User talk:Yerpo

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Wikidata, Yerpo!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! Wikidata is a free knowledge base that can be read and edited by humans and machines alike, and you can help. Go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familarise yourself with:

If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

--Emijrp (talk) 14:25, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


Hej, tole gre pa lahko zelo hitro, če delata dva. :) Matjaž Zaplotnik (my contributions) 18:51, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Sam res :) Ko si se ravno oglasil, kje je funkcija za masovno dodajanje interwikijev? Saj bi sam poiskal, pa vidim, da si jo že odkril... Yerpo (talk) 18:52, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Ja, sem po naključju odkril, ko sem vohljal naokrog. Skripti se reče slurpInterwiki.js Gl. tole, je čist simple. Ko je gagdet inštaliran, imaš v stolpčku na levi ukaz pod Toolbars Import Interwikis. Matjaž Zaplotnik (my contributions) 18:58, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Ok, hvala. Ti za mesta še prepustim. Yerpo (talk) 18:59, 7 November 2012 (UTC)


Slovene Cultural Heritage Register ID (P1587) is ready. --Tobias1984 (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. — Yerpo Eh? 17:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

This one is ready too now: P1597 (P1597) -Tobias1984 (talk) 17:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Great, I'll go populating it. Thanks again. — Yerpo Eh? 18:54, 3 November 2014 (UTC)


Hi, looking at history pages, was there any reason to keep Denisa (Q16275371) and Denisa (Q18507664) separate? Matěj Suchánek (talk) 08:54, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

No, I think there wasn't really a reason, I must have confused something. Feel free to merge my new object into the old one. Thanks, — Yerpo Eh? 09:00, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Ok, → ← Merged. Thanks for the quick answer. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 09:20, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Slovene Cultural Heritage Register[edit]

Hi Yerpo, good job with Slovene Cultural Heritage Register ID (P1587) and all the sites! You might want to consider joining Wikidata:WikiProject Cultural heritage. Multichill (talk) 09:48, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. I added some info to the table, but the core problem is that the raw list is not publicly available for our country, so we're limited to manual queries in the registry's web interface. I've been adding info from the articles that are already written (and even not all of those are matched with official entries yet, far from it). — Yerpo Eh? 13:49, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Spodnja Sorica (Q2308939), Zgornja Sorica (Q2440027)[edit]

Hello, these two objects have same Slovene Cultural Heritage Register ID (P1587) = 12109. Probably this indicates an error. Could you help to resolve this issue? — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 20:15, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi, yeah, I saw it. This case is actually a conceptual problem - "Sorica" is a general toponym for a scattered alpine village that was recognized as culturally notable and entered in the Registry, but administratively, its two parts are considered separate settlements - the "Upper" and the "Lower Sorica". Because the articles in :slwiki were created following the administrative database, we have articles on both, with both comprising the same Registry entry. For this reason, I'd just leave this duplicated value for now until a better idea comes up. — Yerpo Eh? 21:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
"Sorica (Qxxxxxx)"
has part (P527)
Spodnja Sorica (Q2308939)
Zgornja Sorica (Q2440027)
Slovene Cultural Heritage Register ID (P1587): 12109
Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 21:35, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
A new object would be an option, yes, but then the :slwiki infoboxes for both parts will return a missing Slovene Cultural Heritage Register ID (P1587) error. Maybe I'll simply write a short stub tomorrow just to put the infobox there instead of in both parts separately. — Yerpo Eh? 21:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

RKD/ESD (Slovenia) ID (P1715)[edit]

The property you requested is now done. --Fralambert (talk) 04:56, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Arsen Dedić[edit]

Hehe... [1]. Bom popravil. --Romanm (talk) 19:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Enea revert[edit]

IIRC by the time I did this edit the number of female and male elements were almost equal (I checked this with SPARQL query). But now according to usage it is a male name, not a female! Check out this query:

select ?g (count(?g) as ?cnt)
  ?item wdt:P735 wd:Q16423333 ; wdt:P21/rdfs:label ?g filter(lang(?g) = "en")
group by ?g

Try it!

