User talk:Ayack

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Ayack/Archive 1 on 2016-08-02.

Ghuron (talkcontribs)

I can see in en:Louis de Montfort the following statement: "In November 1700 he joined the Third Order of the Dominicans" with reference to a book. Is there any specific reason why do you think that my edit was wrong?

Ayack (talkcontribs)
Soundwaweserb (talkcontribs)

Why you revert my edit? What are doing?

2409:4061:2E8C:F556:0:0:16CB:4D03 (talkcontribs)

Aruna. Chalpradesh

Reply to "Louis de Montfort"
Nomen ad hoc (talkcontribs)

Salut Ayack ! Pourrais-tu STP m'indiquer si cette déclaration est correcte ? Et la fête(P841) correspond au 8 mai, dans le cas de ce "collectif" de béatifiés, c'est bien ça ? Bien à toi

Nomen ad hoc (talkcontribs)

(Au passage, si tu as des idées pour combler les lacunes de Wikidata concernant les religieux et prêtres français, n'hésite pas. J'aimerais m'y mettre - par exemple j'ai référencé quelques abbés aujourd'hui - mais je ne sais pas trop ce qui pourrait être fait faute d'une vision d'ensemble.)

Ayack (talkcontribs)

Salut @Nomen ad hoc, feast day (P841) s'emploie comme déclaration à part entière, pas comme qualificatif (elle ne change pas en fonction de l'étape de canonisation).

Sinon, concernant les prêtres et religieux, la difficulté est de trouver une source "centralisée". J'ai travaillé (un tout petit peu) sur des pères abbés aussi, et il faut vraiment aller à la pêche aux informations. Rien que sur les ordres religieux et abbayes, couvents, etc. en France, il y a un gros travail à mener.

Nomen ad hoc (talkcontribs)
Ayack (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Une déclaration"
Peter17 (talkcontribs)

Bonjour Ayack,

J'ai une question concernant ce diff : : il semble qu'à la suite de cette modification, la requête ne prenne plus en compte les églises dont la localisation administrative est Saint Martin (French part) (Q126125) mais seulement celles dont la localisation administrative est une commune de Saint-Martin. Or, depuis 2007, Saint-Martin n'a plus de commune (cf. fr:Saint-Martin (Antilles_françaises)#Statut_et_représentation)...

Peut-on annuler la modification et revenir à la requête précédente ?

Merci et bonne continuation !

2409:4061:2E8C:F556:0:0:16CB:4D03 (talkcontribs)

Aruna. Chalpradesh

Reply to "Églises de Saint-Martin"
Сидик из ПТУ (talkcontribs)

Hello! Please explain to me how a football stadium is different from a rugby one? I believe that the difference is the same as between a men's football stadium and a women's football stadium, that is, it is not significant.

Сидик из ПТУ (talkcontribs)
Ayack (talkcontribs)
Сидик из ПТУ (talkcontribs)

There are two types of football stadiums: with athletic tracks (like Stade de France (Q13205)) and without them (like Wembley Stadium (Q128468)). We can play association football (Q2736), rugby union (Q5849), rugby league (Q10962), women's association football (Q606060), women's rugby league (Q3452887), Women's rugby union (Q3452920) at every of them. It may even be difficult to find a football stadium where rugby has never been played and vice versa. So categories should be named like Stadiums where rugby has ever been played but it's bad idea for main classification of Wikidata item. Moreover, it should be stated in sport (P641) field. We also have special categories such as Category:Association football players (Q7217464) or Category:Rugby footballers (Q7042506) but we do not use instance of (P31) for association football player (Q937857) or rugby player (Q13415036). And for Category:Rugby union stadiums (Q23365958) we can use category combines topics (P971) (stadium type + sport played)

Ayack (talkcontribs)

I understand you point of view but I'm not fully convinced by your arguments (and to be honest football and rugby are not my favorite areas). Lets continue this discussion on Wikidata talk:WikiProject Association football where we could have more opinions.

Сидик из ПТУ (talkcontribs)

Ok, I will write there

Ayack (talkcontribs)

I've already posted a message. Feel free to amend it.

2409:4061:2E8C:F556:0:0:16CB:4D03 (talkcontribs)

Aruna. Chalpradesh

Reply to "{{Q|15303456}} = {{Q|1154710}}"
Verbex (talkcontribs)

Was no aerospace engineer, but an aeronautical engineer.


Ayack (talkcontribs)

Maybe, but for sure he wasn't a "list of aerospace engineering schools"

Verbex (talkcontribs)

Both are wrong, then. Wikidata's robot replaces 'aeronautical engineer' by the list item, hence the entry.

Reply to "Béchereau"
Thibaut120094 (talkcontribs)


Regarding this, just a reminder:

Per WD:ROLLBACK, you’re not supposed to use rollback "to undo good-faith contributions that were not test edits or vandalism."


Reply to "Rollback"
Koreller (talkcontribs)
Ayack (talkcontribs)


Pas de problème, en revanche, on ne met pas d'indications entre parenthèses dans les libellés. Les "ancien", "détruit", ou autres sont à mettre en description.

Koreller (talkcontribs)

Okay, ça marche je ferais attention à l'avenir

Reply to "Erreur de ma part"

Wikidata property for an identifier : Property:P640

WKPDA3 (talkcontribs)

Hi Ayack, P640 property no longer works. The url seems to have changed :

Old :$1

New :$1

Can you fix this bug? We need to change all the identifiers for each element ?

Thanks for your feedback :)

Ayack (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Wikidata property for an identifier : Property:P640"

Call for participation in the interview study with Wikidata editors

Kholoudsaa (talkcontribs)

Dear Ayack,

I hope you are doing good,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at King’s College London, and I work on a project as part of my PhD research that develops a personalized recommendation system to suggest Wikidata items for the editors based on their interests and preferences. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.

I would love to talk with you to know about your current ways to choose the items you work on in Wikidata and understand the factors that might influence such a decision. Your cooperation will give us valuable insights into building a recommender system that can help improve your editing experience.  

Participation is completely voluntary. You have the option to withdraw at any time. Your data will be processed under the terms of UK data protection law (including the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018). The information and data that you provide will remain confidential; it will only be stored on the password-protected computer of the researchers. We will use the results anonymized (?) to provide insights into the practices of the editors in item selection processes for editing and publish the results of the study to a research venue. If you decide to take part, we will ask you to sign a consent form, and you will be given a copy of this consent form to keep.

If you’re interested in participating and have 15-20 minutes to chat (I promise to keep the time!), please either contact me at or use this form with your choice of the times that work for you.

I’ll follow up with you to figure out what method is the best way for us to connect.

Please contact me using the email mentioned above if you have any questions or require more information about this project.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.



Reply to "Call for participation in the interview study with Wikidata editors"
Labdajiwa (talkcontribs)

Hello, I see you are protecting Muhammad (Q9458). Please review my edit request on the talk page. Thanks.

Reply to "Q9458"