Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2017/03/06

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q28873972: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by mistake --جار الله (talk) 07:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Nikosguard (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q28873974: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by mistake --جار الله (talk) 07:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Nikosguard (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q28874006: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

User page item MisterSynergy (talk) 08:16, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Nikosguard (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q25343493: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Book chapter that is not in itself notable, interwiki links of chapters is out of scope  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

BTW, all the chapters of this book have their own item. Or delete them all, or keep them all. I  Support deletion. Q.Zanden questions? 15:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 Neutral - there are 40 other chapter items for this book. I we delete any or all of them, what's preventing there recreation? - cycŋ - (talkcontribslogs) 15:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Here's the complete list of chapters: Q25343493, Q24880619, Q24880613, Q25343503, Q25343540, Q25343518, Q25343490, Q25343488, Q25343546, Q25343538, Q25343544, Q25343506, Q25343521, Q25343499, Q24880614, Q25343496, Q25343497, Q25343512, Q25343533, Q24880616, Q25343542, Q25343509, Q25343500, Q24880612, Q25343485, Q25343532, Q25343545, Q25343492, Q25343514, Q25343477, Q25343502, Q25343491, Q25343505, Q25343536, Q25343527, Q24880617, Q24880618, Q25343507, Q25343508, Q25343534 and Q25343504. - cycŋ - (talkcontribslogs) 15:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by Nikosguard (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:11, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Bulk deletion: Item created by @Kippelboy: and no more notable

  • Only istanza di (P31)and no other claim
  • No sitelink
  • No backlink
  • Without reference
  • Without usage using "Wikis subscribed to this entity"
  • Checked 3 March from 18:32 to 20:39 CET
  1. Q21075544 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q21077463 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q21088752 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Does not meet the notability policy ValterVB (talk) 22:43, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done 1 item merged 2 deleted--Nikosguard talk 09:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Bulk deletion: Item created by @Manu1400: and no more notable

  • Only istanza di (P31)and no other claim
  • No sitelink
  • No backlink
  • Without reference
  • Without usage using "Wikis subscribed to this entity"
  • Checked 3 March from 18:32 to 20:39 CET
  1. Q27865995 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q27865993 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q27865998 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q27866002 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q27866000 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q27866019 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q27889965 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Does not meet the notability policy ValterVB (talk) 21:05, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Nikosguard (talkcontribslogs) --Lymantria (talk) 10:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Bulk deletion: Item created by @Joshbaumgartner: and no more notable

  • Only istanza di (P31)and no other claim
  • No sitelink
  • No backlink
  • Without reference
  • Without usage using "Wikis subscribed to this entity"
  • Checked 3 March from 18:32 to 20:39 CET
  1. Q18520207 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q19914606 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q20630284 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q20630288 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Does not meet the notability policy ValterVB (talk) 21:40, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

@Joshbaumgartner: for P-12 (Q18520207) have you a source at least for manufacturer (P176) or for total produced (P1092)? --ValterVB (talk) 22:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
@ValterVB: That's from enwiki, but that sourcing could be improved of course. Josh Baumgartner (talk) 23:27, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
@Joshbaumgartner: The sourcing must be improved, because the item at the moment isn't notable. You say: "That's from enwiki" but I don't see sitelink. If exist on some wiki can you add sitelink? --ValterVB (talk) 23:45, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
@ValterVB: Wikipedia articles sometimes discuss concepts within the article text. A sitelink cannot be created because the whole article is not about the concept, just a small section of it. An item is notable even if it doesn't contain any references so long as suitable references are available – the solution then is to add the references not delete the item. SJK (talk) 02:51, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
@SJK: If there a small section on it, it's possible to create a redirect. Fast create a blank page with the name. Then you interlink it on Wikidata. Afterwards you edit the article to be a redirect. ChristianKl (talk) 13:36, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
@ChristianKl: That hacky workaround doesn't work so well in this case. The problem is that English Wikipedia has one article (en:Boeing_P-12) for a whole series of 13 aircraft models, of which item item Q18520207 is one of those models–the series and the model have the same name since this was the original model of the series. There is no section about the model, there is a paragraph under en:Boeing_P-12#Variants. Now, maybe someone could add anchors to the article and then use your blank page-redirect hack. But this seems a lot of make-busy work just to keep overzealous deletionism at bay. SJK (talk) 13:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
I think it's helpful when a user of Wikidata sees which Wikipedia article discusses a concept. ChristianKl (talk) 13:58, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
found and added source, en passant according to the source total production of the model was 10 not 9 --ValterVB (talk) 14:10, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
@Joshbaumgartner: Now remain tailstrike (Q19914606). It has something to do with tailstrike (Q1423039)? --ValterVB (talk) 14:58, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Dealt with, no more action needed. Lymantria (talk) 10:15, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q11855902: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty MiPe (talk) 10:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by HakanIST (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q17411820: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only item was just removed from the itwiki --- cycŋ - (talkcontribslogs) 11:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by HakanIST (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q17120830: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only entry was just deleted from the itwiki --- cycŋ - (talkcontribslogs) 12:44, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Lymantria (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Stapleton (Q28874571): family name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate, newly created  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Redirect created by Lymantria, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Bulk deletion: Item created by @GerardM: and no more notable