--Lockal (talk) 18:19, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Looks like you're right, it was nothing more than my limited imagination, apparently. I returned "unisex" for now, as in my country at least, it's used as a female name (a pretty recent fad, so not many notable women bear it yet). — Yerpo Eh? 18:41, 17 October 2016 (UTC)


In Tamil wikipedia we have concerned this list to conduct a contest. So we are going to make a big decision on contest rules. Contest is to expand up stubs. We don't know exactly,about how many bytes are equal to 10,000 characters. So we have now expanded some stubs. So we are expecting a change in the list. Can you please update the list Before 1st March. This would be helpful to us. Thank you.--Shriheeran (talk) 10:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

I can run the script for :tawiki only and copy the results on some subpage later today. Would that be enough for you? — Yerpo Eh? 11:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Sure, Thank you. Please do this--Shriheeran (talk) 14:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Can you able to create the list of stubs of ta wiki. As we focus on stubs. We have 690 stubs now and we would like to reduce that amount--Shriheeran (talk) 14:27, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
@Shriheeran: the list is on meta:User:Yerpo/tawiki sample 2017-02 temp. Cheers. — Yerpo Eh? 18:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks a lot--Shriheeran (talk) 15:27, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
In March, we had 690 stubs but now we have 689. What is the one missing, Can you find that and tell me Please?--Shriheeran (talk) 15:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
It's not easy for me to do that, but you can monitor page sizes yourselves. Just make a page somewhere at :tawiki and create this string for each of the 690 stubs in the list I made you earlier:
{{#expr:{{#invoke:String|replace|{{PAGESIZE:_title_}}|,}}*0.8 round 0}}
Where _title_ is the title of an article in :tawiki (for example மர்லின் மன்றோ). This will give you page sizes using the same method as for the list I maintain and if the value is above 10000, then it's not a stub. Actually, you will have to make two or more pages, because the system will not allow you to use more than 500 instances of PAGESIZE on the same page. See how we did this at :slwiki - sl:Wikipedija:WikiProjekt 1000 nujnih/Biografije (for biographies, there is a different page for each section). — Yerpo Eh? 17:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Can you create the list of stubs now--Shriheeran (talk) 01:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
The code will not work properly as it is showing more than 10,000 for the Article Sahara (சகாரா), and our weight is 0.9.--Shriheeran (talk) 04:04, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
You're right, I'm sorry, I forgot that this code will give very large values for articles in exotic scripts such as Tamil. But I cannot make a new list right now, so you can improvise: just use PAGESIZE on all stubs from before. Even if you will not get exact values, you will know that the one with the largest size is not a stub. — Yerpo Eh? 04:52, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Got it, Thank you--Shriheeran (talk) 06:04, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Is there are any tools, which makes easy to write articles. When we add the details then it should make sentences according to the data given. Is there plase tell me--Shriheeran (talk) 01:27, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

