Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard

Administrators' noticeboard

This is a noticeboard for matters requiring administrator attention.

• If you wish for something to be deleted, please use Wikidata:Requests for deletions.
• If you want to report a bug in Wikidata software, please use Wikidata:Report a technical problem or Phabricator.
• Matters not requiring administrator action should be raised at Project chat.
• Matters that may involve CheckUser should be raised at Wikidata:Requests for checkuser.
• To report vandalism on Wikidata, please click here.
• Please add {{section resolved|1=~~~~}} to resolved sections.

IRC channel: #wikidata^connect

Translate this header box!

Start a new discussion

On this page, old discussions are archived. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at 2026/02.

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day and sections whose oldest comment is older than 7 days.

Requests for deletions

high

_{~145 open requests for deletions.}

Requests for unblock

low

_{1 open request for unblock.}

Undeletion request: Q137886280 (DISTOPXICA)

Hi admins,

I request undeletion of Q137886280 (DISTOPXICA), which was deleted as “does not meet notability policy”. Conflict of interest: I’m associated with the subject (band member/representative). I will keep the item strictly factual and sourced, and I accept the community’s decision.

Notability / independent coverage (non-self-published): - Caracol Radio (Colombia): https://caracol.com.co/2026/01/21/arde-la-cancion-con-la-que-distopxica-cuestiona-la-violencia-y-el-uso-de-los-recursos-publicos/ - Colectivo Sonoro (Colombia): https://colectivosonoro.com/2025/12/distopxica-hace-un-llamado-de-resistencia-cultural-con-arde/ - BreathingTheCore (US): https://www.breathingthecore.com/2025/12/interviews-distopxica.html - Volcano FM / Museo del Rock (Ecuador): https://www.volcanofm.com/distopxica-enciende-la-conciencia-con-arde-rock-de-protesta-inteligente/ - RockAndWrestling (Chile): https://rockandwrestling.com/estreno-la-banda-colombiana-distopxica-presenta-arde/

If restored, I will immediately: 1) add these as references to statements (instance of musical group, place of origin, genres, etc.) 2) add reliable identifiers (e.g., MusicBrainz/streaming identifiers where applicable) and keep descriptions neutral.

Thanks. JavierVacaCO (talk) 21:13, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi, just a gentle ping in case an admin is available to review this undeletion request. Thanks. JavierVacaCO (talk) 15:06, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

@Vincent_Andrews @Madamebiblio

Friendly ping in case an administrator is available to review this undeletion request.

Independent coverage from multiple reliable media outlets is provided above.

Thank you for your time. JavierVacaCO (talk) 14:59, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Proposal to configure the Newcomer Dashboard for Wikidata

Hello Admins,

Following community interest in having the Newcomer Dashboard available on Wikidata, the development team has prepared a draft configuration. The primary goal of the dashboard is to provide structured guidance, helpful links, and mentorship opportunities for newcomers.

We have prepared this draft configuration to support the community and provide a concrete starting point for discussion. The decision to implement it rests entirely with the community, whether as proposed, with adjustments, or not at all. If a consensus is reached, any administrator with the necessary technical rights can enable the final configuration directly on Wikidata proper.

The draft configuration is available for review on Beta (and the summary is copy-pasted below for convenience).

Proposed Configuration on Beta

Help Panel Namespaces with the help panel disabled in both reading and editing mode: none Namespaces where the help panel is available in reading mode: Main (Item), Properties, Lexemes, EntitySchemas Namespaces to include in the help panel's free text search for help: Wikidata, Help Where should questions from the help panel be directed? Help desk Help desk page where questions should be posted from the help panel: TBD (Would the community rather have help requests added to the Project chat or a dedicated page?) Where on the help desk page should new questions be posted? Bottom of the page Help panel links: Wikidata:Introduction, Wikidata:Tours, Help:FAQ Destination page for "View more help articles: Help:Contents Newcomer Onboarding Newcomer homepage links: *empty* Destination help for a link about creating a new article: Help:Items Destination page for a link about how to add images in the visual editor: *empty* Community Updates Title: Weekly Summary Image: Wikidata logo Image Url: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikidata-logo-en.svg Body text: "Here's your quick overview of what’s happened around Wikidata in the past week." Destination page: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Status_updates/Current Label: Learn more about the updates on Wikidata in the past week. Mentorship Program Minimum number of days a user must be registered to sign up as a mentor: 365 Minimum number of edits a user must have made (on any namespace) to sign up as a mentor: 500 Number of days that are considered when evaluating mentee's praiseworthiness: 30 By default, how often should mentors receive notifications to remind them to send encouragement to mentees who are editing successfully (in hours)? *empty* Maximum number of edits an user can have to be considered praiseworthy: 300 Default minimum number of edits a mentee must have to be praiseworthy: 10 Opt out experienced users from mentorship: *uncheck* Number of edits: *not applicable* Account age (in days): *not applicable*

