Shortcut: WD:AN

Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Administrators' noticeboard
This is a noticeboard for matters requiring administrator attention. IRC channel: #wikidataconnect
On this page, old discussions are archived. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at 2022/05.

Requests for deletions

high

~146 open requests for deletions.

Requests for unblock

low

1 open request for unblock.

Italian (and French) vandal[edit]

Hi,
An anonymous user (I do not have his full history on it:) has been repeatedly reverted and blocked on it: and fr: for introducing typographic errors and refusing to abide to agreed upon rules (usually appearing within the 31.191.*.* range cf. https://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=STIPEL&action=history and https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Telecom_Italia_France&action=history). He's trying to dodge his blocking and modify the typography on wikidata (the latest appearances are 31.191.231.157 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · checkuser (log)), 31.191.246.195 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · checkuser (log)), 31.191.204.87 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · checkuser (log))). He has recently created an account AP22FROMIT (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · checkuser (log)) pursuing his modifications. I ask for his blocking. Thanks, (:Julien:) (talk) 08:18, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

in reality it is @(:Julien:) who insists on entering the wrong name of the companies, despite the fact that I have cited the sources and despite the fact that on his talk page I have indicated the correct name and my reasons. AP22FROMIT (talk) 13:12, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
moreover, after explaining the reasons on his talk page, he never replied to me, interrupting any possibility of clarification between me and him. AP22FROMIT (talk) 13:15, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is the known Vodafone vandal who gets continuously reported here. --Dorades (talk) 09:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re-adding this section after its automatic archival. I want some human to take responsibility and say "we're not gonna do jack shit abt the Vodafone vandal". (:Julien:) (talk) 05:51, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that cooperation with the user(s) is highly problematic and almost impossible.--Jklamo (talk) 21:58, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pierre Martins[edit]

Hello. On Wikidata:Property proposal/ANR project ID, there was a massive canvassing, with a lot of new editors (even some not registered, details of these users here) voting. I took the decision to strike these votes and to explain the reason on two different places: on the property proposal and on the French project chat where a related discussion was open. Laboratoire LAMOP (talkcontribslogs) aggressively replied, accusing me of having stopped the discussion, and not assuming my good faith, stating that I showed disdain to their work. I took the time to explain more in details my position. In the mean time, I also took the time to review the property proposal, improve it and support it. A few days later, Pierre Martins (talkcontribslogs) made another reply, full of sarcasms, passive-aggressive and personal attacks ("cher Envlh", "tout le monde n'est pas forcément dans un logique narcissique de reconnaissance en utilisant son nom et son prénom comme profil", "je considère votre action comme un caprice.", "Tout votre discours n'est qu'un prétexte pour jouir de votre pouvoir de nuisance.", etc.). He also stated that he is the one behind the account Laboratoire LAMOP (talkcontribslogs) and that he uses several other accounts. To sum up:

I would like the user to be warned and the discussion to go on more constructively and more peacefully, without personal attacks when someone meets contradiction. Cheers, — Envlh (talk) 14:11, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since I'm mentionned here on the French project chat, I must say that Laboratoire LAMOP/Pierre Martins reaction is clearly far from ideal. And the second reaction here is even worse. I leave admins decide but at the very least, we should warn him not to react like that and a symbolic short-term could be useful to mark this bad behaviour. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 10:15, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Envlh, VIGNERON: je l'ai averti sur sa page utilisateur. Pamputt (talk) 06:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Pamputt @VIGNERON
j'ai proposé une propriété lié à l'ESR pour à la suite d'une journée d'étude sur WIKIDATA pour prolonger l'intérêt de cette communauté. Cette propriété aurait pu être un exemple idéal. Une demande d'accompagnement dans cette création a été effectué sur le Bistro pour pouvoir bien respecter toutes les étapes. J'en ai parlé sur une mailing liste de l'ESR et plusieurs personnes qui me sont inconnus ont donc notifié leur interêt par leur vote.
Par la suite, Envl a bloqué tous les votes de façon unilatérale et brutale, fait rebasculer le statut de la propriété de Create à Under Discussion. Ma procédure etant transparente, Envl aurait pu interroger sur Bistro sur les raisons de cet afflux dans un dialogue mais il ne l'a pas fait.
J'ai tenté des explications et demandé de retourner à un dialogue serein.
En réponse, Enlv m'a répondu dans ce que je crois être une attaque personnelle en évoquant mes sophismes et mon simili chantage (chose que j'ai évidemment mal pris).
Il me semble qu'à aucun moment ma bonne foi n'a été pris en compte.
Mes messages n'ont pas été approprié mais la méthode choisie par Envl et ses réponses non plus.
Pierre Martins (talk) 08:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Pierre Martins: je ne doute pas que l'intention de départ soit bonne et la propriété sera sans doute acceptée, mais la méthode elle n'était pas bonne. Notamment en terme de transparence, au moment où j'écris ces mots, n'est pas respectée ; notamment, les comptes Laboratoire LAMOP (talkcontribslogs) et Pierre Martins (talkcontribslogs) n'indique toujours pas qu'il s'agit de la même personne comme le demande Wikidata:Alternate accounts. En plus de cela, les votes en masse de nouveaux contributeurs n'est pas une bonne pratique et Envlh (talkcontribslogs) a totalement eu raison de retirer ces votes invalides, n'importe quel autre utilisateur habitué de Wikidata aurait fait de même. Enfin (et surtout), comme l'indique l'avertissement de Pamputt (talkcontribslogs), les attaques personnelles - quelle que soit la raison et sur l'ensemble des projets Wikimédia - ne sont pas acceptables et ne sont pas propices au « dialogue serein ». Maintenant, vous pouvez choisir de continuer à être braqué ou bien choisir de respecter les règles et le fonctionnement de Wikipédia, le choix est votre et le cas échéant, ce sera aux administrateurs d'intervenir si besoin. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Pierre Martins: si mon intervention a permis de faire revenir la discussion a un niveau plus sain, je considère que l'affaire est close. Je viens de créer identifiant de projet ANR(P10781) et vous pouvez donc commencer à l'utiliser Face-smile.svg. Pamputt (talk) 06:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User Block Request : Khalidkhan1900[edit]

Khalidkhan1900 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))
Promotional only account Rockpeterson (talk) 19:05, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User warned. Bovlb (talk) 18:26, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ameisenigel (talk) 06:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User block request: Bernardino Sidónio Mazive[edit]

Bernardino Sidónio Mazive (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))

Only vandalism. --HVL talk 23:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User warned. Bovlb (talk)
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ameisenigel (talk) 06:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:193.207.169.8[edit]

193.207.169.8 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: excessive vandalism on Cardi B (Q29033668) France3c0 (talk) 17:15, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done IP blocked for 31h, item semi-protected for another year. I'm seeing related problematic edits from several IPs in the /16, but also several IPs with good edits, so I'm not doing a range block at this time. Bovlb (talk) 18:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ameisenigel (talk) 06:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

page removed with no relevant reason[edit]

My wikidata page is removed and had all the right information which is relevant and connected to my German Advisor Professor's page. And it was supported with relevant information according to Mathematics Genealogy Project as an identifier. The wikidata page of my professor has a list of my colleagues and their wikidata pages that based on the same information on Mathematics Genealogy Project! I tried to justify the case to an Egyptian Editor called "باسم" with no hope.

Here is German Professor wikidata page: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q102197994

and this is the website of Mathematics Genealogy Project, that stated the relation between me as a doctoral and my German advisor/professor: https://www.mathgenealogy.org/id.php?id=158729

and showed the list of his doctoral students, and this is the page of my colleague: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q102378606

My deleted page ID is: Q102391128

I tried to restore or create it again with no hope as Egyptian editors are waiting for any content from Egypt to delete!!!

I hope to help me recover this and thank you!