I'm afraid there is no such shortcut if you want to create meaningful content and increase the size above stub. But you can translate from English or any other language with the help of Content Translator. Several active users should be motivated to write real encyclopedic info about basic subjects for the sake of knowledge to maintain good growth, organizing a WikiProject has helped a lot for us in :slwiki. — Yerpo Eh? 04:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Ok, And Can you update The list, As I want to know that have our project did well, we have expanded 4 stubs now. So, I think the No. of Stubs Found in Tamil Wikipedia will decrease, and the update will help us to find the maximum bytes of a stub. Thank you and I found the missing article it was City, I was 27,000 bytes. Our project limit is to expand articles above 26,000. So, through your update I can check this. Hope you'll give a good reply--Shriheeran (talk) 06:55, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
The list will be updated on Friday or Saturday. — Yerpo Eh? 06:57, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Can you run this page just only for ta wiki or Update and give the copy of that in user namspace and In this is ta article is a stub or article?--Shriheeran (talk) 07:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC) The Tamil Wikipedia articles In these links are over than 26,000 bytes (The limit of stubs we think to expand through the contest), But these were in the list of stubs here > meta:User:Yerpo/tawiki sample 2017-02 temp. So my question is Is thse are stubs or articles Please reply me as sooon as possible because the contest we have planned has started now.--Shriheeran (talk) 08:43, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't have time for that now. Just wait a few days. — Yerpo Eh? 09:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
It's ok, Please ping me while replying and your replies are the turning points of the contest rules so please reply me as soon as possible. Thank you--Shriheeran (talk) 09:46, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
The Friday has come, Why don't you update the page.--Shriheeran (talk) 09:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
@Shriheeran: it will be updated in the afternoon (UTC), I'm at work now and don't have the access to my computer. — Yerpo Eh? 09:35, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you very much!--Shriheeran (talk) 09:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
I am waiting--Shriheeran (talk) 13:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
You are also beginning to be annoying. Please realize that I am a volunteer too and I do this in my free time, so pressuring me will not accomplish anything. You could've organized your competition around the usual date when the list is updated instead of trying to force others to change. I will post an update by the end of the afternoon as I promised (unless something unexpected happens IRL), but this is the last reply you will get about this issue. Understood? — Yerpo Eh? 13:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Extremely I am sorry, I didn't think my messages annoy you, Sorry. And I know we are volunteering. I thought the update will be in strat of the afternoon. It's Ok. All of this is because of my eagerness and impatience, Once again sorry and a Thanks for replying. I hope we'll bbuild up an mutual understanding with us. And Hope you'll help me a lot. Thank you and Sorry!-Shriheeran (talk) 14:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
@Shriheeran: it's updated (except for growth awards which I'll do later). — Yerpo Eh? 17:04, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks a lot!--Shriheeran (talk) 17:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
We have expanded 26 articles and every thing is perfect--Shriheeran (talk) 17:13, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
ta:புரதம் (Protein), This stub contains more than 12,000 characters which I counted through Online Character counter. But This should be taken as article. As we have expanded 26 stubs. The stub with minimum characters which contains 11,623, but the புரதம் is more than that. But it is less than the Byte size of article with 11,623 characters. Why is this? Can I get the explanation?--Shriheeran (talk) 05:29, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
@Shriheeran: as far as I see, :ta:புரதம் is counted as article, not as stub. — Yerpo Eh? 05:47, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
How is that? Can you show me the list of stubs?--Shriheeran (talk) 05:48, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
ta:ஹிப்போவின்_அகஸ்டீன் Is this a stub, but it is not expanded and it and புரதம் are in the list of stubs which you gave me in start of March--Shriheeran (talk) 05:50, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
ta:ஹிப்போவின் அகஸ்டீன் is a stub, yes, it's only two characters below 10.000. — Yerpo Eh? 06:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Ok, Thank you and Can I get a list of current stubs in Ta wiki. How to get that?--Shriheeran (talk) 06:01, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
As we are using the list that you gave, it is very necessary to know that which are stubs. If you wish, you can tell me how to run the script to crate the list of stubs.--Shriheeran (talk) 06:05, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Please, just a request not an irritation--Shriheeran (talk) 06:17, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

@Shriheeran: I've followed the instructions written by Yerpo in meta:Talk:List_of_Wikipedias_by_sample_of_articles#How many kilo bytes in Tamil equal 10000 characters?. Thanks to Yerpo, I've created the javascript (Gadget-edittools-size.js) file in Tamil Wikipedia with "language weight" of 0.9. --Drsrisenthil (talk) 06:14, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
I knew this already--Shriheeran (talk) 06:17, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
I put the latest score for tawiki on Google Docs, so you can download. The values there are raw character counts, so you have to multiply each by 0.9 to get the real result.
Of course you can also run the script yourself and get resuts that are more nicely formatted; it's published at meta:List of Wikipedias by sample of articles/Source code. It allows selecting only one language, but you'll have to change the code so it shows more than 100 stubs. First, you need to install Python 2.7.x on your computer (it won't work on 3.6.x), then Pywikibot and all the other modules that the script needs. Basic instructions are here, for other modules you will have to figure it out yourself - it depends on what system you have and I'm not able to provide tech support. — Yerpo Eh? 06:27, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

I am unabale to configure the pywikibot in Command prompt, Can I run this script in PAWS.--Shriheeran (talk) 10:08, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Every thing is great! We are running the script and checking our status for every 12 hrs, thanks--Shriheeran (talk) 13:30, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Oh, so you managed to set it up? Great. :) — Yerpo Eh? 13:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC)


I think there is some errors. We have expanded more than 200 articles in May. Even though we didn't go to top in the ranking, And also User:Aswn is running the script you gave everyday and here you can see that page.

