User talk:Ladsgroup

Jump to: navigation, search

About this board

By clicking "Add topic", you agree to our Terms of Use and agree to irrevocably release your text under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and GFDL
YMS (talkcontribs)

Hi Amir. I never really played the kian game so far, but wanted to give it a try now. So I don't know if this is a rare situation or if the models are broken, but all the suggestions kian made came from deVil2 and deGermany models, and almost all of them were complete nonsense. Probability was always (only) around 50 %, but still maybe you want to check.

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Hey, thanks for trying. Can you tell me if it's okay now or not? Thanks.

YMS (talkcontribs)

Yes, it's better now. I'm on the road right now, so I won't use it more for now, but I will do so some other time. Thank you!

Reply to "Kian game models"
VIGNERON (talkcontribs)

Hi,

Quick question : do you know where to ask for changes on the API.php page ?

For contexte : on https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=help&modules=wbgetclaims the second example use the property P2 which doesn't exist, it would be better to use a real property (P27 for instance). Or on https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=help&modules=wbsetlabel the translation in French is quite strange « considérer la comme un joli imprimé json » (for « and report it as pretty printed json ») and should be something along « présenter la au format json mis en forme ».

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Hey, depends, for translations you need to checkout translatewiki.net and fix it there. For examples you need to change the source code. Explain me in details and I make patches for them.

VIGNERON (talkcontribs)

Thank you, I didn't though to look at translatewiki (which is totally logical whan I thinnk about it).

For the second case, I found and corrected MediaWiki:Apihelp-wbsetlabel-example-1/fr.

For the first case, I'm stuck, I found MediaWiki:Apihelp-wbgetclaims-example-2/en but it's only the description of the example, how can I change the original example itself? (ping Lea Lacroix (WMDE))

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

It's in the source code here. I can fix it.

VIGNERON (talkcontribs)

Can you do it ?

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Yes and I'll do soon.

VIGNERON (talkcontribs)

Thank you!

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Here's the patch: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/323679

Reply to "API Mediawiki"
Jura1 (talkcontribs)

Nice work! Thanks for doing that.

BTW, you might want to have wikidata link on page properties as well.

e.g. "wikidatawiki" on https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q789447&action=info#Page_properties

would link to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:EntityUsage/Q789447

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Hey, yes. That's a known bug: phab:T149598

Jura1 (talkcontribs)

ok. As wikidatawiki is the repository, maybe it should be listed first.

Jura1 (talkcontribs)

Another point. I think I brought this up before, but I don't recall the outcome.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sp%C3%A9cial:EntityUsage/P3296 doesn't list the article where the property is used:

It can be found with https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%C3%A9gorie:Page_utilisant_P3296

Will this be added or do users have to continue make such categories?

Reply to "Entity usage"
Pasleim (talkcontribs)

Please don't add labels in "bh". According to mw:Manual:$wgDummyLanguageCodes this is only a dummy language code and "bho" should be used instead.

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Sorry for a very belated answer. I got it fixed now.

Reply to "bh labels"

"Under stjernerne på himlen" and Godsmack

4
Fnielsen (talkcontribs)

This edit seems strange. There is no reference Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 16:13, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Ref is added in the next edit:

Fnielsen (talkcontribs)

But it really does not make any sense to me. There is no mentioning of Godsmack on in the English Wikipedia for that song. There must be some extraction error and the imported from (P143) does not indicate why. ~~~~

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

It can happen due to vandalism of someone in articles. These cases are rare and won't happen unless someone doing something very nasty.

Reply to ""Under stjernerne på himlen" and Godsmack"
XXN (talkcontribs)

Hi. Here is a list of 467 items (source) which can be deleted as they have by only one sitelink - a page in sv.wiki (former disambiguation page) which now is a redirect to another page (disambiguation, but not always, thus merging items it's not appropriate). Can you put your bot do it?

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Definitely. You will have it by end of the day :)

XXN (talkcontribs)

Thanks!

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Done now :)

XXN (talkcontribs)

Q26434002 (hist), Q5674614 (hist) :D

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Deleted :)

Reply to "Items for deletion"
Infovarius (talkcontribs)

Amir, what did you mean by such value (look at Reasonator)? And please correct P366 also.

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Hey, Here's Reasonator. Can you explain what is wrong and what should I do?

Infovarius (talkcontribs)

You've added a lot of P31:Q5576117, while this item is a disambig, so it is wrong. May be you meant some value from this disambig? Also all P366:Q5576117 (in the same items?) are wrong.

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Okay, I see it now. I'll get it fixed ASAP

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

All done now.

Pasleim (talkcontribs)

no label (Q6416738), Dehkhair (Q5666897) and no label (Q5669348) are similar cases. If you could fix the links to these items it would be great.

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Sure, In the weekend sounds fine to do this

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Okay, I've got no label (Q6416738) and no label (Q5669348) covered. But for Dehkhair (Q5666897), this one needs to be split and that can't be done without lots of coding. I'll do it next weekend. Have fun.

Reply to "Q5576117"
Jura1 (talkcontribs)

Hi Amir,

Would you revise your comment at ? We still seek a reference for the suggested change. Consensus or not this is needed. The proposer has provided one that we think is questionable.

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Hey, why do you think Property_talk:P17#Proposal_for_solution_I is not enough for consensus? Feel free to seek for third party opinion.

Jura1 (talkcontribs)

As for any statement, we need a reference that supports this. See the comment by Andrew Gray (talk) 22:20, 13 September 2016 (UTC) in the section above.

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

I read that part and couldn't find any reason to on hold the consensuses. TLDR of his comment is that "I'd be happy with either" and "Neither is perfect, but either is defensible". As I told you, feel free to ask another admin (probably in WD:AN) for a third party opinion.

Jura1 (talkcontribs)

The question is the reference. Andrew Gray writes "The quote on p. 885 of Saul & Stephens is a bit of an odd one to pick". If you think it's a good reference for the point, it might be worth saying that there.

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

You can talk to User:Kaldari

Jura1 (talkcontribs)

Given that it's malfunctioning, I asked it to be blocked.

Reply to "Lacking reference"
Srittau (talkcontribs)

Hello, when loading item pages, often (but not always) the JavaScript is not loaded properly, so that many important widgets are missing. This is apparently caused by your script. Chrome (version 53 at the moment) aborts in line 13:

index.php?title=User:Ladsgroup/wdqs.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript:13 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'IconWidget' of undefined

I suspect an async loading problem, i.e. the script defining OO.ui.IconWidget has not been loaded before your script gets loaded. After the load has finished, the object OO.ui.IconWidget is available from the console.

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Hey, It's because of the missing dependency. I fixed and moved everything to a gadget, please enable the EasyQuery gadget in your presences and stop using my old script :)

Reply to "User:Ladsgroup/wdqs.js"

Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

(That message in other languages: العربية • ‎bosanski • ‎català • ‎Deutsch • ‎Esperanto • ‎français • ‎עברית • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎اردو • ‎中文 – ‎translate that message)

Hello!

Like some other community members, you are using Flow.

An increasing number of communities now use Flow or are considering it. Although Flow itself is not scheduled for major development during 2016 fiscal year, the Collaboration Team remains interested in the project and in providing an improved system for structured discussions.

You can help us make decisions about the way forward in this area by sharing your thoughts about Flow — what works, doesn't work or should be improved?

Please fill out this survey (available in multiple languages), which is administered by a third-party service. It will not require an email or your username. See our privacy statement.

Thanks for your ideas and opinions about Flow!

Trizek (WMF), on behalf of the Collaboration team, 11:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Reply to "Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey"