Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2020/01/28

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q15266879

Category:Knights of the Order of Saint John (Bailiwick of Brandenburg) (Q15266879): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Items should be merged with Q8575165 and one of them deleted --Abune (talk) 20:14, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

@Abune:

Done, but when merging items, a redirect should be created, not deleted. Esteban16 (talk) 23:54, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:Esteban16, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:14, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q10203386

Q10203386: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item Zoranzoki21 (talk) 22:03, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by Esteban16 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:14, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q56523389

Munck af Fulkila (Q56523389): Finnish and Swedish noble family: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unused. Created in error. ℇsquilo 20:45, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:1997kB, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q83772504

Q83772504: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

CSS pages are not notable Pppery (talk) 00:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by 1997kB (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q74031211

Antoine Tannous (Q74031211): Senior Technology Analyst - Presenter & Producer of High Tech TV-Radio Shows: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item David (talk) 15:31, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

This isn't my area of knowledge. But I would like someone to see ~~this article~~ (and others) to see what they think and if there is any usable data about the person to fill into their item. Quakewoody (talk)

The article is about Patrick Baz. Baz can be considered notable. --E4024 (talk) 16:35, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Try this again - this article. It's one of those web pages where if you scroll to far, the address automatically updates. That's why I linked the wrong one earlier. Quakewoody (talk) 18:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Keep: seems to held a doctorate. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 18:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC).

Not done. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 07:04, 28 January 2020 (UTC).

Q81064376

Vandrezanne (Q81064376): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Nothing important, no page links to this data record or is linked from this data record. HarryNº2 (talk) 11:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:20, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Sorry I wrongly linked Vandrezanne (Q81064445) (family name) instead of Vandrezanne (Q81064376) (person) from Q56860015 (bus stop). It's corrected Léna (talk) 13:21, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

I am ok with deleting all of them. Quakewoody (talk) 13:29, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Wait, you want to delete all the 9601 bus stops in Wikidata ? Léna (talk) 14:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
A link from the bus stop to the surname is useful - and passage Vandrezanne (Q3368018) and rue Vandrezanne (Q3450256) could have something similar as they are probably named after the same person or family - but is this identifiable as a specific person? Is there another way these can be linked? Also is the bus stop named directly after a person or after the street? Peter James (talk) 18:03, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Yes the person is identifiable since they gave/sold the area to the city, so their name can be found in the city (here Paris) archives. I think it makes more sens to link both the street and the bus stop to the person : better than the surname, because the surname is ambiguous ; and better than the street, to differentiate with bus stops named after streets, such as Q56858033 (funny enough, this bus stop is not in the street of its name). Léna (talk) 19:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

In French Wikipedia for passage Vandrezanne (Q3368018) the formulation is "it is named after Vandrezanne (Q81064376), because it is close to rue Vandrezanne (Q3450256)". Léna (talk) 19:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Keep obviously important and notable per WD:N point 3. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 11:10, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Keep per Léna and VIGNERON —Eihel (talk) 21:15, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Keep, given the structural needs. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 18:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC).

Not done. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 07:06, 28 January 2020 (UTC).

Q83493967

Mari Ohara (Q83493967): fictional character from Love Live! Sunshine!!: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No Wikimedia presence Nadzik (talk) 19:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:30, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Keep notable enough for Wikidata (per point 2 and 3 of WD:N). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 19:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Keep, passes WD:N. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 18:29, 26 January 2020 (UTC).
Keep Per the notability policy - having an article/entry in other Wikimedia projects is not the only case in which something can be considered notable. In this case I agree that there is a structural need. --Kostas20142 (talk) 00:47, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Not done. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 07:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC).

