Wikidata:Property proposal/intangible cultural heritage status
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
intangible cultural heritage status[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
| Description | status of an item that is designated as intangible heritage |
|---|---|
| Represents | intangible cultural heritage (Q59544) |
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | Not sure, maybe craft (Q2207288), party (Q200538), tradition (Q82821) |
| Example | rotogravure (Q635658) → National Inventory of Intangible Cultural Heritage in France (Q21011287) |
| Robot and gadget jobs | Move the declaration of P1435 to the new property with petscan or a bot |
| See also | heritage designation (P1435) |
- Motivation
I have a problem with intangible cultural heritage (Q59544), it's generally imcompatible with haft of the constraints of heritage designation (P1435). Intangible heritage don't have a country or limited by a administrative area, and the type don't macht since lot of intagible heritage use subclass of (P279) instead of instance of (P31). So I propose the creation a new property that will more ajusted to this type of heritage. Fralambert (talk) 02:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support. I see your point about the differences between intangible cultural heritage and other types. I see how many of those attributes are irrelevant for intangible entities. This property makes sense to me. YULdigitalpreservation (talk) 14:08, 27 September 2016 (UTC)- Support, reasonable arguments.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done @Fralambert, Ymblanter, YULdigitalpreservation: please make good use of it.
--- Jura 06:45, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
