Wikidata:Property proposal/Poster
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
poster[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
Not done
| Description | Template:File on Commons (if available) |
|---|---|
| Represents | poster (Q429785) |
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | Likely replaces over-specific Property:P3383, would be used for the extremely common (yet neglected) case of, for example, music posters, dance posters, theatrical posters. |
| Allowed values | Commons media file |
| Example 1 | Uttarakhand football team (Q7903395) would move image to poster |
| Example 2 | Cladonia rangiferina (Q248744) ditto |
| Example 3 | The Devil's Disciple (Q2072045) ditto |
| Planned use | Well, I'm currently working on a long set of posters for commons, none of which are film posters. |
| See also | image, film poster. |
Motivation[edit]
We literally have a filter trying to push the use of film poster (P3383) in inappropriate places, e.g. note under image (P18) statement at La Navarraise (Q2709440). Either fixing the over-specific "film poster" property, or adding this more generic term will help. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:02, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
- What speaks against widening the scope of film poster (P3383)? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 08:54, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl: I presume it'd need retranslated and linked more appropriately. That would be my preferred option, honestly, but I don't know how to even propose that. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Generally, the way to do this is to start a discussion on the talk page of the relevant property and ping all the people that participated in the property discussion that lead to the creation of the property and any WikiProjects that are associated with the property. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 20:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl, Adam Cuerden: I would also support widening the definition of film poster (P3383) --Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 09:02, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Generally, the way to do this is to start a discussion on the talk page of the relevant property and ping all the people that participated in the property discussion that lead to the creation of the property and any WikiProjects that are associated with the property. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 20:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Trade: please don't add statements in a constraint violating way as in the example of La Navarraise (Q2709440). If you think the scope of a property should be changed seek consensus for that instead of using it outside of the scope. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 08:58, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl, Vojtěch Dostál: Everything has frozen, it seems. What to do now? Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:00, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- If you seek input of additional people, you might ask in the project chat. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 07:50, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl, Vojtěch Dostál: Everything has frozen, it seems. What to do now? Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:00, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Oppose - widen the scope of P3383. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:19, 22 September 2019 (UTC)- Widen the other one. Thierry Caro (talk) 16:51, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- Use film poster (P3383) rather than creating a new property. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:58, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 20:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Not done, consensus to widen the scope of film poster (P3383). @Adam Cuerden: you can propose that on Property talk:P3383 by pinging people who got involved in the original property proposal. I would advise to clear existing translations (or adapt them if you can) − Pintoch (talk) 12:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
