Wikidata:Property proposal/NASA active astronaut ID

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

NASA active astronaut ID[edit]

Return to Wikidata:Property proposal/Person

   Ready Create
Descriptionidentifier used by NASA for an active astronaut
Data typeExternal identifier
Allowed values[a-z]+
Example 1Joseph M. Acaba (Q318934)joseph-m-acaba
Example 2Christina Koch (Q13500192)christina-h-koch
Example 3Kjell N. Lindgren (Q3197699)kjell-n-lindgren
Example 4Gregory Reid Wiseman (Q3116390)reid-g-wiseman
External linksUse in sister projects: [ar][de][en][es][fr][he][it][ja][ko][nl][pl][pt][ru][sv][vi][zh][commons][species][wd].
Planned usemanual insertion
Number of IDs in source48 (from source)
Expected completenessalways incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URL$1
See alsoNASA biographical ID (P2030)


Necessary as NASA biographical ID (P2030) works no more: please see Property_talk:P2030#Problem in the url. Epìdosis 12:37, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. 4 years after the web change all the URL, it time to create new property. - yona b (talk) 18:38, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment 48 is a very small number for a property like this, have you considered alternative solutions? On the other hand maybe NASA's planning on a lot more active astronauts soon? ArthurPSmith (talk) 23:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
    @ArthurPSmith: I don't know about NASA programming a lot more active astronauts soon, it may or it may not, and I agree about 48 not beeing a huge number. The main reason for the proposal is that these astrounats used to have a valid value of NASA biographical ID (P2030) for their biographies, until NASA reformed the website and made the formatter URLs for active and former astronauts different; so creating this property has the objective of restoring some IDs which existed before a change in NASA website - I hope it is a sufficient motivation. --Epìdosis 23:46, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @ArthurPSmith, Epìdosis: Perhaps we can put this proposal with the status = on hold. When there is enough input, the proposal will be reconsidered. —Eihel (talk) 23:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)