Please share your thoughts, suggestions, and concerns below on this section.

Thank you. -Mohammed Abdulai (WMDE) (talk) 15:44, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, naively, this looks good to me, I do not see any immediate issues. I must add though I do not understand the second part (Newcomer Onboarding). Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Ymblanter, thank you for the feedback. You're right, it's not very clear. The Newcomer Onboarding section contains generic text which was designed for Wikipedia and doesn't quite fit Wikidata. Our recommendation is to leave the fields there empty in the initial configuration. This will simply hide the section for now. The rest of the dashboard can proceed and go live. We will work with the WMF to adapt the text specifically for Wikidata and once updated, we can revisit this section with the community. We're happy to proceed with this way if there are no objections. -Mohammed Abdulai (WMDE) (talk) 16:16, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Gymnicus

Gymnicus 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Disruptive editing. The last complain is just 2 weeks ago. Now that the discussion has been moved to the archive, Gymnicus abuses the reverse button again:

• Source deliberately incorrectly cited, retrieval date deleted (the parenthetical addition "Kultur" is part of the definition)
• Despite explanation, he deleted the information again (the retrieval date is not a unnecessary reference)

Given his long history of disruptive editing and fruitless, lengthy discussions, imho this user should be blocked again. @Arch2all, Balû, Emu, Kawona67, Labant, Mahir256: FYI. --Kolja21 (talk) 16:20, 31 January 2026 (UTC) ―Kolja21 (talk) 16:20, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

An der Beschwerde von vor zwei Wochen hat man bereits gesehen, dass die Administratoren meine damaligen Bearbeitungen nicht als falsch angesehen haben. Das solltest du, Kolja21, dann auch mal akzeptieren. Zu heutigen Meldung möchte ich folgendes sagen:

1. Bei „Jury <Kultur>“ bei der GND handelt es sich meiner Meinung nach, um dasselbe Muster wie bei „Jury (Wettbewerb)“ in der Wikipedia, und meint damit „Jury in der Kultur“. Trotzdem ist wie bei der Wikipedia der eigentlich verwendete Begriff nur „Jury“ und deswegen muss auch nur dieser bei dem Qualifikator alternative name (P4970) genannt werden.
2. Der zweite Teil ist in Prinzip dasselbe wie vor zwei Wochen. Ich hatte die GND hinzugefügt und Kolja hat später ein Abrufdatum als Fundstelle hinzugefügt. Eine solche Fundstelle ist aber nicht valid und zudem auch nicht notwendig, weil ich beim Hinzufügen schon gecheckt habe, dass es übereinstimmt.

Ich hatte jetzt keine wirkliche Lust und Zeit auf Englisch zu antworten. Da Wikidata aber ein mehrsprachiges Projekt ist, ist dies kein Problem. Sollte trotzdem jemand eine Übersetzung wünschen kann ich sie gerne später nachreichen. --Gymnicus (talk) 17:01, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

"However, such a reference is ... unnecessary, because I already checked it when adding it." A retrieval date is essential, as online sources can change. This also applies to the GND. --Kolja21 (talk) 17:05, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

