User talk:Bukk

Welcome to Wikidata, Bukk!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

• Introduction – An introduction to the project.
• Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
• Community portal – The portal for community members.
• User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
• Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
• Project chat – Discussions about the project.
• Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards!

--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:32, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Merge of relief object class and technique

Hello Bukk,
relief sculpture (Q245117) and relief sculpture (Q23662753) were for different things, one for the class of sculpture, one for the technique; perhaps they weren't well differentiated, maybe. I think they shouldn't have been merged though. But if you merge them, please fix all the things that depend on those items as well, items like high relief (Q5784272) that now have the wrong subclass of (P279) etc. (Special:WhatLinksHere/Q245117 can help), the IDs like Q245117#P1014 that now have constraint violations and should simply be on three items, so if the merge isn't undone a new item for the technique is needed. Perhaps it's easier to undo the merge. Unfortunately, merges like this one are difficult to undo, since redirect links get resolved by bot, links on other projects get changed, like here. I'm sorry I can't help to fix all this since I don't have much time these days, but I hope you all can fix it asap because the trouble from those merges (there have been many like this) gets only worse and worse by time.
Sorry for my scared scaring comment, comes from some history of unpleasant experiences with similar merges. Please don't take it amiss. It might be quite some work but will be possible to fix. Cheers and happy editing, --Marsupium (talk) 15:19, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

It seems bot redirect resolving has affected 399 entities (see toollabs:editgroups/b/KrBotResolvingRedirect/Q23662753_Q245117) and is probably not so difficult to undo. --Marsupium (talk) 15:33, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Duplicate Q61636593 - Why?

Hi Bukk,

The pier, Llandudno (Q61636593) is a duplicate of The pier, Llandudno (Q23753599) - did you create it for a specific purpose? You've even replicated the errors from Commons that have already been corrected in Wikidata, i.e. the dimensions. Please search before creating new items. Simon Cobb (User:Sic19 ; talk page) 19:35, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Bukk,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikidata and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 17:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Bukk,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:53, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

We sent you an e-mail

Hello Bukk,

Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email surveys@wikimedia.org.

You can see my explanation here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Please don't use unknown (Q24238356)

Hi Bukk, thanks for adding all the paintings. Could you please don't use unknown (Q24238356) for the collection (P195) like you did on A winter landscape with figures skating on a frozen river (Q103862808)? Please either use private collection (Q768717) or unknown value. Same for creator (P170), but here anonymous (Q4233718) or unknown value. Thank you, Multichill (talk) 15:40, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

ok. Bukk (talk) 15:47, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

By the way, if you're planning to import more paintings from Commons: Create a new item here, but don't add any statements yet. Add the link on the file on Commons. A link to https://quickstatements.toolforge.org to populate the Wikidata item will appear. Import the statements and you just have to do a bit of clean up and add a few by hand. Multichill (talk) 16:36, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. But I didn't quite understood how to do the https://quickstatements.toolforge.org link. Greets!Bukk (talk) 12:50, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

link = wikidata qualifier!Bukk (talk) 12:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata_talk:WikiProject_sum_of_all_paintings#Drawings_by_Leonardo_da_Vinci contains an example. Does that help? Multichill (talk) 17:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Duplicate paintings

Hi Bukk, I see you're creating a lot of missing paintings based on Commons. Great! I do notice quite a few duplicates like for example Selfportrait, called La Surprise (The surprise) (Q112252123) & Selfportrait, called Le Silence (The Silence) (Q112252113). Might be better to not work on images from collections that are complete. The collections on Wikidata that are complete are listed at Commons:Data:Completely indexed painting collections.tab. This is used by the artwork template so that if the institution field is set to a completed collection (for example Institution:Nationalmuseum Stockholm), it will add the file to Commons:Category:Paintings from completely indexed collections. Maybe try to match the files in this category to existing items or just skip them? Multichill (talk) 13:21, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Multichill! Thanks for the info. I'll try consider that. Greetz! Bukk (talk) 16:29, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Mr. Attribution was never a painter

Hi Bukk, thanks for taking an interest in paintings! Please do not remvove former attributions and please do not assign attribution to the non-human attribution (Q230768), as you did here. Old paintings should have current attributiion but if available, they should also have all their documented former attributions as well. You can deprecate these as neceessary, but in this case I see you reverted a current attribution according to the RKD. See your edits here: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q17338831&type=revision&diff=1489825797&oldid=1489824924 strange removal of attributions! Jane023 (talk) 11:07, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

@Jane023: probably just the script tripping up over the complex templates: {{Creator:Bartholomeus van Bassen|attributed to}}:{{LangSwitch|de=oder|en=or|nl=of}}{{Creator:Dirck van Delen|attributed to}}

Fixed and sourced it. Multichill (talk) 11:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! Jane023 (talk) 15:39, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks to both of you. Greetz! Bukk (talk) 17:08, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Automated report of empty item: Q114354598

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 06:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Automated report of empty item: Q113513698

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 06:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Automated report of empty item: Q116621380

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 08:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Automated report of empty item: Q116741206

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 16:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Automated report of empty item: Q115693834

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 12:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Automated report of empty item: Q116447142

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 08:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Automated report of empty item: Q116771788

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 11:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Automated report of empty item: Q116771802

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 12:03, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Automated report of empty item: Q116993293

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 14:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Automated report of empty item: Q117422646

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 11:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Automated report of empty item: Q118464275

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 07:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Automated report of empty item: Q118436253

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 07:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Automated report of empty item: Q118846747

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 10:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Many duplicates items

Hello @Bukk

You regularly create items for the Louvre paintings collections; these are almost all duplicates. I've pointed this out to you several times by cancelling your edits( https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q119441048&oldid=1915531040, https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q119440076&oldid=1915527184 , https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q119439842&oldid=1915526289 ...), but you continue this bad practice: yesterday https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q122493936&oldid=1975417956 . Those contributions give extra work to others who rigorously maintain Wikidata items. We all know that many images on Wikimedia Commons are not linked to a Wikidata item. Thats's not a reason to create automatically items on wikidata without check or it would be a huge mess. In that case improving the categorization on Commons would be more useful.

In Wikidata, for Louvre collections artworks there are many ways to check before creating an item if it already exists: search in wikidata, search in collections.louvre.fr and ID check with a SparQL query, Open Art Browser, Gudea website. The same could be done for other collections.

An example among many: you created a duplicate item for Woman with a Mirror (Q23922) which has already an item on Wikidata since 2012 . Please be careful to not create so many duplicates. Best regards Shonagon (talk) 16:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Shonagon! How can I find duplicates? The search function of Wikidata didn't report any. I looked in the categories and found any either. Greetz! Bukk (talk) 10:36, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Bukk

Almost all painting of the Department of Paintings of the Louvre (Q3044768) have already items in wikidata. So the probability of creating duplicates for this collection is extremely high. To be sure that an item creation will not be a duplicate, the best way is to check the ID Louvre which has its property Louvre Museum ARK ID (P9394). Items of Louvre collections should have ark ID which can be found on records in the official website collections.louvre.fr. The collection data are unfortunately only available in French but with creator name and collection, it's easy to reduce the scope of results. I monitor and maintain these Louvre IDs on Wikidata. So to find out if the item has already been created, all you have to do is find the ark ID and do a query on the ID:

SELECT DISTINCT ?item ?itemLabel ?dptLabel ?img (GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT ?inv; separator="; ") AS ?invs)
WHERE
{
  ?item wdt:P195 ?dpt.
  ?item wdt:P9394 ?ark.
  VALUES ?ark {"010062292"}.
  OPTIONAL{?item wdt:P18 ?img}
  OPTIONAL{?item wdt:P217 ?inv}
  SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "[AUTO_LANGUAGE],en". }
} GROUP BY ?item ?itemLabel ?dptLabel ?img

Try it!

If there's no item matching the ID, there isn't one yet and it can be created. That's how I do it myself.

For information, you created paintings items which are actually not paintings but pastel drawings. There is not a drop of paint on these 2 works: Portrait of René Frémin (Q122452278) Self-portrait (Q122574680). It's still great to have created them. Nevertheless, this indicates that we should take the information on Wikimedia Commons carefully and check on the official or another authority website before creating an element. Apart from the Louvre's paintings, and in particular the drawings or paintings in others collections, there are still plenty of things to do. Best regards Shonagon (talk) 19:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Shonagon! Thank you for your detailed explanation how to find Louvre artworks. I'll try to keep it in mind. Greetz! Bukk (talk) 09:24, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Q123693643

Madonna mit Kind und San Francesco is not the name of this painting and the label is obviously broken. --Tagishsimon (talk) 13:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Thx for informing me. I've changed the title. Greetz! --Bukk (talk) 13:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)