Wikidata talk:Requests for comment/Redirect vs. deletion

RFC or Request for vote?

Shouldn't there be some form of discussion and exchange of arguments before we start voting? Multichill (talk) 20:25, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

+1. It's called Requests for comment. So please comment/discuss the proposal and don't vote. --Succu (talk) 20:36, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Bene*: You can draft what ever you like, but this reflects only your POV anyway. --Succu (talk) 21:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

@Succu: of course but that's why I called it draft. ;-) We can just discuss that draft and than decide to make it a guideline or change some things. -- Bene* ^t_a^l_k 21:38, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Bene*, you used your draft as an argument. I hope we can discuss pros and cons here, before we continue the same way as always in these RfCs. --Succu (talk)

Indeed I am quite surprised that no comments/discussions have been added so far. Lymantria (talk) 05:22, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

It's exactly a clone of what happened in project chat. A list of opinions without justiication (The closest thing that looked like a justification I can see is my opinion (I don't see any advantage of making an exception), but it has been left unanswered every time ... which make me wonder why people voted for the exception option if there is nothing to answer. Sometimes discussions on administration rules are reduced to a number battle, except nobody seems to try to find meaning or justification to numbers, which make the discussion seem pointless. TomT0m ^(talk) 10:25, 22 September 2014 (UTC)