Shortcut: WD:RFD

Wikidata:Requests for deletions

From Wikidata
(Redirected from Wikidata:RFD)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Requests for deletions
Items which do not meet Wikidata's notability policy can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions on this page under the "Requests" section below. If it is obvious vandalism, just add the page here (gadget available), or ping an administrator to delete it. Contact can also be made with an administrator in #wikidata connect.

Before deleting items, check to ensure that they are not in use. This can be easily done with the "links" link below the header of each request.

Do not try to pre-emptively delete an item because its page is up for deletion on a Wikimedia project. The link will be removed by bots and reported here in the future if a deletion takes place.

Please use {{Q}} the first time you mention an item. Unless you use the gadget, please also ping the item's creator in your request (or ping the bot operator, when appropriate) if 1) the user is still active on Wikidata and 2) the user has contributed the majority of information in that item.

Please use Wikidata:Properties for deletion if you want to nominate a property for deletion.

This is not the place to request undeletion. Please use Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard instead. If help is needed with the merging of items, see the instructions at Help:Merge.

Add a new request

On this page, old requests are archived, if they are marked with {{Deleted}}. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at August 21.

Project
chat

Lexicographical
data

Administrators'
noticeboard

Development
team

Translators'
noticeboard

Request
a query

Requests
for deletions

Requests
for comment

Bot
requests

Requests
for permissions

Property
proposal

Properties
for deletion

Partnerships
and imports

Interwiki
conflicts

Bureaucrats'
noticeboard

Requests for deletions

medium

81 open requests for deletions.

Pages tagged with {{Delete}}[edit]

Click here to purge if this list is out of date.

Requests[edit]

Please add a new request at the bottom of this section, using {{subst:Rfd |1=PAGENAME |2=REASON FOR DELETION }}.



Example biographies[edit]

Q29962164[edit]

Example biography (Q29962164): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I would just delete it but there seems to be some external (mis)use. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 07:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
@Kjetil r: You should use Wikidata Sandbox (Q4115189), Second Wikidata sandbox (Q13406268) or test.wikidata.org for this purpose or take advantage of arbitrary access and create a real-world example. --Pasleim (talk) 13:02, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
I suppose Wikidata Sandbox (Q4115189) and/or Second Wikidata sandbox (Q13406268) could be used in some cases, but we also have a legitimate need for having a semi-stable dummy item that could be used for documentation purposes. I don't know test.wikidata.org very well, but is it really suitable for such use cases? For example, the birth date and death date of [1] do not appear in the infobox at [2]. Regards, Kjetil_r (talk) 15:25, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
This item doesn't seem to be used on no.wikipedia.org anymore. @Kjetil_r: Can you confirm? --Pasleim (talk) 13:03, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
@Kjetil_r, Pasleim, Matěj Suchánek: no activity on this discussion for 4 months, what should we do. And what about example biography 2 (Q30049473)? (I mean, we may keep one but 2 seems overkill). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:42, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Q30049473[edit]

example biography 2 (Q30049473): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I would just delete it but there seems to be some external (mis)use. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 07:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
It is being used for test, development, and documentation purposes on no.wikipedia. Isn't that within scope for what we can do? Regards, Kjetil_r (talk) 13:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

@Matěj Suchánek, Kjetil_r: I am not sure, but wouldn't Douglas Adams (Q42) (or something else) be better as an example? Bencemac (talk) 14:07, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

I need an example item where I can add or remove data at will when I work on making changes to infoboxes. I can't really do that to Douglas Adams (Q42). Regards, Kjetil_r (talk) 14:39, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep both. As Kjetil_r has demonstated, these serve sensible on-wiki software development and documentation purposes that actual biographies or Wikidata sandbox aren't sufficient for. Deryck Chan (talk) 13:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Not sure why we need to spend time on these, so I have no strong opinions on how we should do it. I do have a legitimate need for such items in the future, but I'll let others decide if we should keep these two, or if I can just create new ones when necessary. Regards, Kjetil_r (talk) 13:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

  • Pinging @Matěj Suchánek, Pasleim: Well, I don't see much point in deleting them now and creating them again for future tests so maybe it's probably best to keep them.--BRP ever 13:24, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
    My opinion still applies: this is nothing that belongs to Wikidata. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:49, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
    I also think these should be deleted. Someone saying they will recreate items if we delete them is not a valid reason to not delete the items - deliberately recreating items like that would normally result in a block. Other wikis seem to be able to use existing items for testing, development and documentation purposes - so why does the Norwegian Wikipedia need new ones? - Nikki (talk) 09:45, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Q13751745[edit]

Labelled "serfdom", containing only w:nl:Lijfeigenschap, which is now where it belongs, under Q103350. Steinbach (talk) 11:35, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

~410 Azerbaijani films[edit]

(Those items are listed at User:Pasleim/Items for deletion/Page deleted/Archive/2017-2.)
There are ~410 items about Azerbaijani films whose only sitelinks were deleted by azwiki admin User:Vusal1981 in October/November 2017. There are no identifiers, links, or references on the items, and they have barely been touched in the past 14 months by editors (as it happens to most abandoned items). As I have no idea where I can lookup information about them, I’d like to ask the community whether anyone can rescue these items so that they meet the notability requirements, or whether they shall be deleted as non-notable items. —MisterSynergy (talk) 08:28, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

  • We used to have more of them. I don't think they were based on an online resource. I vaguely recall discussing them with a contributor to that wiki. I don't recall who that was though. Obviously, it would be good to keep them, but that would need a reference to confirm them. --- Jura 08:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Found it: User_talk:Sotiale/Archive_A#azwiki. --- Jura 09:10, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Q15348443[edit]

Solenostoma paroicum (Q60617107): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Allready exists; see Q15348443 --Llywelyn2000 (talk) 18:21, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
@Llywelyn2000: For me it isn't clear that Solenostoma paroicum (Q60617107) and Jungermannia paroica (Q15348443) are identical. Can you elaborate? --Pasleim (talk) 09:12, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
As I understand, Solenostoma paroicum/shining flapwort is synonymic to Jungermannia paroica. --Wolverène (talk) 08:37, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Added the statement "Said to be the same as": [3], [4]. What do you think? --Wolverène (talk) 08:34, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

99of9
Achim Raschka (talk)
Andrawaag (talk)
Brya (talk)
CanadianCodhead (talk)
Christian Ferrer (talk)
Circeus
Dan Koehl (talk)
Daniel Mietchen (talk)
Enwebb
Faendalimas
FelixReimann (talk)
Infomuse (talk)
Infovarius (talk)
Jean-Marc Vanel
Joel Sachs
Josve05a (talk)
Klortho (talk)
Lymantria (talk)
MPF
Manojk
MargaretRDonald
Mellis (talk)
Michael Goodyear
Mr. Fulano (talk)
Nis Jørgensen
PEAK99
Peter Coxhead
PhiLiP
Andy Mabbett (talk)
Plantdrew
Prot D
pvmoutside
RaboKarbakian
Rod Page
Strobilomyces (talk)
Tinm
Tom.Reding
TomT0m
Tommy Kronkvist (talk)
Tris T7 TT me
Tubezlob
William Avery
Pictogram voting comment.svg Notified participants of WikiProject Taxonomy: can you provide some expertise, please …? Thanks, MisterSynergy (talk) 12:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

These are two different names, that is, two different formal entities. If there was more information a "taxon synonym" / "is a synonym of ..." statement could be added, but this information is not present. We really do need a "this name is homotypic with" property. - Brya (talk) 18:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
I am not an expert in Bryophytes, but the two taxa do have the same basionym: Nardia paroica Schiffn. Lotos 58: 320. 1910. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 22:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC), 22:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC).
Yes, that is what I said: they are homotypic. - Brya (talk) 12:25, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Yes. Also – for what it's worth – ITIS lists Solenostoma paroicum (Schiffn.) Schust. as a synonym of Jungermannia fossombronioides Aust. (Q17290457), but doesn't list Jungermannia paroica at all. Then again I guess ITIS is fairly often not very well updated these days. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 12:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC).
Yes. And Tropicos says that Jungermannia fossombronioides is treated as a synonym of Solenostoma fossombronioides by Stotler, R. E. & B. J. Crandall-Stotler. 2017. A synopsis of the liverwort flora of North America north of Mexico. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 102(4): 574–709. A synopsis of the liverwort flora of North America north of Mexico. Information on bryophytes is fairly scarce. - Brya (talk) 17:51, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Q57823196[edit]

Área de Proteção Contígua--Rio Vermelho (Q57823196): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Português: cultural district (Q3710552) inventado por Prburley (talkcontribslogs). Quando foi questionado em Talk:Q57823196#Fonte, não apresentou fontes para confirmar a existência disso retratado no item. As fontes apresentadas tratam de outro assunto (uma antiga fábrica localizada em outra região de Salvador).

--Luan (talk) 01:15, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:20, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The reference is under the instance (P31) statement, page 14 of PDF, published by the Secretaria Municipal de Desenvolvimento Urbano, Habitação e Meio Ambiente (Sedham) of Salvador in 2007. If a government document is insufficient to support an item, please delete it. Prburley (talk)
  • @Luan: is a mixup or not? --- Jura 07:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
    @Jura1: Ainda mantenho minha proposição de eliminação. Em resumo, mesmo alterando a denominação para algo que está previsto em lei, ainda é somente algo previsto em lei, sem a efetivação de uma regulamentação que delimitaria de forma mais precisa o território (o que está e o que não está situado nele). Explicando mais detalhadamente, na página 14 do PDF encontra-se a inciso XIII, art. 230, da Lei n.° 7.400/2008 (PDDU) de 27 de fevereiro de 2007 (que dispõe sobre o General plan (Q837215) de Salvador (Q36947)). Lá trata da "APCP do Rio Vermelho", ou seja, da Área de Proteção Cultural e Paisagística (APCP) do Rio Vermelho. Não há nada sobre "Área de Proteção Contígua--Rio Vermelho" ou "APC--Rio Vermelho". Vale dizer que a Lei n.° 7.400/2008 foi revogada pela Lei n.º 9.069/2016 (vide art.411), encerrando uma série de contestações judiciais, mas os termos sobre a APCP do Rio Vermelho foram mantidos/copiados (vide art. 269, inciso XIII). Além disso, não existe ainda regulamentação da APCP do Rio Vermelho pelo poder legislativo municipal. A regulamentação em legislação específica é importante para identificar, dentre outras coisas, a delimitação em escalas adequadas para cada APCP e é requerida pela Lei n.º 9.069/2016 para a devida institucionalização como APCP. Por exemplo, existe regulamentação para a "APCP da Ladeira da Barra/Santo Antônio da Barra" e outras 8 APCP (vide Lei n.º 8165/2012). --Luan (talk) 23:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
    @Luan: & @Jura1:Uma mensagem do: Instituto do Patrimônio Artístico e Cultural da Bahia, Secretaria de Cultura do Estado da Bahia (IPAC), 11/2/2019 (hoje.) "[...] no bairro do Rio Vermelho tem uma poligonal de tombamento. Vale ressaltar que no entorno da poligonal alguns imóveis são tombados individualmente. [...] O nome é o Poligonal do Rio Vermelho."Prburley (talk)
    Should the item "Área de Proteção Contígua--Rio Vermelho" be "Poligonal do Rio Vermelho"? Thanks, Paul Prburley (talk)
    Onde isso foi dito? Nessa imagem no Facebook? Independentemente de onde foi dito, vale salientar que toda a legislação anteriormente citada e a Sedham são da esfera municipal (municipal prefecture of Salvador (Q53930901)). Já o Instituto do Património Artístico e Cultural da Bahia (Q10302963) pertence à esfera estadual (Q61641530). Logo, não tem nada a ver uma coisa com a outra, pois as esferas de governo são autônomas em suas classificações de patrimônio. Em listagem de 2017, também não há nada na esfera federal (National Historic and Artistic Heritage Institute (Q391537)) como "Conjunto Urbano" ou na coluna de dados do tombamento "paisagístico" relativo ao Rio Vermelho. Essa tal poligonal também não consta na lista do IPAC para bens em Salvador. Só uma frase postada em Facebook não prova nada, na ausência de uma lei, de uma delimitação, de um processo de tombamento. Esse item deve ser eliminado. --Luan (talk) 00:29, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
    Onde isso foi dito? Na minha correspondência com o Instituto do Património Artístico e Cultural da Bahia (Q10302963), um órgão governamental do Estado da Bahia. Leia a mensagem acima. Prburley (talk)
    @Prburley: eu li. Você disse quem, não disse a fonte da informação. Independentemente, você começou dizendo que era um tombamento municipal (apontou legislação municipal). Provei que não existia. Agora tenta dizer que há um tombamento estadual (apontou uma aparente fala do IPAC). Provei também que não existe o tombamento nessa esfera. Me adiantei e mostrei também que não há tombamento federal. Não há mais porque manter esse item. @Jura1: can you delete this item? --Luan (talk) 01:07, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
    @Jura1: As a librarian I believe government documents and communication with the relevant government entities point to establishing some entity--and working towards its proper name, not a deletion. This is well covered in Wikidata: Notability. Prburley (talk)
    @Luan: Please review the guidelines at: Presumir a boa-fé. Language like "inventado" assumes that an editor randomly "invents" things rather than editing in good faith using given sources. Thanks! Prburley (talk)
    @Prburley: você pula de uma esfera governamental para outra tentando provar sem sucesso que o item que criou tem base na realidade para além do teu solitário entendimento. As esferas são autônomas, uma não pode intervir no que for estabelecido pela outra. Logo, o IPAC não normatiza sobre Sedham ou sobre o PDDU, pois estes são municipais, e vice-versa. "Área de Proteção Contígua--Rio Vermelho" não existe, em nenhuma esfera de governo. "Área de Proteção Cultural e Paisagística (APCP) do Rio Vermelho" foi prevista em lei de Salvador, mas nunca foi criada, delimitada. Sem isso, não é possível identificar o que está dentro dela ou não; não é possível identificar qual imóvel é abrigado nessa área territorial; não é possível determinar o tamanho dessa área; não há data, características ou condições de proteção. "Poligonal do Rio Vermelho" não teve a fonte/referência que confirme sua existência, a não ser a imagem publicada no Facebook que apontei. Mas novamente, não há informações sobre essa possível área, tamanho características, imóveis incluídos, etc. O fato de ser bibliotecário não parece te ajudar no processo de busca por fontes que confirmem a existência detalhada do item que quer tanto manter. A boa-fé não permanece diante de uma situação como essa, lembrando que isso começou na página de discussão do item na qual você me ignorou e apontou fontes sem relação com o item, ao que se soma as mensagens alternantes aqui entre as esferas de governo no Brasil, mostrando desconhecimento e insistência infundada. Esse item poderia muito bem figurar em Wikipedia:Silly Things (Q4995845) ou Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia (Q14629005). --Luan (talk) 16:06, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
    A existência de tal entidade ainda não foi comprovada. Por isso, além de remover informações falsas, removi também as alegações não verificáveis de localização e instância. --Luan (talk) 14:36, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Q40985505[edit]

