User talk:Geagea

• ויקינתונים:מונחון
• Wikidata:Property proposal

---

Geagea's Archives
Archive 1

Import of J9U IDs - solving problems

English: Hi! Thanks again for your import of National Library of Israel J9U ID (P8189) IDs to Wikidata! However, I have just noticed that there are 175 cases in which two items, one (or both) being a human, share the same ID; these errors seem, in nearly all cases, due to the import. There are different types of cases, here some (please check 0247 tag in J9U):

• wrong ID due to strange error in J9U (contains both the correct one and this)
• wrong ID due to banal error in J9U (contains both the correct one and this, which misses the last digit)
• wrong ID due to disambiguation error in J9U (contains both the correct one and this disambiguation page!)
• wrong ID due to author-work error in J9U (contains both the correct one and this work item)

I am removing J9U IDs from not-pertinent items, but I need that wrong links from J9U to Wikidata are removed too; otherwise, future imports from J9U to Wikidata will make my work useless; so, I would ask you, when I have completely emptied the page, to check all the 175 J9U IDs one by one, in order to align them to Wikidata. I will inform you when I have finished the check. Thanks in advance! --Epìdosis 13:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

@Epìdosis, thank you very much for this comment. How I can have the full list of all the duplicate to work on them manually? if i understand correctly, all of them should be fixed also in the NLI database. Geagea (talk) 13:20, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Probably most of them need an adjustment in J9U, I'm not sure all of them; you can copy them from the two tables here. I suggest you to intervene in J9U after I have cleaned everything in Wikidata, so that you can rely on my edits instead of doing the same work that I'm doing, losing more time ;-) --Epìdosis 13:25, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

OK, this Sunday has been interesting :) I have finished all the cases, you can start the check in J9U. Thanks and good night! --Epìdosis 21:30, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

@Epìdosis, thanks. Can you look again about this Cebes (Q61474568) - Cebes (Q965144) - 987007259420605171. Geagea (talk) 11:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Also Cay Diedrich Lienau (Q1051931) - Cay Lienau (Q28869510) - 987007264674205171. look at the date of birth and death. Geagea (talk) 12:13, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Cebes moved, Cay Lienau seems OK on Wikidata. --Epìdosis 13:00, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

But her field 046: 1867-08-26 g 1953-04-14 2 edtf. It's fits to Q1051931. Geagea (talk) 13:06, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Also Tomasz Arciszewski (Q56344585) born in 1948 - Tomasz Arciszewski (Q888350) (1877–1955) 987007272548205171. Geagea (talk) 14:06, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Also Jakob Segal (Q91052) (1911-1995) - Jakub Segał (Q42393002) (1880-1943) - 987007274061905171. Geagea (talk) 14:14, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Cay Lienau: OK, moved, but "LCN note: b. 1937" should probably be removed. Moved the next two cases, of course. Thanks! --Epìdosis 23:28, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

@Epìdosis, thank you very much for your remarkable corrections and your efforts. Geagea (talk) 18:21, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

J9U persons on Mix'n'match

English: The catalog (https://mix-n-match.toolforge.org/?#/catalog/5446) has finally been created, thanks to the data you provided me and @Bargioni: a few months ago. The number of J9U IDs on Wikidata has increased of more than 50k. Good night, --Epìdosis 23:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Incorrectly associating family names with an individual family

I was reviewing your recent edits and you've added J9U identifiers to instances of family name (Q101352). That is nearly always incorrect. In the example of Westfeldt (Q63441575), a family name/last name, you have associated it with the J9U for "Westfeldt family". Please review your updates to items of type family name (Q101352). I think you will find that most need to be undone. --William Graham (talk) 18:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

I have further reviewed your edits. I recommend you roll back that entire batch. --William Graham (talk) 18:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, you are probably correct. I should mach them to family (Q8436). I will revert myself. Geagea (talk) 19:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

William Graham, you are correct. that's pity but... reverts are in process. Thank you. Geagea (talk) 19:35, 24 January 2023 (UTC)