The list created in meta
Wiki Language Weight Mean
(< 10k)
(> 30k)
Score Growth
48 ta தமிழ் 0.9 11,034 6,659 0 663 263 74 26.46 +0.00
The real list created in ta wiki through User:Aswn
Wiki Language Weight Mean
(< 10k)
(> 30k)
Score Growth
48 ta தமிழ் 0.9 12,628 10,548 0 474 447 79 33.03 [[User talk:Yerpo/Growth#ta தமிழ்|]]

--Shriheeran (talk) 08:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Please give s solution to this prob. Hope u reply--Shriheeran (talk) 09:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
I will check later today. In the future, please report issues at meta:Talk:List of Wikipedias by sample of articles so we keep it organized. — Yerpo Eh? 12:01, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
@Shriheeran: you were right, looks like the script had some glitch. I updated again now. — Yerpo Eh? 05:30, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you--Shriheeran (talk) 15:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


Hello, Yerpo. I'm working about the family name Gavioli and I met a voice in English about Izola, so that I gave a look to Wikidata: it seems to me that your Izola (Q15877) and Izola (Q12042076) regard the same town. Isn't it? If it's so, do you want to unify them?--Riccardo Fangarezzi (talk) 18:14, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Actually, one item is about the municipality and the other about the city, different administrative categories in Slovenia. If you look closely, several Wikipedias have different articles about both, so these two items couldn't be merged even if you tried. — Yerpo Eh? 18:17, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

CONOR.SI ID (P1280)[edit]

Ko si dal predlog za tole naj bi bilo za ljudi in organizacije, ampak slednje se je nekako izgubilo, na pogovorni strani je: "Domain According to this template: človek (Q5), organizations According to statements in the property: človek (Q5)"; Do tega sem prišel ob predlogu naj zbirko CONOR prenesejo na Mix'n'match. --Sporti (talk) 08:15, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Ja, organizacij je sicer v Conorju po občutku bolj za vzorec (vem samo za nekaj glasbenih skupin), ampak za kompletnost bi tudi morale biti v istem katalogu. Ne vidim, da bi bilo drugačno številčenje ali kakršnakoli druga razlika od vnosov za ljudi, da bi upravičilo nov property. Drugega kot "be bold" in spremenit Property talk:P1280 se ne spomnim. — Yerpo Eh? 12:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Tud kar nekaj podjetij in organizacij (muzejev, galerij, šol, knjižnic) je tam. Drugo je pa kako to popravit, instance of (P31) že lahko zamenjaš, samo potem bodo težave spodaj pri omejitvah, ki bi jih bilo tudi treba spremenit. Da vidimo, če bo kaj tukaj. --Sporti (talk) 13:19, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Ni druge kot dodat organization (Q43229) pod instance of in odstranit preverjanje rojstnih podatkov in spola. Lahko pogledaš na Property talk:P1587, kako se vnese več tipov objektov v constraint. Zdaj vidim, da je Laibach (Q325359) dodan kot izjema, da ne javlja napak, kar je res trapasta rešitev. — Yerpo Eh? 13:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Mislim, da je za zgled bolj primeren VIAF ID (P214). --Sporti (talk) 13:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
VIAF ID (P214) ima ogromno različnih vrst vnosov, od oseb in organizacij do zgradb, naselij, upravnih enot in umetniških del. Mislim, da CONOR pokriva samo osebe in organizacije, tako da je constraint na mestu. Ostalo je pa primerljivo, ja. — Yerpo Eh? 14:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
VIAF nima ometjive glede tipa, ker je toliko možnosti. Tudi tukaj ne moreš dal le ljudi in organizacij, ampak bi mora po moje našteti vse možnosti poleg ljudi (podjetja, g. skupine, šole, bolnice, muzeji, ...), tako da bi bilo po moje enostavneje odstraniti omejitev za instance of (P31), razen če se da nastavit, da gleda tudi podpomenke organizacij. --Sporti (talk) 13:25, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Mislim, da je kar privzeto, da organization (Q43229) zajema tudi vse podtipe preko relacije subclass of (P279). Jaz bi zato pustil, če bo recimo kdo po pomoti dodajal CONOR.SI ID (P1280) v Ljubljana National Drama Theatre (Q557229) namesto v Slovene National Theatre Drama Ljubljana (Q21034517) ali v Kidričevo (Q3503676) namesto v Municipality of Kidričevo (Q776770) (ja, tudi par občin ima identifikatorje, glej CONOR ID 288284771). — Yerpo Eh? 13:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
No sem dodal org., pa da vidimo. --Sporti (talk) 13:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Zaenkrat dela :) Mojih včerajšnjih dodatkov še ni zaznal, ampak problemov ne pričakujem. — Yerpo Eh? 12:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Ja tudi z MnM bo sčasoma večina povezanih. Najbolj enostaven je [2]. --Sporti (talk) 12:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Občine očitno vseeno ne spadajo pod organizacije (Wikidata:Database reports/Constraint violations/P1280#"Type človek (Q5), organizacija (Q43229)" violations). --Sporti (talk) 18:42, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Sem dodal zaenkrat administrative territorial entity (Q56061), če bomo našli še kak čisto tretji tip bo pa res bolje odstraniti constraint. — Yerpo Eh? 06:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Čudno, da daje Slovensko vojsko pod violations, čeprav spada pod organizije. --Sporti (talk) 17:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Res čudno, javlja kot da ni vnosa za instance of (P31), tako kot najprej, ko ga res ni bilo, dokler ga nisem dodal s tem urejanjem. Mogoče je kriv cache in ga bo zaznal za naslednjo posodobitev. — Yerpo Eh? 18:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Dodal sem še event (Q1656682), ki jih je tudi kar nekaj. --Sporti (talk) 09:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Po zadnji posodobitvi jih je še nekaj padlo izven, npr. zgradbe. --Sporti (talk) 10:11, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Hmnja, problem razločevanja med zgradbami in organizacijami, ki s temi zgradbami upravljajo. CONOR se v resnici nanaša na organizacijo, ki nastopa kot izdajatelj nekega dela v Cobissu (vsaj v večini primerov, ne vem pa, po kakšni logiki je not potem Maribor Synagogue (Q4281383)). Tega verjetno ne bomo nikoli dokončno razrešili, tako da bo očitno res najbolje, da se odstrani constraint. — Yerpo Eh? 10:29, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Zaenkrat PMM vseeno ni tako veliko odstopanj, čudno je pa, da npr. premogovnik, narodni park, pristanišče ali spa ne spadajo tudi pod podjetja oz. organizacije. --Sporti (talk) 10:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Urška Majdič[edit]


Odstranil sem njeno letnico rojstva, ker ni nikjer referencirana. A si dal nazaj? Imaš kak vir za ta podatek? Poleg tega mislim spremeniti, da je pisateljica, kar ni - je tekstopiska.  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by RockerSIM (talk • contribs) at 07:01, 24 May 2018‎ (UTC).

Zdravo. Letnica rojstva je v Cobissu - glej CONOR ID 42123363. Glede tekstopiske pa se strinjam. — Yerpo Eh? 07:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)



Can you create the article about the prominent economist en:Dani Rodrik in Slovene?

Thank you.

Sondrion (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Not really my area of interest, I'm afraid, but you can ask at sl:Wikipedija:Želeni članki. — Yerpo Eh? 16:25, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice. Unfortunately, because Wikipedia is banned and blocked in Turkey where I live, I cannot request it myself. If it is not impertinent of me, could you send my request to Slovene Wikipedia? If not, thank you anyway. Sondrion (talk) 17:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Sure, I added your request, but don't get high hopes - there's no regular user in the :slwiki community interested in economy on such level. — Yerpo Eh? 19:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Can you create en:Category:Wars involving Azerbaijan in Slovenian Wikipedia, just like sl:Kategorija:Vojne Armenije? The military histories of Azerbaijan and Armenia are linked. This is my last request for this year. Sondrion (talk) 21:14, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


