Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2019/01/10
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
DELETE IMAGES: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Revoking "wiki" right to use my images as the owner of the images. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Claridge_Atlantic_City_(Night).JPG https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trump_Taj_Mahal_and_Chairman_Tower.JPG https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Resorts_Atlantic_City_-_Boardwalk_Entrance.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pier_Shops_at_Caesars.jpg
thank you B64 (talk) 01:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- @B64: These images are hosted on commons.wikimedia.org, so you need to request deletion of the images there. Wikidata is only linking to images, not hosting them. --Pasleim (talk) 14:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- So,
Not done, as this is not the right place for this request. - cycŋ - (talk • contribs • logs) 07:09, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- So,
Chinguetti Department (Q60521714): department of Mauritania: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Existed already as Q3708696, I just did not find it, sorry --Der Reisende (talk) 14:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Done Redirect created by User:Cycn, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:10, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
science award (Q11448906): award for science: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
A science award is suggested to be needed as a subclass of award. However, no argument is given why it is needed, it is redundant and even the suggested use fails because many awards given to people for their scientific work cannot be marked as a science award. Awards that are in a high regard like an OBE in England. Given the behaviour of the proponents; disparaging the competence of others, the discussion has not been civil. There are no solid arguments why we should have this item so it can e deleted --GerardM (talk) 06:56, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:00, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Happy to sort that one out. GerardM (talk) 07:03, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Valid sitelink (WD:N #1), fulfills structural need (WD:N #3). Bencemac (talk) 08:09, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Not really an issue, what this request will achieve is remove it as a subclass. Thanks, GerardM (talk) 08:44, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted. There is a sitelink to jawiki and structural need beyond the subclass hierarchy and its related use in other items. This decision does not imply that no changes should be made to the use of that item; it just means that deletion is no viable path to easily get rid of it. —MisterSynergy (talk) 08:43, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Q610491: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Ill defined item. Split between Q51159758 and Q25425428, can be deleted once identifier moved
--- Jura 14:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- replaced uses with the one of the two others.
--- Jura 14:13, 18 August 2018 (UTC) - Can't we have "disambiguation items"? Like Wikipedia article covering multiple topics (Q21484471)? --Infovarius (talk) 21:34, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Surely, most articles do that anyways. But why make Q6140491 labeled "parricide" in one language and "patricide" in another? Even worse, defined as one thing in one language and another thing in another language. https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?oldid=726730997 It's just unlikely that it gets used correctly.
--- Jura 05:26, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Surely, most articles do that anyways. But why make Q6140491 labeled "parricide" in one language and "patricide" in another? Even worse, defined as one thing in one language and another thing in another language. https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?oldid=726730997 It's just unlikely that it gets used correctly.
Keep Matched to a 'BNCF Thesaurus ID'. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:34, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- How would it be labeled? That should probably go on Q51159758.
--- Jura 05:15, 22 August 2018 (UTC)- Done: copied there. --- Jura 02:20, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
- So now we have the same ID on two items? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:35, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
- Done: copied there. --- Jura 02:20, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
- How would it be labeled? That should probably go on Q51159758.
