Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2018/12/25

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q60125000

Minister of the National Economy of Greece (Q60125000): Greek government minister: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of Q19904305, my mistake FocalPoint (talk) 21:20, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done Redirect created by User:Rachmat04, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Edit group QSv2T/1544979245788

Summary #quickstatements; Author Trilotat
Number of edits 9 (more statistics) Example edit Q59863644

Can an administrator please undo this edit group? 

Trilotat (talk) 08:36, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

It appears that every item I've checked so far in the batch is a duplicate (as demonstrated by the ORCID constraint violation.)

 Not deleted; all but one were merged by someone else. The only remaining one does not seem to be a duplicate. —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:05, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q60134011

Q60134011: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable ARR8 (talk) 05:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:10, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q60128795

Q60128795: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Nonsense ARR8 (talk) 05:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:10, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q60112756

Q60112756: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Nonsense ARR8 (talk) 05:06, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:10, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q60111822

Natalija Miladinović (Q60111822): Serbian artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable ARR8 (talk) 05:07, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

 Not deleted (has 2 sitelinks) —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:07, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q60054940

Q60054940: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item contains no data. Wildly boy (talk) 15:43, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:50, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q59362047

Q59362047: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Nonsense, out of scope Hedwig in Washington (talk) 02:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

All Wikipedia articles about this subject have been deleted. Lazypub (talk)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q57084536

Q57084536: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable ARR8 (talk) 04:56, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q59783877

Q59783877: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable ARR8 (talk) 04:57, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q60028616

Q60028616: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable ARR8 (talk) 04:57, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q59784041

Q59784041: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable ARR8 (talk) 04:57, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Envitrans

  1. Q60045047 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q60045451 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q60046039 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

No evidence of notability. Only link to each other, no sitelinks, no authority control. Created by anon having no other edits to Wikidata. Tacsipacsi (talk) 00:12, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

I find no evidence of notability. Three non-notable items shouldn't get a free-pass just because they link to each other. Lazypub (talk) 02:41, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
✓ Deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:59, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q4653260

APCO Worldwide (Q4653260): PR firm based in Washington, D.C.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q5885 is proper and correct Info-farmer (talk) 09:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

@Info-farmer: I don’t understand your request, as the items you mentioned seem unrelated. What’s the problem here to your opinion? —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:15, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Q5885 represents Tamil language which is having proper details. Q4653260 is also represents Tamil language and it is incorrect. So, Q4653260 is to be deleted--Info-farmer (talk) 09:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Q4653260 is about a consultancy company "APCO Worldwide", not about Tamil language. Can you please verify whether you gave the correct Q-identifier? Thanks, —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:26, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
i confused with the label and corrected the label and added Tamil language description. Nothing to be deleted. Thanks for your concersation.--Info-farmer (talk) 09:37, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks,  Not deleted then. —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:57, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

DJs/musical producers

✓ Deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:44, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q18719084

Q18719084: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No entry exists in the project Jd22292 (talk) 17:04, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Q36558205

Q36558205: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No entry exists in the project. Jd22292 (talk) 17:05, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Genes

All ✓ Done —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:44, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q18973804

ACalpha (Q18973804): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate Magnus Manske (talk) 12:05, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

@Magnus Manske: What is this (and what are the other two below) a duplicate of? I see a couple of things which this could be a duplicate of, and I want to be sure that I merge this item into the right one. Mahir256 (talk) 20:35, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
@Magnus Manske, Mahir256: Doing a quick SPARQL query on genomic start (P644) = 154855, it seeems this is a duplicate of ACalpha (Q18973821)? -- Fuzheado (talk) 16:34, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Q19049452

PF3D7_0613000 (Q19049452): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate Magnus Manske (talk) 12:07, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

@Magnus Manske: Can you confirm this is a duplicate of PF3D7_0613000 (Q19049541)? -- Fuzheado (talk) 16:37, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Q19033865

KAE1 (Q19033865): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate Magnus Manske (talk) 12:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

@Magnus Manske: Can you confirm this is a duplicate of KAE1 (Q19034002)? -- Fuzheado (talk) 16:39, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

All these were accidental duplicates created during tests. ACalpha (Q18973804) is a duplicate of ACalpha (Q18973821) and so on. In all cases, I have removed the GeneDB ID (P3382) to avoid conflicts in querying for that property. PF3D7_0613000 (Q19049452) is a duplicate of PF3D7_0613000 (Q19049541), KAE1 (Q19033865) of KAE1 (Q19034002). --Magnus Manske (talk) 13:18, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q60153721

