Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 2
From Wikidata
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Not done, no consensus (1/5/0 | 16.666666666667%). --Vogone (talk) 09:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
RfP scheduled to end after 31 January 2017 08:22 (UTC)
- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Hello.I see that I can serve Wikidata using this permission because I am:
I contribute here and here I am an Arab.and I'll be the only Arab Administrator here and This is useful in anything related to Arabic I think I proved I could prove my experience.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Votes
[edit]- Oppose. My experience with this user in Commons there is a doubt about his common sense. I have no doubt that his motivation is to help but... Geagea (talk) 08:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Based on the interactions on the Project Chat, especially around subjects like banning offensive material I think the user doesn't understand our policies and there reasoning well enough to be an admin. ChristianKl (talk) 09:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Moral Support, kindly we still lack sysops from Arab world (Q143487). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per the last one. --Rschen7754 15:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per the last RfA. Notwithstanding that the need for an administrator with a certain linguistic background is already suspect, there are other users that fit the rationale you gave and in my view have much more healthy relationships with the Wikidata community. Mahir256 (talk) 16:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. --Rzuwig► 21:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]- See Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Geagea Your experience with me in Commons associated with using Google Images --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- No, it was started with tilting images with a lot of exlantion in COM:AN. And with other issues.Geagea (talk) 09:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you cite any specific instances where there was an issue because none of the existing admins speaks arabic?ChristianKl (talk) 11:44, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- ChristianKl It is useful to have administrators know the language and the contributors in Wikipedia in this language.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:02, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you saying that you know of no case where not knowing arabic was an issue? ChristianKl (talk) 12:07, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- ChristianKl Sometimes I find proposal merges (example), and Google Translate does not help so these cases need to expert user in that language and in Wikidata.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think you need admin rights for merging and unmerging. ChristianKl (talk) 12:28, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- ChristianKl I need admin rights for deleting --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:34, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think you need admin rights for merging and unmerging. ChristianKl (talk) 12:28, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- ChristianKl Sometimes I find proposal merges (example), and Google Translate does not help so these cases need to expert user in that language and in Wikidata.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you saying that you know of no case where not knowing arabic was an issue? ChristianKl (talk) 12:07, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- ChristianKl It is useful to have administrators know the language and the contributors in Wikipedia in this language.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:02, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- It seems somewhat obvious that we don't have sufficient contributors with this language (rtl languages seem to confuse most of us, or at least me) and we can always use more administrators active on Requests for deletions. "2" (sorry for the shorthand) nominated quite a few pages there, so it would be interesting to hear from administrators who handled these requests. It's my understanding that none of the administrators who opposed above are currently active there (or have been recently).
--- Jura 08:33, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]