Wikidata:Property proposal/reviewed by

reviewed by

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work

   Done: reviewed by (P4032) (Talk and documentation)

Description	person who have reviewed/refereed the work
Data type	Item
Domain	scholarly article (Q13442814) and similar
Example	Visualizing data mining results with the Brede tools (Q26820755) → John Darrell Van Horn (Q30085386) and Kate Fissell (Q30086181) [1]

Motivation

In academic publishing articles are often peer-reviewed. Often this process happens in a blinded fashion with anonymous reviewers. In some cases the reviewers are known and can be recorded. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 12:13, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Discussion

•  Support Yes I see how this makes sense. --Andrawaag (talk) 19:34, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
• @Fnielsen: This item needs an English description. Domain is likely not human (Q5) but work (Q386724) or something similar. human (Q5) might by reasonable for allowed values but person (Q215627) might be more fitting. ChristianKl (talk) 10:31, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks for catching the wrong domain and the missing english description. I have changed the domain and added an English description. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 12:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support ChristianKl (talk) 22:42, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support. This is useful information to record when available. YULdigitalpreservation (talk) 17:23, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

• @Fnielsen, Andrawaag, ChristianKl, YULdigitalpreservation:  Done ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)