Wikidata:Property proposal/video game mod

Description	mod for videogames
Represents	video game (Q7889)
Data type	Item
Domain	video game mod (Q865493)
Example 1	KFMod (Q59398000)→"Unreal Tournament 2004"
Example 2	Grezzo 2 (Q55381964)→"Doom"
Example 3	True Patch (Q63035708)→Vampire: The Masquerade – Bloodlines (unofficial patch)

Instead of always having to use based on (P144) i think it will make sense to give video game mods their own dedicated property. It's supposed to be like Wikidata:Property proposal/expansion but with video game mods instead of expansion packs or DLC. --Trade (talk) 23:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support David (talk) 07:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cwf97 (talk) 11:02, 13 July 2019 (EST)
Comment Couldn't this potentially fall under modified version of (P5059)? Also, I think it would need a clearer name if added, e.g: "video game mod of", "video game modified", "mod/modification of video game", "modifies video game", "base video game", etc. NoInkling (talk) 02:42, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't feel modified version of (P5059) is sufficient. It's not a different version or edition of the game, it's a modification that either changes certain aspects of the game or a full game that requires the original game in order to work. "Base video game" makes it sound like the mod were made by the original developer and would fit better with Wikidata:Property proposal/expansion. --Trade (talk) 02:53, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Technically the mod's class (its instance of (P31) value), or the property's qualifiers, could disambiguate those cases, but of course that makes things a little less obvious and/or more difficult to query. By the way I think "Represents" should be video game (Q7889) and "Domain" should be video game mod (Q865493) in the template. NoInkling (talk) 03:22, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]