Wikidata:Property proposal/type of age limit
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
type of age limit[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
| Description | qualifier on minimum age (P2899) to describe the type of age limit |
|---|---|
| Data type | Item |
| Allowed values | TBC: prohibited / not recommended / accompanying adult required / accompanying adult recommended / parental guidence suggested |
| Example 1 | ⟨ no minors under twelve (Q23817740)   ⟩ minimum age (P2899) ⟨ 12 year (Q577) ⟩type of age limit (P8241) ⟨ prohibited ⟩ |
| Example 2 | ⟨ 12A certificate (Q23301855) ⟩ minimum age (P2899) ⟨ 12 year (Q577) ⟩type of age limit (P8241) ⟨ accompanying adult required ⟩ |
| Example 3 | ⟨ Category II (Q23830577) ⟩ minimum age (P2899) ⟨ 12 year (Q577) ⟩type of age limit (P8241) ⟨ accompanying adult recommended ⟩ |
| Example 4 | ⟨ Category III (Q21571488) ⟩ minimum age (P2899) ⟨ 12 year (Q577) ⟩type of age limit (P8241) ⟨ not recommended ⟩ |
Motivation[edit]
Currently we are missing a big part of the information when reporting minimum age, especially in case of media content ratings. This qualifier is aimed at filling that gap. – Máté (talk) 09:08, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
@Trade: Might be of interest to you. – Máté (talk) 21:39, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment According to Wikipedia the PEGI ratings are legally enforceable in the region of Vienna but no in the rest of Austria. How should we indicate this? --Trade (talk) 22:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Trade: With multiple minimum age (P2899) statements with the same value but different applies to jurisdiction (P1001) and type of age limit. – Máté (talk) 22:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Support Great idea --Trade (talk) 22:33, 14 December 2019 (UTC)- It's not clear to me why this is a qualifier. In all the example it could also be a normal property. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 12:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl:: I gave examples relating to content ratings as those are what I usually work with, but P2899 is used on other kinds of items as well. Also, take 7-9 PG (Q42012493). Here both limits (7 and 9 years) could be added with the proper qualifiers if this were to be created as a qualifier. Currently only 7 years is added to avoid confusion. – Máté (talk) 07:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- Okay, I think it makes sense for dealing with such items. Support ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 08:04, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- How about "object has role"? --- Jura 16:23, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- It might be a consequence of our respective native languages but I would not identify this reletionship as "role". Also, a specific property would make for easier constraints and queries. – Máté (talk) 17:02, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Máté, Trade, ChristianKl: type of age limit (P8241) has been created. Pamputt (talk) 22:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC)