Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Fomafix

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

✓ Done, clear consensus (11/1/1 | 91.666666666667%). Vogone talk 11:24, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fomafix[edit]

Vote
RfP scheduled to end after 14 December 2013 10:30 (UTC)

I would like to propose Fomafix for adminship, because I have seen many edit requests for gadgets by him/her. He/She is a long-time and technically competent user, and I think he/she would be an enrichment for our admin team. --Ricordisamoa 04:20, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: [1] Vogone talk 12:30, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Votes[edit]

  1. I am inclined to support the candidate, but I would caution the candidate to test things a touch more thoroughly. One or two parts of the changes suggested broke the gadgets in question. --Izno (talk) 13:45, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support --ValterVB (talk) 17:39, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Interesting that you think your signature is a valid argument either for or against the candidate but it might be nice if you could clarify whether you are for or against promoting Fomafix to those who don't understand the meaning of your signature. Vogone talk 19:04, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    I think Vogone could use a trout for that. Your comment does not come across as good faith. --Izno (talk) 19:47, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    I was assuming that ValterVB understands the irony here. Thanks for your suggestion, anyway. Vogone talk 20:39, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Vogone, what you say is not in good taste. The average vote on any of these discussions has no comment with it. I think that his support of the candidate is obvious. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:13, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    I am not sure what is so bad about asking a user to clarify his opinion here, especially since bureaucrats have to count the number of supports at the end (8 are required as you probably know) and it would be really sad if this vote wouldn't be counted just because the signing user forgot a word/comment. Vogone talk 18:19, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    So @ValterVB: would you please clarify your vote? Thanks, --Ricordisamoa 19:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, if I haven't commented my vote. My support is because we need also admin that are skilled to work on gadget, Also I haven't seen nothing to wrong in discussion page. So I think that he can be a useful administrator. --ValterVB (talk) 20:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    That you haven't commented wasn't the point here but thank you anyway. I think you just forgot something like a  Support template before your signature or something similar (it wasn't clear that you support at all). Though, I have no idea how this ended in such a wall of text and sorry for all the confusion. Vogone talk 20:18, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Weak oppose I'm a bit more concerned about gadget breakage, per Izno.--Jasper Deng (talk) 03:51, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Neutral If he can use 3rd, 4th... languages, I'll change. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Are you opposing the candidate because s/he is not trilingual? Legoktm (talk) 03:25, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    You probably mean "not supporting". ;) Vogone talk 17:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support -- Over 8,000 edits here and over 47,000 edits at all is enough for admin candidate in my mind. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:23, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support Positive interactions, including on de-WP. --Leyo 15:14, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support--DangSunM (talk) 23:10, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support I think they can be trusted with the bit. From what it sounds like, their suggested changes are being implemented anyway, so no change in mistakes right :)? Ajraddatz (Talk) 05:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support--GZWDer (talk) 14:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support Rzuwig► 16:25, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support — ΛΧΣ21 16:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support --by Revi레비 at 13:16, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:32, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Administrator/Fomafix&oldid=96289207"