The idea is to try and group Wikidatians that are interested in tracking/modelling what is happening on the interface of Wikidata and Large Language Models, such as ChatGPT.
I thought maybe you would be interested on joining/contributing!
The idea is open-ended, motivated by finding ways to advance the coverage of Wikidata on the topic, and the discussions of our role in this new ecosystem.
Hi Andrew, what is the point of adding noise like this? And why are you running a bot under your own account? I think it's better to add object stated in reference as(P5997) in the reference section.
I agree, I'm not sure about this use of object named as(P1932) as qualifier of instance of(P31); usually P1932 requires a reference. I agree with the suggestion by @Multichill: and I would recommend rollbacking the batch.
Thanks folks, I agree that the object stated in reference as(P5997) solution is a better one and can adjust to using that. It was created relatively recently (2018) without much fanfare so I missed that discussion. As for the actual reference associated with it, it looks as though reference vocabulary(P5967) is preferred over adding full URL links to object pages. I'll put this all into a bot request for further feedback. - ~~~~
Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner.
Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner.
Hi, I noticed this recent edit: diff and a few like it.
Normally subject named as(P1810) would seem to be the qualifier to use for a statement like this, as you are indicating how the source has referred to the subject of the item.
It also looks like it would be worth proposing a property for entries in this database (even if its values would not be linkable).
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.