is... I added a reference Jhowie Nitnek 19:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shannon F Greer (Q116997719): plant pathologist and researcher: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable --GeorgR (de) (talk) 22:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep notable researcher, have academic paper, added a ID. Fralambert (talk) 01:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check again[edit]

Hello, this is an Iranian record label in the rap style, which collaborates with prominent singers and is busy, and the information entered is completely correct. Please leave a comment for this decision. PersianRapGenius (talk) 22:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125125591: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Crosswiki spam Leonidlednev (talk) 22:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold until the ttwiki article is deleted. –FlyingAce✈hello 05:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Enablon[edit]

  1. Q59465211 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q110184711 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 09:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Boowa & Kwala[edit]

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 10:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Boowa & Kwala (Q23906515) Notable pre-school animation series, eg see https://www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/2001/03/21/www-boowakwala-com_165091_1819218.html and https://www.awn.com/news/boowa-kwala-make-their-us-debut-dvd Piecesofuk (talk) 15:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Transatel DataSim (Q28812330): Data only brand at Transatel: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 10:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding YoastCon[edit]

  1. Q61858694 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q61858801 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q61858802 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q61858805 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 10:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CoRDI 2023 - Blogpost (Q122912457): A blog post on https://sven-lieber.org: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 11:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
that blog post is a conceptual entity and it is described by serious and publicly available references: it has a DOI identifier and as a piece of scholarly communication is referenced by Crossref, The Rogue Scholar as well as in social media. Furthermore, a copy of it is available in the Internet archive.
I would argue that this makes it indeed notable, especially comparing it to most of the currently 2262 instances of blog posts on Wikidata. SvenLieber (talk) 07:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, how can these references be considered "serious" if they are created by yourself? We would need some independent source that makes it possible to evaluate the notability of your texts (e. g. referenced in scientific texts, published in a peer-reviewed journal, etc.). In general, this is not about the quality or importance of your texts, but about their notability according to WD:N. --Dorades (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q12845979: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

One of dozens of schools in Sumgait. Non-notable Atakhanli (talk) 01:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Atakhanli Why should a school not be notable? Do you question the school’s existence or legitimacy? --Emu (talk) 06:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Emu, ordinary school. There is no special difference. Atakhanli (talk) 07:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It doesn't matter if the school is important or not. Here are pages about hundreds of such schools. --Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 09:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Araz Yaquboglu Not every school is notable. Wikidata is not Google Maps. Atakhanli (talk) 09:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Araz Yaquboglu Public schools are generally notable per WD:N #2 as a “clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references”. There’s generally no risk of spam or advertisement here either. --Emu (talk) 10:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep public schools are notable elements. Solavirum (talk) 12:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Graziosi (Q37478317): American Jazz Musician, Multi-Instrumentalist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks notability, looks like spam --Nutshinou (talk) 07:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Kporaro (Q123717659): Nigerian-Liberian banker and socialite: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam, lacks notability: See c:File:Samuel Kporaro 2024.png, ms:Samuel Kporaro, c:Category:Samuele Kporaro, c:Category:Samuel Kporaro... --Nutshinou (talk) 08:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nutshinou: the item currently has a link to ig:Samuel Kporaro, so we would not be able to delete it per WD:N #1 (valid link to a Wikipedia article). If the article in igwiki is deleted, please let us know. –FlyingAce✈hello 21:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Byron L Frazier Jr. (Q114784808): American Entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails Wikidata notability  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Giacomo Ugarelli (Q124732992): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Ovruni (talk) 19:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hiro (Q123784044): unisex given name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merge with Q16276782. There are 2 items about the same given name. This is the oldest item (created on 11 April 2014). It is an international given name used in multiple languages and cultures. A second item about the same given name (Q123784044) was created by Xezbeth on 13 December 2023‎. There should only be 1 item about the same given name. So the duplicate, new item (Q123784044) should be merged with the oldest item (Q16276782). --Artanisen (talk) 20:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could this be an attempt to distinguish between Hiro written in Japanese spripts (ひろ / ヒロ) and Hiro that is written in Latin and belonged to another cultures? We normally keep separate items for names written in different alphabethical systems even if they completely correspond to each other in a way of reading. --Wolverène (talk) 06:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, for example the given name Erika is used in many languages including Japanese (written in Katakana as エリカ "Erika") and there is 1 main item about the name and a 2nd separate item about the Japanese version. However, these two could also be merged, because it's the same name and the Katakana or kanji writing can be added to 1 item. -Artanisen (talk) 16:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q109106116: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No apparent notability Quesotiotyo (talk) 03:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Erfurth: (item's creator). --Wolverène (talk) 07:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can be deleted. --Erfurth (talk) 13:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Indian Hacker (Q125498836): Indian YouTuber: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. --Wüstenspringmaus talk 12:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wifioverseas: (item's creator) --Wüstenspringmaus talk 13:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WiFi Overseas (Q125175989): Employment Agency: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. --Wüstenspringmaus talk 12:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wifioverseas: (item's creator) --Wüstenspringmaus talk 13:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Starex (Q70070123): pong console manufacturer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The real manufactirer of the pong consoles is "Samsung co. ltd" and not Starex. You can see it here:

https://20thcenturyvideogames.com/index.php?action=vermodelos&submenu=&tipo=2&sistema=Starex&verletra=S#Starex

You can read "Samsung CO. LTD." on the two box images (but non on the console images) Arosio Stefano (talk) 13:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Olusina Samuel (Q125499731): Olusina Samuel was born on 2007 in Iresi land as the eldest son went to Kidvarc, Goodwill, and St. Kizito Catholic College. Started his career at FHG as freelancer/network marketer, excelling through connections and determination.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam Trade (talk) 14:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HASSAN nassralah ail 674427 haifa 1000 METROS 4482 pm

Q125212090: Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty disambiguation item, only sitelink (svwiki) was turned into redirect Samoasambia 16:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cyklar (Q10464343): Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty disambiguation item, only sitelink (svwiki) was turned into redirect Samoasambia 16:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]