Dr. Hussein Abdelfatah https://www.mathgenealogy.org/id.php?id=158729

Ping @باسم: as the admin who has deleted the item. --Ameisenigel (talk) 20:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ameisenigel: on ar.wiki we always suffer from users who create articles about themselves, or others, that doesn't meet the Notability standards. Many times these pages, as well as their items on Wikidata, aim at confirming the authenticity of their pages on social media or maybe increase search results related to them. Once we delete their pages we also delete its related item on Wikidata. Ping @علاء: for more clarification. By the way, both of us are not Egyptians Face-smile.svg-- باسم (talk) 20:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is still not clear why the pages are deleted, as the included information are valid and relevant to resources?!
Please justify the cases separately, I am not responsible for others' behavior who misused the wikidata or wikipedia on their social media or for increasing searching results as you mentioned!
Please, if you find the information provided are true, restore the pages without discrimination!
Thanks. HusseinAbdelfatah (talk) 20:58, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@HusseinAbdelfatah did you read Wikidata Notability policy? Do you find the criteria applicable to you? --Alaa :)..! 21:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dear علاء
Really I am disappointed, you can check out many wikidata and wikipedia pages and decide in comparison to my deleted pages, which of them should be deleted!!!
Thanks HusseinAbdelfatah (talk) 21:25, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
These were not the result of users creating articles about themselves; they were part of an import from Mathematics Genealogy Project between 18 November and 2 December 2020 of items not connected to Wikipedia articles. Current uses are 97% complete according to Property talk:P549. Q3604202 (talk) 22:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@باسم: The case could be made that WD:N #2 notability is reached through GND ID (P227) (143504614, not present on the last version you deleted), a Wikidata property for an identifier that suggests notability (Q62589316) and the already mentioned Mathgenealogy link. --Emu (talk) 23:12, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you باسم
Can you help me in editing the deleted one or creating a new version using the resources you mentioned GND ID (P227) (143504614)?
Thanks HusseinAbdelfatah (talk) 11:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Emu HusseinAbdelfatah (talk) 11:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored Hussein Abdelfatah (Q102391128) as there seems to be consensus that it weakly meets the notability policy — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC) [reply]

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ameisenigel (talk) 06:21, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should Linked Data only be a 1 way street with Wikidata.org?[edit]

Do we begin to say that storing links inside Wikidata is unwanted and less effective and it is better to only point to Wikidata items/properties instead - making linked data a 1 way street?

There is a discussion on a user talk page https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User_talk:Ugochimobi#gratisdata.miraheze.org_spam that needs some thought on Wikidata's policies regarding "linked data and linking to external databases". I myself see gratisdata as one of just many federated Wikibase instances that continue to popup that start small and are trying to serve individual and specialized domains and then link back with Wikidata.org to fulfill linked data's mission.

Storing facts in Wikidata.org might raise concerns, but what about non-facts and metadata (linked data) around properties? Isn't knowing that 6 other Wikibase instances also share a similar property to Wikidata.org somewhat useful to many scientists and researchers? Especially if additional knowledge can be gathered from those other Wikibase instances? If we do not allow storing links inside Wikidata.org, then do we not run a risk of killing linked data altogether? Or is the answer NO we do not kill linked data because federated querying could help with reverse discovery completely? - I personally cannot say YES/NO to this question yet.

If we say in our recent talks, agendas, and mission that external Wikibase instances and databases can be useful fact stores then where do we draw the line of allowing them to store property links or not? If we disallow the practice then don't we ultimately ruin efforts of linked data's mission and discourage publishers from even beginning federated instances to carve out their own niche? Who determines that some external Wikibase instance or external database has "un-useful data" and thus is not notable and is denied storing metadata (linked data) in Wikidata.org?

What are the risks on both sides if linked data is only 1 way - only allowing pointing toward Wikidata.org and not allowing links to be stored inside Wikidata.org?

