Property talk:P4626

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

identity of object in context
qualifier to specify the identity that applies to a statement when the object of the statement has another identity covered by another item
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Scope is as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4626#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL

Identity of object vs part of object[edit]

@Nikki, @ArthurPSmith, @Jheald, @Valentina.Anitnelav, @Kolja21, @Deryck Chan, @Swpb, @ChristianKl (as active participants in earlier discussion of the properties mentioned): I have made a statement L312484-S1location of sense usage (P6084)England (Q21)identity of object in context (P4626)southern part (Q112265589) to indicate where (geographically) a particular sense of turnip (L312484) is in use.

I first tried applies to part (P518), but as the discussion at Property talk:P518#Part of subject, or part of object ? resulted in "part" being interpreted as referring to the subject only (it's not the "southern part" of the sense, whatever that means, that is common in all of England, but the entire sense that is common in the southern part of England), I picked out identity of object in context (P4626) as the most appropriate replacement qualifier among those being suggested. As a bonus, in contrast to applies to part (P518) it didn't result in any constraint violations.

However, I'm concerned "identity of object" doesn't quite describe the relation between all of England (the object) and its southern part (here its "identity"), when the statement (or the sense, or the lexeme) makes up the context. I just feel that both object has role (P3831) and applies to name of object (P8338) would be worse in that regard. Any comments on this? SM5POR (talk) 20:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, southern part is not the same entity as England and thus this property doesn't work for you use-case and just wrong. L312484-S1location of sense usage (P6084)Southern England (Q1134643) would be much better for this example. I see no good reason for using qualifiers here. ChristianKl22:13, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I actually wasn't aware Southern England (Q1134643) was a "thing", and while its exact boundary maybe doesn't coincide with the linguistic border, the latter is inherently fuzzy anyway, so it's no worse than southern part (Q112265589). I have adjusted my statements, and that resolves the matter for South Yorkshire (Q23095) and North East England (Q47983) too.
This leaves "most Commonwealth countries", but I changed it to L312484-S1location of sense usage (P6084)Commonwealth of Nations (Q7785)nature of statement (P5102)mainly (Q91013007) which will do for now even if it sounds a little off grammatically (it may suffer from the same problem as applies to part (P518) by referring to the subject sense rather than the geographic area).
The en:Turnip (terminology) article stands out a bit with this amount of detail for just a single word, which is why I tried to model it with a lexeme to find out which properties aren't sufficiently expressive. I don't expect a lot of these unless someone dumps a truckload of language usage data into Wikipedia. SM5POR (talk) 10:33, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any good answers... We specified identity of object in context (P4626) well before Senses became widely used. I think ChristianKl's solution will be fine. Deryck Chan (talk) 22:18, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]