User talk:Jasper Deng

From Wikidata
Jump to: navigation, search
Wikidata-logo-en.svg

Welcome to Wikidata, Jasper Deng!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike, and you can help. Go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familarise yourself with:

If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Regards, --Ajraddatz (talk) 19:18, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for my signature[edit]

Sorry if my signature offended you. I understand that canvassing is very innapropiate.

I edit my signature and delete the maximum of link.

thanks for you're remark. --Jitrixis (talk) 02:33, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Interwikilinks vs. items[edit]

Hi Jasper, I'm new to Wikidata. What should I do with different items that are connected through an interwiki link? A historical society Q38750 is not the same as a yearbook Q38788 (deleted as "Duplicate: of Q38750"), published by this society. I think the best solution are two items or a kind of redirect. --87.189.121.229 02:44, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

I've restored the deleted one. The two looked similar enough based on the German. Sorry! (by the way, you're encouraged to register).--Jasper Deng (talk) 03:10, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick response! --Media watch (talk) 04:53, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Sparrows[edit]

Please note: Wikidata:Requests for deletions#Q30010. --Art-top (talk) 07:02, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

patrol right[edit]

I've thanked the wrong person, so thank you for asking on bugzilla! :)

Best regards — Arkanosis 11:34, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Empty item[edit]

Thanks for pointing that out, must have made it by mistake somehow. I think i't because I pressed the Enter key twice by accident while I was typing a description. I've filled the item with something else now. Thanks again for pointing it out. Delsion23 (talk) 23:05, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I have thus declined the request for its deletion at WD:RFD.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Q49907[edit]

Hi Jasper Deng, you have deleted Q49907 because you thought it is a duplicated entry with Q29416. It is not. See Wikidata:Forum#Ein Artikel, mehrere Personen (though in German) for details. Basicly Q29416 is about Alfons Kontarsky, Q49742 is about Aloys Kontarsky and Q49907 was about both of them, the siblings Alfons und Aloys Kontarsky. --Alex (talk) 10:29, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Restored. I'm not convinced we need an entry on both, though. This seems to vary based on Wikipedia language.--Jasper Deng (talk) 18:01, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
I am not sure either. I picked it up as an example where there is an article about a group of people in one language version, and one for each member in another one. There might be a lot of other cases alike (see e.g., en:Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Redirect to joint biography). And the problem might not be restricted to persons. --Alex (talk) 18:40, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
I don't know why some Wikipedias do articles on two things that are covered separately elsewhere, but this is indeed a problem, indeed not just restricted to persons.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:44, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Well, I guess that is due to something like a “language bias”. The English Wikipedia might be an exemption (as English serves as the lingua franca of our days), but even there Aloys and Alfons Kontarsky are perceived as a duet, not as single persons. This is (or at least might be) different to an audience that consists mainly of German speaking people. --Alex (talk) 19:55, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Exactly. The problem is that different entries on Wikidata can't share such an article. And I don't think that if we had a single entry on both, that we could link separate articles in one language.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:56, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Yes, at least not at this stage of Wikidata. Someday it might be possible to get the data from Q49742 and Q29416 at Q49907 (or vice versa), so that there is some connection between these entries. --Alex (talk) 20:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Main Page protection[edit]

Fair enough I certainly won't contest you changing the protection, but prophylactic protection of the Main Page seems like a given to me. Thanks for the note. —Justin (koavf)TCM 06:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Barack Obama[edit]

Sorry, didn't notice Barack Obama already existed. It didn't appear in the search results. 116.203.36.34 05:41, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Special:ItemDisambiguation helps, but the existing search function is indeed very horrible. No fault of yours.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrolling[edit]

Thanks. :)--Avocato (talk) 20:18, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks![edit]

This is a little late but thank you for entrusting me with the autopatrolled user right. --J36miles (talk) 22:21, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Explain?[edit]

Hi Jasper--what did you mean by this edit? —Theopolisme 21:36, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

When a user is blocked and tries to submit a change to a data entry like changing a site link, a dialog box "Edit not allowed" appears. When "details" is clicked, the bare wikitext of that interface page, not the formatted message it's supposed to generate, is shown to the user. Without this edit, the first thing they'd see is the CSS/table markup, not the actual "You are currently unable to edit Wikidata" message.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:06, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying! —Theopolisme 11:50, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Admin confirmations[edit]

