Wikidata:Property proposal/Bursa Malaysia stock code

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Bursa Malaysia stock code[edit]

Return to Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control

   Under discussion
Descriptionstock code on Bursa Malaysia  
Data typeExternal identifier
Domaincompany (Q783794)
Allowed valuesdigits
Example 1Media Prima (Q6805531)4502
Example 2Telekom Malaysia (Q1640639)4863
Example 3Tenaga Nasional (Q1584297)5347
Example 4RHB Bank (Q4207443)1066
Sourcehttp://www.bursamalaysia.com/
Expected completenesseventually complete (Q21873974)
Formatter URLhttp://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/list-of-companies/plc-profile.html?stock_code=$1

Motivation[edit]

This property will help in linking a company to its stock report. — Jeluang Terluang (talk) 10:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support David (talk) 06:57, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment How is this different from using ticker symbol (P249) with qualifier stock exchange (P414) Bursa Malaysia (Q43335)? Mahir256 (talk) 22:33, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Mahir256. --Ysangkok (talk) 22:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Mahir256 --DannyS712 (talk) 00:42, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Some differences are: (1) we could provide a formatter URL with a direct link to the info provided by the actual exchange it is listed on, and that this wouldn't be hidden in the references; (2) we could set up a mix'n'match set that directly sets the values in wikidata; (3) we could more easily set up property constraints that relate to the country it is listed in; (4) we could set up third-party formatter URLs for other webpages that also have info on the companies listed on a particular stock exchange. I realise this is not how we have done previous ticker symbols, so it may be better discussed in a RFC, but in my opinion, our properties for businesses are underdeveloped, so I support these IDs. --99of9 (talk) 01:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
    @99of9: I understand your point, but think that an RfC would probably be better. Since even New York Stock Exchange (Q13677) doesn't have a property for itself (stock code on the New York Stock Exchange) there doesn't seem to be precedent for this. --DannyS712 (talk) 02:26, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The property provides a link to the stock exchange that trades a stock of the company. That's useful information for people who are interested in the company. Traditionally, I think we didn't make decisions like this by having an RfC beforehand. ChristianKl❫ 10:27, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Kopiersperre Jklamo ArthurPSmith S.K. Givegivetake fnielsen rjlabs ChristianKl Vladimir Alexiev User:Pintoch Parikan User:Cardinha00 User:zuphilip MB-one User:Simonmarch User:Jneubert Mathieudu68 User:Kippelboy User:Datawiki30 User:PKM User:RollTide882071 Kristbaum Andber08 Sidpark SilentSpike Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas)


Pictogram voting comment.svg Notified participants of WikiProject Companies to get interested people a opportunity to comment. ChristianKl❫ 10:31, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per 99of9 --MB-one (talk) 13:13, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think this is ok - they don't use a "symbol" they use an integer number, and presumably (unlike say the NYSE) those numbers would not be re-used over time, so it's a real identifier rather than just a traditional ticker symbol. ArthurPSmith (talk) 14:24, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Note that, in a case of creation, there may be 200+ possible new properties. I will ping Wikidata:Project chat as well.Jklamo (talk) 15:06, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reasonable. But preferably usage as qualifier of stock exchange (P414), not as a standalone property. --Jklamo (talk) 15:11, 13 August 2019 (UTC)