Cebus sp. (Q40985505): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Ambiguous, not a valid taxon, and unlinked. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 08:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

@Tommy Kronkvist: it has a valid identifier, thus I tend to keep it. If some of the statements are not correct, please use deprecated rank to remove this item from query results. Is that possible? --MisterSynergy (talk) 06:44, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
@MisterSynergy: Perhaps, but I don't think so. As far as I understand it, the NCBI Taxonomy identifier regards a species of virus named Cebine betaherpesvirus 1 (Q24808723). It has been found in two host species: humans, and in an unspecified specimen belonging to the Gracile capuchin monkey genus Cabron (Q8447051). The Virus-Host DB page can be found here: https://www.genome.jp/virushostdb/1125844 I'm only guessing here, but it seems the scientists studying this particular strain of virus didn't bother to identify which of the fifteen or so species of the Cebus genus that particular monkey belonged to. The reason for this is of course that they were not really studying the monkey at all, but the virus using it as host.
Normally within the field of taxonomy the term "species" or the abbreviation "sp." is only used when failing to pinpoint a particular species within a recognized genus. More or less, "sp." is only a placeholder for a taxon name until the specimen has been properly identified as being a member of a valid species, or described as a new species. In this case however, no one ever tried to do this. In fact, instead of (sort of...) specifying the object as "Cebus sp." they might just as well simply have called it "monkey". In this particular case "Cebus sp." doesn't really relate to any specific taxon at all – hence, it can never be a "deprecated" taxon either.
Lastly, perhaps @Pigsonthewing have an opinion about all this? He's familiar with most things about taxonomy, and on top of that also knows more about the Wikidata tech details than me. Best regards, Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 10:12, 18 April 2019 (UTC).
Thanks for asking. I have no definitve answer. On the one hand, MisterSynergy is correct in regard the identifier making it notable. On the other, if it is valid, why not the same for every other (non-monotypic) genus? Perhaps we should keep it, but with a different value for P31? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Yes, "keep it, but with a different value for P31" is what I had in mind; I am just not qualified to select another value item :-)
The item was created by User:Magnus Manske, apparently as an import from Taxonomy database of the U.S. National Center for Biotechnology Information (Q13711410). If we kept the item, we would avoid that someone would re-create a new item for that database entry in the future. —MisterSynergy (talk) 07:33, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Q55687191[edit]

clarification (Q55687191): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Referent unclear Swpb (talk) 15:58, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

  • See the Polish description. Delete because it's unused and because Wikidata is not a terminology dictionary. --Wolverène (talk) 16:03, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
    • Avaiable in Ross Brawn and Adam Parr Total Competition: Lessons in strategy from Formula One. Simply saying it's process in Formula One. Should be keeped same as Q10747721. Eurohunter (talk) 16:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
      • With lack of references in statements it's still not notable. --Wolverène (talk) 21:53, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
      • @Eurohunter: can we merge into homologation (Q10747721), so that "klaryfikacja" remains as alias for that item? The term might occur in the source you provide, but it seems rarely used otherwise, right? --MisterSynergy (talk) 06:52, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
      • @Eurohunter: Re-ping, your input will be helpful to MisterSynergy's response above. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 04:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Q61446814[edit]

Q61446814: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It seems to be this series has no seasons: https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seznam_d%C3%ADlů_seriálu_Děrevnja_durakov Queryzo (talk) 06:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Derevnya durakov (The Fool's Village) was a part of sketch TV show en:Calambur. Calambur had 6 seasons. I'm not sure if Derevnya durakov divided by seasons itself. Anyway, it's not our problem for now, request the deletion of the Czech article in their project first. --Wolverène (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

... so you did it wrong. --Wolverène (talk) 09:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  • @Queryzo: looking above your move seem to be controversial, could you please explain? ‐‐1997kB (talk) 04:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
    you can feel free to revert my edits, I'm not familiar with this series and may did wrong with requesting a deletion. Queryzo (talk) 11:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Q22284875[edit]

Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Incomplete and erroneous duplicate of Q567079 --Iulle (talk) 20:24, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
It look like Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q567079) is about all the station including Fernbahnhof and S-bahn rail. and Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) is only about s-bahn. but I don't know if it is right or not. - yona b (talk) 11:03, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
That's correct. That's why Q22284875 has a Property:P361 pointing to Q567079. One cannot merge these items without removing that property first. - cycŋ - (talkcontribslogs) 06:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
I started to clean up the three items. But it is a bit difficult Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q567079) Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) Jungfernheide metro station (Q19951075) --GPSLeo (talk) 17:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

There have been some changes in the items recently. @Srittau, MB-one, GodeNehler, GPSLeo: can you please have a look, particularly at the item histories [5][6][7]? I have no idea how we usually model railway stations. —MisterSynergy (talk) 07:52, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

The content of Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) should definitely not get removed until the deletion request is decided. But we have to decide if a station with a part for the S-Bahn (Q95723) and a part for the regular railway should have two separate items or not. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:09, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
I would propose to stay only with item Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q567079) and to remove item Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) as the Berlin S-Bahn (Q99654) of Berlin has only combined items with S-Bahn and Train. There are only separate item for Berlin U-Bahn (Q68646), see also item Berlin Alexanderplatz station (Q698497), Berlin-Friedrichstraße railway station (Q702402) or Berlin Hauptbahnhof (Q1097). --GodeNehler (talk) 08:51, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
I don't know if this is the case here, but S-Bahn stations are quite often treated as separate stations from the main line stations, they share the name with, if they don't share any track infrastructure (which is the case here). So, I guess, we should keep separate items for all three stations (main line (Q3238851), S-Bahn (Q95723) and rapid transit (Q5503)). --MB-one (talk) 09:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  • The items seems to be confused at the moment. In reality the station has 2 S-Bahn tracks, 2 U-Bahn tracks, 2 regular train tracks and at least 2 metro bus stops(I'm not sure from memory whether it's 2 or 4 metro stops). The S-Bahn part and the train part is owned DB Netz (Q896765) but neither buses nor U-Bahn is. ChristianKl❫ 13:25, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Q59783740[edit]

according to some sources (Q59783740): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sitelinks, little data, vague statement.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  21:03, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

I guess it is supposed to be a qualifyer and is used as such.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:10, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Mr. Guye, this value is for Property:P1480, the English label has already been set.--Arbnos (talk) 16:35, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
@Arbnos: sourcing circumstances (P1480) is where I discovered this item. Just to clarify, Q59783740 didn't have an English label until Arbnos added one. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  02:06, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep seems a bit unuseful (putting some sources in reference should be enough and more direct) but legit. @Arbnos: could you add a description? (something like on circa (Q5727902) or presumably (Q18122778))  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by VIGNERON (talk • contribs) at 13:50, 12 June 2019‎ (UTC).

Q60700696[edit]

General Prosecutor of the Republic (Q60700696): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

ShouldAttorney General of Mexico (Q1507504) --Jesuiseduardo (talk) 01:04, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:10, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
That doesn't seem to be the same: Attorney General of Mexico (Q1507504) relates to Procuraduría General de la República (Q50150345) like General Prosecutor of the Republic (Q60700696) relates to Fiscal General de la República (Q60678925). - сyсn - (talkcontribslogs) 07:40, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Q741032[edit]

Trigger point (Q741032): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It should be merged with Myofascial trigger point (Q1956673) as they refer to the same concept. --Nasch92 (talk) 11:31, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

They both have a zh.wp link, can someone native check if that is true they are the same? Q.Zanden questions? 23:37, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
@Lakokat: Please take a look. Thanks in advance! Bencemac (talk) 12:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Q20984678[edit]

eater (Q20984678): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

@Thierry Caro, Sjoerddebruin: I don't think that "eater" is really an occupation, or that pointing to this item with subclass of (P279) or occupation (P106) is the proper way to model that something eats something else. I don't think this item serves any real purpose. Yair rand (talk) 03:28, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:30, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. It's OK. Thierry Caro (talk) 04:48, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Yair rand: if this is not the proper way, how would you suggest to do it? In particular, I'm thinking about competitive eaters like Molly Schuyler (Q6896676) who do have for principal - and sometimes professional - occupation to be an eater. Until then I would lean towards Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 12:20, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
@VIGNERON: One's occupation can be participating in eating competitions, but one's occupation can't be "being an entity that eats". (I see that User:Thierry Caro has created competitive eater (Q63554580) for the actual occupation, which is more accurate.) man-eater (Q1365331) and Cookie Monster (Q1754267) are not modeled in a way that makes sense, though. We have main food source (P1034), though I'm not sure that would work here. --Yair rand (talk) 18:37, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Q57904781[edit]

Pascale Canova (Q57904781): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Demande de la personne objet de la notice Alain Schneider (talk) 08:08, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:10, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
no more links Alain Schneider (talk) 08:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
It is highly irregular for your to remove links, and data, while the item's deletion is being discussed; doubly so as you have declared an apparent conflict of interest. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:05, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep "Request of the person who is the subject of the notice" is not a valid reason for deletion; and is in any case stated without evidence. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:25, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Alain Schneider: pourrais-tu donner des détails ? d'où viens la demande de suppression, directement de la concernée ? est-ce publique ? sur quoi cette demande est-elle basée ? etc. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:33, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @VIGNERON: Cette personne est une collègue de travail qui ne voit pas en quoi des éléments personnels ont à être mis dans une base de données publique. Elle considère que c'est contraire au RGPD et veut s'adresser à la CNIL. J'ai d'ailleurs quasiment vidé (avant que tu ne les remettes) la notice de toute information et enlevé tous les liens Alain Schneider (talk) 19:51, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
      • Indeed, after carefull checking most of these data are not public so I would lean towards Symbol delete vote.svg Delete at the very least and in any case, the history should be purge by an admin. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:56, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Cleopatra (disambiguation)[edit]

Q60374066: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It should be merged into Q20799297 but automatic merge fails. Maybe the same with: Q60371864(French) Q60372192(Greek) Q60372373(Cyrillic) Q60372801(Persian) Q60372959(Hebrew) Q60373103(Belarusian) Q60373294(Armenian) Q60373492(Japanese) Q60373639(Georgian) Q60373849(Chinese) --Puzzlet Chung (talk) 03:12, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