Hello! We are currently in the process of confirming all of the early admins, and you are scheduled to be confirmed between 2 - 6 February 2013. Please create an entry at Wikidata:Administrators/Confirm 2013/3, and see Wikidata:Administrators/Confirm 2013 for more details. Merci et bonne journée! Ajraddatz (Talk) 03:14, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Création d'une task force Chimie[edit]

Hello, Je voulais t'annoncer la création d'une task force dédiée à la chimie Wikidata:Chemistry task force. Snipre (talk) 16:05, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Merci!--Jasper Deng (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Cape Krustenstern[edit]

I appear to have borked what should be "Cape Krusenstern National Monument" (Q5280756). I moved it on en from its original cumbersome title of "Cape Krusenstern National Monument and Archeological District" (Q2937254)and didn't realize that the second title already existed here, created the first, so now we have two. I'm not autoconfirmed so I can't move it, and in any case the first title would need to be deleted first. Not being quite sure of how things work on WD myself (obviously), can you sort it out? Acroterion (talk) 21:18, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello. As for as I know, you don't need to be autoconfirmed to rename items, as we don't use page moving for them. One problem with Wikidata is that what's multiple articles on one wiki is a single article on another.
In this particular case, you can edit the title of the latter entry. Duplicate detection is sometimes hard, but Special:ItemDisambiguation and Special:ItemByTitle are helpful. I'm not sure of exactly what you'd like here (deletion of the first one, perhaps?), but what I'd do is delete Q5280756 and replace the link(s) at Q2937254. Cheers.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:59, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Yes, it appears that the one I created, Q5280756,should be the one that gets deleted, and then I'll edit Q2937254. I can't alter Q2937254 until Q5280756's gone - I get a conflict message. Acroterion (talk) 00:59, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Q5280756 has now been deleted, so everything should be OK now.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, much appreciated. Acroterion (talk) 01:15, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

Wikidata barnstar.svg The admin's barnstar
Congrats on passing 100 blocks! — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 21:53, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Template:Talkback[edit]

Can you enable this template Template:Talkback for be translated? --Vivaelcelta (talk) 08:58, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

I'll take a look at doing that later today. You can also do it - follow the instructions at Template:Autotranslate.--Jasper Deng (talk) 18:30, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

A question[edit]

Hi Jasper. We have this and this pages about the same article. When I try to add Turkish interwiki to the first one, it gives me an error. Is there a way to fix it?--Rapsar (talk) 10:00, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Re:Wikidata admin confirmations[edit]

Hi! Thanks for information. Now, I have a many work in my live, that, I had decrease my activity in all wikimedia projects to april. However, I will make every effort to comply with its obligation. Best regards, Karol007 talk 18:04, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

RE: Autopatrolled and rollbacker flag[edit]

Here's an explanation of the Serbian Wikipedia, I blocked under various charges for which there is not the slightest evidence. --Kolega2357 (talk) 20:29, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

I'm going to seek others' comment on this before I make a final decision.--Jasper Deng (talk) 16:47, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Serbian Wikipedia has nothing to do with Wikidata, This is completely irrelevant to what you're doing. --Kolega2357 (talk) 18:42, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

No. It factors into whether you can be trusted with any permissions.--Jasper Deng (talk) 18:59, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
We have the right to consider your record on other WMF sites in our decision to grant you rights here. --Rschen7754 19:31, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

User page items[edit]

Why can not I be on the user pages on Wikidata? --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:10, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

It's subject of current discussion - see the project chat. The original consensus was that it would be of little/no benefit and that it's out of Wikidata's project scope.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:11, 28 March 2013 (UTC)


Commenting on talk page[edit]


image « Fair Use » suivre les règles WMF[edit]

Je ne comprends pas. C'est une préoccupation WMF, et non les Commons. Les Commons ne fait que suivre les règles WMF. Wikpedia en pouvez mettre en place « Fair Use » (avec un « Fair Use » justification pour chaque utilisation) parce que c'est la loi aux États-Unis, mais les Commons ne peut pas parce qu'il est dans le monde entier. WMF est très préoccupé par les violations du droit d'auteur. Toutes ces images sont Cover Art et sont sous copywright. WMF ne peut pas soutenir violoation droits d'auteur.Merci, Farrajak (talk) 13:58, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Ces sont juste liens, pas utilisations, donc il n'est pas obligataire à mettre rationales.--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:08, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

RequestDeletion[edit]

I don't see how this was controversial. It just gives every user (unregistered users included) the ability to tag items easiliy for quick deletion, like it is possible on every other WMF wiki with the {{delete}} template. This is normally standard. Any admin/registered user who dislikes having the RequestDeletion link in his toolbar can still easily opt-out via his preferences. Regards, Vogone talk 04:43, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

