Wikidata:Property proposal/Anti-Cheat software used
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Anti-Cheat software[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
Not done
| Description | anti-cheat solution used by this multiplayer video game |
|---|---|
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | multiplayer video game (Q6895044) |
| Allowed values | Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (Q842146), Easy Anti-Cheat (Q65230951), BattlEye (Q109362619), Battlefield 4 (Q2618557), nProtect GameGuard (Q285926) |
| Example 1 | Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (Q842146) > Valve Anti-Cheat (Q746431) |
| Example 2 | Tom Clancy's The Division 2 (Q50376754) > Easy Anti-Cheat (Q65230951) |
| Example 3 | PUBG: Battlegrounds (Q28937399) > BattlEye (Q109362619) |
| Example 4 | Battlefield 4 (Q2618557) > PunkBuster (Q849927) |
| Example 5 | Atlantica Online (Q736801) > nProtect GameGuard (Q285926) |
| Source | Valve Anti-Cheat #1, Valve Anti-Cheat #2, Easy Anti-Cheat #1, Easy Anti-Cheat #2 , Easy Anti-Cheat #3, BattlEye, PunkBuster |
| Number of IDs in source | Hundreds |
| Distinct-values constraint | no |
| Wikidata project | WikiProject Video games (Q8485882) |
--Trade (talk) 01:49, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Notified participants of WikiProject Video games--Trade (talk) 03:17, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Question How is this better than "uses" statements combined with "has use"? —Tomodachi94 (talk) 04:17, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds like a mess. You could easily add a dozen of wildly different statements that way--Trade (talk) 15:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Use uses (P2283). You don't even need has use (P366); that should be apparent from a P31 on the object item. This is pointless property balkanization. Swpb (talk) 17:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Not done per lack of support. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 04:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