@Gymnicus Woran genau hat man bei der letzten Beschwerde gesehen, dass die Administratoren Bearbeitungen „nicht als falsch angesehen haben“? Abgesehen davon, dass Administratoren bekanntlich nicht über inhaltliche Fragen entscheiden, hat @Labant gesagt, was dazu zu sagen ist. --Emu (talk) 14:52, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Der Admin Labant hat in seinen Kommentaren immer wieder von dem Wort „Konsens“ gesprochen. Auf diesem Gebiet gibt es aber keinen Konsens für die Bearbeitungen von Kolja21. Du selbst nutzt diese Art von Abrufdaten auch nicht, wie man zum Beispiel an dem Juristen batch 2 von dir sieht. Auch bei der letzten Diskussion hat der von Kolja21 angepingte User Matthias M. seinen Kommentar mit dem Verweis „ah sorry it is about references of IDs, that is indeed questionable“ wieder gelöscht (siehe [1]). Also muss erstmal Kolja21 nachweisen, dass es einen Konsens für seine Art von Bearbeitungen gibt. --Gymnicus (talk) 15:19, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Für mich sind IDs, die eine Datenbank vergibt, größtenteils unabänderlich. Wenn die ID zurückgezogen wird, kann sie als deprecated markiert werden oder ganz gelöscht werden. In den Bereichen, in denen ich editiere, sind Abrufdaten für externe Identifikatoren unüblich. Es sind keine Zitationen, sondern Verknüpfungen. Da das hier offenbar ein Streitpunkt ist, solltet ihr in dem zuständigen Projekt einen Konsens erzielen und dann eine Datenbankbeschränkung setzen, je nachdem, ob das Abrufdatum bei GNDs zwingend erforderlich, entfernt werden soll oder optional ist. Bis das geklärt ist, solltet ihr beide von kontroversen Änderungen ablassen. Matthias M. (talk) 15:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Weil ich die Bearbeitungen nur bei Datenobjekten, wo ich damals selbst die GND-Kennung hinzugefügt habe, gemacht habe, ist es für mich kein Problem von weiteren Bearbeitungen abzusehen. Aber da ich schon mal schlechte Erfahrungen in einen ähnlichen Fall gemacht habe, mache ich dies nur unter der Bedingung, dass Kolja21 administrativ darauf hingewiesen wird, diese Bearbeitungen bis zur Klärung zur unterlassen. Gymnicus (talk) 15:53, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

@Matthias M.: In dem betreffenden Fall geht es darum, dass Angaben wie subject named as (P1810) oder scope note (P9570) als Information zu einem Normdatensatz hinzugefügt wurden. Diese Angaben können sich ändern, wenn der Datensatz aufgearbeitet oder Dubletten zusammengeführt werden. Aber das sind inhaltliche Fragen. - Der Antrag, den User zu sperren, bezieht sich auf "disruptive editing". Gymnicus nimmt sich das Recht heraus (stets mit dem Argument, dass kein Konsens vorliege), die Reverstaste zu drücken und Edit wars zu starten. Seine Störaktionen gehen Querbeet und betreffen alle Bereiche. Es gab dazu etliche Diskussionen (warum sollte seine Einzelmeinung die einzig richtige sein, wenn doch angeblich kein Konsens vorliegt?), aber er hat sein Verhalten nicht geändert. --Kolja21 (talk) 16:18, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

@Matthias M.: Hier ein Beispiel aus der Normdatenwartung (de:Wikipedia:GND/Fehlermeldung/Mai 2023/Rückmeldung). Die Bayerische Staatsbibliothek hat Einträge auf Namensgleichheit überprüft und die Ansetzungsform von "Gerlandus, Agrigentinus" in Gerland, Agrigent, Bischof, Heiliger geändert. --Kolja21 (talk) 03:18, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

@Gymnicus Labant ist kein Administrator, soweit ich weiß. Wir hatten diese Konversation schon mehrmals. Wir sind wenige, unsere Arbeit ist gefühlt grenzenlos. Bitte machen wir uns das Leben nicht gegenseitig schwer. Das Abrufdatum ist eine harmlose, für das Projekt und fremde Workflows irrelevante Formatierungspräferenz – keine Ahnung, wie man sich daran so sehr stoßen kann, dass man den Drang verspürt, zu revertieren. Was die eckigen Klammern angeht: Hatten wir dazu nicht schon einmal in grauer Vorzeit eine Diskussion? --Emu (talk) 19:10, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Das dachte ich eigentlich auch und war aufgrund deiner Aussage bzw. der expliziten Erwähnung von ihm in der Aussage verwirrt. Dann habe ich den Satz aber wohl falsch interpretiert und dann kann ich dir jetzt noch besser auf deine eigentlich in der Aussage gestellte Frage antworten: Innerhalb von etwas mehr als sieben Tagen hat es kein Administrator für nötig gehalten sich zu der Meldung zu äußern. Daraus habe ich geschlussfolgert, dass keine meldungswürdigende Sache vorlag. Oder wie würdest du den Sachverhalt interpretieren? --Gymnicus (talk) 19:40, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Es ist ein Freiwilligenprojekt und Admins haben weder individuell noch kollektiv die Pflicht, innerhalb bestimmter Fristen oder überhaupt tätig zu werden. Aber selbst wenn man dem Schweigen einen Erklärungswert zuweisen möchte (was man in der Regel eben nicht kann), könnte man es auch als administrative Zustimmung zur Aussage von Labant interpretieren. Das sind alles sehr interessante Gedanken, die ich auch gerne anstelle, es hat schon einen Grund, warum ich u. a. Rechtswissenschaften studiert habe, aber es bringt uns wirklich nicht weiter. --Emu (talk) 20:01, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Ich hatte dies schon mal bei einer anderen Diskussion hier auf den Bord geschrieben: Ich fordere von keinem Administrator, dass er sofort antwortet oder immer bereit ist. Aber dass alle Administratoren scheinbar eine Diskussion scheuen, ist dann auch nicht richtig. Denn dadurch wissen dann die beteiligten Personen auch nicht, woran sie sind. Und wenn dann doch die Zeitgründe, das große Problem sind. Dann sollte man vielleicht überlegen, ob man die eigens gesteckten „Fristen“, was hier die Archivierung nach sieben Tagen ohne Beitrag ist, überdenken müsste. --Gymnicus (talk) 20:12, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Für mich sind das Abrufdatum keine harmlose Sache. Es ist ein unnötiger Verbrauch von Speicherkapazität, und zwar deutlich größer als die geringe Speicherkapazität von Labeln, welche jetzt aufgrund von mul gelöscht werden sollen. Dass das Abrufdatum unnötig ist, hat oben auch Matthias M. bestätigt. Also kann man auch nicht von Privatmeinung meinerseits sprechen, wie Kolja21 gerne sagt. Dagegen ist das Hinzufügen vom Abrufdatum durch Kolja21 eine Privatmeinung. --Gymnicus (talk) 19:57, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

We are back where we always end up. The problem is not that he misquotes sources or deletes the retrieval date. Gymnicus insists that he can dictate to others how they should edit and continue to use the revert button for this purpose. He enforces his ideas with edit wars. Since he is not changing his behavior, his account should be blocked again. --Kolja21 (talk) 02:18, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Changes

Please change sitelink eswiki "Joaquín Velázquez Cárdenas de León" from Joaquín Velázquez de León, because they are different, they are father and son! Setyobac (talk) 06:28, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done I moved the sitelink to a new item, which I merged to Joaquín Velázquez Cárdenas y Léon (Q55881587); I don't know which of the label "Cárdenas y Léon" and the article title "Cárdenas de Léon" is correct, or if both are. I think there's a mistake in es:Joaquín Velázquez Cárdenas de León where it says they are father and son, as Joaquín Velázquez de León (Q3179778) was born several years after Joaquín Velázquez Cárdenas y Léon (Q55881587) died. According to es:Joaquín Velázquez de León he's the son of the cousin of Joaquín Velázquez Cárdenas de León. Peter James (talk) 16:47, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 16:09, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Suppression Agence WAM

Hello, I created the "Agence WAM" entity on Wikidata because other similar companies exist.

Unfortunately this one was deleted by Jamie7687 explaining to me that I didn't have enough reference. However, I had also submitted several relevant press articles. I don't understand why this one was deleted while others (like this one: Q137534731) are still online.

I can complete the references with press articles here from recognized and serious media. (Q3500156 or Q25161472 or Q923193 or Q16534812).

Here are new reference URLs to complete :

https://www.lesechos.fr/pme-regions/grand-est/agences-web-le-mulhousien-premiere-place-rejoint-le-groupe-wam-1914085

https://www.forbes.fr/technologie/google-et-les-cookies-tiers-le-tete-a-queue-final/

https://www.cbnews.fr/conseil/agence-wam-est-reconduite-plusieurs-clients

https://www.strategies.fr/actualites/agences/LQ1621292C/lagence-premiere-place-rejoint-le-groupe-lyonnais-wam.html

Tell me if this can help restore the created entity. Thank you for your help. Faalaaf (talk) 20:34, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

I did not delete any item, as I am not an administrator. I requested the deletion of the item after attempting to assess its notability and noticing that it and the "David Eichholtzer" item appeared to be re-creations of deleted items by Xavierfava (this user disclosed an affiliation with Agence WAM on their user page, which Faalaaf recently blanked for some reason). Jamie7687 (talk) 21:17, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

The blanking of the older account's user page by this account was suspicious as both were making items on Agence WAM, and indeed I found them Confirmed to be the same person. If you see any more accounts creating items on this company, please file a report at WD:RFCU. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:23, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Undeletion Request: Q137994024 (CareerNaksha)

Reason for Request: I am requesting the undeletion of item Q137994024 (CareerNaksha). This item was recently deleted as "spam," but I believe it meets Wikidata's notability criteria under N2 (Independent Reliable Sources) and N3 (Structural Necessity).

Conflict of Interest Disclosure: I am a paid consultant for the subject (CareerNaksha). I have updated my Wikidata user page to include the mandatory paid editing disclosure template as per project policy. I am committed to maintaining this item with strictly neutral, factual, and well-sourced data.

Evidence of Notability (Independent Sources): The subject has received significant coverage in multiple independent, reputable, third-party news outlets. These sources are not self-published or press releases:

• YourStory: Detailed feature on Tier-3 EdTech accessibility
• The Week: Coverage of the firm's educational impact
• The Print / ANI: Expansion into new counseling centers
• Indian Startup Times: Founder interview regarding democratization of career guidance

Structural Necessity: The item is required to link the organization's official identifiers—including its official website, Facebook ID, Instagram username, and LinkedIn company ID—to the global Knowledge Graph. This is essential for ensuring data consistency across external platforms.

Planned Improvements: If restored, I will immediately:

1. Re-add the independent news references mentioned above to all factual statements.
2. Add identifiers (social media and official IDs) as structured statements.
3. Ensure all descriptions remain strictly neutral and descriptive.

Thank you for your consideration. Cnvadodara (talk) 04:39, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

 Not done @Cnvadodara: LLM-written requests are not considered.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Undeletion Request: Q138006416 (In Virtuo Laboratories SA)

Hi admins,

I request undeletion of Q138006416 (In Virtuo Laboratories SA), which was deleted as spam.

Conflict of interest: I am associated with the subject. I will keep the item strictly factual, non-promotional, and fully sourced, and I accept the community’s decision.

Independent, third-party verification (non-self-published):
Official / registry-style sources
– Moneyhouse (commercial register–based profile) confirming legal existence, UID CHE-137.991.763, legal form (SA), and registered office (Lugano): https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/in-virtuo-laboratories-sa-18702314001
– Startup.ch company listing (independent business directory): https://www.startup.ch/in-virt uo-laboratories
– Yellowpages.swiss (commercial register–sourced listing) confirming UID CHE-137.991.763 and commercial register number CH-501.4.029.273-8: https://yellowpages.swiss/location.cfm?art=HRB&company=In-Virtuo-Laboratories-SA&key=2705216
– Swissreg (Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property / IPI) trade mark application record “INVIRTUOLABS” linked to the company name and address (official database entry): https://www.swissreg.ch/database-client/register/detail?lang=en&no=18070%2F2025&type=trademark

Independent coverage / ecosystem listings
– Startupticker.ch (Swiss startup news) mentioning InVirtuoLabs (Lugano) and the funding round: https://www.startupticker.ch/en/news/2-85-million-to-accelerate-ai-in-drug-discovery
– Boldbrain (official competition site) noting “In Virtuo Labs” as the winner (2024 edition): https://www.boldbrain.ch/en/2024/12/05/here-are-the-2024-finalists-2/

These sources support that the entity exists as a legally registered Swiss company with an official UID and registered headquarters, and that it has been referenced by independent third parties.