Lexeme:L235650

stone monument (L235650): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a lexeme P134toP4913 (talk) 02:16, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

I fixed the lexical category. --- Jura 10:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Not done then.-- H^akan·IST 07:47, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q56515863

Q56515863: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unused. Created in error. ℇsquilo 20:44, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q65115392

Michel Martin (Q65115392): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No source, no structural need --81.64.27.249 08:21, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q25388255

AOMedia Video (Q25388255): series of video coding formats from the Alliance for Open Media: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item refers to something that doesn't exist. Alliance for Open Media has produced only a single video coding format, AV1, so a series of formats can't be said to exist. --Veikk0.ma (talk) 23:40, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted; due to the dewiki sitelink we cannot delete this item. If you think that there is something wrong with the data, you can fix it of course. —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:22, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q12840079

Gyandzhachay (Q12840079): river in Azerbaijan: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Redirect page--Turkmen ^talk 10:42, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

@Turkmen: I could'nt find any redirect. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 04:47, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:20, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q83743862

Q83743862: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lack notablity/ crosswiki abuse/LTA Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:00, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q83742143

Q83742143: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lack notablity/ crosswiki abuse/LTA/ empty item Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q7269632

Quazi Johirul Islam (Q7269632): Bangladeshi poet: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Page deleted from Wikipedia ~ Nahid ^Talk 09:23, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted; due to VIAF+LC identifiers, this item still meets the notability policy of Wikidata —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Wiktionary redirects

Each of these is an item with a single sitelink that leads to a Wiktionary redirect. According to Wikidata:Notability/Exclusion_criteria sitelinks to soft redirects are not valid sitelinks. These items have no statements or incoming links. Therefore, these are not notable. Shinnin (talk) 17:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Done —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:45, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q9257645

facilitation (Q9257645): organisational method of working together in groups, supported by a moderator: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item point to redirect to Facylitacja (organizacja) in plwiki, so on is not nedeed. --Ency (talk) 12:02, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

The link was updated; it was just the label that had the redirected title. I updated the label, but it needs a description so the part in brackets (if it is only for disambiguation) can be removed from the label. Peter James (talk) 12:32, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 9 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:17, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q32641354

Q32641354: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate with id:Kategori:Tumbuhan Joseagush (talk) 08:09, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

@Joseagush: Did you mean "duplicate with Category:Plants (Q1457109)" ? 轻语者 (talk) 00:09, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted due to the idwiki sitelinks on both items —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:16, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q83152688

Q83152688: building in Güstrow, Germany: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable P134toP4913 (talk) 02:34, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

It's a building with heritage status architectural heritage monument in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Q28859204), in the German Wikipedia list at Q1525393; the source is https://www.landkreis-rostock.de/landkreis/kreisverwaltung/bauamt/denkmalpflege/Denkmalliste_LKROS_Internet.pdf (number 1563 in the list). Peter James (talk) 21:18, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted; added the heritage status instead —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q83154581

Schlossgarten (Q83154581): park in Schwerin, Germany: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable P134toP4913 (talk) 02:34, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Appears to be a park, probably notable although the item currently lacks content. Peter James (talk) 21:20, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted; there is content at Commons —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q24215493

Hofheim am Taunus (Q24215493): Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

CEB rubbish Bahnmoeller (talk) 11:19, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

I restored the link, as the page it links to has not been deleted or redirected, and is relevant to the item. Peter James (talk) 17:58, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted per sitelink —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:24, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q33467482

Nijmegen (Q33467482): city in the Netherlands: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty duplicate of Q47887 --181.88.245.194 11:22, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:39, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

It is not empty, nor is it a dublicate. Quakewoody (talk) 11:47, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
It's about the main populated place of the Dutch commune of Nijmegen, this is not a dublicate, at least obviously not of Q47887. --Wolverène (talk) 04:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted due to the cebwiki situation. —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:23, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q83303493

Q83303493: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Test item from Bencemac Nadzik (talk) 15:50, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

@Nadzik: Excuse me? Bencemac (talk) 16:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

I am so sorry! I had to copy the wrong username. I meant Blancasolercodina. Nadzik (talk) 16:21, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:20, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Melosaurinae toward Melosaurinae in frwiki

MELOSAURINAE TOWARD MELOSAURINAE IN FRWIKI: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I accidentally joined the Wiki page in French Mesosauridae (Sauropsida) with the English page Melosaurinae (Amphibia, Temnospondyli) --Prehistoricplanes (talk) 07:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

This is not the right place for this request, but

Done: Unmerged Q6813567 and Q1029353. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 10:39, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q31838067

Mandatory Palestine national football team (Q31838067): Eretz Israel national association football team during the British Mandate of Palestine (1930–1948): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

After merging Antemister (talk) 22:10, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Other item is Q12409740 Quakewoody (talk) 13:42, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
I restored the items to where they were before you edits. I admit that I suffer from translation issues, but a brief scan of the articles show date differentials. I'd like a 2nd opinion, perhaps from a local who knows the culture. Quakewoody (talk) 23:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

They look like they are the same, it's just that the articles are unclear or incorrect - the English article mentions two dates in 1940 so it's possible that one date is when the squad was announced and the other is the date of the match, or that it was postponed. Peter James (talk) 12:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Merged based on enwiki and dewiki articles —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:22, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:MisterSynergy, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:40, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q3851355

White Army (Q3851355): members of groups fighting against the Red Army in 1918-1920: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Same as item Q104309, should be merged. Sorry! Updated it! Mantr33r (talk) 05:35, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:50, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

You gave the same QID twice. And a search gives numerous results. Could you correct yourself? Quakewoody (talk) 10:59, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
@Mantr33r: There are same item. Maybe should check again? 轻语者 (talk) 01:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Updated it, thank you @轻语者, 轻语者: @Quakewoody:

On hold These items both have entries for some local wikis. If this should be merged, then those articles should be merged first. Before that we cannot proceed here. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 13:49, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

According to Czech Wikipedia, it's not the same. White movement (Q104309) is a political movement, White Army (Q3851355) is a member of its military wing. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 06:46, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted; clearly different —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q80606360

Q80606360: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No such separate surname Infovarius (talk) 16:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:50, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q83854778

Frobenius algebra (Q83854778): algebraic structure with "nice" duality properties: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I crated this item by mistake --2A01:CB10:839F:7100:4C26:53FC:C455:56D8 10:11, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:MisterSynergy, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q10752091

Q10752091: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It's the same as Q193726. --Magicknight94 (talk) 01:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

They both have articles on vi.WP, therefore WD can't do anything about it. Quakewoody (talk) 13:07, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
It's only copra (Q193726) when it's dried - not sure if it should say Q193726 is produced from Q10752091, or is a subclass of it, or both. Peter James (talk) 15:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted due to viwiki situation —MisterSynergy (talk) 11:04, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q31440338

Ilya (Q31440338): male given name (Илья): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It's the same item as Q1096462 and is preventing me from creating and interwiki link. --Akeosnhaoe (talk) 06:43, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Q31440338 is for men calling Ilya who are surrounded by Cyrillic script in their countries of nationality, and their native name - Илья - may be romanized differently depending on language. Q1096462 is for men (and women?) from countries with no Cyrillic-script background, with the name by passport that's written exactly as Ilya. No merging needed. --Wolverène (talk) 08:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted per reason given by User:Wolverène —MisterSynergy (talk) 11:03, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q81326380

RuPaul's Secret Celebrity Drag Race (Q81326380): American television series from 2020: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wrong translation --NickBR (talk) 16:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

we need a number, not a name. Quakewoody (talk) 11:06, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
@Quakewoody: I fix the title. @NickBR: What do you think is the correct translation? 轻语者 (talk) 01:02, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

I didn't want to assume that was the one he was talking about. Quakewoody (talk) 01:23, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Item looks okay. Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:59, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q63349851

Calo (Q63349851): German rapper: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fun-Entry of some Student Wurgl (talk) 00:11, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Is that the right QID? Quakewoody (talk)

Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:57, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q81767477

Q81767477: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable (with family) Nadzik (talk) 13:00, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:10, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q51647328

Q51647328: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lack of notability and no sitelink (old sitelink, identical problem: سيرة لشخصية لا تستوفي معايير السير الشخصية: نقاش حذف) Eihel (talk) 16:09, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

A specialist perhaps: User:باسم, what do you think about this Item and this page (User:إسلام)? Thank you. —Eihel (talk) 17:31, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

@Eihel: the ar.Wikipedia community, including kuwaiti members, have decided that this late person doesn't achive the required standerds. The Article has been deleted several times, and i advise this item to be deleted as well. Bestباسم (talk) 19:26, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

The link is sibling (P3373). I deleted this link. We agree:

Delete. —Eihel (talk) 21:27, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Delete Per above. Have not enought notability. 轻语者 (talk) 01:05, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Weak oppose I think it can be kept, because there's a structural need. We've kept siblings before of notable persons. Robin van der Vliet (talk) (contribs) 23:30, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

But under what circumstance do we keep non-notable family members? This, from what I can tell, fails those circumstances based on what I consider when adding/keeping non-notable family. Quakewoody (talk) 03:19, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

@Robin van der Vliet: Hello, Your opinion is important, in both directions. Like deleting properties, are you against deleting or against the Item? Prefer the {{Vk}} (vote keep the Item) or {{Vd}} (vote delete the Item) templates, please. In order to ensure that the admins closing these discussions have a clear understanding of your position, please use the templates : {{Keep}}, {{Vote delete}} (please avoid {{Support}} and {{Oppose}}). Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 23:57, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment seems to be entirely unreferenced and lacking any link beyond P1038 to other items.

Question is the "type of kinship" at Q51647328#P1038 correct? It currently reads that Q12240740 is a maternal uncle. --- Jura 11:09, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:10, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q240270

xyloid lignite (Q240270): waste product generated by the mining of lignite: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of Xylit (Q47148808). The two should be merged. --2003:CA:870E:7096:8977:F007:4FF3:1D4F 22:11, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Comment Doesn't seem to be the same. 轻语者 (talk) 23:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Not sure why you would believe that they're different....See, for example, https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xylit_(Kohle) and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xylit. Anybody with basic knowledge of English and German can confirm that these two articles are about the same thing, and yet they don't link with each other. The German article is simply disambiguated with "Kohle" (coal) because the word "Xylit" in German can also refer to xylitol. Both articles are talking about the woody substance, found together with lignite deposits, that hasn't yet fully formed into coal, and which is used to make potting soils and such. -2003:CA:870E:7096:8977:F007:4FF3:1D4F 07:25, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

I Merged both items based on this discussion and my (somewhat limited) understanding of the connected articles. —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:57, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

So

Not done, but fixed: Q47148808 merged into Q240270. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 11:10, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Q13091280

Wodyetia (Q13091280): genus of plants: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It is the same as Q2388306. They should be merged. --77.82.215.14 10:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:10, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

According to the information found on each item, the two items are different. But science isn't my area. Quakewoody (talk) 15:21, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment The Wikipedia article describes the same species and should probably be merged. But Wikispecies does not introduce the same thing. 轻语者 (talk) 04:06, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment One is the genus, the other is the species, I see no reason for merging. Culex (talk) 11:10, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment I agree with user Culex. Note that the two entities have different values for Global Biodiversity Information Facility ID, for instance. William Avery (talk) 11:14, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment They shouldn't be merged, as per above. One is for the species, and the other for the genus. We wouldn't merge Homo sapiens (Q15978631) with Homo (Q171283) or dog (Q144) with Canis (Q149892), so why should we merge Wodyetia bifurcata (Q2388306) with Wodyetia (Q13091280)? –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 11:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC).

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.: can some expert please have a look (and merge, if necessary)? Thanks, MisterSynergy (talk) 11:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

@MisterSynergy: User:Culex has already explained cogently why they should not be merged. one even has the other as a parent taxon. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Not deleted per comments above; thank you all —MisterSynergy (talk) 11:49, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC)