Talk:Q124254783
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — Zhengyan Lin (Q124254783)
description: Chinese mathematician (1941- )
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Zhengyan Lin” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Generic queries for authors
This section is generated with {{Generic queries for authors}}.
- List of works written by Zhengyan Lin (query)
- List of works authored by Zhengyan Lin, ordered by sitelinks (query)
- List of works written by Zhengyan Lin with instance of property (query)
- List of written works he/she has authored with genre property (query)
- Timeline of Zhengyan Lin (query)
- Narrative location of works written by Zhengyan Lin (query)
- Map of narrative location of works written by Zhengyan Lin (query)
- List of co-authors, sorted by number of collaborations (query)
- Graph of co-authors (query)
- See also : Synia#author : Zhengyan Lin
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Conflated item, now merged[edit]
Moved from conflated item Q59610395
Hi @Miraclepine: This item was created by Reinheitsgebot on base of VIAF: mathematician (GND) vs. sinologist (LCAuth). It says:
You've merge the conflated item with Q115756217 (18 December 2022 version) and than reused Q115756217 for Artem G. Abanov, a Russian physicist. Imho a restart is necessary. Three new items should be created and then the old ones should be deleted. @MisterSynergy: If you feel better, can you have a look? --Kolja21 (talk) 22:43, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- I've started with Zhengyan Lin (Q116742464): Taiwanese sinologist. --Kolja21 (talk) 23:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- If everything is sorted out, I'll delete this conflation item. Q115756217 should also be migrated to a fresh item without reuse-history. —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo @Miraclepine: You've created Q115756217 for Zhenyang Lin, than you've merge the item, restored it and now Zhenyang Lin is Artem G. Abanov. Please delete these items and make a new start. --Kolja21 (talk) 05:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Kolja21: Hi. I had done these back when I preferred IAR in these cases, before community consensus clarified otherwise that there wasn't really a cost in adding an item than reusing a merged item. If you mean all 100-something of them, understood; I have the lists linked here ([1], [2], [3]). I'm currently busy today with RL at the moment, but I'll try to do as many of them with User:Magnus Manske/duplicate item.js and RFD as time permits. In the meantime I've dealt with Q115756217 at RFD. ミラP@Miraclepine 18:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Kolja21: Courtesy ping for fixed link at [4] due to database error in the original one. ミラP@Miraclepine 18:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo @Miraclepine: You've created Q115756217 for Zhenyang Lin, than you've merge the item, restored it and now Zhenyang Lin is Artem G. Abanov. Please delete these items and make a new start. --Kolja21 (talk) 05:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- If everything is sorted out, I'll delete this conflation item. Q115756217 should also be migrated to a fresh item without reuse-history. —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
I've moved the discussion from the conflated item (Q59610395). Now separated:
- Zhengyan Lin (Q124254783): Chinese mathematician (1941- )
- Zhengyan Lin (Q116742464): Taiwanese sinologist
- Artem G. Abanov (Q124253374): Russian condensed-matter physicist
--Kolja21 (talk) 02:27, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- @MisterSynergy: Everything is sorted out. Can you be so kind to delete Q59610395. --Kolja21 (talk) 02:55, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Done —MisterSynergy (talk) 20:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- @MisterSynergy: Shouldn't the others on this RFD discussion also be deleted? All of them have been spunoff to new items per the procedure recommended at the above discussion, and I recently just spotted a bad merge. ミラP@Miraclepine 21:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have only glanced over that request, but yes it looks like those should be deleted. The request as it is presented is difficult to process, though, as it is relatively tedious to collect all necessary information for each nominated item. —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- @MisterSynergy: No worries, I duplicated all the info with User:Magnus_Manske/duplicate_item.js and should have all the items (old and new) on my watchlist in case any of them are edited. ミラP@Miraclepine 23:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have only glanced over that request, but yes it looks like those should be deleted. The request as it is presented is difficult to process, though, as it is relatively tedious to collect all necessary information for each nominated item. —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- @MisterSynergy: Shouldn't the others on this RFD discussion also be deleted? All of them have been spunoff to new items per the procedure recommended at the above discussion, and I recently just spotted a bad merge. ミラP@Miraclepine 21:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
