Wikidata:Property proposal/type of age limit

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

type of age limit[edit]

Return to Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

   Ready Create
Descriptionqualifier on minimum age (P2899) to describe the type of age limit
Data typeItem
Allowed valuesTBC: prohibited / not recommended / accompanying adult required / accompanying adult recommended / parental guidence suggested
Example 1
< no minors under twelve (12) (Q23817740) View with Reasonator View with SQID > minimum age (P2899) View with SQID < 12 year (Q577) >
type of age limit search < prohibited >
Example 2
< 12A certificate (Q23301855) View with Reasonator View with SQID > minimum age (P2899) View with SQID < 12 year (Q577) >
type of age limit search < accompanying adult required >
Example 3
< Category II (Q23830577) View with Reasonator View with SQID > minimum age (P2899) View with SQID < 12 year (Q577) >
type of age limit search < accompanying adult recommended >
Example 4
< Category III (Q21571488) View with Reasonator View with SQID > minimum age (P2899) View with SQID < 12 year (Q577) >
type of age limit search < not recommended >

Motivation[edit]

Currently we are missing a big part of the information when reporting minimum age, especially in case of media content ratings. This qualifier is aimed at filling that gap. – Máté (talk) 09:08, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

@Trade: Might be of interest to you. – Máté (talk) 21:39, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment According to Wikipedia the PEGI ratings are legally enforceable in the region of Vienna but no in the rest of Austria. How should we indicate this? --Trade (talk) 22:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great idea --Trade (talk) 22:33, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
  • It's not clear to me why this is a qualifier. In all the example it could also be a normal property. ChristianKl❫ 12:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
    • @ChristianKl:: I gave examples relating to content ratings as those are what I usually work with, but P2899 is used on other kinds of items as well. Also, take 7-9 PG (Q42012493). Here both limits (7 and 9 years) could be added with the proper qualifiers if this were to be created as a qualifier. Currently only 7 years is added to avoid confusion. – Máté (talk) 07:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
    • Okay, I think it makes sense for dealing with such items. Symbol support vote.svg Support ChristianKl❫ 08:04, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
  • How about "object has role"? --- Jura 16:23, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
    • It might be a consequence of our respective native languages but I would not identify this reletionship as "role". Also, a specific property would make for easier constraints and queries. – Máté (talk) 17:02, 20 January 2020 (UTC)