Gallia Préhistoire (Q60153721): journal: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Copy of Q15762215. Thanks --CptKeyes (talk) 16:37, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done Redirect created by User:MisterSynergy, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:50, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q16811696

Q16811696: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty Bodhisattwa (talk) 18:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:50, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q7248614

Q7248614: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Sole connected article has since been deleted. Website with no real claim to notability, out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 17:28, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q20080352

Q20080352: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Cross-wiki spam, out of scope. Corresponding articles will likely be deleted. Hiàn (talk) 18:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:10, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
I would support the deletion if it weren't for the Wikipedia entry. And without investigating the claim of "spam", I can very quickly see - all 8 items linking to the page were created by the two users, and their only contributions have been to J-Pimp items. IMDb does not delete pages, but his IMDB page has been blanked, which means he had false credits at one point. And other sources like VIAF and ISNI have not picked him up. Lazypub (talk)
Did I see that his page was deleted as I was typing? And it has been deleted 3 times previously.Lazypub (talk)
Should we look into deleting the artist's albums items?Lazypub (talk)
It's been recreated at htwiki by the same user (or a sock of it, I can't remember). Obviously none of these articles (including the album ones) have any place on WMF wikis but the htwiki articles have yet to be dealt with. Unfortunately the users have taken to outright removing the speedy deletion tag without explanation so I've been waiting for GS or local sysop action. Furthermore I have a glock request pending for all related sockpuppets. Hiàn (talk) 01:56, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
@Wolverène, Lazypub: All articles have since been deleted - I'm thinking the request can proceed. Hiàn (talk) 23:09, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
I support the deletion of the item(s). And I would like to see a filter added (if Wikidata has that ability) to prevent the re-creation. Lazypub (talk) 23:18, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q56612047

Q56612047: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional cross-wiki spam. Out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 23:10, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

I support the deletion of the item(s). And I would like to see a filter added (if Wikidata has that ability) to prevent the re-creation. Lazypub (talk) 23:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:20, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q56259267

Cross-wiki promotional spam. Out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 23:12, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

I support the deletion of the item(s). And I would like to see a filter added (if Wikidata has that ability) to prevent the re-creation. Lazypub (talk) 23:17, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q60149393

Q60149393: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability not shown. Steak (talk) 13:28, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q60149165

Q60149165: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability not shown. Steak (talk) 13:31, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q60147885

Q60147885: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability not shown. Steak (talk) 13:33, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q60147634

Q60147634: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability not shown. Steak (talk) 13:34, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q60147423

Q60147423: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability not shown. Steak (talk) 13:35, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q60147330

Q60147330: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability not shown. Steak (talk) 13:36, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q60146922

Q60146922: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability not shown. Steak (talk) 13:37, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:40, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q60055203

Q60055203: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item does not meet notability requirements. Wildly boy (talk) 14:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q22865520

Q22865520: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty element --VladXe (talk) 18:55, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q21169216

actress (Q21169216): female actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This element provokes inexperienced users to specify it as Property:P106 for women actors Ghuron (talk) 11:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
There is a Wikiquote link about "actress", which is different from "actor". What should we do instead? I'm open to suggestions :-) but of course we cannot simply delete this item without deciding how to deal with the link. --Superchilum(talk to me!) 19:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
 Not deleted due to the sitelink. The P106 problem is actually not that much of a problem: there is a bot job that automatically fixes those cases regularly. —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:56, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q60153148

2019 in Canada (Q60153148): list of events: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by mistake --Jazin (talk) 16:05, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

 Not deleted; there is a sitelink again —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q38127682

Q38127682: Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merged with Q1413677 FocalPoint (talk) 18:26, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Shifted the elwiki sitelink back to Q38127682. It is a dab page which should not be merged into a non-dab item.  Not deleted —MisterSynergy (talk) 20:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q52152046

Alias Guacho (Q52152046): Ecuadorian member of Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The truth, I am at the crossroads of renaming the article. Disappear this name, delete this element. Rename it to Alias Guacho. Because there are not enough elements to verify that the name is this, only certain press strips. They also speculate like us. In Ecuador we have certain government offices, where you can consult data of a public nature (Webs: https://servicios.registrocivil.gob.ec/cdd/ OR https://declaraciones.sri.gob.ec/sri-en-linea/#/SriDeclaracionesWeb/ConsultaImpuestoRenta/Consultas/consultaImpuestoRenta). As it is: birth, income tax returns, and a person's identity card. In none, this element appears. And that we have the full name data, and its date of birth, provided by the press. So, the application itself, tries to erase the current name or change it, and in the section (also known as) leave the name Walter Patricio Artizala Vernaza. Following the principle of: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Convenciones_de_t%C3%ADtulos#Usar_los_nombres_m%C3%A1s_conocidos --Berposen (talk) 16:01, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

 Not deleted; if the name is not appropriate, you can change labels and aliases and also remove names which are completely wrong. There is no need to delete the item to "disappear this name". If you have questions regarding this case, you can contact me on my user talk page for further advice. —MisterSynergy (talk) 20:12, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q56761669

concentrated solar power (Q56761669): technology which uses mirrors or lenses to concentrate a large area of solar energy onto a small area: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleting item: (Q56761669) formerly called concentrated solar power, by merging it back to: thermal solar power station (Q285927) . Same topic. Same meaning of titles. Item is currently empty of links and content as I moved them back to thermal solar power station (Q285927) . --Alcea setosa (talk) 02:12, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

To me a " thermal solar power station" (a building complex, subclass of thermal power station (Q200297)) and "concentrated solar power" (a type of technology, subclass of solar thermal energy (Q303288))"... are not the same thing, but if this folk insists... It is empty of links because Alcea setosa removed them. strakhov (talk) 06:05, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
1 "It is empty of links because Alcea setosa removed" Yes as stated by me above I removed them. 2 "but if this folk insists" I am not insisting, but the item is now empty of content and by only adding the technology subclass it may still contain to little information to be very useful. Is there a (de facto) policy to not mix buildings and technology?--Alcea setosa (talk) 07:44, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
By the way, if they were the "same everything", Q56761669 should be merged, not deleted. strakhov (talk) 06:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
OK, and you oppose both deletion and merge but favour merge over deletion?--Alcea setosa (talk) 07:54, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
I favour keeping both of them, because they are different things, and even lumping the sitelinks together in one of them... the extra item would still have structural value. And I do not understand what's the point of blanking an entire item (labels included) before requesting its deletion. strakhov (talk) 11:02, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
For all intents and purposes they are the same thing. You can't have this type of technology without a building or structure, this is true of a lot of things such as item concentrated photovoltaics (Q2065094). On the other hand there are many instances were a distinction is made such as combined heat and power plant (Q1601458) / cogeneration (Q221620). For structural value the items should at least link to each other, as far as I can see concentrated solar power (Q56761669) has never linked to thermal solar power station (Q285927) so I did not see much structural value in it. The label concentrated solar power is in conflict with the Also known as section of thermal solar power station (Q285927) as CSP is listed as an alternativ name there. CSP is an abbreviation of concentrated solar power.--Alcea setosa (talk) 23:06, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
I do not know your purposes or intents, neither do I care. Facts are
1) a technology and a type of plant are not the same thing. Same way nuclear power (Q12739) not equal to nuclear power plant (Q134447).
2) Q56761669 was linked (even after your "intervention" removing valid sitelinks and lumping them together) in thermal solar power station (Q285927), throught "facet of (P1269)".
3) There are different articles in es.wikipedia ([1] vs [2]) for the "concentrated thermal plant" and for the "concentrated thermal technology" ( and I did not create them).
4) the en.wikipedia sitelink Concentrated solar power (and several others: it, gl,...) is not aligned with its wikipedia label ("thermal solar power station) nor with its subclass of (P279) values.
So please, stop wasting people's time merging things that should not be merged. strakhov (talk) 11:59, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
You do give the impression of not caring by not bother to try to understanding my answer, but anyway since we are talking about it here I am not sure I follow your line of thought given you started a sentence by "To me".--Alcea setosa (talk) 22:42, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
3) Yes thank you for your very recent contribution [3] hope you did not find it a terrible waste of time this time to find that somewhat obscure article in Spanish Wikipedia. When you created this item concentrated solar power (Q2065094) in September 2018 and, removed the sitelinks to enwiki, eswiki, iowiki and itwiki from thermal solar power station (Q285927) you did not add any new sitelinks. So you effectively split an item and for what reason that is my point, not to link from an article in eswiki anyway as you did not.. --Alcea setosa (talk) 00:24, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
4) It is a minor issue if the title of some sitelinks do not correspond perfectly to the label, what matters more is the subject of the articles. The original label was ("concentrated solar power) added back in 2013 and unceremoniously changed to ("concentrated solar power station) in 2015. Most sitelink titles where still not referring to power plants specifically, still no one split the item. Statements ("Solar thermal power plants" and "thermal power station") where added in 2013 and 2014. Also what the gl.wikipedia article title "Central térmica solar" refer to appear to be a power plant as in "Central térmica".--Alcea setosa (talk) 03:35, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
2) My concern here is that concentrated solar power (Q2065094) is not linked to thermal solar power station (Q285927), not the other way around. That is if you are searching for "Concentrated solar power" and find concentrated solar power (Q2065094) all that is there are links to Spanish Wikipedia (and at most some but not all other language Wikipedias with articles on this topic) and no links to thermal solar power station (Q285927) and the other language Wikipedias with articles on this topic. --Alcea setosa (talk) 04:58, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