They can't be merged now because they're interlinked with Property:P460. - сyсn - (talkcontribslogs) 07:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
In January @Moebeus: add Property:P460 to all the item and didn't merge them. maybe he can help us to understand why not merge them. - yona b (talk) 07:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
@יונה בנדלאק: Hi there! It is the practise of Wikidata:WikiProject_Names that each spelling variant gets its own item, even if all that separates them is just an accent. Since each name should be linked to a corresponding disambiguation page, it's cleaner if those follow the same "rule". Rather than merging, the different spellings are instead linked through Property:P460. This has the added bonus of allowing more than one disambiguation page per language, of which there are quite a few. Anyways, that was the rationale, if you guys feel strongly about it I won't protest, but it would be helpful if a differing practise is anchored in some sort of written guidelines and cleared with Wikidata:WikiProject_Names. Moebeus (talk)

Q31274785[edit]

Q31274785: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There exists Q19597898 Estopedist1 (talk) 18:16, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:20, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Technically two different names, Q31274785 is a variant for the people who living in Estonia or Finland with the official Latin script, Q19597898 is for citizens of countries with the Cyrillic script as official. I'm not sure there's need on merging even if the names in fact direct equivalents of each other. --Wolverène (talk) 22:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Q18974314[edit]

COX3 (Q18974314): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Obsolete Magnus Manske (talk) 10:48, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:50, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
  • @Magnus Manske: There seem to be a lot of GeneDB ID's for this item. Why do you think they are wrong? ChristianKl❫ 13:15, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Q61873305[edit]

Pf_M76611 (Q61873305): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Obsolete, unused Magnus Manske (talk) 10:51, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:00, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Can't delete, excesively used in COX3 (Q18974314). --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 10:54, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Q31441239[edit]

Maria Angeles Guanzon Lapeña (Q31441239): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet Wikidata:Notability since it represents a page in the "Draft:" namespace. Steel1943 (talk) 21:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

  • Leaning Symbol keep vote.svg Keep, even without the wikilink this person seems notable enough for WD. That said, the draft link should probably be removed (especially as this is a draft for a long time). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:14, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Q61866606[edit]

Summaries list (Q61866606): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It looks like most, if not all, of the links in this item are for "MediaWiki:" pages. For this reason, does not meet Wikidata:Notability since it represents a page in the "MediaWiki:" namespace. Steel1943 (talk) 21:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

If deleted, please replace the item with interwiki links on all local pages. This was the main reason I created the item - to link the same code gadgets inbetween to make it easier to administrate. --Dvorapa (talk) 21:42, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Q61870979[edit]

Default summaries (Q61870979): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It looks like most, if not all, of the links in this item are for "MediaWiki:" pages. For this reason, does not meet Wikidata:Notability since it represents a page in the "MediaWiki:" namespace. Steel1943 (talk) 21:29, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

If deleted, please replace the item with interwiki links on all local pages. This was the main reason I created the item - to link the same code gadgets inbetween to make it easier to administrate. --Dvorapa (talk) 21:42, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Q31797707[edit]

Q31797707: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

"Poes d' Trouk" is "Zea mays", than to be linked with Q11575 Lucyin (talk) 21:11, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Q22808320[edit]

human name disambiguation page (Q22808320): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I think this should be replaced with Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410). Its presence just complicates checking for dab pages. Pictogram voting comment.svg Notified participants of WikiProject Names --- Jura 12:53, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Q28065731[edit]

duplicated disambiguation page (Q28065731): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Not sure what it adds. Complicates check for disambiguation. Use Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410) instead --- Jura 18:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support; It is in use in ~900 items as value of instance of (P31), most of them with qualifiers of (P642) that link to the "main" item. I suggest to use Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410) as value for instance of (P31), and add a permanent duplicated item (P2959) statement that links to the main item. Also: @Pasleim: who has created this item. --MisterSynergy (talk) 11:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Q64639286[edit]

baseline water stress (Q64639286): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks definition MisterSynergy (talk) 05:56, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

  • @MisterSynergy:, I don't understand, are you saying you can't see the description? It has the description 'the ratio of total water withdrawals relative to the annual available renewable surface water supplies' --John Cummings (talk) 08:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Q62239558[edit]

boat clasp (Q62239558): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks definition MisterSynergy (talk) 05:56, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Q3847897[edit]

Mariella Converti (Q3847897): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item about non-notable subject Horcrux (talk) 16:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Q56109259[edit]

many sports (Q56109259): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This looks like a lazy attempt to avoid listing all sports of multi-sport events (such as the Olympics) with sport (P641). Per this query, there are some 100 uses to be replaced before this item can be deleted. MisterSynergy (talk) 18:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:10, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
If relevant, please see some consensus discussion at Project Sports. Jagulin (talk) 05:14, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Q63968208[edit]

Kovářová (Q63968208): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No need for this item, only included redirects; this is a feminine version of the name Kovář, no need for it in Wikidata ontology Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 20:43, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: empty items by User:Tdombos[edit]

All items were created by User:Tdombos in January, but they are still empty. I deleted them back then, and restored them after a complaint in Topic:Ut0yiyhv614sxjj0; months later they are still empty and unused, so I guess this is abandoned content. MisterSynergy (talk) 06:43, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Ooops, sorry about that, forgot about them. Will quickly do it now. Tdombos (talk) 16:39, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
@MisterSynergy: Have these items been improved to your satisfaction? Mahir256 (talk) 18:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Not really, but if User:Tdombos wants to work on them a little more, I have no problems to keep this section open for a while. Some items are still completely empty; some others meanwhile have some basic statements, but still do not comply with the notability policy. IIRC Tdombos wanted to bring them to actual use as well in other items, which would be interesting to have a look at as well. —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:14, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Q65939978[edit]

Monica Montero Lomeli (Q65939978): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy David (talk) 04:24, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:10, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Q60143408[edit]

--181.66.194.12 06:09, 26 July 2019 (UTC) Hoax page: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q60143408 Fake info provided on sources, including, but not limited to IMDb, wikipedia and musicbrainz

please prove proof. CatQuest, The Endavouring Cat (talk) 17:20, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Q63245258[edit]

Michael Moates (Q63245258): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability --2600:6C56:6F08:1CF:0:464:3322:362B 08:38, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Q65923073[edit]

Darante (Q65923073): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Is this person notable? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Have you seen the number of statement? I wish many other languages would have half of the statements available here. Keep. no bias — קיין אומוויסנדיקע פּרעפֿערענצן — keyn umvisndike preferentsn talk contribs 06:46, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
All by one person, who propably likes Darante's work and/or is (a friend of) the person. Does that make this person notable? - сyсn - (talkcontribslogs) 15:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Q65933055[edit]

Nesto Hypermarket (Q65933055): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 16:46, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep I just came across this on OTRS, and the company seems notable. I've added a reference, Google shows plenty of other sources. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:02, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Q59949329[edit]

Ivai Tamilala Ennum Ayarchol Akarathi (Q59949329): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

User:Thamizhpparithi Maari, it doesn't look like a lexeme Infovarius (talk) 11:12, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Q56297778[edit]

Q56297778: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This should be marged with Q63030948. Same article. --49.129.144.187 11:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose; It's not. - сyсn - (talkcontribslogs) 12:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Q4956264[edit]

Brampton Walk of Fame (Q4956264): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is an inaccurate mix of Q66023179 and Q66023163. --Zanimum (talk) 12:58, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold - The article is en:Brampton Arts Walk of Fame, so this should be fixed on the enwiki. - сyсn - (talkcontribslogs) 15:27, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Q60038053[edit]

serving (Q60038053): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by User:NMaia for a property proposal which was meanwhile closed by User:ZI Jony as "not done". Do we still need this item?

--MisterSynergy (talk) 10:30, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Q63648354[edit]

Category:Mississippi Queen (ship, 1987) (Q63648354): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by User:Clemens Stockner for the still-existing Commons category commons:Category:Mississippi Queen (ship, 1987). However, User:Ein Dahmer insists on User talk:Ein Dahmer#Mississippi Queen that this category sitelink should not be linked to the item as there is already commons:Category:ENI 02317978 for the same vessel, linked to Mississippi Queen (Q63676401). How are these cases handled? Also pinging some experienced Wikidata+Commons editors: @Mike Peel, Jarekt, Jheald: thanks for any input. --MisterSynergy (talk) 10:42, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Q7080602[edit]

Ohagro (Q7080602): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No such place exists. The coordinates given refer to an area of empty moorland. Maps show a river called Abhainn Othagro, but no settlement. Searching Google only brings up results derived from Wikipedia and related sites. --94.196.196.84 12:41, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold - There are 3 entries, so it has to be fix on the local wikis before it could be delted.

Q3812187[edit]

KSEX (Q3812187): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item about a former internet radio stream, deleted on the English Wikipedia because not notable and on the Italian Wikipedia via speedy deletion because not notable and made with Google Translate. I can't see how it could be notable for Wikidata, there are no databases or reliable sources to add to the item. --Lombres (talk) 09:03, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66084620[edit]

M. R. X. Dentith (Q66084620): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promo --大诺史 (talk) 13:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
  • I think we should Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. He has identifiers. We definitely need to clean it up. And I am not sure why his book is listed twice (once as 1st edition). But the item itself is passes IMO. Quakewoody (talk) 14:03, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Q65920558[edit]

Q65920558: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty. De-article was deleted. --Dandelo (talk) 09:59, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Q6799778[edit]

Mbsf (Q6799778): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The English Wikipedia article (the only sitelink) has been redirected (final revision of article). I would replace this with a lexeme containing the equivalent information. Jc86035 (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Q20738855[edit]

urban area with a population of 150-199 (Q20738855): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

While this item currently satisfies the structural notability criterion, it seems to be only used on a couple of items as a instance of (P31) value, which might not be appropriate. (The item has no sitelinks and is described as an "inofficial [sic] concept".) Unless the relevant census data is not detailed enough to add the exact values through population (P1082), it should be possible to replace all the uses of this item. Jc86035 (talk) 16:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 10 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:30, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Q52835700[edit]

vPlus. (Q52835700): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable organization Jc86035 (talk) 16:30, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:40, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete I am not even sure what that is. A person. A company. A piece of art. And we need to look at what the item it links to. I don't understand that one either. Quakewoody (talk) 14:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Q58021361[edit]

Zack Evans (Q58021361): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable individual, possible spam --159.33.10.155 23:13, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • If I remember correctly, the creator of the item uses IMDb cast lists to link/create Wikidata items. It may or may not meet notability, but it isn't (1st generation) spam. Is it spam on IMDb that then got innocently repeated here - possibly. But the item creator is not the spammer. To get rid of this item, you would literally need to look into each item that is linked to it, and each item that links to that... so on and so forth. Quakewoody (talk) 14:20, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Q2253321[edit]

Karelia University of Applied Sciences (Q2253321): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

That one is the old one, nowadays no more that-well-known name, for this educational institute, Karelia University of Applied Sciences. So, I think it is best to be merged with the newer Wikidata item representing the correct name for it; Q66116099. --Sjiili (talk) 01:42, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:50, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  • merging is one thing. Deleting is another. But your argument (assuming there isn't a language barrier) of "nowadays no more that-well-known name," doesn't apply. If something is once notable, it will always be notable. Quakewoody (talk) 22:05, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The newer item, Karelia University of Applied Sciences (Q66116099) (which Sjiili created), should be merged into the older item. The new item has no sitelinks. If it is desirable to change the label of the older item because the institution itself has been renamed, this can be done without deleting or merging any items, so I'm not sure why it was necessary to create a new item. Jc86035 (talk) 13:06, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Q55973551[edit]

Adrian Coman (Q55973551): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doesn't meet the notability policy Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 10:04, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Q55594712[edit]

Q55594712: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is not the phonedirectory Bahnmoeller (talk) 19:55, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:00, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep A Stolperstein in Ulm Stolperstein dedicated to Heinrich Barth (Q55579500) is dedicated to Q55594712. More information on the Projectsite. Looniverse (talk) 13:04, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Q23308924[edit]

IEEE official website (Q23308924): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item is the "official website" of Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (Q131566). Is there a reason that a website, this one in particular, should be its own item? Senator2029 (talk) 01:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:10, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
It’s a clearly identifiable entity. I used it in a source statement to state in which website a url that sourced something pointed to (Q23308923#P279. Meets the notabitily policy then, it does not requires any further reason. author  TomT0m / talk page 07:20, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep @Senator2029: it's strange but unusual (we have more than 9318 items about website right now) and it's used as a source which is a reason enough to keep. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 17:05, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment – This item is for the organization's homepage which is not useful as a reference URL either on Wikidata or Wikipedia, as those should be specific unique links. @VIGNERON, TomT0m: Senator2029 (talk) 06:09, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
It’s not used as a reference url, so I don’t understand the point. It’s used to explicit the publication location, exactly as for a scientific article we also state the scientific journal in which it is published, even if their is a link to the full article content available online. author  TomT0m / talk page 16:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Q57413539[edit]

David Alfredo Garzon Ramos (Q57413539): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Personal information - The page contains my personal information that I do not want to be displayed by the website. The information was added by Edoderoobot and it is being exposed without my consent. --Dgarzonr (talk) 06:30, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

As far as I can see the page only lists information that's already in the public record via https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7099-4213 do you also consider them to illegimitely display the information? ChristianKl❫ 10:37, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Q43038658[edit]

COOL RISING (radio program) (Q43038658): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

radio program (Q1555508) at unknown Russian radiostation. No links. --Ksc~ruwiki (talk) 09:33, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Q47159728[edit]

Trillium Ensemble (Q47159728): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unclear notability. No sitelinks. Technically, the item is notable due to the structural criterion, but only because of the existence of Silent Spring Project (Q47010732), which represents one of the group's albums. As a whole, the musical group and their works would likely fail WD:N if they were not linked to each other. Jc86035 (talk) 13:00, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66305811[edit]

Ludvík Váša (Q66305811): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Bad source, real name is Ludvík Vašica Skim (talk) 17:05, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

@Skim: could you not just correct the name and source? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:07, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
@VIGNERON: I created this record from Historie učitelských ústavů na Moravě a jejich význam pro současnost (Q66305797), but this bachelor thesis isn't right. I found Zpráva c.k. ústavu ku vzdělání učitelů v Příboře za léta 1875–1899 (Q66305950), where is precise list of directors of school. Second director hasn't this name, but Ludvík Vašica Ludvík Vašica (Q66306493). Source is on many places in this report.
So i can merge this two records, but this one is false, i decided that deleting is better. Skim (talk) 15:45, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Oh, ok, thanks for the precisions. I would still merge and correct (which is the usual way), I let others give their point of view. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:22, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Q50356767[edit]

Adriana Rose-Gonzalez (Q50356767): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Clearly unnotable Kissa21782 (talk) 07:07, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:10, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
  • I vote Symbol delete vote.svg Delete for the reason given. But would also suggest the linking pages be deleted as well, her spouse Q29169205 is non-notable, and his band Q32062724 is also not notable. Quakewoody (talk) 14:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. I don't think any of the three items are notable so I support deleting all three of them.--BRP ever 05:41, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Q27638501[edit]

Psi Geminorum (Q27638501): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Psi Geminorum does not exist Ghuron (talk) 11:00, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Ghuron: indded, it does not exist now but did it exist in the past (by mistake probably). Given that there is a Bayer designation (that I didn't check yet), I guess it still notable ; obviously, it should be clearly indicated as a mistake. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:44, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
@VIGNERON: well, I was trying to check Bayer designation and didn't find anything. May be you'll have better luck --Ghuron (talk) 16:47, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
@Ghuron: not easy, but I found it [8] so I would say Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. It's near 15 Cancri (Q4029002), could it be a confusion or a modification in the limit of the constellation ? I'm still looking for more information. Also pinging the creator @Poulpy: who might tell us more. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 17:01, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Edit: I found what seems to be a confirmation on the footnote ‡ of page 402 in An account of John Flamsteed the first royal astronomer ( https://books.google.fr/books?id=fJk_AAAAcAAJ&pg=PA402 ) which says:
« 15 Cancri [our 15 Cancri (Q4029002)], which is called ψ by Flamsteed, is ψ Geminorum [our Psi Geminorum (Q27638501)] ».
The question now is how we deal with that: keep the duplicate (like we do for some vernacular name of species) or merge? I guess we can close this RFD and open a talk on Wikidata:WikiProject Astronomy. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 17:20, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request[edit]

False claims, no notabiliy Pleclown (talk) 11:43, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

@Assyhottin: Some of these items doesn't have any enough statements to identify the subject and most of them doesn't have references for claims. Since all these items were created by you, your input will be helpful. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 15:19, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Or we could just delete them all. If they are important, they will be made by someone else in the future. Quakewoody (talk) 14:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete Apparent hoax. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 19:15, 19 August 2019 (UTC).

Q37109668[edit]

MacHin (Q37109668): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unused, seems to be a miscapitalized form of Q66305881 --- Jura 17:16, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
BTW, please don't merge the two spellings. --- Jura 16:24, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66310846[edit]

Jessica Yaniv waxing case (Q66310846): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty (article on enwiki has been deleted Randykitty (talk) 15:10, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:20, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
  • But the Korean wikipedia article exists Quakewoody (talk) 14:49, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
    • Korean Wikinews, to be exact —94rain (talk) 03:09, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Q54021689[edit]

Τέττιξ και μύρμηκες (Q54021689): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merged with Q1211051 Kolega2357 (talk) 05:40, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:50, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Noooooo!!!!! (in despair) - please never, ever, merge a literary work (Q7725634) with a version, edition, or translation (Q3331189)... which is totally wrong ! please read Wikidata:WikiProject Books to learn about cataloguing works and editions... this is how a single work can be linked to all its different editions and translations on all projects...
@Kolega2357: The Ant and the Grasshopper (Q1211051) is the work, version, edition, or translation (Q3331189) is one of its editions, on elwikisource
I restored the last OK version of Q54021689... --Hsarrazin (talk) 07:39, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
@Kolega2357: in fact, you added 3 linguistic works s:sr:Cvrčak_i_mrav, s:li:De Aomezeiker enne Graashopper and s:ru:Стрекоза и муравьи (Эзоп; Лев Толстой), but the first 2 have NO author indication on the wikisource... are you sure they are Esope's translations ? or La Fontaine's ? or another version ?  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hsarrazin (talk • contribs) at 07:53, 12 August 2019 (UTC).

Yes I am merged. --Kolega2357 (talk) 07:45, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Q306966[edit]

Eastern equine encephalitis virus (Q306966): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I tried to add french language ref. (Virus de l'encéphalite équine de l'Est) to the English page, got a save failure --Dasilvj (talk) 13:04, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
fr:Virus de l'encéphalite équine de l'Est is linked o this item, the english one is in Q18553951. The english article , though, is en:Eastern equine encephalitis, but Q306966 should contain Eastern equine encephalitis virus and merging cannot be done because there are two categories on Commons, one for the virus, and one for the other. - сyсn - (talkcontribslogs) 14:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Better to have both objects anyway. --SCIdude (talk) 14:27, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66451742[edit]

eighth power (Q66451742): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Vandalism done by sock IP of Xayahrainie43. Not notable mathematics principal and no Wikipedia pages linked. Tigerzeng (talk) 07:36, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:40, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Q9026849[edit]

The song Maggie May's Français, Norsk and Svenska pages cannot be linked to the main page. I do not know how to fix this. Can anyone help ? JeanPaulGRingault (talk) 14:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Q21987455[edit]

Protein Q300 (Q21987455): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The only reference UniProt has made their item obsolete (without giving reason, see the UniProt link) --SCIdude (talk) 14:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66058194[edit]

Kirsten Stein (Q66058194): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty. De-article was deleted. --Dandelo (talk) 09:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:10, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66316892[edit]

Heidi Lavon (Q66316892): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty. De-article was deleted. --Dandelo (talk) 11:55, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66385292[edit]

Paranoid Internet GmbH (Q66385292): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted as "spam" a couple of days ago, and restored after (slightly noisy) complaint/request, in order to turn into notable item. @Paranoidsu: No edits since then. IMHO promotional. --Lymantria (talk) 17:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66442800[edit]

Aharon Atzmon is an Israely mathematician. Works in harmonic analysis and operator theory. Professor Emeritus Tel Aviv University. (Q66442800): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item David (talk) 06:45, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Q19366185[edit]

Red Rock (Q19366185): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Hoax, this 'mountain' does not exist. Has been recently deleted in four wikipedias, see: en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Rock (Gambia), de:Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/27. Juli 2019#Red Rock (Gambia) (gelöscht), es:Wikipedia:Consultas de borrado/Red Rock (Gambia), pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2019:08:04:Red Rock (Gambia). --2003:C6:F3A:E200:F30:92D9:D10:2FCF 12:10, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:20, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Q18542441[edit]

Madeleine McCann (Q18542441): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item (Q18542441) is the same as Q639251. It was actually my first time trying to add a link to a different language which obviously failed, and I believe these two items need to be merged. --Kgoodluck (talk) 05:34, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:40, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
They can't be merged as some wiki's have articles in both items. - сyсn - (talkcontribslogs) 12:13, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66312852[edit]

Siavash Shahsavari (Q66312852): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy David (talk) 12:40, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66380876[edit]

SiavashShahsavari (Q66380876): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy David (talk) 12:40, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Q22876930[edit]

Q22876930: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I just move the Wikipedia:Vi:Bản_mẫu:Armin_van_Buuren from Q22876930 to Q8283748 (manually delete then manually add). --Minh Tấn (talk) 14:18, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Q12213744[edit]

Q12213744: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicated and do not accept merging (Q28220393) FShbib (talk) 16:33, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Q42194096[edit]

Paul III and His Grandsons Ottavio and Cardinal Alessandro Farnese (Q42194096): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notification, no EB link Oursana (talk) 16:45, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Q63993808[edit]

Hossein Daramad (Q63993808): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, no sitelinks outside of a Commons category named for the editor that created it. Not useful as it just links a bunch of social media accounts together. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:09, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request[edit]

  1. Q66605052 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q66605053 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q66605055 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q66605057 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q66605062 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q66605077 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q66605095 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Duplicate from existing elements with other names Superzerocool (talk) 20:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Please give the item ID. --110.54.139.241 00:10, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66606241[edit]

Joél Filsaime (Q66606241): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N. Part of decade long LTA promo spam campaign (see w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Prince-au-Léogâne/Archive). Currently linked to, please hold pending deletion discussions. Hiàn (talk) 11:59, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

  • I agree with the delete. But I disagree with the suggestion that we wait for simple.wikipedia to resolve their discussion. In this instance, for this particular repeat vandal, for the integrity of Wikidata, we need to not follow the rule that says we need to wait. We already know how the discussion is going to end. We should delete this item immediately. That discussion is in error, it never should have been started in the first place, the article should have been immediately deleted. Also, the information on that article has made its way to Google search results, and is currently being replicated on sites that clone Wikipedia (plus the sites that J-Pimp is spamming with the addition of the Wikipedia/Wikidata links). We need to end it sooner rather than later. Quakewoody (talk) 16:15, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Point of reference - the article was deleted immediately, but then the deleting admin had a change of heart and thought a discussion was warranted (which is where there error occurred). Quakewoody (talk) 16:15, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66606241[edit]

Joél Filsaime (Q66606241): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Request SPEEDY DELETE from this LTA, cross-wiki vandal. Item has been deleted numerous times from Wikidata (in various forms - legal name, artist name, record label, etc). I am already aware that this item is linked to simple.wikipedia, but due to a comedy of errors, it was deleted but then brought back and a discussion was started instead. Get rid of this item. Block the editor, get a check user to block the ip that created the account. And, while I am at it, go to simple.wikipedia and vote on the deletion discussion. --Quakewoody (talk) 12:31, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Q1788171[edit]

A.S. Siracusa Calcio 1924 (DEPRECATED) (Q1788171): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There are really a messed up heritage of a football club which multi legal persons claiming as successor. New item had replaced Q1788171 as Associazione Sportiva Siracusa (Q39052565), A.S.D. Città di Siracusa (Q4647072) and U.S. Siracusa (Q28195113). Fourth item to be created for yet another legally unrelated team A.S.D. Città di Siracusa for 2012-13 season. --Matthew hk (talk) 19:33, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Q55619461[edit]

list of original programs distributed by Disney streaming service (Q55619461): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Linked article no longer exists Trivialist (talk) 02:39, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66630976[edit]

Q66630976: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item Sintakso (talk) 05:22, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66628402[edit]

PITAKA (Q66628402): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item / spam Sintakso (talk) 05:31, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66628248[edit]

gearlegends (Q66628248): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item Sintakso (talk) 05:31, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66626394[edit]

CCKD (Q66626394): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item David (talk) 07:02, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66624482[edit]

Q66624482: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item David (talk) 07:02, 21 August 2019 (UTC)