Wikidata:Property proposal/music video

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

music video[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work

   Done: music video (P6718) (Talk and documentation)
Descriptionshort film integrating this song with imagery
Representsmusic video (Q193977)
Data typeItem
Domainsongs or singles
Allowed valuesinstances of music video (Q193977)
Example 1Gangnam Style (Q890)Gangnam Style (Q17747156)
Example 2Despacito (Q28572509)Despacito (Q63183401)
Example 3Shape of You (Q59162147)Shape of You (Q63237372)


There seems to be a gap per discussion with @Kam Solusar: on Wikidata talk:WikiProject Movies (Add your motivation for this property here.) --- Jura 09:45, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


  • Symbol support vote.svg Support David (talk) 07:36, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Makes sense, perhaps @Jc86035, Moebeus: would be interested. Mahir256 (talk) 16:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very much interested, thanks for the heads up! Moebeus (talk) 16:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Trivialist (talk) 22:11, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm usually in favor of using broader properties rather than ones with quite narrow applications, but I don't see a good way to model the relationship between singles/songs and their official music videos with our currently available properties. So this seems like something we definitely need. --Kam Solusar (talk) 12:57, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:52, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Is this for only official music videos, or any video integrating the song? --Yair rand (talk) 18:36, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
@Yair rand: It would make sense to restrict its use to official music videos; I believe there was an objection to the creation of YouTube playlist ID (P4300) unless such a stipulation were added. Mahir256 (talk) 20:42, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Very happy about this so thank you all involved, but the inverse based on constraint is weird, no? Moebeus (talk) 20:53, 30 April 2019 (UTC)