.JPG){kind=link}
I've restored the labels to this item, that match the name used on the BNCF Thesaurus entry. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:01, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- I restored everything. Otherwise it can't be assessed correctly. --- Jura 02:20, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not clear why you have restored labels that clearly refer to a different concept than the linked 'BNCF Thesaurus ID' item. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:35, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
- At least we agree on my statement at the beginning of this deletion request. --- Jura 18:42, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
- Once again: Don't try to put words into my mouth. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- At least we agree on my statement at the beginning of this deletion request. --- Jura 18:42, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not clear why you have restored labels that clearly refer to a different concept than the linked 'BNCF Thesaurus ID' item. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:35, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep "Sonzoku-satsu" (killing one's father/mother/uncle/aunt/grandfather/grandmother etc.) & petricide (killing one's father) is different. These two data should not be merged. --Ohtani tanya (talk) 05:01, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Ohtani tanya: Q610491 is listed for deletion as it's a mess (less so now as many of the statements and sitelinks have been moved). We do have separate items at Q51159758 and Q25425428. Should "Sonzoku-satsu" go there or even be on a third item? --- Jura 10:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
@Pigsonthewing, Ohtani tanya: To me it seems that all data has been correctly moved to either parricide (Q51159758) or patricide (Q10345565). Do you still think Q610491 should be kept? --Pasleim (talk) 19:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Q60386772: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No assertion of notability, no links from other items, only Wikimedia sitelink is a user page --Jamie7687 (talk) 06:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Q60529818: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty David (talk) 06:29, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Q60524988: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty David (talk) 06:29, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Q60529353: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Does not seem to fulfill notability requirements. Mormegil (talk) 08:13, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Q60290086: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Repeate spam by non-notable person; deletions have occurred previously — billinghurst sDrewth 10:19, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
invalid ID (L40904): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Looking at username most probably autopromo --KaMan (talk) 10:46, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
invalid ID (L40908): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not a lexemes --KaMan (talk) 10:48, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Bimlesh Adhikari (Q27824178): Nepalese actor and professional model: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty David (talk) 06:31, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:Pasleim, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:10, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Q21555536: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable, all wiki pages were deleted. Adelsheim (talk) 09:34, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
@Adelsheim: There are still two sitelinks on Category:Kissami family (Q21994992) which you created. If the categories are notable, then basically Q21555536 is notable too because of structural need. --Pasleim (talk) 18:55, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Edinger (Q36883935): family name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty item, merged with Q243507 Taivo (talk) 16:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:40, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Jura1, Harmonia Amanda: Thoughts? Mahir256 (talk) 18:30, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Nope, should be kept separated, one is about a name and the other one is a disambiguation page. Two different things, so two items needed. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 18:33, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Taivo: LUA can give you interwikis on de:Edinger to pages linked from both items: Q243507, but also Q36883935. Template:Interwikis from P1889 (family names) (Q56475678) could be adapted and added to de:Template:Begriffsklärung --- Jura 07:41, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- Actually I do not understand, what means LUA (Q15184295? How it is relevant here?) and why Harmonia reverted my edits. They are both about the same family name (I checked orthography). Taivo (talk) 07:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- I think the page in German is a disambiguation page. This is not true for w:Erdinger. Accordingly, the items at Wikidata have different statements. --- Jura 07:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- First sentence "Edinger ist der Familienname folgender Personen" means "Edinger is family name of these persons". That means: German article is about family name. All three other articles (French, Polish, Portuguese) are also about family name. Taivo (talk) 17:31, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- I think you would need to remove the notice at the bottom of the page. Otherwise, German Wikipedia sees it as a disambiguation page. --- Jura 17:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- First sentence "Edinger ist der Familienname folgender Personen" means "Edinger is family name of these persons". That means: German article is about family name. All three other articles (French, Polish, Portuguese) are also about family name. Taivo (talk) 17:31, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- I think the page in German is a disambiguation page. This is not true for w:Erdinger. Accordingly, the items at Wikidata have different statements. --- Jura 07:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- Actually I do not understand, what means LUA (Q15184295? How it is relevant here?) and why Harmonia reverted my edits. They are both about the same family name (I checked orthography). Taivo (talk) 07:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
This is bonkers. It's clear that all the Wikipedia sitelinks are lists of people with the surname Edinger, yet we let our own obsession with family name has to use a different item than disambiguation page (Q27924673) prevent us from putting the sitelinks together. I strongly support merging. Deryck Chan (talk) 14:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per Harmonia Amanda. No matter what actually contains in pages from both items, there are two different items with two (technically) different kinds of information, for disambig and for surname, and there should not be another opinion but keeping them separated. We can't convince the users of the German Wikipedia (and of some other ones) not to set the surname lists as common/unspecified disambugiation pages, and it's not among Wikidata goals. --Wolverène (talk) 00:05, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Not done no consensus for deletion --Pasleim (talk) 13:05, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Q57516189: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Doesn't meet the notability criteria. No sitelinks, internal links or references. The only external ID is the company's facebook account. Kam Solusar (talk) 18:18, 10 January 2019 (UTC)