Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bureaucrat/분당선M

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Withdrawn by candidate. Legoktm (talk) 23:14, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

---

분당선M

Vote
RfP scheduled to end at 17 May 2013 15:46 (UTC)

• 분당선M (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)

Hey guys, I want to nominate bureaucratship. wikidata is growing fast and it means, we need more crats in my opinion. so I tried get cratship. I already have 7100+ edits and 3900+ admin actions in here. Honestly, I don't have any Bureaucrat flag in another wiki or any rights experience. Because I don't have any chance to doing them. but If I get flag, I promise doing my best. Best Regards.--DangSunM (talk) 15:46, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Votes

1.  Support Of course. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 15:50, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
2.  Support --StevenJ81 (talk) 18:50, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
3.  Support But in future give your account flags before locking your self out and need admins (me) to do it :) John F. Lewis (talk) 19:44, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
4.  Support --Rschen7754 20:47, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
5.  Support AutomaticStrikeout 01:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
6.  Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 06:17, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
7.  Support --LlamaAl (talk) 20:50, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
8.  Support --Iste (D) 14:18, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
9.  Support Sure. Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:19, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
10.  Support...Jakob ^{Megaphone, Telescope} 18:48, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
11.  Support We need more bureaucrats than just 4.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:14, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

    Do we? 89.182.53.108 21:48, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

12.  Support Has a lot of experience here on Wikidata. The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 20:57, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
13.  Support Sure. — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 21:36, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
14.  Support per above. --Ricordisamoa 03:02, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
15.  Support --Rzuwig^► 06:06, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
16.  Oppose NOTNOW case for me. 분당선M is surely an active admin, but I do not think he would be the best choice for bureaucratship, yet. A bureaucrat needs to be able to explain his decisions and preferably interact with the community. This community interaction lacks almost completely here[1]. Furthermore, I do not see the required accuracy in dealing with log summaries[2] and there was also no real participation in right discussions, yet. I hope this won't be taken personally, but I do not think this is the best area to work for him. If the things which I mentioned above change some day, I would happily support a new candidature. Regards, Vogone talk 20:49, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
17.  Oppose per Vogone, sorry--Steinsplitter (talk) 21:34, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments

• Withdrawn please close the request.--DangSunM (talk) 21:36, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

  Are you sure? My comment contains only my opinion and has not to be the opinion of the rest of the community. And please do not think I don't like you. I just do not think being a bureaucrat is the right role for you. :-) Regards, Vogone talk 21:54, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

  • NO, don't worry I don't think you don't like me. I'm happy to listen your advise and I tried to do my best. Please Withdrawn. Regards.--DangSunM (talk) 22:06, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.