Za Commons:Category:Assumption of Mary Parish Church (Brdo pri Lukovici) ne obstaja stran tukaj ali jo ne najdem? --Sporti (talk) 07:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Ne obstaja (še). Zaenkrat sem dal kompletno uvoziti podatke o spomenikih, ta je pa samo registrirana kulturna dediščina. — Yerpo Eh? 07:24, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Ok. Obstaja kar precej kategorij na zbirki, ki niso povezane sem. Samo za župnijske cerkve skoraj 200. --Sporti (talk) 07:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Ja? Sem mislil, da smo bili bolj vestni pri sprotnem vnašanju. Bi ti za vnašanje prišel prav kompleten seznam RKD vključno z registriranimi objekti, ki niso spomeniki? — Yerpo Eh? 07:45, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Zaenkrat sem spustil take brez že obstoječe strani tu, ki jih tudi ni bilo ravno veliko. Misliš tudi ostale dat uvozit? --Sporti (talk) 07:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Cerkve ipd. že, cele zbirke pa ne bi, ker je ogromno solate vmes. Že zdaj je ponekod problem s klasifikacijo, kjer sta recimo "grad XY" in "območje gradu XY" ločeno razglašena za spomenik. — Yerpo Eh? 08:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
OK potem nima smisla ročno vnašat. --Sporti (talk) 08:03, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Za sproti (za povezovanje kategorij ipd.) vseeno lahko, če ni veliko objektov - ker ne vem, kdaj se bom imel čas lotiti tega. Uvoz smo tako nastavili, da obstoječe objekte z EŠD samo dopolni. — Yerpo Eh? 08:05, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Ok bom videl koliko jih ostane na koncu. Kaj jim dam pod heritage designation (P1435)?. --Sporti (talk) 08:13, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
registered immobile cultural heritage of Slovenia (Q18519893); bolj razdelana navodila so na Wikidata:WikiProject_Slovenia/Properties#Cultural heritage. — Yerpo Eh? 08:39, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Kaj pa located in the administrative territorial entity (P131): je treba dati občino ali kraj (s katerim ni zadovoljen, pokaže se opozorilo). --Sporti (talk) 12:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Pod P131 gre občina. Kraj lahko vneseš pod location (P276). — Yerpo Eh? 13:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Kaj pa je s temi, ki imajo pod heritage designation (P1435) neznana vrednost (npr. Our Lady of Good Counsel Church (Q60351750))? --Sporti (talk) 16:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Ti so bili razglašeni pred 1981, ko še ni bilo ločitve med spomeniki državnega in lokalnega pomena. V RKD dejansko piše "neznana razglasitev". Sem pa razmišljal, da bi jim namesto tega raje dal preprosto cultural monument of Slovenia (Q12794452). — Yerpo Eh? 16:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Ja, ali to ali pa nov objekt zanje. --Sporti (talk) 07:42, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Merging items[edit]

Hallo Yerpo,
When you (want to) merge items, you may want to use the merge.js gadget from help page about merging. It helps with merging and removes the need to file a request on Wikidata:Requests for deletions.
With regards,- сyсn - (talkcontribslogs) 10:57, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi. I thought merging in this case was not necessary, because the object was simply emptied and had no meaningful content in the first place. — Yerpo Eh? 11:00, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

revert edit[edit]


why did you revert this edit:

? I didn't got your explanation ....  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by DD063520 (talk • contribs) at 12:00, 15 April 2020‎ (UTC).

Hi. The data was wrong - the newspaper is not published in Belgrade, it's just available there (as an import). Your addition also caused problems with automatic references that are extracted from Wikidata by infoboxes. They started displaying that Delo is only published in Belgrade. — Yerpo Eh? 12:33, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I’m a bit confused .... in the article there is written: “ . In addition to Slovenia, the paper is available in several Croatian cities and in Belgrade, Serbia”, so for me it is published in (geographical place of publication of the edition ): Slovenia, Croatian cities and Belgrad. I inserted it is published in Slovenia and Belgrad, which looks fine to me. If the info box is not able to handle double values we should keep the statements and put “published in Slovenia” as a statement with higher rank ....  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by DD063520 (talk • contribs) at 07:28, 16 April 2020‎ (UTC).

Like I said, the newspaper Delo does not have a special edition published in Belgrade. You misunderstood the article. Here are all the editions of Delo, and for the main newspaper, there is only one - published in Ljubljana. I inserted this info in Q3487776 now. — Yerpo Eh? 07:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi! Maybe we understand differently the property place of publication (P291). For me it means all places where the newspaper is available/sold/distributed .... you are more meaning the "name of the city where the publisher is located". Right? BTW I think your understanding is the right one .....  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by DD063520 (talk • contribs) at 11:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC).

I'm pretty sure place of publication is something completely different than distribution, yes. It is standard bibliographical practice to list the publisher's location, not hundreds of cities and towns where a newspaper is sold. — Yerpo Eh? 11:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)


Nekaj časa se že ukvarjam s slovenskimi naselji, sedaj sem pa predlagal novo avtoritetno povezavo: maPZS_trails/locations_ID
Če se ti data pogledat in dodat kakšen predlog, bo super. --Miha Peče Miha Peče (pogovor) 5:47, 20 July 2021 UTC]