Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2017/01/25

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q7681716

Q7681716: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Enwiki page delete - not sure which one this is about
--- Jura 15:46, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q24935611

Q24935611: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Blank, the only Wikipedia article is now a service page waiting for importing on Italian language Wikivoyage (under Gallipoli (Italia) article). --Gce (talk) 17:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q3958378

Q3958378: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Blank Gce (talk) 18:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q5954235

weighted voting (Q5954235): electoral or law making voting system: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Enlazar a Q2065430 Farisori » 21:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

 Done Redirect created by User:HakanIST --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q27572080

Q27572080: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not linked to specified term Wargo (talk) 21:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q28494433

Q28494433: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty. NatigKrolik (contributions • talk) 22:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q28498150

Q28498150: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty. NatigKrolik (contributions • talk) 22:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q28502340

Q28502340: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty. NatigKrolik (contributions • talk) 22:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q28492334

Q28492334: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Vandalism. NatigKrolik (contributions • talk) 22:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q28492252

Q28492252: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Vandalism. NatigKrolik (contributions • talk) 22:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q28492106

Q28492106: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty. NatigKrolik (contributions • talk) 22:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q28485857

Q28485857: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty. NatigKrolik (contributions • talk) 22:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q28519854

Treaty of Versailles (Q28519854): most important of the peace treaties of the First World War which ended the state of war between Germany and the Allied Powers: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of another item MechQuester (talk) 07:53, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

The Treaty in Russian can be edition item of Treaty of Versailles (Q8736). —Wylve (talk) 07:57, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Oh I guess it was added after I requested. MechQuester (talk) 08:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

I will tag this as  Not done + merged. MechQuester (talk) 08:11, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

 Done Redirect created by User:MechQuester --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request

Pages deleted on itWiki or never existed on any project. No other links or crossed links between pages contained in this proposal only НУРшЯGIO^{(beware of the moose)} 06:17, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Some of the items seem notable, as they have external ID's or are about known iPod types. The latter I have some doubts about. Perhaps someone else can have a second look. Lymantria (talk) 06:57, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

I would definitely keep Q21587629 and Q11893302 since they appear in notable films (and I've now added some backlinks and more IDs). I think the iPod items should be notable enough (the models are clearly relevant to Wikipedia, given the tables on pages like en:IPod Classic#Models and en:List of iPod models). The items don't have much info right now and ideally someone who knows/cares more about Apple products would improve them but I don't think we need to delete them, it seems clear enough what they are. - Nikki (talk) 12:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

 Done Those not deleted are sufficiently notable. Lymantria (talk) 09:17, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request 4

non notable item GZWDer (talk) 08:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by יונה בנדלאק (talk • contribs • logs) and myself. Lymantria (talk) 09:16, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q25600721

Amiiformes (Q25600721): order of fishes: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty - was a duplicate on ky.wp Chaoborus (talk) 12:16, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

 Done Redirect created by User:HakanIST --DeltaBot (talk) 13:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q28520149

Q28520149: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty, was Mahilioŭ Division under the Belarusian Railway (Q21029778) --Fractaler (talk) 09:11, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by יונה בנדלאק (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:20, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request

1. Q28152154 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q28170267 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Empty items. FShbib (talk) 10:32, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

1. Q28515230 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q28515238 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q28515250 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q28515258 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q28515268 (delete | history | links | logs)
6. Q28515278 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Special pages items and not meet the notability policy. Please read this request for more info. FShbib (talk) 10:32, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by יונה בנדלאק (talk • contribs • logs) - yona b (talk) 15:28, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q28424452

Q28424452: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted elsewhere Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:58, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:10, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q18676643

老子道徳経 (Q18676643): Japanese Daodejing translation: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merged into Q134425 C933103 (talk) 08:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Seems  Keep to me. @C933103: I don't understand, 老子道徳経 (Q18676643) and Tao Te Ching (Q134425) are two different concept and we need two different items. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 11:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: 老子道徳経 (Q18676643)'s description say it is for the Japanese translation of Tao Te Ching (Q134425), however the only item in it before I edit, was s:ja:老子道徳経, which is untranslated classical Chinese version of Tao Te Ching (Q134425). Thus I moved the entry into Tao Te Ching (Q134425) and cannot see why 老子道徳経 (Q18676643) should remain. Therefore I submitted this deletion request.C933103 (talk) 11:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

I see now, definitely  Keep. Sorry but you can't mix a work and it's editions. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 11:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: But the problem is that, it claim to be a kanbun (Q7901319) version of Tao Te Ching (Q134425). However, the language of the text printed in the s:ja:老子道徳経 page is actually Classical Chinese (Q37041), which mean it have not been translated to kanbun (Q7901319) yet. Therefore, it is not a version of Tao Te Ching (Q134425), but instead just another copy of original version being hosted on Japanese wikisource. Actually, as a version, it is same as s:zh:老子 (匯校版) (Laozi (Huixiao bian) (Q17342659)). Now, Laozi (Huixiao bian) (Q17342659) is a version of Tao Te Ching (Q134425), which according to its talk page, is the most widely circulated version of Tao Te Ching (Q134425) extracted from s:zh:道德經 (王弼本), which in turn is what s:en:Translation:Tao_Te_Ching, and all the four versions of French translation linked from Tao Te Ching (Q134425) based on.C933103 (talk) 12:35, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

@C933103: oh ok, so there is an other and different problem. I'm a bit unsure now but I think the solution is to ask the deletion of both s:ja:老子道徳経 first (should be easy if you're right and indeed, it seems to be the case so I've ask for deletion on s:ja:Wikisource:削除依頼) and Q18676643 (and no merging is involve here). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

but Classical Chinese is considered as an element of Japanese in Japan. I see w:Nihon Shoki only exist in Chinese wikisource so some editors might have agreed on not doing so, but there are still tons of other Classical Chinese text being stored on Japanese wikisource.C933103 (talk) 13:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

@C933103: isn't Classical Chinese considered as an element of Japanese culture more than an element of Japanese language? Either way, I suggest we wait until a sysop answers on ja.ws to see how to deal with it here. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 15:23, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

It is an element of Japanese culture but also an element of Japanese language. I have read a report that said, in regular Japanese language lesson in Japanese high school classes, more than one third of those hours are being spent on teaching how to read those annotated kanbun,(translating classical chinese into classical japanese via annotation), and university entry exam in Japan also always include them as part of the reading comprehension questions.C933103 (talk) 00:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

ah and yes, the guideline linked by the user over there does have explicitly mentioned kanbun(classical chinese) sources are not restricted by the restriction of "no foreign language material allowed". C933103 (talk) 00:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

If these are the same, they can be merged, if not, they should stay separate. Either way, neither item needs to be deleted, so I'm marking this as  Not done. If you want to continue to discuss whether or it should be merged, please find a more appropriate place, e.g. the item's talk page or project chat if you need more opinions. - Nikki (talk) 16:17, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q25395058

Q25395058: Wikimedia list article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wrong name Fiver, der Hellseher (talk) 16:06, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

 Not done No need to delete an item because the label is wrong. I've merged the new item into this and fixed the label. - Nikki (talk) 16:12, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Ok. --Fiver, der Hellseher (talk) 16:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q27663636

Q27663636: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Article on enWP deleted as promotional Randykitty (talk) 15:36, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

OK. Thanks, but Randykitty, why was I informed about it? Ldorfman (talk) 15:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by Nikki (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:21, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

deleted, more users support deletion, and their arguments are more clear.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

---

Q28125710

Q28125710: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I doubt a database field is notable enough to have an item. There is no structural need for this. For some background information please see Property_talk:P1629#Proposal_to_stretch_definition. --Succu (talk) 17:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Keep A pointy nomination of something that clearly meets our notability policy, has a structural purpose, and is used. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Probably you can explain „clearly meets our notability polic“ further and the structural need it fullfills. Of course it is used once to show us your understanding of the agreement reached at Property_talk:P1629#Proposal_to_stretch_definition. --Succu (talk) 18:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

 Delete Clearly no structural need, as Panarctic Flora (Q28064236) is sufficient to fulfil the structural purpose, see here. Does hence not fulfil notability criteria. Lymantria (talk) 09:14, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

That discussion explicitly allowed for items for identifiers. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Allowed, not needed. Hence no structural need. Lymantria (talk) 19:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Looks like we need some more opinions: @Thierry Caro, ArthurPSmith, Azertus, Paperoastro, Liné1, Brya:. --Succu (talk) 19:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC

This is actually the opposite from meeting a structural need; it is a structural hindrance. If Commons is going to have a template to link to databases, this item is going to prevent the link to Panarctic Flora from working. - Brya (talk) 19:11, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ Byra's indentation is once again - presumably intentionally - broken. Their assertion is pure FUD. This item, or its use, won't stop anything from working. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Mr. Mabbett your FUD means fear, uncertainty and doubt (Q831648)? --Succu (talk) 22:25, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

I am sorry to see user:Pigsonthewing write that he does not understand how templates work, but it is fairly basic. If a template is going to call up the databases for which an identifier is provided, it will go to the property; all properties consistently link directly to the respective database, except, if user:Pigsonthewing gets his way, this database (as it will not link to the database, but to this special item). - Brya (talk) 03:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ Brya's indentation is again - presumably deliberately - broken. Their claim "to see user:Pigsonthewing write that he does not understand how templates work" is a bare-faced lie, as is the claim "all properties consistently link directly to the respective database, except... this database". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:23, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

 Delete the ID has no sitelinks or other reason for existence, it merely acts to insert itself between the ID property and its database. An admin might want to note some of the above users have been edit warring about this on the property itself Panarctic Flora ID (P2434) ArthurPSmith (talk) 21:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Please, some admin, take a decision. This request did not have new input for more than a week, 9 days actually, and the edit war continues. Lymantria (talk) 18:22, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

 Deleted by Ymblanter (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q28526251

Q28526251: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of Q5636097 TheRandomIP (talk) 17:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by Ymblanter (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Q28527373

Q28527373: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Meaningless item. —Wylve (talk) 20:16, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

 Deleted by YMS (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)