Let's think deeply about our fears and worries here, our own problems, and how some of our problems (growth) might be resolved or made worse by allowing or not allowing more linked data stored inside Wikidata.org -- Thadguidry (talk) 16:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Thadguidry: I've read this twice, and I have no idea what administrative action you are seeking here. Bovlb (talk) 16:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think the action I am asking for is a response in the users talk page to either:
1. an acknowledgement that @Multichill is correct in the user's talk page or
2. that he is incorrect and that external ontology links to properties that are equivalent are acceptable ( even if that external ontology is just starting out as a "pet project" thus far). Thadguidry (talk) 16:36, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Thadguidry: Thanks for clarifying. The user page now seems to have two experienced users agreeing with Multichill and no-one except you disagreeing, which should be of great assistance to you in discerning consensus in this matter. If you still believe that we should be linking to this project, then I suggest you propose a new property for it, which will allow a better discussion of the nature of the project and get you more feedback. Remember to link to prior discussions. Bovlb (talk) 18:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Bovlb. I'll push the wider discussion to the Wikidata Project Talk to get answers on the question of "Should Linked Data be a 1 way street with Wikidata.org and also ping our mailing list. -- Thadguidry (talk) 19:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ameisenigel (talk) 06:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User Block Request : Gaduls[edit]

Gaduls (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))
Engaged creating items which are not notable as well as promotional Rockpeterson (talk) 07:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked by Lymantria — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ameisenigel (talk) 06:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:188.85.205.220[edit]

188.85.205.220 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: [[1]] and his contributions. 🫡 𝘇𝘂 𝗜𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝗗𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻 Háblame! 13:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done I blocked the /24 for a year. Bovlb (talk) 16:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ameisenigel (talk) 06:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:86.199.110.44[edit]

86.199.110.44 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: His edits here 🫡 𝘇𝘂 𝗜𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝗗𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻 Háblame! 16:35, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done IP blocked for 31h. Bovlb (talk) 18:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ameisenigel (talk) 06:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spam notice[edit]

Please delete Q112117886 from mobile IP 41.116.99.41: It's spam.--Gina-Lisa Ofarim (talk) 19:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, thanks for reporting — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ameisenigel (talk) 06:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Maksummarsompel[edit]

Maksummarsompel (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism-only account. – LiberatorG (talk) 23:35, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked indefinitely. I see that they are blocked on many projects, so I'll look into a global block. Bovlb (talk) 02:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A global lock has been in progress since 2022-05-12. Bovlb (talk) 02:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And ✓ Done globally by AntiCompositeNumber. --Ameisenigel (talk) 06:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ameisenigel (talk) 06:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:1.42.14.80[edit]

1.42.14.80 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism. E.g. adding wrong sitelinks for hawwikipedia. --Nw520 (talk)

✓ Done globally by علاء. --Ameisenigel (talk) 06:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ameisenigel (talk) 06:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original research, Edit warring[edit]

On page Algirdas (Q336754), User:Guccee introduces his own coat of arms, passing it off as official. After the cancellation, he makes again the second and third time. On the Talk:Q336754 page, the main argument is that the image on the seal is automatically a coat of arms. Please pay attention to this page and the user actions. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 17:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Our discussion of the historical authenticity of coats of arms is not over yet, which means that you canceling my editions is just as unjustified. Please pay attention to the user who still deletes my edits despite the lack of consensus on this matter. Guccee (talk) 17:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Guccee: I don’t see any source for your claims. Seals do not necessarily contain coats of arms. Maybe they do in this case, but there needs to be a source. --Emu (talk) 18:07, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is a heraldic sign, so not yet a coat of arms. However, over time, heraldists created coats of arms from seal marks. The Polish historian Sławomir Górski described it more broadly, and another Polish historian - Juliusz Ostrowski - reworked the coats of arms himself in such a way as to fit the times in which he lived. I used this procedure in my case. I decided that the mark on Olgierd's two seals was his "calling card", to which I only added a heraldic shield.
  • First seal of Olgierd

  • Second seal of Olgierd

  • Graphics made by me

  • EXAMPLE:
  • Seals of the Czetwertyński Princes.jpg
  • POL COA Czetwertyński II Durasov.png
  • Guccee (talk) 18:33, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    @Guccee Let me be frank: You admit that those aren’t CoA in the first place. You admit that you used conjecture to create those images (“I used this procedure in my case”) and you even admit that you added a heraldic shield. I’m not at all saying that you are wrong in believing that the picture you created is the correct CoA (which would be foolish as I have no expertise whatsoever regarding CoA from this specific region in this specific time period and it wouldn’t be my role in this to even weigh in on the merits of the case), but there sure seems to be no proper source saying so, I’m sorry. --Emu (talk) 22:51, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Original research, Edit warring - 2[edit]

    Guccee (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))

    The user is waging an edit war (1, 2, 3), pushing his fantasy coat of arms into the article Gediminas (Q244852). --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 09:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    @Лобачев Владимир Those edits took place before I gave advice to said user on this very page. I see no need to create new topics as this is essentially the same problem, just with a different item. --Emu (talk) 10:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    OK! --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 10:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Emu: Do you intend to undo these edits? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 10:59, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Лобачев Владимир You can go ahead and delete improperly sourced statements. --Emu (talk) 10:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Emu: I deleted (1, 2). --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 11:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Edit war on some Northern Ireland-linked elements[edit]

    On elements James McClean (Q284784), Saoirse-Monica Jackson (Q64069704) and Jamie-Lee O'Donnell (Q68033055) some anonymous users are continuously adding Northern Ireland as "country of citizenship" but the correct value is United Kingdom. Me and some user have canceled these edits for quite some times, but the situation is now almost unbearable. I ask the protection of these elements.--Mannivu (talk) 13:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    ✓ Done Semi-protected for a month. --Ameisenigel (talk) 06:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ameisenigel (talk) 06:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Please semi-protect Seo Shin-ae (Q3658309)[edit]

    This item is getting heavily vandalized by anonymous users, and I think it's worth semi-protecting this item to prevent further disruption. --CrystalLemonade (talk) 08:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    ✓ Done Semprotected for 1 month. Lymantria (talk) 10:57, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Lymantria (talk) 10:57, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Report concerning User:Dfsds[edit]

    Dfsds (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism, possibly in conjunction with 158.99.1.19 and 186.139.129.251 (below) bdijkstra (overleg) 12:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Blocked 24 hours and asked question on talk page (just in case this was a misclick or something) — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Report concerning User:158.99.1.19[edit]

    158.99.1.19 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism, possibly in conjunction with Dfsds and 186.139.129.251 (above and below) bdijkstra (overleg) 12:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Blocked one week — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Report concerning User:186.139.129.251[edit]

    186.139.129.251 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Vandalism, possibly in conjunction with Dfsds and 158.99.1.19 (above) bdijkstra (overleg) 12:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. Last edit was a few days ago, and it seems they tried to self-revert — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Vandalism[edit]

    Please protect Q12127853: excessive vandalism.--Renvoy (talk) 16:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Protected for 3 months — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection for Q9036[edit]

    Please semi-protect Nikola Tesla (Q9036) - frequent IP vandalism, popular theme.--Jklamo (talk) 19:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done by Mahir256 — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection for Q112123608[edit]

    High traffic item --Trade (talk) 20:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    ✓ Done Semi-protected for a month (because of evidence of IP vandalism, not because of "high traffic"). Bovlb (talk) 23:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Report concerning User:2600:1702:10a0:5980:290d:70cb:e71b:ace[edit]

    12600:1702:10a0:5980:290d:70cb:e71b:ace (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: Posting threats about the perpetrator's (living) parents. --Trade (talk) 21:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Five minutes of vandalism seven hours ago is too stale, but I did revdel the threat. Bovlb (talk) 23:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    User Block Request : KateChic [edit]

    KateChic (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))
    Abusing on my talk page , got triggered because items created by him/her were eliminated for deletion. Also inspect 49.237.12.230 Rockpeterson (talk) 06:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC).[reply]

    I have deleted some of the non-notable items and left a warning on their talk page. Will monitor for response and further actions as necessary — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Blocked the IP for 3 days — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Please block 88.27.245.172[edit]

    88.27.245.172 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) has been quite today vandalizing a number of items. Was active doing the same thing March 25 & 28 as well as May 5 too.--Hjart (talk) 08:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done. —Hasley+ 13:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Report concerning User:107.77.207.200[edit]

    107.77.207.200 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))Reasons: edit warring, addition of unnecessary content EthanGaming7640 16:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]