Wikidata:Property proposal/Rijksmonument complex ID
Rijksmonument complex ID[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
| Description | identifier for a monument complex assigned by the Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed |
|---|---|
| Represents | Rijksmonument complex (Q13423591) |
| Data type | External identifier |
| Allowed values | \d{1,6} (numerical string, between 1 and 600000) |
| Example 1 | Elswout (Q2278595) → 339207 |
| Example 2 | Keukenhof (Q18769666) → 511407 |
| Example 3 | Duin en Kruidberg, Santpoort (Q2625400) → 520692 |
| Planned use | Move current usage from Rijksmonument ID (P359) |
| Number of IDs in source | 2500+ |
| Expected completeness | eventually complete (Q21873974) |
| Formatter URL | https://monumentenregister.cultureelerfgoed.nl/monumenten/$1 |
| Robot and gadget jobs | Move from Rijksmonument ID (P359) |
| See also | Rijksmonument ID (P359) |
Motivation[edit]
For Rijksmonumenten we have the property Rijksmonument ID (P359). We currently use this property for both Rijksmonument (Q916333) (including pre-protected Rijksmonument (Q17698911)) and Rijksmonument complex (Q13423591). This already gave some problems in the past with linking (see property talk page). The RCE published all their data about Rijksmonumenten as linked data at https://linkeddata.cultureelerfgoed.nl/ and this includes their datamodel. In this model they make a distinction between rijksmonumentnummer and complexnummer. I want to split of the monument complexes from Rijksmonument ID (P359) to this new property to bring our data model in line with the one from the RCE. Current usage is 2688 items based on this query. Multichill (talk) 16:13, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Support David (talk) 05:20, 27 July 2019 (UTC)- Support. YULdigitalpreservation (talk) 18:26, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, YULdigitalpreservation, Multichill: 
Done: Rijksmonument complex ID (P7135). − Pintoch (talk) 07:48, 3 August 2019 (UTC)