User talk:BeneBot*/Archive

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Missing links

Hi, many links are missing in Q117758 (compared to de, en wikis)--Zolo (talk) 14:13, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

It's because the API-request gives me wrong data. I do not understand it because there are much more langlinks in the german article --Bene* (talk) 14:18, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

fixed I have no fixed the bug --Bene* (talk) 16:48, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Great thanks.--Zolo (talk) 17:32, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Labels mit /

Labels mit wie in Q144707 oder Q145174 sind nicht gerade für Wikidata geeignet. Das sollten wir imo besser den Menschen überlassen. Fälle wie Q138405 und Q140139 können auch verwirren. Merlissimo (talk) 09:45, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

User:BeneBot*/conflicts/ru

Do you have plans to recheck this iwiki-conflicts? --ShinePhantom (talk) 04:03, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Delete "Done" in User:BeneBot*/conflicts/it

Maybe the bot have some problem to delete the Done conflicts, can you check? --ValterVB (talk) 19:12, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I see it. I will have a look at the source code. Thanks for reporting. --Bene* (talk) 19:48, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Q1110333

The label for this item fot italian - it - is "Jangel& #039;" (without space). See diff. Can you check HTML code of your bots? Thanks --Beta16 (talk) 19:00, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Also like Q1110944, Q1110719, Q1110256 and others. --Beta16 (talk) 19:04, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

I will try to fix it. Are the html codes only at italian articles? --Bene* (talk) 20:42, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

I don't know if only italian articles. I simply check the last contributions of BeneBot*. --Beta16 (talk) 23:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

About DotNetDataBot

Can you post an example for add a description to a Item starting from a page on wikipedia? Thanks --ValterVB (talk) 09:47, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

I don't understand what you exactly mean. At the moment my bot does not create descriptions at all. DotNetDataBot is only a framework for editing Wikidata, no complete program. If you want to know how my bot imports links and labels, I can post some code. --Bene* (talk) 22:01, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, but now I solved, I needed an example like here for add description to an item, but now I found it. Thanks for DotNetDataBot --ValterVB (talk) 22:14, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I understand. You're welcome ;-) --Bene* (talk) 08:21, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Q303430

Your bot added Q303430 with the English label "Fiat 6614#Type 6616" on December 2. Has this bug since been fixed? --Yair rand (talk) 14:06, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

I have updated the bot and thus it should be fixed now. --Bene* (talk) 22:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Another bug: Q1810673 was given the label "The Yellow "M"". --Yair rand (talk) 00:18, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Html codes should be decoded now. --Bene* (talk) 08:22, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Did your bot fix all the items affected by the bugs? Or will it? --Yair rand (talk) 19:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanx!

hi Bene, ein schnelles, aber herzliches Danke für die gute Arbeit, die dein Bot leistet. habe gerade wieder bei ein paar französischen Gemeinden die fehlende bezeichnung ergänzt, was ohne die mitwirkung des bots noch monate gedauert hätte. --Kolja21 (talk) 02:06, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Exclusion criteria

Hi, is it possible that this bot excludes all pages which are on page Wikidata:Notability/Exclusion criteria? --Stryn (talk) 07:38, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Bearbeitungskommentar

Hallo Bene. Hat's deinem Bot die Sprache verschlagen oder warum macht er keinen Bearbeitungskommentar mehr? --Leyo 15:52, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Der Bot schickt eingentlich immer eine summary mit, aber offensichtlich werden benutzerdefinierte Kommentare beim Bearbeiten von Properties nicht unterstützt. -.- Oder ich hab was falsch gemacht... :P --Bene* ^t_a^l_k 20:16, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

OK, danke für deine Antwort. --Leyo 09:16, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

& amp;

Hi Bene*,

Just to let you know:

At Q523201, I fixed the bot generated "& a m p ; " by converting it to "&". -- Docu at 07:17, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Please fix

Example http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2707405 , many labels are strange e.g. &# 039;t Rooth instead of 't Rooth, Could you update these labels? RobotMichiel1972 (talk) 21:37, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Approved for this task?

