Somehow it still got archived at Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2019/09/20#Q7793623,_Q54579516,_Q54579564
User talk:יונה בנדלאק
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Reply to "Undeletion"
Reply to "השחתה ב Q3874799"
Reply to "Q15628586"
Reply to "רק לידיעתך"
About this board
Welcome to Wikidata, יונה בנדלאק!
Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:
- Introduction – An introduction to the project.
- Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
- Community portal – The portal for community members.
- Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
- Project chat – Discussions about the project.
If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.
Previous discussion was archived aton 2016-02-25.
@Jura1I undelete them, do you really think we need items for each of them and for them together?
If we have an item for a duo, I try to create separate items for each individual in a fairly systematic way. Monitoring page is at Wikidata:WikiProject Q5/lists/duos. People try to add statements about one or the other individual on the item for the duo where they don't make much sense.
Not sure about the combined one, it came that way from Wikipedia. The reference I add treats both too.
Anyways, we could still have the deletion discussion.
השחתה ב Q3874799
היי, אם עדיף לעשות את זה במקום אחר אשמח אם תיידע אותי.
אנונימי השחית פעמיים את הפריט, הוא החליף את החתימה של נשיא אוקראינה בתמונה של פוליטיקאית אמריקאית חסרת קשר ושינה את תאריך ההשבעה שלו ל-2045. יש דרך לחסום או משהו?
שלום רב, כמו בוויקיפדיה גם כאן יש אפשרות להגן על הערך או לחסום את המשתמש.
לאור העובדה שזה קרה פעם אחת והוא לא עשה את זה שוב לאחר מכן, כרגע אין טעם לא להגן על הפריט ולא לחסום.
המקום לבקשות כאלו הוא ב־Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard.
המשך יום טוב
I am not sure you are right. but any way I restore it
I think the policy is pretty clear: “1. It contains at least one valid sitelink to a page on Wikipedia, Wikivoyage, Wikisource, Wikiquote, Wikinews, Wikibooks, Wikidata, Wikispecies, Wikiversity, or Wikimedia Commons.” None of the exceptions apply for these templates.
זה לא הוא זו היא.
ואני יודע, היא גם השחיתה את דף המשתמש שלי בויקיפדיה העברית.
שלום יונה. ראה User_talk:בורה_בורה#עליזה_בלוך
אם נמחק ערך מוויקי העברית, והוא היחיד שמקושר לפריט, מה עושים עם הפריט? תייג אותי כשאתה עונה, כי אני לא תמיד מבקר בוויקידאטא
Can you create the article en:Bodies of water of Azerbaijan in Hebrew?
Can you also create the article en:List of rivers of Azerbaijan in Hebrew?
In hebrew wikipedia, the community don't like "list article" (or list of list) without any other data. in this case if almost all the article in he list will be red (i didn't check, but in all the film list I am pretty sure this is the situation now) this article will be remove.
Quick Translation Request
we agree about the translation
I see you speak Hebrew.
I wanted to ask how to say "village in Indonesia" and "commune in Morocco". Thank you in advance.
"village in Indonesia" - כפר באינדונזיה (kfar beIndonesia)
"commune in Morocco" - עיר במרוקו (Ir beMarocco)
I translate commune to city because this is the work we use. In Hebrew commune have the same meaning like the English word and it is not in use when we speak on cities or any human settlement.
so commune in meaning is basically same in English and Hebrew. In that case, what about "settlement in Morocco" thought? I think that make sense for Q17318027
yes. it is probably better: יישובים במרוקו
According to Talk:Q3568049, you speedily deleted them. The reason given was "not exist", but these actually did exist. It's just that they eventually ceased to do so, similar to the Klingon Wikipedia.
If people still think these should be deleted, we can have a proper discussion before.
I don't see why we need those item when the webs are not working. we can still discuss about it.
I agree that it can be discussed. Would you undo the speedy deletion so we can have a proper discussion?
If you think those "redirects" are also notable, then please please and please create dummy items for:
- https://nb.wikipedia.org, which is a redirect to Norwegian Wikipedia (Q191769);
- https://nb.wiktionary.org, which is a redirect to Norwegian (Bokmål) Wiktionary (Q33109122);
- https://nb.wikibooks.org, which is a redirect to Norwegian (Bokmål) Wikibooks (Q33109508);
- https://nb.wikinews.org, which is a redirect to Norwegian Wikinews (Q21281277);
- https://nb.wikiquote.org, which is a redirect to Norwegian (Bokmål) Wikiquote (Q33109782);
- https://nb.wikisource.org, which is a redirect to Norwegian Wikisource (Q24577682);
- ... as well as all redirects that you can find at phab:source/operations-puppet/browse/production/modules/mediawiki/files/apache/sites/redirects.conf and phab:source/operations-puppet/browse/production/modules/mediawiki/files/apache/sites/redirects/redirects.dat
The question is do we really need it for the discussion. The data there is not more that the project, languish and link.
Can you explain based on which policy and what motif you deleted it?
someone ask to delete them (probably @Liuxinyu970226:). i check the gerrit (and maybe phab) link he provide and decide that it can be deleted. like a lot of request in the request for delete page.
I delete it in Jan-14. if it was after 17, when the discussion was develop, i probably was not delete it. I still don't understand why you need undelete to discuss about it. after the discussion we will do what ever will be decided, undelete or leave it deleted.
As an administrator, you can't delete random items. You should attempt to base your decision on the applicable policy.
If I list deleted items on Wikidata:Requests for deletion, they get archived.
Here it seems they would simply need to be undeleted as policy wasn't followed.
Huh? Have you asked @MarcoAurelio:, the Assignee of that Phabricator task before dropping your so-called "good input" here?
How's this related to me? I've deleted nix here :)
An item about a web page that is not exist cannot be delete by Notability policy.
In the delete log i write the cause: don't exist by phab:T169450
Where do you prefer the deletion/undeletion discussion to take place?
However, in your this case, the problem with your statements here are more complex, more beyond, and more confused than the simply undeletion actions, I would not aganist opening a RFC for your >1km high thread propose.
I'm actually interested in a response from the user of this talk page, not MarcoAurelio. As it's generally thought that one should contact the person first.
@Jura1 I still don't get why I am being mentioned here. I have not deleted any item here. Thanks.
Well, the original reason that I pinged you is because of those patches that deleted projects and redirected domains, but as you explained, there's nothing related to you anymore, best wishes.
I have troubles following Lixinyu's reasoning as well, but I thought it was just me.
If you look through the site links of pentene (Q151353), you can see that zh and es use a "disambiguation"-like template to indicate that the page is a chemical set index, but the text of both indices clearly that the topic area is "organic compounds with 5 carbon atoms, 10 hydrogen atoms, and 1 double bond", not "different things called 'penteno' / '戊烯'". Since there is no overlap of site links, I believe this is a valid merge of two items covering the same topic.
not sure ig you are right. any way someone else change it back.