Talk:Q732649
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — Crossrail (Q732649)
description: railway in London, UK
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Crossrail” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}
.
Notified participants of WikiProject Railways
- Hi PhiH, could you please undo your deletions that hinders the modeling? Thanks. --Bouzinac 💬●✒️●💛 08:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- No, I won't. If you want to do this kind of modeling, you need to adjust it to Wikidata, not the other war around. --PhiH (talk) 08:12, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- @PhiH: how do you suggest to « adjust it to Wikidata »? From what I understand (but maybe I overlooked it), Bouzinac was following the modeling of Wikidata:WikiProject Railways. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 14:17, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- part of (P361) and has part(s) (P527) aren't on that list for a good reason. It makes no sense to say that a station is "part" of Crossrail. These stations have been around way before Crossrail was even a thing and some of them aren't even exclusively served by the Elizabeth line. If Bouzinac wants to create this kind of query, they can use connecting service (P1192) instead of adding statements just for that purpose. --PhiH (talk) 14:31, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, reading that example sentence Work is ongoing at Bond Street Elizabeth line station, which means that it will not open with the other stations on 24 May. The station continues to make good progress and the team at Bond Street are working hard to open the station to customers later this year. taken from http://www.crossrail.co.uk/news/articles/elizabeth-line-to-open-on-24-may-2022. That sentence explains Crossrail is working to build the Bond street station. Hence Bond street is part of the crossail project. Same rationale for the others stations of the crossrail which have been built / reshaped by the crossrail project. Bouzinac 💬●✒️●💛 15:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Bond Street is constructed as part of the Crossrail project, for those stations this statement is more or less fine. Perhaps we have to distinguish between the project and the railway that was built – this item covers both. The stations on the existing lines weren't part of the Crossrail project. They are just served by the Elizabeth line now. --PhiH (talk) 17:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, reading that example sentence Work is ongoing at Bond Street Elizabeth line station, which means that it will not open with the other stations on 24 May. The station continues to make good progress and the team at Bond Street are working hard to open the station to customers later this year. taken from http://www.crossrail.co.uk/news/articles/elizabeth-line-to-open-on-24-may-2022. That sentence explains Crossrail is working to build the Bond street station. Hence Bond street is part of the crossail project. Same rationale for the others stations of the crossrail which have been built / reshaped by the crossrail project. Bouzinac 💬●✒️●💛 15:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- part of (P361) and has part(s) (P527) aren't on that list for a good reason. It makes no sense to say that a station is "part" of Crossrail. These stations have been around way before Crossrail was even a thing and some of them aren't even exclusively served by the Elizabeth line. If Bouzinac wants to create this kind of query, they can use connecting service (P1192) instead of adding statements just for that purpose. --PhiH (talk) 14:31, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- @PhiH: how do you suggest to « adjust it to Wikidata »? From what I understand (but maybe I overlooked it), Bouzinac was following the modeling of Wikidata:WikiProject Railways. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 14:17, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- No, I won't. If you want to do this kind of modeling, you need to adjust it to Wikidata, not the other war around. --PhiH (talk) 08:12, 24 May 2022 (UTC)