If restored, I will immediately:
• base the item only on independent registry-type sources for core statements (e.g., instance of, Swiss UID, legal form, headquarters location, country, inception if listed),
• avoid any descriptive or promotional claims, and
• add only standard identifiers and neutral factual statements.

Thank you for your time and consideration. NicolaiOlesen (talk) 11:04, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Entity mismatch between Live Nation Entertainment (Q1061903) and Live Nation (events promoter) (Q16960819) in Spanish Wikipedia

There is an entity mismatch in Spanish sitelinks: Live Nation Entertainment (Q1061903) (parent company) has no Spanish Wikipedia article. Live Nation (events promoter) (Q16960819) has a Spanish article that describes the parent company instead of the subsidiary (but mixing some information like website). Suggested fix: create/link a Spanish article for Live Nation Entertainment to Q1061903, and adjust the existing Spanish article to describe only the subsidiary linked to Q16960819. Mnovellino (talk) 14:11, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Restoration Request: Cenab Ulvi (Significant Media Evidence)

Hello, ​I am requesting the restoration of the deleted item for Cenab Ulvi. The item was previously deleted due to notability concerns, but I have gathered extensive evidence from multiple reliable and independent media outlets that satisfy the Wikidata notability guidelines. ​Below is the list of secondary sources and interviews: ​Interview on Lent.az ​Feature on Manset.az ​Interview on Kulis.az ​Coverage on Icma.az ​News on Habereguven.com ​Report on Bakues.az ​Profile on Denizli24haber.com ​News on Denizliyeniolay.com ​Article on Beyazgundem.com ​Feature on Xeberekspress.az ​Profile on Editor.az ​Coverage on Busaat.az ​Interview on Murekkephaber.com ​I will add these as formal references to the item immediately after it is restored. Could an administrator please assist with this restoration? ​Thank you for your time and help. Heseneliyev12 (talk) 16:05, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

undeletion request

Q137435489 Q134716354 Trolled (talk) 01:30, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Not done --Saroj (talk) 07:22, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

bom dia, queria saber o motivo e qual era as paginas em questão para saber o por que foi deletado – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Trollface 2006ALT​ (talk • contribs).

@Saroj: Please do not close undeletion requests without comment (since this will bite newcomers). Better left it for another admin.--GZWDer (talk) 17:35, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Internationals.pro

Internationals.pro 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam ―Amomum (talk) 02:03, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 07:02, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Saroj (talk) 07:02, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Edit conflict on Requests for Deletions

https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions&diff=prev&oldid=2461124462

This edit appears to have partially reverted request for Deletions. I'm on mobile and don't have the ability to restore the lost requests. Can someone review it? William Graham (talk) 03:00, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Fixed --Saroj (talk) 07:20, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Saroj (talk) 07:20, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Jalin putra

Jalin putra 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: vandalism on Q97203557, user adding personal phone number. CC oversight. Yamato Shiya^{大和 士也} (Talk • Contribs) 04:20, 6 February 2026 (UTC) ―Yamato Shiya^{大和 士也} (Talk • Contribs) 04:20, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Blocked. Aqurs1 (talk) 06:27, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 16:02, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:~2026-80595-4

~2026-80595-4 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: vandalism on multiple items ―Yamato Shiya^{大和 士也} (Talk • Contribs) 04:59, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 07:24, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Saroj (talk) 07:24, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:~2026-82439-5

~2026-82439-5 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Long-term abuse ―Tbhotch (talk) 05:11, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 07:26, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Saroj (talk) 07:26, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Protection request

Please protect

Q61971037 Q135398036

these pages are being targeted by an LTA ~2026-81688-2 (talk) 06:32, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done --Saroj (talk) 07:29, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Saroj (talk) 07:29, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Babynamescube

Babynamescube 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:08, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 15:36, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Saroj (talk) 15:36, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Modernvancouver

Modernvancouver 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:08, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done Ternera (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:SwostiTravel

SwostiTravel 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:09, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done Ternera (talk) 16:00, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:EliteLux

EliteLux 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done Ternera (talk) 16:00, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 16:00, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Toppercalculator

