User talk:Deryck Chan

Jump to: navigation, search

About this board

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Deryck Chan/Archive 1 on 2015-08-24.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

WMF Surveys, 00:50, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Reply to "Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey"

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

WMF Surveys, 01:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Reply to "Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey"

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

WMF Surveys, 18:57, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reply to "Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey"

sourcing circumstances (P1480): acting (Q4676846)

8
Multichill (talkcontribs)
Deryck Chan (talkcontribs)
Multichill (talkcontribs)

Ok, I undid this edit. Good luck with finding a better qualifier. Can you ping me when you find one?

Deryck Chan (talkcontribs)

It would appear that subject has role (P2868) is the best for now, even though these aren't really "roles" for the subject to be in, until we can think of another one.

Multichill (talkcontribs)

Funny, that property also talks about acting, just the different kind of acting. It seems to be an improvement to use that one.

Deryck Chan (talkcontribs)
Jura1 (talkcontribs)

If you consider operating the script once more in the future, please ensure that you are able to clean-up things yourself.

This has taken almost 4 months to resolve.

Deryck Chan (talkcontribs)

I can port the statements out anytime, but we need to decide where they're going first! While there's a rough consensus that P1480 isn't a good place to keep these qualifiers, I do think there's also a consensus against reverting them to the now-deleted P794. As I wrote in WD:PFD, I'm happy to run the script again to move the qualifiers to whichever property as soon as we agree on it.

Reply to "sourcing circumstances (P1480): acting (Q4676846)"
Deryck Chan (talkcontribs)

This is a thread to generate internal shortlinks so I can share SPARQL queries without pasting the entire SPARQL code onto a discussion page.

Deryck Chan (talkcontribs)
SELECT DISTINCT ?asObject ?asObjectLabel
WHERE
{
  ?prop pq:P794 ?asObject .
  hint:Query hint:optimizer "None" .	
  ?item ?p ?prop . 
  ?property wikibase:claim ?p .  
  ?property wikibase:statementProperty ?ps .
  ?prop ?ps ?value .      
  wd:P108 wikibase:claim ?p .   
  ?asObject wdt:P31/wdt:P279* wd:Q12737077 .
  SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "en"  }    
}
LIMIT 1000

link

Reply to "SPARQL"
Liuxinyu970226 (talkcontribs)
Deryck Chan (talkcontribs)

我重新思考了一下。你說得對,的確有好多日本和挪威的車站使用這個屬性,但是它們大部分都是 constraint violation - 有些缺了 catalog (P972),有些不是ASCII字符(有日語假名或挪語特殊字符)。

另一個可行解決辦法是放鬆 Regex \w+ 條件、放鬆 P972 修飾子條件(因為前文後理應該不會混淆)、放鬆必須是鐵路車站的條件(例如可以是巴士站代碼)。但現時的 P296 範圍既一方面太窄、另一方面又太鬆,在不改變使用條件的情況下,寧可玉碎。

Reply to "請您重新考慮於Wikidata:Properties_for_deletion#P296的發言可以麼?"

Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

(That message in other languages: العربية • ‎bosanski • ‎català • ‎Deutsch • ‎Esperanto • ‎français • ‎עברית • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎اردو • ‎中文 – ‎translate that message)

Hello!

Like some other community members, you are using Flow.

An increasing number of communities now use Flow or are considering it. Although Flow itself is not scheduled for major development during 2016 fiscal year, the Collaboration Team remains interested in the project and in providing an improved system for structured discussions.

You can help us make decisions about the way forward in this area by sharing your thoughts about Flow — what works, doesn't work or should be improved?

Please fill out this survey (available in multiple languages), which is administered by a third-party service. It will not require an email or your username. See our privacy statement.

Thanks for your ideas and opinions about Flow!

Trizek (WMF), on behalf of the Collaboration team, 11:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Reply to "Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey"
There are no older topics