I would be fine if it were off for admins by default. That's the main reason why I reverted you. A second reason was that I also didn't know why you did that because of your lack of an edit summary.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:27, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Okay, the thing with the lack of an edit summary was indeed my fault. I'll document my changes better, next time. Greetings, Vogone talk 15:21, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Properties for review[edit]

I saw that you contribute to the chemistry task force. Do you have time to look at Crystal habit, Twinning, Fracture and Cleavage? (link) --Tobias1984 (talk) 17:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm not that advanced.--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:04, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Talk page reverting[edit]

Hi Jasper,

Please avoid reverting other users comments on your talk page. This is unfriendly and makes your warnings on other users talk pages appear some sort of retaliation and suggesting misuse of your admin privileges. --  Docu  at 20:53, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

I can remove comments from my own talk page as I wish. Yes, it may be unfriendly, but I'm not interested in comments like the one you posted.--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:00, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Ahh .. and then you complain about other users not listening to you .. --  Docu  at 21:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
That's not plural users, that's singular user - the discussion is about your conduct, not mine.--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

User:Aristomenis12[edit]

Hi

You posted another warning to this user's talk page. Why not indefblock? You've probably seen that he/she made strange edits before, this is one more strange edit. I'd think it enough for a block. --Michgrig (talk) 06:24, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

The goal of a block is to stop disruption. If a warning accomplishes that, as it seems to have here, a block is not necessary.--Jasper Deng (talk) 18:15, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

RfC on Wikidata's primary sorting property[edit]

You recently participated in a deletion discussion for P107 - main type (GND). The discussion has been closed, as it is clear that a resolution won't come from PfD, and an RfC has been opened on the matter at Wikidata:Requests for comment/Primary sorting property. You are invited to participate there. Please note that this is a mass delivered message, and that I will not see any replies you leave on this page.

Yours, Sven Manguard Wha? 18:28, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

RfP Micru[edit]

A month has passed and he has done some more reviews. What do you think? Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Other_rights#Micru. --Tobias1984 (talk) 09:19, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

I would say if (s)he wants the right, (s)he should open a new request, as when a {{not done}} is placed, the decision for that request is usually final.--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello![edit]

Hello Jasper, I decided to join the data wiki, and I must say I really like the place! Im a bt concerned with my edits, I haven't had anyone comment about what I do and how I work, is there something I'm not doing or am I causing more harm than good? Hope to hear from you when you are free. Thanks! --Prabash (talk) 00:32, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

A quick glance shows that they are probably fine, and I've assigned you autopatrolled. However, keep in mind that descriptions are more like dictionary definitions, and thus you generally only specify the "thing" a particular item is (for example, an American national park is simply described as a "United States national park"). Best of luck!--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:57, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Oh ok so we do not go in detail with the description, I'll hop back and simplify the descriptions into a more dictionary like format. thanks for the help Jasper, really appreciate it! --Prabash (talk) 01:23, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

Hi Jasper Deng,

I saw that you are a sysop here and had some questions about my entries. First thing is, am I doing a good job/are they helping? I want to make sure that my contributions are helping. If you could tell me how I am doing or what must be changed, feel free to. Best. WorldTraveller101 (talk) 18:11, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

I can't really check your foreign-language contributions - remember to keep in mind TCN7JM's advice on your talk page.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:06, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, that was a slight, minor mix up that was easily fixed, albeit I sight necessity for the expression of caution. Happy editing. WorldTraveller101 (talk) 21:00, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Re: Flood flag, again[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Jasper Deng. You have new messages at Ricordisamoa's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Ricordisamoa 19:37, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

not vandalising[edit]

Hello. I wasn't vandalising, I was fixing incorrect links between different language wikipedias (rep by pop and representation are two different things, as well there was a link to the romanian article on proportional representation which is once again a wholly different subject). Rather silly accusation, I don't see who would vandalise such a specific page on this Wiki. Please undo your revert, thanks.--74.15.187.152 04:46, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, usually mass-removal of links is construed to be vandalism. However, I have removed only two links because the rest appear to be related.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:50, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Right, my bad, I only should have deleted those two. Cheers, Methegreat on wikipedia fr & en. --74.15.187.152 04:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Autopatroller Request[edit]