  • Only istanza di (P31)and no other claim
  • No sitelink
  • No backlink
  • Without reference
  • Without usage using "Wikis subscribed to this entity"
  • Checked 3 March from 18:32 to 20:39 CET
  1. Q20978971 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q27350402 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Does not meet the notability policy ValterVB (talk) 23:16, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose "Sadiakhowa Gohain" (Q27350402) is notable – enwiki articles en:Suhungmung and en:Ahom kingdom mention it, and there are multiple books.google.com hits for that phrase as well (books on Indian history). A ten second Google search discovered these facts. You should have researched this item before proposing it for deletion. SJK (talk) 06:36, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Q20978971 (Vroonermeerpolder) as well. This is a notable polder in the Netherlands. It is mentioned by enwiki article en:West_Friesland_(region). Again, you should research things before proposing them for deletion. SJK (talk) 06:38, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done -As both of them are deleted, I mark this section as solved. Q.Zanden questions? 16:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Bulk deletion: Item created by @Dancter: and no more notable

  • Only istanza di (P31)and no other claim
  • No sitelink
  • No backlink
  • Without reference
  • Without usage using "Wikis subscribed to this entity"
  • Checked 3 March from 18:32 to 20:39 CET
  1. Q22666620 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q22666627 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Does not meet the notability policy ValterVB (talk) 23:12, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Lymantria (talkcontribslogs) --16:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q23990609: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No information and no useful. --zallaevan 16:44, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

 Not deleted @zallaevan: has two valid sitelinks. Lymantria (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q19131788: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Page deleted on pl.wikisource Q.Zanden questions? 16:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Lymantria (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Bulk deletion: Item created by @Llywelyn2000: and no more notable

  • Only istanza di (P31)and no other claim
  • No sitelink
  • No backlink
  • Without reference
  • Without usage using "Wikis subscribed to this entity"
  • Checked 3 March from 18:32 to 20:39 CET
  1. Q26787817 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q26804650 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q26805733 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q26805753 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q26814653 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q26820234 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Does not meet the notability policy ValterVB (talk) 21:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

They have all at least one language, one statement and one link to a wiki.  Keep them! Q.Zanden questions? 16:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 Not deleted Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

PsychoPy--Psychophysics software in Python (Q24684122): scientific article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Was on Daniel Mietchen batch of yesterday, but still appears empty.
--- Jura 14:40, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Fixed now. --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 01:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 Not deleted Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:04, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Bulk deletion: Item created by @Vesihiisi: and no more notable

  • Only istanza di (P31)and no other claim
  • No sitelink
  • No backlink
  • Without reference
  • Without usage using "Wikis subscribed to this entity"
  • Checked 3 March from 18:32 to 20:39 CET

Does not meet the notability policy ValterVB (talk) 20:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

This is sample, there are 4768 item in the same condition: only instance of (P31)=family name (Q101352), not used. Are they notable? Notified participants of WikiProject Names --ValterVB (talk) 20:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
And for many (if not all) of them, we can add semi-automatically other properties. I'll try to do that in the next days. We have 57382 family names items not used right now, by the way, and 8991 "clean" unused family names (clean meaning with only one P31 and with only one native label (P1705) since we use family names as strings). Most of them could be used, because we have people with these names on Wikidata. It's just difficult to add bulk family names now seeing that all the old queries we used to do that end now in timeout. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 08:29, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep all. Family names and given names should all be kept. In most cases we will have one or more items for persons having that family name or given name. (And if we don't, the name probably is notable, in that there will exist reliable sources discussing its history – there are many published books on the history of names from different languages/cultures.) SJK (talk) 09:04, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
  • It would be good if these be put to use or at least a source indicated. None of the ones I checked had sitelinks.
    --- Jura 11:26, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

 Not deleted All have at least one incoming link -- structural need. Lymantria (talk) 17:15, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q21815185: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Hoax Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:21, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

@Martin Urbanec: looks like link has been recreated.-- Hakan·IST 17:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
✓ Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
@HakanIST: Is there something to do for me? Looks the item was deleted by Matěj. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Fixed a typo --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q28807110: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item, with no history Q.Zanden questions? 17:06, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q28807113: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item, with no history Q.Zanden questions? 17:06, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q28807137: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item, with no history Q.Zanden questions? 17:07, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q28808008: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item, with no history Q.Zanden questions? 17:07, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q28820813: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item, with no history Q.Zanden questions? 17:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q28820814: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item, with no history Q.Zanden questions? 17:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q28820817: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item, with no history Q.Zanden questions? 17:11, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q28872931: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item, with no history Q.Zanden questions? 17:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q28874039: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item, with no history Q.Zanden questions? 17:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q28874040: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item, with no history Q.Zanden questions? 17:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request

  1. Q28874740 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q28876710 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q28876712 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q28878328 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q28878375 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q28878392 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q28878423 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

empty page, no history Q.Zanden questions? 17:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC) -- Q.Zanden questions? 17:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Matěj Suchánek --Q.Zanden questions? 18:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Mstislav (Q16279795): male given name (Мстислав): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of Q1424569 Ortano (talk) 18:02, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Merged --Q.Zanden questions? 18:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Q17332687: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No more site links, no references, article from Dutch Wikipedia deleted. Ortano (talk) 19:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by HakanIST (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Bulk deletion: Item created by @ChristianKl: and no more notable

  • Only istanza di (P31)and no other claim
  • No sitelink
  • No backlink
  • Without reference
  • Without usage using "Wikis subscribed to this entity"
  • Checked 3 March from 18:32 to 20:39 CET
  1. Q26720718 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q26720717 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q27056812 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Does not meet the notability policy ValterVB (talk) 22:16, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

opponens digiti minimi (Q27056812) is probably a duplicate of opponens digiti minimi muscle of hand (Q1064676) and should be merged instead of deleted. Research things before proposing them for deletion. SJK (talk) 07:12, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

It's not a duplicate. It's supposed to be a superclass of opponens digiti minimi muscle of hand (Q1064676) and opponens digiti minimi of foot (Q1954136). I added the subclass statements to get it linked. ChristianKl (talk) 12:55, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Suspended (Q26720717) will likely be useful for property values about medicines and so should probably kept on that basis. SJK (talk) 07:14, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

refused (Q26720718) should be kept for same reason. SJK (talk) 07:15, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Indeed, these are both meant as property values of medicine marketing authorization (P3464) and so should be kept. SJK (talk) 08:58, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Why is that property practically unused?
--- Jura 12:04, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Probably because the person who asked for it to be created planned to import the data but hadn't got around to it yet. A similar story exists with pregnancy category (P3489) – I proposed it to be created, but it has taken me ages to get around to populating it, because I wasn't 100% sure how to do it and I've been busy with other things. (Now today I have written a script to populate it, so within a couple of hours I should have it populated on several thousand items...) But I assume it is the same story here. If someone plans to do it, we shouldn't delete things just because they haven't got around to doing that yet – far more constructive is to offer to help do it! SJK (talk) 12:23, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Sooner or later ProteinBoxBot will hopefully import the relevant data from the EMA and FDA. The creation of the properties for the corresponding ID's is quite recent. I created the property proposal after discussions on it's talk page (See https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User_talk:ProteinBoxBot). ChristianKl (talk) 13:07, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 Not done Now linked --ValterVB (talk) 20:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Bulk deletion: Item created by @Kopiersperre: and no more notable

  • Only istanza di (P31)and no other claim
  • No sitelink
  • No backlink
  • Without reference
  • Without usage using "Wikis subscribed to this entity"
  • Checked 3 March from 18:32 to 20:39 CET
  1. Q21532272 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q26390227 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q26706168 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Does not meet the notability policy ValterVB (talk) 22:45, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

 Not done now linked or sourced --ValterVB (talk) 20:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Edict of Restitution (Q25406906): 1629 edict of Emperor Ferdinand II to restore the religious and territorial status according to the Peace of Augsburg: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Moved to Q703097 --Ejdzej (talk) 22:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Redirect created by Yarl, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)