Hi, is BeneBot* approved for the task as marking sections as done? -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 18:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Bot speed

Could you pleas look at Wikidata talk:Bots#Bot speed and maybe change your bot so it only makes one edit per second (60 edits/minute). --Sk!d (talk) 14:54, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

video games - operating system

Hi Bene,
could you please pause adding this item to video games? I would like to start a discussion of the use of this property and of the property "platform". I think that we should define first how they should be used. Thank you. --#Reaper (talk) 21:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Hmm, I think there is a consensus at Wikidata:Video games task force and at en:Category:Windows games it says "operating system", too. Regards, -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 21:17, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, hmm.. I've started the discussion on the task force talk page. And one "bug" of your bot: Q813266 It shouldn't add again a property which has been deleted. ;) (Problem here: A series has no OS or similar. ;) ) Best regards, --#Reaper (talk) 22:39, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

What happened here?

The bot went haywire and added 6 claims for the genre property. :3 --Izno (talk) 17:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

I have blocked the bot until the above can be fixed. It is making hundreds of edits of this sort. --Izno (talk) 17:47, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for blocking, I do not really understand this bug. Would you like to unblock the bot because I've stopped the script. Now I will fix the disturbed items by the bot. Thanks again, -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 18:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

I'll do that. Thanks for offering to clean up. --Izno (talk) 18:14, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

I see you've started the script again. Did you get the bug fixed? --Izno (talk) 20:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, while running through the items it is checking for duplicates now and removes them. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 20:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

I hope only exact duplicates because qualifiers make claims unique which would otherwise be duplicate. --Izno (talk) 21:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Of course only exact duplicates ;-) -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 21:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

According to this: Maybe its not the best way to simply use the categories as source: strange edits ;) --#Reaper (talk) 20:09, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

I will try to fix it, but there shouldn't be much edits of this sort. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 20:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Side request: Would it be possible to get the bot not to edit war with me :)? I realize that might be outside the scope of the current script, so it's really more of a future feature request I guess. --Izno (talk) 21:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Well, I can try to teach the bot that it should look if it was reverted before but I am not sure if it will work properly... -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 21:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

It would be easier if you only save if your bot has already worked on this item (and property). It would be nice if this could be "fixed" in the next days, before I forget which items has to be changed, because I have also started an edit war with your bot. ;) --#Reaper (talk) 21:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Would you like it if you could use a specific key word in the summary and when added this the bot won't edit this item any more? Just a thought... -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 22:04, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Hmm, maybe the bot could keep a log of items which it edits and properties which it adds to, and then check that? More thoughts. :) --Izno (talk) 01:03, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

I think saving the items would be better, a key word has to be known by everybody, that wouldn't work very well. Note: You should also save the value which has been set, because there will be sometimes more than one per property and could change in future. (I'd also save the timestamp.) And one which could maybe useful, too: Write a log file where conflicts have been, so it could (but don't have to ;) ) be used by others. (Just a suggestion if the speed of the algorithm will be to slow: split the file up into 9 files using the first digit of the item. ;) ) Greets, --#Reaper (talk) 17:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Or you could force the script to run over each item only once per whatever category/infobox field you're running through. I suppose that's what the idea of a log gets to, but without the log. You would still need to keep track of what elements you had done, but not necessarily via a log. --Izno (talk) 18:54, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

It is stopping after one run now. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 14:46, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

A new bot list

Hi there! Per a request I have been working on a new informative bot list (that has secretly been hidden under the current list at Wikidata:List_of_bots. I think I am finished and it would be great if every botop (including you) could add your bot to the new list. I have added Addbot already and tried to make the template simple! Goodluck and if you have any problems get in touch on my talk page! ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 20:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Deletion marking

I don't really speak bot, so forgive me if this isn't possible, but when marking requests as "done" on RFD, is there any chance the bot could include in the edit summary how many, or even if there are any unactioned deletion requests? Thanks. Courcelles (talk) 20:17, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Benebot skip

