Property talk:P1056
Documentation
material or product produced by an organization, industry, facility, or process
| Represents | product (Q2424752) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data type | Item | ||||||||||||
| Template parameter | e.g. Template:Infobox mine (Q6157431) : "products =" | ||||||||||||
| Domain | According to this template:
chemical elements, metals, rocks, oil & gas (= natural resources)
According to statements in the property:
When possible, data should only be stored as statementsorganization (Q43229), industrial sector (Q8148), facility (Q13226383), process (Q3249551), mine (Q820477), brand (Q431289), community (Q177634), craft (Q2207288), government agency (Q327333), profession (Q28640), occupation (Q12737077), human (Q5), industry (Q268592), production process (Q1408286), source (Q31464082), activity (Q1914636), appliance (Q1183543), fictional entity (Q14897293), model series (Q811701), course (Q600134), application (Q166142), economic sector (Q3958441) or art genre (Q1792379) | ||||||||||||
| Allowed values | types of chemical substance (Q79529) (note: this should be moved to the property statements) | ||||||||||||
| Example | Jaduguda Uranium Mine (Q15229130) → uranium (Q1098) Groningen gas field (Q2069152) → natural gas (Q40858) Airbus (Q67) → Airbus A320 family (Q6475) tourism industry (Q9323634) → tourism services (Q120719571) | ||||||||||||
| Source | Mostly various websites and some fact books. (note: this information should be moved to a property statement; use property source website for the property (P1896)) | ||||||||||||
| Tracking: usage | Category:Pages using Wikidata property P1056 (Q21037880) | ||||||||||||
| See also | manufacturer (P176), made from material (P186), fabrication method (P2079), by-product (P2821), natural product of taxon (P1582), produced by (P2849), has effect (P1542), produced sound (P4733), production statistics (P2746), raw material processed (P10672), harvested organism(s) (P10960), operator (P137) | ||||||||||||
| Lists |
| ||||||||||||
| Proposal discussion | Proposal discussion | ||||||||||||
| Current uses |
| ||||||||||||
| Search for values |
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1056#Type Q43229, Q8148, Q13226383, Q3249551, Q820477, Q431289, Q177634, Q2207288, Q327333, Q28640, Q12737077, Q5, Q268592, Q1408286, Q31464082, Q1914636, Q1183543, Q14897293, Q811701, Q600134, Q166142, Q3958441, Q1792379, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1056#Value type Q7079603, Q11651, Q11379, Q13226383, Q2424752, Q11028, Q1172284, Q1408286, Q1371819, Q1310239, Q3566043, Q1799072, Q28877, Q110832782, Q7406919, Q192276, Q14897293, Q8187769, Q16686448, Q58778, Q4406616, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1056#Entity types
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1056#Scope, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1056#Conflicts with P31, search, SPARQL
Limit to materials or expand to all products?[edit]
We need to be able to claim things like, this factory produces cars, aircraft, etc. or that this company's products are mobile devices.
But, should we create a new property for products, or use this one? Danrok (talk) 15:35, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- In the property proposal, Snipre suggests that this would be a good use for this property, to which I agree (and apparently you do also). I see little reason not to; there may be some clarification needed in other languages however. @Infovarius, snipre:. --Izno (talk) 12:51, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Of which class would be target? --Infovarius (talk) 14:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- If you are referring to the current constraints, I think the "organization" constraint is fine. The other constraint would need to be removed or modified to "chemical OR product OR etc." Are the constraints what you are asking about? --Izno (talk) 14:55, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- I agree about expanding this property. When considering finished products, P1056 is the inverse of P176, so I would say target classes should be the same as the domain classes of Property:P176, plus Q79529, so: Q79529 or Q2424752 or Q811430. The only issue is that P176 has leaky constraints with items that are "model"s, such as Q3231690, which is a constraint violation at P176 and actually the number one user of P176. So maybe also include Q17444171 for both the domain of P176 and the targets of P1056. --Haplology (talk) 02:42, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- If you are referring to the current constraints, I think the "organization" constraint is fine. The other constraint would need to be removed or modified to "chemical OR product OR etc." Are the constraints what you are asking about? --Izno (talk) 14:55, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Of which class would be target? --Infovarius (talk) 14:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Comment I expanded values to goods (Q28877) 
because it is associated with process (Q3249551) and organization (Q43229) d1g (talk) 07:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Expanding this property for the domains of biology and medicine[edit]
A similar property is required for biology and medicine, I have initiated a property proposal for its reverse property 'produced by'. Instead of generating a new property 'produces', the domain of this one could be expanded for biology and medicine. Sebotic (talk) 00:51, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
WikiProject Molecular biology has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.
Notified participants of WikiProject Medicine
- @Sebotic: The type statistics Wikidata:Database_reports/Constraint_violations/P1056#Types_statistics_2 already show that the property has been adapted to many use cases. If you think your use-case fits with the others we just have to update the constraint template and some of the descriptions. --Tobias1984 (talk) 10:10, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Tobias1984: Yes, I think that would work very well as a biologic cell, tissue, organ, gland is basically a biochemical factory. Furthermore, the National Cancer Institute Thesaurus (C51980), the Bio Assay Ontology (BAO_0003067) and the Systems Biology Ontology (SBO_0000011) know the concept of 'product'. Thanks! Sebotic (talk) 05:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- How would this be a similar property? What is the relation between the two? Could you give a simple description that would cover the full use of this property were it to be extended as you propose? --Yair rand (talk) 06:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Why not "has product"?[edit]
I think the English label of this property should be changed to has product, in order to emphasize the fact that the subject is the producer and the object is the product. In general I find that property labels have a clearer meaning when they contain verbs. Mushroom (talk) 16:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
why is subclass of product not valid[edit]
Why is artificial object (Q15401930) and their subclasses like artwork not valid for this item? A product is the result of a production process. --Hannolans (talk) 12:16, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Hannolans: Probably because the "relation" (P2309) of "value type constraint" (Q21510865) was "instance of" (Q21503252), the items as class were not valid. I changed the "relation" from "instance of" to "instance or subclass of" (Q30208840). Hope this can solve the problem. --Neo-Jay (talk) 23:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Crafts[edit]
Can we add craft (Q2207288) as a valid class of subjects for this property, so that "lacemaking" <material produced> lace is a valid statement? - PKM (talk) 18:20, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support. Swpb (talk) 15:33, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- No objections, so I will make that change. - PKM (talk) 03:58, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
(Open) Standards[edit]
Please support open standard (Q681263) as a valid class of subject for this property. --Mcrusoe (talk) 11:05, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Mcrusoe: I don't understand. What does a standard produce? I'm inclined to oppose your proposal. Daask (talk) 22:21, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Daask: It would be useful to say which standards a product implements or is compatible with. --Mcrusoe (talk) 14:07, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Products of brand[edit]
Will it be right to use this property for brand (Q431289) and trademark (Q167270)? For example,
⟩ product or material produced or service provided (P1056) ⟨ chocolate bar (Q1361086) ⟩product or material produced or service provided (P1056)
⟨ ice cream (Q13233) ⟩product or material produced or service provided (P1056)
⟨ soft drink (Q147538) ⟩--Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 13:28, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- The brand doesn't produce the material, so I would assume not. --Yair rand (talk) 02:29, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I have added appliance (Q1183543) to the list of possible classes, as a product can be produced by such. If there are any concerns regarding the change, let's discuss them here. -- H005 (talk) 09:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
type constraint: natural physical object (Q16686022) and source (Q31464082)[edit]
I changed type constraint: natural physical object (Q16686022) to source (Q31464082) with this edit. It looks like natural physical object (Q16686022) was added by Swpb and Manu1400 in September 2020 so that Northwest Rota (Q3056587), an instance of volcano, could have a valid statement Northwest Rota (Q3056587)product or material produced or service provided (P1056)carbon dioxide (Q1997). I added volcano (Q8072)subclass of (P279)source (Q31464082)
natural physical object (Q16686022) seemed too broad of a constraint to me, although I fear that source (Q31464082) may be as well, but it made more sense to me. Daask (talk) 22:19, 3 April 2021 (UTC)