The point of separating different concepts is... precisely that. Anyway, since it happens to be different articles for each item in the same Wikipedia... your merging/deleting crusade (TBH I do not get much your line of thought either) is doomed, whether it concerns you an item being linked from that one or vice versa... Or not. strakhov (talk) 23:26, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --MatSuBot (talk) 12:48, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

 Not deleted; there are sitelinks to eswiki for all items involved which make it impossible to delete anything here. —MisterSynergy (talk) 20:18, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q59247886

Q59247886: doctoral thesis by Manreet Kaur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate Satdeep Gill (talk) 23:11, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:20, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate of what, @Satdeep Gill:? Can you link the item it's a duplicate of, please?  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cycn (talk • contribs) at 08:15, 6 December 2018 (UTC).
@Satdeep Gill: the previous ping was not sent, please take a look. Bencemac (talk) 09:26, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

 Not deleted; no duplicate reported, thus no action; if there is a duplicate, you’d need to follow Help:Merge anyway. —MisterSynergy (talk) 20:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q14939813

Q14939813: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Blank data(the article has been deleted in 2010). Moreover this term is used in Japan in insulting some TV personalities, I think this data should not keep & be added to the data of persons. --Ohtani tanya (talk) 04:46, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

it may not have an WP article, but it is only blank because you just deleted all of the data it had. I have no opinion as to if we should keep it or not, but the very fact that you said Moreover this term is used in Japan in insulting some TV personalities, means it exists. It may be an insult, but it exists, so we should consider keeping it somewhere. Maybe as a Lexeme or in Wiktionary.Lazypub (talk)
I've restored the data you removed. If the item gets deleted, the data will be removed with the item. But there is no reason to try to sway the result by blanking the item in advance.Lazypub (talk)
Or, you could revert my edit and we can start an edit war. LOL. Lazypub (talk)
@Lazypub: Thanks for your opinion, but I had to revert your edit because it may conflict with WP:BLP. I won't like to start edit war, so I ask you NOT to repeat the same edit. --Ohtani tanya (talk) 12:36, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
May conflict is different than does conflict. And I only want the information there because pages should not be blanked when there is an open discussion. So I will ask that you revert yourself. Lazypub (talk)
On no account should such derogatory statements be restored; doubly so as they are unsourced. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:53, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Is it derogatory? Or is it only perceived as derogatory by the nominator? If I called someone a Scream Queen or a Reality Show contestant, some would be insulted. Some people get insulted by the term Hair Metal or Bro-Country. No different than the nominator's phrase, used in Japan in insulting some TV personalities. The emphasis being the word some. How is it an insult to some but not others. I know many 1980s hair metal bands that hate the term Hair Metal and deny being part of it. Does that mean it didn't exist or that they were not part of it?. Lazypub (talk)

✓ Deleted; barely any content, no sitelink, no backlinks, no identifiers, no references. I do not question that the term exists, but if there is no improvement for weeks, we cannot keep it in this shape. If anyone is interested in this item, please ask for undeletion; I’d expect that the mentioned issues are addressed quickly after a possible undeletion. —MisterSynergy (talk) 20:28, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Q59638288

Q59638288: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable ARR8 (talk) 20:41, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

I filled in some data, but I think he still fails notability. Lazypub (talk)
Interesting that you were able to find information. I hadn't heard of him, and assumed from the self-promotion that it was another nobody. So, I'll leave it up to you. If you say he fails notability, then I believe you. ARR8 (talk) 23:22, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Not everyone has Beyonce-level name recognition. It doesn't mean they don't exist. But, simply existing doesn't mean someone is notable. Lazypub (talk) 23:34, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Of course, but given that the user was making their own Wikidata entry... ARR8 (talk) 03:27, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

This can probably just be deleted. ARR8 (talk) 05:11, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done, I deleted. I do not see how this person is notable against our criteria at the moment.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:27, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2018/12/25&oldid=820112927"