Hey, I regularly delete items on WD:RfD but Benebot never seems to mark any of my deletions as "done". It does for some admins but not others. How do I get it to also mark the ones I have deleted? It would save me a lot of time. Thanks! Del_♉sion23 (talk) 12:21, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi, put your user name here: User:BeneBot*/RfD-optin. --Stryn (talk) 12:57, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Ahhh, I hadn't realised it was opt-in. Cheers! Del_♉sion23 (talk) 15:52, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Suggestion

Could you please add support for closing RfDs as "deleted the other element"? --Ricordi samoa 07:48, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Anyway, my bot has now support for this (example). --Ricordi samoa 12:05, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Roland Garros 2013

You created an entry for the Dutch article for Roland Garros 2013, but it already existed (or at least now it exists) with another Q-number for :de :en :fr and a few more. I have no idea how to fix this, but to me it seems strange to create a WikiData-entry when there is only one language available (but maybe I'm wrong, no idea). Hopefully this is a one time issue? Edoderoo (talk) 11:00, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Inactive?

Hope you don't feel forsaken for this --Ricordi samoa 10:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Please...

...avoid edit conflicts. --Ricordi samoa 10:45, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Is your bot flagged for this task? I only know that my bot is flagged for this task... -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 10:49, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes, it does. It's a fundamental task, we couldn't wait for you :P --Ricordi samoa 14:33, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

wrong, again. --Ricordi samoa 14:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

@Ricordisamoa: I'd rather say your bot was only approved for this task until BeneBot* is back, as its absence was the only reason for your bot approval. Vogone talk 15:17, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

@Vogone: I don't think so. My (and Legoktm's) code has several advantages:

it detects edit conflicts, and does not forces page saving (as BeneBot* does)
when only one request has to be marked, it shows the section header in the edit summary (example)
most importantly: it is capable of detecting when the other item was deleted, instead of the nominated one (example).

--Ricordi samoa 15:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Anyway, I don't want to spend time on bot-edit-warring. --Ricordi samoa 15:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Even if your bot has some advantages, you have still no right to override BeneBot*'s approval. I recommend you to stop your bot or to open a new discussion in which you are explicitly asking for a deapproval of BeneBot*. This is not a way in which bot operators should behave, I'm sorry. Vogone talk 16:49, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

I don't want to request BeneBot*'s deapproval, but it's making more and more mistakes... --Ricordi samoa 16:51, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

I think it was made apparent by Benebot*'s Wikibreak that it is important to have back-up in place in case a bot operator takes time off for things in real life. I hope this can be sorted out cordially. Both Bene* and Ricordisamoa are talented bot operators. Perhaps both bots could use this new advanced code developed by Ricordi and Lego, so that less mistakes are made. And Benebot* can get back to marking deleted items, and if a break is ever needed, Bene* can make it known, so that another bot can come in and take up the task? Del_♉sion23 (talk) 19:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

I would support that, but don't know if Bene* could easily set up his bot with Python. --Ricordi samoa 20:38, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Automobile manufacturers

Hi, your bot created a fair number of term (Q1969448) items that are brand (Q431289) with industry (P452)=automotive industry (Q190117). All of these end up reported as constraint violations in Wikidata:Database reports/Constraint violations/P452 since "industry" should apply only to "organizations" - most such brands are actually car manuturing companies, and all companies are to receive type=organization. Moreover, many of these brands were actually persons, like Engelbert Zaschka (Q62498) or Fritz Fend (Q101162). I started correcting these manually, but it would take me forever since there seems to be many hundreds; I was wondering if your bot could be used for:

wherever it added a second GND type "term" to an existing item, remove "term"
make all other items that were created in this batch : GND type="organization" instead of "term"
you can also set instance of (P31)=automobile manufacturer (Q786820) for these last ones

I believe it would be beneficial, in the future, to prevent the bot from assigning a second GND type when the item already has a value for that property.