Hi Jasper. I am here to ask if you can give me the autopatroller user right here. I would need the autopatroller user right as I would want my edits to be autopatrolled when I revert off new editors removing sitelinks. I have been here for a while. I hope that you would grant me the autopatroller user right here. I have it on Commons. Thanks. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Actually, autopatrolled was very recently phased out. You should be autopatrolled already though, because you're autoconfirmed.--Jasper Deng (talk) 09:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
I actually saw that requesting for the autopatroller user right was removed from Wikidata:Requests for permissions, so I asked here instead. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:08, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
That's because it was phased out - i.e., unavailable now.--Jasper Deng (talk) 11:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Contributions seem good. I have given you 'confirmed' as the step in which gives autpatrolled rights as well as allowing the rights of an autoconfirmed user. John F. Lewis (talk) 22:20, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
I won't fuss over it, but because he's autoconfirmed (first edit over a month ago, over 80 edits), I think that's redundant.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:57, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Do you think I am fit for the rollback right? I have made a lot of reverts using 'restore' and I know how Wikidata works. I find that the restore button have a glitch. When I try to revert some edits, an error message comes out. So I think I might get the rollback right. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:40, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
I'd like to see more counter-vandalism activity here first.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:53, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Like until how much? 200 or 300? I have 100+ now. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:03, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
I'm more concerned about how much time you've spent here on countervandalism - tomorrow is probably good enough.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
I have did a lot of valid reverts yesterday and today. Can you give me the rollback right? Or should I ask at WD:RFOR? Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
It's done. It may be quicker to request it at RFOR next time.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:56, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

93.115.94.85[edit]

Thanks for blocking them. I was watching their edits, but it looks like you got to it first. --Jakob (Scream about the things I've broken) 02:14, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Don't hesitate to block spambots of this kind. See Special:AbuseFilter/5.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:19, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:History[edit]

Hello! I just found Template:Purge for MediaWiki action=purge and created Template:History for MediaWiki action=history. Please semi-protect the template, add the required .css class historylink if not already available. I am a newbie here. Maybe you can create / review and semi-protect the required Template:History/doc based on Template:Purge/doc (which needs to be created first) as well. Thanks in advance! @לערי_ריינהאר

לערי ריינהארט (talk) 08:22, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Plesase note the existence of Template:Property/doc and Template:P/doc versus Template:Q/doc. לערי ריינהארט (talk) 08:47, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Where can I get the CSS code?--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Special:AbuseFilter/5[edit]

Why did you make this modification to the abuse filter? The xzork.com site has been used by several vandals so far, see [1], [2], [3], and [4]. --Jakob (Scream about the things I've broken) 00:26, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your regex syntax was incorrect. \b means word separation, because \ followed by a letter is special.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Rezabot[edit]

You can probably Nuke all items this bot created.--GZWDer (talk) 06:02, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm going to wait for an all-clear because this will involve the deletion of a large amount of items, which could cause a problem with the database.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:04, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
OK, I'm doing it gradually.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:18, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
There are so many to delete, I won't proceed beyond this point because I fear that it might cause irrepairable damage to the database. I will wait for more comments or let others do it.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:29, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

unblock[edit]

Hi, please unblock Rezabot. It works on many local wikis and this blocking will cause many problems in local wikis.

now importing that templates are stopped and we can talk about them. yoursYamaha5 (talk) 06:42, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
As I know template subpages which are not Wikidata:Notability means /doc pages not independent subpages which can have interwiki. these subpages should have interwiki because users can develop or review them by interwiki also in
  • Request for comment: Inclusion of non-article pages
  • Request for comment: Inclusion of non-article pages 2
  • Request for comment: Exclusion of pages in the file namespace

I didn't see any comment for these kind subpagesYamaha5 (talk) 06:51, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

That's what the policy says though. It does not restrict the prohibition to just /doc subpages. I do need confirmation from the bot operator (Reza1615) before I can unblock it.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:12, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
I am bot operator :) please see fa:user:yamaha5 and here. I changed my username because of some personal problems Yamaha5 (talk) 07:25, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Unblocked.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:29, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks I left a topic in the Wikidata:Project chat . please leave a comment thereYamaha5 (talk) 07:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

link does not show up[edit]

Hi Jasper. I randomly clicked on your talk page for help. The article w:Asphalt shingle does not show an interlanguage link to it's German counterpart Preolitschindel so I went to add the link. However, I get the error message "Site link Preolitschindel is already used by item Q2108753...". How can I get the link to show up? Thanks. Jim Derby (talk) 03:29, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

You are possibly dealing with duplicate items. I would have to see the items in detail to make further comment.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:03, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
I made the article names above into links. Could you look at this problem? Thanks. Jim Derby (talk) 17:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
It does not seem that Q2108753 is a match for the German term you propose here, based on a Google Translate of the German.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
I click on the Q2108753 link and it goes to a page listing preolitschindel, I do not understand your last entry.Jim Derby (talk) 01:00, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
I meant that Q2108753 does not match the item on asphalt shingles.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

ELO rating (P1087)[edit]

Just created ELO rating (P1087). --Tobias1984 (talk) 07:19, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Request for feedback on my GSoC'14 proposal[edit]

Hi Jasper Deng,

I am planning to work on the project titled "Tools for mass migration of legacy translated wiki content" this summer under Google Summer of Code. I have drafted a proposal for the same over the past few weeks. This project is going to help the translation adminstrators like you in a great way, as it would completely automate the tedious manual task of preparing a page for translation and then importing the translations into the Translate extension. You can check the proposal page for detailed information on how I plan to accomplish this.

As you would be an end user of this tool, it would be great if you could go through the proposal and provide feedback/suggestions. Your feedback would definitely help me improve the proposal as well help in creating an even better tool. You can do the same on the discussion page of the proposal or reply here, whichever is convenient for you. I look forward to hearing from you! Thank you!

P.S: I need to submit the proposal to Google by March 19, 2014.

BPositive (talk) 13:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello. I usually don't do translation administrator work, sorry.--Jasper Deng (talk) 16:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Jesmion (talkcontribslogs)[edit]

Just to let you know, he continued his disruptive behaviour today despite promising to behave, so I've reinstated the original block. ElfjeTwaalfje (talk) 17:03, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Q15136093[edit]

I oppose your deletion of Q15136093. You seem to have treated the matter as a vote, rather than considering the weight of argument. Furthermore, your summary claims only two editors in support of keeping the item; you overlooked the view of User:AdamBMorgan that it met Wikidata's eligibility criteria. Your action has also stifled debate of important issues about the interpretation of the notability policy. The item should be restored and the discussion reopened. If people then want the item deleted, a proper deletion proposal should be made. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:26, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

He has stifled no debate of important issues - if you want to promote yourself, look elsewhere. Your wikilawyering and general style of unproductive discussion is not helpful, and this is a trend on enwiki as well. If you want to contribute here, instead of spending a lot of time trying to have an item about yourself, try patrolling the new items and adding statements to them, or anything else that is actually productive. Thanks, Ajraddatz (talk) 14:47, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Per Ajraddatz. I did carefully consider the arguments here, but in the end, it is ultimately not fair to the community when such an overwhelming majority agrees with arguments in favor of deletion.--Jasper Deng (talk) 16:43, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Had you "carefully considered" the arguments, you would not have deleted the item while those important issues were still unresolved. And you would not have made a 50% error in your counting. There was no "overwhelming majority". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
OK I didn't see the comment, but still if you insist on a headcount it is about 8 supporting deletion and 3 opposing. It doesn't mean there wasn't consensus that your item did not meet notability. General discussion of notability can always occur, feel free to start one at project chat about notability in general, but @Pigsonthewing: you aren't going to get your item back either way (i.e. you should quit forum shopping about your item in particular). Basically, you are not notable and your self-promotion is inappropriate. If you do ever become notable, you will not be the person who creates it, since you have a glaring conflict of interest. You really do need to drop the stick on this issue. I'm not going to restore the item regardless of anything you post on my talk page, unless and until it can be unambiguously shown that you meet the notability policy. The general spirit of the notability policy is that Wikipedia finds you notable, which it doesn't. It's a bit early to point to en:WP:IDHT but your current attitude is heading towards that.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:03, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Painting this is me "promoting myself" is both untrue and - like the rest of your ad hominem personal attack - unacceptable. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Let's look at the definition of what an "ad hominem personal attack" is. From the page on enwiki on that subject, "a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the person presenting the claim". The key word there is irrelevant; the fact that you are trying to have an item on yourself undeleted is entirely relevant because it is a conflict of interest, and gives context to why you would be so interested in undeleting an item in a way that is clearly against policy or the spirit of the policy here. I'd recommend that you avoid labelling comments by others as personal attacks. Ajraddatz (talk) 21:03, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Painting this is me "promoting myself" is ... untrue Then why push so hard to get an item about you? I am a writer with several published books and some awards under my belt and I don't give a damn about having an item about me. Even so, I wouldn't care if the community decides that I should not have an item. Why there seems to be such a great level of care from you about this? My impression is that, unlike you state, you are indeed here to promote yourself, and your recent behaviour only reinforces this view. — ΛΧΣ21 00:30, 17 April 2014 (UTC)