an active user on Wikidata for now several years (where I tot up around 250.000 contribs), I've focused on basic tasks such as creating items (and merging duplicates), adding statements and descriptions and bringing references; I also enjoy participating on property proposals. I became a regular reader of the project chat and now try to keep an eye on the community's issues, expectations projects; hence I would like to involve myself a bit more, and be more helpful. I would use the sysop tools mainly to delete/undelete RfDed items, and fight vandalism by SPing targeted items and blocking vandals (IMHO, one more sysop out the current 55 ones wouldn't be too much to protect our 76.000.000 items...); of course I would also make a relevant use of other tools for the occasion. Thank you all, Nomen ad hoc (talk) 14:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Candidate was blocked in 2018 for making personal attacks
Add on the fact that the candidate has just come back from a wiki-break, I would want to see another year of careful and less antagonistic participation in Wikimedia projects before endorsing him as an administrator. Deryck Chan (talk) 17:14, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per Deryck. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 17:16, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Deryck and discussion, sorry --Frettie (talk) 17:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Neutral I feel like I have had good interactions with Nomen ad hoc here recently, but I do have a vague memory of some drama from a couple of years back. I think I would support more strongly if you try again in a year or two. ArthurPSmith (talk) 20:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per Deryck. Mahir256 (talk) 20:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
According to your talk page, you're on Wikibreak. Why request adminship if you're on a break? What languages do you understand? Can you please update user:Nomen ad hoc? Multichill (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Done! I forgot that (I'm indeed no more on break), so thank you for pointing it. Best, Nomen ad hoc (talk) 16:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC).
You have received a one week block for a privacy violation a couple of years ago. My impression is that this block is related to a latent long-term conflict that is still not really resolved, and some of your activity in this case looks concerning to me. How do you think about this case? Could you stay away from the other editor, both in editor and potential admin role? —MisterSynergy (talk) 23:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi. I regret this behaviour, have paid for that, and am now extremely careful of BLP policy. I consider this conflict as resolved, as the other party no more tried to interact with me. And of course, as a potential sysop, I would never ever be judge and jury. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 09:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC).
The user has also been blocked multiple times on French Wikipedia for "attaques personnelles ou insultes" (english: personal attacks or insults). Not mention this in your introduction, makes it look like you trying to hide it. - Premeditated (talk) 20:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Why does it make . I'm not trying to hide anything; it's just unrelated with Wikidata as said below. But to elaborate a bit: I was young and impulsive, but I've matured and focused on constructive and friendly interactions on the projects; regarding the specific case of WP, I also got some distance from WP, hence I also would like to involve more myself on WD community activity. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 09:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC).
@Deryck Chan: FYI. Also, I wasn't on wikibreak before opening this request; I just forgot to update my talkpage. As said, I got involved carefully in Wikidata from several months. Best, Nomen ad hoc (talk) 09:35, 14 February 2020 (UTC).
Comment <name> is one of the more active and productive French language contributors to Wikidata. I'm not really aware of the frwiki business mentioned above and I don't think he was on a wikibreak recently. @ChristianKl, Frettie: where do you get this from? Sounds a bit like import from drama elsewhere. --- Jura 17:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
I agree with Jura on this one. Ayack (talk) 18:24, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
For me it's a combination of the provided data by Deryck and MisterSynergy along with a more fuzzy intuitive sense that comes up when I read the name based on past interactions. I haven't spent the time to review his participation. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 19:06, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments, Ayack and Jura. I also agree with you. I regret Christian's mind and don't really what motivates this feeling. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 09:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC).
@Rzuwig: could you consider some elaboration? Just voting oppose doesn't help me to bring a response. Best, Nomen ad hoc (talk) 09:35, 14 February 2020 (UTC).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.