Wikidata:Property proposal/Latvian Protected Nature Territory URL
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Latvian Protected Nature Territory URL
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
- Motivation
It is official information pages about Latvian Protected Nature Territories from Nature Conservation Agency (governmental agency). Currently there are more than 800 Specially Protected Nature Territories in Latvia. --Voll (talk) 09:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support --GreenZeb (talk) 10:20, 15 April 2017 (UTC)- Support, needed for our project with protected nature territories. --Papuass (talk) 11:30, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- Question: Could this not use the exeternal ID datatype, with a value, for the example, of daugava_pie_kaibalas? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:30, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- Unfortunately agency doesn't use flat URLs. They have for example:
- IMHO URL type will be better. --Voll (talk) 19:45, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support, per Papuass. --Edgars2007 (talk) 12:48, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Done @Voll, GreenZeb, Papuass, Edgars2007: Now Latvian Protected Nature Territory URL (P4001) -- Lymantria (talk) 07:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Comment @Voll, GreenZeb, Papuass, Edgars2007, Lymantria: This should have been an external identifier honestly. I mean, all the URLs start with a pretty long unchanging string, which is https://daba.gov.lv/public/lat/iadt/. Can we still change this? Thierry Caro (talk) 11:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)- @Thierry Caro: I do not agree, as some of the examples Voll gave above are pages, some subpages. I don't think that qualifies for being a ixternal-id. Lymantria (talk) 11:27, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- I would still have gone for the identifier datatype. But if everyone else is fine with the current solution… Thierry Caro (talk) 13:03, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- Everyone else isn't, as I thought I made clear above. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:57, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- I would still have gone for the identifier datatype. But if everyone else is fine with the current solution… Thierry Caro (talk) 13:03, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Thierry Caro: I do not agree, as some of the examples Voll gave above are pages, some subpages. I don't think that qualifies for being a ixternal-id. Lymantria (talk) 11:27, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
