User talk:Ayack/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page. |
Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! Wikidata is a free knowledge base that can be read and edited by humans and machines alike, and you can help. Go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familarise yourself with:
- Wikidata:About - About the project.
- Wikidata:Introduction - Another introduction to the project.
- Help:Contents - The main help portal for editing and using the site.
- Wikidata:Project chat - Discussions about the project.
If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.
--Deansfa (talk) 15:13, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Mérimée & Palissy[edit]
Salut,
Juste pour t'avertir que sur Tunic of Argenteuil (Q3542095), tu as ajouté un identifiant Palissy avec la propriété Mérimée ID (P380), forcément cela ne fonctionne pas vraiment et cela génère une erreur (que je viens de corriger et du coup, j'en ai profité pour répondre à Robin ci-dessus).
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 11:56, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Salut VIGNERON, merci du signalement et de la correction, je devais être fatigué à ce moment là. Et merci pour au-dessus, j'avais la flemme d'argumenter en anglais... @+ — Ayack (talk) 21:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Correct merge ? wrangler[edit]
Hi, it seems your merge is not totally correct. The french description is "person who prepares horses for competitions", but the english article seems way more north american related and is absolutely not specific to sports. It seems that both items are specialisations of something more general, but are not mergeables. author TomT0m / talk page 10:00, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- @TomT0m: ok, je suis allé trop vite, j'ai annulé. — Ayack (talk) 10:07, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Benezit ID double claims[edit]
Hi Ayack, you added double claims to quite a few items. Can you have a look at this? Multichill (talk) 08:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Informations sans source exportées de fr:wikipedia[edit]
Bonjour Vous avez republié des informations que j'avais supprimées. Quelques explications pour situer le contexte de mes suppressions. Un jeune écrivain et sa famille sont harcelés par un contributeur de fr:wikipedia. Sur plusieurs pages de fr:wikipedia ont été publiées des informations sans source, ou sourcées par une page de réseau social (copains d'avant), ou sourcée par des extrapolations abusives (sur des annuaires, par exemple ou un site de location). Wikipédia a révélé le nom des sœurs et des parents de l'écrivain. Le harceleur a créé une page wikidata avant de demander la création d'une page fr:wikipédia (pour le père). J'ai réussi à faire supprimer la page de la mère sur wikidata. Aucun média n'a publié ces informations (date de naissance, relations familiales). Est-ce la mission de wikidata banque de données de donner de l'importance (ou de révéler) des informations personnelles privées ? Le respect de la vie privée n'est pas en usage sur wikidata ? Wikidata accepte la publication d'informations sans source ? Que conseiller à cette famille victime de ce harcèleur depuis des mois sur fr:wikipédia ? Merci
Administrator permissions[edit]
Hello! Unfortunately, your administrator permissions have been removed since you did not meet the activity requirement, per WD:A. You are welcome to reapply when you are more active. Thank you for your contributions to Wikidata in the past! --Rschen7754 17:21, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello Ayack, I see you have created GCatholic church ID (P2971), which was due to your own proposal. This is not allowed by this request for comment. I warn you not to do this again. Lymantria (talk) 16:23, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Lymantria, sorry but I read again Wikidata:Créateurs de propriétés and I don't see this new rule. So thanks for informing me of this, but please don't "warn" me, I find this very insulting as I followed the rules (consensus + 1 week period). — Ayack (talk) 07:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Ayack, I'm sorry to see that in the French version the new rule is not implemented, it does in the English however. My point is that you have in fact created P2971 in violation with this rule. As I think you have done so in good faith, I have not done more than warn you not to do that again. I think I am obliged to, in fact. But I think you did so in good faith, so perhaps that helps you accept it and not feel insulted. Lymantria (talk) 05:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Lymantria, ok, I have updated the French version so it won't happen again (at least for French users). I felt insulted because yes, I've done so in good faith (in the past, I created many properties I proposed myself) and I associate the verb "warn" to a threat. But I understand your point and I consider the matter closed. Regards, — Ayack (talk) 10:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Ayack, I'm sorry to see that in the French version the new rule is not implemented, it does in the English however. My point is that you have in fact created P2971 in violation with this rule. As I think you have done so in good faith, I have not done more than warn you not to do that again. I think I am obliged to, in fact. But I think you did so in good faith, so perhaps that helps you accept it and not feel insulted. Lymantria (talk) 05:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)