Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2017/09/25

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q21397825: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted on Wikispecies: [1]. Thanks, Korg (talk) 19:40, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Eurodyne (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Mystic (Q31812518): village in Connecticut, United States: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Same as (Q585623) DDupard (talk) 10:01, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:10, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Redirect created by Lymantria, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Q40848109: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable organization Bodhisattwa (talk) 18:40, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Lymantria (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Q40855042: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable organization Bodhisattwa (talk) 19:21, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by Lymantria (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Q40885340: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item Рассилон (talk) 07:58, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

✓ Deleted by MisterSynergy (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:20, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Diana Mironova (Q40766279): Russian billiards player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Such element had already existed — Voltmetro (talk) 19:34, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Redirect created by Matěj Suchánek, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Moose Town Singers (Q35986646): first-nation Canadian traditional music ensemble: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

It is "highly doubtable" that this happened, apparently.

Does not meet the notability policy per previous discussion. I have restored this item. Item's creator has an objection to how discussion closed. I'm expecting them to provide relevant input to question of notability. -- Hakan·IST 11:15, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

The current references on statements don't support the given claims (I can only check the news article, the other site is not working). The band was also listed as "participant" of Wikimania 2017. It is highly doubtable if you could see them as that. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 18:28, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Like said the first time, I can see the existence, but I don't see why is notable. Maybe it's necessary add more info? --ValterVB (talk) 18:58, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
I don't see notability either. Only working source is a regional news website for one ethnicity of indians. That's not a heavy weight source. Mbch331 (talk) 19:23, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
The request isn't because the site is brocken but because it isn't notable. --ValterVB (talk) 21:08, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
@ValterVB: I don't understand this, they refer to real bands. We can have local collectives without own albums and any new songs. Majority of "folk" collectives are like this. d1g (talk) 21:36, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
@ValterVB: *Keep I agree. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ogoorcs (talk • contribs).
Reasons to ping me? --ValterVB (talk) 19:47, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
  • @D1gggg: Check Wikidata:Notability on what makes the subject of an item notable. At first glance one might think of criterion 2, because of the Quora and MusicBrainz identifiers. But these are linking to empty pages. Therefore I cannot see any relevant notability. I will delete the item. Lymantria (talk) 05:52, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
@Lymantria: MusicBrainz page is not empty - it is missing albums and tracks. MusicBrainz identifier is correct one. d1g (talk) 05:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
@D1gggg: The MusucBrainz page is not giving any information apart from links to Quora and Facebook. But I forgot to take the source into account. My apologies: restored the page. Lymantria (talk) 05:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Please note that the MusicBrainz page is created by Pigsonthewing himself. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Another confirmation that freely editable sites are not sufficient for notability. --ValterVB (talk) 08:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
http://anishinabeknews.ca has nothing to do with editable sites. d1g (talk) 13:09, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 Delete add just to avoid misunderstandings. --ValterVB (talk) 08:39, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
On 25 August you wrote, above, "Maybe it's necessary add more info?" Since then, more info has been added; not least citations, including one from a United Nations & Canadian Government source. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:49, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
I forgot to say, (my personal opinion naturally), "add more useful info" I don't see notability in info added. If admin that will close this request think different, no problem, the item will be keeped. --ValterVB (talk) 05:38, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

I close this request as  Not deleted. The item does not have sitelinks, and there is (currently) no use in any other item, so #1 and #3 of the notability criteria do not apply here. However, regarding #2 I think we all agree that it refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity (per references in the item, per available media at Wikimedia commons, and in fact also per 2017 Wikimania gig). While the three external identifiers do not really help to support notability, there are three publicly available references backing the important claims in the item, where the only question is whether they are serious, or, as one user questioned above a month ago when only one of them was there, “heavy weight”. I do rate them so, since undrip10.org, newswire.ca, and anishinabeknews.ca are independent websites not in control of the band itself, and seemingly operated by editorial departments. Please mind that the item is about a local, indigenous band, thus we cannot expect sources with world-wide recognition.

As a side note, not related to my decision, but related to the item: I would like to express my disappointment about the fact that we seemingly do not have a suitable property to use this item in Wikimania 2017 (Q21113296). A claim such as participant (P710) Moose Town Singers (Q35986646) should at least have a qualifier object has role (P3831) performing artist (Q16010345) to disambiguate them from other, “regular” participants of the conference. However, there are other items about events (festivals, Super Bowls, etc) which could be enriched with data about performing artists… so maybe one could think about a new sub-property of participant (P710) that could also help to link this band from the 2017 Wikimania item. —MisterSynergy (talk) 20:39, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

(delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Created a UP at Meta --Felipe da Fonseca (talk) 21:05, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

✓ DeletedMisterSynergy (talk) 21:11, 25 September 2017 (UTC)