Thanks - LaddΩ chat ;) 03:03, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your tip. I will fix the mistakes of my bot as soon as possible. Regards, -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 18:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Impressive cleanup!! Thanks a lot for the quick fixes. The report was not yet updated, but I did many spot-checks and most seem fine now. I did noticed that some items remained unchanged, not sure why, such as Chiltern (Q1073034) and City & Suburban (Q1093823). You might wish to have a second look. Thanks again - LaddΩ chat ;) 22:27, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

WD:RFD#Q9041796

why it marked as done by me? I don't deleted that item but benebot mark as deleted. see that cont and logs [1] see only before July 15th 02:45 --DangSunM (talk) 02:51, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

I just found some more. [2] The Anonymouse (talk) 05:21, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

The problem is that requests are being moved to the archives (like Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2013/07/15) without actually being fulfilled. I'll take them back out and opt-out myself for now to prevent any further problems.

The Anonymouse (talk) 08:36, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

I left a note at the Administrators' noticeboard (Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard#User:BeneBot* is accidentally marking RfD requests). The Anonymouse (talk) 09:05, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Take a look at my comment on Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard#User:BeneBot.2A_is_accidentally_marking_RfD_requests for the probable cause. ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 11:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Also note that the bot has been blocked by 분당선M (talk • contribs • logs). The Anonymouse (talk) 15:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

I've answered on WD:AN. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 16:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Logged out

! --Glaisher [talk] 08:27, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

See User talk:Hazard-SJ#bot for a (oddly coincidental) related issue. The Anonymouse (talk) 05:04, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

It's still editing logged out as anonymous user. Maybe is that password change thing responsible for the bot editting logged out. --Wiki13 _talk 16:48, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Even now! --Vituzzu (talk) 13:10, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

I managed this error. It was because of the password reset in the last days. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 21:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Merge Q1439080 and Q2703926

According to the history, BeneBot* created an entry for de:Röntgenspeicherfolie. As I don't know how to merge entries I am not able to add this page to Q2703926. I think en:Computed radiography is the best matching entry corresponding to the German one.

--77.4.226.119 14:59, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Bot schläft

Bitte aufwecken. Vogone talk 15:40, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Keine Ahnung, was los war. Er ist von selbst wieder aufgewacht... ;-) -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 20:05, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Umayyad Caliphate

Your connection for inter-languages are WRONG! You have separated the topic into 2 different language groups. There are 72 languages, but not all of them connected. You have made 2 separete groups in such a way that if you are in english page, you cannot reach to all of the other languages that is German and French, and if you are German and French, then you cannot reach to English page, because you have not connected all 72 languages together. I have corrected TWICE, but you have reverted!!68.100.160.250 04:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

All pages of Ummayads in different languages should get linked!!

Except TWO of them: ONE is the Ummayad Family Tree in English, and the OTHER is Ummayad Family tree in Turkish, those TWO of them must remain connected with each other68.100.160.250 05:24, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q45646 & http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q8575586#sitelinks-wikipedia

These pages should get MERGED!!! Because they are the SAME. I have had them CORRECTED twice but User talk:Maqivi reverted my CORRECTIONS!!!

Bulk requests

Can bot archive bulk requests per task 6 approval? Thanks, --by Revi레비 at 11:45, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

@Bene*: above and false positive archiving here: This archived without real deletion. Probably recognized comment "Deleted". I think bot should only recognize {{Deleted}}, with {{}} marks.--by Revi레비 at 04:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

I added some code and think this is fixed now. Also the false positive archiving. It now only recognizes the templates {{Deleted}}, {{Done}} and {{Not done}}. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 13:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Task 5

With this archive of bot request, I think bot should add User talk:BeneBot*/movelinks.js/move when archiving. --by Revi레비 at 09:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

I think this is fixed now. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 10:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

q4057633->q56061 (merged)

I ask you to undo all such changes. It was done by error. Please see the discussion. --Infovarius (talk) 18:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I fear this is hardly doable by bot because many of the changed items have already been edited by humans or bots since then. However only 32 items were changed and you can find a list of this items here. Best regards, -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 20:34, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Q1293553 & Q3042849

Q1293553 & Q3042849 should be merged. It is same topic.

RFD

is bot stop working? --Rippitippi (talk) 17:14, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Yup, was a config error. Thanks, -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 19:49, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Unfortunately, that page could not be found

1, 2… You can check? NBS (talk) 10:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

The bot will change them to archived sites in a second run. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 14:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Q2481988

Why did this bot add a date of death to Q2481988 Joseph Delaney ? According to his article [3] he is still alive.Racklever (talk) 06:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

The link on enwiki was wrong. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 06:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Double-check death dates

Hi. Would it be possible to double-check the death dates that you extract from en:Lists of deaths by year in the articles themselves? E.g. you added a death date to Joseph Delaney (Q2481988). The link in that list however is going to the wrong person, and the one desribed in en:Joseph Delaney is still living and the date that you gave is not to be found in the article anywhere (the year is once, in a publication). So it would be better and, so I guess, not that much more complicated, to look in the list, extract the death date, look in the article, check if that death date is present (possibly in at least one of these places: introduction, infobox, person data) and only add the date then. Thanks for considering. --YMS (talk) 13:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

This is possible but also not that trivial to implement. Thus I will think about it but I'm not sure if I have enough time to do it. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 06:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Why? --ValterVB (talk) 22:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

The bot tries to correct itself. I admit this could have been avoided by a smarter guess what's wrong. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 06:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Movelinks

Just a note that there has been a request at movelinks for a while now that hasn't been actioned. It is to move links from Q15137407 to Q13539802. Cheers, and thanks for the bot work, really helps with moving links around. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 23:01, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Hmm, that's really strange because the bot ignores the request for a while now. [4] Will take a look into that. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 23:10, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Ok, should be fixed now. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 23:40, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Great, thanks :) Del_♉sion23 (talk) 19:36, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

RFD

bot stop working? --Rippitippi (talk) 10:16, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Fixed. Needed to complete the eqiad migration. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 22:20, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Families in Harry Potter and Bellatrix (specific person) were merged

Please undo merge and all property changes like this. See also Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2014/05/22#Q12311043. --Infovarius (talk) 20:21, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

done, thanks. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 14:26, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Logged-out edit?

This is presumably BeneBot* being logged out from Labs, right? Is there a bigger problem or does it just happen occasionally? (Mostly just curious. :-))

James F. (talk) 03:26, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Hmmm, I thought I fixed this error but obviously it still happens. I'll investigate into this further. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 14:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

A simple trick is to make sure your api calls include the assert=bot parameter; this will actually fail any attempt to edit while not currently logged into a bot account. MPelletier (WMF) (talk) 20:55, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Q7473516

Merged with Q1490. What here area team (talk) 12:48, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Isn't this item still in use? m -- BeneBot* (talk) 12:57, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, the merge was a big mistake or vandalism. I think we really have to think of a protection. Can you please completely revert the merger. Its all so awful, always to do it manually--Oursana (talk) 14:30, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Bugs identified by BeneBot as redirects

There are few items I created today, but couldn't edit afterwards. After I listed them for deletion, BeneBot marked them as "redirect created" and they never got handled. Sample at Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2014/09/21#Q18093834. --- Jura 16:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

@Bene*:: It happens again. [5] --- Jura 14:27, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Archiving problem

Since BeneBot* taken over archiving, it has not been archiving requests that it did not mark as deleted itself. Hazard's bot previously done that, but now your bot is archiving. Have a quick look at WD:RFD, there's still a few from yesterday that have not yet been archived (I've linked a diff, as I manually archived them) George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 07:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

@George.Edward.C: Perhaps a bit late but I've fixed that issue now. :-) -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 16:39, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Logged out edits

FYI I spotted a few logged out edits :/ Special:Contributions/10.68.17.61 ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 00:20, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Bot no longer running

Benebot* is no longer marking pages as deleted. Could you check what's wrong and fix the bot? Mbch331 (talk) 12:27, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Looking into it. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 20:56, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Seems to be running again. :-) -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 21:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC)