Wikidata:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/Archive/2021

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Edoderoobot

@Edoderoo:'s @Edoderoobot: seems to malfunction, see User talk:Edoderoobot. / Please note Topic:W57q8jx1iydgsvri. --- Jura 10:57, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

There doesn't seem to be a bot request for this nor has the bot a user page indicating its operator. --- Jura 13:17, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

This one has been blocked, just to note that not all bots have to be aproved. For example, we have bots operating in the projects, and the edits in the projects result in edits on Wikidata.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:09, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
I didn't notice any of that for the above bot. Is it relevant? If it just runs in user namespace, I probably wouldn't even notice ;) --- Jura 19:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Request for flood flag for alt account

I am using quickstatements for some time now. I have now recently become a global rollbacker. Global rollbacker contains the 'noratelimit' permission, which makes quickstatements run at ridiculous edit rates and I do not want to kick the API that much. I have now decided to use an altaccount for quickstatements in the future (User:Zabe (flood)). Since I will only be using that account for the usage of quickstatements, I would like to request the flood flag for it so that in the future I don't flood the recent changes so much. Also, it would be helpful to get the account added to the 'confirmed user' user group so I can actually use quickstatements with it. Regards --Zabe (talk) 10:01, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

confirming this request with this account --Zabe (flood) (talk) 10:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done--Ymblanter (talk) 18:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
@Ymblanter: thanks, but could you add the account to the 'confirmed user' user group aswell? --Zabe (talk) 19:30, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Yes, sure--Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
thanks --Zabe (talk) 19:34, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Request flood/pseudobot flag for Amitie 10g

Hi, I'm merging duplicated items created by TOP500 importer using the Merge tool, but I don't want to use my bot account to make manual editions (as those are tag as a bot), so, I want to do the task using my main account, without the edition limits. Thanks. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:58, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done, please do not forget to remove the flag when you are done.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:24, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
@Ymblanter: It has been 2 months, should the flood flag be removed? --Minorax (talk) 05:20, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
It looks indeed they are not doing this task anymore, I removed the flag.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:09, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. DannyS712 (talk) 08:47, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Request resolved but still awaiting for approval

Hello, the bot request for the ComplexPortalBot has been resolved (the strong oppose has been addressed and the final comment says that questions "were addressed and so it could move ahead." I think I need a bureaucrat to help move it forward, right? If it there is anything I am missing, please let me know. Thanks! TiagoLubiana (talk) 00:45, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done --Lymantria (talk) 20:27, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. DannyS712 (talk) 12:25, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Status on property proposal Taxonomic Treatment

I am reaching out here with respect to a property proposal for taxonomic treatment. The discussion seems to have settled, but it remains to be flagged as under discussion. Could anyone chack if this is property is ready to be implemented? --Andrawaag (talk) 16:24, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Request for flood flag for alt account (User:Yahya (flood))

I am using quickstatements for some time now. But I no longer want to make these edits from the original account. I basically add Bangla labels and descriptions with QS tool. This permission will allow bulk actions to stay out of recent changes while my regular account that I use for day-to-day edits can remain unflagged and visible in recent changes. Also, it would be helpful to get the account added to the 'confirmed user' user group so I can actually use quickstatements with it. Regards, Yahya (talk) 18:50, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Confirming this request with this account. Yahya (flood) (talk) 18:54, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done, if you expect inactivity periods please remove the flag and re-request it when needed.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:28, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. @Ymblanter: Can you please assign 'confirmed user' user group? Yahya (talk) 20:42, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done--Ymblanter (talk) 20:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Request for flood flag for User:Saarik

Dear bureaucrats, In the following 6 to 12 months I will be mapping and adding YSO ID (P2347) values for several thousands of items. The aim is to map most of the 33.000 YSO concepts to Wikidata and we are now half way there at around 16.000. I would use several tools, but first I would work with Openrefine 3.3. However, my legitimates uploads are now triggering abuse filters, e.g. 121. What to do? Would I need to have a "flood tag" set for my account or should I create a separate account for these bulk uploads? Saarik (talk) 17:06, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

I do not know, I hope somebody familiar with the technical side would comment. Normally, 15K edits in half a year is nothing. Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
I don't think that hitting abusefilter 121 is something you should worry about. It is a "tag only" filter. Lymantria (talk) 06:22, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Translation administrator

Can a 'crat remove TA from User:SandraF (WMF). Thanks. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done--Ymblanter (talk) 14:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)