Toppercalculator 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:11, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done Ternera (talk) 15:59, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 15:59, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:CEMXNet

CEMXNet 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: out of scope, promotion XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:11, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 15:58, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Saroj (talk) 15:58, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Refinisriot

Refinisriot 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Long-term abuse. Special:CentralAuth/HamedMirani8, Special:CentralAuth/Hamed_Mirani, Special:CentralAuth/Hamed_Miranii XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:21, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Account is already globally locked. --Saroj (talk) 15:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Saroj (talk) 15:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Protection request for Q113704154

Please semi-protect Q113704154. Reason: Persistent vandalism XReport --Morneo06 (talk) 13:46, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:09, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 15:59, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:~2026-83967-5

~2026-83967-5 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 19:07, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done by EPIC. Ternera (talk) 19:13, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 19:13, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:23IVAN

23IVAN 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam ―Amomum (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Request to undelete Q136786583 (Alfonso Ojeda)

I request the undeletion of item Q136786583 (Alfonso Ojeda), which was deleted in November 2025 due to lack of notability.

Since the deletion, new and significant evidence of notability is available:

• ORCID identifier: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2037-6308
• Scholarly work with DOI registered in Zenodo (CERN): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18499187
• Google Scholar profile indexing the publication: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=7Iz4Zc0AAAAJ
• The work is indexed in OpenAIRE, a European research infrastructure
• Academic profile: https://independent.academia.edu/AlfonsoOjedaconsultormarca
• Official website: https://alfonsoojeda.com

These sources demonstrate verifiable academic authorship and presence in recognized scholarly infrastructures, which were not available at the time of deletion.

I believe this new evidence satisfies Wikidata's notability policy and justifies restoring the item. --Alfonso Ojeda (talk) 19:11, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Protection Request for Q11522313

Due to the recurrence of past vandalism case, I request protection for Mio Sugita (Q11522313) again.

• Past case 1:Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive/2025/10#h-Protection_Request-20251006020900
• Past case 2:Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive/2025/10#c-Mariobanana-20251028112600-Protection_Request_for_Q11522313

Mariobanana (talk) 00:44, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Protection request

Please protect

Q685430 Q2574121 Q5096241 Q1242256

those pages are being targeted by an LTA ~2026-84044-7 (talk) 05:37, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Undeletion/Disambiguation Request: Surplex UK Limited (QID:

I am requesting the restoration/separation of the item for Surplex UK Limited. It has been incorrectly merged with or deleted in favor of "Surplex GmbH/Auctions." Why these are distinct entities: Surplex UK Limited (Co. No. 05317842): Native UK entity, active since 2004. Specializes in ITAD/Recycling.(Site: surplex.co.uk) Surplex Auctions Ltd (Co. No. 10439157): German-owned auction house founded in 2016. Currently facing Compulsory Strike-Off (GAZ1 Jan 2026). The Data Integrity Issue: > Linking a compliant, 21-year-old UK firm with a non-compliant entity facing government dissolution is a major factual error that corrupts the Knowledge Graph. We request the item be restored with its unique P2622 (Company House ID) to prevent future conflation. ~2026-76949-3 (talk) 05:46, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

--Suwirot khongyuen (talk) 05:59, 7 February 2026 (UTC)== Undelete request: Q137942746 in wikidata ==

I would like to request the undeletion of item Q137942746 (Suwirot khongyuen). This item was deleted due to notability concerns, but I believe it meets the criteria because he's a independent filmmaker and creator behind the handsaw murder franchise, You can find reputable sources and references here: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm17641934/?ref_=ext_shr Thank you. Suwirot khongyuen (talk) 05:57, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:~2026-84687-5

~2026-84687-5 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Hijacking items. I observe several patterns like this previously, temporary account hijacking items related to Arabic television programmes. However, I do not keep the accounts, so I could not request checkuser. ―Yamato Shiya^{大和 士也} (Talk • Contribs) 07:28, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

 Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 07:57, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Saroj (talk) 07:57, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Sonortiod

Sonortiod 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Long-term abuse. Special:Contributions/Refinisriot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 09:23, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

This is a Likely match. @MathXplore: Please report this and future accounts to WD:RFCU. Jasper Deng (talk) 09:45, 7 February 2026 (UTC)